Why lost the White Project
Why did you lose the “White” project? The Russian code, the matrix expressed in the Russian civilization project, was in ever-growing contradiction with the projects of the Russian “elite” - the Romanovs and Westerners, who committed the February-March coup, and then with the support of the West created the White Project. The contradiction between the Russian matrix and the projects of Westerners and led to the 1917 disaster of the year, the new Troubles and the most brutal civil war. White project did not meet the aspirations of the masses.
The White Project is a liberal-bourgeois, pro-Western project. He was promoted by masons, secret hierarchically constructed lodges, aiming at the creation of a "united humanity" led by a world government. Accordingly, Russian lodges were secondary and conceptually ideologically dependent on Western senior "partners." At the same time, the Freemasons had a certain support of Jewry, which provided support from the so-called. "Financial international" ("golden elite", "owners of money"). In addition, the pro-Western, Masonic project of transforming Russia, especially at the first stage, enjoyed the support of Western "partners" in the Entente - official governments, institutions and organizations of the United States, Britain and France.
February revolutionaries who overthrew Tsar Nicholas II, who destroyed the Russian autocracy and the imperial army, were the social basis of this project. It was a large part of the then top of Russia, the degenerated elite of the Russian Empire - a significant part of the Romanov dynasty, speaking against Nicholas II, church hierarchs, generals, aristocracy, nobles, liberal intelligentsia (the overwhelming part of the then Russian intelligentsia), capitalists — bankers, industrialists, proprietors— bourgeois, officials, members of almost all public and political parties and movements (except for extremely weakened right-wing monarchists, who by the year 1917 had lost almost all previous positions in society).
Once and for all it is necessary to reject the myth that the Bolsheviks overthrew the king. The autocracy was crushed not by commissars and not Red Guards, but by freemasons of higher degrees of initiation, generals, dignitaries and Duma leaders. The liberal-bourgeois part of society tried to finally approve the matrix of Western society in Russia. The Russian autocracy, in their opinion, prevented them from being archaic, holding back the movement of Russia along the western path. They had power, wealth, capital, property, a huge influence through the liberal press (and then almost all of it was liberal), through parties and movements. But there was no real power, that is, control. Genuine power could only be obtained by destroying autocracy. In addition, the Russian Westernizers, brought up on European models, always have a distorted view of the West and Russia. Westerners, Mason liked to live in Europe - "sweet and civilized." For them, Russia has always been a “prison of nations”, a “dense, backward country”, with “wild and unenlightened people”, “always drunk”, incomprehensible to them muzhiks.
So they wanted to make France, Holland or England from Russia. They did not understand that Russia-Russia is a separate, unique civilization, not the West, and not the East. Our Westerners wanted “market”, “democracy” (in fact, the power of the rich through the media and parties), “freedom”. There were certain mercantile considerations - the royal family had to share property, the capitalists and bourgeois did not want any restrictions on the predatory mastering of Russian wealth, in this they did not differ from their Western counterparts.
Therefore, you should always remember that The White movement is a pro-Western liberal-democratic, bourgeois movement. In the Soviet Union, they made a mistake when in the films about the Civil War they created an erroneous image of white officers and men. Everywhere they turned out to be monarchists and during holidays in restaurants and taverns they shouted the hymn "God Save the Tsar!" This is a myth, Soviet and liberal. All the white armies and governments shunned monarchism, adhered to liberal-democratic positions. Moreover, the White Guard counterintelligence crushed marginal underground monarchist movements during the war with the Reds. Monarchism had no place in the ranks of the White Army, except for the personal convictions of individual officers. Not surprisingly, as it turned out later, most of the officers who held monarchical views and patriots of United Great Russia ended up in the ranks of the Red Army. And they were not mistaken; as a result, the Stalinist empire would restore the Russian empire almost to its former borders and even more - taking into account the states of “people's socialism” and the socialist bloc, which were included in the sphere of influence of Russia-USSR.
Why did the Westerners, the masons make a revolution, when the German bloc was already falling from exhaustion? After all, Russia could become the winner of Germany, along with other Entente powers. Such was the installation from the owners of the West - Russia, according to their plans, was to collapse and also become prey, like the dead German Empire. Russian Westerners-masons who were deceived in their hopes (future revolutionaries of the Februaryists) wanted to overthrow the tsar, come to power, and direct Russia along the Western path of development on the wave of victory, focusing on England, France and the USA. In addition, there was a danger that at the last moment the tsarist regime would nevertheless dodge and go to a separate peace from Germany (therefore they killed Rasputin, who with the help of the queen insisted on this idea), which could prolong the rule of the Romanovs for some time. As a result, Russia's pro-Western elite — industrial-financial, military, administrative, political — conspired and overthrew the tsar, destroying autocracy and empire.
However, instead of a triumphant victory, the degenerated “elite” caused a chain reaction and a catastrophe to the “old Russia” in which it itself flourished. Not only autocracy, the Russian Empire, the house of the Romanovs, but the whole old project and statehood collapsed. The Westernizers themselves launched the process of the Russian Troubles - merciless and all-destroying.
In this way, The white project was based on the conviction that after the overthrow of autocracy (or socialism, in 1991-1993), life can be arranged according to Western models. The project ideologists were masons who believed that Russia could be integrated into Western (European) civilization. Russia has already partially become the financial and economic periphery of the West under the Romanovs, European culture shaped the consciousness of the elite of the Russian Empire, which spoke German, French and English. The Russian intelligentsia was brought up on the western cultural matrix. Now, the Westerners wanted to complete the process of Westernization of the Russian civilization, begun under the Romanovs. If during the rule of the Romanovs, the social elite was mostly zapadnizirovatsya, and the people for the most part retained the Russian matrix (the dream of social justice, the Russian language, Russian fairy tales, epic songs, life, etc.), now in Russia they were going to create a new society by the example of Western democracies. Its hallmarks were parliamentary-type democracy; market, fully capitalistic economy, without the archaic elements that persist in Russia; independent judiciary; political pluralism, multi-party system; the secular nature of society, without the domination of one of the religions and state support of the church; various freedoms, etc.
But this is the outside. Under such a “democracy”, society was free from the outside, but, in fact, the parliamentary republic relied on a strict hierarchy of secret power in the order, masonic and paramason structures and closed clubs. Such a system still rules the West. The children of representatives of the financial, economic, political and military elite study in special educational institutions, enter into the local closed clubs (like "Skull and Bones" - the oldest secret society of students at Yale University in the USA). There they make the necessary contacts and acquaintances. There is a certain selection. Natives of such clubs and societies occupied and occupy the most important posts in politics, media, financial, economic, military, scientific and educational spheres in Western countries. Such a system is controlled by the executive, legislative and judicial branches. Individuals who dare to speak out against the system are being boycotted, isolated, ridiculed, or even physically destroyed if they do not understand the “signals” and are dangerous.
The market (capitalist) economy becomes the basis and breeding ground for the monopolistic structures of financial and industrial capital (modern TNCs and TNBs), which concentrates the main flows and sources of profit. The main wealth of the country belongs to a limited circle of families. Not surprisingly, at present, several hundred clan families control more than half of the wealth of the planet. Pluralism in ideology allows you to manipulate public opinion. Most and most mass media belong to the oligarchy, which is another contour of control over society.
It is worth noting that the Western project has shown its strength and effectiveness in the conditions of Western Europe and the USA. The masters of the West were the first to make a qualitative breakthrough in technology, and subjugated almost the entire planet to their power, robbed all of humanity. Colossal wealth was removed from the periphery of Western Europe, America, Africa, Asia, and island territories. They created an extremely effective parasitic model of plunder and exploitation of the most part of human civilization. This ultimately made it possible to create the appearance of prosperity in the core capitalist countries (metropolis), the consumer society and the “general welfare”, temporarily suppressing social discontent in Western countries, channeling it into consumption and entertainment. This channeled the attention and energy of the people, but had a disastrous effect on the future of the white race and practically all the peoples of Western Europe (extinction, moral, mental and physical degradation, involution). True, the owners of the West do not care about the future of the white race and the major nations of Europe, they have already implemented the project of the "gray race" - the ideal slave-consumer, who has no racial, linguistic, national, cultural roots. Such a slave is extremely easy to manipulate, sculpt anything from it.
The problem was that as it shows story, the western project of a global slave civilization, with the domination of the few "chosen" over the masses of "subhuman - two-legged tools", lowered into an animal state, is unacceptable for the Russian matrix, the program code of the Russian super-ethnos. The destruction of social justice and ethics of conscience (participation in the highest news, the world of truth and justice) leads to the self-destruction of the Russian people, society and the state. Thus, the westernization of the elite of the Russian Empire ultimately led to the 1917 disaster of the year. The Western path of development unambiguously leads to the Russian Distemper — the answer of the Russian people to the unrighteousness of the “elite” and the violation of social justice.
Therefore, representatives of the white, liberal-democratic project could not create an attractive image of the future for the majority of the people in 1917-1918. The image of “sweet” Holland or France, “enlightened”, prosperous and rich, was acceptable to the majority of a significant part of the liberal intelligentsia, the bourgeoisie and the nobility. But he had no chance of success in the common people. We see a similar situation in Russia at the end of the XX - XXI centuries. Goals like “catch up with Portugal” in terms of the level of prosperity, become “an energy superpower” (in essence, “the economy of the pipe”), are unacceptable for Russians. Ordinary people very quickly notice, despite the qualitative strengthening of the power of propaganda, that there are “chosen” and “working animals”. That someone can afford yachts and airplanes, diamonds and estates, real estate abroad, and for others “no money”. That “golden kids” can drive on super cars, break the rules and even kill ordinary people, they are “otmazhut”, and an ordinary person will be planted for a long time if he cuts down a dried up tree in order to heat the stove in winter.
Thus, it is precisely the path of integration of Russia with the West, the loss of its national identity to a large extent and predetermined the tragic divergence of civilization and national (state) projects in the Russian empire and, ultimately, the collapse and destruction of the Romanovs project, the “old Russia” - a catastrophe 1917 of the year. Russia could not become part of the West - only as a colony (and then in parts, it is easier to digest), with the complete extinction and death of the Russian super-ethnos, language and culture. The proposed future could not come (the unity of Russia and the West), since the path to it turned into a catastrophe and the death of Russian civilization and the people. Liberals and Westerners of all stripes in Russia could not understand this and cannot understand it. We are seeing a similar situation lately.
The white, liberal-democratic (pro-Western, Masonic) project had no chances in Russia at all. This project could not win, as Russia, following the path of complete Westernization, inevitably had to disintegrate and self-destruct. What happened in 1917-1920. Only the red (Soviet) project saved Russia, all civilization and the people.
Understand this and the deepest minds in the West. Thus, the British historian and philosopher Arnold Toynbee (1889 of the Year - 1975) noted: “Although the pro-Western policy was carried out for more than two centuries, it led Russia to Peter the Great to a complete collapse. One explanation for this development is that the process of Westernization did not affect all aspects of the life of Russia and was strictly limited to certain limits. Actually, the West has not influenced the life and culture of Russia ... Powerful traditional cultural layers resisted the processes of westernization (Russian matrix. - Author). Disaster 1914-18 made obvious and universally recognized industrial and social backwardness of Russia, contributed to the coming to power of the Bolsheviks, defining to some extent and their program ... The radical forms of political opposition developed in the West penetrated Russian life so deeply that the struggle for political freedom in Russia could well be considered Western-style movement, and the revolution was anti-Western in the sense that the West was in a certain sense identified with capitalism ”(A. Toynbee. Comprehension of history).
Toynbee clearly determined that the Russian code, the matrix expressed in the Russian civilization project, was in ever-growing contradiction with the projects of the Russian “elite” - the Romanovs and Westerners who committed the February-March coup, and then with the support of the West created the White Project. The contradiction between the Russian matrix and the projects of Westerners and led to the 1917 disaster of the year, the new Troubles and the most brutal civil war. The white project did not meet the aspirations of the masses who wanted social justice, the destruction of social parasitism. The white project led to the death of the Russian civilization and the people, to the disintegration and subordination of the remnants of Russia to the West. Therefore, the people supported the Bolsheviks, the Russian Communists, with their idea of social justice, conciliarism and the destruction of social parasites, with the replacement of the formal religion with the ethics of conscience.
Information