Military Review

An-148 had to plant ahead of schedule, interrupting testing in Voronezh

66
It became known that the test flight of the An-148 aircraft made in Voronezh ended in failure. Information Agency Interfax-AVN cites a message stating that the crew had to land the plane ahead of schedule. The reason for the emergency landing was the failure of one of the An-148 engines during the flight, which was reported to the agency by the press service of the Voronezh Aircraft Manufacturing Society (VASO) (included in the UAC).


During the test flight on board the aircraft were five crew members.



From the report:
Landing occurred in normal mode. No harm done.


After the failure of one of the aircraft engines, a special commission is created to ascertain all the circumstances of the incident.

For reference: the aircraft An-148 VASO produced by order of the main defense department of the country. This is a short-haul narrow-body passenger aircraft, designed to carry passengers to 80. Limit distance for flight - 4,4 thousand. Km. The aircraft was developed by the Antonov ASTC (Ukraine). The first flight was made in 2004 year.
Photos used:
http://www.vaso.ru
66 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Grandfather
    Grandfather 6 November 2017 15: 31
    14
    It became known that the test flight of the An-148 aircraft produced in Voronezh ended failure.
    here are the journals ... fool the plane landed, normal. what a failure? new plane, your sores. will bring.
    1. maxim947
      maxim947 6 November 2017 15: 33
      23
      This is not a sore, serial engines, moreover, the past Head. tests, etc., this should not be close, this is a serious refusal, it’s good that they got off like that.
      1. Cook
        Cook 6 November 2017 15: 41
        +7
        And what immediately blame the engine? The car was just assembled, it could easily be pulled up during assembly or installation, and acceptance tests exist.
        1. stas
          stas 6 November 2017 16: 31
          +3
          Perhaps this is a scheduled flight with the development of landing on one engine.
          1. GIN
            GIN 6 November 2017 16: 41
            +2
            Kanechno test brainless landing))))))
            1. stas
              stas 6 November 2017 16: 44
              +4
              It's you about your brains toАnot at all.
      2. Aaron Zawi
        Aaron Zawi 6 November 2017 15: 57
        18
        Quote: maxim947
        This is not a sore, serial engines, moreover, the past Head. tests, etc., this should not be close, this is a serious refusal, it’s good that they got off like that.

        Well hello. Beat serial cars which on 10-15 in the air. So nothing extraordinary happened. The crew worked perfectly.
        1. maxim947
          maxim947 6 November 2017 17: 15
          +6
          Nothing extraordinary is when the light bulb burns out, but here is a serious failure. And you do not need to give examples with 10 year sides, there are other reasons, taking into account operation and maintenance. I'm not saying that everything was lost, but the case is extremely not good
          1. drunkram
            drunkram 6 November 2017 20: 17
            0
            Motor Sichevites carried simply defective engine sent (just kidding)
      3. tomket
        tomket 6 November 2017 16: 05
        +3
        Quote: maxim947
        this is a serious refusal, it’s good that they got off like that.

        I remember one already crashed during such a flight here.
        1. verner1967
          verner1967 6 November 2017 21: 07
          0
          Quote: tomket
          I remember one already crashed during such a flight here.

          crashed, but there were slightly different circumstances
      4. Ustin
        Ustin 6 November 2017 16: 12
        +7
        This is an incident, and not so rare. In test flights, it is even recorded in one of the required profiles (checks). Yes, and the motors, despite the fact that they have been tested, are tested during the flight process. Oddly enough this sounds, but at the stages of testing this phenomenon is not uncommon. So more emotions in the pursuit of sensation.
      5. Normal ok
        Normal ok 6 November 2017 18: 00
        +1
        Quote: maxim947
        This is not a sore, serial engines, moreover, the past Head. tests, etc., this should not be close, this is a serious refusal, it’s good that they got off like that.

        Import substitution however.
        1. drunkram
          drunkram 6 November 2017 20: 18
          +1
          I mean, there D-436 engines from Motorsichev’s are from those times the code they were delivered regularly piece by piece from Ukraine
      6. not main
        not main 6 November 2017 23: 23
        +1
        Quote: maxim947
        This is not a sore, serial engines, moreover, the past Head. tests, etc., this should not be close, this is a serious refusal, it’s good that they got off like that.

        What's the problem? Doesn’t this happen in production cars? In principle, this situation is described in detail in the RLE! Yes, there is a lot written! I advise you to read, that would not bear heresy!
        1. The comment was deleted.
          1. The comment was deleted.
            1. maxim947
              maxim947 7 November 2017 22: 02
              0
              What of the fact that this situation is described in the RLE? Or I’ll say in another way - even if it had not been described there. The fact that this is far from an ordinary situation, someone greatly messed up and nothing more. And about the spraying of saliva - it is advisable first of all to monitor your tongue I advise you to read, that would not bear heresy![i] [/ i]
              1. not main
                not main 7 November 2017 22: 25
                +2
                Quote: maxim947
                What of the fact that this situation is described in the RLE? Or I’ll say in another way - even if it had not been described there. The fact that this is far from an ordinary situation, someone greatly messed up and nothing more. And about the spraying of saliva - it is advisable first of all to monitor your tongue I advise you to read, that would not bear heresy![i] [/ i]

                Well, that's reasoned! I’ll say that I basically agree, for the rest, I don’t see the point of spreading a polemic! Thank you for criticism! Indeed, logs are not visible in one’s eye.
                1. maxim947
                  maxim947 7 November 2017 22: 44
                  +1
                  That's agreed)
    2. Alex_Rarog
      Alex_Rarog 6 November 2017 15: 36
      +3
      Well, at least the crew was not injured.
      1. 210ox
        210ox 6 November 2017 15: 50
        +4
        It happens. This is aviation. There they will figure it out. Most importantly, people are alive.
        Quote: Alex_Rarog
        Well, at least the crew was not injured.
    3. Volodin
      Volodin 6 November 2017 15: 58
      +7
      Quote: Dead Day
      what bad luck? new the plane, its sores. will bring.


      Hrenas new ... It is written: An-148 with 2004, the fly. Or, according to your logic, every liner leaving the factory needs to be further “brought” separately, and even considered “great luck” if only one engine failed in its flight?
    4. forester
      forester 6 November 2017 16: 07
      +4
      Quote: Dead Day
      It became known that the test flight of the An-148 aircraft produced in Voronezh ended failure.
      here are the journals ... fool the plane landed, normal. what a failure? new plane, your sores. will bring.

      Yes, it’s not at all new - for more than 10 years, only one Angara airline has been flying it at the moment, others have refused - the aircraft is not reliable
      1. DenZ
        DenZ 6 November 2017 16: 19
        0
        Quote: forester
        Yes, it’s not at all new - for more than 10 years, only one Angara airline has been flying it at the moment, others have refused - the aircraft is not reliable

        Rossiya Airlines has 6 An-148-100B aircraft in its fleet (it’s in the photo for the article). Information taken from the airline’s website.
        1. Cook
          Cook 6 November 2017 18: 24
          +4
          The airline "Russia" this type of aircraft for a couple of years, as it does not operate. Partially, the planes were handed over to the Saratov Airlines.
    5. Scoun
      Scoun 6 November 2017 16: 07
      +4
      Quote: Dead Day
      here is the journalism ... the plane landed, norms. what a failure? new plane, your sores. will bring.

      Yeah, now they’ll run up and finish .... For 30 years they couldn’t and now they will.
      Quote: maxim947
      This is not a sore, serial engines, moreover, the past Head. tests, etc., this should not be close, this is a serious refusal, it’s good that they got off like that.

      + and then got the non-analog crackers
      That is why, if there are problems, they are afraid to discuss them?
      PS.
      If you look at the number of accidents on the number of aircraft, then the safest ones are Airbasy.
      1. IL-18
        IL-18 6 November 2017 17: 04
        +2
        And their engines are American or French-American
    6. Piramidon
      Piramidon 6 November 2017 17: 52
      +5
      Quote: Dead Day
      here is the journalism ... the plane landed, norms. what a failure? new plane, your sores. will bring.

      Here are the commentators. The plane has an engine failure, the test flight is interrupted - is this, in your opinion, luck? The luck is that no one was hurt.
      1. Gml
        Gml 6 November 2017 20: 58
        +3
        The luck is that no one was hurt.
        And this is not luck, but the skill of the crew.
    7. Young_Communist
      Young_Communist 6 November 2017 19: 04
      +1
      here's the journalism ... fool the plane landed, norms. what a failure? new plane, your sores. will bring.

      This means that the F-35 sores will be brought up, because not one of them has crashed either. Or do bp * owls have more soulless, incorrigible sores?
    8. Nikolai Grek
      Nikolai Grek 6 November 2017 21: 22
      +9
      10 of September 2017 of the year An-148 aircraft flight 6В-5837 Saratov Airlines on the route Kirov-Simferopol made an emergency landing. In 4: 15, 10 minutes after departure from Pobedilovo (Kirov), the right engine failed in the plane due to a drop in oil pressure. In 6: 15 the aircraft made an emergency landing at the airport of the city of Saratov. It is known that there were 72 passengers and four crew members on board the aircraft.

      1 October 2017 year, while taking off the flight of the airline "Angara" Talakan-Irkutsk, the right engine caught fire. The aircraft made an emergency landing at the port of departure.

      too many failures !!! negative negative negative
      and finally you need to send Khokhlyat development to the landfill and take on your own !!! good good good
    9. pilot306
      pilot306 7 November 2017 09: 04
      +4
      Do not be dumb! I did not complete the test flight program. There was a failure. Definitely a test flight ended in failure. Or do you need corpses and a wrecked car, so that the flight was considered unsuccessful?
  2. bouncyhunter
    bouncyhunter 6 November 2017 15: 32
    10
    Landing occurred in normal mode. No harm done.

    It’s good that everyone is safe.
  3. g1v2
    g1v2 6 November 2017 15: 37
    13
    If my sclerosis does not fail me, then there are D-436 engines, which are produced in Ukraine. Well, the modern culture of manufacturing and assembly there perfectly shows. Just like at one time the burned-out engine on Gorshkov during the tests, made in Ukraine and only recently repaired for installation on Kasatonova. It seems "Made in Ukraine" is becoming a brand of anti-quality. request
    1. svp67
      svp67 6 November 2017 15: 46
      +2
      Quote: g1v2
      If my sclerosis does not fail me, then there are D-436 engines, which are produced in Ukraine. Well, the modern culture of manufacturing and assembly there perfectly shows.

      And your memory doesn’t tell you that in Ukraine it is forbidden by law to supply something for our MO ... That is, these engines either came to us before 2014 or ... these are “Belarusian” engines.
      1. g1v2
        g1v2 6 November 2017 15: 51
        +8
        Well, this does not change the country of manufacture. request Moreover, Ukraine still supplies engines for helicopters to us regularly and much more, despite all the formidable prohibitions. Now the issue of servicing an124 is being solved. The only thing that actually turned out to be the problem is the gas turbine engine for frigates. And there most likely it depended on a position of nikolayevets. There Cossacks found a way to get around the ban, and nikolayevets did not. Well, the natural result - now stove stoves are riveted. hi
        1. svp67
          svp67 6 November 2017 15: 56
          +3
          Quote: g1v2
          Now they’re solving the issue of servicing the AN124

          In response to our same decision on IL-76 ... hi
        2. DenZ
          DenZ 6 November 2017 16: 22
          0
          Quote: g1v2
          Moreover, Ukraine still supplies engines for helicopters to us regularly and much more, despite all the formidable bans

          What about the engines of Zaporizhzhya can be more detailed? With links to sources of information. It painfully sounds like an irresponsible statement.
          1. APASUS
            APASUS 6 November 2017 17: 07
            +4
            Quote: DenZ
            What about the engines of Zaporizhzhya can be more detailed? With links to sources of information. It painfully sounds like an irresponsible statement.

            Where have you been, dear?
            Despite the difficult situation in Ukraine, aircraft engines in Russia and Ukraine continue planned cooperative deliveries to enterprises of the two countries. Ukraine supplies aircraft engines for civilian helicopters and for military helicopters, which are manufactured through the export line. This was announced to Interfax-AVN by the president of the Union of Aircraft Engine Building Association Viktor Chuyko.
            “So far, all the forgings, stampings, aircraft engine units within the framework of cooperative deliveries in the normal mode have been delivered from Russia to Ukraine and from Ukraine to Russia. The financial settlement system also functions normally,” Chuiko said.
            He also added that according to the decree of the President of Ukraine Petro Poroshenko, military products are not supplied to Russia, but the decree clarifies that this applies only to supplies for the Russian Defense Ministry.

            I think the sources you yourself can find and the fact that Russia is one of the three main trading partners of Ukraine so far
            1. DenZ
              DenZ 6 November 2017 18: 28
              0
              It is clear that I somehow missed about the engines delivered for our civilian helicopters for export. But even more so, I can’t understand why we shouldn’t put our engines on our civilian helicopters and send them for export. It seems like we have already made a replacement for the Motorsichev engines, or not?
              1. g1v2
                g1v2 6 November 2017 20: 37
                +3
                The reason is simple. We need too many of these engines. Its production in such volumes will not be released soon. So far, it is enough only for military orders and it is not a fact that Zaporizhzhya engines without a pale do not go there. And the citizen is mainly Zaporozhye. Import substituting such things is not to make one engine and show on TV. We need several hundred engines a year. This is work for years. Naturally, there will be more and more of us every year, but we will continue to purchase several years. request
          2. Orionvit
            Orionvit 6 November 2017 19: 45
            +5
            Quote: DenZ
            What about the engines of Zaporizhzhya can be more detailed? With links to sources of information. It painfully sounds like an irresponsible statement.

            To begin with, the D-436 engine is available for a long time, it has been debugged in all positions and the probability of its failure is very small. But there is one more thing but. After the Maidan, with "Motor Sich", due to the decline in production, a sharp reduction in salaries (at times), many specialists left. Therefore, production culture and quality have naturally fallen. And about the regular deliveries of helicopter engines manufactured by Motor Sich to Russia, it’s true. The engine is assembled, tested, then the fuel equipment is removed (it is still produced in Russia), and in this form (without fuel equipment, officially and according to the documents, this is considered not an engine, but a spare part), sent to the customer. And already in Russia, somewhere at a repair shop or at a factory in Gatchina, they put their missing units on the engine, re-test, carry out all the necessary adjustments, and please put on any helicopter.
            1. drunkram
              drunkram 6 November 2017 20: 24
              +2
              These engines were delivered before 2014, as evidenced by the recent news that Ukraine will not supply engines for VASO according to An-148 since they go for the RF Ministry of Defense and therefore we will not get one plane this year and two next, and there they will already decide what and how will be with the engines. Perhaps the Salutovites will be able to build, only 6 engines are needed.
            2. Piramidon
              Piramidon 7 November 2017 13: 49
              +1
              Quote: Orionvit
              To begin with, the D-436 engine is available for a long time, it has been debugged in all positions and the probability of its failure is very small.

              Failure to denial of strife. Systems that ensure engine operation can also fail. In the end, the crew could turn off the engine itself when signs of an emergency occurred. For example, the operation (even false) of the alarm "Chip in oil".
              1. Orionvit
                Orionvit 7 November 2017 14: 11
                +2
                Quote: Piramidon
                For example, the operation (even false) of the alarm "Shavings in oil"

                I agree, everything can be. I’ll say as a specialist who has worked with aircraft engines for 20 years. Well, if the false response is "Chips in the engine", and if not, then if a similar incident happened on a new engine, this is a big scandal.
    2. Nikolai Grek
      Nikolai Grek 6 November 2017 21: 31
      +4
      Quote: g1v2
      If my sclerosis does not fail me, then there are D-436 engines, which are produced in Ukraine. Well, the modern culture of manufacturing and assembly there perfectly shows. Just like at one time the burned-out engine on Gorshkov during the tests, made in Ukraine and only recently repaired for installation on Kasatonova. It seems "Made in Ukraine" is becoming a brand of anti-quality. request

      this is not the whole list of incidents !!!
  4. exo
    exo 6 November 2017 15: 39
    +3
    Quote: Dead Day
    It became known that the test flight of the An-148 aircraft produced in Voronezh ended failure.
    here are the journals ... fool the plane landed, normal. what a failure? new plane, your sores. will bring.

    The plane is almost 10 years old. Where is he new? Small-batch is, for sure. The engines on it, to put it mildly, are far from perfect. Like so much more. Recently, with another An-148, there was an incident with the engine.
    1. Grandfather
      Grandfather 6 November 2017 15: 44
      +1
      Quote: exo
      The plane is almost 10 years old. Where is he new?

      and what, the "old" flew?
    2. Cook
      Cook 6 November 2017 15: 52
      +2
      But what are these engines in fact far from perfect? The fact that the same ones, for example, are on the Be-200, doesn’t it bother?
  5. Reserve buildbat
    Reserve buildbat 6 November 2017 15: 46
    +3
    "The landing occurred as normal. No one was hurt."
    It remains only to congratulate the pilots.
  6. Herculesic
    Herculesic 6 November 2017 15: 52
    0
    Now you need to find the cause, not the switchman, and continue the tests.
  7. assa67
    assa67 6 November 2017 15: 56
    +3
    tests of a stolen airplane in Voronezh ... aah ... the engines were obviously in the early 2000s .... well, remember how our prisoners of war in WWII assembled engines for Messers, metal chips were added to the oil ... while the Nazis sorted out, a few dozen flew to the front ... maybe here .... it's not paranoia, this service was
  8. exo
    exo 6 November 2017 15: 59
    0
    Quote: Dead Day
    Quote: exo
    The plane is almost 10 years old. Where is he new?

    and what, the "old" flew?

    Specifically, this aircraft is new. But the engines may be after repair. In connection with our "fraternal relations" with Ukraine.
  9. exo
    exo 6 November 2017 16: 24
    +1
    Quote: Cook
    But what are these engines in fact far from perfect? The fact that the same ones, for example, are on the Be-200, doesn’t it bother?

    According to the Be-200, I have not seen statistics. I will not say anything. But I saw six ANAMs. I can’t publish it. Due to "trade secrets." Planes only fly in Saratov, but they do not belong;)
    1. Cook
      Cook 6 November 2017 16: 35
      +3
      Yes, I know all these statistics, I study under the signature at work. According to available information about this engine, I did not see signs of any critical flaws. And if you are related to aviation, you should know that only one fifth of aviation accidents occur on equipment. The remaining miracles, unfortunately, are predominantly man-made.
      1. IL-18
        IL-18 6 November 2017 17: 27
        +2
        A version of the An-148 with the SM-406 was under consideration. In this situation with Ukraine, it makes sense to consider again. The bulk of the boards are used by the Ministry of Defense and the Ministry of Emergencies;
  10. Machete
    Machete 6 November 2017 16: 41
    0
    Normal situation. Aircraft for this and so long chased to detect ALL the malfunctions. Why yell?
    1. Cook
      Cook 6 November 2017 17: 54
      +4
      Yes, in general, the situation with publicity through the media, various kinds of minor incidents, such as: cracking windshields, destroying pneumatic wheels, birds getting in, airplanes getting into the air is pretty strange. Why raise unnecessary excitement, because of actually ordinary events in the operation? Only people are frightened in vain. Engine failure, too, is not directly out of the ordinary, an emerging event. And even when performing a test flight after the manufacture of the aircraft, where the crew are testers and there is no commercial load, all the more. All aircraft with a type certificate have been tested for compliance with the requirement to maintain a safe climb gradient when the engine fails to take off with a maximum take-off weight in all weather conditions. Well, about horizontal flight or landing, and there is nothing to say.
  11. Protos
    Protos 6 November 2017 18: 58
    +1
    Quote: DenZ
    Quote: g1v2
    Moreover, Ukraine still supplies engines for helicopters to us regularly and much more, despite all the formidable bans

    What about the engines of Zaporizhzhya can be more detailed? With links to sources of information. It painfully sounds like an irresponsible statement.

    And the keys to the hut hte dengy are lol
  12. exo
    exo 6 November 2017 19: 06
    0
    Quote: Cook
    Yes, I know all these statistics, I study under the signature at work. According to available information about this engine, I did not see signs of any critical flaws. And if you are related to aviation, you should know that only one fifth of aviation accidents occur on equipment. The remaining miracles, unfortunately, are predominantly man-made.

    As for man-madeness, I agree. But it was on this engine (I mean those that are on the An-148) that structural and manufacturing defects began to creep out. I hope they were defeated. I won’t tell you exactly.
    1. Cook
      Cook 6 November 2017 20: 20
      0
      I can say that design changes (replacing the gears of the central drive) have been made, and at least recently, I rarely hear about failures d436. Well, on self-shutdown after applying the reverse, also some kind of events were held.
  13. exo
    exo 6 November 2017 19: 07
    0
    Quote: IL-18
    A version of the An-148 with the SM-406 was under consideration. In this situation with Ukraine, it makes sense to consider again. The bulk of the boards are used by the Ministry of Defense and the Ministry of Emergencies;

    Unfortunately, given the French part of this engine, this is unlikely to go.
  14. Friedrichmeine
    Friedrichmeine 6 November 2017 22: 18
    0
    Isn’t it easier to just buy normal airplanes in countries that do it well?
  15. axiles100682
    axiles100682 6 November 2017 23: 09
    0
    Quote: Young_Communist
    here's the journalism ... fool the plane landed, norms. what a failure? new plane, your sores. will bring.

    This means that the F-35 sores will be brought up, because not one of them has crashed either. Or do bp * owls have more soulless, incorrigible sores?

    Offset! Licked the owner. How is it with the Bulgarian aircraft industry?
  16. exo
    exo 7 November 2017 13: 46
    0
    Quote: FriedrichMeine
    Isn’t it easier to just buy normal airplanes in countries that do it well?

    Under normal international conditions: yes, it would be better. And from the commercial side, too. But, from the point of view of the country's defense capability (and civil aviation is a strategic mobilization reserve), we need to develop our own. Now, they will impose sanctions on aircraft leasing, the country will be left without wings, at least five years. And already, how many conditions are being set now, when operating leased aircraft (when buying spare parts), it is better not to say.
  17. Not served
    Not served 8 November 2017 14: 04
    0
    Quote: Cook
    The airline "Russia" this type of aircraft for a couple of years, as it does not operate. Partially, the planes were handed over to the Saratov Airlines.

    Yes, two sides are flying. I saw it myself. The truth did not fly. With whom he spoke, the company praises the plane, makes it reliable and cheap to maintain.
  18. exo
    exo 10 November 2017 12: 00
    0
    Quote: Not served
    Quote: Cook
    The airline "Russia" this type of aircraft for a couple of years, as it does not operate. Partially, the planes were handed over to the Saratov Airlines.

    Yes, two sides are flying. I saw it myself. The truth did not fly. With whom he spoke, the company praises the plane, makes it reliable and cheap to maintain.

    Boards airline "Russia", fly in a different coloring, in Saratov. All six cars. And before that, they were a couple of years on the joke. Maybe friends saw the sides of the special squad? The color corresponds to the old color of the a / c Russia. Interestingly, with whom did you speak? Passengers are quite possible. Inside, the plane is not bad. Especially, before they reconfigured the cabin. I managed to fly away. This plane can be praised even by the former ITP, who worked for them and then, until the transition to Western liners. But after that, the boast abruptly leaves. Everything is relative.