RT in the United States is listed as "foreign agents"

57
The US Department of Justice has listed Russia Today TV channel and Sputnik news agency on the list of “foreign agents” media. Thus, the pressure on the Russian media led to their registration in the United States precisely as “foreign agents”, with the need not only financially but also in other formats to report on work to the US supervisory agencies.

Now RT representatives will have to post on the screen information that the viewer in the USA is watching the programs of the “foreign agent”. In addition, the leadership of the TV channel will have to send reporting documents about the personal data of journalists and interviewed figures to the supervisory authority of the United States. Before interviewing a US citizen, the management of the TV channel is obliged to notify him that he is dealing with a "foreign agent."



The official website of the US Department of Justice announces that such actions against RT and Sputnik do not violate freedom of speech.

RT in the United States is listed as "foreign agents"


From the statement of the representative of the US Department of Justice:
The law does not limit the freedom of speech and the content of the information disseminated. It is impartially implemented in relation to (media) of all foreign countries.


The fact that the law is being implemented in relation to the media of “all foreign states”, and even “impartially” is another lie of the representatives of the American authorities.

Now in Russia they are going to implement mirror measures in relation to all the American media, as well as other media with a US share capital.
  • http://www.globallookpress.com
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

57 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +3
    14 November 2017 05: 50
    Finally. And let them still show, “Whatever bad happens, the cat is dead, the neighbor is violent ... Remember, WE are to blame for everything!”
    1. +14
      14 November 2017 08: 09
      Now in Russia they are going to implement mirror measures in relation to all American media, as well as other media with American registered capital

      Well, let’s look at the mirror answer or on duty concern.
      1. +2
        14 November 2017 09: 17
        RT in the United States is listed as a “foreign agent”. What response will Russia take to the American media?
        we express our concern and in a year and a half will include CNN and Radio Liberty agents
      2. +2
        14 November 2017 10: 29
        Quote: 79807420129
        Well, let’s look at the mirror answer or on duty concern.

        Quote: dik-nsk
        we express our concern and in a year and a half will include CNN and Radio Liberty agents

        There will be no one and a half years. According to Magnitsky’s law, ours reacted quite quickly, banning the adoption of Russian children and obliging numerous NGOs to register as foreign agents, which caused a howl in all corners and back streets of the world “democracy”.
    2. +5
      14 November 2017 08: 18
      Now in Russia going to implement mirror measures in relation to all American media, as well as other media with American registered capital.

      As the saying goes: until the sun rises, the dew eyes eat up - this is to the fact that they have been going for a very long time. How else is it necessary to humiliate our country so that those in power can wake up and begin to protect its interests?
      1. +3
        14 November 2017 08: 37
        That the answer was mirror it needs to be thought over. And then nothing can be done without a legal basis.
        1. +3
          14 November 2017 10: 42
          The wording: “A response to the actions of a hostile state that violates the principles of democracy and justice” is quite enough. In general, any foreign journalist should enter Russia on a Russian visa only through the Crimea.
        2. 0
          14 November 2017 12: 38
          That's right - you just have to think in advance - this topic has been discussed for a long time.
          1. +1
            15 November 2017 09: 35
            About 27 years ago, and maybe earlier it was necessary to think. And now for the situation. Direct conflict is disadvantageous for us. And let the US lose face further.
  2. +1
    14 November 2017 05: 52
    It is also necessary to press them as quickly as possible.
    1. +15
      14 November 2017 06: 28
      what angers the most is our pontorez, the mattresses immediately said just register as foreign agents, ours said that this would destroy the channel and that we won’t go to it and that we would respond in a mirror. Solovyov, who only did not scream about this.
      and what is the result? wiped off again and did everything they said mattresses to do? Why are you puffed up? What threatened with an answer (western channels and sharagi emnip and so foreign agents)?
      it’s like with the S-400 in Syria, when all sorts of Klintsevichs were put on duty on all channels of the trindel that the sky of Syria was closed, pictures were posted on all sites with the radius of the S-400 on the map of Syria. they say they closed everything, and then the tomahawks flew around the airfield and that's all. no one draws circles and achs that the S-400 is not working properly because of the curvature of the planet Earth, but what, before, the Klintsevichs and others did not know that the Earth was round?
      I understand that the states need a cut-off for war (public debt will be written off), that they get Russia, slander it, provoke, not only me, we all understand, but damn, what the hell are all sorts of faces from the screen bleating like we uhhhh, yes how we ohhhhh, and then we wow them.
      and how the mattresses will give the sub-tributary, there is neither uhhhh, nor oohhhh, nor wow, but some moans, and a sensation of spitting on the face, because we believed the faces from the screen that we can both uhhh and ohhhhh, and wow.
      but in fact ......
      1. +2
        14 November 2017 06: 33
        why the hell are all sorts of faces from the screen bleating like we give them uhhhh, but how do we ohhhhhh, and then we wow them.


        Abruptly smile good
      2. SOF
        +8
        14 November 2017 06: 47
        ... how do we give them uhhhh, but how do we give them oohhhh ...

        ... ek you erupted ... Someone you now remind ........... Oh yes ...
        ... all sorts of faces on the screen ...

        Everyone imagines himself a strategist, seeing the battle from the side ...
        1. PN
          +2
          14 November 2017 07: 00
          Man painted everything correctly. It is better to be silent and to do than to say no.
          1. +6
            14 November 2017 07: 08
            as I recall, there was only one really worthy answer to Western tricks: food and other counter-sanctions, when they banned the import of any hawk from the EU and it really hit the EU, they lost a large market, and this led to losses in lard bucks.
            as I remember, it’s because we don’t have tryndels from the screen that our people will impose sanctions if the West does something there. ours simply entered counter-sanctions in silence, without show off from the screen, at first they did, and only then they announced what they had done. that is, confronted with a fact.
            and now .... I see that our screens are threatening that they will do something in response, I understand that they are lying, because they will not do anything.
            and unfortunately I have been convinced over the past few years that I am right ((((
            and by the way, our troops entered Syria without show off from the screen that they say we will introduce. Ours first built the infrastructure, then introduced equipment and personnel (they were there at least a month before the official launch, even there were articles about this).
            and only then again without pathos, they simply confronted the fact.
            1. 0
              14 November 2017 07: 32
              Quote: just explo
              as I remember, this is because we don’t have tryndels from the screen saying that

              These were ours
              Quote: just explo
              I see that our screens are threatening that they will do something in response,

              and this, apparently, is yours ...
              So yes, "With whom are you, masters of culture?" ...
          2. SOF
            +4
            14 November 2017 07: 25
            Better to be silent and do than to say no

            ... yes, yes ... and I think so. Better to be silent. Therefore, in addition to the top saying, I will add:
            "* -Not toss the bags."
            And “HORIZONS” from the screen - they have such a job when someone is silent and does, someone has to say something, otherwise the rhetoric of the ever-dissatisfied will look differently: “Why are we SILENT? Why languages ​​..... stuck . "
            And do not convince me otherwise - these are the laws of the universe.
            1. 0
              14 November 2017 09: 51
              You don’t need to be silent, you just need to voice real things, and not just then turn against you.
              and as we squeal from our screens, it’s better to be silent than to bring such nonsense.
              because silence is discontent and suspense, and when you are given the confidence that you will act, and only the counters give you and you are silent, it generally causes a lousy feeling, the unknown is better, there is hope, and not knowing that you will continue to you will flow around. \
              in fact, it was necessary to correctly prioritize our boundaries of action, so that there would not be unnecessary expectations, and act in response, but report from AFTER. then even if we don’t do anything, the feeling remains that something is already being done.
              1. SOF
                +3
                14 November 2017 10: 18
                Quote: just explo
                in fact, it was necessary to correctly prioritize our boundaries of action

                ...what are you carrying?
                What did you want to hear / not disclose? About the following:
                1. a) the Turks will shoot quietly;
                b) the Turks will shoot open;
                c) we will shoot down Turkish planes on the sly;
                d) we will shoot down Turkish planes in the open.
                2. a) Jews will be shot only in secret;
                b) Israeli planes will only be shot down on the sly.
                3. a) Americans will shoot ............ ect. ?????
                Klintsevich and other "FOORWEARS" (keeping your vocabulary), who do you think? The executive branch, in the hands of which is the entire foreign policy of the state? ... what kind of reality do you live in?
                Tie up breed panic and strew populist slogans...
                1. 0
                  14 November 2017 10: 53
                  What does the Turks have to do with it? Have you read the article you are commenting on and comments on it? or are you lost in time and stayed in those times?
                  I’m talking about those characters who tryndy from the TV about the actions that they were not going to do. if you are not familiar with the term consonant with the word starball, then take an interest in its meaning on the street, they will explain to you in more detail.
                  and do not confuse the sudden provocation, which is impossible to guess, with the one about which the provocateurs have warned for another couple of months.
                  Do you even reach the level of idiocy of some statements? for example, how our mattresses were taken away in San Francisco, the consulate, and there they had to do the type of mattress, the mattresses were not warned about these inspections in one week, and then it’s necessary, they show the type of mattress tyranny in the box, they say and read secret SECRET archives.
                  I’m going to scrub my mother, I understand that the mattresses lost their scent, but ours didn’t think when they could take out / destroy secret documents in 2 weeks? or there weren’t these documents, then what is the drawer about?
                  who is the star?
                  Will you say that this is normal? Do you like it when they hold you for a sucker and don’t even want to get ready to wave away from you. gave for excuses version for idiots, and type is enough. Do you like this attitude?
                  and I understand when busy people behave this way, who are all at work and they don’t have time to devise legends, but when it is carried by those who are responsible for publicizing positions, it’s {censored}.
                  let’s let our engineers work the same way, and then we will have PAK FA of those. 1915 bookcase level. why, the guys don’t think it necessary to strain, they gave it away, so eat what they have done and don’t dare say something against it if you (not personally, this is a formal appeal to the crowd) do not like something.
                  and these are not populist slogans, I do not criticize engineers and their products, although I do not quite agree what they did, I do not criticize the general staff and other structures.
                  I criticize the bureaucrats who do not monitor their language. only them. because I already really start to bomb when I read what they carry.
                  1. SOF
                    +1
                    14 November 2017 12: 02
                    Quote: just explo
                    when I read what they carry

                    ... and who argues with this? But you can, after all, filter who said what said and under what circumstances. Well, at least not to spoil the nerves of yourself and others. Believe me when on certain level will be stated declaration of war и the beginning of general mobilization you will have no opportunity to be deceived in the correct interpretation of what has been said.
                    And in general, in vain do you think that I have a desire to dive with you for the right to leave the last word for myself. Not at all. I expressed my opinion. Yours will remain yours.
                    hi
      3. 0
        14 November 2017 07: 35
        Quote: just explo
        I understand that the states need a war to kill (the public debt will be written off)

        If the war with Russia, then the public debt will be written off together with the USA, but they don’t need it, so they are rushing around, they are looking for other ways.
        1. 0
          14 November 2017 09: 45
          they need a good war, but not directly between the USA and the Russian Federation, they simply organize wars of third countries, and the Russian Federation and the USA will participate there as a third party.
          as an example - Vietnam. Afghan.
          and if it’s better than in Africa, where there was no type of either our mattresses, but in reality there were both. but that the war would be big, that the sides of technology would ruin a lot and the EU and other countries were forced to stock up on tens and better hundreds of lard weapons and ammunition (it seems like the Saudis have already spent more than 100 lard on Yemen, and if you drag the EU into such ? there the order will be with such a bunch of zeros).
      4. +1
        15 November 2017 15: 44
        N. Starikov very accurately described the situation!
        Link: https://nstarikov.ru/blog/86807 (video is not inserted)
        The situation with the Republic of Tatarstan once again confirms that our government is a bedding bedding 100500 times.
  3. +2
    14 November 2017 05: 53
    Now in Russia they are going to implement mirror measures in relation to all the American media, as well as other media with a US share capital.

    Once upon a time! Nothing more to add ....
    1. +2
      14 November 2017 05: 56
      We’re waiting! Three years will not pass! Until now, mud has been poured with impunity.
      Quote: romandostalo
      Now in Russia they are going to implement mirror measures in relation to all the American media, as well as other media with a US share capital.

      Once upon a time! Nothing more to add ....
  4. +3
    14 November 2017 05: 53
    The Foreign Ministry will express concern, we are not so angry as the United States and we will succumb to provocations and we will not register American media as foreign agents
  5. +4
    14 November 2017 06: 05
    I am afraid in response from the Kremlin there will be only one big bunch for the actions of the Americans ...

    In modern language smile I am in great perplexity and concern.
    1. 0
      14 November 2017 06: 15
      Quote: The same Lech
      I am afraid in response from the Kremlin there will be only one big bunch for the actions of the Americans ...

      In response to what? To the fact that ANO "TV-News", unknown to anyone, was added to the list of foreign agents in its most elusive version?
      Look, for example, Deripaska from "VTB-groups" next to the list and do not resent. wink

      What is the conversation about at all, can anyone here clearly say?
      1. +3
        14 November 2017 06: 19
        What is the conversation about at all, can anyone here clearly say?


        smile I can smile...
        talking about the adequacy of the response to the pranks of the Americans ... to be concerned or to do as they are ... wifi.
        1. +2
          14 November 2017 06: 53
          Quote: The same Lech
          What is the conversation about at all, can anyone here clearly say?


          smile I can smile...
          talking about the adequacy of the response to the pranks of the Americans ... to be concerned or to do as they are ... wifi.

          What are the "pranks of Americans"? Do you have any idea what you are writing about, or is it not important for you, but just to write? As "foreign agents" in the states, a bunch of, for example, Chinese media are registered. At one time, TASS, RIA and the Pravda newspaper were registered in this way and they did not raise a howl. Now what is the problem, can you explain?
          PS: By the way, there isn’t and wasn’t any Rush People in America. There’s a VTB-group’s screen, but there aren’t any rash people. Can you imagine? wink
          1. +1
            14 November 2017 07: 19
            I explain the essence ... and the essence of the control over the media ...

            Foreign media may oblige the Ministry of Justice to submit a report on its activities once a quarter, as well as an annual audit report, as is now happening with NGOs. Indicate on their materials "foreign agent" also have to.


            it was done in the USA and now the same response is proposed in Russia ... what Why is it incomprehensible then.
            1. +2
              14 November 2017 07: 42
              Quote: The same Lech
              I explain the essence ... and the essence of the control over the media ...

              Foreign media may oblige the Ministry of Justice to submit a report on its activities once a quarter, as well as an annual audit report, as is now happening with NGOs. Indicate on their materials "foreign agent" also have to.


              it was done in the USA and now the same response is proposed in Russia ... what Why is it incomprehensible then.

              I’ll ask you again: Why did RIA, TASS, Pravda, VTB Group ... it didn’t and didn’t care, and Simonyan screeched like scalded?
              1. +1
                14 November 2017 07: 44
                RIA, TASS, Pravda, VTB Group ... didn’t and didn’t care, but Simonyan screeched like scalded?


                Do not know smile I won’t lie ... call yourself there and find out.
            2. +1
              14 November 2017 11: 35
              may oblige the Ministry of Justice to submit a report on its activities once a quarter, as well as an annual audit report


              - Well, just the end of the world, arrogance of the highest category. and as soon as you can endure it without hitting with all your might in return?

              RT - well, just like a girl from the Institute of Noble Maidens. I came to the ball, and there Lieutenant Rzhevsky.
              I’ll cry.
          2. +2
            14 November 2017 07: 45
            Quote: analgin
            PS: By the way, there isn’t and wasn’t any Rush People in America.

            RT America _initial_ American media. Without any foreign sponsors. This is sadness.
            And not for us, but for the USA.
            Therefore, such an advertisement of an ongoing event. They are cheap and effective - now in the USA and WP you can easily recognize lehkhko as an agent. The 53rd year of America is returning, McCarthyism.
            1. +1
              14 November 2017 08: 38
              Quote: sogdy

              RT America _initial_ American media. Without any foreign sponsors. This is sadness.

              Really? And what do they earn money for at least to pay for their chic office? Want to guess the answer? "I do not know". winked
              Quote: sogdy

              Therefore, such an advertisement of an ongoing event.

              Advertising exclusively from Simonyan. There’s nothing from VTB Group, Deripaska and even Lavrov (all of a sudden, huh?).
              1. +1
                14 November 2017 09: 52
                Quote: analgin
                Advertising exclusively from Simonyan. There’s nothing from VTB Group, Deripaska and even Lavrov (all of a sudden, huh?).

                I suppose you didn’t stop at the fungi. For the logical connection between the erupted words is obvious exclusively to you.
  6. +1
    14 November 2017 06: 09
    And we will "answer in the mirror" -year after 10, at best.
  7. +2
    14 November 2017 06: 22
    Information Security Posters https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/3805364.htm
    l
  8. +2
    14 November 2017 06: 35
    Well, "introduced" and then what? But is RT not a “foreign agent”? And indeed, this does not affect the notorious "freedom of speech." And, here in Russia, for a long time it has already been necessary to recognize all mass media as “foreign agents” including all TV channels as they all belong to non-Russian citizens.
    1. +2
      14 November 2017 06: 42
      laughing That's what I look at RT America all Russian-speaking with the passports of the Russian Federation and everyone has a portrait of Putin and Stalin in his office laughing
      1. +1
        14 November 2017 06: 56
        Quote: Alexander War
        laughing That's what I look at RT America all Russian-speaking with the passports of the Russian Federation and everyone has a portrait of Putin and Stalin in his office laughing

        Yeah, and the salary of $ 670000, i.e. 40 million rubles a year.
        1. 0
          14 November 2017 09: 57
          Analgin, you also have a loss of reality.
          Or poor language skills - or weed.
          When you have nothing to say - do not strain, otherwise your diarrhea will torture others.
  9. +1
    14 November 2017 06: 55
    [quote = just explo] what angers the most is our pontorez, mattresses immediately said just register as foreign agents, ...........
    It’s not necessary to naively believe “faces from the screen”, but it’s worthwhile to think through the response together - the method of “drunk Scythians” has not outlived itself.
  10. 0
    14 November 2017 06: 58
    Today I watched in the news an interview with P. Tolstoy: they there all talk about correctness and logic. most likely they will do it in one place again. something does not allow them to copy Amer’s law and spread rot for all who need it (again, like the Americans) ... lack of gray matter?
  11. +3
    14 November 2017 06: 58
    Russia is going to implement mirror measures in relation to all American media, as well as other media with American registered capital.

    Let's see how fast this happens. Everyone played with the West in democracy and freedom of speech. Played to the point that they began to wet us in all directions from the media to sports. Now continue to play these games with the Russian media, which are conducting anti-Russian propaganda to please the West.
    1. 0
      14 November 2017 08: 45
      Quote: rotmistr60
      Everyone played with the West in democracy and freedom of speech. Played to the point that they began to wet us in all directions from the media to sports. Now continue to play these games with the Russian media, which are conducting anti-Russian propaganda to please the West.

      What the hell are you "playing" again? How does introducing foreign agents violate democracy and freedom of speech?
      Well, is it possible in the States to work this way? This is some kind of Russia turns out!
  12. +2
    14 November 2017 07: 15
    Congressional council in 2017 requested $ 778 million to "provide information from an American point of view and explain US foreign policy, to defend American interests and priorities." - it is clear what kind of information this is. Start with TC Rain, and then for Echo of Moscow, Voice of America, and Radio Liberty - increase the pressure by several times.
  13. +3
    14 November 2017 08: 16
    if I don’t go into the smoking room at work, local RTs are watching. I grue so etogo propaganda. Well, yes they say, but interesting. )) such as an alternative to the forbidden fruit, as in the Soviet voice of America. by snn vss, we already know what they’ll say, and here it’s something new)) ..... well, the girls there are busty hosts are tastefully selected)) I look)
    1. +1
      14 November 2017 11: 02
      And where does it look “in the smoking room” in the USA? ”Nobody is watching it, they don’t even know about it, except that they heard something in NY and WOK. In addition, "values" are allowed to watch "on working" and "public" places only "proved channels" such as CNN, NBC, BBC News, etc.
  14. +1
    14 November 2017 08: 34
    Now in Russia they are going to implement mirror measures in relation to all the American media, as well as other media with a US share capital.

    Pay attention - they are only going! And why already not gathered? That which will be so is not a surprise to anyone in the world. But not for our so-called officials. I wonder how many more snot will chew before they answer?
  15. Say
    0
    14 November 2017 08: 38
    Six months later, someone will express concern.
    1. 0
      14 November 2017 14: 47
      For those who are in the tank.
      https://m.vedomosti.ru/politics/articles/2017/11/
      13/741374-answer-na-rt
      The question is in days. And faster is simply impossible. And the document was prepared long.
  16. 0
    14 November 2017 13: 40
    We are late, gentlemen, officials! All measures must be taken one minute or during the adoption of the Russophobic law, regulation, etc.
    1. 0
      14 November 2017 14: 48
      How amateurs and ignoramuses work. Impossible to do everything in a minute. There is a procedure, there is a regulation. Or do you propose breaking the law and increasing authority?
      http://base.garant.ru/1575717/15/#friends
  17. 0
    14 November 2017 15: 46
    Quote: SOF
    Quote: just explo
    let them be better silent than this nonsense
    Tie up panic and sprinkle populist slogans ...

    This is his goal on the forum, it is very similar to that.
    Do not shy away and lie directly. For example, pearls with the closure of the sky of Syria. None of the authorities in Russia have ever spoken about this. Let this miracle give the opposite quote. Can not.
    This character repeatedly raises a squeal here and makes a preoccupied look, exploiting negative populism.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"