The new Ivan Gren BDK fired in the Baltic Sea

The crew of the large landing ship "Ivan Gren", located on the factory trials in the Baltic Sea, conducted artillery firing at the naval target.

As reported in the information support department of the press service of the Western Military District in the Baltic the fleet, during the tests, the BDK used a 30 mm artillery mount. A ship’s shield imitating a conditional enemy’s surface ship was used as a target. At the time of going to sea, communication systems were checked, as well as the operation of the bow and stern landing devices.

We remind you that the BDK "Ivan Gren", which is to serve in the Northern Fleet, is the lead ship of the 11711 project, built in Kaliningrad at the Amber plant. The ships of this project are armed with the AK-176М and AK-630М universal naval artillery mounts, the A-215 Grad-M multiple launch rocket launchers with a range of 20 kilometers. On the deck, there is a basing of one Ka-27 search and rescue helicopter or a Ka-29 transport and combat helicopter.

The BDK of this project can take on board up to 13 units of heavy equipment (tanks) or up to 36 infantry fighting vehicles or armored personnel carriers, as well as the personnel of the air assault units. By order of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation, another ship of this project is being built in Kaliningrad - BDK Peter Morgunov.

A week earlier, the AK-630M airborne artillery complex was tested at BDK and the electromagnetic hull was treated with the help of de-magnetization ships CP-28 and CP-936 in order to reduce the physical field.

Comments

[san4es]

BDK Ivan Gren, which is to serve in the Northern Fleet, is the lead ship of project 11711, built in Kaliningrad at the Yantar Shipyard.

[Dezinto]

Surely somewhere wrinkled ...... one face Grybauskaite ....
And probably already writes notes to NATO ...

[Sharansky]

Yes, NATO is in shock. 13 years to build is serious.

[Dezinto]

Yes, yes, all the crap, I understand. But f 35 is the best aircraft in the world. ))))) this is not for me. I am in your opinion an awesomely stupid cheers patriot. the word "rashka" probably often sounds in your vocabulary? )))

[Sharansky]

How interesting you are from your finger sucked what I did not say. Did the program crash?

[Dezinto]

Did the program crash?

Yes, kapets has been messing up lately. These tube transistors have long been time to change.

[Med_Dog]

They are *.

[axiles100682]

But they also completed the glory of God.

[APASUS]

Quote: DEZINTO

Surely somewhere wrinkled ...... one face Grybauskaite ....
And probably already writes notes to NATO ...

Mushrooms can be let go wrinkle whatever they want, and NATO conducts planning of maritime operations. For them, one BDK class ship is not a fact, not a fact at all. No need to inflate your cheeks from scratch

[Egorovich]

When will you finally enter the Russian Navy, Ivan Gren?

[newcomer]

in November of this year.

[Ryazan87]

Yes you are an optimist. He also did not pass the ZHI. Well, if by mid-2018 ...
Unfinished, of course, exceptional.

[newcomer]

12.10.17/XNUMX/XNUMX “Ivan Gren” proceeded to the final part of the XXI, in which it remained to check the operation of weapons and communications. The end of October is expected to end. acceptance is planned by the end of November, may be adjusted before the end of the year. but the fact that it is unfinished, yes. so there were objective and subjective reasons for this (the topic was sufficiently covered and disassembled). so it’s necessary to finish and accept according to any one, not to let him into scrap? this question is probably not for you, but for those who are not content with the very existence of Grena.

[Ryazan87]

A ship is so painfully born that it is scary to jinx it. One circus with the demagnetization of what was worth.

[Ryazan87]

"Large landing ship" Ivan Gren "of project 11711 will be transferred to the Russian Navy towards the end of spring. About this, as RIA Novosti reports, said the president of the United Shipbuilding Corporation Alexei Rakhmanov. "
https://flotprom.ru/2018/%D0%AF%D0%BD%D1%82%D0%B0
%D1%80%D1%8C33/

[Warrior-80]

I know that it’s not its purpose, but mine is not a lot of toothless, it’ll only fight off pirates, they could cram a few PCRs on the deck

[Alexey RA]

Quote: Warrior-80

I know that it’s not its purpose, but mine is not a lot of toothless, it’ll only fight off pirates, they could cram a few PCRs on the deck

Why should there be little things: on the tank - "Caliber", on the yut - "Mace"!

Why BDK PKR?

[Warrior-80]

As far as I remember, BDKs now go to Syria without any security, at least as above water, why not have a few PCRs for every fireman, if we drive BDKs without protection

[donavi49]

Obviously because:
- These anti-ship missiles will increase the cost of the ship, and seriously. For they also need a radar, a combat post and an outfit (an increase in l / s).
- these anti-ship missiles will not help him.
- these anti-ship missiles will limit target capabilities, at least for placing cargo on deck.

Why is it necessary to protect the BDK on the Tartus-NVMB line? If a full-fledged war with NATO-they live and the KUG with Petya, Moscow, Ustinov, Varyag and Kuzey. For RCC will fly from all sides, from all carriers. If the women are - then RCC is unnecessary, because it will not take a shahidlodka, but there are no big goals. If a separate country is such a sad fate. Further trump cards to politicians on an otvetka or tomatoes.

[newcomer]

you can even go further along the line of your thought: why do we need ships? even further: why do we need the Navy at all?

[Alexey RA]

Quote: newbie

you can even go further along the line of your thought: why do we need ships?

In fact, MO has long been went further - instead of the BDK, VTR works on the Syrian Express line. For the BDK for this line is excessive in terms of unloading capabilities, insufficient in capacity and extremely voracious in terms of the knocked out resource.

Quote: newbie

even further: why do we need the Navy at all?

Certainly not to knock out the resource of ships, driving them through the Straits for the amusement of the Turks - look how giaurs are afraid of us.

[newcomer]

Of course, it’s better to drive loads of killed Turkish troughs. and not only the goods will be dragged by Gren. those same marines of ours with weapons. VTR is a completely different topic, don’t you? so in your opinion from Grena, BDK, to mold a bulk carrier?

[Alexey RA]

Quote: newbie

so in your opinion from Grena, BDK, to mold a bulk carrier?

PMSM, this will be the most rational use of this unknown animals.
For the landing of the marine corps battalion by the traditional BDK method (with approaching the coast and unloading the landing "on foot") is a meat grinder today. In the standing "Grena" even a mortar battery will not miss.

[Nikolai Grek]

Quote: donavi49

If there is a full-fledged war with NATO, they will also live in the KUG with Petya, Moscow, Ustinov, Varyag and Kuzey.

no matter how you overestimate their "chewing gum" !!!

[Alexey RA]

Quote: Warrior-80

As far as I remember, BDKs now go to Syria without any security, at least as above water, why not have a few PCRs for every fireman, if we drive BDKs without protection

From whom can a BDK fight off a pair of anti-ship missiles?
From a shahid boat? No chance: such boats are usually detected and classified as a target in the near zone of the ship - in the dead zone of the RCC. And at these ranges the same “Duet” is many times more effective.
From a hostile ship / boat in any country? So it still doesn’t help - as long as they agree to open fire (to say the declaration of war), the story with “Stark” will be repeated.
If you really want to push something onto the BDK, it’s better to strengthen air defense.

[Nikolai Grek]

Quote: Warrior-80

why not have a few PCRs for every fireman,

"original" approach in military affairs !!! Now give advice in the aircraft industry so that you don’t take a steam bath with fighters, bombers, attack aircraft, tankers, etc., etc., and "just in case a fireman" banged one car !!!

[Chelentanych]

Correct if I am mistaken, but Gradov on project 11711 is not in the current armament.

[newcomer]

weapons "Grena" several times corrected. maybe at the exit we’ll get the initial armament according to the project, but not cut off according to the budget of the Moscow Region.

[Veteran]

According to recent reports, he has neither AK-176 nor Grad. It is armed with 1x12 30 mm AK-630M-2 "Duet", 2x6 30 mm AK-630M, 2x1 14,5 mm MTPU, MANPADS "Igla" 8 ZUR. But TBV KA-29 helicopters he should have two.

[Boa kaa]

Quote: Veteran

It is armed with 1x12 30 mm AK-630M-2 "Duet", 2х6 30 mm AK-630М, 2х1 14,5 mm MTPU, MANPADS "Igla" 8 ZUR.

The day before yesterday I climbed it. The duet - I saw, turrets under the Cords / Cliffs - I saw ... But I didn’t see two more AK-630Ms ... Maybe later it will be re-equipped, but for now ... the "hollow is empty", however.

[Veteran]

The location of two AK-630M on the aft superstructure, above the gates of the helicopter hangar.

[Bronevick]

It also shoots

[VohaAhov]

What kind of joy is this in people? All sites rang up on this news. But in fact, the AK-630M was adopted in the distant 1973.

[Don]

And what do you want, people want to see this unparalleled wunderwafel, which has been under construction for 13 years, during this lifetime. The French with their Mistral nervously smoke on the sidelines and scratch their turnips, looking at this miracle of Russian shipbuilding

[Holoy]

Not that ... that's it

[Alexey RA]

Mayo sho mayo. Excuse me - they haven’t delivered the “leaders” today.