SANA: Terrorists keep chemical weapons in Idlib

30
Formations of the group “Dzhebhat al-Nusra” (banned in the Russian Federation) have a chemical weaponswhich is stored in warehouses in the village of Maareth Masrin in 9 km north of Idlib (320 km from Damascus), reports TASS message agency SANA.



According to agency sources, the militants in Idlib are capable of producing artisanal chemical munitions. The range of such projectiles launched from rocket launchers is 15 km.

Eyewitnesses also said that the second warehouse with toxic gases is located in the village of Guzl.

According to the agency, the information received from the sources convincingly proves the involvement of “al-Nusra” and its associated formations in criminal attacks with the use of chemical weapons in the north of Syria.

The agency recalls that the shells with toxic substances used in 2016 in Aleppo extremist groups "Brigade of Nureddin Zengi" and "Ahrar ash-Sham", which Washington refers to a moderate armed opposition.

On Friday, Damascus condemned the report of the UN Joint Mechanism and the OPCW on investigating the use of chemical munitions in Syria. As stated in the statement by the SAR Ministry of Foreign Affairs, "Syria considers the report of the OPCW-UN unacceptable in form and content."

“This document was drafted at the direction of the United States and Western countries with the aim of exerting political pressure on Syria and putting new aggressive threats against it,” the foreign ministry said in a statement.

In a report by the UN-OPCW, the responsibility for the sarin attack in Khan Sheikhun 4 on April 2017 was laid on the Syrian authorities, and on the attack on “using sulfur mustard” in the village of Maaret Umm Hosh on September 16 on September - on the terrorist IG grouping (banned in the Russian Federation).
  • http://www.globallookpress.com
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

30 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +7
    29 October 2017 16: 44
    This is a new way to "eliminate chemical weapons" to fellow workers .. And cheaply and angrily ..
    1. +14
      29 October 2017 16: 53
      Dmitry, not new.
      Only! Yes
      1. +7
        29 October 2017 16: 56
        Sash, not the "only", but simply "verified." Yes
        1. +10
          29 October 2017 16: 59
          Well, if not the only one? In another way, they simply do not dispose of it ... In general! They said that they would only begin in the twenties ... But they started earlier belay
          1. +7
            29 October 2017 17: 01
            Believe on the word USA - become like a donkey! negative This is what their "allies" understand ...
            1. +1
              29 October 2017 18: 18
              Quote: Jedi
              This is what their "allies" understand ...

              They understand and continue to believe. And in their media, and at the official level request
              Language dares to tell the truth (and even a hint) when the prefix "ex-" appears lol feel
              1. +5
                29 October 2017 18: 21
                hi There is such, I do not argue. Apparently, while you are "acting" - corporate ethics does not order to fuss about how the US is waving. Yet "independent and democratic." wink
          2. +3
            29 October 2017 18: 21
            But in our "three jumps" chemistry they persuaded weapons .. We sacredly honor international agreements. Only these agreements often "hegimon" spits ..
            Quote: Logall
            Well, if not the only one? In another way, they simply do not dispose of it ... In general! They said that they would only begin in the twenties ... But they started earlier belay
            1. +2
              29 October 2017 18: 49
              Quote: 210ox
              But in our "three jumps" chemistry they persuaded weapons .. We sacredly honor international agreements. Only these agreements often "hegimon" spits ..

              Oh well. God forbid such an arsenal of babahnet in our territory. It’s better for them to sniff some kind of rocket on their territory to smell. And so we have built several factories under this business, which are now switching to civilian products and providing thousands of jobs and budget revenues. In short, there are pluses too ...
              1. 0
                30 October 2017 06: 02
                ..this is a weapon of the past and is not nearly selective .., any sects can use it .. - it doesn’t need ..
            2. +4
              29 October 2017 23: 55
              Quote: 210ox
              But we have persuaded weapons in the "three jumps" of chemistry.

              we have a "nuclear" substitute !! wassat wassat lol lol good good
        2. +3
          29 October 2017 17: 14
          Quote: Jedi
          Dmitry, not new.
          Only!
          Logall
          1 Jedi Today, 16:56 ↑ New
          Sash, not the "only", but simply "verified."

          Universal! No need to bother with technology and the construction of processing plants! And blame the whole world for all their sins, and impose sanctions against the objectionable!
          1. +4
            29 October 2017 18: 06
            Quote: Tol100v
            No need to bother with technology and the construction of processing plants! And blame the whole world for all their sins, and impose sanctions against the objectionable!

            I meant it, I was just too lazy to develop my thought. feel Which does not detract from your merits in the above thought development. good
  2. +5
    29 October 2017 16: 56
    Yes, most of us never believed that CAA uses OM. After all, it was the SGA that was engaged in the destruction of Syrian air forces after the signing of its destruction and control by the OPCW. So what? According to them, it turns out they lied to the international community that OMs were destroyed. And how now to trust poor Europeans and other citizens of these organizations! Again "test tubes !? am
    1. +5
      29 October 2017 17: 42
      Quote: Vlad5307
      They didn’t lie to the international community that OMs were destroyed.

      return the nobel, or already shared?
  3. 0
    29 October 2017 16: 57
    And who put it to them?
  4. +4
    29 October 2017 17: 35
    Storage locations are known. So, what is next?
    1. +1
      29 October 2017 18: 23
      Nothing... request If you try to destroy it, the West will scream that Assad is destroying the civilian population with chemical weapons. Do nothing - after a while they (the barmalei) will strike with chemical weapons and the West will scream that Assad destroys the civilian population with the same chemical weapons Yes
      Vicious circle request
  5. +5
    29 October 2017 17: 50
    And the casket just opened. Mattress-carriers deliver chemical weapons to Al-Nusra, the barmalei shake their tubes, and Assad is guilty as always.
  6. 0
    29 October 2017 18: 20
    Terrorists have chemical weapons stored in warehouses in the village (320 km from Damascus). Militants are capable of producing artisanal chemical munitions. The range of such shells launched from rocket launchers is 15 km.




    1. 0
      29 October 2017 23: 07
      Coca-Cola for the Russian market is produced on the territory of the Russian Federation, and taxes are paid to the budget of the Russian Federation. it turns out and Russia is to blame for what is drawn?
  7. +3
    29 October 2017 18: 23
    Here an interesting article Qatar reveals the dirty secrets of the war in Syria https://diana-mihailova.livejournal.com/1169525.h
    tml
    1. +3
      29 October 2017 18: 24
      https://nortwolf-sam.livejournal.com/2085494.html сша со своей "демократией"
  8. 0
    29 October 2017 19: 01
    According to the agency, the information received from sources convincingly proves the involvement of Al-Nusra and its associated groups in criminal attacks using chemical weapons in northern Syria.
    And where are the "fair" and "democratic" Tomahawks of the United States for the notorious chemical terrorists and scum "nosrachs" ????
  9. +3
    29 October 2017 19: 12
    There is no doubt that chemical weapons were delivered to the Syrian bandits by their sponsors from the USA of the countries of Europe in Israel and the “black monarchies” Bashar simply does not need it and he would not use it in any case against his own people.
    1. 0
      29 October 2017 21: 05
      Quote: quilted jacket
      There is no doubt that chemical weapons were delivered to the Syrian bandits by their sponsors from the USA of the countries of Europe in Israel and the “black monarchies” Bashar simply does not need it and he would not use it in any case against his own people.

      No doubt this is a good argument)))
      In addition, he could mow his population with conventional weapons, but chemistry in any way?
      1. 0
        30 October 2017 07: 01
        you are a Russian-speaking creature and Poroshenko with phosphorus bombs and tactical missiles in European cities in the Donbass do not touch you ??? Rabinovich, you ours with a brush ..
        1. 0
          30 October 2017 11: 12
          Quote: anjey
          Rabinovich, you ours with a brush ..

          So is this the next reincarnation of Rabinovich?
          I’m either watching a child or just lol
          1. 0
            30 October 2017 12: 07
            Rabinovich is a ten-headed troll-hydra, Hercules is not enough for him ...
            1. 0
              30 October 2017 12: 09
              Quote: anjey
              Rabinovich is a ten-headed hydra media

              That's right.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"