Happy birthday, Comrade Trotsky!

46
Happy birthday, Comrade Trotsky!A strange picture could be seen the other day, on the anniversary of the "Great October Revolution", at the Novodevichy cemetery in Moscow. Several citizens of both sexes unfolded a kumachy banner with the inscription: “Happy birthday, Comrade Trotsky!” Since the graves of the said “comrade” killed, as is known, in Mexico with an ice pick by Soviet agent R. Mercader, they did not make it in the Russian capital this action at the graves of his revolutionary comrades-in-arms: Efraim Sklyansky and Adolf Ioffe.

As reported by the media, it was about activists of a certain Revolutionary Workers Party and members of the “End means the Beginning” community, who honored their idol with speeches, as well as laying flowers on the graves of his comrades. It was no coincidence that they congratulated Trotsky on his birthday, because, according to legend, it was on that day that Lev Bronstein allegedly personally appointed a coup in Petrograd.



Since Trotsky’s sympathizers turned out to be only a few people, then this action would probably not have been worth mentioning if it hadn’t for an event that was much more ambitious - a demonstration of the Trotsky series on the First State TV Channel. It seemed that it would be about historical a picture that will finally tell the whole truth about this evil "demon of revolution", as Trotsky was called back in those days, when not all the truth about his monstrous crimes was known. However, what the creators of the series showed to the Russian audience - directors Kott and Statsky, producers Ernst and Tsekalo could not be called a hangman of the Russian people. The film is large, retelling it and listing the historical absurdities shown in it can be a long time, and therefore - in a nutshell:

Trotsky made the revolution in Petrograd, he was also secured by the Bolsheviks in the Civil War, and Lenin and Stalin, depicted in the film as complete assholes, only interfered with his noble ideas, and then completely and insidiously ousted them from the USSR.

What, for example, is only one such characteristic scene for this film. Trotsky, who had just accomplished in Petrograd, without leaving his office, the October coup d'état meets in the corridor with Lenin.

- What have you done, Trotsky? - Ilyich asks him with the silliest kind.

- This is a revolution! - smiling indulgently, the wise Leo Davidovich explains to the near-far (according to the film) leader of the Bolshevik Party.

But if Lenin is frankly stupid in a film and can’t understand what this is about, then Stalin is depicted as a caricature monster, who now and then threatens black mustache menacingly.

Against his background, the evil maniac Trotsky, played by Khabensky, is an exemplary and caring family man, a tender husband, hurrying, despite urgent and great things, to the sick measles child, the very embodiment of kindness and humanism. But round fools and psychopaths, according to the picture, are not only Trotsky’s comrades in the party, but also the royal generals with whom he has to deal during the signing of the Peace of Brest. Those in general can do nothing, as soon as turn off vodka, and then shoot a bullet in the temple.

But with what genuine delight Trotsky is described in an advertisement for this film: “A serious and expensive TV series on the 100 anniversary of the revolution, telling about key and little-known episodes from the life of the most outstanding revolutionary of the 20th century. Trotsky is the core of the October Revolution 1917 of the year. With outstanding oratorical talent, iron determination and inexorable logic, Trotsky was a semblance of a nuclear power plant, from which all who had risen to fight against capitalism fueled. In 1917, 10 had enough minutes for him to make the royal regiment red and send him to a mortal battle ... ”

It is no coincidence homegrown liberals immediately greeted this film with enthusiasm. “I really like Trotsky.” This movie. This is a view free from ideology and stereotypes. Habensky brilliant. And young Stalin is such a recognizable future monster, ”Kseniya Larina, a recently-run radio station commentator from Russia, writes with admiration on Ekho Moskvy.

Of course, Trotsky played a prominent role in the seizure of power by the Bolsheviks — this is a well-known historical fact. The “direct leader” of the October revolution was named in the 1918 of Trotsky by Stalin himself, who then deftly outplayed him and destroyed him. “Undoubtedly, Leon Trotsky stands in many respects with many heads above other Bolsheviks, except Lenin. Lenin, of course, is bigger and stronger, he is the head of the revolution, but Trotsky is more talented and brilliant, ”wrote the Russian philosopher Nikolai Berdyaev. As Karl Radek argued, Trotsky "managed ... to instill the conviction that the Soviet government is a government fighting for the good of the Russian people." But how did Comrade Trotsky fight for this "good"?

What was this “demon of revolution” really? Where did he come from and how did he suddenly appear in revolutionary Petrograd right on the eve of the coup?

Hailing from the family of a wealthy landowner from the village of Yanovka, near Kherson, Leib Davidovich Bronstein, who later called himself Trotsky, did not receive a higher education. Not a single day in his life, like Lenin, he did not work in Russia. “Preparing a revolution” seemed to him a far more interesting and exciting affair. He rushed to power, but did not love Russia, he was despised by her people, considering it only as “material” for the coming world revolution. That is why soon I found myself abroad.

Especially mysterious is his stay in the United States. Who needed a young man there in shabby pants and with a furious mane of black hair from the village of Yanovka? It turned out that I needed. And very powerful people. As the German bankers at one time saw in Hitler someone who could save them from the communists, so did the talented orator Trotsky banker Jacob Schiff (this was Japan’s rearmament on his loan in 1905) and others saw someone who can help them to weaken rapidly A growing US economic rival - Russia. In detail about the American epic of Trotsky was told in the sensational documentary film-study of the TV channel “Russia” “Leon Trotsky. The Mystery of the World Revolution ”(director - G. Ogurnaya, scriptwriter - E. Chavchavadze). And even earlier - in the secret report of the American secret service, published in 1920 year in Paris.

It was Schiff’s “Kun, Löb and Company” banking house that decided to finance and later transfer Trotsky and his accomplices to Russia, so that they would rather start their destructive business.

As the German General Staff transferred Lenin to Petrograd in a “sealed wagon”, Trotsky was transferred from the United States to Russia.
For the coup in Petrograd needed money, and foreign backstage gave them to Lenin and Trotsky. It was with this money that the strikes were later financed, the regiments of mercenaries were paid - the Chinese and Latvians, who were guarding the first turbulent revolutionary days, first the Smolny and then the Kremlin, when the first Soviet government moved there.

The London publisher Della Lloyd, referring to the October revolution of the Bolsheviks, wrote: “Now it is clear to everyone that the revolution in Russia was not the result of an explosion of discontent among the masses, but was designed inside and outside Russia by its sworn enemies.”

The support of American bankers for revolutionaries in Russia is also confirmed in the United States. Thus, Richard Spence, a university professor in Idaho who studied the history of Trotsky’s stay in the United States, said in an interview with Radio Liberty: “Everything that Schiff did, he did in his own special interests. Long before the 17 year, he gained fame as a staunch opponent of the tsarist regime. He hated Emperor Nicholas and his regime - mainly for his policy towards Jews. He sought to express solidarity with his fellow believers in Russia and, because of the oppression that the regime repaired the Jews, abandoned business with the tsarist regime and tried to do everything possible to thwart Russian business in the United States. One example of this effort took place in 1912, when the US-Russian trade agreement expired and Congress did not renew it. It cannot be said that Schiff achieved this alone, but he definitely used all his influence to achieve this. Another story, perhaps even more so, concerns Trotsky. During the Russo-Japanese War, Schiff found an opportunity to demonstrate his opposition to the tsarist regime. He arranged a big loan for Japan, which she urgently needed. This does not mean that without this money there would have been no war, but without it, Japan would have been much more difficult, if not impossible, to finance the war. In addition, Schiff paid for the printing and distribution of tens of thousands of copies of anti-czarist leaflets among Russian prisoners of war in Japan from his personal funds ... This tells us that, firstly, he hated the tsarist regime and acted as his opponent, and secondly, that he willingly subsidized revolutionary propaganda and revolutionary activity. So there is no reason why he should not help Trotsky. ”

Just a week after the Tsar’s abdication, Trotsky gave an interview to the American newspaper The New York Times, where he accurately predicted the further course of the revolution: “... The Committee that took the place of the deposed cabinet of ministers in Russia (the Provisional Government was initially called the“ Committee ”- V.M. .) does not represent the interests or goals of revolutionaries; so, in all likelihood, it will not last long and will give way to people who will be more confident in democratizing Russia. ” What "democratization" he had in mind is now well known.

By the way, with what documents did Comrade Trotsky arrive in Petrograd? It turns out - with an American passport in your pocket! He was given to him by US President Woodrow Wilson himself.
This American passport included a visa for entry into Russia and a British transit visa.

Jennings C. Weiss in the book “Woodrow Wilson: A Pupil of the Revolution” makes a relevant comment: “Historians should never forget that Woodrow Wilson, despite opposition from the British police, gave Lev Trotsky the opportunity to enter Russia with an American passport.”

Lev Davidovich went to Russia on the ship “Christianafjord”. Along the way, in the Canadian port of Halifax, he and his family were removed from the ship by the English authorities and sent to a concentration camp for interned sailors of a German merchant fleet. The reason for the detention was the lack of Russian documents, as well as the fear of the British that Trotsky would facilitate Russia's withdrawal from the war. Soon, however, at the written request of the Provisional Government, Trotsky was released as an honored fighter against tsarism and continued on his way to Russia through Sweden and Finland.

4 May 1917 Trotsky arrived in Petrograd. At the border station (at that time) with Finland, the Beloostrov station was met by a delegation from the Social Democratic faction of the “united internationalists” and the Bolshevik Central Committee. Straight from the Finnish railway station went to the Petrosoviet meeting, where, in memory of the fact that he was already the chairman of the Petrograd Soviet in 1905, he was given a seat with an advisory vote.

How? Why? The reason is simple: in order to organize a business, you need money. And Trotsky, abundantly supplied by US bankers, had them. Of course, then all this information about the “money for the revolution” was thoroughly destroyed, like all those who knew at least something about it.

After the seizure of power, Trotsky, who had no higher education, unexpectedly found himself in the post of foreign affairs commissioner. And here he immediately repaid his overseas owners: he published all the secret international treaties of the tsarist government.


Then it was time to destroy Russia from the inside. And Trotsky is on the post of chairman of the Revolutionary Military Council. Creates by the most brutal measures the Red Army, with frenzied energy is worn on all fronts of the Civil War.

He did not go into the trenches, but moved in a special train, about which legends were told. These were 1-class passenger cars and royal saloon cars. In addition to the headquarters, Trotsky’s train housed its secretariat, telegraph, power station, library, printing house, and bathhouse. The staff of the "servants" consisted of 250 people, including Latvian riflemen, personal security, drivers and traveling workers. In addition, the royal car-garage was included. (Trotsky had several luxury cars, and at times even two aircraft). The train contingent (the so-called “trainers”) were given high salaries and leather uniforms with a large metal sign on the left sleeve, specially minted at the Mint.

The train even had a special gift store: gold watches, cigarette cases, precious rings, brooches, etc. (confiscated from the "bourgeoisie"), which were issued only by personal order of Trotsky. An orchestra met him without fail at each station, and a meeting was held at which Lev Davidovich practiced eloquence.

For the train, the specialty chocolates “Truffles”, “Apple flap”, caramel “Parfe”, total 180 pounds 35 pounds. This issue was made even in August 1919, when the train was laid up in Moscow at the Nikolayevsky railway station. And at that time, a threatening situation was created on the fronts of the Civil War, and famine raged in the country.

In the notes of the engineer V.E. Strictly quoted are the "Couplets about the military commissar Trotsky" from the satirical opera Orpheus in the Garden, staged in Kiev in 1919 (with the whites).

And someone lived in a saloon car,
Just like the old king on the throne.
In the luxurious bath immediately shaved,
Then he sat down for lunch.
Four chefs always
Labor wrestler
Lunch cooked!

At the same time, Lev Davidovich did not forget about his main task.

The destruction machine of the old Russia earned full power long before the tragic 1937 year, when it collapsed on the very creators of the revolution.

Trotsky, namely Lenin, was its main creator and ideologist. He is the author of cannibalistic orders for the mass destruction of "counterrevolutionaries" and the shooting of hostages, he is the founder of the first concentration camps (order number XXUMX). It was he, and not Stalin, who was the first to introduce detachments in the Red Army, mercilessly shooting the retreating from machine guns. It was Trotsky, not Dzerzhinsky, who was also the creator of the Cheka. At least, the very idea of ​​this punitive organ belonged to Lev Davidovich.

If Lenin wrote secret little notes about the "mass character" of terror, then Trotsky spoke about this, not hesitating, from the stands. So, speaking in the 1918 year in Kursk before the rallies, the chairman of the Revolutionary Military Council, Trotsky, said: “How can we compensate for our inexperience? Remember, comrades, only by terror! Terror consistent and merciless. If until now we have destroyed hundreds and thousands, then now is the time to create an organization, an apparatus, which, if needed, will be able to destroy tens of thousands. We have no time, no opportunity to seek out our active enemies. We are forced to take the path of extermination, of the physical of all classes, of all groups of the population, from which possible enemies of our power can emerge ... ”

And then he added even more cynically: "... patriotism, love for the motherland and its people ... what value are these empty words before a similar program that is already being implemented and uncompromisingly put into practice".

And here’s another cannibalistic statement by Trotsky: “If, as a result of the revolution, 90% of the Russian people perishes, but at least 10% remains alive and follows our path, we will assume that the experience of building communism has justified itself.”

As a result of the "experiment" of Trotsky-Lenin after the "Great October Revolution" from 1918 to 1922. Russia's population decreased by 15,1 million. Millions of engineers, doctors, teachers, professors, qualified officials, priests, cadre Russian officers — heroes of the war with Germany, working peasants, gymnasium students — the best people of Russia, its backbone, died. From this unprecedented pogrom in world history, the ideologist and inspirer of which was “the talented and brilliant creator of the revolution, Trotsky,” as he is represented in the film of the First Channel, our country cannot recover until now.

By the way - this is the irony of fate. As we have already written, the revolutionary Trotsky arrived in Russia from the United States on a steamer and immediately began to “make a revolution” with Vladimir Ilyich. And he left the country sent by Stalin, in 1929, too, by sea - on a steamer called "Ilyich". Back this evil genius of Russia has never returned ...
46 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +12
    12 November 2017 20: 04
    I agree with the assessment of the author of the film "Trotsky". The film is one-sided and odious. And why is someone trying to create such an image of Trotsky now I do not understand.
    1. +17
      12 November 2017 20: 15
      What is not clear .. again, the Yakovlevsky principle.
      If I. Stalin is popular in the country, then it is necessary to disavow Lenin through Trotsky. Who benefits ... all the same to those who are behind the backs of brewery svanidz and others like them.
      But this is already wonderful.
      The destruction of Russian statehood occurred in February, and not in October 1917, said Vyacheslav Nikonov, chairman of the State Duma’s Committee on Education and Science, doctor of historical sciences, November 7, during the presentation of his new book October 1917 on the Russia Today television channel.


      The scientist noted that the Provisional Government could not remain in power due to the fact that, on the one hand, it destroyed all existing state institutions and statehood as such, and on the other, did not offer anything in return. “The interim government fell because of ideological barrenness,” Nikonov said. “Actually, the whole ideology was formulated in one word - to bring the country to the constituent assembly, continuing the war.” Https: //cont.ws/@lapsha71/766276
      1. +9
        13 November 2017 05: 41
        Quote: badens1111 If I. Stalin is popular in the country, then Lenin must be disavowed through Trotsky.

        MV Popov, once said that in order to discredit the communist movement, they first "beat Lenin against Stalin, and now they beat Stalin against Lenin." We can say that the results of such an ideological sabotage did not bring proper results, and therefore they are trying to introduce another character, Lev Davidovich. He, de and accomplished the Revolution, and the Red Army created, and many, many, many. But, in my opinion, this is an ongoing bacteriological war. Trying to introduce another virus. Yes, and this article is the same.
        As a result of the "experiment" of Trotsky-Lenin after the "Great October" from 1918 to 1922. Russia's population decreased by 15,1 million people.

        Where do these numbers come from? Even researchers in the West give out figures in 12 millions, and even then they are more likely to exaggerate, not reduce. Moreover, they do, it's simple. They take the number of the population of the Republic of Ingushetia before the WWII, take away the losses in this war and compare it with 1922 year. Everything is simple. It’s just without the Principality of Finland, without the Kingdom of Poland, without the epidemic of the “Spanish woman” who would have taken her “share” without the Civil War in Russia. It is estimated that influenza victims in Russia are estimated at 3 million people. But the author, of course, knows better. He has exact numbers. Viral
        1. +1
          16 November 2017 20: 47
          Like no one watched a movie! Take a look and get rich! Over unexpected passages!
          1. 0
            16 November 2017 20: 58
            Quote: Reptiloid
            Like no one watched a movie! Take a look and get rich! Over unexpected passages!

            Naturally, I don’t look ... And it says that his son was also shot, but with a delay? He was a good engineer.
            1. 0
              17 November 2017 05: 37
              Maybe ..... if only in the form of grotesque memories? ... But I think not. Honestly, not all people are well known to me. And some do not. But why Freud? And also visions? What would the young be interested in, or something.
    2. +6
      12 November 2017 20: 18
      Quote: svp67
      And why is someone trying to create such an image of Trotsky now I do not understand.

      Well, at first Stalin pushed Trotsky with his "short course", and now other forces are trying to push Stalin and put Trotsky forward. But why? To the fans of Stalin?
    3. avt
      +9
      12 November 2017 21: 48
      Quote: svp67
      And why is someone trying to create such an image of Trotsky now I do not understand.

      bully Do not make people funny! ALL liberals are supporters of a permanent revolution ... from the word in general, without reference to ideology. This is the same time. The second - in the USA, an entire generation in power in a turbulent youth, along with sex, drags, rok in roll, were jammed by the Trotskyist ideas in their circles. Well, ours, grandchildren and even grandchildren, “commissars in dusty helmets,” reassured by the Friend of all the fiscalists, can easily settle their accounts with the deceased. Look and get a picture of Chubais at Trotsky’s grave in Mexico. adoration.
      Quote: svp67
      The film is one-sided and odious.

      look for at least some historical facts in it .... well, all that’s one is to study giztoria according to Akunin-Cherteshvili. bully
  2. +24
    12 November 2017 20: 11
    Thanks to Comrade Mercader for the ice ax!
    1. +5
      12 November 2017 20: 20
      Quote: solzh
      Thanks to Comrade Mercader for the ice ax!

      The ice ax had to be waved in October 17th, and in August 40th it was already too late.
      1. +9
        12 November 2017 20: 25
        Quote: verner1967
        The ice ax had to be waved in October 17th, and in August 40th it was already too late.

        Not in October, but in February 1917 ... In October, it was too late to do this ...
        1. 0
          13 November 2017 11: 18
          Quote: svp67
          Not in October, but in February 1917 ...

          I agree that the sooner the better. In this case, you need to get deeper into the story
          1. +4
            13 November 2017 11: 27
            Quote: verner1967
            In this case, you need to get deeper into the story

            Who's stopping you from studying it?
            Returning to Trotsky and a number of revolutionaries from the Pale of Settlement, the following is worth noting.
            All who claim that the revolution is the work of the ethnically painted groups that manipulated the Russian people, essentially act as Russophobes. Including, for the elementary reason that tens of thousands of Russian noblemen - and officers, are considered - objects of manipulation of several hundred descendants of artisans and shopkeepers.

            Recall that the post of commander in chief of all the Armed Forces of the Soviet Republic held Sergey Sergeevich Kamenev - career officer, graduated from the General Staff Academy in 1907, colonel of the Imperial Army.

            From July 1919 until the end of the Civil War, he held the post that Stalin would occupy during the Great Patriotic War.

            Head of the Field Staff of the Red Army - Pavel Pavlovich Lebedev, also a hereditary nobleman, rose to the rank of Major General of the Imperial Army.
            1. +1
              13 November 2017 12: 05
              Quote: badens1111 All who claim that the revolution is the work of the ethnically painted groups that manipulated the Russian people are, in fact, in the role of Russophobia.

              And as a confirmation of your thoughts, you can get acquainted with the famous Russophobe and anti-Soviet. Part of Speech W. Churchill in the House of Representatives on 5 on November 1919, where he said the following: “There is no need to underestimate the role played in the creation of Bolshevism and genuine participation in the Russian revolution by international Jewish atheists. Moreover, the main inspiration and driving force comes from the Jewish leaders. In Soviet institutions, the predominance of Jews is more than surprising, and the main part in the implementation of the terror system established by the emergency Commission to Counter-Revolution was carried out by Jews and, in some cases, Jews. The same diabolical fame was achieved by the Jews during the terror period when Bela Kun ruled Hungary. It seems that the gospel of Christ and the preaching of the Antichrist were destined to be born in the bowels of one and the same people, and that this mystical and mysterious race was chosen for the highest manifestations of both the divine and the devil .... A worldwide conspiracy to overthrow culture and remake society on the principles of stopping rogress, envious malice and unimaginable equality continued to grow continuously. He (the conspiracy) was the main spring of all the subversive movements of the 19 century; and, finally, now this gang of unusual personalities, scum of the big cities of Europe and America, grabbed the hair of the Russian people in their hands, in fact becoming the undivided master of a vast empire. There is no need to exaggerate the role of these international and mostly godless Jews in creating Bolshevism and in conducting the Russian revolution. "Their role is undoubtedly very large, probably it significantly outweighs the role of everyone else."
              Reading some comments of the "patriots", I would like to ask: "Do you really think that the" old fox "was at least a little sympathetic to our country?" Maybe the enemy who so hates your patriot Homeland, be the source of your worldview?
      2. +2
        12 November 2017 20: 32
        I agree with you. In 17, the ice ax had to be used. There is only one but! Who, then, knew that Trotsky would turn out to be a beast in human form?
        1. +1
          12 November 2017 20: 58
          Quote: solzh
          I agree with you. In 17, the ice ax had to be used. There is only one but! Who, then, knew that Trotsky would turn out to be a beast in human form?

          Yes, everyone always knows what’s what.
          I remember a joke we had in 1988 ..
          KGB officers catch a man who puts up leaflets ... When asked why the leaflets are clean, the man replies: "... Why write, why? And so everyone knows everything and what's going on too."
  3. +5
    12 November 2017 20: 15
    Trotsky performed by Khabensky is an exemplary and caring family man, a gentle husband, hurrying, despite urgent and great things, to a child with measles, the very embodiment of kindness and humanism.
    the author himself watched a movie? I am not a fan of Trotsky, as well as all the other "professional revolutionaries", but why lie? Trotsky in this film just does not look like an exemplary family man; behind this revolution he did not see anyone, neither people, nor family. Although in life he really loved his wife.
    1. 0
      13 November 2017 16: 05
      A man who loves his wife will not cheat on her, and Trotsky cheated on his wife and this is a historical fact.
      1. 0
        13 November 2017 18: 43
        Quote: RUSS
        A man who loves his wife will not cheat on her

        but it is not
        Quote: RUSS
        fact.
  4. +5
    12 November 2017 20: 31
    He did not go into the trenches, but moved in a special train, about which legends were told. These were 1-class passenger cars and royal saloon cars. In addition to the headquarters, Trotsky’s train housed its secretariat, telegraph, power station, library, printing house, and bathhouse. The staff of the "servants" consisted of 250 people, including Latvian riflemen, personal security, drivers and traveling workers. In addition, the royal car-garage was included. (Trotsky had several luxury cars, and at times even two aircraft). The train contingent (the so-called “trainers”) were given high salaries and leather uniforms with a large metal sign on the left sleeve, specially minted at the Mint.
    The train even had a special gift store: gold watches, cigarette cases, precious rings, brooches, etc. (confiscated from the "bourgeoisie"), which were issued only by personal order of Trotsky. An orchestra met him without fail at each station, and a meeting was held at which Lev Davidovich practiced eloquence.
    For the train, the specialty chocolates “Truffles”, “Apple flap”, caramel “Parfe”, total 180 pounds 35 pounds. This issue was made even in August 1919, when the train was laid up in Moscow at the Nikolayevsky railway station. And at that time, a threatening situation was created on the fronts of the Civil War, and famine raged in the country.


    I read about Trotsky's train for a very long time in the VIZH. There, in great detail, with the publication of documents, it is written. I sincerely recommend ... These are the 9 and 12 numbers for the 1990 year and the 11 numbers for the 1991 year. It is easy to find and read on the website "Military Literature" under the heading "periodicals"
    I can’t say anything about the film, I didn’t look and didn’t intend to ... From the already repeated examples I learned a long time ago that the more “cod” and chatter, aggressive advertising, promises that all the historical realities of that time (up to matchboxes) were observed during the production of the film ), the film can be safely not watched. You are waiting for the next batch of filth and dirt ....
    1. 0
      13 November 2017 10: 05
      I just wrote out the VIZH in those years and I remember the article well. And there were also two articles about Jews: “Together with Lenin” and “Together with Stalin” about their fellow members from among the God-chosen. There is no analyst, only a list of names, ranks and positions!
  5. +1
    12 November 2017 20: 32
    ".... They can’t do anything at all, as soon as they drown out the vodka, and then let themselves in the temple ...."
    What a filthy slander to General V.E. Skalon ("military specialist" at that time).
    https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A1%D0%BA%D0%B0%
    D0%BB%D0%BE%D0%BD,_%D0%92%D0%BB%D0%B0%D0%B4%D0%B8
    %D0%BC%D0%B8%D1%80_%D0%95%D0%B2%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B0
    %D1%84%D1%8C%D0%B5%D0%B2%D0%B8%D1%87
  6. +6
    12 November 2017 20: 57
    Trotsky is a superstar. This is Ernst’s know-how, eprst.
    1. +1
      13 November 2017 19: 00
      Yeah, with sash.
  7. +13
    12 November 2017 21: 07
    The film is a perversion of history. V. Malyshev forgot to add that the Bronstein’s Labor arrived on instructions from US Jewry with a group of militants. They helped Leiba lead the Petrosoviet for the collapse of Russia. The film for morons for folk money. It is not clear where the Government is looking to finance this dirty trick. I have the honor.
    1. +4
      12 November 2017 22: 43
      Quote: midshipman
      ..Leiba Bronstein arrived on assignment from US Jewry with a group of militants. They helped Leiba lead the Petrosoviet for the collapse of Russia. Movie for morons for folk money.

      I partially agree with you. But there is one thing but! Leiba Bronstein (later, with the change of surname - Trotsky) for the first time headed the Petrosoviet back in 1905, becoming the second chairman in history. In both cases, fin. circles elected the chairman, and not anyone else, from the side. In both cases, he became chairman on their instructions, and one should never forget that all, absolutely all political parties were funded by bankers and in most cases from abroad. These are the features of political life in the country, and not only in ours, but in almost all countries. If this is taken into account, then clarity is significantly added to the political life of the country, and naturally not only of our country.
      1. +2
        13 November 2017 00: 24
        Quote: venaya
        In both cases, he became chairman on their instructions, and one should never forget that all, absolutely all political parties were funded by bankers and in most cases from abroad. These are the features of political life in the country, and not only in ours, but in almost all countries.

        Correctly. It is best to fish in muddy water. Especially if it's "Goldfish."
    2. +2
      13 November 2017 00: 23
      "assigning US Jewry with a group of militants. They helped Leiba to lead the Petrosoviet for the collapse of Russia." ////

      By the collapse of Russia do you mean the armed uprising in Petrograd, organized by Trotsky? Are you an anti-Bolshevik?
    3. +8
      13 November 2017 05: 26
      The oligarch of the Russian Federation is looking where he needs to. To show in the film the connection between Trotsky and the owners of the Fed was not comme il faut. But to dishonor Lenin and Stalin just right.
  8. +3
    12 November 2017 21: 09
    The truth is always somewhere in the middle, that Trotsky’s role in the revolution was devalued and Lenin’s role was somewhat exaggerated, it’s a fact that Stalin did it because he’s still Lenin’s man, it’s also a fact, it’s normal, it’s the winner of the struggle for power and history, but hints that in the event of Trotsky’s victory everything would have been better this is nonsense, Trotsky was obsessed with the international and he would burn the country in the furnace of his idea of ​​world revolution, and Stalin did not steal anything from Trotsky, he took it away in the fight against him as equal if not a stronger rival but these are different things
  9. +9
    12 November 2017 21: 19
    to every Trotsky, along the ice ax!
    1. +6
      12 November 2017 23: 47
      Alas! In the USSR there was a shortage of ice axes. Comrade Stalin let all the metal into the tanks and tractors. This is still his omission, I must admit. Not to make a couple of thousand extra ice axes, this is of course a jamb. wink
      And now these ... would not go to the Novodevichy cemetery.
  10. +1
    12 November 2017 22: 36
    Quote: verner1967
    Quote: solzh
    Thanks to Comrade Mercader for the ice ax!

    The ice ax had to be waved in October 17th, and in August 40th it was already too late.

    А
    Quote: svp67
    I agree with the assessment of the author of the film "Trotsky". The film is one-sided and odious. And why is someone trying to create such an image of Trotsky now I do not understand.

    As the authors say: "This is a work of art," that is, it makes no sense to search for truth and meaning here.
  11. +1
    13 November 2017 00: 21
    Quote: midshipman
    The film is a perversion of history. V. Malyshev forgot to add that the Bronstein’s Labor arrived on instructions from US Jewry with a group of militants. They helped Leiba lead the Petrosoviet for the collapse of Russia. The film for morons for folk money. It is not clear where the Government is looking to finance this dirty trick. I have the honor.

    What kind of collapse are you talking about, all that could have been collapsed.
    But it touches another ... Everyone who blames the Bolsheviks for something, for this, the differambs sing to the liberals.
  12. +6
    13 November 2017 04: 20
    Quote: svp67
    I agree with the assessment of the author of the film "Trotsky". The film is one-sided and odious. And why is someone trying to create such an image of Trotsky now I do not understand.

    Why is it incomprehensible if you recall the representative of which tribe is Trotsky, Ernst, Tsekalo. Remind the goyim who turned them, as he wanted, despite the autocracy, the church, etc. Yes, at the same time and warn that it is not yet evening, everything can be repeated! As in the 90s, for example, when evil spirits climbed out again and robbed Russia again! This is their idol, oh how they still hate Stalin for this ghoul ...
  13. +2
    13 November 2017 04: 23
    Quote: mavrus
    Quote: verner1967
    Quote: solzh
    Thanks to Comrade Mercader for the ice ax!

    The ice ax had to be waved in October 17th, and in August 40th it was already too late.

    А
    Quote: svp67
    I agree with the assessment of the author of the film "Trotsky". The film is one-sided and odious. And why is someone trying to create such an image of Trotsky now I do not understand.

    As the authors say: "This is a work of art," that is, it makes no sense to search for truth and meaning here.

    These words are the usual Zionist hypocrisy to hide the true purpose.
    1. dSK
      +3
      13 November 2017 07: 53
      Quote: Evrodav
      These words are the usual Zionist hypocrisy to hide the true purpose.

      This is a standard Masonic strategy. "Divide and rule." Lodges are different and the puppeteer is the only customer. He rubs his hands and refills the gas tank. Very smart and tricky.
      The history of Freemasonry began 2000 years ago. Not all Jews are Jews; Christ was also a Jew. After the crucifixion of Christ, the Pharisees Jews exterminated his followers for 300 years, crucified them, burned them alive, poisoned them with lions, stripped their skin ... What defenseless people could oppose was only an unbending faith. The apostles, on which on the fiftieth day after the resurrection of Christ the "Holy Spirit" came down (the Orthodox celebrate the Trinity on this day) "fermented" as a result of half the world. (In the Gospel, faith is compared to sourdough.) After the destruction of Jerusalem by the Romans, Jews scattered throughout the world. The wealthy Jews, the Pharisees, moved to Italy and France, England and further North. America With the growing number of followers of Christ, the Jews are Pharisees, very smart and cunning people, fundamentally changed the fight strategy. They went underground and became pdestroy Christianity from within, crushing and setting Christians against each other. Christianity was divided into Catholics, Orthodox, Protestants, Lutherans, etc. Sects in general can not be counted. The leaders of the Jews - the Pharisees (they still believe that Christ was correctly crucified by their ancestors as a heretic) in France organized the first Masonic lodges, at first they were called hospitaliers, then the Illuminati, free masons and now change their names. The same story in the Islamic world: Sunites, Shiites, Alawites are biting with each other. Israel realizes its “over the task” - to restore the temple of Solomon in its former place (they are preparing the coming of the Messiah). To do this, "remove" the Muslim mosque. It has long been proposed to carefully "cut" and transfer to another place. Muslims do not agree yet, and the region is blazing ...
  14. 0
    13 November 2017 06: 01
    “How can we compensate for our inexperience? Remember, comrades, only terror! Terror is consistent and merciless. If so far we have destroyed hundreds and thousands, now it is time to create an organization, an apparatus that, if necessary, can destroy tens of thousands. ....

    from the memoirs of Ratiev A. L. Descendant of the Russian branch of the ancient Georgian family Ratishvili. In December 1918, when he was in Kursk, a twenty-year-old youth attended a meeting of a party activist on the occasion of the arrival in the city of the chairman of the Revolutionary Military Council, one of the leaders of the October Revolution, L. Trotsky.
    From the memoirs, "be kind, slow down, I write."
  15. 0
    13 November 2017 06: 17
    It was precisely Trotsky who, along with Lenin, was its main creator and ideologist. He is the author of cannibalistic orders for the mass extermination of "counterrevolutionaries" and for the shooting of hostages, he is the founder of the first concentration camps (order No.31).

    One of the main and enduring myths to emphasize the irrational “inhumanity” of the Red Commissars.
    During the Civil War, the first concentration camps were created in 1918 by the British on the island of Mudyug and in Yokang Bay. They put it there suspected in sympathy for the communists. A study conducted by the Yokang Council of Deputies after the fall of the Northern Region showed that of the 1200 prisoners who visited the dungeons of Yokang, only 20 people belonged to the Communist Party, the rest were non-partisan. Of these 1200 people, 23 people were shot, 310 died of scurvy and typhoid, and only 100 people remained more or less healthy. Not only in Russia did the British organize concentration camps. So, in September 1919, 47 people were loaded into the hold of an English vessel, taken to England and placed in the Whitley Bay concentration camp.
  16. The comment was deleted.
  17. 0
    13 November 2017 06: 38
    According to Karl Radek, Trotsky "managed to ... convince that the Soviet government is a government fighting for the good of the Russian people."

    According to Lev Davidovich Trotsky, Radek "speaks seriously only as an exception" and "has an organic tendency to correct reality, because in its raw form it is not always suitable for jokes." And also, “Radek is one of the professional wits and storytellers of jokes. By this I do not want to say that he has no other virtues ... Usually he does not talk about events, but sets out a witty feuilleton about them. ”
    ps In short, the whole article is a set of myths, legends and jokes about the Revolution, L.D. Trotsky, RCP (b). Thanks to the author for such a serious work. bully
  18. +1
    13 November 2017 07: 04
    “The story of Trotsky’s American epic was described in detail in the sensational documentary film“ Russia ”TV channel“ Lev Trotsky. The Secret of the World Revolution ”(director - G. Ogurnaya, script - E. Chavchavadze). Recently I watched a program on the SPAS channel with this Chavchavadze - there she was struck by completely inadequate statements that the revolutionaries paid with Japanese money prevented Russia from winning the Russo-Japanese War! Chavchavadze simply erased all the defeats of the Russian army in this war, as if they were not there!
  19. +17
    13 November 2017 09: 20
    Horrible outside and inside, a real demon of the Russian revolution
  20. +15
    13 November 2017 18: 07
    Sleep well dear comrade wassat
  21. +1
    13 November 2017 22: 21
    You are writing about a work of art. The film is exaggeratedly accented for, for example, you- like personal memories and sensations (it’s not for nothing that Freud was slapped) -but you stubbornly “stupid”, or just flipped through the rewind. And most importantly, the film is an attempt to simplistically explain to the current schoolboy how an ordinary person becomes a Beast. Nor is there any “Trotskyism” here.
  22. +4
    14 November 2017 09: 34
    Truly Russia is a country with an unpredictable history. They are trying to turn the October Revolution into some kind of Jewish farce, as if power in the country could be seized as a bank, with the help of a group of armed raiders. And the fact that a monstrous centuries-old tension in the country and a deep crisis of power led to the revolution, this remains behind the scenes. Whatever the speaker, Trotsky or Lenin, they could not in their own words inspire millions of people to die for their beliefs, for a new life. The role of the individual is great, but historical processes are much stronger.
  23. 0
    15 November 2017 11: 51
    I studied history even under the Soviet system of education, because to me, the image of the same Trotsky in the film is simply interesting how it will be presented to me by our “bonzes” of the first channel. (Although not to say that the image of Trotsky under the previous system of education was already very much covered). Conclusions from the film can be made of course different, but we read the primary sources, the Lord)))) Here there is where to unfold, and what to discuss.
  24. 0
    16 November 2017 12: 13
    well, Leo Trotsky and comrade Lenin came to power, as I believe, largely thanks to the actions and without the actions of the now "saint" Nicholas II as well as to persons from the aristocratic elite, the bourgeoisie, the pseudo liberal cadets who forced the Tsar to "resign," thereby the branch (rotten but still) on which they sat .. and having come to power, they shaved everything that could be shaved for half a year of their stay, both in the military economic and political spheres. Well, the Bolshevik comrades are tough and practical people. the fact that stupid people could not be kept by monarchists and liberalists. what about German money? hmm if they were .. also in ancient Rome, one emperor said they didn’t smell. they are needed for revolution, they did! they are needed to seize power .. captured! take the whole country .. took it! well, what’s going to say everything went wrong didn’t drink and didn’t go for a walk. And whoever swore allegiance to the king bowed to him, kissed his image and then overthrew him in February 17, tell them “thank you” for red, terror for citizens war and so on.
  25. 0
    31 January 2018 16: 05
    ... Trotsky was an enemy of the Russian People ... it is not so clear ... how many more "five-columnists" and "liberoids" will they "kiss"? ....