Where the terrorists will go now

15
Where the terrorists will go now


Joyful news from Syria overtaken actual events. "The Syrian army has cleared the last stronghold of the IG *". Strip it, and it's true last. But this should not be misleading - while there are terrorists, not only the IS, but also other branches of al-Qaeda. But this is not the main problem of the Middle East and the world in general.



Tens of thousands of terrorists were in Syria, thousands and hundreds were destroyed during operations in two neighboring states. Where did the rest go? Have you taken the right path and changed your views? Of course not. Bottom-line radicalism is designed not to go astray under any threats or circumstances. The greed of the upper is still not satisfied and will look for other deposits, routes and gold reserves.

There are three classic places for the new “series” of this epic drama: Afghanistan (and its environs), Yemen, which is under the siege of Saudi Arabia and Iraq, where the Kurdish problem is now acute.

Let's start with the last one. Iraq is under pressure from several sides: Iran and Turkey - neighbors and partners - do not want Baghdad to lose sight of all the movements and attempts of the Kurds to gain independence. It’s not easy to control the plans of terrorists who are in close proximity. Especially when the border with Syria under the control of the IG is still quite wide.

Yemen is a probable location for the IS, especially with the successful intervention of Riyadh there. But there are a lot of opponents, and it is more difficult to fight Hezbollah than with the Assad army, which was exhausted from civil uprisings.

By the way, Egypt and Israel also need to be kept in mind, but as deferred options for terrorists.

But Afghanistan has already established itself as a place for a very long war. And the attacks in Kabul IG are amazingly easy. And Afghanistan is a dream recruitment. A lot of unemployed youth from neighboring countries are waiting for work and will not even be asked for an ideological component.

There is one more reason to think about the future of Afghanistan:

"For Afghanistan this year, we requested 782,8 a million dollars to provide civilian assistance."

You should not make any hasty conclusions, but given the dispatch of additional troops and a total contingent of thousands of soldiers to 10, this long-suffering country, in which miraculously there are still civilians, needs to take a closer look.

Well, in Syria, as before, not only the rebels remain, the IG * also did not completely leave the land, but the “moderate” “green” groups are very much militants and are not planning to leave the country. Clearing a “stronghold” is good, but any information should be considered in the appropriate context.



* IG, al-Qaida, An-Nusra banned in the Russian Federation
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

15 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +2
    10 November 2017 15: 06
    Where will the terrorists go? Of course, from distant approaches they will move to their neighbors. It would be better if they stayed at the distant as long as possible. Another result of the completely unnecessary Syrian campaign ...
    1. 0
      10 November 2017 20: 37
      They will go where the owner who paid the money will send them.
      This is what the US coalition in Syria will do now. They also need to ..... away.
      1. 0
        10 November 2017 21: 22
        Quote: stas
        They will go where the owner who paid the money will send them.
        This is what the US coalition in Syria will do now. They also need to ..... away.

        Where...
        Israel is near
        1. 0
          10 November 2017 21: 36
          Quote: Alber
          Quote: stas
          They will go where the owner who paid the money will send them.
          This is what the US coalition in Syria will do now. They also need to ..... away.

          Where...
          Israel is near

          Hamas is enough for us
          1. 0
            11 November 2017 00: 03
            Quote: Krasnodar
            Hamas is enough for us

            So Hamas - enemies, and here - yours - treat as relatives.
  2. +16
    10 November 2017 15: 58
    Where the terrorists will go now

    It doesn’t work so that we don’t go anywhere? wink
    So many resources transferred
    I hope not a clean money laundering. Is there any good?
  3. +1
    10 November 2017 16: 50
    Where ? Where ?
    Where the mattresses say, they’ll go there.
    We will find out soon.
    1. +1
      10 November 2017 20: 49
      Quote: Alex20042004
      We will find out soon.

      Of course, we will find out when the FSB will prevent another terrorist attack and cover another "sleeping terrorist cell .." Then we will find out who went where and has already arrived ...
  4. +1
    10 November 2017 16: 59
    Opening the article, I thought that there would be a conversation in the “right political direction” about how the terrorists would move to Europe and begin to burn the liberals left and right.
    But the author pleased))
  5. +1
    10 November 2017 17: 20
    Probably Afghanistan’s turn. Not for nothing that they increase the military contingent and emit grandmothers. Babahs do black work, the Americans cover them, share information and support from the air. Fighting in Afghanistan itself probably makes no sense. There will be one ruin of traffic. But to do raids on the neighbors, the most that is necessary. Both the women and their neighbors will have hemorrhoids, and the UN will be at work. Well, all the right people and organizations will be involved and the United States will always be ** the main peacekeeper **!
  6. +3
    10 November 2017 18: 08
    They scored about Africa, the Philippines of Libya. The most important achievement in Syria is not the capture of a city but the restoration of dry-earth communication of Syria and Iraq. This will allow Iran to directly supply Syria.
  7. 0
    10 November 2017 23: 22
    Yemen, then what side? As a rule, the heyday of terrorism is observed where there are serious mineral reserves that for some reason fell into the zone of interests of the United States, which the authorities of the countries with these reserves are in no hurry to share with the Americans. Yemen is a poor country and the only interest in it is the ability to control the "neck" of the Red Sea and the Gulf of Aden, through which oil flows. To do this, it is enough to have a pro-American government in Yemen, against which the Hussites are cut. It makes no sense to collect all the curled bearded vermin there. even in the case of suppression of the movement of the Hussites, these bearded scouts will again be out of work. The intervention of Riyadh showed that the Hussites do a good job with the Saudis not only in Yemen, but also in the territory of the SA, so the Saudis are quietly thinking about how to bend their skis from the back, so that they quietly roll back to their destinies. As for Egypt and Israel, it’s completely past, due to the fact that both have serious enough forces to destroy the terrorists. It is one thing to identify and eliminate a cell, another thing is "not to notice a large armed formation." If you look for their interest in concentrating significant forces of radicals on your territory, then this is completely hopeless, because the question arises why and where to send them later? Saving for the sake of conservation is not an option, and it’s expensive. Afghanistan remains because and mineral reserves he has like a duhrak shag, on which koi is attacking China, which gives mattresses the opportunity to break off the Chinese economic expansion, poppy fields which are enough for the deep opium sleep of half the world's population, and the ability to use this bridgehead to unbalance a number of countries bordering on Russia with the possibility of transferring hostilities directly to its territory. So, from all of the above, the priority terrorist harbor is Afghanistan alone.
  8. +1
    11 November 2017 07: 37
    Perhaps the American "partners" plan to shave the beard barmels, give them blue helmets and send them as "peacekeepers" to the Donbass.
  9. 0
    11 November 2017 11: 36
    And why should they go somewhere, they are “fed” well here, it remains only after the example of Grandfather Nechipor from “Wedding in the Robin” to change “ensigns” in connection with the change of power!
  10. +2
    11 November 2017 13: 15
    .... ,, The Americans struck their main blow in early May. Moreover, their "southern front" very quickly managed to take control of several strategic points in the Syrian desert. It seemed like another push, and the goal will be achieved. The Russian response was elegant and deadly.
    The plan, the implementation of which the United States had been preparing for six months, collapsed ... because of the enemy's craziness.
    Meanwhile, the "tigers" of General Suheil were able to cut off the chickens all the way south in the vicinity of Tabka, and thereby completely buried the last American hope of taking control of important strategic areas on the right bank of the Euphrates ....
    US regular troops do not take part in the Syrian conflict. Funding, supplies, instructors, reconnaissance, minor attacks on selective points with missiles and the Air Force. It’s not worth it to jubilate and toss caps. Yes ISIS is retreating, but where is retreating? If in 1945 the Wehrmacht’s troops surrendered to the Americans, where did these militants retreat to the borders of the CIS? Something our rulers began to scurry around, run around the Asian republics, arrange warm friendly meetings, play hugs. What smells fried? Interest in the map published on the network, on which the lands of neighboring Russia, Uzbekistan and China were "attached" to Kazakhstan (many media outlets reprinted the map), shows that something is changing in relations between this former Soviet republic and the Russian Federation. It is noteworthy that articles on the need to switch the Kazakh language to the Latin alphabet illustrate unusually widening borders - experts assess this as a symbolic break with Russia. “It cannot be ruled out that the article by the president is a signal to both Moscow and the West. For Russia, this is a hint that it should be more compliant in matters relating to common economic interests. The uprising of the enemy of Russia, Khan Kenesary, in the middle of the XNUMXth century is described practically according to a Marxist training manual as a national liberation. “In honor of Kenesara, a monument was erected in Astana, and one of the streets bears his name”, owls, and for the West - a demonstration of loyalty and an independent position against the backdrop of worsening relations between Russia and the USA. ”Nazarbayev gave the go-ahead for the construction of the US naval base in the Caspian.
    .President of Kyrgyzstan Almazbek Atambayev signed a decree on renaming the October Revolution Day to the Day of History and Memory of the Ancestors. On November 7 and 8, the country will recall the events of 1916, when there was an uprising against the Russian Empire.
    Moldovan opposition politicians have repeatedly accused Dodon of conducting pro-Russian politics. In early October, the country's president promised President Putin not to pass anti-Russian laws. Dodon confirmed that the development of bilateral relations between Moscow and Chisinau continues “contrary to the provocations of the government and parliamentary majority” of Moldova, which is opposed to the president.
    After the Constitutional Court of Moldova made Dodon a de facto decorative president, and his signature no longer matters when approving ministers, judges and ambassadors, and is also not needed for laws to enter into force, Dodon announced the start of a campaign to hold early parliamentary elections and the country's transition to a presidential form of government.
    There is no point in recalling the policies of Ukraine and the Baltic republics regarding Russia. Why is the policy vector of the nearest neighboring republics more inclined towards the anti-Russian one? Without someone’s effort and someone’s work this cannot happen. Whose work is this? What is this all about? Ahead of the presidential elections in Russia and the World Cup. If Putin is re-elected for the next term, will we be allowed to hold such a significant event in the world as the World Cup.? Will they humiliate us once again? Such a significant event can only be prevented by large-scale military operations over a long border. To get caps and throw signs on TV telling what heroes we are? Why did he go to this ATEC Summit? To experience another rudeness from the side? Allowed to meet with trump on the run ...? What a humiliation! This is a ridiculous joint statement on Syria ... What can be good for us at these summits if we are in a humiliating blockade, in a general conspiracy against us? China, we’ve greased it, with contracts and will now squeeze us. We can get to the football championship and hold it. They will not make it so that everyone will not be up to the championship.? Well, Trump pats Putin on the shoulder - well done, a brave guy, but the Americans have not yet set a serious test for us .....

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"