Ministry of Defense spoke about the priorities of the armaments program

October 31 2017 28

The priority direction of the state armament program for 2018-2025 will be the development of strategic nuclear forces and high-precision weapons, Deputy Defense Minister Yury Borisov said in an interview with the newspaper Military Industrial Courier.

He recalled that nuclear forces are the main deterrent to possible aggression against Russia.

Ministry of Defense spoke about the priorities of the armaments program

Our nuclear missile shield must be reliable so that no one has even thought to try us for strength

- noted Borisov.

As for high-precision weapons, according to the deputy minister, it begins to play an increasing role in modern local conflicts.

Of course, robotics will receive new development, since the general trend is to conduct combat operations without human intervention. And although it is still far from highly intelligent systems, Robots - already the norm

- added Borisov.

He expressed confidence that by the 2025 – 2026 years in Russia there will be new types of weapons that will make major changes in the strategy and tactics of combat.

In September, Deputy Prime Minister Dmitry Rogozin noted that the state program could be accepted until the end of the year, and the emphasis in it would be not on modernization, but on creating new types of weapons, reports RIA News

Information

Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.

NEXUS

+5

31 October 2017 13: 54

In this regard, the question of updating the fleets with promising and new strike complexes and ships is very interesting. As well as the development of space groups, including strike systems.
1. maxim947
  
  0
  
  31 October 2017 13: 59
  
  These are R&D, which in recent years have been “cut” a little, you cannot create anything from scratch. So we are waiting for the opening of new "topics".
  1. weksha50
    
    0
    
    31 October 2017 19: 44
    
    Quote: maxim947
    These are R&D, which in recent years have been “cut” a little, you cannot create anything from scratch. So we are waiting for the opening of new "topics".
    
    Here, most likely, there will be no truly new topics ... There is still a lot that is ahead of its time from the Soviet backlog ... It is not necessary, of course, that everything must be brought up to modern requirements and possibilities ...
2. Herculesic
  
  +3
  
  31 October 2017 14: 02
  
  For space, trampolines are from Rogozin, and the fleet as it was will remain the WBF-Military-tug fleet, diluted with a certain number of corvettes and frigates, do not expect anything larger for many years, only now they will put 4 launches under the “zircon” on each new tug and marine version of the "torus"!
  1. Mestny
    
    0
    
    31 October 2017 14: 36
    
    And all this is written in an interview with the Military-Industrial Courier newspaper of Deputy Defense Minister Yuri Borisov, which we are discussing here?
    What a twist!
    ... Rather, the fall would have ended ...
3. Galleon
  
  +3
  
  1 November 2017 10: 42
  
  Eh fleet-fleet ... Army generals find it easier and more expedient to prepare ground-based launchers for the Kyrgyz Republic in case of war than to invest in the construction of ships. While the fleet construction program does not have a separate bank account and priority, it will be in the position of the Cinderella in the army, and we will, as yesterday, read about replenishment of the fleets with patrol boats or raid tugs Unfortunately...
HEATHER

+3

31 October 2017 13: 55

SNF and VO are understandable. Robotics become more and more interesting. Heavy drones would be seen. But everything has its time. Just do not drag out, as with a frigate trimaran.
1. stas
  
  +2
  
  31 October 2017 14: 03
  
  Missiles are heavy drone UAVs.
  And UAVs for video surveillance will do no worse.
  The Russian economy must be made social from the market flea market for the people, and not just for profit.
  What is constantly taldychit DAM on TV.
okko077

+8

31 October 2017 14: 01

Borisov, as always, demonstrates his nearness, as well as the entire MO .... What kind of high-precision weapons can be discussed if the army does not have real-time targeting systems, if the army does not have combat information systems that allow for modern network-centric combat operations. If our squalid army does not know what the enemy is doing, even in the form of militants in Syria and cannot exercise real-time positional control of the enemy in such a small territory .... The creation of combat information systems of various levels with subsequent integration into a single system is the main parity for the non-nuclear component of our army for many years .... Without the development of this main component, the creation of new weapons systems does not make sense. Our new weapon does not know where to shoot, where to fly, does not know where the enemy is and is waiting for the spotters to give them such information at the cost of their lives, and even very late, not in real time ....
1. Govorun
  
  +4
  
  31 October 2017 15: 13
  
  Could not write "novels" here ... but simply would say "Everything is gone, the plaster is removed, the client is leaving" ....... otherwise it was different here ... although if you are a girl, we forgive you .. . for the first time.
  1. okko077
    
    +5
    
    31 October 2017 17: 33
    
    I’m already trembling ... I brought my position and briefly substantiated it ... In response, I heard babble of mumbo jumbo ... Neither tanks, nor the Airborne Forces win the modern war ... And it needs to be won even without losses, especially local ones, as in Syria ... We still do not know how, and this is bad ... This does not suit me, moreover, we have the opportunity, but alas, there is not even an understanding .... And with patriotism, stack our warriors, or ours allies, I consider it a shame ... This is about the army, or rather its leaders ... And priorities should be set on the basis of this, we are not discussing the army here, but the statements of one of its leaders ..... For lovers, whine below I can say : I am also an army ....
    1. Boa kaa
      
      +2
      
      31 October 2017 19: 53
      
      Quote: okko077
      below I can say: I am also an army ....
      Really ETA !?
      
      .... then it is clear why such pessimism and disbelief in the leadership of the Russian Defense Ministry ...
      1. Don
        
        +1
        
        31 October 2017 20: 23
        
        like an adult and on the site for a long time, but is he not ashamed of such a moral decline? or drank everything already?
        
        Boa kaa
        
        +2
        
        31 October 2017 20: 30
        
        Quote: Donskoy
        Himself is not ashamed of such a moral decline? or drank everything already?
        Respected! What are you raving about? Something did not understand about the "moral decline" ....
        By the way, I do not abuse alcohol: health does not allow. But a glass of a good "horse" is not a premium to miss 7 November ... On occasion, so to speak!
        
        Don
        
        +1
        
        31 October 2017 21: 06
        
        Quote: Boa constrictor KAA
        By the way, I do not abuse alcohol: health does not allow. But a glass of a good "horse" is not a premium to miss 7 November ... On occasion, so to speak!
        
        That you do not abuse is good. And the fact that you are going to November 7 ... - it generally pleases
        
        Boa kaa
        
        +2
        
        1 November 2017 20: 02
        
        Quote: Donskoy
        And the fact that you are going to November 7 ... - it generally pleases
        
        Well, okay!
        Be adequate, plz!
        Best regards,
kaserog

0

31 October 2017 14: 18

Quote: okko077
.Without the development of this main component,

Your opinion is very valuable to us - write more
1. Mestny
  
  +1
  
  31 October 2017 14: 38
  
  The statement "our miserable army" is especially enchanting.
  From which country the citizen is broadcasting, and about which army is not clear.
Xscorpion

+2

31 October 2017 15: 42

Quote: Mestny
The statement "our miserable army" is especially enchanting.
From which country the citizen is broadcasting, and about which army is not clear.

Well, if about the Russian, then in his opinion it turns out that the calibers for 1500 km are launched by a catapult, and if about the American, then that's right, these do not see anything and instead of militants, hundreds of civilians are felled.
Yoshi

0

31 October 2017 17: 23

A nuclear deterrence strategy is important, but an active phase of pre-empowerment wars has begun, which can only be countered by other means ...
1. Boa kaa
  
  +2
  
  31 October 2017 20: 20
  
  Quote: Yoshi
  however, the active phase of pre-emptive wars has begun, which can only be counteracted by other means ...
  
  Information:
  Pre-emptive war “is not limited to the actual military phase, but involves the large-scale use of unarmed (economic, political, ideological) violence against entire peoples and regional communities”
  
  Well, these are already questions for the country's leadership: the President, the Prime Minister, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the Central Bank, the economic bloc ... Borisov outlined the "general line" of the Russian Defense Ministry to equip the Armed Forces with new types of weapons ... pre-emptive wars refer to it as futuristic databases in four environments + cyberspace ...
  Therefore, do not be like "smart Elsa" from the Brothers Grim fairy tale crying for an unborn child ...
  1. Yoshi
    
    0
    
    31 October 2017 21: 37
    
    See immediately "informed network user." Read the source and their development (at least West Point). It will become clear who is fighting what and how. Or look at Syria and the Donbass - it’s for sure there “it is touched like futuristic databases in four environments + cyberspace ...”
Alexander War

+2

31 October 2017 17: 25

Off-topic! Very dangerous problem
1. Fedya2017
  
  +1
  
  1 November 2017 00: 28
  
  Quote: Alexander War
  dangerous problem
  
  The whole scientific world is already laughing at him ... Before blabbering, I had to at least ask him whether the Academy of Sciences and any intelligence-counterintelligence were at his disposal ... And at the level of horror stories that old women invent on benches.
Belarus is Russia

0

31 October 2017 20: 05

Well, God forbid, rearm, build up and strengthen the army of Russia Russian Orthodox, Russian Orthodox, the people of Russia Russian Orthodox.
1. raw174
  
  +2
  
  1 November 2017 10: 25
  
  Quote: Belarus is Russia
  Well, God forbid, rearm, build up and strengthen the army of Russia Russian Orthodox, Russian Orthodox, the people of Russia Russian Orthodox.
  
  i'm muslim ... won't they arm me? eh, but I really wanted to
raw174

+2

1 November 2017 10: 24

"Rather, they would have given machine guns. Machine guns, more grenades, and one mine." - from CF DMB.
Mentat

0

1 November 2017 15: 06

Quote: okko077
If our wretched army does not know

The Russian army is one of the strongest in the world, you'd better consider yourself better in the mirror. In general, this statement shows both your essence and your goal in this forum.