State Department was not surprised by the initiative of the Russian parliamentarians to return the base to Cuba

43
The representative of the US State Department Heather Nauert said that "not surprised" by the initiative of the Russian lawmakers, who offered to return the military bases to Cuba and Vietnam, reports RIA News.

State Department was not surprised by the initiative of the Russian parliamentarians to return the base to Cuba




I hear about it for the first time from you. It would not surprise me, this is my own opinion ... I will not speculate (on this topic),
said Nauert, answering the appropriate question.

Earlier, the head of the Defense Committee of the Federation Council, Viktor Bondarev, said that the deployment of a Russian military base in Cuba in the face of increasing US aggression would be in the interests of security.

I believe that the increase in tension in the world, open interference in the internal affairs of countries - historical Russia's partners does not rule out our return to Latin America. Of course, this must be agreed with the Cubans, the parliamentarian said.

In addition, according to Bondarev, Russia should also think about the return of its navy to Vietnam.

The same opinion is shared by the deputy head of the Defense Committee of the Federation Council, Franz Klintsevich.
  • lenta.ru/visitingdc.com
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

43 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +5
    10 November 2017 08: 25
    Earlier, the head of the Defense Committee of the Federation Council, Viktor Bondarev, said that the deployment of a Russian military base in Cuba in the face of increasing US aggression would be in the interests of security.

    It is a pity that this will remain in words.
    1. +11
      10 November 2017 08: 32
      The news that the adversary is not surprised! So he is ready for this! And that worries ...
      1. +4
        10 November 2017 08: 34
        And it surprises me that such a decision has not yet been made.
      2. +2
        10 November 2017 08: 44
        Logall .....News that the adversary is not surprised! So he is ready for this! And that worries ...

        "This is the first time I hear about this from you. It would not surprise me, this is my own opinion ... I will not speculate on this subject ..."

        Where is the "adversary." The psaki model did not understand what was at all about. fool
        1. The comment was deleted.
      3. +1
        10 November 2017 09: 06
        Therefore, if they are going to put something there, then it will be necessary to put something that will plunge them into shock. Attacks, chasing air, even from international stands, are at least ridiculous.
      4. +5
        10 November 2017 09: 30
        Quote: Logall
        The news that the adversary is not surprised! So he is ready for this! And that worries ...

        Well, if you decide to give someone in the face - you really will not be surprised if they give you an answer? so no wonder laughing hi Sanya hi
      5. +1
        10 November 2017 09: 33
        Quote: Logall
        The adversary is ready for this. And that worries ...
        \
        It was necessary to worry when the intelligence post in Lourdes was closed .. Then the "servants of the people" didn’t even blather, but now they woke up and were concerned about the problem of the Strategist, damn it ...
        .And the Yankees have long been ready for this since their base in Guantanamo, unlike us, was not closed and are not going to do it ... They settled there thoroughly, even opened a prison ...
      6. 0
        10 November 2017 11: 14
        Quote: Logall
        The news that the adversary is not surprised! So he is ready for this! And that worries ...

        The adversary’s territory of Cuba has been under the gun since the Caribbean crisis.
    2. +1
      10 November 2017 08: 40
      It is understandable. Shooting a missile from Cuba after launch is easier than ICBMs from Russia or a submarine with an unknown location. hi Cuba is more interesting for us for the location and port for the fleet with nuclear submarines. The rest is for an exotic vacation VIP officials and generals with their families.
      1. 0
        10 November 2017 09: 14
        It’s easier to shoot down a missile from Cuba after launch[i] [/ i] And we bullet at night)
      2. SOF
        0
        10 November 2017 09: 33
        Shooting a missile off Cuba after launch is easier than ICBMs

        ... who might think of launching ICBMs from Cuba that are easier to intercept?
        feel maybe the Iskanders?
      3. +1
        10 November 2017 10: 36
        Quote: siberalt
        Shooting a missile from Cuba after launch is easier than ICBMs from Russia or a submarine with an unknown location

        Well, it’s easier to shoot down their ICBMs in Cuba’s stadiums at the initial site, but the question is, what is it? But you might think about this issue ...
  2. +1
    10 November 2017 08: 30
    It's time to return to their bases in Cuba, Vietnam ... and at the same time create military bases in Venezuela, the Philippines
    1. +1
      10 November 2017 08: 44
      Every whim for your money!!! wink fellow --- a joke ....
    2. +1
      10 November 2017 11: 20
      Quote: Alexey-74
      It's time to return to their bases in Cuba, Vietnam ... and at the same time create military bases in Venezuela, the Philippines

      Well, yes, we wanted to and went to build a base. And the opinion of the Cubans, Vietnamese, Venezuelans ... were you interested in? What do they think about this? Do they need it?
  3. +3
    10 November 2017 08: 33
    ... I hope, the Representative of the US State Department, Heather Nauert, represents where these countries are located, because with the geography of the meerkatos - on a solid "deuce" ... bully
    1. +5
      10 November 2017 09: 35
      Quote: aszzz888
      ... I hope, the Representative of the US State Department, Heather Nauert, represents where these countries are located, because with the geography of the meerkatos - on a solid "deuce" ... bully

      He knows for sure - from Florida you can see laughing
    2. +5
      10 November 2017 09: 36
      Hi! hi
      Quote: aszzz888
      with the geography of the mericatos - on a solid "deuce"

      That you flatter them - count with a minus! lol
      This reaction of the representative of the State Department suggests that either they have already prepared "retaliatory" measures and provocations, or they believe that plans for bases in Cuba will not go further than the talking room.
      1. +2
        10 November 2017 12: 06
        Jedi Today, 09:36 This is you flattering them - count with a minus! lol

        Mine to you hi ! ... what they, in words deceased M. Zadornogo, (ofigel himself - just broadcast on TV - after a long illness - the earth rest in peace with him!) Here is TE, then there are a lot of count with a minus for merikatos ...
        1. +6
          10 November 2017 12: 19
          Your division! This guy did not. I am in shock and mourning ...
          1. +2
            10 November 2017 12: 23
            Jedi Today, 12: 19

            "Satirist Mikhail Zadornov died. This was reported by REN TV, with which Zadornov collaborated. He was 69 years old."
            ... like this - you live, you live ...
  4. +6
    10 November 2017 08: 33
    This is the first time I hear about this from you. It would not surprise me

    We were taken aback, I did not have time to get scared ...
    1. +4
      10 November 2017 08: 45
      Masya masya Today, 08:33 I did not have time to get scared...

      ... coffee smells of a loading dose, wakes up completely, and starts to sausage like a crow in a garbage dump ... bully
      1. +6
        10 November 2017 08: 50
        Quote: aszzz888
        ... coffee smells of a loading dose, wakes up completely, and starts to sausage like a crow in a garbage dump ...

        Or there is someone who will show on the map where Cuba is located, as if the jimmy will score ... lol
  5. +4
    10 November 2017 08: 40
    . Nauert said she was "not surprised" by the initiative of Russian lawmakers who proposed returning military bases to Cuba and Vietnam

    All this is written with a pitchfork on the water. Easy to leave, but much harder to come again. I'm not at all sure whether Cuba or Vietnam will agree to a military base? Why should they spoil relations with America? And then, and for what shishi Russia will build new bases, because these activities are not cheap! But we forgave the debts to these countries in advance ... We apparently decided to complicate the task of opening these very bases ourselves!
  6. +1
    10 November 2017 08: 47
    And really nothing surprising.
    If there is a program for the serious development of the fleet, there should be a program for ensuring the deployment of a fleet in the oceans.
    There will be no instant revival.
    It is necessary to systematically achieve your goals.
    Step by step.
    And “partners” / rivals will always be enough, this is not decisive.
  7. +2
    10 November 2017 09: 00
    Foreign bases are expensive, and all the money in the Russian Federation goes to amuse Rublevka, and the cat wept and there are hardly enough new warships in the Russian Federation for coastal defense. At least they would give money to them and put them on combat duty, now it’s naive to count on more . Until Yeltsin is buried in Russia, there will be no progress.
    1. FID
      +4
      10 November 2017 09: 59
      Quote: Nemesis
      Until Yeltsin is buried in Russia, there will be no progress.

      So, they buried for a long time, but one progress .... (hell) is not visible ... Apparently, the case of Yeltsin and his minions, lives and wins ...
      1. +2
        10 November 2017 10: 02
        Yeltsin will be buried only when there is no continuation of his policy and worship of the powerful
        1. FID
          +3
          10 November 2017 10: 58
          Well, I wrote about this ...
  8. +1
    10 November 2017 09: 29
    Heather Nauert said she was “not surprised” by the initiative of Russian lawmakers who proposed returning military bases to Cuba and Vietnam

    Does she know where Cuba and Vietnam are?
  9. 0
    10 November 2017 09: 49
    Actually, this is what they are waiting for ... They need it for a new speculation, for a new Cold War. But the question is, does Russia really need a base in Cuba? What for? So many billions of rubles to swell there, and then also support .. is not it easier to sail there on submarines? From the Atlantic and the Pacific? From the side of the Pacific Ocean it is possible to completely cover Americosia .. Well, firstly, the DPRK, secondly the PRC (if you agree, of course, but on the other hand the Americans also get them thoroughly), and thirdly our submarines. The path will be, as they say, in good shape. You look and it will be less to enter on corners.

    What is the point in the database? When does it stand only in one place, and can submarines float in any place? And after all there is no need to swim back to back!
  10. 0
    10 November 2017 10: 24
    And who said that there is nothing in Cuba? "CLUB-K" for example?
  11. +6
    10 November 2017 10: 54
    The point at the mattresses will definitely play when we really return to Cuba. I want to assume that it will be so.
    1. 0
      10 November 2017 12: 20
      You are so sure, but I’m more confident that these statements by Russian officials are like advertising their patriotism and no more that people would not forget. Do you even know what the USSR and the USA agreed on and what documents were signed during the Caribbean crisis and there’s no need to explain that a fairy tale about Turkish bases and guarantees about Cuba. If you are well versed in politics, you should know that each side can talk about victory, but in fact each side is inferior to each other on some points. I am more inclined to believe that if all the documents and treaties on the Caribbean crisis were publicized and there would be no such statements It was.
      1. +5
        10 November 2017 12: 32
        Yak can be long and hard, time will put everything in its place.
      2. +6
        11 November 2017 04: 41
        The turbidity in your head is complete. I explain on the fingers. The essence of the "agreement" with amers: do not spit out the window, for obvious reasons, we even had to put a bucket and it was filled. What is proposed: to climb a floor higher and already from there to spit on the arrogant striped Bosko. You ask, what to do with a bucket? I will answer: take it as a keepsake. hi
        1. 0
          11 November 2017 12: 55
          It’s in your head not your brains, but I’m sorry for cotton. You carefully look at the fact that Grenada, Salvador, Guatemala, Colombia and Peru did not get into the affairs of Central and South America after the Caribbean crisis of the USSR, but there were Marxist guerrillas there but they did not receive help from the USSR, although they could not get help from Afghanistan themselves. Now tell the KGB , GRU, MIDE that were fools.
          1. +6
            11 November 2017 16: 44
            Man, teach the life of your gunpowder, do not slip into cotton matters, the train has left, continue to jump towards the geyropa.
  12. 0
    10 November 2017 17: 33
    "The State Department was not surprised by the initiative of the Russian parliament to return the base to Cuba!"
    -Gaspadiya ... But who objects to inflict a well-deserved punishment on you!
  13. 0
    10 November 2017 18: 22
    To do this, we must agree with the Cuban government. But will it believe us again that in the event of US aggression we are ready to defend Cuba and the Cuban people after the actual betrayal on our part in the beginning of the 1990's, a big question. The Vietnamese, for example, refuse to believe, and the base in Vietnam is, as it were, useful now.
    1. 0
      11 November 2017 22: 49
      Do not go too far, until I say with whose help with the Cubans and Vietnamese, but, everything is much, even better than for us in Russia ...
  14. 0
    11 November 2017 22: 44
    And there are no more options for signing agreements and memoranda, except in extreme necessity, for which Kennedy paid, and Trump has yet to ...

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"