Russia ranked first in the world in the number of tanks, infantry fighting vehicles and RZSO

73
More than 25 thousand units of new armored and automotive equipment, 4 thousand modern models of missile and artillery weapons were delivered to the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation from 2012 to 2017, which allowed Russia to take first place in the world in terms of quantity tanks, infantry fighting vehicles (BMPs) and multiple launch rocket systems (MLRS), said Army Deputy Secretary General Dmitry Bulgakov.

Russia ranked first in the world in the number of tanks, infantry fighting vehicles and RZSO




Over the five-year period, from 2012 to 2017 a year, more than 25 thousands of units of armored and motor vehicles and 4 thousands of modern missile and artillery weapons were delivered to the troops, which allowed the Russian Federation to take the first place in the world in the number of tanks, infantry fighting vehicles and RSZO
- Bulgakov said in an interview with the official publication of the Russian Ministry of Defense - the newspaper "Krasnaya Zvezda"

According to him, more than 80 samples of modern technology have been adopted over the years.

I mean rocket and artillery armament, tanks, automobiles, equipment of rear services. Today, the share of modern weapons and military equipment in the fixed nomenclature is already more than 50%
- clarified the army general.

At the same time, Bulgakov noted that the equipment listed by him was ready for use.

The enterprises of the military-industrial complex and the regular repair and restoration bodies, which is also important, brought the level of serviceability of the equipment to 98%. Everything in our army is on the move, everything is ready for use as intended
- He assured.
  • Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

73 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +9
    8 November 2017 12: 42
    The armor is strong and our tanks are fast,
    And our people are full of courage ...
    1. +10
      8 November 2017 12: 44
      If the Eurowehrmacht tucks into us again, we must drive it to Gibraltar by something. Not on foot.
      1. +6
        8 November 2017 12: 50
        If the Eurowehrmacht tucks into us again

        this is the inconsistency ... Russia is stronger than each individual country of a potential adversary ... but not in total !!!! those. NATO was and will be stronger ... and parity with them is not needed !!!! just a couple of exercises per year Strategic Missile Forces ....
        1. +17
          8 November 2017 12: 54
          Do you think that NATO is such a close-knit association? Yes, they will "split" at the very first "rascal". There is no war as such, but they are already "biting".
          1. +4
            8 November 2017 12: 56
            when the democratic hegemon builds them up ... builds them in a column in two and drives them to our border, their contradictions will end ... and where are they biting ???? in Poland and the Tribaltic, rotations take place regularly ... without noise and dust according to the approved plan ....
            1. +1
              8 November 2017 12: 59
              It is foolish, however, not to see the obvious. But god, you are a judge!
              1. +5
                8 November 2017 13: 00
                I see the obvious so far - the concentration of NATO forces at the Russian borders ...
            2. +1
              8 November 2017 16: 29
              Quote: d ^ Amir
              when a democratic hegemon builds them up ...

              what what will be building detachments ???? wassat wassat laughing laughing laughing
              1. +1
                9 November 2017 02: 21
                In WWII, it was enough for the Germans to give out belts with the inscription "God is with us, it is true with us" so that they fight as if possessed.

                A little savvy and the correct flow of material to the media and cyborgs will go on the attack on bloody gebnya%)
          2. +1
            8 November 2017 14: 27
            Quote: afrikanez
            There is no war as such, but they are already "biting".


            Hmm ... But war can still unite THEM ???
            Especially against a tidbit like Russia ...
            1. 0
              9 November 2017 02: 22
              If you do not be shy about your complexes, then everything will be fine.
          3. 0
            9 November 2017 00: 36
            Quote: afrikanez
            Do you think that NATO is such a close-knit association? Yes, they will "split" at the very first "rascal". There is no war as such, but they are already "biting".

            What about the united AKs in Europe, knocked together from the NATO countries in Europe, since the collapse of the USSR and the ATS, there have only been more of them, and in quality they surpass almost any of our associations in terms of firepower and mobility ... they only strengthen the troops, and of course the theater of operations is shifting somewhat eastward ... in essence, these are NATO general forces of the second throw in Europe ....
            Having created strike groups from European NATO countries, the British and Americans, meanwhile, withdrew their AKs from Europe, suspecting that Russia, in the absence of parity with NATO in Europe, is more likely to use its ICBMs and tactical nuclear weapons on European satellites ...
            So I won’t be surprised if in five years an analogue of the British-Rhine army from the Germans, Poles and BENELUX countries appears in the Bialystok ledge area ... so that the Russian Federation is doomed if it is not to return the former USSR under its control, then at least take control not only the Donbass, but also the northern regions of Ukraine ...
        2. +3
          8 November 2017 13: 01
          Quote: d ^ Amir
          If the Eurowehrmacht tucks into us again

          this is the inconsistency ... Russia is stronger than each individual country of a potential adversary ... but not in total !!!! those. NATO was and will be stronger ... and parity with them is not needed !!!! just a couple of exercises per year Strategic Missile Forces ....

          And if they are so badly fucked, why is Russia still not capitulated? Maybe because homosexuals are much more vile on merit than on exploits? If we count on the heads, then we are ambets! And if in spirit? Yes, and supported by the BEST technology in the world?
          1. +3
            8 November 2017 13: 06
            Well, on the topic of "capitulation", so the detail of the body to them in the face and on the collar that the head did not hang ... well, for example, we do not have 2,5 thousand combat aircraft !!!! no !!!!! and it is not necessary!!!! for the money can not stand it !!!!! this is what we are talking about !!!! no need to be wired on their wiring !!!!! Do you need a sufficient number of troops put ??? apparently already very close to this ... and that's enough !!! two Strategic Rocket Forces exercises per year cleanse the brains even better than statistics on the admission of new equipment to the troops ...
            1. +5
              8 November 2017 14: 09
              To neutralize their air fleet, Russia is creating an effective air defense system. So that their pilots sit in the cockpit, and not just fly. And yet combined arms exercises are absolutely necessary! Otherwise, it will not be an army, but a large armed crowd of gouging.
              1. 0
                8 November 2017 15: 15
                And against air defense they have enough long-range missiles. Only nuclear weapons, the rest will not pull economically
                1. +2
                  8 November 2017 16: 04
                  Quote: BlackMokona
                  And against air defense they have enough long-range missiles. Only nuclear weapons, the rest will not pull economically

                  The missile is also a target for near-air defense.
                  1. 0
                    9 November 2017 02: 26
                    Attack missiles are cheaper than air defense missiles.

                    And their industry is much better developed.

                    All hope for nuclear weapons.

                    But they are not building the whole missile defense system and sooner or later the number will turn into quality.
                    1. +2
                      9 November 2017 10: 38
                      American rockets are the cheapest rockets in the world! As well as tanks, planes and other crap. Gee gee gee!
      2. +2
        8 November 2017 14: 24
        If the Eurowehrmacht tucks into us again

        YARS immediately this rot am
    2. +4
      8 November 2017 12: 45
      Would be even faster in other industries ..
      Quote: bagr69
      The armor is strong and our tanks are fast,
      And our people are full of courage ...
      1. +7
        8 November 2017 12: 48
        "Give the State 20 years of peace, internal and external, and you will not recognize the current Russia."
        P.A. Stolypin.
        1. +13
          8 November 2017 12: 55
          Nearly twenty years of peace and oil under $ 100. Medvedev summed up the modernization of Russia:
          We just failed, we did nothing in this direction.
          1. +11
            8 November 2017 12: 58
            Quote: MoJloT
            Almost twenty years of peace

            2 Chechen, constant pressure from the West, a mess in Ukraine and Georgia, a couple of WORLD crises, is that calm ??
            Quote: MoJloT
            oil under $ 100

            Thanks to this, we have the Stabilization Fund and large gold and foreign exchange reserves. This is not counting the updated army and other nishtyakov. Or is it bad in your opinion?
            1. +1
              8 November 2017 13: 00
              In principle, YES, if not so many who were supposed to sleep, this could have been avoided. But I tell you about 2000-2017
              1. +2
                8 November 2017 13: 07
                There will always be problems.
                Quote: MoJloT
                But I tell you about 2000-2017

                Well, my statements (except for the Chechen ones) are true for this periud.
                1. 0
                  8 November 2017 16: 43
                  So this is the main thing; everything else is no longer so important.
              2. +2
                8 November 2017 16: 32
                Quote: MoJloT
                But I tell you about 2000-2017

                and where was calm there ??? how many raked from the 2000 mess from the 90s ??? it is still being raked !!!
                1. 0
                  9 November 2017 09: 21
                  I quoted a prime minister of the government, who expressed very easily what has been done since the 2000s.
            2. +2
              8 November 2017 14: 57
              Quote: Uryukc
              Quote: MoJloT
              Almost twenty years of peace

              2 Chechen, constant pressure from the West, a mess in Ukraine and Georgia, a couple of WORLD crises, is that calm ??
              Quote: MoJloT
              oil under $ 100

              Thanks to this, we have the Stabilization Fund and large gold and foreign exchange reserves. This is not counting the updated army and other nishtyakov. Or is it bad in your opinion?

              Yes, everything is fine, only Medvedev is bad. Change iPhone time.
              1. 0
                8 November 2017 15: 04
                Quote: Primoos
                Medvedev is bad

                I think so, the government needs it as it is:
                1. it is clear that he is not a competitor to Putin,
                2. he apparently is apparently extremely independent, judging by the delay in the outbreak of war with Georgia, during which Pu managed to return from a business trip,
                3. maybe it's a compromise figure,
                4. Sure "heir" - not he.
            3. 0
              9 November 2017 02: 30
              It’s a very calm time, if compared with the turmoil after Ivan the Terrible and the capture of Moscow by the Poles.

              Very calm compared to the 1917 revolution.

              In short, finding noticeably more turbulent times is not difficult.
          2. +3
            8 November 2017 12: 59
            Nearly twenty years of peace and oil under $ 100
            Please name at least one calm year. smile
            Every day, it’s sanctions, then Ukraine, then Syria, then the USA with its quacks ...
            1. 0
              8 November 2017 13: 03
              You watch more on TV then you’ll get in general paranoia.
              1. +2
                8 November 2017 13: 04
                I don’t have a TV at all ... I don’t have time to watch something on the mailbox, at dinner I only read a few articles, and in the evening I’ll be sleeping.
                1. +1
                  8 November 2017 13: 06
                  I do not know your life situation, but if it is a strong-willed decision, it is quite worthy of respect.
                  1. +1
                    9 November 2017 02: 33
                    I have already switched off the telly for 2 years, only at a party I look out of the corner of my eye.

                    Comp easily replaces the TV.

                    The main reason, the quality of the material has fallen dramatically, it is simply impossible to watch.
          3. 0
            8 November 2017 17: 53
            Quote: MoJloT
            Nearly twenty years of peace and oil under $ 100. Medvedev summed up the modernization of Russia:
            We just failed, we did nothing in this direction.

            $ 100 for oil came to us sideways.

            It is important for Russia to prescribe in the constitution that it is impossible to sell the country's natural resources abroad, but only a labor product, products, agricultural product.
            1. 0
              9 November 2017 09: 23
              Everything is correct, but in the foreseeable future it is little feasible.
      2. +9
        8 November 2017 12: 51
        Quote: 210ox
        Would be even faster in other industries ..

        - RosAtom 1 exporter of Atomic Technologies, in the world;
        - RosKosmos is the first in space transportation;
        - We are the first in grain export;
        - I think about successes in the extractive sectors of the economy all the tastes (and again, do not need about needles);
        - We have 3 of our own search engines, far from every country has at least one, Kaspersky sells its products worldwide, so everything is not bad in IT either;
        - Yes, and we also begin to buy equipment, tractors, turbines;
        - There is own AvtoProm and KinoIndustriya, branches are not so widespread, but there are a lot of complaints against them, but their presence is better than their absence.
        Do not again # prosralipolymers.
        1. +1
          8 November 2017 13: 02
          About space and cinema is not a very good example, but there is still something to sell, steal, who argues.
          1. +3
            8 November 2017 13: 06
            Of course, I understand that resonant cases create a reputation, but statistics are not an empty phrase, just read
            Russian cinema in numbers: https://iom.anketolog.ru/2017/06/05/sovremennoe-r
            ossijskoe-kino-v-ocenkah-i-cifrah
            In space, everything is certainly worse than in the USSR, but one must understand for a long time that the Russian Federation is not the Union, at least for now.
        2. +3
          8 November 2017 16: 21
          Quote: Uryukc
          - RosKosmos is the first in space transportation;

          the training manual is outdated, the USA has 26 launches, against 17 for the Russian Federation, for 2017
          http://ecoruspace.me/%D0%97%D0%B0%D0%BF%D1%83%D1%
          81%D0%BA%D0%B8+2017+%D0%B3%D0%BE%D0%B4%D0%B0.html
          1. +2
            8 November 2017 16: 45
            We are in trouble with space, without any prospects.
            1. 0
              8 November 2017 17: 36
              Quote: MoJloT
              We are in trouble with space, without any prospects.

              There are always prospects, the Bolsheviks were much more difficult.
              1. 0
                9 November 2017 09: 24
                I agree, breaking up an empire, starving tens of millions, is not so simple.
                1. 0
                  9 November 2017 17: 39
                  Quote: MoJloT
                  I agree, to destroy the empire,

                  Do you hear the historian, about the February coup of 1917 and the interim government heard anything? Your beloved tsar, the liberals overthrew a rag))
                  Quote: MoJloT
                  starving tens of millions is not so simple.

                  In RI, famine was familiar with the term "Holodomor" or you worry solely about the "victims of the Reds" and didn’t care about the rest?
                  The Reds not only preserved the territory of the state, but also increased them, and thanks to them, you do not know what hunger is, the development of Space is also for the USSR.
          2. +1
            8 November 2017 17: 32
            Quote: Stirbjorn
            US 26 launches, versus 17 for the Russian Federation, for 2017

            I did not know, let the latter, but not the latter. And to be fair to the end, and where is the budget of Roscosmos, can you tell? I think it’s clear that NASA’s budget is unrivaled.
            Quote: Stirbjorn
            the training manual is outdated

            Be sure to run into rudeness?
    3. +1
      8 November 2017 16: 28
      Quote: bagr69
      The armor is strong and our tanks are fast,
      And our people are full of courage ...

      on your knees wassat wassat good good good laughing laughing
  2. +2
    8 November 2017 12: 45
    That's right! Resources and property must be somehow protected
  3. +4
    8 November 2017 12: 49
    According to him, more than 80 samples of modern technology have been adopted over the years.

    As Soviet technology was, it is.
    Boomerangs, Almaty, T50 in the backyard.
    Unless, Almaz Antey pleases and new submarines went.
  4. +1
    8 November 2017 12: 49
    Congratulations to the BTV of the Russian Federation. hi
    1. +2
      8 November 2017 13: 14
      With what? With the fact that the tanks are only deeply and very deeply modernized? But what's the point if the T72 B3 is a modernization parody, with slots between the remote sensing just to make it easy for the shell to get there? ?? what
      1. +1
        8 November 2017 13: 26
        Quote: Herkulesich
        With what? With the fact that the tanks are only deeply and very deeply modernized? But what's the point if the T72 B3 is a modernization parody, with slots between the remote sensing just to make it easy for the shell to get there? ?? what

        Well, the article has such a festive headline that congratulations themselves are requested.
      2. +1
        8 November 2017 16: 40
        Quote: Herkulesich
        with gaps between the remote sensing just to easily get there a shell? ??

        what what what and often do you get there ??? wassat wassat lol lol lol
  5. +2
    8 November 2017 12: 54
    As far as I remember, we were always the first. By their number.
    1. 0
      8 November 2017 13: 38
      Even if their number stopped, as a rule ...
  6. +1
    8 November 2017 13: 07
    Russia ranked first in the world in the number of tanks, infantry fighting vehicles and RZSO

    And in terms of quality? All the junk of Soviet production, that’s when there will be Almaty, Boomerangs and so on, then there will be something to be proud of.
  7. +1
    8 November 2017 13: 11
    The photo in the title is out of place, because T14 does not enter combat units, this will happen in 2 years, not earlier.
  8. +1
    8 November 2017 13: 37
    Youth would be more often engaged. Her education .. And the iron is good.
  9. +4
    8 November 2017 14: 28
    It’s interesting, but who used to be - I’m thinking the same Russia? With such reserves left over from the USSR, they would not have entered yet ... the same new tanks are negligible, mostly T-72 modernized
  10. +1
    8 November 2017 14: 57
    More than 25 thousand units the new armored and automotive vehicles, 4 thousands of modern models of missile and artillery weapons delivered to the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation from 2012 to 2017 year,
    The new and refurbished / modernized two big differences actually.
  11. +2
    8 November 2017 14: 58
    Russia ranked first in the world in the number of tanks, infantry fighting vehicles and RZSO

    And before that, where were we? wassat
    1. 0
      8 November 2017 15: 17
      At the forefront. laughing
  12. 0
    8 November 2017 15: 09
    Russia ranked first in the world in the number of tanks, infantry fighting vehicles and RZSO
    That is, the amount of armored vehicles of the whole world is less than what is now in service with us? belay What a bold statement! wassat
    1. +9
      8 November 2017 15: 25
      Quote: Radikal
      Russia ranked first in the world in the number of tanks, infantry fighting vehicles and RZSO
      That is, the amount of armored vehicles of the whole world is less than what is now in service with us? belay What a bold statement! wassat

      Exactly Yes
      And according to your logic, the weightlifter who took first place in the competition raised more than all his rivals in total laughing
  13. 0
    8 November 2017 15: 51
    Quote: Golovan Jack
    Quote: Radikal
    Russia ranked first in the world in the number of tanks, infantry fighting vehicles and RZSO
    That is, the amount of armored vehicles of the whole world is less than what is now in service with us? belay What a bold statement! wassat

    Exactly Yes
    And according to your logic, the weightlifter who took first place in the competition raised more than all his rivals in total laughing

    This is not my logic, but the logic of the article title! tongue
    1. The comment was deleted.
  14. RL
    0
    8 November 2017 16: 41
    There is power - no mind.
  15. 0
    8 November 2017 17: 20
    Quote: bagr69
    The armor is strong and our tanks are fast,
    And our people are full of courage ...

    In the ranks are brave tankers, and before the battle they do in their pants ... And did they put a lot of really new tanks? And the crews are perfectly trained for the year of service?
  16. 0
    8 November 2017 18: 32
    Probably this amount was counted with modernization. Otherwise, it’s just not clear where so much was produced.
  17. 0
    8 November 2017 22: 06
    Quote: Stirbjorn
    Quote: Uryukc
    - RosKosmos is the first in space transportation;

    the training manual is outdated, the USA has 26 launches, against 17 for the Russian Federation, for 2017
    http://ecoruspace.me/%D0%97%D0%B0%D0%BF%D1%83%D1%
    81%D0%BA%D0%B8+2017+%D0%B3%D0%BE%D0%B4%D0%B0.html

    Lol, but so far only the Russian Federation can deliver a person into space, most missiles in the USA are powered by Russian engines.
  18. 0
    8 November 2017 22: 08
    Quote: vinni-puk
    Youth would be more often engaged. Her education .. And the iron is good.

    In the USSR, norms were brought up and it saved him?
  19. 0
    8 November 2017 23: 44
    Quote: Golovan Jack
    Quote: Radikal
    Quote: Golovan Jack
    Quote: Radikal
    Russia ranked first in the world in the number of tanks, infantry fighting vehicles and RZSO
    That is, the amount of armored vehicles of the whole world is less than what is now in service with us? belay What a bold statement! wassat

    Exactly Yes
    And according to your logic, the weightlifter who took first place in the competition raised more than all his rivals in total laughing

    This is not my logic, but the logic of the article title! tongue

    Do not unlock - it is yours. But, if the first time did not understand - that's all.
    Medicine is powerless request

    You can see the medic, and even understand the armored vehicles - just Scrabble! wassat
  20. 0
    9 November 2017 10: 56
    this is not an indicator, it was necessary to start with air defense and aviation ...

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"