The Russian Federation submitted to the UN its draft resolution on the investigation of himatak in Syria

26
Russia submitted to the UN Security Council its draft resolution on the extension of the mandate of the mission to investigate chemical attacks in Syria, reports RIA News message from a diplomatic source.

The Russian Federation submitted to the UN its draft resolution on the investigation of himatak in Syria


According to a source, Moscow offered to send experts to Khan-Sheikhun "to conduct a full-scale investigation using all possible methods of an incident involving chemical weapons 4 April. Another group of experts should conduct an investigation at Shairat airbase and “collect samples to verify allegations that the sarin used in Khan-Sheikhun was stored at the airbase”.

That is, the specialists of the special monitoring mission (IDA) must "collect and analyze additional information and evidence that has not been obtained or prepared by the fact-finding mission."

The Americans have prepared their draft resolution.

The document proposes to extend the work of experts on 2 of the year. The draft states that "none of the parties in Syria should use, develop, produce, and in other ways acquire and store chemical weapons." It is emphasized that "the Syrian Arab Republic should not use, develop, produce, and in other ways acquire and store chemical weapons."

Recall the CID mandate expires on November 17. The US October 24 has already voted on a draft resolution to extend the mandate of the mission, but Russia has blocked the document.
  • http://www.globallookpress.com
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

26 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +4
    3 November 2017 08: 39
    Diplomacy .. Mother of her .. I have to communicate with the deaf-deaf-mute.
    1. +5
      3 November 2017 08: 43
      It seems that they are deaf, blind and dumb. They have a goal and here all means are used (very dirty). Just bend your line.
      1. +1
        3 November 2017 08: 49
        It is clear that there is a line, they just completely ignore our proposals ..
        Quote: BerBer
        It seems that they are deaf, blind and dumb. They have a goal and here all means are used (very dirty). Just bend your line.
        1. +12
          3 November 2017 09: 00
          Quote: 210ox
          ignore our suggestions ..

          This is not ignore, but sabotage!
          Dmitriy hi
      2. +4
        3 November 2017 09: 03
        Quote: BerBer
        Just bend your line.

        All is correct. Their goal is to cram as many organizations and specially trained missions as possible, even though the mission is to control the use of handkerchiefs, but their own non-profit ... Drive them all from there along with the owners. If they are given slack, they will, through their UN, extend a mandate to permit the use, in the territory of Syria, XO exclusively by the Igilovites ... angry
      3. +4
        3 November 2017 09: 27
        Correct - it seems to them that everyone around is stupid, and blindly deaf.
        1. +1
          3 November 2017 15: 45
          The same is true.
    2. 0
      3 November 2017 08: 44
      Quote: 210ox
      Diplomacy .. Mother of her .. I have to communicate with the deaf-deaf-mute.

      These are the rules of the game. Well, now we are waiting for a veto from the USA and lackeys.
    3. +6
      3 November 2017 08: 45
      Russia submitted to the UN Security Council its draft resolution on the extension of the mandate of the mission to investigate chemical attacks in Syria

      The Americans have prepared their draft resolution.

      Started to measure draft resolutions? So, there will be mutual locks. And the mandate expires on November 17th. Who benefits?
      1. +8
        3 November 2017 08: 49
        Ours will block the resolution of ASP, they will block ours .. And China will sit on a branch and watch crocodiles butt. For in both cases it will abstain. Here and all diplomacy, in its modern sense.
        1. +7
          3 November 2017 08: 52
          hi It is clear that the Bodalovo will begin. The whole intrigue here is who benefits from delaying the adoption of a resolution to extend the mandate? wink
          1. +6
            3 November 2017 09: 01
            I don’t know why, but it seems that the ASP is more profitable. If it turns out that the armament was used by ardent barmalei (which I don’t doubt for a second), and what’s even more unpleasant is it turns out that the barmalei used moderate, then the situation will be very unpleasant for the ASP . Of course, I understand that Fashington has long been putting a large bolt with a left thread on international opinion. But the unpleasant sediment for their "allies" will remain. IMHO. soldier
            1. +7
              3 November 2017 09: 05
              Here I am of the same opinion. The United States already has a fake report on hand that suits them. And all sorts of "independent" experts can ruin their raspberries. Therefore, in their draft resolution, chemical weapons are tightly tied to the ATS. Yes
          2. +10
            3 November 2017 09: 03
            Max hi
            It is beneficial for us to confirm the absence of chemical weapons, the Yankees, on the contrary ... In general, they are not needed there! Essentially ...
            1. +6
              3 November 2017 09: 08
              Sasha hi That is why the United States will in every way block any resolutions other than its own. I wrote above:
              Quote: Jedi
              The United States already has a fake report on hand that suits them. And all sorts of "independent" experts can ruin their raspberries. Therefore, in their draft resolution, chemical weapons are tightly tied to the ATS.
              1. +10
                3 November 2017 09: 14
                Quote: Jedi
                The US already has a fake report on hand

                It’s for you “fake”, and for satellites of hegemony and the rest of the vassality, the most that is true. And no doubt!
                1. +6
                  3 November 2017 09: 23
                  You will not believe it, but I am deeply violet opinion of satellites and vassality on this issue. I’m interested in whose position on this issue wins. And I really hope that it is Russian. soldier
                  1. +9
                    3 November 2017 10: 53
                    Quote: Jedi
                    whose position on this issue will win.

                    The position of the `` missionary '' is higher and more preferable! In all senses feel
                    1. +6
                      3 November 2017 10: 56
                      What a rascal you are. lol
  2. +2
    3 November 2017 08: 42
    Russia submitted to the UN Security Council its draft resolution on the extension of the mandate of the mission to investigate chemical attacks in Syria
    Something tells me that even if our project repeats word-for-word the previously submitted US project, which Russia has blocked, the United States will now block it, as a “mirror measure”. But the fact of the matter is that our project does not repeat the American one, but the chance of imposing a veto is also very significant. And to be honest, without the work of our representatives in the control groups, again everything will be limited to browsing the Internet and collecting evidence there.
  3. +7
    3 November 2017 08: 43
    Veto for veto ...
    1. +8
      3 November 2017 08: 54
      Marina! love soldier
      Quote: Masya Masya
      Veto for veto ...

      Exactly
      1. +8
        3 November 2017 09: 20
        Konstantin, howdy there! love

        At this pace, soon we will all be blind and toothless ... crying
  4. +1
    3 November 2017 08: 50
    if Russia, then block request
  5. +3
    3 November 2017 09: 04
    Moscow proposes to send experts to Khan Sheikhun “for a full-scale investigation

    Why go somewhere if all the information can be obtained from London via the Internet at the "Syrian Observatory" wassat
  6. +1
    3 November 2017 09: 58
    And whoever will block this project is the one who covered and organized provocations with chemical attacks!

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"