For five years, 12 missile regiments rearmed at Yars complexes

The share of modern weapons in the Strategic Missile Forces of Russia (RVSN) has increased over the past five years from 42% to 66%, said Army General Valery Gerasimov, Chief of the General Staff of the Russian Armed Forces.

The Strategic Missile Forces received more than 80 intercontinental ballistic missiles. For five years, the 12 missile regiments were reequipped for the new-generation Yars missile systems. The share of modern models (weapons) in the Strategic Missile Forces increased from 42 to 66%, and the ability to overcome the missile defense system increased by 30%

- He said at the board.

According to him, in the strategic nuclear forces, new missile systems of various types of bases have been created, modernized and taken into combat.

At the same time, promising complexes are being developed, including those with a heavy intercontinental ballistic missile, Gerasimov noted.

Their technical characteristics will make it possible to use more effective types of missile equipment and means for overcoming missile defense.

- said Gerasimov.

Comments

[Anarchist]

These complexes, How awl in Boku from the Americans!
In the nineties, when Satan was abandoned, the Americans asked our people to abandon the wheeled ... When asked why? They replied - we cannot plan the strike ...
How did Yeltsin not follow their lead? Apparently forgot to hangover ...

[Berber]

As far as I understand, the problem with the media is being solved. And then there are warheads, but there are not enough carriers.

[Going]

“The Strategic Missile Forces received more than 80 intercontinental ballistic missiles. 12 missile regiments have been rearmed with the new generation Yars missile systems in five years. The share of modern models (weapons) in the Strategic Missile Forces increased from 42 to 66%,

By updating they are catching up to underwater strategists.

[Evgenijus]

Anarchist:

when satan was abandoned

Did not refuse ...
In May 2006 of the year, the Strategic Missile Forces include 74 mine launchers with ICBM P-36M UTTH and P-36М2, each equipped with 10 warheads.
https://topwar.ru/2567-car-raketa.html

[Anarchist]

Wrote it wrong: not `` refused '', but `` refused ''! Those. the Americans almost pushed through, but ... Although they refused from the railway trains!

[Evgenijus]

Anarchist:

Although railway train abandoned!

Isn't Barguzin on the railway platform? Better "Well done" will be ...

[Anarchist]

Read from the beginning! I was talking about the nineties, then they refused completely !!! Recently began to restore

[pafegosoff]

In 1996, I personally met the train on the haul ... All crossings are locked with a watch from the railway foremen and foremen. The train schedule is being adjusted. Sleepers - concrete, rails - welded. In the cabin of a locomotive, as a rule, there is an instructor from a local depot (such as a pilot on a ship). The roar from the train ... You can hear it ten kilometers away. The feeling that the Mi-8 helicopter is flying close (except for diesel locomotives, diesel power plants are working) ...

[RASKAT]

How many rocket launchers are in the regiment? It seems to me that there are three divisions of a couple of three installations, a total of 6-9?

[Anarchist]

The missile division consists of 5 missile regiments, in the regiment - 3 divisions. If "yars" then on the division of their launchers 3 pcs. A total of 45 launchers per division. How many missiles to them are not known. At least 1 on the launcher for sure, but the division also has tractors.

[andr327]

in the regiment there are normally 3 divisions with 3 APUs in each, but the regiment is considered on duty if there is at least one APU on the DB. Now there are no divisions of the 5th regimental composition, primarily due to the increased patrolling area.
Launchers and missiles are available, but the regimental structures are in a very sad state. Therefore, they dash through the fields when necessary and when not necessary. But glory to the missilemen: they are on duty in spite of everything, and in spite of everything!

[Settlement Oparyshev]

It is correct that in the fields. In my time, the American ones, found a division on duty in a week. Now it’s faster. When the regiment is at the place of permanent deployment, the meaning of the mobile complex is lost. It is destroyed with the same probability as the mine.

[andr327]

And what is the threatened period now? Let them carry the DB at the hospital and train periodically. the complex is mobile but no one has canceled the motor resource. It is unlikely that we will be able to change such complexes every 3-5 years, the country will definitely remain without pants. And the answer can be performed from the hospital.
Well, try a year, another in the field to be on duty without getting out and 50-60% manned officer staff. What will be the morale and combat state of the personnel. If you are still strong, then we are waiting in the YARS division.
Yes, what would be more interesting for the inspectors, you can throw 6 months a year.

[Settlement Oparyshev]

I will say that the "threatening period" usually does not end with War. The war can only be sudden. We changed the engines to MAZ 547. So, I hope you will not lose weight if you change another engine.
About a year, another in the field otdezhurit.Nadeyus it is more difficult for you in the field than for the Donbass militias for the third year in the trenches, under shelling and under the drg, which the militias periodically cut out. And you are on the same front with them.
Again 25, from the stationary! The stationary is shot, like the landscape of the militia. There now, even from the Grad, you can't shoot, the return flow is very fast.
And again, no one canceled salaries and pensions. We happened here with one weekend, from 4:00 to 21:00, we worked for 20 faces.
Regarding strong, of course, thank you. But age will no longer allow. In the division I am not, but in TRB. To mount a cover with a spacer and an instrument panel, you don't need a lot of force, the SES regulations, I can do the same.
So, educate your people a little more about life in civilian life, will they agree to work and pull your family for 15?

[andr327]

And the fronts beguiled. Strategy and tactics, though interconnected, are fundamentally different. Therefore, for a strategy, war is never sudden, but a battle, an ambush, yes. Yars and Poplars do not go head-on. MAZ, alas, does not carry sand, a strategic missile with launching and support equipment. The APU will be more complicated than the AK; it will be on duty for 25 years, or even more. And the complex needs to be on duty and not to troubleshoot the "six".

[Settlement Oparyshev]

It is impossible to confuse the fronts. Everywhere there are Tornadoes and Hurricanes and air defenses, they are on the database.
Well, how will you be on duty if, for example, the upper device has broken down. Although it can be changed in Krone, there is no way to repair it.

[Sergei75]

Oh, and these wheeled launch pads confuse me, is there any sense from them?
In the event of a surprise missile attack:
- how long will it take to deploy this bandura;
- the movement of this installation across the territory of deployment is clearly less than the radius of destruction (well, not for 100 km. They drive);
- Well, they don't drive all the time, but they stand in hangars, albeit with a sliding roof.
So the question is - why carry it, maybe it would be easier in the mine?
tactical I.O. - undoubtedly.

[Anarchist]

Analysis of the survival of mobile complexes "Topol-M" and "Yars"
topwar.ru/107868-analiz...m..yars.html

In writing this post, I was prompted by a number of critical views on the Topol-M and Yars mobile launchers.

[Sergei75]

everything is somehow vague
"Caponiers, of course, will not save from a direct or close nuclear explosion, but dispersed over a large area, they will effectively keep the launcher from a preemptive strike. Caponiers are able to withstand the impact of a blast wave at a sufficient distance from the epicenter of the explosion ..." - this is 20 km. ?, especially since they are all stationary and their coordinates have long been known to everyone except you and me.
“And I don’t really want to talk about the fairy tales that American satellites carry out round-the-clock real-time monitoring of the Russian Yars. For this, there must always be a spy satellite over every square of the territory of Russia. Imagine what kind of space armada will have to be launched into space! ... "- amateurish thinking, the places of deployment have long been known and only they are controlled, they spend the night at home, this is not a train, and even that does not run constantly.
In general, the article is a shnyaga, for their own, to calm down.

[Anarchist]

Quote: Sergei75

In general, the article is a shnyaga, for their own, to calm down.

What I could, Sergei! What could ...

[serriy]

The same is about Bulava. 40 tons of weight. 9000 km range. Ton of throwable weight.
Redundancy. In everything.
And the boat could be more compact for a smaller rocket. Cheaper. More rockets, more boats. Amers have more headaches.

[NordOst16]

I hope you wrote it sarcastically. Because the maces have a small throwing mass (a little more than a ton). And at the trident ovs, they throw in more than two tons and it does not bother them, with a rocket mass of 60 tons, to install 24 missiles per sub. At the same time, the displacement of an Ohio-type submarine is less than that of the Borei

[Settlement Oparyshev]

These are the "suicide bombers" in the mines, they are destroyed immediately. And the field ones still have to be chased.

[Piramidon]

Quote: Sergei75

So the question is - why carry it, maybe it would be easier in the mine?

Simpler doesn't mean safer. All stationary launchers are at gunpoint. And with today's Yankees strategy of a preemptive strike (it will be aimed primarily at hospitals) - this is fraught with lousy consequences.

[Vlad5307]

Quote: Sergei75

Oh, and these wheeled launch pads confuse me, is there any sense from them?
In the event of a surprise missile attack:
- how long will it take to deploy this bandura;
- the movement of this installation across the territory of deployment is clearly less than the radius of destruction (well, not for 100 km. They drive);
- Well, they don't drive all the time, but they stand in hangars, albeit with a sliding roof.
So the question is - why carry it, maybe it would be easier in the mine?
tactical I.O. - undoubtedly.

Well, so that there is no surprise attack, the early warning system and the SVR must work correctly, this is at least. And being on a permanent database, the unit should have enough time to advance and deploy outside the location. And with the Amerzian concept of a global strike with precision weapons, this is basically impossible (unexpected strike). And here the main thing is to keep your ears on top. Yankees are masters of fighting those who cannot give back - so they worry when new systems are adopted or the current ones are deeply modernized.

[vladimirvn]

Do not be ashamed of your complexes.

[Xscorpion]

Quote: Vlad5307

Quote: Sergei75

Oh, and these wheeled launch pads confuse me, is there any sense from them?
In the event of a surprise missile attack:
- how long will it take to deploy this bandura;
- the movement of this installation across the territory of deployment is clearly less than the radius of destruction (well, not for 100 km. They drive);
- Well, they don't drive all the time, but they stand in hangars, albeit with a sliding roof.
So the question is - why carry it, maybe it would be easier in the mine?
tactical I.O. - undoubtedly.

Well, so that there is no surprise attack, the early warning system and the SVR must work correctly, this is at least. And being on a permanent database, the unit should have enough time to advance and deploy outside the location. And with the Amerzian concept of a global strike with precision weapons, this is basically impossible (unexpected strike). And here the main thing is to keep your ears on top. Yankees are masters of fighting those who cannot give back - so they worry when new systems are adopted or the current ones are deeply modernized.

In our territories, a global strike with non-nuclear weapons, in principle, will not harm our strategic nuclear forces in the outback due to the insufficient flight range of their tomahawks. And in the event of an attack with nuclear missiles, there is definitely half an hour in reserve while the missiles are flying. in the event of an exacerbation of relations, they dissolve in advance in the taiga, and the potential adversary no longer has any desire to continue pumping rights, since only one missile regiment out of 9 installations is dispersed over an area of ​​hundreds of square kilometers, and if it is possible to cover it, then only if half the nuclear arsenal of the states will go only to this positional area of ​​one of our regiments.

[Old26]

Quote: RASKAT

How many rocket launchers are in the regiment? It seems to me that there are three divisions of a couple of three installations, a total of 6-9?

9

Quote: Sergei75

- how long will it take to deploy this bandura;

From the moment of receiving the order - minutes. Even if the launcher is in "Krona"

Quote: Sergei75

- the movement of this installation across the territory of deployment is clearly less than the radius of destruction (well, not for 100 km. They drive);

Why not over 100? The START II treaty limited the deployment area to 2 square kilometers. You can calculate the radius .....

Quote: Sergei75

- Well, they don't drive all the time, but they stand in hangars, albeit with a sliding roof.

Well, of course not 24 hours a day.

[Alexey RA]

Quote: Old26

Why not over 100? The START II treaty limited the deployment area to 2 square kilometers. You can calculate the radius .....

At present, you can even calculate the length of the routes. Fortunately, straight concrete roads with smooth turns stand out very well against the background of the forest (around the same Ozernoye-Vypolzovo).

[Belarus is Russia]

Good news.