India tested BrahMos supersonic rocket

RIA News. The Indian Army on Wednesday conducted another successful test of the BrahMos supersonic rocket, developed by Indian and Russian specialists, the Times of India newspaper reported.

According to the military command, the launch of a ground-to-ground missile, which is in service with the ground forces, took place at the Chandipur range in the state of Orissa in eastern India and was recognized as successful.

The Brahmos missile systems of sea and land bases are already in service with the naval and land forces of India. Preparations are underway for the installation of this weapon on fighters and submarines.

Currently, the Indian Army has two regiments deployed with BrahMos missile systems capable of hitting targets at a distance of up to 300 kilometers at speeds of up to three Machs. According to media reports, such missiles are also planned to equip another regiment, which will be deployed in the state of Arunachal Pradesh on the Chinese border.

The Russian-Indian joint venture BrahMos Aerospace, created by the Indian Organization for Defense Research and Development (DRDO) and the Russian NPO Mashinostroeniya, is named after the rivers of India and Russia - the Brahmaputra and Moscow. Its headquarters is located in New Delhi. The company produces two-stage solid-fuel supersonic cruise missiles with a range of 290 kilometers, capable of carrying warheads weighing 200-300 kilograms.

Comments

[tronin.maxim]

What would you do India without us ?!

[flukked]

would buy elsewhere.

[Ziksura]

Quote: flukked

would buy elsewhere.

That is, I would buy, but not produce. Feel the difference.

[Sergh]

This weapon is real Russian, everyone knows the amers, don’t stick your nose here, it will bite. Fuck, here's a cool thing, and with the Su30MK

[755962]

Quote: Sergh

both from land and from the sea

Brahmos block 1 - the option for firing at ground targets seems to be equipped with an inertial control system and GOS with guidance on the radar portrait of the target. Brahmos block 2 - In the media there was information about the use of GOS operating in a wide range of frequencies (optical + GOS radar apparently). Perhaps the appearance of a modification with a passive radar GSN.- BrahMos block 1 Sea LACM - Conditional name, sea-based KR - LACM - Land Attack Cruise Missile; BrahMos block 2 LACM - Land-based cruise missile with vertical launch SPU, LACM - Land Attack Cruise Missile; SPU based on the Tatra vehicle (manufactured in India, license), wheel arrangement 12 x 12, on SPU 3 TPK with missiles, launch from a vertical position. Presumably, the missile can be equipped with a nuclear warhead and a new control system for use on ground targets. - BrahMos block 2 (option II) - conditional name, ship-based anti-ship missiles with vertical launch launcher, conditional variant name;BrahMos (option III) - RCC for basing on submarines with vertical launch launchers, the name of the option is conditional; April 20, 2010 announced the completion of the development of the rocket and the readiness of the rocket for testing;
- BrahMos A / BrahMos (option IV) - RCC aviation-based, the name of the option is conditional; The development of an air-based missile was completed on May 12, 2010. It is planned to conduct tests with the Su-30MKI fighter (2 units are being converted) from 2011 to 2012. The missiles are equipped with a new fairing of the frontal air intake.
Plumage added on the ramjet nozzle
Missile weight reduced by 500 kg. Universal mallet.

[Neighbor]

Quote: tronin.maxim

What would you do India without us ?!

Probably I would have gone along the path of the Chinese - I would rub everything that is possible and impossible and sculpt it - what happens. If only the outward resemblance was!

[Gurza]

It is interesting to know, India has 2 regiments of such missiles, why are they not accepting ours? Or are they just preparing something of their own? Maybe under the S-500 or a new missile for the Iskander. I would like to know more!

[serg792002]

The missile is based on the P-800 Onyx (more precisely, on its export version - Yakhont) - the development of the NPO Mashinostroyeniya of the 1980s. BrahMos is capable of speeds from 2,5 to 2,8 Mach.
It has long been in service.

[Gurza]

I did not know, thanks for the info. I’ll joke further on other resources.

[Bat1stuta]

most importantly, Indians do not suffer from garbage and do not buy cheap spare parts for missiles. but how with MiGs, they will fall ... before reaching the target ... on their own army.

[Mr.Advokat]

China is their adversary, therefore all counterfeit goods from Russia go :-) and to Russia - from China :-) this is how China with our help fights against India and undermines our competitiveness in the global arms market

[Dmitriy69]

And the Nndus don’t dare to crack bread, they don’t wait until the democrats knock on the door.

[VAF]

Our yakhont is the best!
Forward Russian rocket launchers, implement hypersonic variant faster!

Then just amers with their AUG and AUS "wash for a long time"!

[flukked]

And how do they interfere with the AUGs? Are they not fulfilling their tasks? Well, the Russians have rockets and they still will not shoot.

[Vanek]

Quote: flukked

Well, the Russians have rockets and they still will not shoot.

What is that supposed to mean?
Now, if they beat you, will you also remember this saying?
My wife was offended by a bully (he pushed and even blurted out something unpleasant) so I punched his head with a gun. Well, by the way, yes, we won’t shoot.

[flukked]

The United States has nuclear weapons and we have nuclear weapons. Our missile attack on the USA AUG will entail a nuclear strike, the attack of the USA AUG on our territory will entail a nuclear strike. A nuclear strike would entail a retaliatory nuclear strike. And this is the total collapse of human civilization.
It follows that only the patient will send the USA AUG to Russia and only the patient will send Russian missiles to the USA AUG.
But the whole problem is that AUG Americans use perfectly well in combat without strikes against Russia, but our anti-ship missiles have never attacked anyone in their entire history, because they are focused on fighting AUG, and they have no fight with AUG capabilities.

To defend their interests in the territory of a third country, the United States can use the ACG and do it. And our anti-ship missiles languish in the mines.
The same Granite, in fact, already decommissioned, did not perform a single combat mission.

[Andrey_K]

Progress does not stand still.
It may happen that soon everyone will learn to shoot down ballistic missiles and then ... the fun begins.

[Ziksura]

[quote = Andrey_K] Progress does not stand still.
It may happen that soon everyone will learn to shoot down ballistic missiles and then ... the fun will begin. [/ Quote
It will happen only if a more effective alternative to ballistic missiles is invented. And so: the competition of armor and shell-weapons and anti-weapons FOREVER. Progress is possible, victory is never.

[Andrey_K]

I can cite several ways to this:
1) Improving conventional air defense (c500 is already approaching this)
2) Use of an electromagnetic pulse - a huge phased antenna array can not only effectively detect targets, but if used as a microwave emitter, hit these targets with an electromagnetic pulse.
3) Laser technology - a sufficiently powerful (even ground stationary) laser is quite capable of destroying missiles at any height.

[Ziksura]

Quote: flukked

The United States has nuclear weapons and we have nuclear weapons. Our missile attack on the USA AUG will entail a nuclear strike, the attack of the USA AUG on our territory will entail a nuclear strike

This is definitely because the strike of the AUG in our territory is the beginning of a military invasion. A strike by a Russian missile on an AUG is a defense against invasion. And will there be a nuclear strike in response to this, and not let’s say the start of peace talks is a BIG question, for

Quote: flukked

A nuclear strike would entail a retaliatory nuclear strike. And this is the total collapse of human civilization.

Cheaper to give up ambition.

Quote: flukked

The same Granite, in fact, already decommissioned, did not perform a single combat mission.

The best weapon is not that it fights well, but that can prevent a war by the very fact of its presence.

[signalman]

Quote: flukked

but our anti-ship missiles in their entire history have never attacked anyone

On October 21, 1967, in the Nile Delta region, four P-15 missiles launched from Egyptian boats of Project 183P sank the Israeli destroyer Eilat. This was the first case in history of the combat use of homing cruise missiles. Learn military history, and do not bother before ... nddosami.

[Zynaps]

Quote: flukked

Our missile attack on the USA AUG will entail a nuclear strike, the attack of the USA AUG on our territory will entail a nuclear strike.

not obvious due to unpredictable consequences. and very much depends on in response to which a missile strike was applied. dismantling with conventional weapons is more likely, especially if one side has clear superiority, plus a more favorable geopolitical position.

Quote: flukked

And this is the total collapse of human civilization.

the collapse did not occur when the Yankees were ass-fucked in Korea and Vietnam. even such a scumbag as President Truman was trying to take away the idiot MacArthur when he began to push through the use of nuclear weapons in response to the stalemate in Korea.

Quote: flukked

our RCCs in their entire history have never attacked anyone, because they are imprisoned in the fight against AUG, and they have no opportunity to fight against AUG.

time.

Quote: flukked

And our anti-ship missiles languish in the mines. The same Granite, in fact, already decommissioned, did not perform a single combat mission.

two.

such ordinary teenagers can not be trusted even with an ordinary bogeyman, and not just with a short barrel or, especially, anti-ship missiles. this is precisely the gusto for a normal state: to have weapons and not to use them. not because they themselves were scared, but because potential lovers of other people's nishtyaks would think about the consequences two hundred times before climbing on the rampage, knowing in advance about the presence of these very weapons on the enemy. In any case, these missiles are a guarantee that you will not be treated according to the Yugoslav, Iraqi or Libyan scenario. otherwise it’s possible to cry that the USSR-RF has nuclear weapons, and has never used it right and left. byad!

[Норд]

Of course, the best. Therefore, the United States bought in the 93rd batch to study how to deal with them and train the crew of carrier-based aircraft.
I would pull the legs from one place to those who went on this sale.
One thing pleases - the developers were not idle.

[Krilion]

Quote: veteran.air force

Then just amers with their AUG and AUS "wash for a long time"!

like it’s already long been decided that AUGs are easier to cover with a tactical nuclear charge, instead of picking with such toothpicks ..

[VAF]

Quote: Krilion

like it’s already long been decided that AUGs are easier to cover with a tactical nuclear charge,

These are the thoughts of "war theorists" and ours, since so far we are not able to adequately answer the OSB, I hope that this "for now" will be quickly liquidated!

And any use in a clash, armed conflict in a regional war, etc. any ammunition with "nuclear" stuffing will entail retaliatory reactions with the use of strategic nuclear forces, which will lead to irreparable consequences for the parties to the conflict and for neighbors, and for the whole world!
Therefore, all countries with weapons of nuclear attack or counteraction (as it is now fashionable to call them) are defending by all means the free possibility of using these means with appropriate measures !!!

[Zynaps]

the brilliance and poverty of nuclear weapons lie in the fact that it is not a weapon of the battlefield, but only the last argument of the kings. if a superpower sticks a toothpick in the ass, a nuclear strike is unlikely to follow - a clear overkill - they will try to figure out using conventional weapons in response.

and in general, a strange approach to business: if there is a sledgehammer on the farm, then it does not follow from its presence that there should not be drills, hammers and pliers on the farm.

[VAF]

Quote: Zynaps

the splendor and poverty of nuclear weapons are

And beautifully and competently! +!

[rolik]

The developed rocket "Bramos" is based on the P-800 Onyx (more precisely, on its export version - Yakhont) - the development of NPO Mashinostroyenia in the 1980s.
The assembly is carried out by BrahMos Aerospace in Hyderabad and the Federal State Unitary Enterprise “PO“ Strela ”in Orenburg. 2016 missiles are planned to be produced by 1000, half of which are planned to be sold to third countries. It is interesting that Iran is not meant by third countries.

[lars]

Syria is already ...

[Jaguar]

What does Syria have to do with it? They have Onyxes and not Brahmos based on them

[VAF]

quote = Jaguar] They have Onyxes, not Brahmos based on them [/ quote]

The Syrians Yakhont! Well, I already wrote in detail on this topic here, so you’ll figure it out!

[VAF]

Quote: rolik

The developed rocket "Brahmos" is based on the P-800 Onyx

If absolutely for sure, then you are right here, + !!! because ....- P-800 "Onyx" (Navy URAI Index - 3M55, export name - "Yakhont", according to the classification of the US and NATO Defense Forces - SS-N-26 Strobile (English "conifer cone")) - Soviet / Russian medium-range universal anti-ship missile, designed to combat surface naval groups and single ships in conditions of strong fire and electronic countermeasures.

The Russian side is responsible for the creation of the rocket (glider and power plant), India - the control system. The acceleration of work was facilitated by a high degree of unification between the BraMos anti-ship missiles and the Russian Onyx missile.

Since 1998, the further development of Onyx anti-ship missiles (namely, the original Onyx, and not the export Yakhont) has been carried out by the BrahMos Aerospace Pvt. Ltd., a joint Russian-Indian venture founded on 12.02.98/1999/XNUMX, founded by Defense Research and Development Organization (DRDO - Defense Research and Development Organization) of the Ministry of Defense of India and the NGO Engineering. The word "BrahMos" (BrahMos) is made up of the names of two rivers - the Brahmaputra in India and Moscow in Russia. In XNUMX, work began on the complex in related design bureaus.

Serial production of the rocket was launched in January 2004. For 2005-2006. the capacities of adjacent plants allowed to produce 100 missiles per year, in 2009 - already 200 missiles. During the serial production, about half of the components are planned to be produced at Strela NPO (Orenburg).

Under third parties it can be assumed, but only according to "rumors", that Iran and Venezuela have applied, and Bastions with Yakhonts have been installed in Syria, but from Syria to Iran is "a stone's throw" !!!

[dred]

So ours will not buy it.

[Lord of the Sith]

Performance characteristics

Firing range:
300 km combined trajectory
At low altitude 120 km
Flight altitude: 5-15000 m
Airspeed:
At high altitude 750 m / s
At low altitude 2 Mach
Control system: inertial with RGSN
Rocket Launch Weight:
Airborne - 2500 kg
ship-based - 3000 kg
Type of propulsion engine SPVRD
Thrust 4000 kgf
Warhead: piercing
warhead weight - up to 300 kg
Life time: to 10 years

Status

The missile adopted by the Indian Navy. March 4, 2009 was a successful test to defeat the target.

The assembly is carried out by JI “BrahMos Aerospace” in Hyderabad and OJSC “PO Strela” in Orenburg. Until 2016, it is planned to produce 1000 missiles, of which half are planned to be sold to third countries.

On September 5, 2010, a rocket was launched from the Chandipur training ground in India and for the first time in the world demonstrated a dive at supersonic speed.

[Nickolay3145]

Hindus are brothers !!!

[Igorboss16]

it’s necessary to transfer a partiq to Iran, here the amers will fall off

[Jaguar]

Hindus will be against it. Since the Iranians can then transfer them to the Chinese. Anti-ship gauges can be Iran, since the Chinese already have them

[bremest]

Ours needs to develop and adopt a more advanced version of hypersonic missiles in order to be able to control the Aegis missile defense system at a distance of 1000 km or more. from the coast and so that politicians and generals of the USA and NATO sit in the brain. And internationally, it is time to actively accuse the United States of violating international law and without hesitation to supply defensive weapons to countries that may be subject to armed intervention. To motivate all this only by the desire to protect civilians and preserve peace and stability.

[sergo0000]

This is the real result of Russian-Indian cooperation in the military sphere! And that says a lot. Thus, you can do a lot together. Example to others!

[Pacifist]

A bit funny.
Every time I hear about the BrahMos rocket, I smile, I remember the old joke about its name "The Hindus initially suggested that the rocket be named after the Ganges and Don rivers, but our people dissuaded them ... it is very inconvenient to advertise, and the enemy is somehow very humiliating"

[bremest]

We should also cooperate with the Indians because it was precisely these people who in the past had great knowledge in the field of aircraft and rocket science. In particular, the ancient book - Vimanika-sastra tells a lot. Below are some excerpts that give reason to think about the level of achievements of civilization.

Chaapala. When an enemy aircraft appears in the field of view, then by turning the power center switch located in the central compartment of the vimaana, an atmospheric wave is created, which propagates at a speed of 4087 revolutions per hour, and shakes the enemy’s aircraft.


Sarvatomukha. When a squadron of enemy aircraft attacks the vimaana, they turn the switch located at the very top of the vimaana. As a result, the vimaana will begin to spin rapidly, turning around on all sides.


Parashabda Graahaka. As explained in the Sudominical, or Science of Electronics, thanks to the sound-catching yantra installed in the vimaana, it is possible to hear conversations and sounds coming from an enemy aircraft.


Roopaakarshana. Through the photographic yantra mounted on board the vimaana, one can obtain a “television” image of what is happening in the vimaana of the enemy.

Who cares is the link - http://lib.rus.ec/b/323401/read#t3

[patriot2]

Pacifist,
The Hindus initially proposed to name the rocket in honor of the Ganges and Don rivers, but ours dissuaded them ... it is very inconvenient to advertise, and the enemy is somehow very humiliating
Did the GDP (the rally on Bolotnaya) talk about them, forgetting that the missile was named BrahMos. Here you can understand who needs 1000 pieces.Something the trolls are quiet!

[escobar]

In terms of microelectronics and software. the Indians have made great progress. But it is impossible to bring all the components of the rocket to the Indians themselves without RUSSIA.

[sazhka0]

How strange it is .. So if China steals our technology .. Oh. which is not good .. If India starts to do something all right .. But then they just like the Chinese will say, Guys, why do we need you ??? We need to sell away from ourselves .. So that in the morning there is no "headache" .. And then to whom we sell everything so close .. RUSSIA has no "friends" .. And never will .. Even the Bulgarians have sold out .. It is necessary " think "of myself and not Indians. Not everything can be passed on to money.

[savelij]

During the tests, 200 stokers died!

[APASUS]

One thing is good that Soviet developments are living and developing! It's not like when Gorbachev blew up visitors from the United States at the training grounds