Military Review

Six new Su-35С are sent to Karelia

28
On Monday, the flight of six new Su-35С fighters from Komsomolsk-on-Amur to Karelia began, reports bmpd.




Aircraft designed for the 159th Guards Fighter Aviation Regiment 105th mixed aviation divisions of the 6th Leningrad Red Banner Army of the Air Force and Air Defense of the Western Military District, stationed at the Besovets airfield in Karelia.

The air regiment began to receive Su-35C fighters in November-December 2016. Then it consisted of ten aircraft of this type.

The 159 th aviation regiment became the first aviation unit of the VKS in the West of Russia, which received Su-35С aircraft. Prior to the start of 2016, this regiment was equipped with non-modernized Su-27 and Su-27UB fighters.

The aircraft were built on the Komsomolsk-on-Amur Aviation Plant (KnAAZ) under a five-year contract dated December 2015 for the supply of X-NUMX fighter jets Su-50C to the military department.



Earlier, the company "Sukhoi" successfully implemented the first contract from 2009 of the year to supply the 48 Defense Ministry of the same type of fighters. All vehicles were handed over to the military from 2012 to the beginning of 2016.
Photos used:
Svetlana Balaeva / rebucia87.livejournal.com
28 comments
Ad

The editorial board of Voenniy Obozreniye urgently needs a proofreader. Requirements: impeccable knowledge of the Russian language, diligence, discipline. Contact: [email protected]

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. bagr69
    bagr69 31 October 2017 12: 41 New
    +4
    Every week, news of new arrivals of the latest weapons. We are gaining momentum.
    The military-industrial complex pulled up very well, it would be nice to tighten some civilian areas, electric and heat power, for example.
    1. figwam
      figwam 31 October 2017 12: 58 New
      +4
      Six at once, not bad.
    2. NEXUS
      NEXUS 31 October 2017 13: 09 New
      +5
      Quote: bagr69
      Every week, news of new arrivals of the latest weapons. We are gaining momentum.

      We are not gaining momentum, but only following the rearmament program. Moreover, in many areas we have unacceptable delays. For example, in the construction of attack ships and nuclear submarines. Deliveries of the SU-35s to the VKS are priority, since we sell these fighters for export, which means real money comes to the treasury. Plus, this makes it possible to complete the SU-57 and put it into series.
      1. Stas157
        Stas157 31 October 2017 17: 43 New
        +3
        Quote: bagr69
        We are gaining momentum.

        Judging by the reduction in the military budget, we are slowing down! The whole question of money is acute. But then they find it at the Rosguard. Someone already considered that the cost of police services (Police, Rosguard, FSB ...) exceed the cost of the army! Honestly, unexpectedly! This is a clear bias, if that is true.
        1. NEXUS
          NEXUS 31 October 2017 17: 44 New
          +3
          Quote: Stas157
          Someone already considered that the cost of police services (Police, Rosguard, FSB ...),

          The answer is simple-on-the-nose presidential elections.
        2. Sergej1972
          Sergej1972 31 October 2017 22: 52 New
          +1
          Someone counted wrong.
        3. aws4
          aws4 1 November 2017 08: 49 New
          0
          I wonder what kind of armament and equipment the Rosgvard has, what can it cost more than going to the defense ????)))))))))))))
        4. You Vlad
          You Vlad 1 November 2017 08: 53 New
          0
          Quote: Stas157
          But then they find it at the Rosguard.

          I understand your excitement good Again, the oligarchs drove the planes to us, yes Stas? Well, so that the Russian population is nightmare laughing
        5. You Vlad
          You Vlad 1 November 2017 09: 01 New
          0
          Quote: Stas157
          Someone already considered that the cost of police services (Police, Rosguard, FSB ...) exceed the cost of the army!

          And stop pedaling the topic No.
          Someone counted there! fellow Over the ocean?
          1. Stas157
            Stas157 1 November 2017 17: 50 New
            +4
            Quote: You Vlad
            And stop pedaling the topic

            On your tablet, the costs of law enforcement do not explicitly include the FSB. And maybe Rosguard too.
  2. Firework
    Firework 31 October 2017 12: 58 New
    +5
    for the first time since the beginning of the 90s, the release of new aviation in large quantities has already somehow been used to this. you can recall the 90s when some samples in the amount of a pair of pieces came into service
    1. just exp
      just exp 31 October 2017 13: 11 New
      11
      Why don’t I remember this in the 90s? then no horseradish was reported at all. only in the early 90s, what else was ordered and paid for in the USSR was still received.
      and I remember how the first units went in 2008, one at a time. and how everyone was happy that they started to do things, and how then they started whining that everything collapsed because only ten aircraft of the same model are produced each year (fifty years a year of all models), they said that they did more in the USSR (in those days both the army and ours and the nats were 5 times larger).
      1. St Petrov
        St Petrov 31 October 2017 13: 16 New
        +4
        snot bred here since the forum. only nicknames change.
  3. alma
    alma 31 October 2017 13: 26 New
    +1
    Well, that’s it. Now the Democratic Democrats of Democracy can reasonably say that "these barbarians" surround their peaceful tank divisions in free Europe, and demand an increase in allocations to expand their presence.
  4. voyaka uh
    voyaka uh 31 October 2017 15: 46 New
    +1
    The question is what is the productivity of the plant per month.
    For previous articles and discussions at VO: 2 pieces per month.
    1. Rushnairfors
      Rushnairfors 31 October 2017 17: 58 New
      +2
      The question is, do we have enough such supplies for the planned re-equipment of the Air Force? The answer is ambiguous: yes and no. Why is that?
      1. Rushnairfors
        Rushnairfors 31 October 2017 18: 03 New
        +3
        First: why not enough? The answer is obvious - for a country such as the Russian army in 800 thousand. the person is not just small, but very small (fans of nuclear strikes, please do not disturb). Specifically, according to the Air Force, in Siberia, the Far East often removes between "live" airfields - about 700 km. Only as a result of the Serdyukov reforms was reduced about 35-40 !!!!! air garrisons (this is what my friends and I counted). And before that there was a reduction in the 90s and early 2000s. Therefore, of course, the strength of the Air Force certainly needs to be increased.
        1. Rushnairfors
          Rushnairfors 31 October 2017 18: 20 New
          +3
          Now I will answer why I consider the current pace of delivery of various aircraft to be very high. Of course, I'm sure that factories can produce more, but based on the above, is the point? Of the few parts that remained, but the DVs were practically all equipped with new equipment: Dzemgi and Uglovaya for su35, Sokolovka mig31bm, Chernigovka - ka52 and su25cm, Khabarovsk-mi8amtsh and there are an148, blast-su30cm, chemi8amtsh, on the way mi28, then to the west, too, everything is not bad - Kansk mig31bsm, shagol in terms of the next year to su34, West and south are also actively rearming - this is Millerovo and Krymsk and the aforementioned Besovets and Kursk. The turntables are also impressive. At the same time, we do not forget that in the listed regiments such aircraft as su27cm, su24m with hephaestos, and mig29cm are in service. All these aircraft underwent modernization, some underwent overhaul, their resource will last another 10 years minimum. And what their- cut? Stupid. In 2018-2019, mass production of mig35 is expected, while figures of the order of 80-100 units are voiced. Plus su57. After all, do you need to “shove” these planes somewhere in the garrisons? Therefore, before increasing the pace of production, it is necessary: ​​a) to restore the airfield network; b) Make up for the shortage of flight and engineering staff. And now, when all this is completed, it will be possible to increase the output of both Su30 and Su35 and Mig35 and Su34 to 50 aircraft of each type per year. In the meantime, and so good, no longer need
          1. voyaka uh
            voyaka uh 31 October 2017 19: 17 New
            0
            And you think the situation is normal when ten aircraft plants
            produce ten similar but different types of military aircraft in almost a single
            production? And each has its own engines, parts, equipment, pilots?
            Isn't it more logical to produce one type of aircraft at several plants
            parallel?
            1. not main
              not main 31 October 2017 20: 43 New
              0
              Quote: voyaka uh
              And you think the situation is normal when ten aircraft plants
              produce ten similar but different types of military aircraft in almost a single
              production? And each has its own engines, parts, equipment, pilots?

              I think so! Each aircraft has its own task. And to do something universal never led to anything! As an example, the same F-35, is not measured, but the result?
        2. Sergej1972
          Sergej1972 31 October 2017 22: 55 New
          0
          We officially have a force of more than 1 million troops, and not 800 thousand. Obviously, many mechanically summarize the number of three types of aircraft and do not take into account the Strategic Rocket Forces and Airborne Forces, as well as units not included in the types and separate branches of the armed forces.
          1. Rushnairfors
            Rushnairfors 1 November 2017 02: 42 New
            +1
            Obviously, many do not take into account the size of the RF Ministry of Defense.
            1. Sergej1972
              Sergej1972 2 November 2017 23: 36 New
              0
              Civilian personnel are separately accounted for. 1 million is precisely the number of military personnel. A little more than 1 million. Although in fact about 950 thousand, due to incomplete staffing. And GP is about 900 thousand people. That is, a total of 1 million 900 thousand military and civilian personnel.
    2. Victor-M
      Victor-M 31 October 2017 22: 21 New
      0
      Quote: voyaka uh
      The question is what is the productivity of the plant per month.
      For previous articles and discussions at VO: 2 pieces per month.

      Adequate productivity, and this after the “reforms” of the 90s by unfinished young reformers, under which they would probably release more now, fellow ------------------ fellow pans and pots. Russian slowly harnesses, but ... wink laughing
  5. Charik
    Charik 1 November 2017 13: 19 New
    0
    Baltimore Be !!!!! And to the light bulb who is there loud
  6. rocket757
    rocket757 1 November 2017 15: 07 New
    +3
    This is of course “guns instead of oil” ... but it’s not at all hot-ts to see above itself what has become of the “prosperous Western world” !!!
    In short NEA!
    Let there be guns.
    1. Ugolek
      Ugolek 1 November 2017 18: 36 New
      0
      And you think the situation is normal when ten aircraft plants
      produce ten similar but different types of military aircraft in almost a single
      production?


      Wait a minute, but the Su family surely has a large percentage of unification. Mig-31, he generally stands apart. The old groundwork of the Mig-29 and Su-24 types is worth it. Then, you probably know, there was an article here that we need a large number of specialists in the VKS, so the number of aircraft and helicopters will certainly increase.
      1. rocket757
        rocket757 1 November 2017 20: 22 New
        +3
        Unification is the dream of a deputy technician and supplier! Diversity, at the strategist’s dream ... and what is the industrialist’s dream?
        Everything is changing, moving forward so that the diversity of the military. those. inevitably ... or this or that manual fixated on unification, sooner or later appears WHERE ... guess what?