Military Review

Clone C-300 in action: Chinese exercises of HQ-9 air defense systems

9
Hongzi-9 or HQ-9 - Chinese long-range anti-aircraft missile system. Intended for hitting airplanes, cruise missiles and helicopters. The first Chinese air defense missile system capable of intercepting ballistic missiles.


9 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. ImPerts
    ImPerts 31 October 2017 19: 15 New
    0
    Making outwardly similar does not mean doing the same.

    Although the Chinese are well done, a world xerox.
    1. Mih1974
      Mih1974 1 November 2017 05: 05 New
      +1
      Xerox is a copy machine, here we see only a semblance. In order to at least compare something, you need to know the details that no one will tell us.
      Moreover, I would be wary of the fact that the Chinese really make a copy. Remember the USSR began industrialization and how our engineers copied, but almost immediately processed and made much better samples. good . For example, tanks - in 1920 (let’s leave total devastation for now) there were only captured English tanks, in 1941 German scum that wrapped the intestines of French, Poles, Czechs on caterpillars killed themselves on the wall of KV-1 and T-34 !! good
      That is, on the one hand, it’s good that they do not show anything fundamentally new, on the other hand, it shows the impasse of their development and in the next big war they can be crushed as at one time Poles. This, as it were, makes them “not our adversary”, but also “not an ally” whom they will not rely on in case of a big war.
      Maybe I’m wrong, I’m not flattering myself true in the last resort, so if someone can bring at least one Achievement of science and technology from China (the present, and not antiques - paper, gunpowder, porcelain) .. repeat All that falls into my “paws” or in a photo or video is a degraded cheap version of someone else’s idea or “licked” to optimality such as high-speed trains. It’s not the first year that China has been the first economy in the world (and it doesn’t matter that they recently recognized it), they outbid tens of thousands of scientists from the West, but so far not a single “breakthrough achievement”. request
      1. Evil Elf
        Evil Elf 1 November 2017 12: 59 New
        +2
        Xerox, this is actually a surname. And the man’s name was Rank. Ranck Xerox. He came up with a way to transfer images and founded a company which gave his name. And with someone’s light hand, all copiers began to be called photocopiers. By the way, Dolby is also not a noise suppressor, but a surname. And the man’s name was Ray Milton Dolby. He came up with a compander noise suppressor, created a company, read the rest above)))))))
  2. NEXUS
    NEXUS 31 October 2017 19: 43 New
    +2
    More and more complicate the life of mattresses. We would also not need to cut the defense budget, but on the contrary, maybe, many promising projects ran into the wall.
    1. Cossack 471
      Cossack 471 31 October 2017 20: 14 New
      0
      Yeah . exactly copied. It is interesting and sees the f-35 or "the soldier will not offend the child"?
  3. Victor_B
    Victor_B 31 October 2017 22: 51 New
    0
    The main thing is that everything is explained simply and intelligibly. :))
    In detail, with numbers.
    And where does the S-300-400?
    Exclusively with your mind and talent!
  4. gorenina91
    gorenina91 1 November 2017 02: 40 New
    +1
    -Well, and what is the Chinese "Hongqi-9 or HQ-9" worse than Russian ..? - Yes, and cheaper ...
    -And what have our achieved ... by giving all this to the Chinas ...? -What is there to rejoice ..?
    -And a hedgehog it’s clear that all this will not reach Japan and America ... -And this is where all this can fly ... -It is not necessary to guess and guess ...
    1. Evil Elf
      Evil Elf 1 November 2017 13: 01 New
      0
      We saw there on the side when lifting the launch containers a huge LCD screen. In Russian, this is not.
    2. SergF123
      SergF123 1 November 2017 18: 56 New
      0
      These are technologies of 20 years ago, that's why we sell them))) You’re stupid “ours” - although the chips in the s-300 are Chinese))))))