Military Review

New BDK "Ivan Gren" held a shooting in the Baltic Sea

36
The crew of the large landing ship "Ivan Gren", located on the factory trials in the Baltic Sea, conducted artillery firing at the naval target.


As reported in the information support department of the press service of the Western Military District in the Baltic the fleet, during the tests, the BDK used a 30 mm artillery mount. A ship’s shield imitating a conditional enemy’s surface ship was used as a target. At the time of going to sea, communication systems were checked, as well as the operation of the bow and stern landing devices.

New BDK "Ivan Gren" held a shooting in the Baltic Sea


We remind you that the BDK "Ivan Gren", which is to serve in the Northern Fleet, is the lead ship of the 11711 project, built in Kaliningrad at the Amber plant. The ships of this project are armed with the AK-176М and AK-630М universal naval artillery mounts, the A-215 Grad-M multiple launch rocket launchers with a range of 20 kilometers. On the deck, there is a basing of one Ka-27 search and rescue helicopter or a Ka-29 transport and combat helicopter.

The BDK of this project can take on board up to 13 units of heavy equipment (tanks) or up to 36 infantry fighting vehicles or armored personnel carriers, as well as the personnel of the air assault units. By order of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation, another ship of this project is being built in Kaliningrad - BDK Peter Morgunov.

A week earlier, the AK-630M airborne artillery complex was tested at BDK and the electromagnetic hull was treated with the help of de-magnetization ships CP-28 and CP-936 in order to reduce the physical field.
Photos used:
Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation
36 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. san4es
    san4es 27 October 2017 15: 07 New
    14
    BDK Ivan Gren, which is to serve in the Northern Fleet, is the lead ship of project 11711, built in Kaliningrad at the Yantar Shipyard. soldier
  2. Dezinto
    Dezinto 27 October 2017 15: 10 New
    +8
    Surely somewhere wrinkled ...... one face Grybauskaite .... winked
    And probably already writes notes to NATO ...
    1. Sharansky
      Sharansky 27 October 2017 15: 16 New
      12
      Yes, NATO is in shock. 13 years to build is serious.
      1. Dezinto
        Dezinto 27 October 2017 15: 20 New
        13
        Yes, yes, all the crap, I understand. But f 35 is the best aircraft in the world. ))))) this is not for me. I am in your opinion an awesomely stupid cheers patriot. the word "rashka" probably often sounds in your vocabulary? )))
        1. Sharansky
          Sharansky 27 October 2017 16: 58 New
          +6
          How interesting you are from your finger sucked what I did not say. Did the program crash?
          1. Dezinto
            Dezinto 27 October 2017 18: 00 New
            +2
            Did the program crash?


            Yes, kapets has been messing up lately. These tube transistors have long been time to change.
        2. Med_Dog
          Med_Dog 28 October 2017 21: 41 New
          0
          They are *.
      2. axiles100682
        axiles100682 28 October 2017 13: 17 New
        0
        But they also completed the glory of God.
    2. APASUS
      APASUS 27 October 2017 20: 53 New
      +4
      Quote: DEZINTO
      Surely somewhere wrinkled ...... one face Grybauskaite .... winked
      And probably already writes notes to NATO ...

      Mushrooms can be let go wrinkle whatever they want, and NATO conducts planning of maritime operations. For them, one BDK class ship is not a fact, not a fact at all. No need to inflate your cheeks from scratch
  3. Egorovich
    Egorovich 27 October 2017 15: 11 New
    +9
    When will you finally enter the Russian Navy, Ivan Gren?
    1. newcomer
      newcomer 27 October 2017 15: 21 New
      +8
      in November of this year.
      1. Ryazan87
        Ryazan87 27 October 2017 15: 42 New
        +4
        Yes you are an optimist. He also did not pass the ZHI. Well, if by mid-2018 ...
        Unfinished, of course, exceptional.
        1. newcomer
          newcomer 27 October 2017 17: 51 New
          +4
          12.10.17/XNUMX/XNUMX “Ivan Gren” proceeded to the final part of the XXI, in which it remained to check the operation of weapons and communications. The end of October is expected to end. acceptance is planned by the end of November, may be adjusted before the end of the year. but the fact that it is unfinished, yes. so there were objective and subjective reasons for this (the topic was sufficiently covered and disassembled). so it’s necessary to finish and accept according to any one, not to let him into scrap? this question is probably not for you, but for those who are not content with the very existence of Grena.
          1. Ryazan87
            Ryazan87 27 October 2017 19: 24 New
            0
            A ship is so painfully born that it is scary to jinx it. One circus with the demagnetization of what was worth.
      2. Ryazan87
        Ryazan87 13 February 2018 10: 54 New
        +1
        "Large landing ship" Ivan Gren "of project 11711 will be transferred to the Russian Navy towards the end of spring. About this, as RIA Novosti reports, said the president of the United Shipbuilding Corporation Alexei Rakhmanov. "
        https://flotprom.ru/2018/%D0%AF%D0%BD%D1%82%D0%B0
        %D1%80%D1%8C33/
  4. Warrior-80
    Warrior-80 27 October 2017 15: 13 New
    +1
    I know that it’s not its purpose, but mine is not a lot of toothless, it’ll only fight off pirates, they could cram a few PCRs on the deck
    1. Alexey RA
      Alexey RA 27 October 2017 15: 20 New
      12
      Quote: Warrior-80
      I know that it’s not its purpose, but mine is not a lot of toothless, it’ll only fight off pirates, they could cram a few PCRs on the deck

      Why should there be little things: on the tank - "Caliber", on the yut - "Mace"! smile

      Why BDK PKR?
      1. Warrior-80
        Warrior-80 27 October 2017 15: 32 New
        +1
        As far as I remember, BDKs now go to Syria without any security, at least as above water, why not have a few PCRs for every fireman, if we drive BDKs without protection
        1. donavi49
          donavi49 27 October 2017 15: 55 New
          +3
          Obviously because:
          - These anti-ship missiles will increase the cost of the ship, and seriously. For they also need a radar, a combat post and an outfit (an increase in l / s).
          - these anti-ship missiles will not help him.
          - these anti-ship missiles will limit target capabilities, at least for placing cargo on deck.

          Why is it necessary to protect the BDK on the Tartus-NVMB line? If a full-fledged war with NATO-they live and the KUG with Petya, Moscow, Ustinov, Varyag and Kuzey. For RCC will fly from all sides, from all carriers. If the women are - then RCC is unnecessary, because it will not take a shahidlodka, but there are no big goals. If a separate country is such a sad fate. Further trump cards to politicians on an otvetka or tomatoes.
          1. newcomer
            newcomer 27 October 2017 17: 55 New
            +4
            you can even go further along the line of your thought: why do we need ships? even further: why do we need the Navy at all?
            1. Alexey RA
              Alexey RA 27 October 2017 18: 51 New
              +1
              Quote: newbie
              you can even go further along the line of your thought: why do we need ships?

              In fact, MO has long been went further - instead of the BDK, VTR works on the Syrian Express line. For the BDK for this line is excessive in terms of unloading capabilities, insufficient in capacity and extremely voracious in terms of the knocked out resource.
              Quote: newbie
              even further: why do we need the Navy at all?

              Certainly not to knock out the resource of ships, driving them through the Straits for the amusement of the Turks - look how giaurs are afraid of us.
              1. newcomer
                newcomer 27 October 2017 20: 12 New
                +3
                Of course, it’s better to drive loads of killed Turkish troughs. and not only the goods will be dragged by Gren. those same marines of ours with weapons. VTR is a completely different topic, don’t you? so in your opinion from Grena, BDK, to mold a bulk carrier?
                1. Alexey RA
                  Alexey RA 30 October 2017 18: 41 New
                  +1
                  Quote: newbie
                  so in your opinion from Grena, BDK, to mold a bulk carrier?

                  PMSM, this will be the most rational use of this unknown animals.
                  For the landing of the marine corps battalion by the traditional BDK method (with approaching the coast and unloading the landing "on foot") is a meat grinder today. In the standing "Grena" even a mortar battery will not miss.
                  1. rudolff
                    rudolff 30 October 2017 18: 56 New
                    +1
                    When they signed the contract on the Mistral, the MO breathed a sigh of relief and made arms transport from Gren. But then ... everything had to be unscrewed back and again turned it into a BDK. Hence, this hemorrhoids with demagnetization, transport was not necessary.
          2. Nikolai Grek
            Nikolai Grek 27 October 2017 22: 07 New
            +5
            Quote: donavi49
            If there is a full-fledged war with NATO, they will also live in the KUG with Petya, Moscow, Ustinov, Varyag and Kuzey.

            no matter how you overestimate their "chewing gum" !!! wassat wassat lol lol lol
        2. Alexey RA
          Alexey RA 27 October 2017 19: 26 New
          +2
          Quote: Warrior-80
          As far as I remember, BDKs now go to Syria without any security, at least as above water, why not have a few PCRs for every fireman, if we drive BDKs without protection

          From whom can a BDK fight off a pair of anti-ship missiles?
          From a shahid boat? No chance: such boats are usually detected and classified as a target in the near zone of the ship - in the dead zone of the RCC. And at these ranges the same “Duet” is many times more effective.
          From a hostile ship / boat in any country? So it still doesn’t help - as long as they agree to open fire (to say the declaration of war), the story with “Stark” will be repeated.
          If you really want to push something onto the BDK, it’s better to strengthen air defense.
        3. Nikolai Grek
          Nikolai Grek 27 October 2017 22: 06 New
          +4
          Quote: Warrior-80
          why not have a few PCRs for every fireman,

          what what what "original" approach in military affairs !!! laughing laughing laughing Now give advice in the aircraft industry so that you don’t take a steam bath with fighters, bombers, attack aircraft, tankers, etc., etc., and "just in case a fireman" banged one car !!! wassat wassat lol lol lol
  5. Chelentanych
    Chelentanych 27 October 2017 15: 21 New
    +1
    Correct if I am mistaken, but Gradov on project 11711 is not in the current armament.
    1. newcomer
      newcomer 27 October 2017 15: 29 New
      +5
      weapons "Grena" several times corrected. maybe at the exit we’ll get the initial armament according to the project, but not cut off according to the budget of the Moscow Region.
    2. Veteran
      Veteran 27 October 2017 15: 54 New
      +5
      According to recent reports, he has neither AK-176 nor Grad. It is armed with 1x12 30 mm AK-630M-2 "Duet", 2x6 30 mm AK-630M, 2x1 14,5 mm MTPU, MANPADS "Igla" 8 ZUR. But TBV KA-29 helicopters he should have two.
      1. Boa kaa
        Boa kaa 27 October 2017 20: 23 New
        +3
        Quote: Veteran
        It is armed with 1x12 30 mm AK-630M-2 "Duet", 2х6 30 mm AK-630М, 2х1 14,5 mm MTPU, MANPADS "Igla" 8 ZUR.

        The day before yesterday I climbed it. The duet - I saw, turrets under the Cords / Cliffs - I saw ... But I didn’t see two more AK-630Ms ... Maybe later it will be re-equipped, but for now ... the "hollow is empty", however. request
        1. Veteran
          Veteran 28 October 2017 00: 03 New
          +3
          The location of two AK-630M on the aft superstructure, above the gates of the helicopter hangar.
  6. Bronevick
    Bronevick 27 October 2017 15: 22 New
    0
    It also shoots
  7. VohaAhov
    VohaAhov 27 October 2017 16: 01 New
    +1
    What kind of joy is this in people? All sites rang up on this news. But in fact, the AK-630M was adopted in the distant 1973.
    1. Don
      Don 27 October 2017 16: 18 New
      +2
      And what do you want, people want to see this unparalleled wunderwafel, which has been under construction for 13 years, during this lifetime. The French with their Mistral nervously smoke on the sidelines and scratch their turnips, looking at this miracle of Russian shipbuilding lol
  8. Holoy
    Holoy 27 October 2017 16: 54 New
    0
    Not that ... that's it
    1. Alexey RA
      Alexey RA 27 October 2017 19: 29 New
      +1
      Mayo sho mayo. Excuse me - they haven’t delivered the “leaders” today. smile
  9. The comment was deleted.