Military Review

Daily Mail: Putin offered to restore the military base in Cuba

119
"Two key supporters of Vladimir Putin" put forward a proposal to restore the military base in Cuba. Such a move could lead to a new missile crisis, the Daily Mail newspaper writes. Article leads InoTV.




Our base in Cuba is the naval and aviation in the complex - should be. This is the key point
- the newspaper is quoted by the statement of the first deputy chairman of the Federation Council Committee on Defense Franz Klintsevich

According to him, Moscow must "resolutely respond to the deployment of US missile systems on the border of Russia."

Later, the head of the same committee, Viktor Bondarev, repeated the call, adding that "Russia should consider rebuilding the Russian military base in Vietnam."

I believe that the increase in tension in the world, open interference in the internal affairs of countries - historical Russia's partners do not rule out our return to Latin America,
said Bondarev, adding that such a step should in any case be coordinated with the Cubans.

The author recalls that the Russian base was deployed on the Isle of Freedom in the Havana area in 1962 - “it was then that the Caribbean missile crisis broke out that almost led to a nuclear war. The Soviet base in Cuba was the largest of its kind. ”

The base was closed in 2002 year. Vladimir Putin decided that its service was too expensive for Russia, which by that time had begun to allocate significant funds for the development of a group of reconnaissance satellites.

Bondarev also called for the restoration of a military presence in Asia.

We should also think about the return of the Russian Navy to Vietnam with the permission of the local government,
noted the head of the committee.
Photos used:
http://www.globallookpress.com
119 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. dik-nsk
    dik-nsk 7 November 2017 08: 28 New
    +8
    for what grandmother? oh, these Klintsevichs, the Federation Council is a bunch of talkers
    1. Anarchist
      Anarchist 7 November 2017 08: 31 New
      18
      From Syria Part of the troops will be withdrawn, part of the money will be freed ...
      About the talkers, I agree! I would use another word, but ...
      1. Grandfather
        Grandfather 7 November 2017 08: 35 New
        35
        Quote: Anarchist
        for what grandmother?

        some "colonels" in the "garages" search to conduct, and enough for a dozen bases, at least somewhere ...
        1. The black
          The black 7 November 2017 08: 47 New
          22
          This must be done immediately, and in full. This will be a worthy answer, enough to call them to conscience, they don’t have it!
          1. SRC P-15
            SRC P-15 7 November 2017 08: 51 New
            14
            Daily Mail: Putin offered to restore the military base in Cuba

            If this topic is heavily exaggerated in the media, then the base will be! For now, this is simply a survey of opinions and a hint of the United States.
            1. maxim947
              maxim947 7 November 2017 09: 02 New
              21
              A full-fledged military base in Cuba is, without exaggeration, a matter of national security, and we simply must find money, there are no other options. All these stories about the fact that we don’t need it are bullshit. Even as needed, mericosa are very sensitive to such things.
              1. Vladimir16
                Vladimir16 7 November 2017 09: 49 New
                10
                Quote: Anarchist
                for what grandmother? oh, these Klintsevichs, the Federation Council is a bunch of talkers

                Quote: Dead Day
                some "colonels" in the "garages" search to conduct, and enough for a dozen bases, at least somewhere ...

                Quote: Black
                This must be done immediately, and in full. This will be a worthy answer, enough to call them to conscience, they don’t have it!

                Comrades, you decide who you are going to fight with, with mattresses or with your own people. The Federation Council did not please you, colonels, in your opinion, are completely thieves.
                You look like offended boys who were sent to x and not taken into the game. So in childhood it happened - no one likes bores. But you are not like children. Although, who knows ...
              2. seti
                seti 7 November 2017 09: 57 New
                12
                Quote: maxim947
                A full-fledged military base in Cuba is, without exaggeration, a matter of national security, and we simply must find money, there are no other options. All these stories about the fact that we don’t need it are bullshit. Even as needed, mericosa are very sensitive to such things.

                Well, what will she give us except the minuses? All that we need and so we will collect from space or through intelligence. Technologies are different now. And creation from scratch and content plus payment will fly into a big penny from our pocket. Yes, and the Cuban leadership did not forget to ask? Today they will give the go-ahead and tomorrow Raul will die. Then what to do? And there are not so many ships that are able to sail to Cuba.
                First, put my opinion in your native bases in order and the infrastructure for them, the fleet needs an ocean and not coastal ships. And only then wave your sabers.
                The only bonus from all this is that everywhere you need to blow that in five minutes or maybe in six the base will be not only in Cuba but also in Antarctica. With all the consequences, and in general America kirdyk. Let the creatures rage about. But in reality you need to solve your urgent tasks. And especially in the management of the country.
                1. maxim947
                  maxim947 7 November 2017 10: 03 New
                  +4
                  What space? what intelligence? what new technologies?
                  Here the main question is to provide a lightning fast and quick answer so that even our "partners" do not have illusions.
                  1. Gray brother
                    Gray brother 7 November 2017 10: 40 New
                    0
                    Quote: maxim947
                    Here's the main question in providing a lightning fast and quick answer.

                    I would, in the place of the Americans, destroy such an object in the first place.
                    That the "quick response" was not.
                    1. maxim947
                      maxim947 7 November 2017 10: 45 New
                      +1
                      How's that?
                      In a clumsy way, it looks something like this: A missile flies a certain time, it is detected and a return flies out - this is a deterrent, and the fact that they will try to destroy this object in the first place is absolutely true, and there’s no one it will not be a surprise. The main task is the answer.
                      1. Gray brother
                        Gray brother 7 November 2017 10: 57 New
                        +1
                        Quote: maxim947
                        How's that?

                        Usually. You look at the map - there are small distances.
                        A couple of submarines will be shot off from the coast and that's it - write letters with a small underline.
                  2. You Vlad
                    You Vlad 7 November 2017 13: 01 New
                    +1
                    Quote: maxim947
                    What space? what intelligence? what new technologies?

                    And such that a US nuclear attack on Russia will guarantee a retaliatory nuclear strike that some anti-missile defense, including the US missile defense, will not be able to repel! Why do we need Cuba, if we achieved this without it? more difficult...
                    1. The comment was deleted.
                2. dik-nsk
                  dik-nsk 7 November 2017 11: 05 New
                  +5
                  First, put my opinion in your native bases in order and the infrastructure for them, the fleet needs an ocean and not coastal ships. And only then wave the sabers
                  here, I absolutely agree with you, because some clown blurted out without thinking, and here the floor of the forum was joyful, "and bras were thrown into the sky" (c)
                3. aleks26
                  aleks26 7 November 2017 11: 57 New
                  +3
                  Quote: seti
                  The base was closed in 2002 year. Vladimir Putin decided that its service was too expensive for Russia, which by that time had begun to allocate significant funds for the development of a group of reconnaissance satellites.

                  Quote: seti
                  And creation from scratch and content plus payment will fly into a big penny from our pocket.

                  How many billions of debt did Russia write off to Cuba? 35? Not even a year has passed. Maybe the Cubans would have leased the base for these debts, a hundred years? In my opinion, except Russia, no one writes off so famously debts.
              3. NordUral
                NordUral 8 November 2017 11: 35 New
                0
                The best and most complete base of Russia is the State of Social Justice in Russia.
                When everything that belongs to Russia and the people works for the country and the people.
                But we do not need a base in Cuba, if you think hard.
          2. ID90
            ID90 7 November 2017 09: 11 New
            +7
            Quote: Black
            This must be done immediately, and in full. This will be a worthy answer, enough to call them to conscience, they don’t have it!

            Putin didn’t close it for this, so that he would suddenly open it.
            The Syrians proposed to turn Tartus 15 years ago into a full-fledged base, even carried out surveys and the project was.
            but Moscow sent the funds to Novorossiysk.
            and in Cuba there could still be a base. about an expensive rental is a lie Putin.
            rent cost $ 150 million, and Cuban debt was 30 billion.
            20 years could stand for FREE !!!!
            1. Krasnyiy komissar
              Krasnyiy komissar 7 November 2017 09: 19 New
              +4
              200 years, not 20.
              1. ID90
                ID90 7 November 2017 09: 51 New
                +3
                Quote: Krasnyiy komissar
                200 years, not 20.

                stupid in the morning. thank .
            2. creak
              creak 7 November 2017 10: 30 New
              +6
              Quote: ID90
              Putin didn’t close it for this, so that he would suddenly open it.

              And the “stupid Americans", despite all the Cuban objections, for some reason didn’t close their base in Guantanamo and are not going to do it (they even equipped the prison there as at home) ... But we left, although no one drove us out of there. And after that, the Americans are stupid, but are we the smartest with our reciprocating movements? And the arguments about the lack of money - these are fairy tales for grannies on the porch at the entrance, like there is no money, but you hold on - they just look for the money where they don’t need, although they know where - and suddenly they find out what then. will be what
          3. Burbon
            Burbon 7 November 2017 09: 15 New
            +5
            Quote: Black
            You need to do this immediately, and in full

            Of course you need, but not just what you post, but to raise the standard of living of citizens of the Russian Federation, where is the industry ?? .... where the pancake is energy ??? .... how much should gasoline cost in the Russian Federation? where do the governors and mayors come from? - and why can’t they be chosen? why in 4 years of sanctions - have failed to consolidate the whole country? an increase in housing and communal services and food tariffs amid a decrease in real wages ??? ... it is necessary to change the approach to business in the country, and the clan tycoons (this is half the EDR and all the rest) - to clean the Kotelniy island until they get to the yagel
          4. Nyrobsky
            Nyrobsky 7 November 2017 12: 13 New
            0
            Quote: Black
            This must be done immediately, and in full. This will be a worthy answer, enough to call them to conscience, they don’t have it!

            The key point here is not our desire, but the consent of the government of Cuba and Vietnam. Vietnam has already spoken out about this idea once in the sense that it will not agree to place any bases on its territory, whatever they are because he is for an out-of-bloc status and is not going to be friends against anyone. In Cuba, too, things are not so simple, especially after Russia withdrew its base from there and essentially left this island alone with the United States. Will they want a repetition of this scenario ?. On the other hand, from a year ago, foreign journalists at a pre-conference with GDP already asked him about Russia's return to Cuba and Vietnam, to which he replied: - " What for? We will get the one we need ... "
        2. 210ox
          210ox 7 November 2017 09: 03 New
          +1
          And if you shake the ensigns too ... I’m joking. They mostly pull the army strap with dignity .. Who else would have suggested the President to stop calling enemies “partners” or like .. "My dear Brother Willy .."
          Quote: Dead Day
          Quote: Anarchist
          for what grandmother?

          some "colonels" in the "garages" search to conduct, and enough for a dozen bases, at least somewhere ...
        3. den3080
          den3080 7 November 2017 09: 34 New
          +3
          and if the generals also joke)) Duc will be enough for Cuba, Vietnam, Angola, Mozambique, Libya and even in Nicaragua to dig a channel with the Chinese and put a contingent there (purely dispatch))
      2. weksha50
        weksha50 7 November 2017 09: 28 New
        +2
        Quote: Anarchist
        From Syria Part of the troops will be withdrawn, part of the money will be freed ...


        Officially, Syrian expenses are included in the budget allotted for combat training of troops ... And, as I understand it, Russia does not pay rent in Syria ...
        And in Cuba and Vietnam, you will have to pay a lot of money, plus the organization of the bases themselves, their equipment and maintenance ... This is a lot of money ...
        It’s better to set up the same RTOs, put new helicopters in the Air Force-VKS ...
      3. xetai9977
        xetai9977 7 November 2017 10: 14 New
        +3
        Even the Soviet Union, whose capabilities were many times greater than today's Russia, could not deploy rockets and create a full-fledged base in Cuba. Anything can be chatted, but in fact .... The Americans then forced the Union to remove its missiles, and now they won’t even ceremony.
        1. Setrac
          Setrac 7 November 2017 21: 33 New
          0
          Quote: xetai9977
          The Americans then forced the Union to remove its missiles, and now they won’t even ceremony.

          And now the base is not needed, one Severodvinsk means more than the entire Cuban infrastructure.
      4. Setrac
        Setrac 7 November 2017 21: 29 New
        0
        Quote: dik-nsk
        for what grandmother?

        Quote: Anarchist
        From Syria Part of the troops will be withdrawn, part of the money will be freed ...

        Like a fish needs a bicycle? Why is Russia now a base in Cuba?
    2. Thrall
      Thrall 7 November 2017 08: 35 New
      +5
      Quote: dik-nsk
      for what grandmother? oh, these Klintsevichs, the Federation Council is a bunch of talkers

      Revolutionary Maltsev? I do not recognize you in makeup. smile
      1. The black
        The black 7 November 2017 08: 49 New
        +5
        This should have been done yesterday when the Americans began building and deploying their missile defense systems in Poland and Romania.
        1. PalBor
          PalBor 7 November 2017 09: 17 New
          +5
          There was no need to deduce. And now they will not be allowed back. Even in Cuba, the fifth column is very strong.
          If Raul’s daughter is one of the main fighters for super-rights of LGBT people in the world No. And once barges with them in the bay of Havana ...
          1. creak
            creak 7 November 2017 10: 38 New
            0
            Quote: PalBor
            .Even in Cuba, the fifth column is very strong.

            As they say in Odessa, I apologize to ask, and who is the fourth column in Cuba? And with the third, I think that many also have no clarity - so what about the columns? ... what
            1. PalBor
              PalBor 7 November 2017 14: 27 New
              +3
              This is a stable expression, sorry, idiom.
              1. creak
                creak 7 November 2017 17: 40 New
                +1
                Quote: PalBor
                This is a stable expression, sorry, idiom.

                I am grateful for the clarification, we also heard something about Spain - but this expression is not always used to the point - hence the question about the fourth column, well, like the notorious liberals - some who are completely confused in the definitions ...
      2. dik-nsk
        dik-nsk 7 November 2017 09: 09 New
        +1
        Revolutionary Maltsev?
        and who is it?))
    3. Finches
      Finches 7 November 2017 08: 42 New
      13
      dik-nsk

      The base in Cuba is a decent brick in the foundation of our safety and security in the world! And the peaceful future of our children is not measured by money ....
    4. Vasilenko Vladimir
      Vasilenko Vladimir 7 November 2017 08: 45 New
      +5
      Quote: dik-nsk
      for what grandmother?

      FOR RUBLES, what bothers you ?!
      1. dik-nsk
        dik-nsk 7 November 2017 09: 04 New
        +5
        my friends are Petrosyans, and they compared with the revolutionary, and they remembered about rubles, well done))) it doesn’t bother that Putin abandoned the base in “fat” years because of the cost of maintaining it, and now, when all the belts are tightened, those "for rubles." no, I’m only in favor, but I don’t need to go to the place and no - adequate people hi we will not take out so many bases yet
        1. forester
          forester 7 November 2017 09: 23 New
          +4
          Quote: dik-nsk
          my friends are Petrosyans, and they compared with the revolutionary, and they remembered about rubles, well done))) it doesn’t bother that Putin abandoned the base in “fat” years because of the cost of maintaining it, and now, when all the belts are tightened, those "for rubles." no, I’m only in favor, but I don’t need to go to the place and no - adequate people hi we will not take out so many bases yet

          Then it was a gesture of goodwill, and the high cost of maintenance is just an explanation for domestic consumption - there was enough money, but there was hope for equal cooperation, now there are no illusions, it came to the conclusion that the closure of the base was a mistake but, time has passed and now these statements are like bargaining - politics, her mother ...
        2. Vasilenko Vladimir
          Vasilenko Vladimir 7 November 2017 09: 31 New
          +2
          Quote: dik-nsk
          Doesn’t bother that Putin abandoned the base in fat years because of the cost of maintaining it

          actually for a different reason
          By the way, the cost of the base for the Russian Federation was ridiculous 200 lyam per year, but 2002 is still far from greasy
        3. Grits
          Grits 7 November 2017 09: 36 New
          +2
          we will not take out so many bases yet
          You need to start small. For now, there will be enough base like the one that was in Lourdes - radio reconnaissance and other radars. It’s not very expensive, but in the next couple of years the ears will reconcile with its presence and calm down. And then you can do it filling.
          There is another question - did we ask the Cubans? Do they want aggravation again with the Americans and a new blockade?
    5. SPACE
      SPACE 7 November 2017 09: 04 New
      +1
      Quote: dik-nsk
      for what grandmother?

      For which, for which, for the oil and gas, American, they will buy a military base against America for bucks laughing
      Quote: dik-nsk
      oh, these Klintsevichs, the Federation Council is a bunch of talkers

      But Che, a normal move, it’s only “Good word ...”, more such kind words, to partners, let turnips what scratch? laughing
      Z.Y. "Where is my black gun" ...? wassat
    6. Stas Snezhin
      Stas Snezhin 7 November 2017 09: 42 New
      +3
      Quote: dik-nsk
      for what grandmother?

      It’s ostentatious for tinsel, and all sorts of Yeltsin centers, there is enough finance ..
    7. siberalt
      siberalt 7 November 2017 10: 02 New
      +3
      Maybe first we will restore free medicine and education, as in Cuba? recourse
      1. Cyrus
        Cyrus 8 November 2017 18: 35 New
        0
        We can’t recover without a lot of blood inside the country.
    8. Scoun
      Scoun 7 November 2017 10: 06 New
      +1
      Quote: dik-nsk
      for what grandmother? oh, these Klintsevichs, the Federation Council is a bunch of talkers

      ++ Klintskevich Cubans then asked?)))
    9. Vend
      Vend 7 November 2017 10: 08 New
      0
      If the Cubans do not mind, then why not restore. US will burst from concern laughing
    10. The comment was deleted.
    11. Seryoga Gord
      Seryoga Gord 8 November 2017 12: 46 New
      0
      yes all enti senators, yes the Duma thinkers are looking only for new reasons for cutting the budget dough, but with a fire and from the Sannikov Land ...))
  2. Landscaping
    Landscaping 7 November 2017 08: 30 New
    +6
    Perhaps a good idea, but the mattresses will be very against, then it is necessary to show the character and strength, they love it.
    1. Grandfather
      Grandfather 7 November 2017 08: 37 New
      +3
      Quote: Landscaper
      mattresses will be very against

      I think that, like last time, it works, maybe even one intention sober them up, they will start talking ...
  3. Uncle lee
    Uncle lee 7 November 2017 08: 30 New
    12
    How many of these crises we have experienced!
    And the base in Cuba is an interesting thing with a big hint!
    1. bouncyhunter
      bouncyhunter 7 November 2017 08: 36 New
      +4
      hi
      Quote: Uncle Lee
      And the base in Cuba is an interesting thing with a big hint!

      Very mattresses "rejoice." Yes, and in Vietnam, the base of the Navy will greatly “uplift” their mood. wink
      1. cniza
        cniza 7 November 2017 08: 47 New
        +5
        Greetings Pasha! hi , the base needs to be restored, modern means can significantly reduce the cost of its maintenance, and the surprise will be expensive.
        1. bouncyhunter
          bouncyhunter 7 November 2017 08: 51 New
          +8
          Hi Victor! hi In the case of the restoration of the base in Cuba, I forecast a sharp jump in the number of unmanned flights from the window shouting "Russians are coming!" . wassat
          1. cniza
            cniza 7 November 2017 08: 58 New
            +5
            This is at least, and many will not be able to get up from a chair. This would be a real breakthrough in our relations with the "partners". lol
            1. bouncyhunter
              bouncyhunter 7 November 2017 09: 06 New
              +6
              Quote: cniza
              This would be a real breakthrough in our relations with the "partners".

              That's for sure . It remains to hope and believe that the restoration of the bases will not be limited to big words, but will come true. soldier
              1. cniza
                cniza 7 November 2017 09: 14 New
                +2
                There is no other way, otherwise the "partners" will sit on their heads.
        2. Uncle lee
          Uncle lee 7 November 2017 09: 00 New
          +5
          Quote: cniza
          and the surprise will be expensive.

          "Your gift is not dear to me - your love is dear!" - Russian folk wisdom!
          hi I greet you !
          1. cniza
            cniza 7 November 2017 09: 04 New
            +4
            Greetings Vladimir! hi , and there will be love, it will certainly be, we can organize it, relations will immediately begin to improve.
            1. Uncle lee
              Uncle lee 7 November 2017 09: 12 New
              +6
              Quote: cniza
              relations will begin to improve.

              I will not remind you of a good word and a revolver, they themselves will guess that it is so effective! hi hi
      2. Svarog51
        Svarog51 7 November 2017 08: 55 New
        11
        Pasha, welcome hi Congratulations on the HOLIDAY. drinks
        I probably don’t understand everything, but this
        Such a move could lead to a new missile crisis,
        I am somehow discouraged. Why did this crisis end? In my opinion, it intensified, then subsided, but continued to one degree or another. So the restoration of our bases cannot cause a new crisis. IMHO.
        1. bouncyhunter
          bouncyhunter 7 November 2017 08: 57 New
          +5
          Hello Seryoga! hi drinks Mutually. drinks
          Quote: Svarog51
          Why did this crisis end?

          Mattresses think so. Remember how they rejoiced when they sawed them on the orders of labeled missiles. am
          1. Svarog51
            Svarog51 7 November 2017 09: 09 New
            10
            It’s good that they didn’t saw it all, something remained. Yes, and restoration work is going on.
        2. cniza
          cniza 7 November 2017 08: 59 New
          +3
          Greetings Sergey! Happy holiday! drinks , and our bases will be restored sooner or later.
          1. Svarog51
            Svarog51 7 November 2017 09: 07 New
            10
            Hi Victor hi Happy holiday drinks
            and our bases will be restored sooner or later.

            It's time, with the "partners" you need to speak their language. Still on these bases to deploy the installation of "ideological" weapons. This topic is "launched" now, but in vain.
            1. cniza
              cniza 7 November 2017 09: 10 New
              +2
              Yes, they, for these bases, will carry us on their hands and blow off dust particles. laughing
      3. Grits
        Grits 7 November 2017 09: 38 New
        +2
        Yes, and in Vietnam, the base of the Navy will greatly “lift” their mood
        Do not forget that she will also “cheer up” our current Chinese partners. There is no need to be with them now.
      4. siberalt
        siberalt 7 November 2017 12: 25 New
        +2
        But why in Vietnam are our bases if they are more buzzing with the Americans? lol The shelf was freed and there are other goods there.
        1. bouncyhunter
          bouncyhunter 7 November 2017 12: 27 New
          +1
          So the mattress will be a sort of blow to Faberge. wink
  4. Bare
    Bare 7 November 2017 08: 32 New
    +1
    Si vis pacem, para bellum "if you want peace - prepare for war"
  5. silberwolf88
    silberwolf88 7 November 2017 08: 32 New
    +4
    Military ... I would say the naval base in Cuba would be very, very much in the subject ...
    First of all, as a counterbalance to the overt aspirations of the United States ... sometimes a pistol pressed into the temple is very sobering ... the region is not easy ... the Panama Canal is nearby ... and the second channel that will be built by China through Nicaragua, too ... there are many different advantages ...
    There is one minus ... and where does Cuba go ... and with whom ... the question is perhaps naive, but after Fidel it does not have a definite answer ...
    1. Grandfather
      Grandfather 7 November 2017 08: 38 New
      +2
      Quote: silberwolf88
      Military ... I would say the naval base in Cuba would be very, very relevant.

      our "scientific" and "connections" ships, and so they won’t get out of there. wink
    2. your1970
      your1970 7 November 2017 09: 44 New
      +1
      Quote: silberwolf88
      I would say the naval base in Cuba would be very, very relevant ..
      - and which ship are you going to stick it in? We have them, apparently, like mud - ships? Not, of course, you must definitely place a couple of AUGs there - who argues ... NO ???? what what crying ....
      Okay, they would write about air defense and the air base - no, they immediately naval give ...
      1. silberwolf88
        silberwolf88 8 November 2017 11: 31 New
        0
        dear ... most of the functioning of the contingent occurs in peacetime ... the supply is carried out by sea ... hence the sea ... plus you can make repairs and supply of submarines ... I think this is quite enough for the interests of Russia and stabilization of relations with probable "allies" ...
        all the more so because there are projects for drilling (Cuba needs its own energy independence) of the Gulf of Mexico from Cuba ... and control of channels (Suez and being built by China through Nicaragua) ... you can serve a floating launch (spaceport) ... at the equator the launch is better and the angles of inclination of the orbit (there is more variability) ... you can still have many different profits ...
  6. anjey
    anjey 7 November 2017 08: 34 New
    +1
    Our base in Cuba - a naval and aviation complex - should be. This is the key.
    these words yes directly to God’s ears, with two hands for .....
  7. evil partisan
    evil partisan 7 November 2017 08: 36 New
    +4
    Those. Now American diplomats will be tormented not only by night voices from behind the embassy walls, but also nightmares in the form of a bear in a vestbelay
    1. cniza
      cniza 7 November 2017 08: 49 New
      +4
      Yeah, and a round dance of nesting dolls. laughing
  8. Observer2014
    Observer2014 7 November 2017 08: 46 New
    +2
    Bring a standard set to Cuba. PKR, Air Defense, For starters. And start horizontal drilling near Guantanamo in the interests of the Cuban national economy. With a hint of laying a nuclear charge. Let the base in Guantanamo turn into a hostage of certain circumstances. And let them scream about laying charges in the direction of the "free world"! laughing And at that moment, bring to Cuba at least “Poplar”, “Yars” and so on.
  9. Fan-fan
    Fan-fan 7 November 2017 08: 49 New
    +1
    First you need to declare only the defensive orientation of such a base, i.e. missile defense base. Just like they say at their base in Romania.
    It’s a pity that Putin brought our bases out of there, but they lived poor then, but we had to think ahead, since it will be much more difficult to return now. Here they write “for what kind of grandmothers” - they are mistaken, “grandmothers” can be found, a simple example, to allocate to theaters less, otherwise they just cheat and plunder state money - the ex-wife of Dzhigarkhanyan got rich in the theater incredibly, and the Gogol Center with Serebryannikov?
    Today it’s better to have less theaters, but more bases.
    1. Observer2014
      Observer2014 7 November 2017 08: 58 New
      +4
      Fan-fan
      You can find "grandmothers", a simple example, to allocate less to theaters, otherwise they simply chew and plunder state money - the ex-wife of Dzhigarkhanyan got rich in the theater incredibly, and the Gogol Center with Serebryannikov?
      Ha ha ha! laughing good Here it is a stone of prediction and a black hole in the Russian economy! Theaters! wassat laughing
    2. The comment was deleted.
  10. askort154
    askort154 7 November 2017 08: 55 New
    +4
    "The base was closed in 2002. Vladimir Vladimirovich decided that its maintenance is too expensive for Russia ..."

    Who blew his ears ?!
    At this time, Mr. Kudrin was the Minister of Finance! Is it expensive to feed your own? Then it will be much more expensive to feed strangers. Now, Cuba will not accept us. We betrayed them. In addition, today, as always - silently, quietly, without dust and noise, the Chinese come there. yes
  11. iliitchitch
    iliitchitch 7 November 2017 08: 55 New
    +4
    In Cuba, why base? Well, why the hell do we need a base in Cuba? What is there, besides the show-offs, you can tear in there to have a profit? Except that we will call the paduchoks for a short period of time; strategically we have nothing. This is with Vietnam.
    1. Grandfather
      Grandfather 7 November 2017 09: 05 New
      +3
      Quote: iliitch
      In Cuba, why base? Well, why the hell do we need a base in Cuba? What is there, besides the show-offs, you can tear in there to have a profit?

      banal "Caliber" with an incomprehensible warhead ... arrange?
      1. iliitchitch
        iliitchitch 7 November 2017 09: 19 New
        +2
        Quote: Dead Day
        banal "Caliber" with an incomprehensible warhead ... arrange?

        No, it will not work. The sticks themselves click their hooves, why fight with them for some reason. Sense to Cuba "Caliber" to drag, if from afar you can play out if necessary, and not "Caliber". No profit hi .
        1. Grandfather
          Grandfather 7 November 2017 09: 31 New
          +2
          Quote: iliitch
          . No profit

          and flying time, huh? winkYes, and the coverage area ...
          1. Setrac
            Setrac 7 November 2017 21: 36 New
            0
            Quote: Dead Day
            and flying time, huh? Yes, and the coverage area ...

            The caliber is a subsonic missile; the flying time must be reduced, not increased.
  12. rudolff
    rudolff 7 November 2017 08: 59 New
    +3
    There will be no bases either in Cuba or in Vietnam. Previously, Putin had to think when he closed these bases and when he forgave debts. Could use them for half a century. And now, even if they agree, which is unlikely, they will put up such an account, it will not seem enough. In the best case, PMTO. A couple of berths and a workshop.
    1. Grandfather
      Grandfather 7 November 2017 09: 07 New
      +2
      Quote: rudolff
      There will be no bases either in Cuba or in Vietnam. Previously, Putin had to think when he closed these bases and when he forgave debts

      you don’t need such pessimism, Floating, everything flows, everything changes wink
      1. rudolff
        rudolff 7 November 2017 10: 03 New
        +2
        Yes, gas flows through pipes, oil prices change ... And the rest, what? The same people in power as they were ten years ago were like twenty. Someone has been sitting since the 90s. Everything that they could change, they have already changed, and what is now, they are quite happy. This chatter about returning to Cuba, to Vietnam, has been excited every year for the last ten years. And what's the point? The most interesting thing is that both in Cuba and Vietnam it seems that they are not aware that we periodically "return" there.
        1. Grandfather
          Grandfather 7 November 2017 10: 05 New
          +1
          Quote: rudolff
          The same people in power as they were ten years ago were like twenty. Someone has been sitting since the 90s. Everything that they could change, they have already changed, and what is now, they are quite happy.

          can not argue... recourse
  13. Krasnyiy komissar
    Krasnyiy komissar 7 November 2017 09: 06 New
    +1
    Cuba, of course, will accept us, but it will require us to take ourselves for maintenance. Then it was justified, because the USSR had very few ICBMs, and there were hundreds of ballistic missiles. Now Russia has over 500 ICBMs of all types and hundreds of strategic airborne missile defense systems. I think the best option is to withdraw from strategic offensive arms and start launching the Courier ICBMs and orbital ICBMs.
  14. Million
    Million 7 November 2017 09: 15 New
    0
    Putin is unlikely to agree to this
  15. Mestny
    Mestny 7 November 2017 09: 23 New
    +2
    Quote: ID90
    Putin didn’t close it for this, so that he would suddenly open it.
    The Syrians proposed to turn Tartus 15 years ago into a full-fledged base, even carried out surveys and the project was.

    This is the art of management - to be able to respond to changing conditions. The Putin who was closing is not quite the one who is opening now. The situation has changed.
    This is just a stubborn obstinacy that he is a bad leader and he doesn’t have to “leave” - everything that he does is bad.
  16. weksha50
    weksha50 7 November 2017 09: 25 New
    +4
    Here ... how many empty conversations in the Duma can be?
    The first is whether Cuba will let itself in. Fidel really isn’t, and Raul is far from Fidel ... Their views on the same things were sometimes different even during Fidel’s life, but he walked in Fidel’s bed (in the wake), avoiding loud differences ...
    The second - with Vietnam, a practically similar situation ...
    Third - where is the money at the base, Zin? Ugh .... Franz?
  17. Viktor.12.71
    Viktor.12.71 7 November 2017 09: 26 New
    +3
    Why do we need a base in Cuba if any submarine missile carrier can cover the territory of the United States without leaving the port? Now is not the 62nd year, now it is enough to withdraw from the RSDM agreement.
    1. Grandfather
      Grandfather 7 November 2017 09: 29 New
      +2
      Quote: Viktor.12.71
      Why do we need a base in Cuba if any submarine missile carrier can cover the territory of the United States without leaving the port?

      why do the states around us have a base? they also have nuclear submarines, and more than ours.
      1. your1970
        your1970 7 November 2017 09: 52 New
        +2
        and then that the bulk of the big US cities are located along the coast - and we are far enough away. The break to the US coast of our nuclear submarines is already the northern fox of the USA, but the break to our coast of their nuclear submarines is much more ambiguous. I will not be surprised at the presence, for example, of an underwater nuclear defense line somewhere at a decent distance from our borders. Yes, even commonplace guided minefields can decently THEM high kick off

        That is why they are like stung and drag their bases to our border ...
        1. Solomon Kane
          Solomon Kane 7 November 2017 10: 13 New
          +8
          Golden words, dear! Moreover, deploying strategic weapons and means of covering them on one spot (Cuba) is not effective enough; hitting only one missile with a YaB will reduce all efforts to 0 ....
          Much "nicer" underwater autonomous modules in the coastal strip .....
      2. Viktor.12.71
        Viktor.12.71 7 November 2017 10: 13 New
        0
        Quote: Dead Day
        why do the states around us have a base? they also have nuclear submarines, and more than ours.

        These are mainly missile defense bases, and the more they are deployed, the less likely Russia is to launch a nuclear strike against the United States in case of something.
        1. Grandfather
          Grandfather 7 November 2017 10: 35 New
          0
          Quote: Viktor.12.71
          Quote: Dead Day
          why do the states around us have a base? they also have nuclear submarines, and more than ours.

          These are mainly missile defense bases, and the more they are deployed, the less likely Russia is to launch a nuclear strike against the United States in case of something.

          What am I talking about? an extra base outside Russia will not hurt. although container ships are also an option.
  18. ROM1077
    ROM1077 7 November 2017 09: 29 New
    +1
    It is high time. under the guise of protecting the US coast from the Korean threat to bring ships with ss 400 calibers in there to put on let mattresses get nervous
  19. SCHWERIN
    SCHWERIN 7 November 2017 09: 49 New
    +2
    Did you ask Cuba?
  20. Tarasios
    Tarasios 7 November 2017 09: 53 New
    +1
    Americans proceed from the logic that "they are far away," and therefore they are impudent beyond measure, reveling in impunity. Especially in recent years. Therefore, the Russian military base near them would be a good splinter and a strong reminder that "it is not so simple." And those who are afraid of "increasing tension" would like to note that the constant avoidance of battle is far from the best strategy. Often, a clear willingness to give a good change stops the attacker ...
  21. win9090
    win9090 7 November 2017 09: 55 New
    +1
    Ha who else would give it to do there))
    Now is not 1962
    1. Grandfather
      Grandfather 7 November 2017 10: 07 New
      0
      Quote: win9090
      Now is not 1962

      it’s much worse now.
  22. Wolka
    Wolka 7 November 2017 10: 15 New
    0
    but expensive, expensive, very expensive ...
  23. loginovich
    loginovich 7 November 2017 10: 16 New
    +3
    And they didn’t forget to ask the younger Castro. It will be remembered some time ago Castro had already sent.
  24. Tektor
    Tektor 7 November 2017 10: 40 New
    0
    Naturally, it can only be a defense base. About the missile defense base. yes
  25. Livonetc
    Livonetc 7 November 2017 10: 54 New
    0
    Quote: dik-nsk
    for what grandmother? oh, these Klintsevichs, the Federation Council is a bunch of talkers

    For the Russian knowledge.
  26. Egorovich
    Egorovich 7 November 2017 11: 05 New
    +5
    The Russian military base in Cuba is a very good whip for mattresses. And she will be there. There are a lot of incentives for Cubans. Both material and technical.
  27. Bronevick
    Bronevick 7 November 2017 12: 29 New
    +1
    In Lourdes, even there is no need to restore anything, everything is very well preserved there.
  28. warrior1979
    warrior1979 7 November 2017 14: 00 New
    0
    Quote: Bronevick
    In Lourdes, even there is no need to restore anything, everything is very well preserved there.

    Only replace the equipment and everything ... will work again!
  29. rudolff
    rudolff 7 November 2017 14: 18 New
    +2
    MOSCOW, July 17, 2014— RIA Novosti. Russian President Vladimir Putin has not confirmed that Russia and Cuba have agreed to resume the operation of the radar center in Lourdes.
    “No, that’s not true,” Putin answered the question about the resumption of the station in Lourdes.
    "There is nothing miserable, we are able to solve the problems in the field of defense capability without this component, there is nothing unusual here, we have closed the work of this center by agreement with our friends, we have no plans to resume work," said the President of the Russian Federation.
    Now there is the Havana University of Information Technology. But the Chinese have placed in Cuba their cent of radio interception. A holy place is never empty.
  30. misti1973
    misti1973 7 November 2017 15: 00 New
    0
    Yes, it's time for this Klintsevich to rest! Marazmatik. And he said this for a long time, there is no reason to pass it off as news. Propaganda must die!
  31. Nemesis
    Nemesis 7 November 2017 18: 17 New
    +1
    Military bases abroad are expensive and there are no guarantees that Russia will not be asked to leave them. It is enough to have an agreement on the free entry into the ports of Cuba of any warships of the Russian Federation ... But it is better to direct the money to the construction of new military railway missile systems, including cruise missiles
  32. free
    free 7 November 2017 18: 37 New
    0
    Walk a horse a century of will not to be seen (build a base in Cuba Vladimir Vladimirovich).
  33. Former battalion commander
    Former battalion commander 7 November 2017 18: 48 New
    +1
    It turns out who pros.ral base in Cuba and Vietnam! Yes, for just one thing it would be suspended for Faberge ... if he had these Faberge strong enough, and that omelet would break off immediately ...
  34. Lexa-149
    Lexa-149 8 November 2017 16: 48 New
    0
    Restore the base and answer all US questions that we are so protected from Iran’s nuclear missile threat!
  35. 16112014nk
    16112014nk 12 November 2017 15: 57 New
    0
    In any MO of any country there are hawks and pigeons. So with us, Our "hawks" would like to have a base in Cuba. But...
    "I have a desire to buy a house, but I do not have the opportunity" .... ©