Military Review

Why did Vladimir Putin give money to the "Matilda"

111



Frankly, after all the hype that was raised around the film, and the first reviews did not want to go. But by the twentieth minute of the movie I wasn’t able to pull me out of the cinema. I understood why the Russian authorities became “accomplices” of this picture, and only wanted to find out how well they invested their money.

First a few words about the movie itself.

The film "Matilda" is the same historical, as well as the film "Crimea", which was released a month earlier. We will definitely return to Crimea, but for now let’s figure out why the Kremlin needed a film like Matilda.

To understand whyneed to find out about what This movie. Against the background of the pre-premiere hysteria, I was expecting a sinful affair to run into an anti-Orthodox ribbon. And the first discovery of the film for me was that there is nothing anti-Orthodox in it (for those who do not consider Nicholas II to be holy). No, from the word at all.



But the royal family (all without exception) is shown from the most unsightly side. Moreover, this was emphasized by the mass of details and frankly fictional and marasmic plot lines. And here, in my opinion, frank bust was allowed. You can not too clearly inspire the viewer the main idea. You can run into the opposite effect (which eventually turned out).

Nicholas II is represented by a man, not only unable to govern the country, but also clearly unworthy of this high honor. Moreover, even his father, Emperor Alexander III, is shown from far from the best side.



The film does not have the adamant and unshakable Russian patriot tsar, as he was according to the official version. There is an ordinary sovereign, with his weaknesses and cockroaches in his head.

If you don’t know the official story or listen to it half-heartedly at school, then after watching Matilda, the question arises involuntarily: “And what should we be proud of with all these characters?”

No, of course, should not. This is the main message of the film. And it should be absorbed by those who will uncritically watch the tape.

So, the film was originally conceived and filmed as a purely anti-monarchist film. Having dealt with this, let's try to answer the main question: why does Vladimir Putin need this?

Which way to move Russia

In fact, in Russia very soon the most important question for her may arise. about the continuity of power. Who will lead the country after Vladimir Putin retires? And here the names of the new leader are not even important. And the course that he will lead the country is important.

And there are exactly four ways.

1. Modernized Soviet.
2. Liberal.
3. National Patriotic.
4. Monarchical-patriotic.


Modernized soviet. This is the way that Vladimir Putin leads Russia today. In some ways, it resembles Chinese, but with its own Russian specifics. And in order to clear the way for his successor, he must crush all his opponents with the greatest possible force.

Liberal. This “direction” is very bad today. Liberals completely discredited themselves in 1990, and now they have fallen into complete insanity. Old cadres are leaving, and new ones are still going to political nurseries. At the same time, the Kremlin openly rolls the liberal movement into asphalt, and today we can say with certainty that Russian liberals are not dangerous.

National patriotic. Everything is simple here: “Russia for Russians”, etc. This way is Russian Biletsky and Yarosh. By themselves, they are not particularly strong, but their bond with monarchist patriots can be dangerous for the authorities. Not today, of course, but when Russia takes the path of changing the leader.

Monarchic-patriotic. Very strong group in Russia, which has a lot of both overt and covert supporters. Her strength lies in a very flexible ideology. Over the past 25 years, she found a common language with all other trends. They can calmly join forces with anyone and at the same time will not lose their “identity” and strength. Already today, monarchists have dozens of only open supporters in the Duma. And most importantly, its position in the army, the diplomatic corps and the power structures of Russia is extremely strong. So, they are dangerous.

Today it is perhaps the only real competitor of the current government. Yes, while there is Putin, they have no chance, but then ...

It is in the last two groups (first of all the last) that the film Matilda beats. Had the director and the writers be tantalizing, they would have been able to create not a shabby ridiculous film, but a really cool anti-campaign against monarchists. In the same way as the film "Crimea", which has become a truly powerful weapons against the “national patriots” (the author wrote about it in detail a month ago):



The film "Crimea", or Back to the Future of Ukraine

Moreover, “Crimea” can be cited as an example of a successful “investment” of the authorities. The state money invested in it was repulsed in full. And with “Matilda” everything turned out, to put it mildly, not very.

That is why I agree with those who believe that state funds from the Russian budget in this case were thrown to the wind. But, as you understand, my motives are somewhat different and differ from the critics of the film from the “patriotic” camp.
Author:
111 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Mar.Tirah
    Mar.Tirah 9 November 2017 15: 12 New
    54
    What a modernized Soviet way ????????????? Surround! Soviet doesn’t even smell here .. Remember Putin’s words. Who regrets the USSR doesn’t have a head! A large technocratic bourgeois oligarchy in Russia cannot build a Soviet the state. Genetically cannot. The film is artistic, and that’s it. I won’t even look at this nonsense.
    1. Vend
      Vend 9 November 2017 15: 21 New
      20
      Why did Vladimir Putin give money to the "Matilda"
      Well, why write nonsense. What did he give the order?
      1. VadimSt
        VadimSt 9 November 2017 15: 44 New
        +3
        And he does! It is surprising otherwise ... why give a "word" to those who are clearly making a split in Russian society, and even denigrates the role of the Russian leader!
        1. Nicholas C.
          Nicholas C. 9 November 2017 16: 09 New
          37
          Another drop dead story in the genre of HPP. I guess once - the author is from Ukraine. Putin -God, Putin is all by himself. He even reads film scripts to give money personally. But after all, a hitch, Teacher presented the script of one author for financing, and he shot the film according to the script of another and about another.
          Quote: Author: Yuri Podolyaka (Yurasumy)
          the first discovery of the film for me was that there is nothing anti-Orthodox in it
          Wow, many Orthodox hierarchs, even the Patriarch, spoke out, that is. And here it is. Powerful expert. I am proud to read.
          Money for cinema in Russia is allocated by the Board of Trustees of the Cinema Fund. Agrees Medinsky. Also a friend from Ukraine. The question can be posed in a generalized way: why in Russia for state budget money (even if for Surgutneftegas money), low-grade rubbish, or even outright Russophobia and anti-Orthodox Satanism (Matilda, Viking, etc.), is removed mainly for Western tracing papers. Does this reflect the aesthetic level of members of the Popsovet and Medinsky, or is it someone else's attitude?
          1. zoolu350
            zoolu350 9 November 2017 19: 20 New
            14
            Yes, there is nothing anti-Orthodox in Matilda, the main plot of the film is the 3 bitch conflict. The film is a typical buncrust crotch. The plot is poor enough. Nyasha in collusion with Teacher is unambiguous.
            1. 97110
              97110 11 November 2017 12: 49 New
              +2
              Quote: zoolu350
              Nyasha in collusion with Master
              drank the money laid down in the budget for a decent locomotive and a ferry.
            2. Captain45
              Captain45 14 November 2017 11: 02 New
              0
              Quote: zoolu350
              Yes, there is nothing anti-Orthodox in Matilda, the main plot of the film is the 3 bitch conflict. The film is a typical buncrust crotch. The plot is poor enough. Nyasha in collusion with Teacher is unambiguous.

              Bravo!! good Probably the only adequate comment in the entire controversy about the “Matilda.” Before that they got it with this “Matilda” was not too lazy, went down, looked. Namely, that the conflict of the three bitch and + still a mad lieutenant, in the style of Edmond Dantes.
          2. kig
            kig 10 November 2017 02: 23 New
            +2
            You seem to understand Orthodoxy. Please tell me, where and in what can I find "anti"? In my opinion, there is nothing at all, no idea. It is not even clear whether Matilda Nicholas loved or simply fought for a place in the sun.
            1. The comment was deleted.
          3. Olgovich
            Olgovich 10 November 2017 09: 18 New
            +1
            Quote: Nikolai S.
            why in Russia, for state budget money (even if Surgutneftegaz money) is removed, mainly on Western tracing paper, bad rubbish, or even outright Russophobia and anti-Orthodox Satanism (Matilda, Viking, etc.)

            It is precisely because Putin’s hands do not reach this point, to follow this up as well.
            And it is his fault that he failed to put the right people in this direction.
            1. CONTROL
              CONTROL 10 November 2017 12: 35 New
              +4
              Quote: Olgovich
              Quote: Nikolai S.
              why in Russia, for state budget money (even if Surgutneftegaz money) is removed, mainly on Western tracing paper, bad rubbish, or even outright Russophobia and anti-Orthodox Satanism (Matilda, Viking, etc.)

              It is precisely because Putin’s hands do not reach this point, to follow this up as well.
              And it is his fault that he failed to put the right people in this direction.

              For the 17th year - Nicholas II is to blame ... for the 37th - Stalin ... there is no Beria ... or who is it? Khrushchev? for the 41st - Stalin ... no, again Beria ... for the 90s - Gorbachev ... for the 2000s - Yeltsin ... no, Gaidar with Chubais! And for 2018th .... Medinsky? ... yeah, Medvedev !!! Caught the robber!
              ... that’s why Putin holds it at the premieres: there aren’t enough hands for “everything by yourself,” and there’s someone “to answer for the bazaar” ... The lightning rod is in anticipation of future shocks !?
              --------------------------------
              Lenin said until 1917: "A revolution in Russia is completely impossible ... there is no revolutionary situation ... an agrarian country ... the peasantry will not support ... I will not go to Russia from Geneva / Berlin / Berne / ... !!! "
              ... and what happened? He arrived - because the “revolution in Russia” could have happened without him!
          4. CONTROL
            CONTROL 10 November 2017 12: 21 New
            +3
            Quote: Nikolay S.
            The question can be posed in a generalized way: why in Russia for state budget money (even if for Surgutneftegas money), low-grade rubbish, or even outright Russophobia and anti-Orthodox Satanism (Matilda, Viking, etc.), is removed mainly for Western tracing papers. Does this reflect the aesthetic level of members of the Popsovet and Medinsky, or is it someone else's attitude?

            No need to ask right questions !!!
            ... you can right answers receive!
            Especially since everyone knows these answers ...
        2. Elena Zakharova
          Elena Zakharova 9 November 2017 18: 19 New
          15
          Quote: VadimSt
          It is surprising otherwise ... why give a "word" to those who are clearly making a split in Russian society, and even denigrates the role of the Russian leader!

          Your words can be fully attributed to the authors of the article.
          In my opinion, the analyst from him is from Ksenia Sobchak a ballerina.
        3. Nikolai Grek
          Nikolai Grek 9 November 2017 18: 23 New
          +2
          Quote: VadimSt
          It is surprising otherwise ... why give a "word" to those who clearly bring about a split in Russian society

          to fix the hatred of the Russian population towards them !!! good good good
        4. Yurasumy
          9 November 2017 19: 54 New
          +1
          What is the split? and where is the blackening? The author tries to explain the essence of what is happening.
      2. 210ox
        210ox 9 November 2017 15: 45 New
        +3
        I do not associate this film with the current government. But with the current immorality, permissiveness. The absence of ideology is clearly connected ..quote = Wend] [quote] Why Vladimir Putin gave money for "Matilda" [/ quote] Well, why write nonsense. What did he give the order? [/ Quote]
        1. Yurasumy
          9 November 2017 19: 55 New
          +1
          Well, then nothing can be denied.
      3. Smog
        Smog 9 November 2017 15: 46 New
        +2
        Quote: Wend
        What did he give the order?

        And fluorine believes that he has salted his personal .... Oh, yes .... the paper will endure everything ....
        1. AA17
          AA17 9 November 2017 16: 26 New
          +8
          I guess. The author just wanted to voice his thoughts on the 4 ways of Russia's development. For a marketing move, in order to draw attention to his "product", I pasted a LABEL from brand words by Matilda and Putin. It didn’t work out very well. The wrapper is beautiful, and the product is so-so. The topics of the "paths of the MOVEMENT of Russia" are not disclosed - what material resources are needed to implement this or that path, how much finance will be needed, what staff to rely on, how long it can take, etc. Weakly attracted to analytics. It does not pull at all. Today at lunch there was an opportunity to listen to Khazin’s thoughts: "About how everything works." This is analytics.
          1. Yurasumy
            9 November 2017 19: 57 New
            +1
            In fact, the author himself received his sight by going to the film. He matured from how beautifully the “patriots” were forced to work against themselves. Just a master class. And of course, with the theme of Orthodoxy, the "patriots" framed themselves. They would first find out about the plot, etc., and not write nonsense. They were used beautifully in the dark.
          2. CONTROL
            CONTROL 10 November 2017 12: 39 New
            +2
            Quote: AA17
            Today at lunch there was an opportunity to listen to Khazin’s thoughts: "About how everything works." This is analytics.

            ... you can listen to Felix Razumovsky; this is history...
    2. Elena Zakharova
      Elena Zakharova 9 November 2017 18: 21 New
      11
      Quote: Mar. Tira
      The film is an art, and that’s it. I won’t even watch this nonsense.

      The film is primarily false.
      1. Yurasumy
        9 November 2017 19: 53 New
        +3
        Of course. Like 90% of historical films. Where more lies, where less. In this case, more.
      2. Krabik
        Krabik 9 November 2017 23: 14 New
        +4
        Lying of course.

        Only here, Nikolai’s joke was greatly ennobled there.

        And reality is noticeably worse than a feature film.

        What was this Nicholas can be compared with the golden boys of our ruling elite, driving in the Galenvagenah in Moscow.

        Yes, and the actions of Nicholas during the coronation speak for themselves, staged a massacre in the garden and held balls during the removal of corpses.

        It is not in vain that people call him the bloody Nicholas, although pastor Cyril appointed him saints ...
        1. Monster_Fat
          Monster_Fat 10 November 2017 06: 11 New
          +1
          Pastor Cyril and appointed him saints.

          Ha, by the way, about the head of the Orthodox Church .... does it seem to me alone that both last Orthodox Patriarchs are from the same Estonian monastery?
          1. Krabik
            Krabik 10 November 2017 18: 36 New
            0
            You know, I don’t even want to think.

            If it were my will, I would hang everyone on the pillars ...
    3. Yurasumy
      9 November 2017 19: 51 New
      +2
      Drop the emotions. They are useless here. And just ask din a simple question. What is Russia’s “heroic" now? Who is set as an example?
      1. Reklastik
        Reklastik 9 November 2017 20: 26 New
        +1
        "28 Panfilov" film is ...
        1. RUSS
          RUSS 13 November 2017 20: 29 New
          0
          Quote: Reklastik
          "28 Panfilov" film is ...

          Fiction.
    4. War_Child_83
      War_Child_83 9 November 2017 21: 59 New
      +3
      “He who does not regret the collapse of the USSR has no heart. But he who wants to restore it in its former form has no head” ©
      Quote for sure. "Restore as it was" impossible, but in the updated one - it’s quite discussed.
    5. gm9019
      gm9019 10 November 2017 01: 10 New
      +5
      Quote: Mar. Tira
      Soviet here does not even smell ..

      absolutely right! Soviet - from “all power to the Soviets!”, Chosen by the people to representatives of the most diverse sections of the population, and here we have a look at the Duma, is that the people? Yes, they are infinitely far from the people! We have a bourgeois-democratic system.
    6. CONTROL
      CONTROL 10 November 2017 12: 18 New
      +2
      Quote: Mar. Tira
      The film is an art, and that’s it.

      ... rather - anti-art
  2. Dzmicer
    Dzmicer 9 November 2017 15: 18 New
    12
    National patriotic
    Monarchic-patriotic
    It is in the last two groups (first of all, the last one) that the film “Matilda” beats

    That is, in Russian.
    And what else should you expect from (((Jewish director))) Teacher? I can’t produce anything other than anti-Russian agitation for his brothers in the workshop, moreover, the agitation is of poor quality, since the best sons (((God’s chosen people))) left Russia long ago, having moved to the USA and Israel. That “Matilda”, that “Viking”, that any other “creation” of people with beautiful faces and the right genes, who were given the actual “Russian” culture to their mercy - all the Russophobic internacist slag about Russian subhumans and their insignificant rulers is all the same.
    1. fider
      fider 9 November 2017 18: 00 New
      +4
      Dzmicer
      * ".. the best sons (((of God's chosen people))) have long left Russia, moving to the United States and Israel."
      Exactly so. You have only baptized ones left. Tolerate, "gentlemen!"
  3. parusnik
    parusnik 9 November 2017 15: 22 New
    15
    The author is digging something deeply ... now what movie - a “masterpiece” - don’t take it that was made with budgetary money .. definitely money down the drain ... We all want to catch up and overtake Hollywood and Bollywood together .. but it’s something between Bollywood and Hollywood films ... although ... to the directors ... I think the need has ripened for new Russian masterpieces to insert Bollywood stamps ... The main villain, takes aim at no less than the main character ... no matter what, depending on the plot, not less than the main the hero says ...: while you aim at me, I will sing my last "song" .. It seems that it seemed to revive the picture ...
  4. Alsur
    Alsur 9 November 2017 15: 23 New
    11
    Sometimes the opinion of people about the omnipotence of someone is surprising. By power, the character - "Putin", is close to God. Why this is done, sincere faith, secret thoughts - I do not know. But to think that power, absolutely every phenomenon of life got into every hole, it is predetermined, seems to me a significant exaggeration. This is more like a phenomenon arising from the decisions of some officials (successful or unsuccessful), which may be due to personal, corruption, and various other relationships. For example, to the official who determines the allocation of state. money for art, through his relatives or through an old friendship, there is a way out of people planning to make a motion picture. And that decision is being pushed. Something like this. But for someone to control everything, from Syria, Ukraine, to the cinema, I don’t believe it. Otherwise, it is a religion.
    1. andrej-shironov
      andrej-shironov 10 November 2017 11: 42 New
      0
      So we say that it’s time to get rid of idols! If the government cannot build such a management system where most of the excesses that are happening in Russia cannot occur, then such a government is not needed!
  5. mavrus
    mavrus 9 November 2017 15: 29 New
    22
    It’s strange to read that Putin is leading the country in a “modernized Soviet” way ...
    Yes, and the other three “development paths” look, somehow very far-fetched. But the author, like a real artist, sees the world in his own way ...
    It is strange when no one (from those walking along the modernized Soviet route) gets shit about our Soviet past ... An exception, almost the only one, when Menshov refused to award the prize to the “Bastards”. So how much slop was poured on him after this, and how dare he, it’s a "work of art" ... And then Nikolashka was "offended" !!! So the stink does not rest ... How dare, he is a saint. And you need to shoot about him only that he is the most skillful and most worthy leader ... It’s not funny for himself to sculpt an icon from Nikolai.
  6. Alex_59
    Alex_59 9 November 2017 15: 38 New
    26
    Modernized soviet. This is the path that Vladimir Putin leads Russia today.
    Leads in the team Gref, Kudrin, Medvedev, Chubais and a number of Gaidar specialists.
    In some ways, it resembles Chinese, but with its own Russian characteristics.
    I don’t know how to comment on this. I don’t know at all. Specificity ... well, yes, there is specificity. In our country, under the leadership of the EDR, industry has been building a corvette in 10 years, in the PRC, under the leadership of the Communist Party, two or three corvettes are being built a year, and every year they give up a destroyer. Very specific specifics. Highly.
    1. Svetlana
      Svetlana 9 November 2017 16: 08 New
      +3
      Quote: Alex_59
      Leads in the team Gref, Kudrin, Medvedev, Chubais and a number of Gaidar specialists.
      In some ways, it resembles Chinese, but with its own Russian characteristics.
      I don’t know how to comment on this. I don’t know at all.

      Quote: Alex_59
      Very specific specifics. Highly.
      So they commented. You can’t say more precisely.
  7. andrej-shironov
    andrej-shironov 9 November 2017 16: 06 New
    17
    Strange, if not more, the author has a vision of the current situation in Russia. Is Putin leading Russia along a modernized Soviet path? Facts! At least five unkillable facts. But the fact that Putin leads Russia on a liberal path into the abyss, there are facts! I understand hysteria before the election, but you need to think and analyze it with your head! Where is the praised critical thinking? Although the power fellows, so you have to be able to trash people's brains!
    1. Yurasumy
      9 November 2017 20: 03 New
      +4
      1. Who is the basis of the "heroics" of Russia?

      2. I live in a town where a child can attend approximately 15 sports sections for free. Town 10 thousand of us. It is also an excellent hospital where they treat very well and free of charge.

      3. The author turned to the ENT Institute in St. Petersburg and found out that Russian citizens can get a very large list of services for free and without problems. The cost of which for foreigners is from a million or more. And the lines are small.

      4. Anthem of Russia, when was the last time you listened? Doesn’t resemble anything?

      5. Have you been to Red Square? Have you seen the mausoleum? Who is there? But there was an idea in 90's to remove the body and put it to the ground.

      In fact, the facts are still a wagon. In economics, etc. But I think there you just won’t understand me. I chose it easier for you.
      1. free
        free 9 November 2017 20: 33 New
        +2
        Quote: yurasumy
        1. Who is the basis of the "heroics" of Russia?

        2. I live in a town where a child can attend approximately 15 sports sections for free. Town 10 thousand of us. It is also an excellent hospital where they treat very well and free of charge.

        3. The author turned to the ENT Institute in St. Petersburg and found out that Russian citizens can get a very large list of services for free and without problems. The cost of which for foreigners is from a million or more. And the lines are small.

        4. Anthem of Russia, when was the last time you listened? Doesn’t resemble anything?

        5. Have you been to Red Square? Have you seen the mausoleum? Who is there? But there was an idea in 90's to remove the body and put it to the ground.

        In fact, the facts are still a wagon. In economics, etc. But I think there you just won’t understand me. I chose it easier for you.

        Your city?
      2. Reklastik
        Reklastik 9 November 2017 20: 35 New
        11
        Man, this is not an indicator at all - the "town" where you live. Find out how they live in other towns comparable in population to yours. The town of Pervomaisk, Nizhny Novgorod region, for example. Announce the list of services at the ENT Institute. I also have experience applying to the government for medical surgical services for a 2-year-old child. Not for free. Expensive. But what can’t you do for your own sake? Of course they won’t understand you. Muder hurts) The anthem of Russia listened and are listening. Reminds. But only in form. Especially when it comes to God))) But the Mausoleum does not bother people. They are busy with another.
        1. Golovan Jack
          Golovan Jack 9 November 2017 20: 51 New
          10
          Quote: Reklastik
          Man, this is not an indicator at all - the "town" where you live

          Appeal to "you" here is considered rudeness, in the know?
          The town is quite an indicator for itself, the person expressed his opinion, and, in general, I join this opinion.
          Quote: Reklastik
          The town of Pervomaisk, Nizhny Novgorod region, for example

          And what is wrong there? Only more specific.
          Quote: Reklastik
          I also have experience applying to the government for medical surgical services for a 2-year-old child. Not for free. Expensive...

          ... out of turn, right? I’ll console you - in a Union without blat, you wouldn’t crawl past the line for money. And the queue was under the Union, oddly enough.

          Other uninteresting.
          1. the lord
            the lord 9 November 2017 23: 59 New
            +5
            But I do not know such a rule that they consider "you" to be rudeness-do not overthink. Yurasumi commented, dragging the facts by the ears and very much. What is wrong in Pervomaisk-Reklastic also specifically voiced, and there everyone understands what is far from a masquabad. And in the USSR, without cronyism, it was easily and specifically cured, but the fact that you didn’t manage to do this (see diseases were especially serious))))
            1. Golovan Jack
              Golovan Jack 10 November 2017 07: 38 New
              +9
              Quote: znavel
              But I don’t know such a rule that they count on “you” as rudeness

              Ignorance does not relieve responsibility, in cources?
              You don’t know much yet. This is not my sadness, this is your sadness (s).
              Quote: znavel
              in the USSR, without cronyism, it was easily and specifically cured, but the fact that you didn’t manage to do this (see the diseases) was especially serious

              Relative thyroid cancer in a relative, was it enough under the Union? The process was quite nervous and costly, now I would have decided it all much easier.
              Quote: znavel
              Yurasumi commented, pulling the facts by the ears ... Reklastik also voiced specifically and everyone understands it ...

              Well, what can I say ... The arbiter of you, as from a (censorship, noun) bullet, I'm sorry.
              1. the lord
                the lord 11 November 2017 03: 33 New
                +2
                Ignorance of nonexistent does not lead to any responsibility, but try if you can)))))
                And how would you solve thyroid cancer right now? A bullet in the head, so as not to suffer? And so - yes, all oncology is a terrible and very nervous lottery - no one is insured and the final result is unpredictable - it happens, that lets go ...
                The abyrr of me is the highest level of professionalism — Yurasumi clings to external signs, without giving in to the nature of things. And he does not like the anthem and in the mausoleum he sees a monument, not a tomb (who gave this senile generally the right to move one of the greatest people in the history of Russia at his own covetous discretion) Let him get away with it, in front of society, in order to have the right to vote on such topics . And then let him begin with the relics of the Orthodox, so that in order and honor it was)))))).
                You can look in this the injustice of my judgments as an arbitrator)))))
                1. Vasya Vassin
                  Vasya Vassin 11 November 2017 12: 14 New
                  +1
                  Indeed, his comment surprised me. With such a diagnosis, even urinothirapy would help, provided that the diagnosis is incorrect.
      3. andrej-shironov
        andrej-shironov 10 November 2017 11: 30 New
        +2
        1 I live in a city where part of the clinics have already been closed and maternity hospitals are closing, but the perinatal center has not yet been put into operation. During Putin’s reign, 1999-2017, five city-forming enterprises, where about 5 tons of people worked, were closed off, which is 20% of the population of my city! We have not discovered any new ones with the same employment! You probably have a town either military or closed, and I'm happy for you! It’s unrealistic to find a free section here!
        2. The argument about the anthem is finally something! You would also write about the houses that were built during the Soviet Union and bring this argument in favor. If the hymn of Russia is important to you, listen to your health, you can also listen to alterations by other authors such as Minaev to foreign songs.
        3. The author applied and found out, but I probably didn’t have to use the services of supposedly free medicine! And I used it! Believe me, the action was still one!
        4. Putin and the liberals will not be able to remove the mausoleum, because this will cause a final split among the people. But they could spoil the opening of the Yeltsin Center.
        In fact, even more facts! And in economics and politics! But you also don’t understand me.
        Everything is fine with you and I am happy for you! But be able to see beyond your own hut! So people turn into smug bourgeoisie! Above them it’s not a caplet, and it seems like everywhere else!
      4. CONTROL
        CONTROL 10 November 2017 12: 48 New
        +2
        Quote: yurasumy
        1. Who is the basis of the "heroics" of Russia?

        2. I live in a town where a child can attend about 15 sports sections for free. The town of 10 thousand of us ......
        ..... Actually the facts are still a wagon. In economics, etc. But I think there you just won’t understand me. I chose it easier for you.

        I live in the same town! Because +!
  8. Svetlana
    Svetlana 9 November 2017 16: 15 New
    12
    Modernized Soviet - how is it? One figure has already tried to upgrade. It was modernized before returning to February 1917 of the year with all that it implies. Only October did not happen. So in February we live.
    1. Karabin
      Karabin 9 November 2017 19: 54 New
      +6
      Quote: Svetlana
      So in February we live.

      Yes sir. With capitalist ministers and with NewKerensky at the helm.
    2. Yurasumy
      9 November 2017 20: 05 New
      +2
      Do you know a country like China?
  9. Andrei from Chelyabinsk
    Andrei from Chelyabinsk 9 November 2017 16: 15 New
    14
    Modernized soviet. This is the path that Vladimir Putin leads Russia today. In some ways, it resembles Chinese, but with its own Russian characteristics. And in order to clear the way for his successor, he must crush as many opponents as possible.

    ????? Dear author, Putin leads Russia 100% in a liberal way
    At the same time, the Kremlin openly pushes the liberal movement into the asphalt, and today it is safe to say that Russia's liberals are not dangerous.

    The Kremlin doesn’t roll anything anywhere, it’s enough to see who heads the country's leading institutions (for example, Sberbank). Neither in domestic politics nor in the economy is there anything remotely resembling Soviet at present
    1. Yurasumy
      9 November 2017 20: 06 New
      +2
      The answer is above. Your colleague asked a similar question and demanded evidence that was provided to him.
      1. Andrei from Chelyabinsk
        Andrei from Chelyabinsk 10 November 2017 07: 17 New
        +5
        The answer is not accepted due to the complete lack of communication with the question. In addition, he is mistaken.
        As for medicine, I am happy for your locality, which you were too shy to name, but, as a person who managed to live in St. Petersburg, Khanty-Mansiysk,
        Ulan-Ude, Nizhnevartovsk, apart from my native Chelyabinsk, I affirm that the situation in the country is half as good as you describe. Sport ... for all the time I only once encountered the free section. Moreover, it should be understood that under Putin, both medicine and sport are more and more commercialized, that is, they are moving away from the Soviet one.
  10. Vasya Vassin
    Vasya Vassin 9 November 2017 16: 26 New
    0
    Thanks for the interesting review, I’ll try to see this for sure, I hope at least there will be good ballet scenes in the big theater.
    1. Freeman
      Freeman 9 November 2017 17: 48 New
      +3
      Quote: Vasya Vassin
      Thanks for the interesting review, I’ll definitely try to see this I hope at least there will be good ballet scenes in the Bolshoi Theater.

      Enjoy
      1. the lord
        the lord 10 November 2017 00: 04 New
        0
        Oh, but were you embarrassed by the scene with the breasts appearing? I remember the Amer film about the 30s, “Cotton Club.” There, one was also indignant at the nudity in the paintings- “Who can like this?” The answer was- “Not ...
        1. Freeman
          Freeman 10 November 2017 07: 46 New
          +1
          Quote: znavel
          Oh, but were you embarrassed by the scene with the breasts appearing?

          No, it doesn’t bother. I posted this screenshot so that the comrade would definitely go to the film and enjoy the ballet.
          - Yesterday, I went to Swan Lake with my wife. For me, ballet is a celebration. - And for me - a funeral. - I do not understand ... - Brezhnev ... Andropov ... Chernenko ...

          The second option is closer to me. laughing
      2. Taoist
        Taoist 10 November 2017 10: 08 New
        +2
        What is there to enjoy ... boobs sucks ... bully
        1. CONTROL
          CONTROL 10 November 2017 12: 56 New
          +2
          Quote: Taoist
          What is there to enjoy ... boobs sucks ... bully

          ... but they are !!!
          And this is already big +! fellow
        2. the lord
          the lord 11 November 2017 03: 37 New
          +1
          Great boobs! And with age to the waist they don’t sag. You need to understand ....
    2. CONTROL
      CONTROL 10 November 2017 13: 03 New
      +1
      Quote: Vasya Vassin
      Thanks for the interesting review, I’ll try to see this for sure, I hope at least there will be good ballet scenes in the big theater.

      - Do you have waffles? What is the name of?
      - Snowflake!
      - Fresh?
      - (grimace of the seller ... no!)
      - And what about the cookies?
      - Fuck, berry is better than a waffle!
      "film" Thieves in Law "
    3. Elena Zakharova
      Elena Zakharova 10 November 2017 22: 37 New
      +3
      Quote: Vasya Vassin
      Thanks for the interesting review,

      Oh Vasya Vasin .....
  11. Gardamir
    Gardamir 9 November 2017 16: 52 New
    20
    The author is a solid minus for
    Modernized soviet. This is the way that Vladimir Putin leads Russia today.
    Do you know that the Duma is going to pass a law on the eviction of debtors from apartments? I think it is not worth reminding about raising retirement? Putin himself recently said about the co-financing of medicine, which in translation from official means paid medicine.
    Putin himself hates everything Soviet and does not want to hide it. Therefore, attributing to Putin a craving for socialism is at least ridiculous. So Putin is a supporter of liberal capitalism with a slight bias towards patriotism.
    1. The comment was deleted.
  12. unignm
    unignm 9 November 2017 16: 55 New
    +5
    however, without 100g you can’t make out. Did you come up with it yourself?
  13. Taoist
    Taoist 9 November 2017 17: 11 New
    11
    My wife went away, came back ... neighing like horses ... For a de facto costume tale in which for some reason the heroes bear the names of real historical figures ... Hollywood is resting. So I'm afraid that the author thinks too well .... A banal "commercial movie" with the promotion of scandal. There would be no scandal, so there would be nothing to watch at all ...
    1. Yurasumy
      9 November 2017 19: 21 New
      0
      And why are they going to twist it on the "first"?
      1. BecmepH
        BecmepH 10 November 2017 09: 39 New
        +1
        Quote: yurasumy
        And why are they going to twist it on the "first"?

        And what, "first" is an indicator? They show what is ordered ...
    2. Yurasumy
      9 November 2017 20: 06 New
      +1
      I also laughed for the first 20 minutes. This is a normal reaction to this "movie."
  14. Alsur
    Alsur 9 November 2017 17: 12 New
    +6
    Quote: Vasya Vassin
    Thanks for the interesting review, I’ll try to see this for sure, I hope at least there will be good ballet scenes in the big theater.

    Listen, Vasya, just go to the ballet.
    1. Svetlana
      Svetlana 10 November 2017 10: 50 New
      0
      Quote: ALSur
      Quote: Vasya Vassin
      Thanks for the interesting review, I’ll try to see this for sure, I hope at least there will be good ballet scenes in the big theater.

      Listen, Vasya, just go to the ballet.

      wassat
  15. Großer feldherr
    Großer feldherr 9 November 2017 17: 17 New
    +9
    Moreover, “Crimea” can be cited as an example of a successful “investment” of power. State money invested in it repulsed in full.

    Is the author drunk or fulfilling an order?
    All infa is on the network, “Crimea” “paid off” by - (minus) 1 million dollars = 60 million rubles.
    In addition to VO and TRC Zvezda, there is also real life in which only the lazy did not vilify this film.
    "If you want to retire with a girlfriend in a cinema, go to the" Crimea ", just the perfect option, my friends joked like that in our local movie poster ... I went with my wife to an evening session, we were really alone, even though I remembered my youth, and Tom thanks to the domestic cinema
    1. Yuri Guliy
      Yuri Guliy 9 November 2017 18: 14 New
      +6
      Comments by VO readers on the publication “Thinking About Cinema” of November 4 (about the film Crimea) showed that hack (even with the beautiful name Crimea) remains hack and not “an example of a successful“ investment ”of power,” as the author optimistically writes Yuri Podolyaka
      1. Yurasumy
        9 November 2017 20: 08 New
        +1
        And what did the readers of VO collect money for “Crimea”? After all, they did not order the music. Yes, they didn’t like her. And she couldn’t.
  16. Razvedka_Boem
    Razvedka_Boem 9 November 2017 17: 30 New
    +1
    Millions of budget money for various film projects of dubious dignity ..
    And how do those who do such things at their own expense look like this ..
    Py.Sy. The first video was made by an enthusiast.
    Second .. Wargaming is certainly not a separate enthusiast .. But the video is gorgeous ..


    1. Hlavaty
      Hlavaty 9 November 2017 18: 15 New
      +7
      And to be honest, I didn’t understand the Wait Me video. Judging by the fact that the verses sound in Russian, the video was made for a Russian audience. But then what do the Americans ???.
      It is unlikely that Simonov wrote these verses for Americans fighting in the Pacific Ocean with the Japanese. Moreover, the verses were written in August 1941, when the Americans were still sitting on the ass smoothly and there was no talk of any second front or even Lend-Lease. And their censor and future president Truman directly said that we need to see who will lose and help him, so that the massacre between the Russians and Germans lasts as long as possible, so as to bleed both sides as much as possible.
      So one wonders what ... in the video, the main characters are not Russian Ivan and German Hans, but some left-wing Americans with the Japanese?
      It feels like something was stolen from us again ...
      1. Razvedka_Boem
        Razvedka_Boem 9 November 2017 18: 19 New
        +1
        And to be honest, I didn’t understand the video “Wait for me”.

        People fought .. They were forced to do so by politicians ..
        The meaning of the video in this .. It’s not those who are fighting who are calling to go to battle ..
        Simple people are fighting .. And they are like us .. They have a house, family, children .. They just want to live ..
        1. Hlavaty
          Hlavaty 9 November 2017 18: 30 New
          +8
          I do not argue. But this clip looks somehow ... As usual. Russian Vanka took Berlin, and now let him stand on the sidelines, while here the guys from the “right” countries show off on camera. Why then didn’t they take poetry from the “right” countries? And then the next clip will be like an American soldier on some Pacific island singing "Silent Night. Only bullets whistle across the steppe." And the English pilots will sing "We are brave, brave, brave guys" ...
          Besides the fact that it’s just a bad taste, there’s also psychological twisting around.
          1. Razvedka_Boem
            Razvedka_Boem 9 November 2017 18: 36 New
            0
            But this clip looks somehow.

            This video is actually ADVERTISING the game World of Warships.
            If you haven’t played - I recommend, it distracts from the negative ..)
            And who fought in the Pacific? I hope after clarification of this issue, a person with the Ukrainian flag will stop looking for a "double bottom" .. TADAMM .. In the Belarusian video.
            1. Hlavaty
              Hlavaty 9 November 2017 19: 02 New
              +7
              Quote: Razvedka_Boem
              This video is actually ADVERTISING the game World of Warships.

              That is, some enthusiast pulled Simonov’s poems on him?
              Well, if the “man with the Ukrainian flag” is not yet deprived of the right to vote here, then he can only say that completely bloody political games begin with such seemingly innocent videos. Here in Ukraine it is very clearly visible.
              Quote: Razvedka_Boem
              TADAMM .. In the Belarusian video.

              That’s really TADAMM ... If it was Belarusians who stuck Simonov’s poems on Americans, then this upsets even more.
  17. seacap
    seacap 9 November 2017 17: 45 New
    +8
    Tired of already discussing this topic. Everything is clear and understandable, 3 reasons (a bunch of sub-items) for a drop in the level of culture and in particular cinema. First loot, a lot of dough (I also want a villa in Miami and hangouts), for your loot, any whim, at least Mussolini is a Hero of the Soviet Union, while spending less on the shooting process itself. Here you can add the nepotism and caste of our entire self-named elite, with the impossibility of developing true talents, but from the periphery and without money. The second is an ongoing ideological war against our country and people. The substitution of moral and historical values, the creation of a negative perception of history, historical personalities, a negative attitude to the past period of the history of your country, its inferiority is all a war, a war of extermination. our artists from art by thoughtlessness, and most likely due to the greed and preferences of their overseas idols and gods, Hollywood for them Olympus and the limit of all dreams, the pinnacle of creativity and progress, so that in their wretchedness they would be allowed at least to slip on a slipper from an illiterate Mexican with cut breasts and lips like a dumpling. The third, perhaps most important, ruined and destroyed system of primary education and upbringing. The system of educational services, paid higher education has already generated several generations of poorly educated, uncultured, badly educated consumers (hence, by the way, there are many other areas of our life problems), completely incapable of creativity society and creation, with difficulty learning the text more sms, unable to express themselves in their native language, with a reserve of words Allochka-Cannibal (with Soviet education remember who it is). Etc. etc.
    1. BecmepH
      BecmepH 10 November 2017 10: 08 New
      +2
      Bold "+" to you.
  18. 1536
    1536 9 November 2017 18: 32 New
    +3
    It remains to advise all teachers to start making "films" about Masha Dayan, G. Meer, etc. of their fellow tribesmen in the same vein.
  19. a.sirin
    a.sirin 9 November 2017 20: 01 New
    +1
    If there is private ownership of the means of production, then the "path" is that of Russia. that China has one - a liberal model of the economy with a gradual (for some - a very) increase in living standards, and the rest is idle talk + the desire to preserve the "self" on the potato
  20. Karabin
    Karabin 9 November 2017 20: 06 New
    +3
    Modernized soviet. This is the path that Vladimir Putin leads Russia today.

    Here's how to comment? Something exploded, dug up, synthesized in Little Russia, about five years ago. And covered. And inspired. Someone for putting pots on his head, and someone for analytics.
  21. free
    free 9 November 2017 20: 28 New
    +5
    Modernized soviet. This is the path that Vladimir Putin leads Russia today. In some ways, it resembles Chinese, but with its own Russian characteristics.
    STA! ??????
  22. Mavrikiy
    Mavrikiy 9 November 2017 20: 43 New
    +4
    АВТОР Why did Vladimir Putin give money to the "Matilda"
    Dumb question, well, get an adequate answer.
    АВТОР Monarchist-patrioticth.
    Hush, hush, the main thing is to save .... I live in this world for 60 years, I understand the claim, but none .... to put it mildly, I haven’t revealed it, I’m not lucky. so on the card and write down.
    1. There is no need to rave. There are no monarchists. Well, shit that rushing from the west, so you eat.
    2. about the continuity of power. Who will lead the country after Vladimir Putin retires? And here the names of the new leader are not even important. Well .... Monkeys who are waiting for the coconut to fall can sit on their palms ... 10-20 -30 years old ...... that's good, they have a perspective, we have a life, but it’s not for them understand. Quiet .... do not move the palm.
    They are just monkeys.
  23. kunstkammer
    kunstkammer 9 November 2017 20: 49 New
    0
    Quote: parusnik
    and no less than the main character and says ..: while you aim at me, I will sing my last "song" .. It seems that it seemed to revive the picture ...

    Not ... not so! At the end, he says: “I’m painting” ... it will be more correct.
  24. Nemesis
    Nemesis 9 November 2017 20: 56 New
    +8
    And why did Putin give $ 750 million to Uzbekistan and Kyrgyzstan, while Russia is full of problems that need to be addressed, but Putin does not solve them? Why is Putin spending huge amounts of money on olympiads, while SMS is collecting money for operations throughout the country for children? It's just that Putin is not the president that Russia needs and does not need to argue with me ...
    1. Golovan Jack
      Golovan Jack 9 November 2017 21: 10 New
      +8
      Quote: Nemesis
      Nemesis

      1. One (censorship, noun) can ask so many questions, then a hundred sages (c) a proverb will not answer.
      2. Questions that adults can answer are called children's (c) I don’t remember whose.

      Quote: Nemesis
      and no need to argue with me

      Danubinafig argue with you laughing
      1. The comment was deleted.
        1. The comment was deleted.
          1. The comment was deleted.
  25. Loess
    Loess 9 November 2017 21: 16 New
    +1
    Matilda did not look, but I condemn)
  26. kunstkammer
    kunstkammer 9 November 2017 21: 44 New
    +9
    Liberal. In this "direction" today everything is very bad

    Dear author! If everything is very bad for you, then you should not transfer a deeply personal state to the liberoid group of the Government of Russia, which is quite full of health and freshness, headed by their main representative, D. Medvedev.
    He and his associates all the way! And Grefa does not complain about his "bitter" fate ... and Chubais is on horseback and with money ... And Rosatom is steered for budget loans by the one who defaulted 98 of the year ... ash stump that he did not alone, but lives- it’s not bad next to the “patriot” Putin.
    And all, mind you, go to Putin’s friends.
    And they sponsored this dubious film, I think they are, a liberal Moscow party. Of whom in Moscow - stick a stick into the ground, the liberal squeals.
    From this point of view ... we can agree - Putin sponsored this artistic miscarriage.
  27. Radikal
    Radikal 9 November 2017 22: 10 New
    +5
    And there are exactly four ways.
    1. Modernized Soviet.
    2. Liberal.
    3. National Patriotic.
    4. Monarchical-patriotic.
    There is a fifth - nowhere! And it includes 2,3 and 4th! sad
  28. Sotskiy
    Sotskiy 9 November 2017 23: 21 New
    +8
    Modernized soviet. This is the way that Vladimir Putin leads Russia today.

    Is this a joke like that?)))

    But the photo from the celebration of the 100 anniversary of the anniversary of the Great October Socialist Revolution did not find that would even remotely, but somehow connected Putin with the Soviet way).
    1. 34 region
      34 region 10 November 2017 00: 09 New
      +3
      23.21. Soviet! Amazing Served as a convincing signal for investors! How on the outskirts? West come up the economy !? But what do we not want to raise ourselves? Consistently continue the line of integration into the world economy! And how then to understand Putin’s speech about patriotism? In vain kicked out Napoleon, the Entente, Hitler? It was necessary then to integrate ??? belay winked hi
      1. Sotskiy
        Sotskiy 10 November 2017 01: 19 New
        +3
        Are you asking me this? To do this, there is an annual show called: "Ask the President a Question"lol hi
        1. Svetlana
          Svetlana 10 November 2017 11: 19 New
          +3
          Quote: Sovetskiy
          Are you asking me this? To do this, there is an annual show called: "Ask the President a Question"lol hi

          There are only answers to questions: why does my roof leak, and rusty water comes from a faucet.
  29. Radikal
    Radikal 9 November 2017 23: 59 New
    +3
    Quote: kunstkammer
    Liberal. In this "direction" today everything is very bad

    Dear author! If everything is very bad for you, then you should not transfer a deeply personal state to the liberoid group of the Government of Russia, which is quite full of health and freshness, headed by their main representative, D. Medvedev.
    He and his associates all the way! And Grefa does not complain about his "bitter" fate ... and Chubais is on horseback and with money ... And Rosatom is steered for budget loans by the one who defaulted 98 of the year ... ash stump that he did not alone, but lives- it’s not bad next to the “patriot” Putin.
    And all, mind you, go to Putin’s friends.
    And they sponsored this dubious film, I think they are, a liberal Moscow party. Of whom in Moscow - stick a stick into the ground, the liberal squeals.
    From this point of view ... we can agree - Putin sponsored this artistic miscarriage.

    good drinks
  30. Prometheus
    Prometheus 10 November 2017 07: 10 New
    +1
    The receiver is a radio. And the successor will take the post as follows.
  31. Shurale
    Shurale 10 November 2017 07: 18 New
    0
    Why did Vladimir Putin give money to the "Matilda"

    Why the hell with Matilda, that's why he gave money for the upcoming and other films of this class?
  32. Alex66
    Alex66 10 November 2017 07: 21 New
    +8
    After the Crimea, Putin and his liberal government (not the new Soviet one) pressed the brakes so sharply that no patriotic manifestations are still noticeable. The same "28 Panfilovites" were withdrawn with the funds raised. Putin and the government do not need patriots; consumers who do not know how to analyze the situation are needed. look at the promises of Putin and Medvedev after coming to power (there is a video on the Internet), nothing has been done, the promises have not been fulfilled and we will choose them again, because the Communists are led by Zyuganov, whose task is to make the senile communists out of the Communists.
  33. The comment was deleted.
  34. andrej-shironov
    andrej-shironov 10 November 2017 11: 34 New
    +2
    Quote: Golovan Jack
    Quote: Reklastik
    Man, this is not an indicator at all - the "town" where you live

    Appeal to "you" here is considered rudeness, in the know?
    The town is quite an indicator for itself, the person expressed his opinion, and, in general, I join this opinion.
    Quote: Reklastik
    The town of Pervomaisk, Nizhny Novgorod region, for example

    And what is wrong there? Only more specific.
    Quote: Reklastik
    I also have experience applying to the government for medical surgical services for a 2-year-old child. Not for free. Expensive...

    ... out of turn, right? I’ll console you - in a Union without blat, you wouldn’t crawl past the line for money. And the queue was under the Union, oddly enough.

    Other uninteresting.

    The whole point of your post in the last sentence. And do not lie about the queues under the Union, at that time I was already “conscious”. Corruption was and money meant a lot like blat, but SUCH CORRUPTION has never happened!
  35. Tektor
    Tektor 10 November 2017 11: 44 New
    +2
    I don’t know why Yurasumi saw in the film what I didn’t see ... And I saw that the imperial throne was swinging, and soon a Russian peasant, or rather Russia itself, would not only slam his face. But this is a sideline. And the main thing is that we are all human people, even heir to the throne, and even artists of large and small theaters. The film is about complex relationships and the struggle for one’s right to be human.
  36. Mar.Tirah
    Mar.Tirah 10 November 2017 13: 01 New
    0
    Quote: CONTROL
    ..and what happened? He arrived - because the “revolution in Russia” could have happened without him!

    Well, since it could have happened without him, why do you hate him so much?
  37. parma
    parma 10 November 2017 13: 23 New
    +2
    Yes, there is nothing anti-Russian or anti-Orthodox in this film! If it weren’t for the nyash-mash-Crimea-OUR, no one would have noticed, like dozens of films! True, because of the choice of a period in history, I couldn’t go unnoticed completely, and this was a puncture (although when I went a week after the premiere, the hall was full, so I think it’s not a puncture) the authors of the film. There will always be such people as the author of the article writes that someone is forcing us to be proud of Nikolai or not ... I don’t know, no one is forcing anything on me, neither is the film! Nikolai (and Alexander 3) in the film are shown simply by PEOPLE, and with power, money, advantages and disadvantages, but people! Replace Nikolai with an ordinary, ordinary person and get the usual melodrama! The only thing that really upset was Kozlovsky (I don’t like him in principle, and here he is a character neither village nor town, but he’s an all-Russian “star”) and mysticism (and this is apparently connected with the character of Alexandra Fedorovna) .. You still start discussing the series on Russia-1, going somewhere around 14:00 and discuss their anti-Russian and harm to the brain of the beholder ...
  38. svp67
    svp67 10 November 2017 14: 35 New
    +1
    Author are you talking about?
    Nicholas II is represented by a man who is not only unable to rule the country, but also clearly unworthy of this high honor.
    Do you think otherwise? So no. History clearly showed that Nicholas-2 turned out to be a WASTE ruler.
    The film does not have the adamant and unshakable Russian patriot tsar, as he was according to the official version. There is an ordinary sovereign, with his weaknesses and cockroaches in his head.
    That is, it was CYBORG and he had nothing human?
    Moreover, even his father, Emperor Alexander III, is shown from far from the best side.
    You know, everything should have its measure, including your stupidity. Unlike his son, Emperor Alexander went on to reproach the circumstances and SPAS his family and other people, even at the cost of his life. He was a very strong physically and spiritually man.
  39. Wengr
    Wengr 10 November 2017 20: 53 New
    +2
    There is no adamant and unwavering Russian patriot tsar in the film as he was according to the official version. - what?! Are you talking about the mediocrity that bleached Russia ?!
  40. Esoteric
    Esoteric 11 November 2017 12: 24 New
    +1
    The film "Matilda" is as historical as the film "Crimea"

    You have never seen the films: “Suvorov”, “Admiral Ushakov”, “Ships storming the bastions”, “They fought for their homeland”, “Alive and dead” ... These are historical films ... And the comics commissioned have a different color. Like Stalingrad, like Crimea ...
  41. Stegosaurus Brontosaurus
    Stegosaurus Brontosaurus 11 November 2017 15: 39 New
    0
    Quote: seacap
    ... Little Allies

    Well, what are you ?!