Military Review

Mattis - Pyongyang: Make no mistake, we will win you anyway

91
Another belligerent statement was made by US Secretary of Defense James Mattis regarding the DPRK. While in Seoul, where US President Donald Trump plans to arrive in a few days, Mattis said that any strike by North Korea would be repelled.


Pentagon chief indirectly appealed to the authorities of the DPRK with the following speech:
Do not make a mistake! Any attack on the United States or on the allies of the United States will be repulsed. Any use of nuclear weapons against us will lead to a massive military response. This will be an effective and winning action!


Against this background, an article appears in the Business Insider publication devoted to the report of the ex-employees of the Congress Special Commission on Electromagnetic Pulsed Weapons. The article (and the report) quite seriously announces that, allegedly, Pyongyang is armed with "a bomb capable of almost completely destroying the US population with an electromagnetic pulse." Such a saying belongs to American experts Peter Pray and William Graham.

There is only one conclusion from this horror story: someone in the United States really wants an additional allocation of funds from the budget for "confronting the North Korean threat." It was nuclear, and now also “electromagnetic impulse”. Will it come to foil hats?

Mattis - Pyongyang: Make no mistake, we will win you anyway


During a visit to South Korea, Mattis was shown the territory of the DPRK, "from which comes a direct threat."
Photos used:
http://www.globallookpress.com
91 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. oleg-gr
    oleg-gr 28 October 2017 08: 50 New
    0
    All applications are designed to allocate additional money from the budget. He fulfills lobbyists' fees.
    1. MIKHA-M
      MIKHA-M 28 October 2017 08: 56 New
      10
      Late gentlemen scare North Korea and Russia ... Now you have to reckon with Eun
      Remember the words of Putin (turned to the west) a long time ago in Munich: "You still can not imagine what you have done .."
      But everything turned out ..!
      1. Nyrobsky
        Nyrobsky 28 October 2017 10: 23 New
        +1
        Quote: MIHA-M
        Remember the words of Putin (turned to the west) a long time ago in Munich: "You still can not imagine what you have done .."

        Putin said these words a couple of years ago at the UN General Assembly in the form of a question: - "Do you have any idea what you have done?"
      2. xetai9977
        xetai9977 28 October 2017 10: 28 New
        +9
        I do not understand those who write stinging comments. And what wrong did Mattis say? Do not win? How did this Eun deserve praise for the site members? Its adequacy? Or that. what put the region on the brink of war? You think that’s good. when will a nuclear mushroom grow in the Far East?
        1. NIKNN
          NIKNN 28 October 2017 11: 33 New
          14
          Quote: xetai9977
          How did this Eun deserve praise for the site members? ........ You think it's good. when will a nuclear mushroom grow in the Far East ?.

          Do you think it is good to be lawless slaves of narcissistic idiots? I am a nuclear mushroom in the Far East VERY and VERY unlikely (it’s just 100% guaranteed neither when, nor what can be), and if this happens in the region (not only in the Far East), believe me, it will not be due to Un's fault ... hi
        2. OFFICE-32
          OFFICE-32 28 October 2017 12: 57 New
          +9
          Quote: xetai9977
          I do not understand those who write stinging comments. And what wrong did Mattis say? Do not win? How did this Eun deserve praise for the site members? Its adequacy? Or that. what put the region on the brink of war? You think that’s good. when will a nuclear mushroom grow in the Far East?

          Well, I’ll just answer you that way ... DPRK for the USA, as for you Armenia, only everything is more complicated! soldier
          DPRK wants to be left behind with its democracy .. Or it smells!
          That's all!
        3. Weyland
          Weyland 28 October 2017 20: 03 New
          +2
          Quote: xetai9977
          And what wrong did Mattis say? Do not win?

          "The purpose of the war is peace under conditions most comfortable for the victor" (Clausewitz)
          Regardless of what remains of the DPRK - if at least one atomic bomb explodes in the United States, it will not be a victory for the United States!
        4. Grits
          Grits 29 October 2017 11: 16 New
          +3
          I do not understand those who write stinging comments. And what wrong did Mattis say? Do not win? How did this Eun deserve praise for the site members? Its adequacy? Or that. what put the region on the brink of war? You think that’s good. when will a nuclear mushroom grow in the Far East?
          The United States is putting the world on the brink of nuclear wonders. Do not touch Eun and he will lag behind you. The Americans, of course, will win. They’ll just wipe out the whole of Korea from the face of the earth. You just compare the territory, population and military power of the DPRK and the United States. The difference is the greatest. The only difference is that Koreans are ready to die for their country at least completely. But are American homosexuals ready to die under Korean missiles? I think there are no fools. They all want to eat fat and sleep soundly. Just a couple of Korean missiles that fell on the territory of effeminate Americans will be enough to cause chaos there, incomparable with all their Katrina and other typhoons. In short, the Americans will devour each other, the blacks will begin to wet everyone who got in the fight for grub. And Latinos cut a white throat for a can of gasoline. That is America. And all at once forget the vaunted American patriotism and the striped flag
          1. Talgat
            Talgat 29 October 2017 20: 24 New
            0
            I wanted to add that this conflict has a long history

            it's pure xnumx% geopolitics

            This is the confrontation between Russia and China against the United States

            So began that Korean war 1953 of the year

            And now when Russia is still knocked down and China is still not ripe - the United States has a good chance to turn everything in its direction

            And all these snot that the DPRK is bad and frightening with a mushroom is from the evil one. There are no good and bad - there are interests of superpowers
        5. kos2910
          kos2910 30 October 2017 06: 49 New
          0
          Quote: xetai9977
          And what wrong did Mattis say? Do not win?

          No one doubts that they will win, but only at what cost? Damage to South Korea and Japan will be unacceptable, and the DPRK will have to be completely destroyed - are the "exceptional" ready for this? While the mountainous regions of the DPRK with underground bunkers cannot be smoked with conventional weapons, Seoul is in the accessibility of the barrel artillery of the northerners. And the northerners will not give up - they are ready to die.
    2. siberalt
      siberalt 28 October 2017 09: 24 New
      +2
      Let Mattis give at least one fact who the USA has ever defeated, not counting participation in the Second World War, and even then in the second front.
      1. MIKHA-M
        MIKHA-M 28 October 2017 09: 47 New
        +3
        Quote: siberalt
        Let Mattis bring at least one fact who the US has ever defeated

        Panama ..! laughing
        1. Grits
          Grits 29 October 2017 11: 20 New
          +1
          And Grenada! This is in the annals of the great American history of the winners.
      2. Pirogov
        Pirogov 28 October 2017 09: 52 New
        10
        Quote: siberalt
        Let Mattis give at least one fact who the USA has ever defeated, not counting participation in the Second World War, and even then in the second front.

        Unfortunately, the United States is printing the dollar and this is their main victory, and while it is the world currency, they dictate the rules of the game, and more than one generation. As for military victories, tell me, how did we use our victories? As always everyone has been forgiven? We have given most of Prussia to the Poles and Lithuanians, and now we are reaping gratitude. Etc..............
      3. 210ox
        210ox 28 October 2017 09: 52 New
        +2
        They won ... Panama itself ... It’s true that there, too, the Cuban builders put on bream valiant from the ILC ..
        Quote: siberalt
        Let Mattis give at least one fact who the USA has ever defeated, not counting participation in the Second World War, and even then in the second front.
        1. Lopatov
          Lopatov 28 October 2017 10: 09 New
          +4
          Quote: 210ox
          True, there, too, the Cuban builders put on bream valiant from the ILC ..

          At in Grenada was.
          And in Panama, they heroically defeated their former ally. Which did not want to revise the US-Panamanian agreement to transfer the Channel to Panama in 1999. Therefore, it was recognized as anti-democratic red
          1. 210ox
            210ox 28 October 2017 13: 46 New
            +1
            Thank you. I was wrong. Corrected ..
            Quote: Spade
            Quote: 210ox
            True, there, too, the Cuban builders put on bream valiant from the ILC ..

            At in Grenada was.
            And in Panama, they heroically defeated their former ally. Which did not want to revise the US-Panamanian agreement to transfer the Channel to Panama in 1999. Therefore, it was recognized as anti-democratic red
          2. Doliva63
            Doliva63 28 October 2017 16: 31 New
            +4
            Yeah. I remember that in Grenada there were 8000 yang-ki, including “seals” and “rangers,” against about 500 Cuban military builders. Awesome victory!
      4. mvg
        mvg 28 October 2017 16: 48 New
        0
        And what do you put in the word WIN? Hussein is not, Gaddafi is not, Milosevic is not. More than 700 bases throughout the world ..
        Do you think they should cry? Or maybe the USSR would have defeated the Germans without the United States? Seriously?
        1. dvina71
          dvina71 28 October 2017 20: 06 New
          +1
          Quote: mvg
          Or maybe the USSR would have defeated the Germans without the United States? Seriously?

          The USSR is the UNION .. and therefore - OH .. The USSR won. And he would have won without the USA. In addition, the Yankees also helped Germany .. their factories worked there until they bombed.
          So for a second .. The battle for Moscow .. victory without Western help. There rather Mongolia and Tuva helped. So for reference .. Tuva immediately gave the USSR all its gold reserves .. free of charge, and Mongolia supplied uniforms and horses and food .. And this help is significantly superior to Western
          1. mvg
            mvg 29 October 2017 07: 47 New
            0
            Yes, what, nak, gold reserve. Our Far East was “naked”. If the states had not entered the war with Japan, there would have been neither the Far East, nor the Urals. Lendlize helped a lot when there was nothing at all. When, before the battle for Moscow, out of 20 tanks, 000, God forbid, there would be no convoys without the Navy of England and the USA. The Union (he) for a long time "hung" on a thread, on the Rubicon, by crossing which, you could no longer return.
            And really see how many US Air Force pilots died who fought not on wooden LAGGs and YAKs, but on a very modern fleet of fighters and bombers.
            PS: I am not a supporter of the states, but then they considered that Hitler was “more dangerous” than Moscow ..
            1. dvina71
              dvina71 29 October 2017 09: 30 New
              0
              Quote: mvg
              When, before the battle for Moscow, out of 20 tanks, 000, God forbid, remained ...

              And how did land lease help here? Which began to come in November 41 (we omit the August dervish) consisted of as many as 8 cargo ships .., in each PQ. In which there was practically no military equipment. Rubber, ammonal, fuel .. tushenka and planes in pieces.
              So the key victory of 41g of the USSR was won exclusively by its own forces and the help of Mongolia and Tuva. Len-lease by the way nifiga does not help ... for each of their PQ went the same from the USSR with a load.
              Now about the losses of the pilots ... Comparing them is generally not correct. U.S. aircraft suffered major losses in the bombers. Up to 25% per departure, before the Mustangs in 44 who were able to accompany them. In the war with the USSR, the Luftaffe fought for supremacy in the air ..and lost .. LAGGs and Yakam.
              But from Kozhedub ..
              “To whom of the fire? Me?!” Kozhedub recalled indignantly half a century later. “The queue was long, with a long, one kilometer, distance, with bright ones, unlike our and German tracer shells. Because of the long distance, you could see the end the queue is bent down. I rolled over and, quickly moving closer, attacked the extreme American (by the number of fighters in the escort, I already knew who it was) - something exploded in his fuselage, he strongly steamed up and went with a decrease in the direction of our troops. reversal I attacked the next one. My shells lay down very well - the plane exploded in the air ...

              By the end of the war, the USSR Air Force consisted of such wolves as Kozhedub, which they demonstrated in Korea.
              I do not detract from the military support of the Allies in the Great Patriotic War, it is safe to say that it was decisive .. this is an exhaustive search.
              1. mvg
                mvg 29 October 2017 21: 36 New
                0
                carried in bombers. up to 25% per departure

                Forgive me, I do not have the honor of being familiar, you write everything incorrectly. )))
                If a quarter of the cars had not returned from departure, there would have been no next departure. This is a sure thing!
                2-5% - it was considered a lot. 10-20 is a disaster. They just won’t fly to the next flight.
                such wolves as Kozhedub, which they demonstrated in Korea

                How to say, Kozhedub did not fly to Korea - he commanded. And ours died no less than the Americans ... at least. Still, the F-86 is more interesting than the MiG-15. And the radar is both guidance from an external command center, and a better radios.
                PS: And the fact that the Fritz on the western front held the lion’s part of the Air Force — that was what helped the wooden Yak'am and La'vochkin win the air.
                My shells landed very successfully - the plane exploded in the air ...
                Read the Fritz’s memoirs - those were even cooler than the nightingale. Hartmann, Rudel with his "thing" - these are still nightingale robbers. Ours are no better. Only here the numbers speak of something else.
        2. Weyland
          Weyland 28 October 2017 20: 40 New
          +1
          Quote: mvg
          Or maybe the USSR would have defeated the Germans without the United States? Seriously?

          Would win. Another thing, as Mikoyan said, "without Lend-Lease, we would have fought for an extra 2 years"
          1. mvg
            mvg 29 October 2017 21: 37 New
            0
            Alternative history. The fact that without the West would be very sad
      5. Alex Nevs
        Alex Nevs 28 October 2017 18: 22 New
        +1
        and at the very end of the war
      6. The comment was deleted.
      7. Dark Lord
        Dark Lord 28 October 2017 20: 21 New
        0
        here are wars - https: //ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category: USA_Wars
        And, probably, the world reserve currency heard about the buck, the collapse of the USSR indirectly, strategic arms reduction treaties, the Nunn-Lugart plan -https: //ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Program_Nann___
        Lugar Such victories have not been dreamed of by anyone in the history of mankind, and economic and political victories are far more significant than arms victories.
    3. Primoos
      Primoos 28 October 2017 11: 41 New
      +2
      I don’t know if the pin.dos will reach the luminous hats, but they will soon get to the pots on their heads. The stuck friends, dill, will throw their know-how.
  2. Machete
    Machete 28 October 2017 08: 54 New
    +6
    You can defeat them at any moment. Just at what cost?
    1. the villain
      the villain 28 October 2017 09: 12 New
      +1
      Quote: Machete
      You can defeat them at any moment. Just at what cost?

      It may very well be that Pyrrova will win.
      1. To be or not to be
        To be or not to be 28 October 2017 10: 27 New
        +2
        America has already lost to North Korea. Not starting a war
        As the American Indians said - "tapping the tongue of the teeth" does not win the war. laughing
        And then US Secretary of Defense James Mattis "pounded his tongue" ...
        Fucking your affairs. America! smile
        1. MIKHA-M
          MIKHA-M 28 October 2017 10: 39 New
          +5
          Quote: To be or not to be
          America has already lost to North Korea. Not starting a war

          The second time already ...
          Quote: To be or not to be
          As the American Indians used to say, “knocking their teeth with their tongues” won’t win the war

          Speak the truth ..!
          Quote: To be or not to be
          Fucking your affairs. America!

          Almost many countries of the world are sure of this ..
          And here is my favorite song and video ..

          Still ahead of the gentlemen, the "chosen ones" in the USA, etc ...
          1. Nikolaevich I
            Nikolaevich I 28 October 2017 12: 56 New
            +2
            Thanks for the video! fellow I also always liked this song! good
    2. Orionvit
      Orionvit 28 October 2017 09: 13 New
      +4
      Quote: Machete
      You can defeat them at any moment. Just at what cost?

      Vietnam forgot. Yes, and the North Koreans, these are not corrupt Arabs where you can buy war.
    3. Yak28
      Yak28 28 October 2017 09: 42 New
      +1
      Quote: Machete
      You can defeat them at any moment. Just at what cost?

      And at what cost? Massive cruise missile attacks for several days, then bombing by strategic bombers. The price of victory is millions of corpses of North Koreans.
      If the United States begins the first with massive missile strikes, then, in addition to condemning some countries, the Americans are not in danger.
      1. Lopatov
        Lopatov 28 October 2017 10: 12 New
        +1
        Quote: Yak28
        Americans are not in danger.

        To the Americans? May be. If the North Koreans do not use their "nuclear special forces", equipped with dirty bombs.
        But for South Koreans and Japanese, hard times will come.
        1. Doliva63
          Doliva63 28 October 2017 16: 37 New
          +4
          Do they really have small-sized nuclear mines? Then they should already be halfway to the goal, otherwise they will not have time. And they will have such a chance only once.
        2. MOSKVITYANIN
          MOSKVITYANIN 29 October 2017 01: 20 New
          0
          Quote: Spade
          Quote: Yak28
          Americans are not in danger.

          To the Americans? May be. If the North Koreans do not use their "nuclear special forces", equipped with dirty bombs.
          But for South Koreans and Japanese, hard times will come.

          Correcting a little, for the Japanese and South Koreans, time will stop forever, but first life will stop at the Tokyo Stock Exchange ..
      2. Pancir026
        Pancir026 28 October 2017 14: 42 New
        +2
        Quote: Yak28
        And at what cost? Massive cruise missile attacks for several days, then bombing by strategic bombers. The price of victory is millions of corpses of North Koreans.

        Just like that .. North Koreans will sit and watch the bombing? Have you seen their fortifications? No? Well then, do not panic.
        This is the South Koreans. Yes, the Japanese should now not just scratch their turnips, but really think about what kind of gingerbread because of the United States they will burn in the war ...
    4. 7gor
      7gor 28 October 2017 13: 13 New
      +1
      Rather, at the cost of her life! And then, despite the fact that it is worth something
  3. PSih2097
    PSih2097 28 October 2017 08: 54 New
    +1
    Do not make a mistake, we will defeat you anyway

    and what will it result in for the rest of the world ???
  4. Mountain shooter
    Mountain shooter 28 October 2017 08: 57 New
    +5
    And, rhetoric at the level of yard boys of preschool age. You, like, do not try to touch me, or how I will give! It’s not a shame to say that yourself?
    1. The black
      The black 28 October 2017 09: 04 New
      +1
      DPRK versus the United States and NATO, like Odessa dust with a bare ass in front of the boatswain. laughing .... but can infect laughing... By the way, what does Johnny think about this? I would like to listen to the veteran of the Vietnamese boilers, Mr. McCacain smile
      1. Doliva63
        Doliva63 28 October 2017 16: 43 New
        +4
        Last time, the DPRK was against the United States and (scary to say) the UN, which was represented by 20 states. The United States and the United Nations have grown tired. Want a revenge? Not sure if the Russian Federation and China are swallowed. Although, of course, depending on what the United States will offer in return.
  5. sabakina
    sabakina 28 October 2017 09: 02 New
    +5
    allegedly Pyongyang is armed with “there may be a bomb capable of almost completely destroying the US population with an electromagnetic pulse”. Such a saying belongs to American experts Peter Pray and William Graham.

    Yes Yes Yes! Eun also has a Death Star!
  6. iliitchitch
    iliitchitch 28 October 2017 09: 03 New
    +3
    Any strike will be repulsed, yes. Peacocks, you say? Eunya just does not twitch. It is with you, streaks of striped, itches. He who seeks will find, I hope.
  7. stolz
    stolz 28 October 2017 09: 03 New
    +6
    The states tremble in fear of a small DPRK, intimidate it, but they do not take Russia into account, without any problems do it different dirty tricks, in words and in deed. Maybe the time has come to disperse the company that has entrenched in the State Duma, because there is no benefit from it, rather, on the contrary, and introduce presidential rule? Following the example of Comrade Stalin and Kim Jong-un.
  8. Herculesic
    Herculesic 28 October 2017 09: 04 New
    +2
    First you need to understand that a people who sincerely, like the North Koreans want to live outside our world, cannot be enslaved to you - they can only be completely destroyed, but it is impossible to make us slaves!
    1. Orionvit
      Orionvit 28 October 2017 09: 22 New
      +5
      Quote: Herkulesich
      a people who sincerely like the North Koreans want to live outside our world

      By and large, the people there did not ask anyone, this is their personal affair and it is not for us to judge them. However, just like in the USSR, no one asked us the same thing, but for some reason, those times are remembered with warmth, you were needed and in demand. Compare with current times. You all don't give a damn and you don’t fall into hr. But freedom, or rather its illusion in the Western interpretation.
      1. sharp-lad
        sharp-lad 28 October 2017 16: 15 New
        +2
        Exactly! When people talk about freedom, I really want to ask: from what and for how long ?!
        If they don’t lie, then several million citizens volunteered to join the North Korean army in the first weeks of the crisis, this is an indicator!
    2. Vadim237
      Vadim237 29 October 2017 00: 20 New
      0
      Rather, as a result of the war, the peoples of the north and south unite.
  9. izya top
    izya top 28 October 2017 09: 06 New
    0
    another winner fool
  10. The comment was deleted.
    1. dog breeder
      dog breeder 28 October 2017 09: 31 New
      +9
      By terrorists do you mean the United States? Yes, you are right, the country is a terrorist. Well, about the DPRK, I had the opportunity to communicate with the Koreans, not with those who tour the world. So, if these fanatics 3-5 thousand get to the US coast, the Americans themselves have to blow up Yellowstone. And this is not empty bravado; North Koreans are not Arabs.
      1. Golovan Jack
        Golovan Jack 28 October 2017 09: 37 New
        +7
        Quote: dog breeder
        ... who around the world is touring....

        Class !!!
        good laughing good
        Indeed, the Russian language is great and powerful ... as long as I live, I have never heard such a thing ...
    2. izya top
      izya top 28 October 2017 09: 32 New
      +6
      Quote: take the ready
      You’ll go to the bottom in conjunction with Assad, Iran’s Hezbalah.
      with all the terrorists


      Strange, but on your list are victims of terrorists. And the terrorists themselves are the Queen of Aglitz, the Yankees and the Israelite. And these Saudis and Qatar act in these supporting roles.
  11. Yak28
    Yak28 28 October 2017 09: 31 New
    +1
    The USA destroyed not a single country, and naturally, North Korea has no chance against the American power. The USA will not chew on snot and Russia will not divide the population into peaceful and non-peaceful, after any blow of North Korea to the United States or its allies wiped off the face of the earth. In general, America needs a war with Korea to show the whole world. And in particular Russia, who is the boss in the house, and for one justify the need for a NATO bloc.
  12. Mavrikiy
    Mavrikiy 28 October 2017 09: 36 New
    +2
    Mattis - Pyongyang: Make no mistake, we will win you anyway
    Pyongyang - to Mattis: how in 1953? Definitely.
    1. ventel
      ventel 28 October 2017 14: 40 New
      0
      You read how the Korean War went on if it weren’t for the Chinese, KIM’s grandfather would live somewhere in the suburbs like Babrak Kemal.
      1. Mavrikiy
        Mavrikiy 28 October 2017 15: 57 New
        +2
        Quote: ventel
        You read how the Korean War went on if it weren’t for the Chinese, KIM’s grandfather would live somewhere in the suburbs like Babrak Kemal.

        I read that. Did you read that the United States through the UN brought allies? I repeat my post:
        refresh your memory so that you don’t rave.
        USA - from 302 to 483
        UK - 63 000
        Philippines - 7430
        Canada - from 6146 to 26 791
        Turkey - 5190
        Netherlands - 3972
        Flag of France.svg France - 3421 [38]
        Flag of Australia.svg Australia - 2282
        Greece - 2163
        New Zealand - 1389
        Thailand - 1294
        Ethiopia - 1271
        Colombia - 1068
        Belgium - 900
        South Africa - 826
        Luxembourg - 44
        They could not and can not fight without allies. And this is not counting 500 of the Koreans.
        It turns out together for one honestly the South Caucasus and the United States in the DPRK? So the PRC did roughly 2x2
        know how to read? wink
        1. ventel
          ventel 28 October 2017 16: 26 New
          0
          Well then, tell me who first started the war. And also tell me if the Americans leave the Korean Peninsula you will give a 100% guarantee that there will be no war in Korea, I am sure of the opposite.
        2. MadCat
          MadCat 29 October 2017 01: 05 New
          0
          Quote: Mavrikiy
          They could not and can not fight without allies. And this is not counting 500 of the Koreans.
          It turns out together for one honestly the South Caucasus and the United States in the DPRK? So the PRC did roughly 2x2
          know how to read? wink

          you have a bad logic, the fact that the United States has allies ready to fight does not mean that the United States cannot fight alone.
      2. zoolu350
        zoolu350 28 October 2017 17: 17 New
        0
        If we remove the secondary school with a pack and China from the USSR, then the DPRK won the civil war in Korea in 1950, because the army of the South Caucasus merged at the moment (now the South Caucasus will merge even faster, because then the Koreans in the South and the North were the same, and now the inhabitants of the DPRK against the inhabitants of the South Caucasus, it is like steel against paper) Expect the DPRK in 1950. able to withstand the power of the school and school was foolish, but as soon as the PRC and the USSR pulled themselves up, the entire mattress community began to ski together.
        1. ventel
          ventel 28 October 2017 17: 27 New
          0
          Well, if you remove all the players except the Koreans, then there would be no war. But here the comrades forget that the USSR transferred so many weapons that KIM IR SEN decided to unite Korea by force of arms.
          1. zoolu350
            zoolu350 28 October 2017 17: 32 New
            0
            Quote: ventel
            But here the comrades forget that the USSR transferred so many weapons that KIM IR SEN decided to unite Korea by force of arms.

            And the army of the South Caucasus was armed with sticks? She was stuffed with mattress weapons and 8 of her 8 divisions were in the north.
            1. ventel
              ventel 28 October 2017 17: 40 New
              0
              Well, now, dear, you will not tell what the army of the South Caucasus and the army of the SK were armed with. I am just interested especially in tanks, artillery.
              1. zoolu350
                zoolu350 28 October 2017 18: 05 New
                0

                Tanks did not supply mattresses to the army of the South Caucasus, since they did not consider that they could be used in the conditions of this theater.
              2. zoolu350
                zoolu350 28 October 2017 18: 15 New
                0
                http://militera.lib.ru/h/korea_50_53/s093.gif
                So do not talk about the troops of the South Caucasus, which in 1950 peacefully grazing dogs.
                1. The comment was deleted.
  13. aszzz888
    aszzz888 28 October 2017 09: 48 New
    0
    It will become an effective and winning action!

    ... have you already opened champagne for victory? ... bully ... but do not have to pour the remaining 3 times in stacks of the remaining? ... bully
  14. Knowing
    Knowing 28 October 2017 09: 49 New
    0
    A lot of crazy people walk around the streets in the USA ... Nothing more to say.
  15. vvp2412
    vvp2412 28 October 2017 09: 50 New
    +1
    I remember in the middle of the 20 century North Korea was once “defeated” already! :)
    So, that took a little leg! And then North Vietnam also “won”, having won the cabbage soup!
    Dreaming is not bad ...
  16. APASUS
    APASUS 28 October 2017 09: 55 New
    +4
    Quite strange statements are made by US Secretary of Defense James Mattis regarding the DPRK. These are not aircraft carriers from Korea standing off the coast of the United States; it is not From Korea threatening to attack, but vice versa.
    It turns out very funny with these calls.
  17. The comment was deleted.
  18. Galleon
    Galleon 28 October 2017 10: 07 New
    +7
    Quote: Yak28
    The United States destroyed not a single country, and naturally, North Korea has no chance against American power.

    Yeah, how Vietnam did not have a chance in the 60s, how Iran did not have a chance in the late 70s ... And most importantly, HOW DOES RUSSIA HAVE NO CHANCE? You really wanted to say this?
  19. The comment was deleted.
  20. bk316
    bk316 28 October 2017 10: 12 New
    +6
    Enchanting balabol. Just think, the Minister of Defense of the country claiming absolute world superiority, the country is going to lead simultaneously and to win the war with the Russian Federation and China, conducts a dialogue in the style of a yard punks with a dwarf state. Conclusion from this unequivocal USA is afraid of the DPRK.
  21. midshipman
    midshipman 28 October 2017 10: 23 New
    +1
    Once the United States has already defeated the DPRK, Vietnam, and Angola. I will not list further. I have the honor.
  22. LAWNER
    LAWNER 28 October 2017 10: 37 New
    +1
    Let's dot the Eun ???
    Korea is one ... Eun and his part of Korea consider the Korean Peninsula Indivisible! Therefore, they will hit those who are nearby.
    And who is next ??? Those who have already tried nuclear weapons once?
    The United States, by and large, will be covered. But when an empty warhead bypassing the missile defense enters Tokyo, even the samurai will realize that playing further (even with Johnkoners) is very dangerous. And let alone the southerners.
  23. Vincent
    Vincent 28 October 2017 11: 09 New
    +2
    It remains only to shake the tube with the electromagnetic pulse at the UN and you can proceed ...
    1. Nikolaevich I
      Nikolaevich I 28 October 2017 13: 01 New
      +1
      And can you fix the electrodes to the chairs in the UN conference room? bully
  24. Non liberoid Russian
    Non liberoid Russian 28 October 2017 11: 24 New
    0
    just left over from south korea? from japan? China, too, will not stand aside (Taiwan will blow up), as well as Russia ... and they will be stuck in Korea to their very long ears and zinc will flow to the mainland not by a stream, but by a river
  25. Eurodav
    Eurodav 28 October 2017 11: 44 New
    0
    The impression is that in the mattress officials-children with large genitals ... Moreover, stupid ...
  26. stolz
    stolz 28 October 2017 12: 26 New
    +3
    Quote: Yak28
    ... America needs a war with Korea to show the whole world. And in particular Russia, who is the boss in the house ...

    And what to show, except that without war, it is unclear:
    - More than 100 billion dollars of Russia are placed in the USA and they can be withdrawn at any time ...
    - The Central Bank of Russia belongs to the US Federal Reserve ...
    Now we just can’t do anything ... We can’t adequately answer, while 80% are dependent on the States. Our ridiculous sanctions such as restricting the import of pork, only cause laughter in all countries of the world.
    1. sharp-lad
      sharp-lad 28 October 2017 16: 20 New
      0
      Something the Poles do not laugh. smile
    2. bk316
      bk316 30 October 2017 10: 35 New
      +2
      while 80% percent dependent on the United States

      What did you think? Why not 99% silt 146%?
  27. Nemesis
    Nemesis 28 October 2017 13: 34 New
    +1
    US victory over North Korea will be a PIR victory
  28. Slovak
    Slovak 28 October 2017 13: 39 New
    0
    The mattresses die and go crazy with Cuban crickets and cicadas, let alone the use of technical means against them ...
  29. Bert
    Bert 28 October 2017 16: 24 New
    0
    Quote: NIKNN
    Quote: xetai9977
    How did this Eun deserve praise for the site members? ........ You think it's good. when will a nuclear mushroom grow in the Far East ?.

    Do you think it is good to be lawless slaves of narcissistic idiots? I am a nuclear mushroom in the Far East VERY and VERY unlikely (it’s just 100% guaranteed neither when, nor what can be), and if this happens in the region (not only in the Far East), believe me, it will not be due to Un's fault ... hi

    Another finger sucking. Until EUN began his trials, no one had ever oppressed and touched him. What kind of slaves are we talking about? And it is precisely through the fault of the UN that the whole mess will begin, as well as the 1950 war unleashed by the DPRK. Inadequate needs another nuclear country with unpredictable consequences.
    1. zoolu350
      zoolu350 28 October 2017 17: 23 New
      +1
      Quote: Bert
      And it is precisely through the fault of the UN that the whole mess will begin, as well as the 1950 war unleashed by the DPRK. Inadequate needs another nuclear country with unpredictable consequences.

      1950 war The DPRK did not unleash, an offensive operation was carried out during an ALREADY GOING civil war.
  30. Sergey2068
    Sergey2068 28 October 2017 21: 41 New
    +1
    The point is not only that the DPRK has nuclear weapons, and there is certainly a way to deliver it to the United States not only with the help of missiles. The fact is that in order for the US operation to be successful, it will be necessary to take complete control of the territory of the DPRK , which is purely physically more than problematic. Since the time of the truce, the DPRK was preparing for such a war. The people of the DPRK will fight to the last and then this operation can drag on for many years and will most likely end in the shameful flight of the United States. It is impossible to completely destroy the territory adjacent to China and Russia - this will mean the 3rd world one. And even if this does not happen, the US reputation as a democratic superpower will be completely destroyed - after all, the UN will never agree to a nuclear war with the DPRK. even for many years they have not been able to cope with Afghanistan, and there the conditions of war are much simpler and there are no nuclear weapons. So the stupid person trump himself into a trap. He then pumps it up, only if he doesn’t do it, what he promises means he’s just a bullshit and will be subsequently accepted all over the world later on. And if he does, then the consequences for the USA will most likely be catastrophic. Well, for example, what prevents Koreans from delivering nuclear charges closer to the territory of the USA in advance, for example on ordinary boats, boats or submarines? But what would it be like if several hydrogen bombs explode in their coastal waters? Yes, even with cobalt filler!
    1. Vadim237
      Vadim237 29 October 2017 00: 26 New
      0
      "The people of the DPRK will fight to the last" But the FIG knows what will happen in practice - they won’t want to give up, the United States will simply arrange a total blockade of the DPRK, and without food, water, ammunition, fuel, medicine, under constant bombing, it will break - part of the remaining .
      1. bk316
        bk316 30 October 2017 10: 41 New
        +2
        The United States will simply arrange a total blockade of the DPRK,

        This they will have to capture a couple of provinces in China ....
  31. vik669
    vik669 28 October 2017 21: 50 New
    0
    Well stupid! And there’s nothing to add.
  32. Ilja2016
    Ilja2016 29 October 2017 00: 18 New
    +1
    Quote: xetai9977
    I do not understand those who write stinging comments. And what wrong did Mattis say? Do not win? How did this Eun deserve praise for the site members? Its adequacy? Or that. what put the region on the brink of war? You think that’s good. when will a nuclear mushroom grow in the Far East?

    Americans put the world on the brink of war