The NATO will discuss the creation of two new commands

20
On Wednesday and Thursday, the NATO defense ministers will agree at the meeting to create two new commands in the structure of the alliance, as well as discuss the nuclear threat from the DPRK and the situation in Afghanistan. RIA News.





Earlier, NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg said that the alliance intends to evaluate the effectiveness of its current command structure and check whether it meets current challenges.

On Wednesday, the ministers will approve a framework plan, which involves the creation of two new commands: "to protect maritime transport routes in the Atlantic to ensure the safe movement of forces from North America to Europe and to improve the infrastructure for the transfer of troops and equipment inside Europe."

According to the Secretary General, "the decision on the location of the new structures will be made at the meeting of the Alliance Defense Ministers in February 2018 of the year." The creation of new units will put an end to the reduction of command structures undertaken at the end of the Cold War.

Stoltenberg reminded journalists that “by the end of the Cold War, about 33 thousand people were involved in the 22 command”, while “now the number of personnel of the seven commands is about seven thousand”.

In addition, according to the Secretary General, now "in every military operation, in every possible and prospective military mission and operation of NATO there will be a cyber component."

The ministers will also discuss the threat from the DPRK.

Stoltenberg said that during a recent visit to Japan and South Korea he was convinced that "the threat from Pyongyang requires a global response." He stressed that "NATO is firmly defensive, has the necessary capabilities and must respond decisively to any aggression."

As for the policy of the NATO mission “Strong support” in Afghanistan, it will not actually change. The only significant change will be the increase in the contingent from the current 13 thousand to 16 thousand people, including by 50% due to the efforts of the United States.
20 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +5
    8 November 2017 11: 00
    Let’s have more, more commands, officers and generals in headquarters. And they will devour money for a salary - unmeasured, and the security of our borders will increase.
    1. +10
      8 November 2017 11: 03
      Quote: Mountain Shooter
      Let’s have more, more commands, officers and generals in headquarters.

      And give everyone a revolver, with one cartridge! If they understand what to do with it ...
      1. +5
        8 November 2017 11: 30
        And what - jumping from the windows is no longer fashionable? feel
        1. +9
          8 November 2017 11: 49
          Not aesthetically pleasing! There is a lot of dirt ... And in the closed coffins of the `` heroes '' you have to bury ...
          1. +5
            8 November 2017 11: 59
            Well, yes, I completely forgot - they are civilized aesthetes ...
    2. 0
      8 November 2017 11: 12
      Somehow, initially the North Atlantic Alliance spread its influence to all oceans and all corners of the world. A navel will not tear? bully
      1. 0
        9 November 2017 18: 52
        Stirred, vipers, hissed. Again they start something unkind .... so that it was empty!
  2. +3
    8 November 2017 11: 01
    NATO has a rather difficult and confusing management system ... however, from our point of view, this is more a plus than a minus! laughing
    1. +1
      8 November 2017 11: 31
      In NATO, there are more minuses for its structure than pluses. A scarecrow in a European garden. And the naivety of small NATO countries. That in the event of a threat to them, someone will carry chestnuts out of the fire for them. There is no security of individual small countries at the expense of others. Illusion. These are simply the interests of the large countries of the union in keeping small ones in the sphere of their interests.
  3. +4
    8 November 2017 11: 21
    And so that all these commands command the same units. On the other hand - to crush united forces -
    also a brilliant idea. No matter how you look, the good news is today!
    1. +9
      8 November 2017 12: 40
      And they need to increase the number of commands and personnel. lol
  4. +1
    8 November 2017 11: 22
    Quote: Mountain Shooter
    Let’s have more, more commands, officers and generals in headquarters. And they will devour money for a salary - unmeasured, and the security of our borders will increase.

    ----------------------------------
    Weapons will be required for the newly formed battalions and the supposedly deployed corps and divisions in their place. McCain is already rubbing his sweaty palms, there will be work on lobbying for new allocations for arms magnates. Yes, and Trump is already taking away bread from McCain, demanding to increase arms exports and bringing in American weapons to his allies.
  5. 0
    8 November 2017 11: 22
    November 1.6-7 this year in Brussels. Belgium. the autumn session of the EU military committee at the level of chiefs of general staffs of the union countries
    2. November 7 this year In Moscow, a meeting of the Board of the Russian Ministry of Defense took place, at which the activities of the military command and control bodies for the implementation of the May decrees of the President of Russia in 2012 and the activities of the Ministry of Defense Action Plan until 2020 were analyzed.
    3 .. November 8 - 9 this year Meetings of the North Atlantic Council (NAC) at the level of defense ministers will be held at NATO headquarters in Brussels

    Moscow-a hit in exactly the Center! good
  6. +1
    8 November 2017 11: 25
    Quote: Finches
    NATO has a rather difficult and complicated management system ...

    ----------------------------
    In the treaty itself, the notorious Fifth paragraph, according to which the country party decides how to respond to the threat of attack, then this decision must be approved by parliament. This is already a complicated bureaucratic procedure. And for the vast country of Macedonia, the attack could end in occupation in about 15 minutes. hi laughing
  7. +1
    8 November 2017 11: 28
    involves the creation of two new commands

    We are already accustomed to how NATO is breeding, and you won’t confuse us with this. Let them cook whatever they want in their pots. The main thing is that we always have at hand an effective response to this breeding hydra.
  8. 0
    8 November 2017 11: 39
    Quote: Anarchist

    And give everyone a revolver, with one cartridge! If they understand what to do with it ...

    Buzz, bee, buzz, NATO is really preparing to fight, and you are smart here and joking.
  9. 0
    8 November 2017 11: 45
    ... another granny sawmill! ... bully
  10. 0
    8 November 2017 11: 49
    On November 5, 2016, the 3rd ABCT (American Armored Brigade Combat Group) began its movement to Europe, loading the first train going to the American port with military equipment and containers. On December 2, a week earlier than planned, loading was completed - about 2800 pieces of equipment (military vehicles, trucks, trailers) and containers were loaded onto trains.
    Three ships with horizontal loading and unloading (Ro-Ro) of the American company American Roll-on Roll-off Carrier (ARC) - Resolve (“Resolve”), Freedom (“Freedom”) and Endurance (“Resistance”) were used to transport the brigade by sea. ").
    At the same time, the total loading area amounted to more than 37 thousand square meters (400 thousand square feet). The total weight of only loaded military equipment (tanks, infantry fighting vehicles and self-propelled howitzers) amounted to 10 660 tons. The loading of equipment and equipment took one week and was completed on December 21. Ships departed for Europe from the port of Beaumont (Texas).
    The first ship (Resolve) moored in Bremerhaven on January 4, 2017, and Freedom and Endurance arrived at the port on January 8. Unloading of military equipment began on January 6. To send it to Poland, 900 wagons with a total length of 14 kilometers were required. It was stated that from January 7 to 16, three trains with military equipment will be sent daily.
    The first Abrams tanks were unloaded from a train in Poland on January 9, the first self-propelled howitzers on January 11. In addition, convoys of military vehicles were organized to Poland through Hamburg, Lower Saxony, Saxony-Anhalt and Brandenburg. On January 12, a convoy of the 1st battalion of the 8th infantry regiment arrived in Zagan. Http://eurasia.expert/voyna-na-poroge-zache
    m-ssha-perebrasyvayut-voyska-v-polshu /
  11. +4
    8 November 2017 11: 50
    "The threat posed by Pyongyang requires a global response."

    Even the very existence of an independent country is a threat to NATO countries. After all, Pyongyang does not threaten to bomb someone simply because some country does not like it, but clearly says that nuclear weapons are a deterrent from any aggression. And there’s more than enough aggression from NATO countries and their allies.
  12. +1
    9 November 2017 12: 15
    He emphasized that "NATO is firmly defensive, has the necessary capabilities and must decisively respond to any aggression."
    It is interesting how? As for the defensive ....