Siluanov: Russia is open for negotiations with Ukraine on a three-billion-dollar debt

75
Russia is open for negotiations with Ukraine on debt of $ 3 billion, reports RIA News Statement by Finance Minister Anton Siluanov.



We are open to negotiations with Ukrainian colleagues. The main condition is that we must repay the debt in full from Ukraine - 3 is a billion US dollars. And our conditions should be better than commercial lenders. We conduct such negotiations. I am confident that the proposals for Ukraine’s fulfillment of its obligations will be found,
the minister said on the Russia 1 channel.

“Ukraine’s sovereign Eurobonds on 3 billion dollars were placed in favor of the Russian Federation on non-market terms (with a coupon rate of 5% per annum) at the end of 2013 of the year. Until the end of 2015, Kiev regularly serviced the debt, but then defaulted on these bonds, ”the agency reminds.

Later, Kiev offered Moscow to restructure the debt on common terms with commercial lenders, but Russia insisted on the sovereign nature of the debt and offered a pre-trial solution to the issue. There was no counter-offer from the Ukrainian side, and the case was brought to court, and at the end of March this year, the High Court of London ordered Ukraine to pay the debt.

In July, the court specified the decision, specifying the full amount of the debt and penalty interest. He ordered Ukraine to pay the Russian Federation the nominal value of bonds in the amount of $ 3 billion purchased in 2013 at the expense of the NWF funds, the amount of unfulfilled coupon payment in the amount of $ 75 million, as well as penalty interest accrued on these amounts (every day the delay costs Kiev in $ 673 thousand.).

In addition, the High Court ordered Kiev to reimburse Moscow for a part of the costs related to the court proceedings in the amount of 2,8 million pounds sterling.

In September, Ukraine executed a resolution on compensation for a part of the legal costs incurred by the Russian side, transferring 1,16 million pounds sterling.
  • http://www.globallookpress.com
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

75 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +7
    29 October 2017 18: 30
    What to talk about?
    These comrades do not want and cannot repay debt.
    The default on sovereign debt is not recognized either by the Ukrainians themselves or by international regulators who do not want to do this. In order not to sit in a puddle with his policy.
    With whom and how to charge a debt?
    Do you agree with the IMF to issue a loan specifically for payment? It is unlikely.....
    1. +13
      29 October 2017 18: 32
      What are the negotiations? What about? ... Let them pay and sleep peacefully .... smile... you damn still forgive him the Nazis, you will become ...
      1. +6
        29 October 2017 18: 55
        I think that so far we will not pinch the instigators in the grip of Faberge, there will be no return. It is perfectly true that they don’t want anything .. They’re not sick and they’re not in one bottle.
        Quote: Black
        What are the negotiations? What about? ... Let them pay and sleep peacefully .... smile... you damn still forgive him the Nazis, you will become ...
        1. +3
          29 October 2017 22: 25
          "We are open for negotiations, the main condition is to repay the debt"
          Hmm ... In negotiations with the current government in Kiev, only black humor saves.
          am
          1. +1
            30 October 2017 08: 34
            Give the sausage back - I'll forgive everything
      2. +2
        29 October 2017 18: 58
        With toothless cowards no one will negotiate.
        1. +1
          29 October 2017 19: 29
          Let them reel, every day the debt only grows
        2. +1
          29 October 2017 19: 39
          Sorry, but who are you talking about now?
          1. +1
            29 October 2017 20: 13
            About Siluanov, about whom else? ....
      3. +10
        29 October 2017 19: 00
        Quote: Black
        s damn still forgive him for the Nazis, you will become ...

        no, there is no need to forgive - take away the territory - DNI + LC, and that's it request
        1. +12
          29 October 2017 19: 23
          LDNR and so ours. let them give Odessa to Nikolaev.
        2. +5
          29 October 2017 23: 31
          Quote: Partyzan
          no, there is no need to forgive - take away the territory - DNI + LC, and that's it

          negative negative negative Territories "take away" in referenda and without any compensation !!! wassat wassat tongue tongue good good good laughing laughing laughing
      4. 0
        29 October 2017 19: 26
        Quote: Black
        What are the negotiations? About what?.

        Thieves do not pay debts, but only increase! This is their essence!
    2. +18
      29 October 2017 18: 52
      Someone please give Siluanov a slipper on the head.
      1. +5
        29 October 2017 18: 58
        Quote: Black_Jacket
        Someone please give Siluanov a slipper on the head.

        Slipper does not help, I am surprised at the naivete of some officials. How can a dialogue be conducted if the other side is not participating in it?
        1. +3
          29 October 2017 19: 07
          How can a dialogue be conducted if the other side is not participating in it?

          You did not watch the movie "Taxi Driver" with the young Robert De Niro in the title role, otherwise you would not ask such a question)
        2. +5
          29 October 2017 20: 27
          Quote: Pirogov
          How can a dialogue be conducted if the other side is not participating in it?

          Do you offer to break all contacts? break not build
          1. +1
            29 October 2017 21: 59
            Quote: LSA57
            Do you offer to break all contacts? break not build

            In my opinion, I did not offer anything, but expressed my point of view. You can’t argue with not building it, but don’t you think that Kiev has broken everything for a long time?
        3. +5
          29 October 2017 23: 34
          Quote: Pirogov
          Slipper does not help, I am surprised at the naivete of some officials. How can a dialogue be conducted if the other side is not participating in it?

          all this canoe due to the fact that Vova constantly repeats the Ukrainians like our brotherly people !!! negative negative negative laughing laughing laughing all hohland holds and exists solely because of Putin’s extremely positive attitude towards the housekeepers !!! wassat wassat wassat
      2. +1
        29 October 2017 19: 00
        A pimpled galoshes is prettier ...
      3. 0
        29 October 2017 20: 55
        Quote: Black_Jacket
        Someone please give Siluanov a slipper on the head.

        Yes, not a slipper! Let him get his money in vain after receiving debt from Ukraine! And then
        We are open to negotiations with Ukrainian colleagues. The main condition is that we must repay the debt from Ukraine in full - this is 3 billion US dollars. And our conditions should be better than that of commercial lenders. We are conducting such negotiations.
        conditions should be better for him than for merchants! This is sitting on the vain board of the Minister of Finance !!!
    3. +3
      29 October 2017 18: 58
      Quote: Machete
      These comrades do not want and cannot repay debt

      "Professor's question to the student audience:
      - What is the name of the one who wants but cannot?
      Audience Chorus:
      - Impotent !!!
      “But what about the one who can, but does not want?”
      Silence ... And from the very back of the desk a female contemptuous voice:
      - Yes, to .... (domestic horned animal, male) he, to .... (it is)
      1. +6
        29 October 2017 20: 29
        Quote: Rurikovich
        Silence ... And from the very back of the desk a female contemptuous voice:
        - Yes, to .... (domestic horned animal, male) he, to .... (it is)

        option 2, only whiny voice
        -Yes he is a bastard .... just a bastard ...
        1. +1
          29 October 2017 23: 36
          Quote: LSA57
          Yes, he is a bastard .... just a bastard ..


          Or a sadist.
    4. 0
      29 October 2017 19: 34
      "Faithful foot soldier", or as they say banderlog "chain dog" Putin to send there - will receive a favor, along with Mosiychuk's hog will visit in the hospital hi
      1. 0
        29 October 2017 20: 12
        Quote: Machete
        What to talk about?
        These comrades do not want and cannot repay debt.
        So you need to recover this money from those who gave them a loan.
        Or Yanukovych give them for this amount.
        1. +1
          29 October 2017 20: 21
          It’s interesting how, to Ukraine at 5%, and recently, I saw such an advertisement) a loan without intrigue is only 11,99% per annum for the entire duration of the loan))))))
          1. 0
            29 October 2017 20: 24
            Quote: INTER
            It’s interesting how, to Ukraine at 5%, and recently, I saw such an advertisement) a loan without intrigue is only 11,99% per annum for the entire duration of the loan))))))

            So it was not a loan, but a bribe, so that they would not be associated with Europe. In total, they had to get over 15 billion, they slowed down the program in time, when everything was clear in Kiev and the Crimea laid a stone on our relations and Novorossia.
    5. 0
      29 October 2017 22: 40
      In fact, more than 20 billion in gold and foreign exchange reserves have been stacked up. It may well mean.
  2. 0
    29 October 2017 18: 34
    They even pressed us quietly somewhere again, since the minister opened such a bazaar (he doesn’t express his personal opinion), and you see, our Great Khokhlov will write him off next year ....
    1. 0
      29 October 2017 19: 32
      Quote: Kent0001
      Chet us again quietly pressed somewhere,

      Could press much earlier, but now the train is gone! Their desire to squeeze the oligarchs, AU-knet on the contributions of the SGA, although no one talks about it!
  3. +2
    29 October 2017 18: 39
    Something seems to me that Siluanov is another candidate for dismissal? From the cabinet - the weakest. And all the time something is broadcasting out of place. She does not feel the “moment” at all.
    1. +1
      29 October 2017 19: 38
      Quote: Mountain Shooter
      Something seems to me that Siluanov is another candidate for dismissal? From the cabinet - the weakest. And all the time something is broadcasting out of place. She does not feel the “moment” at all.

      But should the Minister really feel the moment and be for the sake of the situation? The one who feels is a footcloth, but acting in the interests of the country, contrary to that - Well done!
  4. +8
    29 October 2017 18: 40
    As I understand it, they attributed it to unforeseen losses ... and now they are just demonstrating body movements ...
    1. +3
      29 October 2017 19: 32
      Quote: Masya Masya
      that was attributed to unforeseen losses ...

      Money is insured, that’s the brain of people soaring .... England is playing with this sovereign debt, so to speak, holding its trump card up against Moscow, but it knows that insurers will pay ... laughing.... they are maniacs, they will kill slowly ....
    2. +4
      29 October 2017 19: 54
      I remember then Dvorkovich assured everyone that the loan repayment is reliable and guaranteed by English law. He then oversaw this loan. It is necessary to remove from his underwear and tear off one organ. Or let him compensate for the damage from his income.
    3. +7
      29 October 2017 20: 31
      Quote: Masya Masya
      I understand that attributed to unforeseen losses ..

      nothing was written off. they don’t owe it to us anymore, to the British. and they will knock out
      1. +6
        29 October 2017 20: 38
        Quote: LSA57
        they don’t owe it to us anymore, to the British. and they will knock out

        Well then, it turns out we sold the debt? Are shavers collectors? I'll think about it tomorrow ...

        To work, work and work, as the great Lenin bequeathed and the Communist Party of the Soviet Union teaches! wink
        1. +6
          29 October 2017 20: 55
          Quote: Masya Masya
          Well then, it turns out we sold the debt?

          they didn’t sell anything to anyone. the British were guarantors. under their guarantee, the debt was given
  5. +5
    29 October 2017 18: 44
    Russia is open for negotiations on debt, only the Khokhlostan is a tin can, to which there is no clue.
    1. +4
      29 October 2017 20: 01
      Why tin can key? It is enough to rub on a flat surface of stone or brick.
      1. +5
        29 October 2017 20: 45
        Therefore, they are still vomiting and returning 3 billion dollars and does not smell.
  6. +3
    29 October 2017 18: 44
    If Siluanov does not return the debt from Ukraine within a month, send him to resign!
    1. +5
      29 October 2017 20: 33
      Quote: Alexander War
      If Siluanov does not return the debt from Ukraine within a month, send him to resign!

      about how. why a month, and not a half, or two. or a week? go to war with them, but return it? they won’t be able to return the whole Crimea
  7. +4
    29 October 2017 18: 50
    Suppose Russia is ready, is Ukraine ready? The big question. Ukraine will say for example, you pressed the Crimean peninsula to take it? In Donetsk, trouble began, as a result, the region is not here and there. So the granulation will go at the expense of contractual measures.
    Of course, this is not patriotic, but closer to the truth. And the truth is, I prefer to look in the eye.
    1. 0
      29 October 2017 19: 44
      Quote: Petrol cutter
      . So the granulation will go at the expense of contractual measures.

      Ukraine must return money for the operation of the Crimean Peninsula for all years! (After Khrushchev’s gift). But even more serious, then “THIS IS AN UNLAWFUL EDUCATION” (ukrokhunta) cannot even “think”!
    2. 0
      29 October 2017 20: 00
      Not only Crimea with its inhabitants. Okay, they voted and entered Russia. Although in a referendum in Sevastopol in 1991 or 1992, more than half voted for entering Ukraine (according to the memoirs of the former commander of the Black Sea Fleet of the USSR). But after all, private property was stolen, which went to Russia for free! For example, offshore drilling platforms of 2 pieces, for which Ukraine paid China half a billion dollars! And this is a very serious sin - an attempt on property. And it is clear on whose side the international court will be.
      1. +1
        29 October 2017 23: 58
        And this is a very serious sin - an attempt on property.


        After Yugoslavia, Libya, Iraq talk about the attempt on "private property"? laughing
        And it is clear on whose side the international court will be.

        Yes, be in the Russian Federation all saints and with wings, all the same, the "court" will not be on our side.
  8. +1
    29 October 2017 19: 12
    Russia is perhaps the only country that forgives everyone their debts .... In this case, there are officials who "lost .. state money", there is a living Yanukovych, there is a nosy government optimist-lawyer with a "count" name .... Let them pay. am
    1. 0
      29 October 2017 19: 24
      You offer the EU to buy Yanukovych for 3 billion.
    2. +2
      29 October 2017 19: 30
      Quote: samarin1969
      Russia is perhaps the only country that forgives everyone its debts

      So it is for everyone - and for their own citizens? ... recourse
  9. +3
    29 October 2017 19: 26
    add video
  10. The comment was deleted.
    1. 0
      29 October 2017 20: 03
      astronomical sums to voice this one thing and prove in court a completely different thing, it will last more than one year
  11. +4
    29 October 2017 19: 44
    Win-win situation. The brains of the people soar that they want to repay the debt, only Ukraine does not return. Or maybe it was easier to fail to repay Ukrainian debts and fulfill their own May decrees, so it's time to retire. Do not remind me of the 90s. I have lived before, and I know Russian history. So that someone dares not to repay the debt and laugh, but this is only possible with the permission of the Kremlin.
    1. +7
      29 October 2017 19: 57
      Quote: Gardamir
      So that someone dares not to repay the debt and laugh, yes this is only possible with the permission of the Kremlin

      The debts that the Russian Federation wrote off to the DPRK, Cuba, and others, arose under the USSR.
      Does your phrase mean that even in Soviet times, pests lived in the Kremlin who deliberately squandered folk remedies?
      Thanks in advance for the detailed answer. wink
      1. +2
        29 October 2017 20: 32
        , arose during the USSR.
        It’s good that there is internet. And some events are stored for a long time. Before each presidential election, present-day Russia repaid "the entire" debt of the USSR. Before the two elections for sure. What is this duty? Has anyone delved into it? By the way, the Union paid for "help" during the war. And another interesting thing, Russia either pays debts or forgives. But literally this week, the president was excited that it turns out there are wage arrears. But the "dashing" 90s are long over. But why doesn’t anyone forgive, the citizens of Russia have neither debts on housing and communal services, nor debts to banks. By the way, the Kremlin supports banks, otherwise God forbid the invisible hand of the market will bankrupt the people and there will be no one to rip people off.
        1. +8
          29 October 2017 20: 42
          Quote: Gardamir
          Gardamir

          Quote: Golovan Jack
          thanks for the detailed answer

          But you, Gardamiranswered the wrong question (s)
          However, as usual request
          Quote: Gardamir
          What is this duty? Has anyone delved into it?

          Duc delve into ... then tell us all, and we will give you plus points ... honestly. After all, say yourself -
          Quote: Gardamir
          there is internet. And some events are stored for a long time

          About the state debt of the Russian Federation - it is definitely "stored", do not be so kind as to doubt it.
          Quote: Gardamir
          why no one forgives, the citizens of Russia neither debts on housing and communal services, nor debts to banks

          To school ... to the garden. Find out for yourself (for starters) why the "bad debts" of other states are generally written off.
          Wet dreams of a freebie ("here I get loans, and the state will pay for me") are understandable, but for this - in a fairy tale.
          Quote: Gardamir
          By the way, the Kremlin supports banks, otherwise God forbid the invisible hand of the market will bankrupt the people and there will be no one to rip people off

          You have an "offended complex", Gardamir. I don’t remember what it is called by science, but this is a disease, it must be treated. So far (and if) it is not too late.
          1. +4
            29 October 2017 21: 13
            Quote: Golovan Jack
            To school ... to the garden. Find out for yourself (for starters) why the "bad debts" of other states are generally written off.

            It is not necessary to confuse concepts and mislead others. There is the concept of "bad debt", it is the debt of an individual who has lost income and the opportunity to receive income in the future (disability, death) or the debt of a bankrupt legal entity. The concept of bad debt of a state does not exist as long as this state exists, this concept is a fiction of unscrupulous officials and economists. In the 50s, China “seemed” to be a state incapable of paying its debts NEVER, but “only” 50 years have passed and China can buy 3/4 of the states of the planet with giblets. But many debts were written off to China.
            1. +7
              29 October 2017 21: 49
              Quote: E_V_N
              The concept of bad debt of a state does not exist as long as this state exists, this concept is a fiction of unscrupulous officials and economists ...

              Are you an official or an economist? Conscientious?
              Anyway. Suppose I agreed with you, and the debt, for example, of Cuba (or DPRK) to the Russian Federation ... is not hopeless. And now what?
              These countries are stupidly unable to repay this debt. To bend them a la collection agency of a negligent debtor is counterproductive, they still have to work and work.
              Your suggestions?
              Quote: E_V_N
              Do not confuse concepts yourself and mislead others

              If you are so smart - enlighten me, a dark ignoramus ... it can turn out quite interestingly wink
      2. +2
        29 October 2017 21: 05
        Quote: Golovan Jack
        Quote: Gardamir
        So that someone dares not to repay the debt and laugh, yes this is only possible with the permission of the Kremlin

        The debts that the Russian Federation wrote off to the DPRK, Cuba, and others, arose under the USSR.
        Does your phrase mean that even in Soviet times, pests lived in the Kremlin who deliberately squandered folk remedies?
        Thanks in advance for the detailed answer. wink

        So you contradict yourself, it is not the USSR that wrote off the debts, but the officials of the Russian Federation. Yes, the debt arose under the USSR, but the heir of the Russian Federation wrote off (refused to recover), do you feel the difference?
        1. +7
          29 October 2017 21: 43
          Quote: E_V_N
          So you contradict yourself

          Never low fellow
          Quote: E_V_N
          Yes, debt arose under the USSR

          Moreover, even then it was clear that no one would ever repay this debt Yes
          Quote: E_V_N
          feel the difference?

          I feel the troll ...
          Quote: E_V_N
          But the fact that GDP in the economy is not ice is unambiguous. To create an agglomeration from Moscow where 1/5 of the total population lives while eliminating all production there, but at the same time, salaries and pensions are 3 times higher than the national average ...

          - Does 28 million people live in Moscow? Are you in your mind?
          - in Moscow, "all production is eliminated"? Oh well ...
          Quote: E_V_N
          at the same time, salaries and pensions are 3 times higher than the national average

          - about pensions - not in the subject, salaries - well, definitely not "at three" ... I myself work in Moscow, if it is ...
          Quote: E_V_N
          that is, in Moscow for the same work they receive times as much as in Mukhosk ...

          - Duc, this ... who is holding you? Go to Moscow, get more ... "for the same work", yeah ... if you can, of course laughing
          In short ... to the garden, to the garden ...
    2. +6
      29 October 2017 21: 55
      Quote: Gardamir
      The brains of the people soar that they want to repay the debt, only Ukraine does not return.

      iron logic!!!! urkaina returned the debt, but it hid the GDP !!!! so it seems they say bluntly, they couldn’t return it, urkain does not give. or are you few court decisions?
      1. 0
        30 October 2017 08: 53
        urkain does not give. or are you few court decisions?
        While Putin calls Poroshenko a legitimate president, Ukraine will not give anything back. We need deeds and not words.
        1. +8
          30 October 2017 15: 43
          Quote: Gardamir
          While Putin calls Poroshenko a legitimate president, Ukraine will not give anything back

          "Legitimate", in translation into the generally understood, is "convicted of the trust of the people." Formally, Poroshenko is just that - the presidential election took place, and he won them.
          Please tell me (and Putin) how the president of one country should call the president of another.
          Also, if Mona, explain how what Putin calls Poroshenko legitimate is due to the fact that Ukraine does not repay debts?
          Thanks in advance for the detailed and to the point answer laughing
          1. 0
            30 October 2017 23: 10
            Quote: Golovan Jack
            Formally, Poroshenko is just that - the presidential election took place, and he won them

            Get fucked up. I can also win the election like that. Put together a gang, start a civil war, and then hold elections in the territory controlled by my gang. And I will have more than "59% of those who voted." Formally.
            1. +8
              30 October 2017 23: 37
              Quote: Shurik70
              Get fucked up. I can win the election too

              You cannot, otherwise you would have won.
              And you will not succeed in finding fault with what I have written - everything is right there request
              Was there an election? Yes they were. Observers from the most-most democratic countries in the world confirmed the "purity" of the election? Yes, they did.
              I wonder what would you do in place of GDP? Would you like to prove with your horn that everything is fraudulent and that everything is wrong? Well, you would fall into world-class jesters. Immediately, moreover.
              There are game rules, and they have to be followed. At least from time to time. Yes
              1. 0
                31 October 2017 08: 23
                There are game rules
                Crimea for some reason did not enter the rules of the game.
          2. 0
            31 October 2017 08: 22
            "Legitimate", in translation into the generally understood, is "convicted of the trust of the people"
            And in Russian, what is it really disgusting to say? Legal - not legal. Well, if you’re so ugly, answer me, I’ve been asking for three years, where did the word patriot go? A year before the Olympics, as snapped.
  12. 0
    29 October 2017 19: 48
    Let the Ministry of Finance calm down and forgive. All the same, they will not give even by court order
    1. 0
      29 October 2017 20: 01
      If you don’t give it back even by a court decision, then you can quite legally arrest their property for this amount, you will have to give it anyway.
  13. 0
    29 October 2017 20: 19
    You are open, and they need it? Why lend, knowing that they will not return? Or maybe you need something like this, gogol - the mogul of the director of the FSB to work?
  14. +2
    30 October 2017 06: 13
    Siluanov again! Save me from him, comrades.

    I know that he "open"for everything - I suspect that even for things that are severely condemned in the Bible (see Sodom) laughing

    But I’m not open! Give the Russian pensioners the money that Putin - in my opinion in vain! - gave a loan to Yanukovych! No negotiation! Just give it back!
  15. +2
    30 October 2017 10: 59
    As long as such “brothers” of Ukraine as Putin and Co. are in power in Russia, of course nothing will be given. With a bunch of crap, called "ukryayinya", lying on the threshold of Russia and constantly spoiling in her direction, you can only talk from a position of strength - for example: 1. Enter the Russian troops in the Kharkov region, which by the way before the revolution was part of Russia, 2. To prohibit Ukrainian vessels from passing through the Kerch Strait into the Sea of ​​Azov, now this is not difficult given Russia's control of the Tuzla Island and the Kerch Strait. And then you can talk about the return of debt. But is the Russian government capable of a courageous act? Unfortunately, it is only capable of cowardly concern. And as you know, they don’t give back to cowards, they forgive them ...
  16. 0
    30 October 2017 11: 27
    This idiotic Mr. Siluanov, even agree with his colleagues when the bandits come to him to take his apartment or cottage, with his traditional position as a passive homosexual, his place is where Yulukaeva is. Mark my words, also finish.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"