Military Review

Syrian MFA: Raqqa passed under US occupation

27
The Syrian Foreign Ministry spread the message that it does not consider Rakku destroyed by the American coalition liberated. The statement noted that the city of Raqqa is an occupied territory and will be considered liberated only after the transition under the full control of official Damascus.


Information Agency SANA cites the statement of the official representative of the main foreign policy department of the CAP:
Washington’s statements about the release of Raqqi are a lie to divert international attention from crime.


The release of the Syrian Ministry of Foreign Affairs noted that the coalition led by the United States subjected Raqqa to virtually carpet bombing, which led to the destruction of over 90% of buildings and structures, as well as major infrastructure facilities.

Syrian MFA: Raqqa passed under US occupation


Recall that Rakka was under the control of ISIS militants (* banned in the Russian Federation) from 2013 of the year. The city was declared the capital of the so-called “Islamic State (*).

In the Russian Ministry of Defense about the statements of the United States about the "release" of Raqqah, spoke as follows:
A coalition led by the US bombed Raqqu like Dresden in 1945. In the West, they are trying to quickly cover up the traces that under the ruins of Raqqah lie thousands of “civilians” “liberated” from ISIS (*).
Photos used:
http://www.globallookpress.com
27 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. 210ox
    210ox 30 October 2017 05: 53 New
    +4
    No one doubted who the true occupier and killer was!
  2. Mavrikiy
    Mavrikiy 30 October 2017 05: 54 New
    +4
    Syrian MFA: Raqqa passed under US occupation
    This is correct and declare to the UN.
    1. svp67
      svp67 30 October 2017 06: 06 New
      +5
      Quote: Mavrikiy
      This is correct and declare to the UN.

      Yes, they can write them at least every day, the sense of this will be "0" ... Not a single resolution will be passed through the UN Security Council on the charge of the United States.
  3. Wolka
    Wolka 30 October 2017 06: 01 New
    +3
    the Yankees need to strike such a blow, such a force that they think for a long time before poking their long nose where they are not at all pleased ...
    1. Mavrikiy
      Mavrikiy 30 October 2017 06: 13 New
      +1
      Quote: Volka
      the Yankees need to strike such a blow, such a force that they think for a long time before poking their long nose where they are not at all pleased ...

      But in the DPRK will get a bummer, and then in Syria.
      1. Wolka
        Wolka 30 October 2017 06: 19 New
        +2
        to strike at all does not mean militarily, the Yankees are masters of revolutions, it’s enough to lower their dollar, to foment ethnic and political contradictions within the country, this will turn them off for a long time in the international arena ... but this requires a certain consolidation of forces as in Europe, in Asia so on their mainland
        1. raw174
          raw174 30 October 2017 07: 25 New
          +2
          Quote: Volka
          that's enough to lower their dollar

          Their dollar, it’s like BE — all the dollars, if it collapses, the whole world economy will shake so that it doesn’t seem to everyone ... I think so.
    2. MadCat
      MadCat 30 October 2017 06: 14 New
      +3
      Quote: Volka
      the Yankees must strike such a blow, such a force

      well carry, do not splash only fool
      1. CT-55_11-9009
        CT-55_11-9009 30 October 2017 09: 50 New
        0
        Fluid strike? Ooooh, a water hammer is weight! In vain irony ...
  4. Herculesic
    Herculesic 30 October 2017 06: 08 New
    +3
    Washington or New York would be bombed so that there would be nothing left except ruins!
  5. Mikhail m
    Mikhail m 30 October 2017 06: 13 New
    +4
    It is unlikely that in the coming years the states will leave the occupied territories. And there is no one to pick them out of there.
    1. Lelek
      Lelek 30 October 2017 12: 53 New
      +2
      Quote: Michael m
      It is unlikely that in the coming years the states will leave the occupied territories


      Hey. This is so, the "nipple" system with a brazen twinkle in the eyes in action. And neither we nor Assad have an effective way to expel them from the territory of Syria (negotiations will lead to nothing, and forceful influence is a big war). The only opportunity is for the SAA to enter the borders with Iraq and Jordan and close the skies over the entire territory of Syria, but there are a lot of “BUT”. yes
      1. Nikolai Grek
        Nikolai Grek 31 October 2017 17: 35 New
        +4
        Quote: Lelek
        Quote: Michael m
        It is unlikely that in the coming years the states will leave the occupied territories


        Hey. This is so, the "nipple" system with a brazen twinkle in the eyes in action. And neither we nor Assad have an effective way to expel them from the territory of Syria (negotiations will lead to nothing, and forceful influence is a big war). The only opportunity is for the SAA to enter the borders with Iraq and Jordan and close the skies over the entire territory of Syria, but there are a lot of “BUT”. yes

        block them !!!
        1. Lelek
          Lelek 31 October 2017 19: 24 New
          +1
          Quote: Nikolai Grek
          block them !!!


          Hi, Nikolai.
          The former prime minister of Qatar recently voiced resentment in his voice about the plans for the dismemberment of Syria (USA, UAE, Turkey, Qatar, Israel). This "daredevil" will probably be buried soon.

          And here is the section map in our transcription
          1. Nikolai Grek
            Nikolai Grek 31 October 2017 23: 32 New
            +5
            Quote: Lelek
            And here is the section map in our transcription

            neaaaa, will not go like that !!! wink yes laughing laughing laughing
  6. LeftPers
    LeftPers 30 October 2017 06: 20 New
    +1
    Now we need to somehow dig out the pin-dosiks from there, they themselves will never leave.
    1. askort154
      askort154 30 October 2017 08: 03 New
      0
      [LeftPers ....... Now we need to somehow dig out the pin-dosiks from there, they themselves will never leave.

      That's for sure. If the Kurds are provided with a federation, they will "ask" the United States to leave its base on its territory, which will legitimize the presence of Americans in Syria. Now they are not there legally (with the entire fictitious, international "coalition"), referring to the fight against terrorism.
  7. smart ass
    smart ass 30 October 2017 06: 25 New
    +1
    We transfer the fighters of the Syrian army to Igilovites, create mobile groups, transfer the needles, reconnaissance data, let the Pasans wound planes and the United States wars are conducting a guerrilla war, Congress will definitely not like the corpses of American soldiers
    1. MadCat
      MadCat 30 October 2017 06: 43 New
      +2
      Quote: Clever man
      We transfer the fighters of the Syrian army to Igilovites

      in this case, the Syrian army will not last long. There every second in headquarters on a salary from the Americans.
      1. Krasnodar
        Krasnodar 30 October 2017 06: 45 New
        0
        Quote: MadCat
        Quote: Clever man
        We transfer the fighters of the Syrian army to Igilovites

        in this case, the Syrian army will not last long. There every second in headquarters on a salary from the Americans.

        And most likely, the amers, Israelis, the IG and the Turks at the same time. Everyone needs something, something interesting ...
  8. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 30 October 2017 07: 00 New
    0
    You can’t drive the Americans out of Syria with a stick until all of a sudden for some reason they decide to leave - which is unlikely. Therefore, direct clashes with the forces of the coalition led by the United States are not yet ruled out. The poor country is an additional confirmation that chaos, blood and devastation are going to go where the Americans go.
  9. pvv113
    pvv113 30 October 2017 07: 55 New
    +1
    Raqqa came under US occupation

    These tricks won't just go away. Europe occupied by states since 1945
  10. Sergei75
    Sergei75 30 October 2017 15: 17 New
    0
    It’s interesting that the Barmalei will be squeezed now, and then what will happen, the United States will leave, or remain in Syria, and what should we do then?
    1. Fedya2017
      Fedya2017 30 October 2017 20: 39 New
      0
      Quote: Sergei75
      It’s interesting that the Barmalei will be squeezed now, and then what will happen, the United States will leave, or remain in Syria, and what should we do then?

      It would be better for the Kremlin if the Americans stay there ... Otherwise, we will have to fight alone with the Kurds and other Islamists of Syria. And this will not end ... Assad will not be able to independently control the whole country. It would be better if Syria became divided, if Assad and the Alawites still have coastal territories. This is enough for us if we want to have our own military bases there. And the Alawites will be glad of this, because there are only 15% of them, and the Sunni majority will not want to be under their rule, as it was before ... This is the East, with its religious troubles ...
      1. Sergei75
        Sergei75 30 October 2017 20: 50 New
        0
        Americans are now holding the most oil-bearing territories and they don’t see much war there, I think for the sake of this, everything was started before.
        1. Fedya2017
          Fedya2017 30 October 2017 22: 52 New
          +1
          Quote: Sergei75
          Americans now hold the most oil-bearing territories

          Assad tried to persuade the Kurds to autonomy within Syria, but the Kurds seem to have refused ... Apparently they dream of a state. In fact, probably this is beneficial to Russia? Although the Kurds are pro-American, it would be a good shield from Iranian influence on Syria and its leadership. For example, in the Assad elite of power, pro-Iranian sentiments are very strong. After all, only Iranian Shiites recognize the Alawites for their own ... I think that there are some backstage agreements between the Kremlin and the amers. And even more so with Israel ...
  11. Fedya2017
    Fedya2017 30 October 2017 20: 23 New
    0
    What’s interesting is not what the Assad Foreign Ministry said, but the work of Russian propaganda ... Previously, the American coalition was reproached for not bombing the Ishilovites.