Military Review

Is NATO preparing Europe for the Russian invasion?

38
European roads, bridges and railway networks should be suitable for transport tanks and heavy military equipment, said NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg. It is reported InoTV with reference to the Daily Mail newspaper.




During a press conference in Brussels, Stoltenberg said that "NATO needs a command structure to make sure that the alliance has the right forces, they are in the right place, with the right equipment and at the right time."

This concerns not only the command structure. We also need to make sure that the roads and bridges are strong enough to support our largest vehicles, and that the railway networks will allow us to quickly transfer tanks and heavy weapons,
added the secretary general.

According to him, the alliance "has military requirements" for civilian infrastructure, which "needs to be updated so that today's military needs are taken into account."

But NATO alone cannot cope with this work. It requires close cooperation between governments and the private sector. The European Union also plays an important role. Therefore, NATO and the EU should continue to work closely on this vital issue,
noted Stoltenberg.

He also stressed that all NATO countries "should be able to fight cyber attacks as effectively as attacks from land, sea or air."
Photos used:
http://www.globallookpress.com
38 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. sergey32
    sergey32 10 November 2017 10: 58 New
    +2
    What should they be convinced of? Did they build their communications without military transport? Or their military equipment does not take into account the possibility of civilian infrastructure?
    1. Anarchist
      Anarchist 10 November 2017 11: 02 New
      12
      Well done, rebuild, check ... They think that on good roads we can’t fight?
      1. 210ox
        210ox 10 November 2017 11: 03 New
        +2
        We are fighting without roads. And how is it with NATO?
        Quote: Anarchist
        Well done, rebuild, check ... They think that on good roads we can’t fight?
        1. Tatyana
          Tatyana 10 November 2017 11: 05 New
          +4
          Many ordinary Europeans understand that it smells like kerosene! That the Pentagon is driving NATO countries to war precisely on their territory - with Russia. Only they, ordinary citizens, cannot do anything. The comprador governments of NATO countries have long handed over their fellow citizens to Washington for money - in general, they sold all of them to Willington!
          1. Logall
            Logall 10 November 2017 11: 10 New
            12
            Tatyana, that's what we were talking about in the morning!
            Fuel is already spilled, it remains to throw a match ...
            Like Bulgakov: '' Annushka bought oil and managed to spill it ... '' - the quote is inaccurate ...
            1. Tatyana
              Tatyana 10 November 2017 11: 15 New
              +2
              Right, Alexander!
              The Pentagon only has to clean all corners in Europe for convenience, so that all the nooks and crannies of Europe have better fuel flow.
              1. Lelek
                Lelek 10 November 2017 13: 29 New
                +1
                Quote: Tatiana
                The Pentagon only needs to clean all corners in Europe


                Hey. And they succeed. Moldova has already been actively squeezing "under the banner of the Duke of Cumberland":
          2. Antianglosax
            Antianglosax 10 November 2017 12: 13 New
            +1
            Ghouls mobilization has not yet begun among the geyropecy, who are eager to die for amerotivotami? wink
            It is unclear what is the point - in an attack or provocation against Russia by any of the Nata’s countries, we will wet the Americans and Englishmen.
        2. Jedi
          Jedi 10 November 2017 11: 10 New
          +9
          Quote: 210ox
          We are fighting without roads. And how is it with NATO?

          Yes, like this:

          Or so:
          1. 210ox
            210ox 10 November 2017 11: 11 New
            +2
            Successfully landed on the coast?
            Quote: Jedi
            Quote: 210ox
            We are fighting without roads. And how is it with NATO?

            Yes, like this:

            Or so:
            1. Jedi
              Jedi 10 November 2017 11: 14 New
              +7
              Not without it. wink Accustomed to greenhouse conditions and a good highway.
              1. Logall
                Logall 10 November 2017 11: 24 New
                +9
                Quote: Jedi
                Not without it. wink Accustomed to greenhouse conditions and a good highway.

                And to warm toilets! Winter It’s hard to have ...
        3. LiSiCyn
          LiSiCyn 10 November 2017 12: 45 New
          +1
          And with NATO, everyone doesn’t))) a large number of bridges, different .. Secondary roads pass over the highways ... On the lands of the former East Prussia, the roads remained in it. Standards (to the military), that is, two the carts will be scattered .. But when you leave the truck with a bend, you’re out of habit belay Elblag, where, according to the statements, this crazy Matz ..... how will he be transferred to NATO headquarters, to be 40 km in a straight line from the border ... There are enough nomenclatures, RAVs in the region. I forgot to add, the slopes on the roads are steep, and on the old, the exit is limited, because of the closely growing trees ...
      2. The comment was deleted.
      3. juneart
        juneart 10 November 2017 14: 48 New
        +1
        Ha. I have a question too! : if they are waiting for our attack and advance into the depths of Europe, on the contrary, all bridges and communications must be blown up! To make it difficult to advance our troops! So?!
        And if they gathered to strengthen bridges and communications - it means they are gathered to the east!
    2. Vard
      Vard 10 November 2017 11: 02 New
      +3
      It seems that way ... in Poland, the Ambrams do not hold bridges ...
      1. Gnefredov
        Gnefredov 10 November 2017 11: 12 New
        +1
        Right To paraphrase - "not every bird will reach the middle of the Dnieper" we can say - "not every Abrams will reach the middle of the bridge."
        Ahhhhh !!! Good stuff and bul-bul ...
    3. The comment was deleted.
    4. 79807420129
      79807420129 10 November 2017 11: 30 New
      10
      Is NATO preparing Europe for the Russian invasion?

      Yeah, it just seems the other way around. NATO is preparing Europe for an invasion of Russia. yes
      1. Lelek
        Lelek 10 November 2017 13: 51 New
        +3
        Quote: 79807420129
        NATO prepares Europe to invade Russia.


        Hey. I will not dirty the paper:
    5. Sergey53
      Sergey53 10 November 2017 11: 34 New
      0
      When they built all this, the equipment was of average weight. And no one calculated that its weight would become extraordinary.
  2. Andrey Sukharev
    Andrey Sukharev 10 November 2017 10: 58 New
    +6
    Judging by the content of the article, NATO is preparing for an invasion of Russia, and not for our invasion of Europe.
    1. Vard
      Vard 10 November 2017 11: 03 New
      +1
      It seems they are aware that Russia will not attack them ... that’s not in a hurry ...
  3. private person
    private person 10 November 2017 11: 01 New
    +1
    Are Europeans so naive? They voluntarily become targets of the Strategic Missile Forces, and not what NATO will not help them.
  4. Maalkavianin
    Maalkavianin 10 November 2017 11: 10 New
    +1
    Yes, prepare. And our "express concern" ....
    1. bulvas
      bulvas 10 November 2017 11: 15 New
      0
      Quote: Malkavianin
      Yes, prepare. And our "express concern" ....


      Just woke up?
      Look around
  5. sir_obs
    sir_obs 10 November 2017 11: 14 New
    0
    Have you ordered striped pajamas in China? But this time we will not take prisoners.
  6. The comment was deleted.
  7. Masya masya
    Masya masya 10 November 2017 11: 16 New
    +5
    We also need to make sure that the roads and bridges are strong enough to support our largest vehicles, and that the railway networks will allow us to quickly transfer tanks and heavy weapons,

    Was he going to rebuild all of Europe there? recourse naive, quickly only cats will be born ... wink
  8. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 10 November 2017 11: 47 New
    0
    Is NATO preparing Europe for the Russian invasion?

    The point is small - finally really invade Europe. And the most interesting thing is that this will switch to simple Western verbal diarrhea, which means nothing to us.
    1. Lelek
      Lelek 10 November 2017 13: 46 New
      0
      Quote: rotmistr60
      And the most interesting thing is that this will switch to simple Western verbal diarrhea, which means nothing to us.


      Good day, Gennady.
      Diarrhea has already taken place. And you know what for? The Yankees refused to rotate their "berserkers" in the Baltic states and began to withdraw them from these territories (I assume that NATO proposed the palm of the "prima"). In this regard, our "former" hysteria (again, I assume that due to the loss of subsidies for the costs of deploying troops), turning into a squeal: "America threw us under Russian tanks." Smile condescendingly - id ... you. bully
    2. PPK
      PPK 11 November 2017 14: 20 New
      0
      Quote: rotmistr60
      The point is small - finally really invade Europe.

      Are you so indifferent to the lives of Russian people that you are ready to start a world war? Whose interests are you protecting?
  9. ROM1077
    ROM1077 10 November 2017 12: 11 New
    0
    Well let’s fight, it’s time to clear Europe from the American fascists
  10. Esoteric
    Esoteric 10 November 2017 12: 40 New
    +1
    Is NATO preparing Europe for the Russian invasion?

    Let them not dream. They themselves launched migrants there, spread tolerance and sodomy, and now they hope that Russia will come and clean their Augean Stables? Be content with Trump gas and US missile defense projects ... lol
  11. Victor-M
    Victor-M 10 November 2017 13: 03 New
    0
    Is NATO preparing Europe for the Russian invasion?

    This is in the sense of an invasion of Russian territory.
  12. Slovak
    Slovak 10 November 2017 13: 04 New
    0
    Is NATO ready to rebuild much of Europe? To lay down roads, demolish old ones and build new bridges, expand streets, raise flyovers, expand railway tracks and, accordingly, railway cars? So many US dollars will not print ....
  13. gromoboj
    gromoboj 10 November 2017 15: 27 New
    0
    Couch caps frolic. The war will be on our territory, as always.
    And witty comments do not defeat the enemy.
  14. PValery53
    PValery53 10 November 2017 17: 27 New
    0
    NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg is rushing out of turn so that Russia is the first to "cause trouble." Sorry, the soul requires "insert neologisms" ...
  15. stolz
    stolz 10 November 2017 19: 35 New
    0
    They are afraid, they mean respect, which is generally positive. Let yourself frolic and think about the throughput of our Crimean bridge.
  16. Vanek
    Vanek 11 November 2017 05: 47 New
    +1
    Us also necessary make sure roads and bridges are strong enough to support our largest vehicles,

    We, the Russians, have enough spruce branches. To put something in it.

    They spoke bridges, they spoke roads.
  17. Sands Careers General
    Sands Careers General 11 November 2017 20: 44 New
    +4
    But who needs Europe to conquer it? Only if as a response to aggression, as during the Second World War.