Why Putin will not go to the polls next year

267
Why Putin will not go to the polls next year


First of all, we will expose the myth of tens of billions of dollars, euros and moggles stored in GDP in the West. This is how only losers judging by their unrealizable dreams think. Since the “civilized West” began a third century ago to withdraw money of any person without a court decision, banks not only provide information about customers, but also participate in the withdrawal of funds ... understandably. If we consider that the disagreeable US politicians come under attack, Gaddafi and Hussein are an example of this, the values ​​in the West are held by “aristocrats and degenerates”.



The president of Russia, popular in his homeland and loved by voters, has much more valuable things in life. Like any politician of such a rank, he wants to enter historyleaving behind a good memory and such a mark in history, which will be remembered for centuries. Vladimir Putin does not belong to the greedy, stupid and cowardly. Is that provides different Yanukovych asylum.

Today, the current president of Russia has every chance of entering the newest history of Russia with no less luggage than Stalin. About which they say that he "accepted Russia with a plow, and left it with an atomic bomb." For this, Vladimir Putin, who is accustomed to leading and keeping the situation under control, needs to remain in power as long as possible.

The scheme was calculated during his second term. In strict accordance with the current legislation, the GDP transfers the presidency to Medvedev, himself becoming the country's prime minister. Given the age of Vladimir Putin, in 2018, it seems logical to transfer power to 6 for years to a successor, taking over the post of prime minister.

It seems clear that Medvedev will not be president before 2024. Thus, Dmitry Anatolyevich will have to free the post of prime minister for GDP. By the election of 2024, Vladimir Putin will be 71 year. At the same age became the president of Donald Trump. A strong and healthy Putin at this age will not be able to leave the presidency without hope of ever taking it again, but on the contrary, he will return to the leadership of the country.

For a true leader who is used to keeping everything under his control, this seems to be a sensible decision. At the same time, the developing situation also contributes to this.

Certainly difficult next 6 years, with inevitably very painful decisions in Ukraine, will be the responsibility of the successor to Vladimir Putin. And the situation with any development of the situation will be accompanied by discontent of the population. Some will be dissatisfied with the fact that the remnants of Ukraine are not accepted into Russia, others - that Russia is spending money on the restoration of a “foreign” country. Actually, the development and change of the vector of public opinion is already clearly visible. The tents at each corner with donations for the Donbass in 14-15 today gave way to the rumor that "because of Ukraine, we began to live worse."

Next year, the cries of "Russia, send in troops!" May begin. The United States is quite able to provide such a "gift" to Russia, with the hands of the Nazis gulf of Ukraine with blood. And the subsequent restoration of Russian influence in this area will cause even greater costs in the early years and even greater dissatisfaction.

But let us leave political predictions - today it is impossible to verify their authenticity, as well as to disprove. But you can look at the facts.
Today, in addition to the traditional Yavlinsky-Zhirinovsky, a number of self-promoted candidates claim the presidency of Russia, guaranteeing the transformation of the presidential race not even into a show, but into a low class booth. To participate in which a person like Vladimir Putin is simply not comme il faut.

I'm not even talking about the poet Alina Vitukhnovskaya and not about the honored inventor of Russia Vladimir Mikhailov. Just look into the honest eyes of Ksyusha Sobchak and you will understand - the show behind the glass in a madhouse-3 is guaranteed.

And so that Xu was not lonely and bored, the former deputy of the State Duma, the mayor of Arkhangelsk, Alexander Donskoy, would look great with her. This political figure has already taken the first steps towards his triumph - he declared himself gay, went to buy bread at Sterligov’s shop and starred in a poorly directed video, pretending to be a victim of an attack of an incomprehensible type who suddenly mounted on a poor gay presidential candidate.

Acquaintance with the works of Donskoy and his team, causes the desire to wash with soap and not hands - a computer. After a cursory review of his YouTube, you stop marveling at something: blowjob lessons for the camera and a walk in the center of the capital in brown-stained shorts are the everyday life of this clown. Some of the names of his commercials speak for themselves (I apologize in advance): “I crap in public”, “Gorizhop from Alexander Donskoy”, “Muslim Virgin in school”, “Don married a porn star Olesya Malibu”, .... The most decent and adequate title is “I am a candidate against Ksenia Sobchak”.

Against this background, the fake diploma of the university is perceived by Donskoy as a childish prank. And an old saying comes to mind: "I am with such a hectare ...".

In my opinion, in such a company, Vladimir Putin simply has nothing to do.

PS Of course, all of the above can turn into dust simply because Vladimir Putin will not decide in such difficult times to give the presidency "in good hands." But over the past 17 years, the team was somehow formed by them and repeatedly tested. And times - times do not choose - they live and die in them. And after 2024, they won't be any easier.
Better - yes.

But not easier.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

267 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +66
    27 October 2017 06: 52
    . Today, in addition to the traditional Yavlinsky-Zhirinovsky, a number of self-nominated candidates claim the presidency of Russia, guaranteeing that the presidential race is not even a show, but a base booth. To participate in which a person like Vladimir Putin is simply not comme il faut.

    And who made this booth? Arranged in such a way that there is not a single serious candidate in the election, but himself! Already reached the handle! Kidly famous Ksenia Sobchak invited, which even Navalny bypasses! So it happened, on the one hand - a gray rabble, and on the other - in the divine radiance our sun-faced! This is how selfish and narcissistic one must be in order to build this theater of the absurd from a great country.
    Let me remind you how, in Putin’s opinion, he got rid of more serious candidates. Belykh proposed to withdraw his candidacy in exchange for the governor. But Rogozin didn’t allow this to happen before the race under a strange pretext.
    1. +19
      27 October 2017 06: 59
      Agree, this is completely in the tradition of the civilized West - tolerance and political correctness. Madonnas and women of easy virtue also have rights.

      As for the Great Country, "I don’t remember from the time of Gorbachev any" Majesty ", which began to appear 10 years ago in real affairs, and not the inflamed imagination of fanatics.
      1. +12
        27 October 2017 07: 04
        Quote: Mikle1
        Agree, this is completely in the tradition of the civilized West - tolerance and political correctness. Madonnas and women of easy virtue also have rights.

        I agree, Ksenia Sobchak, also has the right, like any other, however. But the fact is that any other will not pass the election, there are no random people there. And if someone suddenly appears on the horizon, some kind of a barter, or not at all, will be allowed!
        1. +21
          27 October 2017 07: 09
          Not true. Self-promoted there mass. And the fact that they will not be chosen is obvious. My coach constantly itches about how bad the power is, but votes for GDP, because "these ... are even worse."

          As for the dream of “every honest and decent”, this is a myth, politics is a very dirty business. Honest and decent there will eat on the way.
          1. +23
            27 October 2017 07: 15
            Quote: Mikle1
            Not true. Self-nominated there are many. And the fact that they will not be selected is obvious.

            Why, then, is this gray mass in the absence of serious candidates, not fake ones? Is it really normal for the whole country ?? Or maybe someone specially arranged it all?
            1. +2
              27 October 2017 12: 25
              Quote: Stas157
              Or maybe someone specially arranged it all?

              The article clearly states that all these self-nominees are needed solely to turn the election into a booth. Although not a lot, but to add dirt to Putin, if he will run.
              a number of self-nominated candidates claiming the post of president of Russia, guaranteeing that the presidential race is not even turned into a show, but into a low-level booth
              1. +8
                28 October 2017 16: 52
                Not! GDP has already cheated once exchanging with a dimon. After that, the word Guarantor does not apply to him.
                1. 0
                  2 November 2017 15: 49
                  I prefer this "fraud" rather than the hell of 1917 followed by Stalinism ... enough have passed ...
          2. +9
            27 October 2017 10: 39
            Quote: Mikle1
            As for the dream of “every honest and decent”, this is a myth, politics is a very dirty business. Honest and decent there will eat on the way.

            Well, that’s precisely why only they become Great (with a capital letter!) Leaders who, having gone through all this dirt, managed to preserve their honor, dignity and human face.
          3. +2
            27 October 2017 11: 44
            Quote: Mikle1
            Not true. Self-nominated there are many. And the fact that they will not be selected is obvious.
            True, in the last election everyone was wrapped, except for Prokhorov

            ru.wikipedia.org ›Presidential Election in Russia (2012)
        2. +23
          27 October 2017 09: 11
          Quote: Stas157
          Quote: Mikle1
          Agree, this is completely in the tradition of the civilized West - tolerance and political correctness. Madonnas and women of easy virtue also have rights.

          I agree, Ksenia Sobchak, also has the right, like any other, however. But the fact is that any other will not pass the election, there are no random people there. And if someone suddenly appears on the horizon, some kind of a barter, or not at all, will be allowed!


          Any "pyramid" of power is built to ensure that even in theory no one could appear even "beyond the horizon." No boss built into the "pyramid" will take a person smarter than himself, and will not appoint the head of the lower link smart. Even if there is a “genius” at the top, at the base of the pyramid will turn out to be, to put it mildly, not very smart. The problem of any power vertical is that, as the upper echelons are "liberated", "stupidity" rises from below higher and higher pushing everything clever and honest beyond the limits of the "pyramid". Therefore, nothing smart and worthwhile will ever appear next to a "celestial."
          1. +2
            27 October 2017 12: 36
            By your logic, some stupid people are sitting on top! And since the country lives and develops, it means that your opinion is not true.
            1. +1
              30 October 2017 07: 18
              Quote: kudma
              By your logic, some stupid people are sitting on top! And since the country lives and develops, it means that your opinion is not true.


              Well, let’s put 17 years is not the time to completely “rot”. As you know and see, the release of the upper echelons has not yet occurred and as a result the lower echelons have not progressed noticeably. And my opinion is confirmed by the fact of "castling", or do you consider equal GDP and DAM?
            2. +5
              30 October 2017 18: 19
              Then drive away from the mask, 500 kilometers away, and you will see how the country survives and falls apart.
          2. 0
            2 November 2017 15: 55
            kakbe, everything seems to be true, but the system also has an instinct for self-preservation, so the nomination of strong, smart, decision-makers is inevitable to preserve the system itself .. An example of this is Pyotr Arkadyevich Stolypin.
      2. 0
        30 October 2017 13: 59
        She is entitled by law. I agree with you. But a person who understands the affairs of the state should come to the post of head of state, the people must trust him, have positive authority, etc. And what can this person bring to the country? The country needs to be preserved, to make it prosperous. And sometimes, changing the transmission channels, I understand that I got to house 2. Where they yell at each other until they turn blue. And they teach people not to create families, but only to ruin them. And then the whole country is in these intrigues. Yes, it should not be allowed to come close to power. There will be a house 2 nationwide.
    2. +10
      27 October 2017 07: 52
      Quote: Stas157
      Ksenia Sobchak invited the lonely famous


      You, with a probability of 100%, are sure that "Ksyusha is the Kremlin's project" ?!
      1. +28
        27 October 2017 08: 38
        Why Putin will not go to the polls next year

        Putin may not go to the polls for only one purpose: to show the screamers what the country expects if he leaves office! But Vladimir Vladimirovich will not go so low, so he will go to the next term of the presidency. And the fact that there are odious candidates for this position is nothing reprehensible in this: the retinue of buffoons always accompanied the king.
        1. +9
          27 October 2017 11: 27
          I agree! Putin will go to the polls and let the well-wishers not hope that the country cannot be trusted with another person at such a moment. But we need to think about the receiver and we will see it after the election as part of the new government, or it will even be its chairman.
          1. +24
            27 October 2017 14: 39
            you cannot trust another person
            And that is true, suddenly it ceases to optimize, and begins to build factories, schools, hospitals. God forbid, he will refuse liberalism, he will stop buying American treasuries. Suddenly he refuses to raise his retirement age, and again he will make medicine free. No, this should not be allowed to the leadership.
        2. +7
          27 October 2017 14: 47
          Quote: СРЦ П-15
          Putin may not go to the polls for only one purpose: to show the screamers what the country expects if he leaves office!

          I remember that almost the same thing was said by members of the Politburo about dear Leonid Ilyich Brezhnev ... fellow
          1. +2
            27 October 2017 15: 07
            Quote: ranger
            I remember that almost the same thing was said by members of the Politburo about dear Leonid Ilyich Brezhnev ...

            And they were right! Is not it?
            1. +9
              27 October 2017 15: 50
              Quote: СРЦ П-15
              And they were right! Is not it?

              So, right, since no disaster happened with his departure - on the contrary, his successor Andropov undertook to put things in order - the mess in the country accumulated above the roof ...
              It’s only now that everyone seemed to live then and it was all in chocolate - many people judge it based on the stories of their parents, and not on the basis of their own experience ... And any leader of our country is necessarily the only and indispensable (while he’s in power, of course , then everything happens).
              So, when I was a pioneer, they told me a lot about how well we will heal when I become an adult. And now, when I’ve been an adult for a long time, they tell me a lot about how well we lived when I was a pioneer ... That's how we live ... hi
              1. +8
                27 October 2017 18: 47
                Quote: ranger
                So, right, since no disaster happened with his departure - on the contrary, his successor Andropov undertook to put things in order - the mess in the country accumulated above the roof ...

                I remember how Andropov put things in order: they caught people in stores and asked why they weren’t at work. Only "Andropov vodka" was remembered - the only thing he did good for a simple person, lowering its cost. But above nothing has changed. And I am still sure that under Brezhnev we lived the best! And this is not from the stories of parents, but from their own experience. I also found Khrushchev and his corn.
                1. +3
                  30 October 2017 07: 33
                  Quote: SRC P-15
                  Quote: ranger
                  So, right, since no disaster happened with his departure - on the contrary, his successor Andropov undertook to put things in order - the mess in the country accumulated above the roof ...

                  I remember how Andropov put things in order: they caught people in stores and asked why they weren’t at work. Only "Andropov vodka" was remembered - the only thing he did good for a simple person, lowering its cost. But above nothing has changed. And I am still sure that under Brezhnev we lived the best! And this is not from the stories of parents, but from their own experience. I also found Khrushchev and his corn.

                  Well, let's start with the fact that Andropov spent only 1,5 years with the Government and not 29 as Stalin, not 18 like Brezhnev and not 11 like Khrushchev. Do you notice a difference in terms?
                  I heard about questions in cinemas and shops "why not at work", but I have never been asked personally, perhaps because I didn’t run away from work? Although the weekend I had on Tuesday and Wednesday, but I have never encountered one. Therefore, I perceive this bike with a great deal of skepticism.
                  Upstairs, of course, changes have also occurred, the “swamp” has stirred. Cases on celestials began to be started, removed from posts.
                  I also found Khrushchev in my childhood and I remember jokes about corn, but now I’m walking down the street and I see them at home they call them "Khrushchevs" and I live in such a house. But they were built as temporary, with a maximum of 25 years. But 55 years have passed already, and the "Khrushchevs" are lousy and tens of millions still live in them. And you are corn, corn.
            2. +1
              28 October 2017 21: 53
              Quote: СРЦ П-15
              And they were right! Is not it?


              But he (ranger) no longer remembers this, probably ... lol
      2. +12
        27 October 2017 09: 21
        Quote: B.T.W.
        You, with a probability of 100%, are sure that "Ksyusha is the Kremlin's project" ?!

        I do not know. But, I marvel at it! Sobchak by his presence defames only elections. From her, even the liberal Navalny shies! Oddly enough, but considers himself more serious. Why is this for the Kremlin, why did Putin give her consent (she personally stated this)?
        1. +9
          27 October 2017 09: 39
          Ksenia, go ahead! Her failure was a trial of the entire liberal party .. And the title "candidate for president of the Russian Federation" already exists
          It's like the first democrat sobchak .. Well. and family ..
          Regarding GDP
          He spent all of October in various forums:
          - gives a deep assessment of the situation in the world. and ways out of this situation
          - assesses the internal state of Russia. Talks about its development trends and new directions of movement
          - Raises the issue of social protection of the population. and already gave the command to increase pensions since 2018, including the military
          What is this if not candidate programs for a new term ??
          "The horses at the crossing do not change, is not it?"
          . galley without a rower ... however ...
          1. +45
            27 October 2017 10: 20
            Quote: To be or not to be
            He spent all of October in various forums:
            - gives a deep assessment of the situation in the world. and ways out of this situation
            - assesses the internal state of Russia. Talks about its development trends and new directions of movement
            - Raises the issue of social protection of the population. and already gave the command to increase pensions since 2018, including the military
            What is this if not candidate programs for a new term ??
            "The horses at the crossing do not change, is not it?"

            He’s already 17 years old in all forums ... but GDP isn’t growing .... Ukraine was captured by Bandera ... medicine, education industry is in ruin ... a third of the population are poor ... Kazakhstan goes to Latin ... Crimea does not recognize not a single CIS ally ... debts to all countries are written off ... NATO tanks in the Baltic states ... do not index pensions for working pensioners ... Zenit-arena costs more than the budget of most regions of Russia .. clumsy footballers will not win a single match (forecast ), and billions will go to a feast during the plague, and at that time 211 (think about it !!!) children died in 1017 on physical education from a collapsed football goal and undetected diseases ... they collect money for treatment of children via SMS, and bent-legged football players, effective managers of state-owned companies receive several million a day ..
            1. +2
              27 October 2017 10: 58
              Ksenia with Manal will put things in order and build a gate
            2. +8
              27 October 2017 11: 21
              Quote: the most important
              raise money for SM

              People, horses, football players ... Well, did he send at least one SMS like this?
              1. +6
                27 October 2017 14: 41
                he sent at least one SMS like that?
                WHAT absolutely crap? Take an interest in Gref, Shuvalov, Sechin ...
                1. +5
                  27 October 2017 15: 40
                  Do you feel sorry for half a dash or a hundred rubles for a sick child? All of you dolboslavs on the Sechins with the Greeks bring down, all of you are to blame.
                  1. +6
                    27 October 2017 16: 51
                    All of you dolboslavs on the Sechins with the Greeks bring down, all of you are to blame
                    Before you register on sites, learn the culture of communication. This is the first.
                    Secondly, Poltyashok is not a pity, but only then even let them go, who are not guilty of anything and are not responsible for anything.
                    1. The comment was deleted.
                    2. +3
                      30 October 2017 08: 19
                      Quote: Gardamir
                      WHAT absolutely crap? Take an interest

                      Quote: Gardamir
                      Before you register on sites, learn the culture of communication

                      And are you still talking about culture? Or do you have mental disorders? Split personality for example
              2. +2
                30 October 2017 07: 46
                Quote: Velizariy
                Quote: the most important
                raise money for SM

                People, horses, football players ... Well, did he send at least one SMS like this?


                Are you sure that my or your "half-odd" will go to the child, and will not settle in the pocket of any regular "Gref"? I personally am completely unsure of this. They got money to Friske, but now they don’t know where they went and what they’d do, either the roommate pocketed, or they needed to tear off an extra 21 million rubles from relatives.
                1. +9
                  30 October 2017 08: 00
                  Quote: E_V_N
                  They got money to Friske, but now they don’t know where they went and what they’d do, either the cohabitant pocketed, or they needed to tear off an extra 21 million rubles from relatives

                  Well, yes ... but where does the "next Gref" have to do with it?
                  You have problems with logic, my dear wink
                  1. +2
                    30 October 2017 13: 36
                    Quote: Golovan Jack
                    Well, yes ... but where does the "next Gref" have to do with it?
                    You have problems with logic, my dear

                    Yes, because money went through Sberbank, and for some reason it is not known where they went. But in your opinion, of course, Gref has nothing to do with it, he didn’t personally translate, although he leads Sberbank, but does not answer. He is also not responsible for why a bank with 50% + 1 state participation closed all of its branches in one of the regions of the Russian Federation called Crimea. At the same time, he poured billions into branches in Ukraine, and sold them for hundreds of millions, causing billions in losses to the main shareholder of the Russian Federation and like water off a duck.
                    1. +9
                      30 October 2017 15: 36
                      Quote: E_V_N
                      Yes, because the money went through Sberbank, and for some reason it is not known where did it go

                      Ay-yai-yay ... how bad ...
                      My dear, money from the bank like this "unknown where," as a rule, does not go away.
                      If they left, it means someone got them. And it was certainly not Gref laughing
                      I’m not commenting on other things. "Blurring threads" is called, seen, know. Not interested negative
            3. +9
              27 October 2017 11: 29
              well, this is pure decadence! typical liberal sentiment - because of the trees do not see the forest .... at least lie down and die! although in reality the situation is completely different. Russia, by all indications, is on the verge of a major breakthrough into the leaders of the modern world! and this should be headed precisely by Putin. I think he will definitely go to the next term; there is no other way! people just do not understand ....
            4. 0
              27 October 2017 13: 35
              Subtly noticed!
            5. +1
              27 October 2017 15: 34
              ..everything is lost .. laughing laughing laughing
              ..and ICBM launches come from three Wednesdays ..
              1. +2
                27 October 2017 16: 17
                Nope, from one Thursday ...))
            6. +9
              28 October 2017 22: 00
              Quote: the most important
              He is already 17 years old in all forums ... but GDP is not growing .... Ukraine was captured by Bandera ...


              As I look at the comments on the VO, the election campaign for the presidency has begun ... Are the anti-Putin activists too early ???
              The fact that Ukraine was captured by Bandera is to blame ... Kazakhstan goes to Latin - it is to blame ... Crooked-footed football players cannot play - and GDP is to blame too !!!

              Yokarny Babai !!! And how his country suffers !!! And even - he expects that he will remain for the next term !!!
              Py.Sy. Frankly, I also want Putin to remain the President of the Russian Federation in 2018 for the next term ... I have the right to have an opinion ... hi soldier
              1. +4
                29 October 2017 16: 30
                Of course not to blame! Not a single promise has been fulfilled, but still we love him, a little rascal! And we will choose it until it dies. After all, the Russians apart from him have not a single sensible person. Here I completely agree and support you.
                1. +2
                  29 October 2017 18: 20
                  "The old horse will not spoil the furrow", but the traitor can trample it on a slonk%)
          2. +3
            27 October 2017 16: 22
            GDP was the president, there is a president and will be the president, and the election booth is a mast go show ..., people are hailing ...))
            1. 0
              29 October 2017 18: 21
              Soon the mausoleum will be released at the suggestion of Xenia and put there a scarecrow guess whose;)
          3. +2
            30 October 2017 07: 38
            Quote: To be or not to be
            "The horses at the crossing do not change, is not it?"

            Something we have not been able to cross for 25 years, everyone at the crossing is writhing. Although already the helmsman Yeltsin was replaced by the helmsman GDP. So we are changing the “horses” at the crossing?
        2. +7
          27 October 2017 11: 48
          Quote: Stas157
          Sobchak by his presence defames only elections. From her, even the liberal Navalny shies!
          Well, someone should act as a scarecrow, like if not Putin, then this! Well, march quickly, voted for whom it is necessary soldier
    3. +4
      27 October 2017 11: 13
      It's funny to hear reproaches towards Putin that there is no worthy opponent in the election.
      1. +10
        27 October 2017 11: 59
        Really funny, all over Russia, Putin alone and better not.
        But this is a lie, just a political clearing built under Putin.
        But he is not Kashchei the Immortal, he will leave anyway.
        Russia and its people are above Putin, and not vice versa.
        Let the prime minister come to work and restore order within the country.
        1. +10
          27 October 2017 12: 30
          Quote: stas
          Let the prime minister come to work and restore order within the country.

          Yeah, and the Pedal horse will restore order in the international arena. laughing Yes, such that in horror hair stand on end. laughing
          1. +2
            27 October 2017 13: 43
            LADY cannot be a pedal horse.
            LADY is the place in Artik; let the polar bears frighten the digital economy there. They will eat him along with his iPhone. And we will forget about him.
            1. +10
              27 October 2017 14: 23
              Quote: stas
              LADY is the place in Artik, let scary polar bears there

              Polar bears are listed in the Red Book, they need to be protected, and you are going to send DAM there, take pity on the bears. laughing And the pedal horse, Lech Navalny, would be just right for feeding the bears. hi
              1. +2
                27 October 2017 14: 33
                And Lyokha is just a children's scarecrow.
                But Navalny constantly spoils their mood, and is not afraid to do it. Zhirik Lehe is only suitable as toilet paper.
                If the Kremlin is afraid of Lyokha Navalny, then these are thieves afraid of the truth.
                1. +13
                  27 October 2017 14: 44
                  Quote: stas
                  If the Kremlin is afraid of Lyokha Navalny, then these are thieves afraid of the truth.

                  Yeah drop it fellow the thief at the thief stole a club on your way out. laughing The Kremlin is afraid of Lech, it’s funny, at any moment the Kremlin can slam Pedal’s horse, it’s not for nothing that he walks under condition. request neither the Kremlin nor the same Nasralny will give it, but Lech simply, voices what he is given, but the youngsters gather for rallies, then he will simply follow Nemtsov. laughing hi
                2. +7
                  28 October 2017 13: 14
                  This scarecrow, but on the nozzle.
            2. 0
              29 October 2017 18: 23
              DAM will kill any bear with his iPhone, which Obama gave him.
              So that you should not underestimate him in vain!
          2. +3
            29 October 2017 16: 35
            Yeah, and the Pedal horse will restore order in the international arena.


            And now the order is in place? We can’t count allies, one is cooler than the other. Two super powers: Abkhazia and Vanuvatu. This is a triumph!
        2. +1
          27 October 2017 14: 42
          inside the country.
          preferably not Russia.
        3. 0
          28 October 2017 22: 06
          Quote: stas
          Let the prime minister come to work and restore order within the country.


          He had already worked as prime minister, and pretty well, unlike DAM ...
          But you yourself are pushing for an option that many scold: Putin-Medvedev castling ... So what exactly do you want, do you even know yourself?
          1. +8
            28 October 2017 22: 26
            Quote: weksha50
            So what exactly do you want, do you even know yourself?

            I know, IMHO. Try it on the Internet, it wants to, it expresses itself so request
        4. +2
          30 October 2017 07: 51
          Quote: stas
          Really funny, all over Russia, Putin alone and better not.
          But this is a lie, just a political clearing built under Putin.
          But he is not Kashchei the Immortal, he will leave anyway.
          Russia and its people are above Putin, and not vice versa.
          Let the prime minister come to work and restore order within the country.


          Oh, just not the Prime Minister, there’s something else in foreign policy ... but in the domestic, and especially in the economy, he’s far from ice.
    4. +12
      27 October 2017 12: 19
      Quote: Stas157
      And who made this booth? Arranged in such a way that there is not a single serious candidate in the election, but himself!

      I will tell you this way, to lead the country, especially such as Russia - this is not to run the kiosk! Power in the STATE is never given away by anyone; it is taken. In what ways is the third thing, but the fact itself is. And these snot about the fact that there are no candidates, because they do not allow them to speak and lead the people - WRONG! There simply aren't those who have enough “teeth” to take power, and why should Russia not have a “toothless” president who is not allowed, is not given, is not taken? ..
      Remember how Vysotsky’s: "there are few real violent ones - there aren’t any leaders ..."
    5. +5
      27 October 2017 12: 50
      I know the level of access door analytics. Trying to analyze political processes from the height of a dropout student. One person does not let the other two fight for the chair ... are they running for a break in the dining room? Persons in politics is a concentrated view large groups of peopleunited by common views. Present at least one individual who has become the head of state. Behind all (no exceptions !!!) is the team. What, parties are banned in Russia? No. So, this is the problem of the parties in the absence of real candidates, nobody wants to work, they want to get into ladies right away.
      1. +7
        27 October 2017 13: 37
        Quote: Grumant
        Trying to analyze political processes from the height of a dropout student.

        Praise be to the Almighty, I mastered the two highest ...
        Quote: Grumant
        Personalities in politics are a concentrated representation of large groups of people united by common views. Present at least one individual who has become the head of state. Behind all (no exceptions !!!) is the team.

        Here is my comment on the topic "Putin's Election Program" (on this resource), about Putin and why he doesn’t cut his head: "You see what’s the matter, Putin didn’t come to power from the street, not by competition, he was helped to come and did it specific people. For better or worse, another question, I personally think that it has always been so ... Now he just cannot send these people and their henchmen, because he has obligations. " (my personal opinion).
        1. +1
          27 October 2017 18: 59
          Quote: raw174
          Praise be to the Almighty, I mastered the two highest ...

          Not an indicator! There are a lot of people with higher education in the country, but alas ...
          Quote: raw174
          Putin came to power not from the street, not by competition, he was helped to come and specific people did it.

          Those. Do you think that they picked up the zyz chairman, and then broke off? And I have information that Putin was originally part of the "group of comrades", especially since I had an insider 2 years before Putin appeared.
          Quote: raw174
          Now he just cannot send and plant these people and their henchmen, as there are obligations.

          Those. you do not admit that like-minded people remained like-minded, and there is no reason to send or plant them?
          1. +3
            30 October 2017 06: 52
            Quote: Grumant
            what did they pick up in the garbage can of the zits-chairman, and then broke off? And I have information that Putin was originally part of the "group of comrades"

            Yes, it’s clear that it was not from the street, but the group, as you put it, “comrades” that put forward, I mean this when I say that I didn’t come ...
            Quote: Grumant
            Those. you do not admit that like-minded people remained like-minded, and there is no reason to send or plant them?

            As time goes on, everything changes, of course, he remained like-minded with someone, and the paths diverged with someone, but it will not work to scatter the first and second casemates, the first because it is not necessary, the second because the obligations of previous years.
            This is purely my opinion, there is no exact data, because I take information only in the public domain ...
        2. +1
          30 October 2017 08: 45
          Quote: raw174
          Now he just cannot send and plant these people and their proteges, as there are obligations. "(My personal opinion).

          These are more likely not obligations, but "concepts." He is of course a son of a bitch, but this is our son of a bitch. For me it’s so bad, the son of a bitch should sit, and our or your son doesn’t matter. Otherwise, there will never be order in the country.
          1. +2
            30 October 2017 10: 39
            Quote: E_V_N
            For me it’s so bad, the son of a bitch should sit, and our or your son doesn’t matter. Otherwise, there will never be order in the country.

            There are two options, by analogy with the army, there is hazing, and there is statism. Where is more order? There is no definite answer, is it the same in the criminal world, are there black and red zones, where there is more order? How to look ... So here, if you adhere to my views (regarding obligations), then failure to fulfill them will entail distrust and disrespect for former comrades-in-arms who have not ceased to have weight, but whose views have diverged, and this in turn will undermine the throne and situations in overall, will lead to attempts to change it ...
            1. +1
              30 October 2017 13: 53
              Quote: raw174
              There are two options, by analogy with the army, there is hazing, and there is statism. Where is more order? There is no definite answer, is it the same in the criminal world, are there black and red zones where there is more order? How to look ... So here, if you adhere to my views (regarding obligations), then failure to fulfill them will entail distrust and disrespect for former comrades-in-arms who have not ceased to have weight, but whose views have diverged, and this in turn will undermine the throne and situations in overall, will lead to attempts to change it

              The charter is army law and is said to be written in blood. Therefore, a law is definitely better, a bad one is good, but a law than lawlessness and anarchy in the form of hazing. Therefore, the unequivocal answer is simply obvious.
              With regard to crime and zones, there should be no red, no black, no striped, all these colors replace the Law with the concepts of a boss. Not wanting to fulfill one’s duty, but getting “dividends” at the same time results in shifting responsibility for order and legality from administration to criminals. Criminals naturally replace state laws with their own criminal ones. So, that here you definitely need to comply with the laws of the Russian Federation, and not criminal concepts.
              Regarding obligations, you again replace the rule of law with “concepts”. If obligations are violated, laws of the Russian Federation are violated, what GDP may have obligations to violators-criminals, why should it provide them with immunity and protect them from punishment? Do you seriously think that when he puts someone in his position, he swears to "smear" for any crimes?
              1. +2
                30 October 2017 14: 16
                Aren't you an ChCist for an hour? smile
                In our life, everything is intertwined and the law and concepts. Power consists of OUR Russians and their life is the same (in terms of decision-making). You can build an idealistic picture where the law is the only guide to action, but this is utopia! From the concepts (criminal, military, courtyard and others, including the code of honor) we will not go anywhere ...
                Quote: E_V_N
                what gross domestic product obligations can be for criminals-offenders,

                Ordinary, according to concepts, and maybe, in honor, not to deviate from the promise given once, I don’t know for sure ...
                Quote: E_V_N
                Do you seriously think that when he puts someone in his position, he swears to "smear" for any crimes?

                Yes, I seriously think so.
      2. +2
        27 October 2017 13: 38
        Oh, is that not me? ...
        1. +1
          27 October 2017 13: 48
          Putin’s problems ... I’m for him, (others have been removed), but then the clowning ...
    6. +2
      28 October 2017 16: 18
      The mentality of the Russian people, stability, and therefore we need a permanent master (an example of a monarchy), and impostors are chaos, the only change of master is the successor voiced by the president (Putin) and accepted by the people. Stop tormenting Russia.
    7. 0
      29 October 2017 21: 46
      I agree with you. Although Rogozin is also not a candidate.
    8. 0
      30 October 2017 07: 56
      Quote: Stas157
      Belykh proposed to withdraw his candidacy in exchange for the governor. But Rogozin didn’t allow this to happen before the race under a strange pretext.

      And that Belykh is a candidate better than a dog?
    9. 0
      31 October 2017 13: 13
      Why did you give an example only from Belykh? Are you a liberal?
    10. 0
      2 November 2017 14: 58
      Sorry, but Rogozin as president of the country is, to put it mildly, strange. And if candidate Belykh is removed from the race for the sake of governorship (and this would not have been offered to a dubious opponent), then this was the candidate’s goal. And neither is it a victory in the presidential election. I fundamentally disagree that Putin and Co. somehow influenced the emergence of an alternative candidate. For some reason, it is generally accepted that Putin’s rival should adhere to opposing views on Crimea, Russia's geopolitics, economy, etc. This is not so and how much can you already think so? Why Putin’s opponent cannot be the same statesman, but with a different economic program? Or an ardent opponent of the influence of the IMF and Fed institutions on the country's Central Bank. Why should the opponent be radically opposed? And it’s customary to pay attention only to scandalous critics of the state. And if they are “covered up” in full, then for some reason their failure is considered a struggle against dissent. And who is at the hearing? Kasyanov and Co.? Misha 2% already had every chance. Or other ex, who was driven away from the feeder. Bulk? A person without a political and economic program. The new leader of the country should be "given birth" by the society itself. And if it does not "give birth" to him, then it means that it is not time yet.
  2. 0
    27 October 2017 06: 56
    As the saying goes ... "every joke has a fraction of a joke." Wait and see.
    1. +12
      27 October 2017 10: 36
      It’s sad to already look at it. What a clowning.
      Putin needs a new economic policy - building a socialist socialist state, and not trying to improve a market flea market.
      Now Russia is not for the people, but for the oligarchs and officials.
      The people do not need this. Let them relocate all the oligarchs to the Arctic with DAM.
      1. +4
        27 October 2017 11: 00
        Russia does not need capitalism even with Putin's face.
        1. +4
          27 October 2017 11: 20
          I think capitalism is still needed, but not the same as it is now. Now the oddities mostly have the money with the letter M, but it’s necessary that decent people become rich. I, as it were, didn’t correctly express my thought in words, but ... didn’t think about which people and how they can earn today? Decent, in every sense, people, if they work for themselves, it doesn’t work out very well for them. It’s easier to make money by throwing someone, deceiving someone, etc. This is not right. I think so.
          1. +6
            27 October 2017 11: 32
            In Russia, fascist oligarchic capitalism thrives which parasitizes the people.
          2. The comment was deleted.
          3. +4
            27 October 2017 19: 22
            Quote: ivselim
            I think capitalism is still needed

            If you really think so, then re-read (or read Marx) and do not build illusions. Capitalism, as a socio-political formation, does not imply not only general happiness, but even equality.
            Quote: ivselim
            didn’t think about what and how people can earn today?

            So, after all, the period of initial capital accumulation is over. You did not have time to grab your piece? .. Well, I'm sorry ... and read Marx.
            Quote: ivselim
            It’s easier to make money by throwing someone, deceiving someone, etc. This is not right. I think so.

            Provide capital with 10% of the profit, and the capital agrees to any use, at 20% it becomes lively, at 50% it is positively ready to break its head, at 100% it violates all human laws, at 300% there is no crime that he did not dare to go, at least under pain of the gallows
            - Thomas Joseph Dunning
        2. +2
          27 October 2017 13: 54
          Quote: stas
          Russia does not need capitalism even with Putin's face.

          not really ... face ...
      2. +2
        27 October 2017 12: 21
        Quote: stas
        Now Russia is not for the people, but for the oligarchs and officials.

        I would say the world as a whole is so arranged, somewhere more are shared with the people, somewhere less ...
      3. +2
        27 October 2017 12: 23
        Quote: stas
        Putin needs a new economic policy - building a social socialist state

        So they tried it, something didn’t work out very well ... Do you think the second time it will be better?
        1. +3
          27 October 2017 13: 23
          This was the first and initial experiment.
          The first planes also crashed, but now we see another aircraft.
          Naturally, it could not work without errors.
          But, China proves that socialism is better than capitalism, even with Putin's face.
          1. +2
            29 October 2017 18: 37
            China is far from socialism and especially communism.

            There, people in prisons work with bars on the windows so that they do not jump from the windows.

            There is such a mixture of slavery, feudalism, capitalism and communism.

            However, from communism there only a partial Soviet framework remained.
            1. 0
              30 October 2017 08: 54
              Quote: Krabik
              China is far from socialism and especially communism.

              There, people in prisons work with bars on the windows so that they do not jump from the windows.

              There is such a mixture of slavery, feudalism, capitalism and communism.

              However, from communism there only a partial Soviet framework remained.


              Are you a Sinologist that is so confident about the state system of China? Or maybe a specialist in economic formations? At the last congress of the CCP, it was stated that in 2025 the standard of living in China will be equal to the level of the developed countries of capitalism, and for some reason I believe. So what kind of feudalism are you talking about?
              1. +1
                30 October 2017 10: 24
                To watch videos with barracks and bars on the hostels for workers, you do not need to be a Sinologist.

                And an economic Chinese miracle can at any moment turn to dust after the withdrawal of world corporations from its territory and the introduction of protective duties in the EU, Russia and the USA.

                Which is quite realistic if China acts too brazenly.

                And of course the closing of a freebie from Iran, which, due to cheap sanctions, supplies fuel to China.
                1. 0
                  30 October 2017 14: 02
                  Quote: Krabik
                  To watch videos with barracks and bars on the hostels for workers, you do not need to be a Sinologist.

                  And an economic Chinese miracle can at any moment turn to dust after the withdrawal of world corporations from its territory and the introduction of protective duties in the EU, Russia and the USA.

                  Which is quite realistic if China acts too brazenly.

                  And of course the closing of a freebie from Iran, which, due to cheap sanctions, supplies fuel to China.

                  Behind the Moscow Ring Road in many settlements of the Russian Federation, the 1st and 2nd floors of houses since the 90s have stood with bars on the windows. Does this mean that the inhabitants of the Russian Federation live in medieval prisons? By the way, in a neighboring house - a former dormitory, on the ground floor, the Chinese live and the windows are barred, does this mean that in the Chinese, the Chinese are being held in prison?
                  The Chinese economy can certainly collapse, just as the US economy can collapse, if China, India and the Russian Federation abandon the dollar as a reserve currency and move on to gold, so what?
                  1. +1
                    30 October 2017 19: 41
                    I live on the 1st floor in Moscow and I have a window grille since the 90s, when nariks loitered here.

                    How should one distinguish lattices on hostels from suicides of slaves and lattices in the dashing 90s from bandits and drug addicts.

                    And gold is the wishlist of cheers-patriots, the real economy begins with a powerful fleet capable of controlling trade routes.
      4. +3
        27 October 2017 14: 47
        Putin needs a new economic policy - building a socialist socialist state, and not trying to improve a market flea market.
        You missed a word. Putin does not need social policy, but he protects the flea market.
      5. +3
        29 October 2017 22: 15
        For 18 years he did nothing. After the Crimea, I did nothing (although there was a brilliant opportunity, the support was amazing). Everything is just the opposite. 1 trillion was stolen from the budget in 2016, according to the Accounts Chamber. Medicine and education are being destroyed. Economics in ..ope. What is the point of expecting something from him? What is this highest level of masochism?
        1. +2
          30 October 2017 07: 17
          Quote: Uralets
          For 18 years he did nothing.

          People began to live better, for 18 years (judging by their locality) because:
          1. They are not afraid to send their sons to the army, as in the 90s (Chechnya, general moods, etc.).
          2. Salaries are practically not delayed (there are exceptions, but they are rare).
          3. The level of household comfort has grown strongly: cars for everyone who wants to have a good house, power consumption has increased significantly. in every house just a little bit of everything ...
          4.From the 90s, fertility has been rising.
          5. you can scold law enforcement, but compared with the 90s, there is more order! The police began to serve more prestigious, as a result of less arbitrariness and a mess ...
          6. In the world arena, the Russian Federation has significantly strengthened its position, including thanks to decisive action to strengthen the defense.
          You can list a lot of things ...
          Quote: Uralets
          Medicine and education are being destroyed.

          This is my favorite phrase))) And what exactly is destroyed? Your children do not have the opportunity to learn? You do not have a school in the village / town? Your children are not able to get a profession? And if you get sick, the ambulance will not come to you? gypsum in the clinic will not impose? And my friend changed the hip joint for free, and my wife gave birth to a son five months ago, the conditions of the transfer center, like in the movies, everything is fine and the care and nutrition ... Yes, there are problems, especially in small villages and villages (up to 1 thousand There are no FAPs), but in general, everything is not so sad.
          Of course, not everything is fine, there are mistakes and problems in all sectors, mistakes are made, but not a little is achieved ...
  3. The comment was deleted.
  4. +7
    27 October 2017 07: 06
    Russia does not need a president.
    Russia needs the Supreme Commander of the RF Armed Forces.
    We open our eyes, dear. We see the root of military reality and make the only right and vital choice for Russia.
    1. +3
      27 October 2017 07: 11
      Yeah. I agree that Russia needs a dictator. But a pure warrior is usually a bad quartermaster. And Russia needs a good one because of its size. Not the one that needs to be hung through 3, as Suvorov said, it seems.
      1. +17
        27 October 2017 07: 21
        Quote: Mikle1
        Not the one that needs to be hung after 3 years, as Suvorov said, it seems

        Peter the First. And not in three years, but
        Trade is a thief’s business, and therefore to appoint a miserable salary to them, and hang one per yearso that others are not unhappy
        1. +6
          27 October 2017 09: 42
          And that many hucksters and quartermasters were hanged? Furious Petrusha uttered a lot of all kinds of words, but he did things even more, which were not always useful for the Russian People. As for the theft, Danilych is full of handfuls of treasury lane and nothing.
          1. +22
            27 October 2017 09: 44
            Quote: Essex62
            Fizzy Petrusha ...

            You’re fit here, hike ... Yes
            Quote: Essex62
            affairs done even more, not always useful for the Russian People

            Not everything is useful to the "people", which is useful to the State. Give the "people" the opportunity - the "people" would still lie on the stove and spit on the ceiling. Not this way? wink
            Quote: Essex62
            As for the theft, Danilych is full of handfuls of treasury lane and nothing

            Danilitch and did useful things ... but what lane ... well, not without it, of course laughing
            1. +5
              27 October 2017 09: 51
              And you are not respected that this is an insult go? I ascertained a historical fact - the lover of Goands and nemchury suffered epilepsy.
              1. +9
                27 October 2017 10: 07
                Quote: Essex62
                I stated a historical fact

                And I ascertained a medical fact - your comment clearly smells, ahem ... mental illness request

                IMHO, naturally laughing
                1. +2
                  27 October 2017 10: 33
                  And all of us from the earliest times have been rooting for the Motherland and the people. Got a puppy?
                  1. +10
                    27 October 2017 10: 56
                    Quote: Essex62
                    And we are all from the earliest times

                    If 62 is the year of birth, then we are the same age. And I'm older anyway since January wink
                    Quote: Essex62
                    ... we are rooting for the Motherland and the people ...

                    No need to "hurt your soul," it’s better to make a useful thread ... but you don’t know how to hike request
                    Quote: Essex62
                    Got a puppy?

                    You yourself ... puppy laughing
                    1. +2
                      27 October 2017 11: 39
                      To go on an insult to an unknown person, not agreeing with his opinion, is foolishness. It does not fit an adult, he speaks of limitedness. But in life, I did something, not for you to judge.
                      1. +9
                        27 October 2017 12: 22
                        Quote: Essex62
                        Switch to insult an unknown person

                        I didn’t insult you, you thought
                        Quote: Essex62
                        It does not fit an adult, speaks of limitation

                        Requiescat in pace (c)
                      2. AUL
                        0
                        28 October 2017 13: 16
                        Essex62 , in vain are you trying to explain something to this subject. He has such a service - to tear his pants to those who doubted the "party line". They are now, before the election, a lot of launched on the site, to form public opinion. That rude recklessly, fulfills the salary.
            2. +11
              27 October 2017 09: 59
              Quote: Golovan Jack
              Danilych and doing good things ..

              they beat him quite hard and forced him to redo Ali. Of course, this did not stop him, and he was loyal to the Tsar and the Fatherland, did not spare his stomach on the battlefield. It does not look like modern thieves ... those have no homeland.
              1. +6
                27 October 2017 10: 31
                Who cares? A thief is a thief. JV Stalin spent his whole life in one jacket, then in the uniform of a generalissimo. They buried in it, everything acquired is rewards, truth and bruliki were present in them. For almost 3 months, L. I. Brezhnev did not talk with his daughter when a scam with pebbles surfaced. Here is the true face of the leader of the Russian Land.
                1. +2
                  28 October 2017 10: 33
                  Nevertheless, there is a difference. Menshikov left the stolen in Russia, and his contribution to the growth of her power is noticeable (at least by the fact that he was often an advocate of "low people" from the arbitrariness of the boyars) he was a statesman and did not serve either the Swedish king or the Sultan, and the Russian oligarchy keeps the stolen offshore and betray Russia as soon as it presents an opportunity.
            3. +3
              27 October 2017 10: 10
              What is it you are not respected on the insults go? I ascertained a historical fact - an amateur of the Dutch and nemchur suffered epilepsy.
              And the state consists of people, that is, the people, exists for the people and not for the odious loner with the manners of a monster and devil worshiper. And I consider the slogan of 1917 "Down with the autocracy" very correct and relevant. The head of the country cannot treat the people like cattle, his people will sweep.
              1. +11
                27 October 2017 10: 34
                Quote: Essex62
                The head of the country cannot treat the people like cattle

                And who treats the people as cattle? What kind of "leader" is this? And with examples please Yes
                Quote: Essex62
                ... the state consists of people, i.e., people ...

                And the anthill is from ants ...
                Quote: Essex62
                ... exists for the people ...

                Naturally ... only when Cicero said, "To be free, you must obey the law."
                That is, not only the State for me, but I - for the State. Not this way? wink
                Quote: Essex62
                odious loner with the manners of a monster and devil worshiper

                And you still say - not paranoia ... She, she ... darling request
                1. 0
                  27 October 2017 11: 51
                  So about Pete I, which is the first. To believe - not to believe in evil spirits - is everyone's business, but many contemporaries left evidence of the covens that the possessed emperor, with his friend Lefort, arranged. Someone argues that the tsar carried out serious reforms, but at what cost to the Russian people. And there is evidence that he seriously considered bringing Russia to Catholicism. So we live under the Dutch baryzhy-trading flag, with oligarchs on the neck. And the rule of law must be socialist or you are from the farce, which in 91 climbed onto the streets of Moscow, and the grandfathers in the Kremlin found us an order to give evil to crush.
                2. 0
                  29 October 2017 18: 54
                  And who treats the people as cattle? What kind of "leader" is this? And with examples please


                  If we talk about the 17th year, then obviously we are talking about Nicholas the miraculous;)
                  Which is now a saint.

                  Well, so far he has danced mountains of corpses (more than a thousand) from his Alexander Garden at his coronation.

                  But he probably loved his people, he was just very funny and loved to dance.

                  Although watching "Matilda" "change" and the saint loved to walk too%)

                  -----------------
                  The word “change” is not suitable, but alas, moderators will not miss a suitable word.
                3. 0
                  30 October 2017 09: 14
                  Quote: Golovan Jack
                  Naturally ... only when Cicero said, "To be free, you must obey the law."
                  That is, not only the State for me, but I - for the State. Not this way?

                  No need to juggle, it was said that your personal freedom is limited only by the freedom of other people. Freedom of other people, not some State. The state cannot have any other interests except the aggregate interests of the population. Well, often the interests of the population are replaced by the interests of individual groups that seized power in the State, but this is already imbalances in implementation and it is stupid to focus on them.
            4. +1
              30 October 2017 09: 02
              Quote: Golovan Jack
              Not everything is useful to the "people", which is useful to the State. Give the "people" the opportunity - the "people" would still lie on the stove and spit on the ceiling. Not this way?

              And what is your state? And who decides that this state is useful? Oh, and the poor State is unlucky with its subjects, lazy to horror, The state plows land and works at the factories, rows it in galleys for days, and people on the stove spit on the ceiling and still require some justice.
  5. +19
    27 October 2017 07: 27
    The author’s run towards EDR is counted.
    1. +4
      27 October 2017 09: 06
      Do not judge by yourself and do not confuse the presidential election with parliamentary elections - EdRo does not play here.
      1. +12
        27 October 2017 09: 24
        Do not take my comment to heart. Of course, we have fair elections (because there is essentially no one to choose from :)))). And of course EDRo is not a project of GDP in any way, it arose itself, you know the humidity in the Duma is high :)))
      2. +2
        27 October 2017 10: 51
        You're wrong, United Russia is hiding behind Putin, and he is covering them.
        1. +2
          30 October 2017 12: 11
          Quote: stas
          You're wrong, United Russia is hiding behind Putin, and he is covering them.

          EP is today the leading party in Russia, you can say anything about it, any critical reviews and exclamations, but the fact remains. Putin has been the leader of this party for many years, and he remains, although formally - Medvedev. He enlisted the support of the parliamentary majority and this is right and good, there are fewer conflicts and squabbles. With a long time of unconditional leadership of one party, there are advantages, such as systematic actions, the ability to build long-term plans, and the disadvantages include the fact that the party itself degenerates, overgrows with ballast, in the form of inert personalities that came exclusively for self-enrichment, a kind of swamping ... this the process is now going on ... Alas, this is inevitable, apparently it happened with the Communist Party ...
          1. +1
            30 October 2017 14: 13
            Quote: raw174
            EP is today the leading party in Russia, you can say anything about it, any critical reviews and exclamations, but the fact remains.

            If the EP is a party, then why does it live not on the contributions of members, but on subsidies from the budget? What is the purpose of the EP, where does the party lead, what is it building? Communist Party built communism, and EP what? What formation is supported by EP, socialism, capitalism, imperialism, oligarchy? You know? Me not. So far, it is clear that the main line is the "Approvers" of any GDP decision. A kind of demonstration of loyalty to GDP.
            1. +3
              30 October 2017 14: 28
              Quote: E_V_N
              If the EP is a party, then why does it live not on the contributions of members, but on subsidies from the budget?

              I don’t know exactly what he’s living on, but she’s the party ... Is there any data on subsidies?
              Quote: E_V_N
              What is the purpose of the EP, where does the party lead, what is it building?

              Honestly, I haven’t read the program ... But I think that a bright future ...
              Quote: E_V_N
              Communist Party built communism

              There is a result of construction ... To paraphrase a joke: The foreman was drunk and the construction failed ...
              Quote: E_V_N
              So far, it is clear that the main line is the "Approvers" of any GDP decision.

              My words in the post above: "He enlisted the support of the parliamentary majority and this is right and good, there are fewer conflicts and squabbles." Yes, the party is 100% supportive of the president.
    2. 0
      27 October 2017 10: 21
      About the relationship between the president and EdR:
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HqPJs1btC4Y
      Segment 10: 24-15.32
      1. +5
        27 October 2017 10: 39
        On the whole, I agree with the author on everything, though we still don’t see this “dismantling the EDR by brick”, as well as the thoughts “The President sees that the party is short-sighted and must be dispersed” can also be considered a personal opinion of the speaker. I know the topic a bit from the inside, because two comrades are deputies of the EDR of the local assembly, there is no smell of any concern for the population there. Window dressing is only before the elections, to put a cheaper playground, etc., all are busy supporting the interests of business.
        1. +1
          27 October 2017 12: 19
          I believe that there are parasites in any implemented scheme. The craving to "sit" higher under the sister wing of a real functionary is quite a property of primates. It’s not necessary to work (to move the brains for the good of society - their main task), pieces of paper can be taken apart for a couple of hours. And what do they have in the end?
          1) measures to maintain the attention of citizens on themselves,
          2) measures for lobbying the functionaries of their party to key places,
          3) overt parasitism on the resources of the motherland under the patronage of the "lords" of the party.
  6. +14
    27 October 2017 08: 14
    Everyone has the right to their opinion.
    Therefore, about it
    The president of Russia, popular in the homeland and beloved by voters, has much more valuable things in life.
    But comparing the present with Stalin is the height of shamelessness. How many schools and hospitals were built under Joseph Vissarionovich? And how much is considered ineffective at the present. What about Putin’s last words about co-financing? That is, now all medicine will be paid 100%. Who are Putin’s idols Gorbachev and Yeltsin. Gorbachev awarded, and in honor of Yeltsin he ransacked the center and is still going to build it. Isn't Putin kneeling before the Poles and apologizing to the Crimean Tatars? Wasn’t it during Putin’s time a partnership with foreign oligarchs, that is, money for the American bourgeois, and the Russian people will tolerate? Without taking into account anyone, they annexed Crimea, but suddenly they cannot restore order in the Donbass, and there is a suspicion that after the elections they will join Kiev.
    1. +1
      27 October 2017 10: 14
      This will not happen, except that the whole outskirts will be returned home to the Russian Empire. Together to Kiev.
    2. +3
      30 October 2017 12: 39
      Quote: Gardamir
      But comparing the present with Stalin is the height of shamelessness. How many schools and hospitals were built under Joseph Vissarionovich?

      Now they are also building, another question: is it necessary as much as was built then? There is an active process of urbanization, 30-50 students go to schools in villages, with a capacity of a thousand, they become empty, but in the cities they still build, in any case, in Chelyabinsk (a millionaire) you can get a child to school without problems, though it happens in a neighboring area ... Of course, it is necessary to build, especially in new microdistricts, but this work is also underway ... There is a bias, schools in the village are empty, it is time to close, and in the city they are crowded.
      Quote: Gardamir
      That is, now all medicine will be paid 100%.

      Where to get from? Assumptions? Let's hope that they do not materialize ...
      Quote: Gardamir
      They didn’t reckon with Crimea, but suddenly they can’t put things in order in the Donbass,

      And how can I put things in order? Declare war on Ukraine and be officially an aggressor? With Crimea, we took advantage of the opportunity very competently, but now is not the year 2014, there is no that mess in Kiev. And then the referendum would not have given such a result as in the Crimea, would not have gone to Russia so zealously ...
      1. 0
        30 October 2017 13: 00
        30-50 students go to school, with a capacity of a thousand,
        In my school years, 4 classes of 30 people. And now no one considers either homeless or unemployed, and surpluses have appeared.
        Assumptions?
        What are the assumptions. SAM said. Have you heard about co-financing?
        officially an aggressor?
        We are still considered an aggressor. But the Americans did not bomb all the peacekeepers. So does it really matter. And that was not the case. A long-prepared operation.
        1. +3
          30 October 2017 13: 19
          Quote: Gardamir
          And now no one considers either homeless or unemployed, and surpluses have appeared.

          There are really no schoolchildren in the villages, their parents left for the city, there are few highly paid jobs in the village, although there aren’t enough working hands ...
          Quote: Gardamir
          Have you heard about co-financing?

          Yes, but this is taken out of context ...
          Quote: Gardamir
          We are still considered an aggressor.

          No, just in words. Deuro we are not an aggressor, even the Council has not yet recognized ... And if we become an aggressor, this is a different calico, a different international relationship, even the allies will formally turn our backs ...
          Quote: Gardamir
          And that was not the case. A long-prepared operation.

          The script may have been, nevertheless, our base, but the case VERY contributed to ...
  7. +16
    27 October 2017 08: 21


    Although there are still no worthy candidates except for GDP ...
    1. +2
      27 October 2017 11: 01
      Here it is, the whole essence of the stupid American system that we imitate.
      1. +3
        30 October 2017 12: 41
        Quote: SERGUS
        Here it is, the whole essence of the stupid American system that we imitate.

        But were there options in the USSR? Was there a choice? And under the Empire? And when did you choose in Russia?
        1. 0
          31 October 2017 10: 17
          Quote: raw174
          But were there options in the USSR? Was there a choice? And under the Empire?

          No, neither during the USSR, nor even more so during the Empire there was a choice - and that was honestly, there was no choice either in fact or on paper! And now we, and in other democratic countries, I think not without it (Mark Twain didn’t just say that), it is on paper, but not in fact. That is why I wonder why we need this circus right now, like the people themselves choose their leader, we are Russians, smart people, for a quarter century we realized that he (the people) doesn’t choose anything, why do we need this show? Not Americans, I understand, they have the birthplace of Hollywood, they love the show, but we're not stupid?
          1. +2
            1 November 2017 06: 18
            I think that you will agree with me, but Putin really enjoys authority, maybe not 90%, but 60-70% of real support - this is a very real figure for today.
            1. 0
              1 November 2017 10: 57
              Quote: raw174
              I think that you will agree with me, but Putin really enjoys authority, maybe not 90%, but 60-70% of real support

              The fact that 60-70% really vote for him in the elections, I agree, but is it authority? If, for example, Russia introduces prohibitive duties on foreign cars, then the demand for the fret will increase at times, but this is not due to the fact that its quality will improve. So here, I hear more and more often that a person votes for GDP on the principle of the lesser evil of all. And I agree with those people who say that someone who is at least somehow standing with us before the election is simply not allowed.
              1. +2
                1 November 2017 12: 19
                Quote: SERGUS
                And I agree with those people who say that someone who is at least somehow standing with us before the election is simply not allowed.

                I repeat, they do not give power, they take it! If Putin cannot be thrown off, then HE is the king of the mountain, so there isn’t enough “toothy” ones. We (Russia) do not need a president - a weakling who needs to be dragged, we need a VAZHAK. If Putin has the strength to hold power, that means there is gunpowder in the flocks, then for a new term, all the more so since he did not do so little during his presidency. Russia of 1999 and Russia of 2017 are very different ...
                1. 0
                  2 November 2017 10: 21
                  Quote: raw174
                  If Putin cannot be thrown off, then HE is the king of the mountain, so there isn’t enough “toothy” ones.

                  Remember, I gave an example with cars, and here, if they can’t throw him off, it doesn’t mean that he is the best leader, but rather, as they say now, unfair competition with the use of administrative resources (about how he turned laughing ).
                  Quote: raw174
                  especially since during his presidency he did not so little.

                  I would even say he did a lot, but he did practically all the good things in his first two presidential terms, then he didn’t have any particular successes, with the exception of Crimea, but it’s 50/50 if it weren’t for a coup in Ukraine .. Thank you for responding quickly to Putin. And so recently we have been observing a certain stagnation (in the political sphere) as in the late USSR, the elites were snickering, lazy, etc. etc. Speaking of the USSR, Brezhnev was also an “indispensable person,” but it was from the end of his reign, I believe, that the political crisis in the USSR began.
                  Quote: raw174
                  I repeat, they do not give power, they take it!

                  I agree to all 100, we really have it, but again the question arises why this show called elections? Suppose, as before, the party elects a king or something. And there is still fear, since they take power from us and pass it on to successors, will there not be another revolution in 50 years from now (God forbid, of course)?
                  Quote: raw174
                  If Putin has the strength to hold power, then there is gunpowder in the flocks

                  Putin personally inspires respect from me, but he stopped the war in Chechnya, curbed unbelted oligarchs, etc. etc. But, I repeat once again, now we need to reform the liberal political system itself (hastily put together after the collapse of the USSR and which we adhere to this day), there are a lot of cases, and there is no time to rest on our laurels. Accordingly, either a new person is needed, or the GDP itself must do this, but lately, I repeat, we have not seen active action on the part of the president.
                  1. +2
                    2 November 2017 10: 40
                    Quote: SERGUS
                    Remember, I gave an example with cars, and here, if they can’t throw him off, it doesn’t mean that he is the best leader, but rather, as it is said now, unfair competition with the use of administrative resources (about how he turned down).

                    With the car, clearly, but not quite correctly, in my opinion. Regarding the administrative resource, duck here as in war, all means are good!
                    Quote: SERGUS
                    And so recently we have been observing a certain stagnation (in the political sphere) as in the late USSR, the elites were snickering, lazy, etc. etc.

                    Yes, another crisis has come upon me ... I think the last permutations of the leaders of the subjects, all these managerial contests and the creation of real personnel reserves are aimed at real "blood renewal", I think Putin will re-elect him and the cabinet will shred a bit ... As Lukashenko said, with his characteristic in a tone: "Personnel need to be peratrah from time to time"
                    Quote: SERGUS
                    why is this show called election?

                    The constitution decrees. For four years I was a member of the PEC (two of them were the chairman), before that I was an observer (a little extra), I had never seen a forgery and adjustment. Not on my site, not on others ... I think that where this takes place is a small-town initiative in order to curry favor, and not an order from above ...
                    Quote: SERGUS
                    whether in 50 years we will have another revolution

                    Yes easily! Putin came quietly and softly, and before him? Either a conspiracy, then a revolution, intrigue or forward kicking.
                    Quote: SERGUS
                    Accordingly, either a new person is needed, or the GDP itself must do this.

                    There will be a new one, there will certainly be more than once, but then! (paraphrased quote from K / F DMB) smile
                    1. 0
                      2 November 2017 14: 48
                      Quote: raw174
                      I think the last permutations of the leaders of the subjects, all these managerial contests and the creation of real personnel reserves are aimed at real "blood renewal"

                      It’s good that it’s aimed, but so far, all sorts of all-Russian popular fronts and other projects have not yielded results, only on the contrary, over time, they have become overgrown with all sorts of Poklonsky and the like. I see the failure of these projects, I repeat, in the imperfection of the liberal system itself, hastily put together after the collapse of the Union, which the GDP considers unshakable.
                      Quote: raw174
                      I think, having re-elected Putin, he will shred a little bit and the Cabinet ...

                      I look at our irreplaceable, irreplaceable chapter, and it’s not like such optimistic thoughts that do not enter my head.
    2. +5
      27 October 2017 11: 42
      Poor Russia, if it has only one tsar, on whom everything depends.
      But this was created by the Tsar himself, cleansed all politicians - no one but him.
      Even DAMU chose less than himself tall and without a king in his head.
  8. +12
    27 October 2017 08: 26
    The authorities in our country, apparently, have gotten into trouble - to turn the election of the president of a country such as Russia into a show and a farce, and to discredit them with such base candidates - it's just a delicious spit in the direction of the people. Say, eat this vileness with bags, we will throw some more to you. Formal mockery and diabolical cynicism of the authorities discourages!
  9. +4
    27 October 2017 08: 32
    Oh, the fun has begun! There is now a reason - the GDP will go to the polls or not, and if it does, then with what program, and if the program changes radically, then who will be the executors ... Well, then something like that. Journalists, political scientists, theologians, and other fortune-tellers work no end.
    1. +1
      27 October 2017 11: 33
      This "fun" began in the summer, just the wave went higher
      Zhirinovsky on the radio "Komsomolskaya Pravda" 17 July 2017 g. stated that GDP refused to participate in the 2018 elections.

      https://newsland.com/community/4765/content/putin
      -ne-poidet-na-vybory / 5919857
    2. +1
      27 October 2017 13: 57
      with which program, and if the program changes radically,
      Program ... This is just a piece of paper. Crushed and thrown out
  10. +7
    27 October 2017 08: 41
    I can assume (just assume) that the GDP, in the event of his non-election as president, will "suddenly" end up on a certain island in the Mediterranean Sea that he does not "own" and together with his friend Berlusconi will raise a toast there for the health of the new president of the Russian Federation .... wink
    1. +10
      27 October 2017 09: 07
      Again, you judge by the man in the street about happiness - your island, bags of money. And all this is necessary - there, over the hill.

      Too poor "Wishlist"
      1. +10
        27 October 2017 09: 19
        Yes, no .... I judge where all your last "presidents" are with their households and hangers-on. Or did they stay in Russia to live out their days? And by the way, where is the whole family of GDP now? Is it really all in Russia? wink
        1. +2
          27 October 2017 10: 02
          Quote: Monster_Fat
          I judge by where all your recent "presidents" are with their households and hangers-on

          power is a guarantee of security. Having passed, they will lose. Operation "receiver" may not give results. Although worth a try. I do not think it will be an island.
          1. +10
            27 October 2017 10: 08
            Quote: Catherine II
            Operation "receiver" may not produce results

            "Receiver" - definitely will not give a result. Here is the "successor", that may Yes
    2. +2
      27 October 2017 09: 31
      why does he need an island if the whole country is at the disposal of the islands? but Putin’s answer is whether the next president will be a woman alarmed.
      1. +3
        27 October 2017 09: 34
        why does he need an island if the whole country is at the disposal of the islands?
        Gorbachev also owned the country, but surrendered. And Yeltsin, in order to own, passed.
      2. The comment was deleted.
  11. +10
    27 October 2017 09: 37
    Is there life on Mars, isn’t it, we don’t know (s). Well, if in essence, the situation is quite understandable. In the 90s, the people enthusiastically said that we want capitalism and gratefully stuck his head in the yoke of the dominance of Western "values" and the power of the golden calf. So? So! Moreover, we did not enter this community on equal terms, but asked the West to allow us poor to sit from the edge. We have been integrated into the system of world capital supremacy as a third-rate country. So? So. Yes, in recent years we have become more sovereign. But sovereign only within the framework of their carriage, and within the whole composition of the capitalist train there is no, unlike China. Our existing political system has filters and obstacles that simply will not allow the leader who threatens the created system to appear. Moreover, under the supervision of the West, God forbid if we fail to happen and such a person appears. Then the west will harness up to physical destruction. But a whore, or some kind of bugger - please be a candidate. In this case, let the president be at least as patriotic as possible. Is Putin better in this field now? Unlikely. Better not talk about Zyuganov, this yap successfully saddled the communist niche, and milks it with success, provides its relatives with a beautiful, well-fed future. The rest of the trash would have looked more organically in the circus arena.
    1. +1
      27 October 2017 14: 17
      Quote: Just a human
      Is Putin better in this field now? Unlikely.

      Of course there are, but all the people are in charge, like Putin himself, and if there is a team, for example, to appoint Shaigu as president, I’m sure it will be the same and we will hear “Ah, where we should get better”.

      Why is this possible? Yes, because in the commodity country there can be no “lookers” other than our WOHR bully
      And there is no need to scratch turnips, power belongs to those who create or can appropriate material wealth, something like that.
      Another question is if mattresses will buy our VOKhR as in Iraq.
    2. 0
      30 October 2017 09: 34
      Quote: Just a man
      In the 90s, the people enthusiastically said that we want capitalism and gratefully stuck his head in the yoke of the dominance of Western "values" and the power of the golden calf. So? So!


      You really were in the 90s at a conscious age or do you know all this from books? In the 90s, no one promised capitalism, they talked about renewed socialism, and promised not to build socialism around the world at the expense of the people of the Russian Federation. True, there were separate "liberals" who quietly screamed "maybe we will build capitalism better?", But they were considered marginalized and especially did not pay attention to their whining. As it turned out in vain.
  12. +12
    27 October 2017 09: 50
    Well, the author licked so licked!
    1. +7
      27 October 2017 11: 43
      And such slogans in EP and in power.
      The king likes it and he openly talks about it when he praises our government.
      1. AUL
        0
        28 October 2017 13: 35
        And what do you want, the elections are on the nose! Such fleeting articles a couple of days must be printed. And the new visitors to the site got completely frenzied, who rush at everyone who doubts like a pack of jackals (do you have to indicate nicknames?). Normal campaign ...
  13. +6
    27 October 2017 10: 04
    I wonder what it is about, what kind of elections if the field has been cleansed of candidates for a long time.
    Or "Putin's election" or the operation "I'm tired, I'm leaving" with guarantees of the safety of myself and my family. The political field is virgin long ago. Any shoots have undergone strict weeding .. only frail their growth
  14. +1
    27 October 2017 10: 14
    No, it’s not for nothing that I dreamed today (really). We are going with a trolleybus with Putin. We have an accident, a trolley bus moved a man in Zhiguli. Putin provides first aid. It makes promises to figure it out.
    Putin is everywhere. I think so.
    Specifically, according to the subject, the best option is to introduce a position of vice president for him. Nominate a decent man for president, such as Shoigu or Lavrov. And clowns should not be allowed until the election for medical reasons. And let the "partners" howl, it's our business!
  15. +7
    27 October 2017 10: 29
    Quote: B.T.W.
    Quote: Stas157
    Ksenia Sobchak invited the lonely famous


    You, with a probability of 100%, are sure that "Ksyusha is the Kremlin's project" ?!

    More than sure that Sobakin's joy, nicknamed Ksyusha, is a Kremlin project, they need an appearance at the polls.
    In the last election, less than 50% came, but what's the point of going to new elections if everything is already decided.
    Why spend money.
    The election turned into a farce.
    Putin needs a new economic program - building a social socialist state, not a market flea market with Putin's face.
  16. +1
    27 October 2017 10: 54
    All this crap ... Putin will leave only in 2024 ... then, if I’m wrong, I can spread rot ... but Putin will be in 2024
  17. 0
    27 October 2017 10: 56
    Well, the analyst ... Putin ALREADY GOES FOR THE ELECTIONS, AS HOW THE PERIOD OF THE INTRODUCTION AND CRIMPING OF A NEW CANDIDATE IS PASSED
  18. +9
    27 October 2017 10: 58
    To “transfer” presidential power into “reliable hands” is necessary, at a minimum. the presence and presentation to the population of those same "reliable hands."
    But they are not. Neither in the immediate environment, nor in the distant.
    Any candidate should be made public. It is advisable every day. Preferably with serious deeds and successes.
    So Putin will not bother with such problems.
    And Medvedev with his clan will not be so easy to remove.
    And we will contemplate this couple of "sworn friends" for a long time to come.
    1. +1
      27 October 2017 14: 30
      Any candidate should be made public. It is advisable every day. Preferably with serious deeds and successes.
      Well yes! We at EBN heard and listened about Putin every day.
  19. +2
    27 October 2017 11: 08
    Remember the feint of Ivan the Terrible. He put the Busurman prince in the Kremlin, and himself in the monastery. Then the prince under the knife (I do not remember exactly), and under the enthusiastic cries of the people again on the throne.
    1. 0
      27 October 2017 11: 39
      Remember the trick of Ivan the Terrible? He put Basurmansky Tsarevich in the Kremlin, and himself in a monastery. Tired of de. Then the prince, under the knife and under the enthusiastic cries of the "people", again sat on the throne. This begs the question, and who is your "Basurman prince"? Or a princess? Cleared from the "left" candidates glade, does not give a definite answer. Most likely it will be a “friend”, who owes his fortune and position on the “coffin of life” to the current owner of the Kremlin.
  20. +9
    27 October 2017 11: 18
    Well, comparing Putin and STALIN is really cool, one has 15 to 40 %% of GDP per year during the period of industrialization, by December 31, 1940, the growth of the USSR’s GDP compared to tsarist Russia in 1913 had more than 24 times, although the situation is the world was much worse, the blockade of the country, the devastation, 5% of the population was literate, etc. .. Here is the start of one and what he achieved and what he achieved the other, the GDP of the RSFSR of 1990 can not surpass. I don’t want to talk about anything else, corruption, idleness and chatter about cohesion and a bright future.
    1. +2
      27 October 2017 11: 54
      Yeah, the author would immediately specify what Putin will leave the country with the pipe? fellow
  21. 0
    27 October 2017 11: 20
    Which sucked "This" out of the finger. Are the Jews crap? Clear.
  22. +7
    27 October 2017 11: 21
    Today, the current president of Russia has every chance to enter the latest history of Russia with no less baggage than Stalin.
    After this phrase, to delve into the contents of the opus already got sick. But ... the "deflection" is counted.
  23. +4
    27 October 2017 11: 39
    Quote: Monster_Fat
    will be on a certain island

    Neither money, nor a separate island with affectionate gourias and lackeys in liveries will replace the sweetest sense of possessing absolute power. fellow
    I know for myself. feel
    Just kidding, of course.
  24. +2
    27 October 2017 11: 42
    Not for that, Putin won the world to take and leave just like that .... He will go to the polls, definitely .... Yes, and no one else .... everyone else is a solid ford ...
    1. +6
      27 October 2017 12: 31
      Why Soviet symbolism? The country should be painted in tricolor, and instead of symbols of labor, crossed packs of money.
      1. 0
        28 October 2017 08: 43
        As an option, maybe .... Ah ?? smile
  25. +2
    27 October 2017 11: 56
    First of all, we will expose the myth of tens of billions of dollars, euros and moggles stored in GDP in the West. This is how only losers judging by their unrealizable dreams think. Since the “civilized West” began a third century ago to withdraw money of any person without a court decision, banks not only provide information about customers, but also participate in the withdrawal of funds ... understandably. If we consider that the disagreeable US politicians come under attack, Gaddafi and Hussein are an example of this, the values ​​in the West are held by “aristocrats and degenerates”.
    Oh, I can’t, but where can I keep it? In China?! Well, they all rush to the West as soon as possible, they get citizenship there (the same Usmanov)
  26. +3
    27 October 2017 11: 59
    Quote: the most important
    Quote: To be or not to be
    He spent all of October in various forums:
    - gives a deep assessment of the situation in the world. and ways out of this situation
    - assesses the internal state of Russia. Talks about its development trends and new directions of movement
    - Raises the issue of social protection of the population. and already gave the command to increase pensions since 2018, including the military
    What is this if not candidate programs for a new term ??
    "The horses at the crossing do not change, is not it?"

    He’s already 17 years old in all forums ... but GDP isn’t growing .... Ukraine was captured by Bandera ... medicine, education industry is in ruin ... a third of the population are poor ... Kazakhstan goes to Latin ... Crimea does not recognize not a single CIS ally ... debts to all countries are written off ... NATO tanks in the Baltic states ... do not index pensions for working pensioners ... Zenit-arena costs more than the budget of most regions of Russia .. clumsy footballers will not win a single match (forecast ), and billions will go to a feast during the plague, and at that time 211 (think about it !!!) children died in 1017 on physical education from a collapsed football goal and undetected diseases ... they collect money for treatment of children via SMS, and bent-legged football players, effective managers of state-owned companies receive several million a day ..

    I don’t understand how you live with it. request and still not drunk up the wall? crying ... see helmet while saving soldier ))))
  27. +1
    27 October 2017 12: 07
    The brave soldier Schweik would simply say: "Never before has it been like this, so that somehow it never happened."
  28. +1
    27 October 2017 12: 13
    Quote: the most important
    He’s already 17 years old in all forums ... but GDP isn’t growing .... Ukraine was captured by Bandera ... medicine, education industry is in ruin ... a third of the population are poor ... Kazakhstan goes to Latin ... Crimea does not recognize not a single CIS ally ... debts to all countries are written off ... NATO tanks in the Baltic states ... do not index pensions for working pensioners ... Zenit-arena costs more than the budget of most regions of Russia .. clumsy footballers will not win a single match (forecast ), and billions will go to a feast during the plague, and at that time 211 (think about it !!!) children died in 1017 on physical education from a collapsed football goal and undetected diseases ... they collect money for treatment of children via SMS, and bent-legged football players, effective managers of state-owned companies receive several million a day ..

    ...
    mister lie?
    Examine the question at least in pictures.
    ...
    And what does Putin have to do with it? This is not our country.
    ...
    those. to Putin they were on the rise or something ???
    ...
    similarly, before the GDP, everyone was millionaires and suddenly became paupers, scored 2 cars and went to resorts.
    ...
    Kazakhstan and Putin .. ??? Should he make Kazakhs learn Russian ??
    ...
    Are you taking the cuckoo out of your head or something ..
    1. 0
      30 October 2017 09: 43
      Quote: Foxmara
      And what does Putin have to do with it? This is not our country.

      I am in charge of you, but if anything, I have nothing to do with it, you should know. Originally.
  29. +7
    27 October 2017 12: 24
    First paragraph The author turns out that Putin does not keep money in the West, because they can take it away. Ask the author - where is he then?
    Second paragraph. All the less popular and beloved (hmmm?), Due to its incredible inaction and the gradual decline in living standards.
    Third paragraph Someone has already estimated that the money profaned during Putin’s rule would have been enough for Stalin for 4-5 industrializations.
    Sixth paragraph. The decisions of the "true leader" are so strongly put by his "associates" that it is no longer funny. Presidential orders are carried out by several percent.
    1. +2
      27 October 2017 15: 09
      Dear groks, maybe you are right in your thoughts, maybe you have more information than the author of the article, I will tell you from the bottom of my heart that I live more comfortably with this presidency. The truth is, there’s no one to compare his activities with. Sorry, but the previous two individuals, even perceived as Westerners. And one more note and pondering - our president is making a foreign policy and he ran into it, and he succeeds there. You hear howls from behind a hill. He beautifully conducts foreign policy, really beautiful. Those who have eyes see this and understand that everything is very difficult and burdensome. Chinese comrades recently told me that if PUTIN were their president, they would bring the whole world to their knees. And this is almost an axiom. But with the prime minister we were not lucky. It is not and there is no domestic policy in the country and complete crap flourishes unfortunately. Now, I apologize, do you see or hear our dear prime minister? There is a mess in the country, and from it there is dead silence and complete indifference. I don’t understand why the president in this direction is not harsh, like not a wimp, but also not STALIN, it is a fact. It’s good, even though now he directly controls the army, but Shoigu seems to have come to a place. Incredibly difficult for the president, he has chosen foreign policy as a priority for himself. Maybe he is right, I do not presume to judge, but when Stalin was closed from the outside world. It allowed the world currency and the FRS to appear / to be honest, a fantastically smart system / I created my own socialist world and in the end we lost. I think the world should not be closed ./ It's like a zone. Either you take a worthy place, or they will use you and have everyone who wants to. / Now we are taking away what has always belonged to us and I am very sorry if you assume that someone above us can be. I am a Russian imperialist. ABOVE US ONLY STARS!
      1. +3
        27 October 2017 15: 48
        I wrote about what I saw in the article. And about what I see around.
        We really have no one to compare. But I would like all the same, so that the country's leadership would not forget about this very country. So that there are visible and perceived results.
        It seems to me. For me. That with foreign policy we have the same paragraph as with domestic. Putin says, as a normal person, and not as a politician, it is interesting to listen to him, he says the right thing. He is demonized and praised at the same time in the West (which has already begun to strain). But it is not noticeable that someone in the west listened to him. If something happens, then it is so deep that we will never know. Even Crimea and Syria look weird, since no one wants to recognize Crimea yet (and who acknowledged it, we suddenly supported the sanctions against it), and the second leaves a lot of maneuver to the West - will they do puppet Syria-2 and what then to do?
        The Chinese see even less of us and they want more freedom - well, how we wanted "change."
        Someone behind all the big politicians. If different forces stood behind Putin and Medvedev, then some kind of confrontation would probably be visible. Is it there? No. They both suit our elite. Therefore, it is not tough.
        Shoigu while riding on the achievements of Serdyukov, he himself did not do anything sensible. But huge thefts at the 51st arsenal already happened with him.
        Well, even if foreign policy were extremely successful, then it is impossible to arrange such a madhouse inside. They will bow in Washington and sweep away their hungry.
        This is not to say that Stalin closed. It was closed from the USSR. Especially under Stalin they closed. Since the results demonstrated by the Stalinist USSR were extremely dangerous for the West. The Bretton Woods of the USSR did not ratify. The USSR was not able to do anything in that situation with this.
        The USSR did not lose; it was defeated by the efforts of both external and internal enemies. It is difficult to expect victory from a boxer, even if he is Stevenson, if the opponent has a kilo nut in the glove, if the judges are biased and if his own trainer grabs his legs.
        Russia only succeeded when, at least as far as it began to close itself from the west. Now protectionism would be very out of place.
        I don’t see us taking anything. Crimea, until it is recognized - a kettle without a handle.

        Patriotism is not tantamount to hatred and scam.
        1. 0
          30 October 2017 10: 00
          Quote: groks
          Shoigu while riding on the achievements of Serdyukov, he himself did not do anything sensible. But huge thefts at the 51st arsenal already happened with him.

          51 arsenal is precisely Serdyukov’s “best practices”, there is no need to blame Shoigu, the defense minister should not deal with the problem of each arsenal. Under Serdyukov, dozens of troops disbanded, while under Shoigu the real rearmament began, do you catch the difference?
          1. 0
            30 October 2017 20: 07
            51st is the last couple of years. And Serdyukov no edge. When it comes to a few billion, then without a minister this MUST NOT be decided.
            When Serdyukov disbanded - who argues. That's just all of the current missiles made under Serdyukov. Made with a huge overpayment, with a cut, but made. Everything that was done according to self-propelled guns was done under Serdyukov - then the directors of the factories shoved the money almost in time, just to speed up the production. Shoigu just does not even have time for any rearmament.
            I. Serdyukov disbanded for a reason. He got everything in such a state that there were no other options. To consider that it was a collapse is ridiculous. These were very unpleasant reforms, which were more profitable to imagine a collapse. And the reforms were brilliant. For which Serdyukov received permission to warm their hands a little. Some really could not stop ....
            But Shoigu still has nothing to blame, not to praise. He didn’t even cut the barrel off the Coalition. And - well, all manufacturers of armored vehicles are bankrupt, so here the Moscow Region does not play the main violin. And stubbornly talk about conversion. For the rearmament is over (how can this be at all?). Alles Kaput.
            This is not to say that Serdyukov is well done, but Shoigu on the contrary. Both carry out tasks. It's just that Serdyukov's task was immeasurably more complex and unpleasant.
      2. 0
        27 October 2017 16: 54
        but the previous two individuals, even for people perceive the West
        And the present respects them. It turns out you live in a fantasy world. Either the president is responsible for the army yourself, or he cannot cope with the fifth and other columns.
      3. 0
        30 October 2017 09: 53
        Quote: MAGorkiy
        Dear groks, maybe you are right in your thoughts, maybe you have more information than the author of the article, I will tell you from the bottom of my heart that I live more comfortably with this presidency. The truth is, there’s no one to compare his activities with. Sorry, but the previous two individuals, even perceived as Westerners. And one more note and pondering - our president is making a foreign policy and he ran into it, and he succeeds there. You hear howls from behind a hill. He beautifully conducts foreign policy, really beautiful. Those who have eyes see this and understand that everything is very difficult and burdensome. Chinese comrades recently told me that if PUTIN were their president, they would bring the whole world to their knees. And this is almost an axiom. But with the prime minister we were not lucky. It is not and there is no domestic policy in the country and complete crap flourishes unfortunately. Now, I apologize, do you see or hear our dear prime minister? There is a mess in the country, and from it there is dead silence and complete indifference. I don’t understand why the president in this direction is not harsh, like not a wimp, but also not STALIN, it is a fact. It’s good, even though now he directly controls the army, but Shoigu seems to have come to a place. Incredibly difficult for the president, he has chosen foreign policy as a priority for himself. Maybe he is right, I do not presume to judge, but when Stalin was closed from the outside world. It allowed the world currency and the FRS to appear / to be honest, a fantastically smart system / I created my own socialist world and in the end we lost. I think the world should not be closed ./ It's like a zone. Either you take a worthy place, or they will use you and have everyone who wants to. / Now we are taking away what has always belonged to us and I am very sorry if you assume that someone above us can be. I am a Russian imperialist. ABOVE US ONLY STARS!

        For 4 years, the GDP has already worked as Prime Minister, but there was no breakthrough in domestic politics then.
        Why DEM, something to say or strain, everything is already on the “manual control” of the GDP,
        The Chinese comrades correctly told you that with a strong economy (like in China) and a strong foreign policy (like in the Russian Federation) the whole world can be brought to its knees. Only you did not understand that one cannot exist without the other; without a strong economy, all attempts trite the whistle.
        I am also for Russia, otherwise I would not give a damn what is going on in it and who is doing it.
  30. 0
    27 October 2017 12: 36
    Whatever candidate you have, Russians, he will not be a candidate from Tatars, Mari, Chuvash, Kalmyks and Udmurts! He will not be a candidate from the Balkars, Kabardians, numerous Dagestan peoples, Chechens and Ingush with the Crimean Tatars! Choose your candidate and president, as you can, even Nevsky, even Sobchak, he will never be ours! It is time for you to create your own republic and choose your Nursultan Nazarbayev or Mintimer Shaimiev! Otherwise, the Jews will rule you. But we do not need Jews!
    1. +3
      27 October 2017 15: 12
      What are you talking about ? Please clarify.
      1. 0
        27 October 2017 15: 41
        This depositor works on articles 280 and 282 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. It works well, by the way, the relevant authorities can take it so quickly. And for the cause.
      2. +1
        27 October 2017 15: 51
        It is the Jews that bother him. Khariton, Zeldovich, Fisanovich, all 150 Heroes of the Soviet Union in the Second World War interfere. The fascist is shorter.
    2. +3
      27 October 2017 15: 57
      Teeek ... Even if we do not take into account the obvious calls for violation of territorial integrity (article 280 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation), then the comment is either “a person on a salary” or an explicit patient on “ward No. 6” on the run.
      Quote: Gennady Fedorov
      he will not be a candidate from Tatars, Mari, Chuvash, Kalmyks and Udmurts

      These peoples have autonomous republics where a local president is elected.
      Quote: Gennady Fedorov
      Balkarians, Kabardins, numerous Dagestan peoples, Chechens and Ingush

      Similarly, however, some peoples live in one republic.
      Quote: Gennady Fedorov
      Crimean Tatars

      This is generally 5!
      Quote: Gennady Fedorov
      Choose your candidate and president, as you can, even Nevsky, even Sobchak, he will never be ours!

      Whose is yours?
      Quote: Gennady Fedorov
      It is time for you to create your own republic and choose your Nursultan Nazarbayev or Mintimer Shaimiev!

      Who is this for you? Russian? The most numerous people of the Russian Federation? State-forming? Yes, psychiatrists cry for you, candidates for a doctor of medical sciences generally cry ...
      Quote: Gennady Fedorov
      Otherwise, the Jews will rule you.

      You - Kemi?
      Quote: Gennady Fedorov
      But we do not need Jews!

      Who is this for you?


      Total, an individual with the nickname "Gennady Fedorov" (Russian name and surname, it seems) is an unwise person (or even a pest, such as aphids).
  31. +8
    27 October 2017 13: 15
    First of all, we will expose the myth of tens of billions of dollars, euros and Tugriks stored in GDP in the West. So think only losers judging by their pipe dreams. Since a third century ago, the "civilized West" began to withdraw money from any person without a court order, and banks not only provide information about customers, but also participate in the withdrawal of funds ...

    A sort of unemployed., Living on a salary. A man who gives friends to earn 5 trillion rubles on state orders for several years receives 800 thousand salaries and sets aside for a "rainy day" lol Author, do you yourself believe in what you wrote?
  32. +3
    27 October 2017 13: 18
    If someone thinks that immediately after the GDP, a golden age will begin in the country, because a person will come to power who tells you on YouTube how much money and summer cottages are or how to build love on a TV channel, while they themselves have a snout in a gun, then I wish you good luck, you will be disappointed in 5 years, when the next wave of oligarchy swallows, then we begin to arrange Maidan, in short everything will be according to the “scenario”! maybe not so many hospitals, schools and kindergartens were built, but they were built, and I want to tell you not little, given the previous years of the “90s,” a lot has changed dramatically in the country, who worked and lived in those years, he knows what was going on, how “they paid salaries and how they valued personnel”, but I remember, and I don’t want the usual hard workers fall into such a heavy burden, and we have a lot of them, the GDP communicates with the people, who knows how to breathe in the country and abroad, I don’t praise him, but what he has done for our present country has not yet been done, I’d like to look at other managers, but I don’t want to take risks!
    1. 0
      27 October 2017 15: 55
      Just a moment. It is our authorities that pour the soil under the feet of this storyteller about money and cottages. What has changed - of course. If oil goes for $ 300, then it may be good again. But now the change is not for the better.
    2. +2
      29 October 2017 22: 29
      GDP communicates with people knows who breathes with what in the country

      People are right better to live from his knowledge. Only Rotenbergs.
      schools and kindergartens but they were built, and I want to tell you quite a few

      That's when Putin closed 20 thousand schools in the countryside
  33. +1
    27 October 2017 13: 48
    Quote: To be or not to be
    Horses do not change at the crossing, is not it? "

    I heard this from M. Ulyanov about Gorbachev. Result known
  34. +2
    27 October 2017 13: 50
    Quote: Dmitrik
    Yes, and no one else .... everyone else is a continuous wade ...

    who really removed the competitors? Pushkin?
  35. 0
    27 October 2017 13: 50
    I don’t know, but I see at least a couple of candidates besides Vladimir Putin — these are Shoigu and Sobyanin. It is possible that Shoigu will become the next President. And about the pyramid of power and dullness in it, look at the United States, if you are not a member of an elite team, then you will find D. Trump’s fate on which all the dogs were hung.
  36. 0
    27 October 2017 14: 02
    You spell out Mikle1 well. But superficially. This is already visible to everyone. But I think that the president will now go to the polls and over the next term will complete everything that he planned. Sechvs peak of his ideas and you can’t leave them. Yes, and he seems to have a team, but there is something he cannot see as a follower of his ideas. And then he will be the permanent premier and will beautifully direct and help his successor. / unless, of course, something is invented that bypasses the constitution, and if health allows /
  37. +15
    27 October 2017 14: 33
    Putin will not go to the polls next year

    Even if we ask? laughing
  38. 0
    27 October 2017 14: 37
    Well, take the moment that in our country only 45% of the population vote, the rest will simply be distributed (possibly in equal shares).
    The second point is that the liberals must vote, in contrast to the inert people, who do not know what elections are. that is, the percentage of liberals will rise, as happened in Yekaterinburg with Roizman.
    Third, Putin will not run for three consecutive terms. What essentially prohibits the constitution for more than two consecutive terms.
    Fourthly, by 2024, and maybe even earlier, candidates for promotion to the presidency are already being determined.
    1. +1
      27 October 2017 14: 43
      Quote: Macross
      Third, Putin will not run for three consecutive terms. What essentially prohibits the constitution for more than two consecutive terms.




      The constitution prohibits generally more than two terms ... not only in a row ... but did it interfere?
      1. 0
        27 October 2017 15: 59
        Quote: Gransasso
        The constitution prohibits generally more than two terms ... not only in a row ...

        Exactly what in a row.
  39. The comment was deleted.
  40. 0
    27 October 2017 15: 08
    He brewed such a mess that he crossed out all his useful affairs. Ideally, it was necessary to bring down after the first term. Now they would remember only good ...
  41. +5
    27 October 2017 17: 04
    Putin will go to the polls. Because everyone was buzzing already. And give compensation and give out pensions. True, along the way it turned out that in Russia people again work without a salary. Who will manage to get that well done before the election.
    As for the clowns. Only a completely stupid one can assume that the Kremlin has nothing to do with it. Bulk already earned more than one term, but do not plant. Why cherish? And Ksyusha nominated herself as a candidate after meeting with a close family member. Also by accident? Already Ksyusha Poklonskaya spins in the same way as she untwisted Matilda.
    Question to Putin's supporters. You can not speak with slogans, but bring as an example at least one real thing, when he did something for the people?
    1. +1
      27 October 2017 19: 19
      Do you rank yourself among the people? So I am the people and began to live better in comparison with Yeltsin and Gorbachev. Have you become worse off? Offer a new president. Do you have in stock? Or maybe we will return Gorbach? He has done a lot for the people.
      1. +4
        27 October 2017 20: 20
        Here I am the people
        and I am the people. And I remember the nation state. If simplified, Gorbachev started a coup, but until 1987 there were almost no changes. Yeltsin waged eight years of civil war. Therefore, there is no need to frighten 90mi, and it is so clear that war is nothing good. And Putin is building a developed oligarcho-kleptocratic capitalism. And there’s nothing good about it.
        For anyone I live worse than under the Soviet regime. Although how do you measure these better or worse?
    2. +1
      28 October 2017 19: 11
      What have you done? I’m the mother. If I sit down somewhere. people will start approaching me with their stories - to cry in a vest. I'm listening. I just love people and regret it. Once, an old man, a former officer, told me how his wife was dying. He had a terrible grief. He had no one He carried it in himself, but he told me that it became easier for him. And Putin, too, protects everyone, the whole country as best he can, and we have peace and quiet. That's the most important thing that he did for the people .He gives all his strength to this. See how he lives. Would you like to live like that? He doesn’t belong to himself at all. Like a squirrel in a wheel. Why don’t you appreciate it? He alone cannot solve all the problems of the country. He cannot by decree eliminate capitalism.
  42. 0
    27 October 2017 17: 17
    Quote: Gardamir
    and bring as an example at least one real thing

    Crimea took
    1. 0
      27 October 2017 17: 44
      Crimea took
      Crimea was annexed to Russia as a result of a referendum. The people of Crimea showed their will.
      1. 0
        27 October 2017 19: 46
        Yeah, Catalonia gained independence, the Golan gave to the Arabs, where else were there expressions of will? And they all got it as they wanted))
  43. +3
    27 October 2017 17: 40


    here is the answer to the bourgeoisie of Russia.
  44. +1
    27 October 2017 18: 06
    :-))) Cool article! Noah, I think the main reason for its appearance is just the trolling of the readers of the site! In order to further provoke Putin’s rejection!
  45. 0
    27 October 2017 19: 13
    Yes, to compare with Stalin, damn it’s generally cool, you still have to grow up to it, until only knees
  46. 0
    28 October 2017 08: 30
    Quote: Overlock
    Quote: Dmitrik
    Yes, and no one else .... everyone else is a continuous wade ...

    who really removed the competitors? Pushkin?

    No, Pushkin has nothing to do with it, of course ... Although I am not a supporter of Putin .... I have a lot of unpleasant questions for him .... However, he is the only real candidate for this post .... All the rest yourself, neither give, not take .... Or maybe you wish victory Sobchak or Bulk ???
  47. +8
    28 October 2017 13: 52
    AUL
    Quote from AUL
    Essex62 , in vain are you trying to explain something to this subject. He has such a service - to tear his pants to those who doubted the "party line". They are now, before the election, a lot of launched on the site, to form public opinion. That rude recklessly, fulfills the salary.

    Uh, buddy ... squeeze a sting, otherwise it’s like not to offend ... inadvertently wink
    You are rude now (you don’t pull, call me).
    Hamil deer under the nickname Essex62:
    Quote: Essex62
    Furious Petrusha uttered a lot of all kinds of words, but did things even more, not always useful for the Russian People

    This, by the way, is about Peter the Great, without which it is not known whether Russia would have existed at all or not.
    As for my service, it’s not your business, kid. I can only say one thing - here I am not serving, I’m here ... resting, practicing fellow
    1. 0
      30 October 2017 10: 16
      Quote: Golovan Jack
      As for my service, it’s not your business, kid. I can only say one thing - here I am not serving, I’m here ... resting, practicing

      On your profile picture you have a doggie, doggie for a stew and a piece of sugar "service" are sometimes resting, "practicing" sticking out their tongue ... do you say about this "service"? Judging by the way you “bite and bite” everyone here, for some reason it seems to me that I'm right.
  48. 0
    28 October 2017 16: 44
    I give my forecast. Putin will go to the polls, win and sit another term, forming a completely new team and training the new future president as prime minister. for there is no one but Putin to remove all his old friends from the feeder.
    And Putin will go to the polls as a self-nominated candidate, without the help of the EP and officials, so that during the "purge" there will be nothing to anyone.
    Well, his health is nothing so far, yes. It is quite useful for the post of UN Secretary General.
    1. 0
      29 October 2017 02: 03
      But my forecast will not work, she will put the SHEEP DOG, who will jump to his tune, just like MEDVEDEV, by the way, not only to him !! The main thing is to show that there is supposedly democracy in the country and so on!
    2. 0
      29 October 2017 11: 42
      I agree !!! So it will be !!! Putin will go to the polls and will probably participate in the pre-election debates live !!!
  49. +1
    28 October 2017 18: 52
    I don’t understand why Sobchak is going to the polls. How did this ever become possible? After all, she was the host of House 2. This program because of which I refused the TV many years ago. I still do not have it. This is important. I promised myself that I will not have a TV in the house while there there is this transmission. Women have a more responsible role in society than men who are essentially children. A woman is not just a keeper of a hearth. She is a keeper of morality, chastity in society. If morality is destroyed, society perishes. Western society is on the verge of destruction. Why did everyone somehow forget that a woman should protect her chastity, remain innocent until marriage, protect her innocence by becoming a widow or divorcing her husband, if she has children. She is a mother. Many have such poisoned brains that they begin to think, if a woman is alone, it cannot be that she has no one. Well, or she is a lesbian. And even jealous wives think so. So chastity of men is lamented. And Sobchak actively participated in the crushing chastity of all, even children, who watched this program in the absence of their parents.
    1. 0
      29 October 2017 11: 41
      She (Ksyusha) will receive money from the election campaign !!!
  50. 0
    28 October 2017 19: 13
    Yeltsinoid had no choice? feel
  51. +2
    29 October 2017 02: 01
    The question is, why then do they ALL AND THE SAME VOLODY have real estate over the hill and not a small one, why almost everyone has several citizenships and EVERYONE has children over the hill, AS WELL AS THEIR ACCOUNTS and EVERYTHING REST IS A TALE FOR SRAMS - LOOK IN THE VATICAN BANK!!
  52. The comment was deleted.
  53. 0
    29 October 2017 11: 40
    If not Putin? So who???? Shoigu?
    1. +2
      29 October 2017 20: 35
      "If not Yeltsin, then who?!" 1996 And Putimon will nominate himself and won’t ask us.
  54. 0
    29 October 2017 12: 17
    I wonder what Russia would be like now if Yeltsin had chosen Chernomyrdin as his successor rather than Putin. He, of course, was a boletus man, but this was not his fault, but Yeltsin’s, who agreed to accept Berezovsky’s financial assistance before the elections. But if Putin does not take part in the elections, then it is not at all clear who to vote for. It is clear that Medvedev will become president again, but there is little good in this. He is a weak leader.
  55. kig
    0
    29 October 2017 13: 21
    I read it carefully and didn’t understand anything. Why should he leave? Why not stay for a second term? The Constitution allows it.
  56. kig
    0
    29 October 2017 14: 06
    Why, say, is this option not possible?
  57. 0
    29 October 2017 18: 25
    Quote: Gardamir
    Let these go, who are not to blame for anything and are not responsible for anything.

    Are you sure that those who are better will come? And who are these “best”? Or will another Gorbachev appear and Russia will be left in bloody pieces?
    1. +8
      29 October 2017 18: 28
      Quote: dmitry.kashkaryow
      Are you sure that those who are better will come?

      Quote: Pessimist and Optimist

      Pessimist: - Everything is so bad that it can’t get worse!
      Optimist: - Maybe, maybe!!!

      Gardamir in this case - in the role of a Pessimist.
    2. +1
      29 October 2017 19: 34
      another Gorbachev will appear
      Are you sure that “Gorbachev” is not in power now?
      1. +7
        29 October 2017 19: 50
        Quote: Gardamir
        another Gorbachev will appear
        Are you sure that “Gorbachev” is not in power now?

        Gardamir, Your imagination...is amazing at times request
        Well, I, by example, am sure that “not Gorbachev” is in power... objections, additions?
        1. 0
          29 October 2017 20: 24
          objections,
          For what? What is good for you personally, for your loved ones? Great foreign policy?
        2. 0
          30 October 2017 08: 21
          Quote: Golovan Jack
          Well, I, by example, am sure that “not Gorbachev” is in power... objections, additions?

          I have respect for Putin, but who is to blame for the dominance of foreign capital in Russia? for example, the Nestle and Coca Cola corporations. They loudly declare that the products they sell consist of 80% local raw materials and packaging materials, measuring these percentages in weight quantities (what's the point of transporting water?). But 80% of the cost of these products is imported from beyond the Bug. Who is to blame Putin or the Antimonopoly Service??
  58. 0
    29 October 2017 20: 42
    Quote “First of all, let’s expose the myth about tens of billions of dollars, euros and tugriks kept by GDP in the West...” The whistleblower’s conclusions sincerely made me laugh. The Russian President today has such power that none of the leaders of the top five European countries, or even the President of the United States, has. Therefore, hiding money in Swiss, Austrian or German banks in fake SVR accounts is not a problem. In addition, there are very reliable Hong Kong and Singapore banks. With all my dislike for Navalny, I must say that a number of his revelations, especially about the GDP wallet, are much more convincing than the conclusion of this author. In addition, the unfortunate analyst forgets to say that neither Gaddafi nor Saddam Hussein hid their accounts in foreign banks, while nothing is known about the accounts of Vladimir Vladimirovich, but this does not mean at all that they do not exist!
    1. +7
      29 October 2017 20: 57
      Quote: Viltor
      nothing is known about Vladimir Vladimirovich’s accounts, but this does not mean that they do not exist!

      Exactly.
      Nothing is known for certain about the existence, for example, of green devils.
      But that doesn't mean they don't exist laughing
  59. +2
    29 October 2017 22: 17
    Putin is no match for Stalin. We decided with whom to compare
  60. +1
    30 October 2017 00: 37
    Putin will leave just like Nikolai Palkin...such is karma....
  61. 0
    30 October 2017 04: 39
    If VVP goes to a new term, he, like Mussolini, will see during his lifetime the collapse of his glory and the bitterness of the people against him.
    When his first 8-year “pontificate” ended, Dugin said remarkably precise words. Putin destroyed the Yeltsin system, and he is faced with the task of creating a new one in its place. Since then, he succeeded even more in the first task, but never took on the second. What kind of conversation can there be about the course of a country living according to Yeltsin’s (i.e. occupation) Constitution and joyfully waving Yeltsin’s tricolor banner? And no movements are visible in terms of destroying this vile screen; We keep everything secret and successfully conduct subtle international intrigues.
    This means that he is not capable of legalizing the new system! And this is the main task now. So we will spend the entire new term, like a car that has fallen on its side, spinning its wheels idly. Therefore, Putin must give way to someone else who is capable. am
  62. 0
    30 October 2017 08: 07
    Anyone can become a president, but not everyone can be one!
  63. +1
    30 October 2017 12: 03
    Quote: СРЦ П-15
    Putin may not go to the polls

    Come on! You can’t pick them out of there with a tank until the fins are glued together. All they do is move from chair to chair, and the results of their work are near-zero, if not negative. Even according to their Jesuit statistics, when people give cabbage and they eat meat - but on average everything is fine - cabbage rolls.
  64. 0
    30 October 2017 14: 41
    Quote: Stas157
    And who organized this farce?

    Wait, it's not evening yet...
  65. 0
    30 October 2017 16: 25
    Putin will go to the polls and be re-elected calmly. I see problems elsewhere.
    1. problem. Putin is no longer young, and the fact that Trump became president at 71 does not refute the fact that the average life expectancy in Russia for men is 65,9 years (data for 2015). The fact that Putin is an athlete and the best doctors are looking after him can be offset by the fact that the position of head of state is very nervous and we live in very turbulent times. And then I’ll give you a famous quote:
    Yes, man is mortal, but that would not be so bad. The bad thing is that he is sometimes suddenly mortal, that's the trick!
    M. Bulgakov

    I will add on my own behalf. that the older a person gets, the higher the likelihood of such surprises.
    What then? A squabble for power, aggravated by the second problem.
    Problem 2. Putin, like any strong leader, is surrounded by weak and weak-willed executors of his will. I don’t see a single strong personality next to him who can shoulder a country like Russia. A person with his own position, capable of pursuing his own policy no matter what and defending the interests of Russia, a leader whose people will follow. Not a single one who would faithfully serve his fatherland, and not a specific person or his own pocket, whom the people would trust. But a weak and weak-willed President is not an option for our country, and it doesn’t matter whether he is chosen as a successor or he comes to power suddenly.
    Our country will no longer survive the second Yeltsin or Gorbachev; the reserve of safety laid down by our ancestors has ended.
    This means, in my opinion, Putin’s main task for the next few years is to find a truly worthy replacement for himself, otherwise he can go down in history as the penultimate President of Russia, at least of the Russia we see on the map now, and not the one that barely exceeds the size of the Moscow region.
  66. +1
    30 October 2017 16: 26
    Whether it happens or not, it makes no difference, it will be just another public relations person, nothing more
  67. 0
    31 October 2017 04: 48
    Here is the correct vector suggested. I agree with the author. I remember Italy and the porn star Cicciolina. It went well - tolerance, tolerance. So we have an infection. Ksyusha was a fool, and remains a fool... And I propose a serious discussion for readers. Let's collect signatures and come up with a proposal, they say, although this has never happened in history, Russia at the moment is without worthy candidates. Apart from Putin, there are no worthy politicians or ministers. Let's nominate His Holiness Patriarch of Moscow and All Rus' Kirill (Gundyaev)! GDP has one BIG drawback - it does not know how to create a GOOD team. And period. I have the right to write like this, because I myself have proven that I can and know how. And VVP is a lone intelligence officer. We have always had such good fighters. And in difficult times they went to die for their homeland. Take Richard Sorge, for example. But they don’t know how to work in a team: no matter what happens, if you urgently need to remove a person for work. And here we see Putin’s team. In first place is Chubais, the rest are all sorts of Serdyukovs and Medvedevs. And further along the Medvedevskaya line the Medinskys, etc. That’s why in Russia we have a hard time with education, culture, elderly academics, etc. and so on. Everything has been clear for a long time. Drive. But we again assume a castling with Medvedev for the post of President. Dear, I don’t know what I’ll do, but Medvedev’s surrender of Libya is already enough... I’ve played enough at democracy. Thus, the Patriarch is better than Ksyusha, definitely. And he knows how to assemble a team. Analyze for yourself. I raise a cry: we ask you to renounce your rank for the good of Russia!
    1. +9
      31 October 2017 06: 17
      Quote: All the details
      GDP has one BIG drawback - it does not know how to create a GOOD team. And period. I have the right to write like this, because I myself have proven that I can and know how

      So, this... nominate yourself! Maybe they'll even elect wassat
      You will only live “at the top” until the moment you begin to “equalize the team.”
      This is where you... will be leveled Yes
      Do not confuse “team building” (what did you build there, by the way?) at the management level... and even at a large enterprise with the same at the country level. Trump is definitely no more stupid than you, and where is that Trump now? But I really wanted what was best...
      Quote: All the details
      Thus, the Patriarch is better than Ksyusha, definitely

      Yeah... “at least a cat, if there’s no dog”... Gundyaeva for president... I’m losing weight, dear editors request
      1. 0
        31 October 2017 06: 29
        Don't be smart Jack. Although "Jack" is already a diagnosis. Firstly, Trump also does not know how to create a team. It's already visible. Secondly, the author of the article wrote “Why Putin will not nominate...”. What do I have to do with it? Thirdly, the author is right that if Putin comes forward now, then according to the law it will be a mess. But Russia needs to survive not 2-3-4-5-6-7-8-9 years, but longer. And according to the author, Putin should just wait it out now. With whom? As they say in Odessa... Medvedev again? Yes my God!
        1. +8
          31 October 2017 07: 18
          Quote: All the details
          Although "Jack" is already a diagnosis

          “It’s all in the details” is also, in its own way, a diagnosis. And the dog's name is Jack, the one in the picture, oh Yes
          Quote: All the details
          Firstly, Trump also does not know how to create a team.

          No, you won’t understand... well, it’s not possible.
          It's not about the team, it's about the resistance that the system has to anyone, ahem, trying to somehow reform it. Le Chatelier's principle (do you know what it is?) has not yet been canceled.
          For Trump it’s the Clintons and Soros, for Putin... yes, think for yourself, it’s smart...
          Quote: All the details
          ... the author of the article wrote "Why Putin will not run..."

          These are the problems of the author, what he wrote. In essence, there is nothing to say about the article - the article is about nothing, fortune-telling, “wobbling through the water.”
          Quote: All the details
          What do I have to do with it?

          What you wrote is, IMHO, nonsense. I took the liberty to correct it slightly wink
          Quote: All the details
          ... if Putin comes forward now, then according to the law it will be a mess...

          There's already a kirdyk in terms of age... almost.
          IMHO after Putin there will be someone who is already being prepared for this. And the fact that we don’t know who it will be is quite understandable, “they didn’t come out with their snout.” And this, by the way, is correct.
          Quote: All the details
          Medvedev again? Yes my God!

          Almost certainly not Medvedev. And certainly not Ksyushad.
          But with Gundyaev you hit the bar, I was surprised, like, “Why are you laughing so hard in the morning, and you seem to be sober...” laughing
          1. +1
            1 November 2017 15: 10
            All the details
            “First of all, Trump also doesn’t know how to create a team. It’s already obvious.” - and billions (and more than once!!!) fell from the sky for him?
            You are confusing the team of the organization - where you can fire everyone to zero and recruit new ones (yes, there will be problems - but this is not global, a question of money / profit) and the apparatus of governing the country - where it is physically impossible to do this (otherwise “war communism of 1918”). It was , passed...

            In Kazan, during the winter (more precisely 7 months) of 1919-20, 2 public baths were heated... by state securities RI (bills, shares, coupons, etc.) - they were drowned with paper alone!!!. According to some estimates, they burned at least 5 billion rubles in gold per month... - “Why, there is no tsar, pieces of paper are worth nothing! !!". One of the foreigners saw this case (I don’t remember the details - I read it a long time ago) - he returned to Paris, told a banker he knew, he said that since the money of the RSFSR was not recognized - but the tsarist money was in force, he would accept such papers for to the bank for about 80% of the nominal value!!!! And they used them to heat the baths....
            1. +8
              1 November 2017 15: 12
              Quote: your1970
              your1970

              I read it carefully and agree with everything.
              But you answered... to the wrong person, your opponent is a little higher in the thread request
              1. 0
                1 November 2017 15: 49
                the opponent shouted about his inability to create a team....
                alas, a little belay not correct feel quoted
  68. 0
    31 October 2017 09: 27
    If he doesn’t go, then he’s a traitor. And then the opening of the wailing wall, he sighed and groaned there, and why wouldn’t he build us a wall for those killed by Peter I, he ruined so many souls. All this is disgusting, disgusting. If he doesn’t go, he’ll be devoured, even the wailing wall won’t help, Crimea will be returned, the country will fall apart.
  69. 0
    31 October 2017 12: 48
    Everything is somehow very rosy and radiant. Especially when you consider who carefully built and trained this opposition. A bunch of cowardly, well-fed parrots. Under the wide, warm hand of the owner...
  70. 0
    31 October 2017 15: 09
    The author seems to have started muttering about Donbass, blaming his whining on us. This is of course his personal opinion, but let’s not speak for us!, talk to yourself!. I hope our dear President is not of your breed, he will not betray the country, and we will not give him up! :).
  71. +5
    31 October 2017 16: 48
    Actually, the GDP has a cunning plan, either that, or a choice from a herd of idiots. Is there an alternative to GDP? That's it.
  72. 0
    31 October 2017 18: 22
    No need to joke! They don’t change horses midway! On the contrary, come together to the elections, choose the GDP, and after that carry out a purge of the elite, expel all sorts of “effective managers”, “shift workers” and other pro-Westerners from the country (after returning to the state treasury “earned by back-breaking labor”). Only then will it be possible to build in Russian capitalism (socialism!) - what a difference, but with a human face!
  73. 0
    31 October 2017 21: 55
    The task for the next term is to prepare and bring to power a worthy successor... Stalin failed to do this.
  74. 0
    1 November 2017 00: 39
    /Today, the current president of Russia has every chance of entering the modern history of Russia with no less baggage than Stalin./
    To do this, he just had to organize the terror for which his “great” predecessor is remembered.
    1. 0
      1 November 2017 21: 53
      hello, Shenderovich, eat matzah, jump, let him go, your case is lost anyway)
  75. 0
    1 November 2017 14: 55
    Quote: stas
    Poor Russia, if it has only one tsar, on whom everything depends.
    But this was created by the Tsar himself, cleansed all politicians - no one but him.
    Even DAMU chose less than himself tall and without a king in his head.
    - what for us whose politician can CLEAR??At a minimum, it must be resistant to any cleaning!!!! Otherwise, tomorrow serious guys like the USA will start cleaning it and it will leak...
    A politician who can be pressed in easily and naturally is Emil Gaha:
    "in the evening 14 March 1939 year Hitler called President Hacha to the Reich Chancellery in Berlin. Hitler deliberately kept him waiting for several hours while I watched the movie myself. Finally, in 1:30 am On March 15, 1939, Hitler met with Emil Hacha and told him that, as planned, the German army would invade Czechoslovakia."
    We need such??
    The one who was told to do this and that, he does it, otherwise he will be cleaned out.
    This is why people remember Stalin - he could not simply be subjugated to his will, he was on his own...
    It was not for nothing that Churchill described how everyone stood up when he entered (and he didn’t want to get up before that!!) - he walked in senior and everyone stood up on reflexes. This is what we need, you can’t just clear it out. Look, we’ll survive among our current “friends-partners”...
  76. 0
    2 November 2017 11: 39
    There is nothing reprehensible if VVP goes to the polls again and takes the post of President. The whole point is that people are waiting for a new team of the president, new people who, each in their place, are capable of leading people, generating and implementing ideas for the development of the country, from high-speed railways and information networks to Space. And then the president who will lead such a team will look great for the next 6 years. And here we simply cannot do without GDP at this stage. Now, ask anyone, what thoughts are conveyed by the tandem “replacement” flashing on TV screens or his first deputies, etc.? That's the whole point.
  77. 0
    12 January 2018 21: 49
    well, so how?
    billions in the cello offshore have not been confirmed?

    and for the hundred and fifth time you didn’t become president?

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"