Military Review

Special Forces Airborne before the end of the year will receive about 40 armored vehicles "Tiger-M"

35
The special units of the Airborne Forces of Russia will receive about 2017 Tiger-M armored vehicles with a remote-controlled Arbalet module by the end of 40, the Information and Mass Communications Department of the Russian Defense Ministry said on Wednesday.


The modernized "Tigers" will significantly increase the combat capabilities and mobility of the reconnaissance groups of the special forces of the Russian Airborne Forces, their ability to perform tasks in isolation from the main landing forces.

Special Forces Airborne before the end of the year will receive about 40 armored vehicles "Tiger-M"


By the end of this year, the special purpose units of the Airborne Forces will be commissioned around 40 special vehicles "Tiger-M" with a remote-controlled module "Crossbow". The modernized "Tigers" are equipped with a large-caliber machine gun and a modern optical-electronic reconnaissance complex, which includes the newest navigation and orientation system, a television camera, a thermal imager, a laser range finder and other special equipment
"It was informed.

It noted that the latest armored vehicles with an automated combat module and remote control, if necessary, can use the means of fast masking in automatic mode.

Armored cars "Tiger" - a family of Russian multi-purpose off-road vehicles. The machine is designed to transport people and various goods on roads and off-road, as well as the installation of various equipment. Depending on the modification, "Tiger" is capable of transporting from 6 to 10 a person, including the driver, or up to 1,2, thousands of kilograms of cargo, reports RIA News.
Photos used:
RIA News
35 comments
Ad

Our projects are looking for authors in the news and analytical departments. Requirements for applicants: literacy, responsibility, efficiency, inexhaustible creative energy, experience in copywriting or journalism, the ability to quickly analyze text and check facts, write concisely and interestingly on political and economic topics. The work is paid. Contact: [email protected]

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Herculesic
    Herculesic 1 November 2017 16: 11 New
    0
    They have not yet been dropped from planes to check how they will behave in flight? In appearance, the machine is normal, and so those who operate it can judge.
    1. stolz
      stolz 1 November 2017 17: 52 New
      0
      It’s just an improved copy of a spiritual jihad mobile, they won’t learn the good, but any mucks it means.
    2. ID90
      ID90 1 November 2017 18: 41 New
      +1
      Quote: Herkulesich
      They have not yet been dropped from planes to check how they will behave in flight? In appearance, the machine is normal, and so those who operate it can judge.

      You just have not seen the new TIGER model. the original is classified, but the principle is in the photo.

  2. san4es
    san4es 1 November 2017 16: 21 New
    +9
    40 armored vehicles "Tiger-M" with a remotely controlled module "Crossbow"




    soldier
    1. Alexander War
      Alexander War 1 November 2017 16: 44 New
      +2
      It has long been waiting for the remote module for the Tiger yes For the Airborne Forces, I don’t know how the Tiger was tested, plus how the module will behave
  3. Kurochkin
    Kurochkin 1 November 2017 16: 49 New
    0
    It's great !!!!
  4. Doliva63
    Doliva63 1 November 2017 17: 43 New
    +8
    I’m thinking that Special Operations Forces were created for operations in the deep (over 300 km) rear of the enemy. How do they get there with these Tigers? UAZs could even be transported by helicopter, but how are these? Or are special forces now replaced by air assault troops? Someone explain?
    1. Großer feldherr
      Großer feldherr 1 November 2017 21: 49 New
      +1
      Actions in the rear, this is already to the FSB, only agents will allow operations at such a distance. Now the SPN is primarily all kinds of DRGs for which the “tiger" is very, very good (it’s still been swimming, but it’s alright, but there’s armor from the rifle, unlike all its predecessors)
      1. Doliva63
        Doliva63 1 November 2017 22: 09 New
        +9
        Do you have an American flag and brains too? I don’t know where to laugh on this site or where to cry. Maybe you need to add on the avatar short information about belonging to the army? It seems that there are only a few army units left. I don’t even know what to answer to your nonsense recourse
        1. Großer feldherr
          Großer feldherr 1 November 2017 22: 33 New
          0
          "- Do you see a gopher?"
          - No!
          - And I do not see. And he is! "

          It's me in your flag, or rather, about its absence.
          Quote: Doliva63
          Special forces were created for operations in the deep (over 300 km) rear of the enemy. How do they get there with these Tigers? UAZs could even be transported by helicopter

          Those. this is not nonsense, but my comment is nonsense ... okay, at least in the fact that there were only a few troops left here, I absolutely agree.
    2. vomag
      vomag 2 November 2017 10: 21 New
      +1
      Quote: Doliva63
      How do they get there with these Tigers?

      No matter how! There is either a throw-out or a front line crossing and kicking ... FEET ... sir, sweetheart! I read your comments and realized that you have a distant relation to the SPN troops .... And if you think that in the deep rear of the enemy the SPN is driving on tigers and UAZs and making a noise there, then stop using cognac and you probably didn’t drink 200 grams ... .
  5. Xscorpion
    Xscorpion 1 November 2017 18: 04 New
    +1
    Quote: Doliva63
    I’m thinking that Special Operations Forces were created for operations in the deep (over 300 km) rear of the enemy. How do they get there with these Tigers? UAZs could even be transported by helicopter, but how are these? Or are special forces now replaced by air assault troops? Someone explain?


    Special forces have different tasks, not just deep intelligence.
    1. Doliva63
      Doliva63 1 November 2017 19: 31 New
      +9
      Tell me, because I was stuck in the early 90s, when the tasks were: conducting reconnaissance, searching for and destroying KP, communication centers, WMD delivery vehicles, seizing / destroying strategically important objects, working with the rebel, people's liberation movement - organizing agent intelligence and subversive activities on enemy territory. That after 250 gr. Cognac could remember drinks Now what?
  6. Holoy
    Holoy 1 November 2017 20: 32 New
    0
    The 45th separate guards brigade of a special purpose needs not this to collapse! First of all, we need good small arms without strong recoil, not heavy and with good lethal force ... Then it would be nice for them to get good diving kits with breathing apparatus with a closed respiratory system abroad ... and even ours are heavy and uncomfortable!
    1. Großer feldherr
      Großer feldherr 1 November 2017 22: 01 New
      0
      The ak74m has almost no return, what are you talking about?
      In the Russian army with sights, communications, means of observation and tsu, it’s not even a disaster, but a disaster, yes.
      1. Holoy
        Holoy 1 November 2017 22: 45 New
        0
        Quote: Großer Feldherr
        The ak74m has almost no return, what are you talking about?

        A completely useless weapon for remote combat ...
        Communications in Deep Intelligence? It's time to revive the pigeon ... Everything else is scanned ...
        1. Großer feldherr
          Großer feldherr 2 November 2017 00: 02 New
          0
          On average, up to 400 meters, 5.45 has good flatness and can confidently hit. It is not in vain that the PSO is often put on an ak74m.
          For remote combat in a regular DRG there are 2 snipers and 2 machine gunners.
          And communication is our everything.
          Nowhere without her.
          1. Holoy
            Holoy 2 November 2017 03: 50 New
            0
            Yeah ... what kind of deep intelligence do snipers have, what kind of machine gunners? If only machine guns and rifles, and even better portable rocket launchers are embedded in the caches ... in advance. Deep intelligence is generally for the most part operational work on enemy territory using methods of recruitment and psychological warfare. There, groups are abandoned with minimal weight, and a lot of money and fake documents. Often, 150 km or even 200 km to a walking location ... This is not tactical reconnaissance.
            AKs have not been relevant there for a long time. In case of contact, you need a light, accurate, with a good range ...

            Any walkie-talkie for Long-Range Intelligence groups is doom, spotted, and destroyed! There, other communication methods are needed ... I did not joke about Pigeons ...
            1. Doliva63
              Doliva63 2 November 2017 17: 21 New
              +6
              Buddy, deep intelligence, as such, has never been! fool
              There were deep reconnaissance companies - since the 80s they have been reconnaissance-assault companies of reconnaissance battalions.
              experts! laughing
              1. Holoy
                Holoy 2 November 2017 18: 27 New
                0
                Quote: Doliva63
                Buddy, deep intelligence, as such, has never been!
                There were deep reconnaissance companies - since the 80s they have been reconnaissance-assault companies of reconnaissance battalions.
                experts!

                You would less read any garbage on the Internet. Deep intelligence has always been. It’s just a specific event, and there can’t be mass if there is no war. During the war, partisans played the role of deep reconnaissance, in peacetime when the army cockade expanded its role, Vympel from the KGB took over, in the 90s the 45th Airborne Regiment, Now MTR. Moreover, modern deep intelligence in peacetime acts on the territory of a potential enemy ... In the United States, the Delta, for example, has been deployed by all personnel under all kinds of coverings in enemy countries. and conducts work there, it is especially visible in Ukraine ...
                1. Doliva63
                  Doliva63 3 November 2017 19: 41 New
                  +6
                  And then there is garbage from the Internet? laughing Are you dumb It was never. I’m telling you as a former specialist. I would be sober, I would not even talk. Read how military / military intelligence works, find the word "deep". laughing
          2. Doliva63
            Doliva63 2 November 2017 17: 10 New
            +6
            Gee! On the staff of which units is the "" full-time DRG ", interesting? laughing
            1. Holoy
              Holoy 2 November 2017 18: 32 New
              +1
              In fact, special forces this is the DRG.
              1. Doliva63
                Doliva63 2 November 2017 19: 22 New
                +6
                There is no "in fact" in the army, there is a staff list, there are no DRGs there. Read the Internet, or something, since I had no chance to serve in the army. And do not read the media, only the source!
                1. Holoy
                  Holoy 2 November 2017 21: 25 New
                  0
                  Gee ... and you find out the role of tactical intelligence, where there is a sabotage component ...
                  1. Doliva63
                    Doliva63 3 November 2017 19: 21 New
                    +6
                    Why should I find out? According to the VUS, the use of tactical reconnaissance units (or something like that, I don’t remember already), in the 80s the Master was qualified. I think nichrome has not changed since then. For information lobotryasov - in all types of military intelligence there are only reconnaissance groups (we will omit the nuances for now). Tasks can have different, and other tasks, according to the "Fundamentals of combat use ...", etc., can become priorities, although initially they were not. In short. There were never any RDGs in the army. The most unusual thing I met was an air assault platoon consisting of 3 reconnaissance assault groups (RCGs). However, when the groups were used for their intended purpose, they were called Reconnaissance group number such and such. If that is interesting, ask, do not be shy, you can in a "personal".
          3. Doliva63
            Doliva63 2 November 2017 17: 34 New
            +6
            In stagnant times, we didn’t have an AK74M, I can’t say anything, but at 300-400 meters I shot well and excellently even from the AK74U. I’m not talking about the regular AKMSN2.
      2. Grits
        Grits 2 November 2017 09: 00 New
        +1
        In the Russian army with sights, communications, means of observation and tsu, it’s not even a disaster, but a disaster, yes.
        Are you doing very well with this? Perfectly. In that case, we just have excellent EW
        1. Doliva63
          Doliva63 2 November 2017 17: 47 New
          +6
          I don’t know for the entire army, but in DDR and SPN, day / night sights were on every 3rd assault rifle, every 2nd machine gun and on each RPG - it was quite enough. Each intelligence officer had the means of communication, if necessary (and even more - I carried another separate radio group with me). There was generally “no way” with surveillance equipment - in each company there were 2 sets of “Realities”, binoculars, karalons, night vision goggles. What else is needed for happiness? Only adequate personnel with burning eyes, which we had drinks
  7. Incvizitor
    Incvizitor 1 November 2017 21: 03 New
    +1
    It would be nice with ags yet.
    1. Doliva63
      Doliva63 1 November 2017 22: 11 New
      +7
      What for? Maybe even attach an infantry company behind? That's what intelligence is in question, isn't it?
      1. Incvizitor
        Incvizitor 2 November 2017 02: 14 New
        0
        If the AGS fight is definitely not superfluous, I'm not talking about 30 mm laughing
        1. Doliva63
          Doliva63 2 November 2017 17: 56 New
          +6
          Firstly, a reconnaissance battle is the end of reconnaissance. They will not be praised for this, to say the least. I was once in a large headquarters, they were literally yelling - intelligence, where is the enemy, your mother ?! Therefore, intelligence bypasses possible collisions and moves on.
          Secondly, how much does that AGS weigh and who will carry it, if every scout counts? The most difficult thing was RPG, you can jump with it, but with AGS?
          It seems that ABO aborigines know about intelligence only from the cinema and the media.
          P.S. There were more ATGMs, but this is a separate song.
    2. ID90
      ID90 1 November 2017 22: 23 New
      +1
      Quote: Incvizitor
      It would be nice with ags yet.

      and caliber on top?
      laughing
  8. Grits
    Grits 2 November 2017 09: 04 New
    +1
    For the Airborne, it seems, they are intensely preparing "Typhoon". Then what is the point of the “Tigers” now for these purposes to send? Which have not even been tested as an airborne vehicle. Most likely, as we always have, before the appearance of the "Typhoon", apparently, even as far as the moon on foot.