Ministry of Defense of Belarus: Upgraded Polonaise hit targets at 300 km range

84
October 26 on the territory of the Gomel region as part of firing tests successfully conducted combat launches of the upgraded version of the MLRS "Polonaise", сообщает Ministry of Defense of the Republic of Belarus.

Excellent results of combat shooting confirmed the unique possibilities of this. weapons with a new long-range missile. The flight route of the rocket was calculated over deserted and sparsely populated areas of the country and was adjusted throughout its length.
- said in a statement



Ministry of Defense of Belarus: Upgraded Polonaise hit targets at 300 km range


Missiles with great capabilities hit the assigned targets and confirmed the stated tactical and technical characteristics in terms of range and accuracy. After the upgrade, the missile system allows you to hit designated targets within a radius of up to 300 kilometers
- added to the MO of Belarus.

The long-range multiple-launch rocket launcher system "Polonaise" was created by Belarusian organizations of the defense sector of the economy and corresponds to the best world analogues. Missiles of one Polonaise MLRS combat vehicle are capable of delivering accurate strikes against eight targets simultaneously, and the deviation from the given coordinates at a maximum distance does not exceed 30 meters. Such accuracy, together with other advantages, allows this missile system to solve many combat missions that are characteristic of operational-tactical missile systems and bomber aviation.

According to the Ministry of Defense of the Republic of Belarus, in the future it is planned to bring the upgraded system of “Polonez” salvo fire into service of the missile forces and artillery of the Armed Forces of the Republic of Belarus, which will significantly increase their ability to solve a wide range of fire tasks.
  • Ministry of Defense of the Republic of Belarus
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

84 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +4
    26 October 2017 13: 58
    The bad news is that Red and White can use this weapon against the Russian Federation.
    1. +26
      26 October 2017 14: 00
      The bad news is that Red and White can use this weapon against the Russian Federation.


      And you, by chance, in the "Red and White" do not go too often? winked
      1. The comment was deleted.
    2. +2
      26 October 2017 14: 15
      So this is a joint development with Belarusians, on the contrary, they can send to the other side according to the accumulation of NATO members, they are still places in the CSTO wassat
      1. +12
        26 October 2017 14: 55
        Belarus already supplies fuel and lubricants to Bandera Ukraine, does not recognize Crimea as part of the Russian Federation, has banned the St. George ribbon on its territory, has banned the screening of the film Crimea, and those who go to Belarus under red and white flags are outright Nazis, such as The Right Sector ... I do not consider them allies of Russia ... they will betray at any moment .... yes they already betray ...
        1. +16
          26 October 2017 16: 08
          Quote: Nemesis
          banned the St. George ribbon on its territory,

          they told you in the mattress regional committee? I for example hear it for the first time
          1. +5
            26 October 2017 16: 14
            So you’re listening through your Minsk relatives’s filter, so don’t hear ... Lukashenko has long issued a decree to ban St. George’s ribbon and use only ribbons in the colors of the national flag of Belarus with the apple tree flower. Do you have Internet, google the topic before writing me all sorts of nonsense, and even in a defiant form ...
            1. +15
              26 October 2017 16: 29
              Why do I need to google if I have an antenna attached to the May car, and I don’t have one recourse
              1. +2
                26 October 2017 16: 30
                And why should I listen to your fairy tales, if I see a completely different thing on the video in the Vesti program ...
                1. +7
                  26 October 2017 16: 36
                  “Recently, a Brest woman Irina Lavrovskaya was riding in a city minibus and saw a St. George’s ribbon on the windshield of the driver. The woman asked her to be removed, but was refused in a rude manner, ”writes Belsat. - After that, she wrote a complaint to the director of the Brestgortrans public transport company. Belsat writes that “Article 194 of the SDA of Belarus prohibits participation in the traffic of a vehicle with stickers and objects that interfere with the view. These include ribbons and any flags. Such a driver may be held administratively liable. ”
                  I had it on my antenna and no problem
                  1. +2
                    26 October 2017 16: 38
                    The Vesti program deals with a specific decree of Lukashenko and I trust the federal channels of the Russian Federation more ...
                    1. +5
                      26 October 2017 18: 10
                      Quote: Nemesis
                      The Vesti program deals with a specific decree of Lukashenko and I trust the federal channels of the Russian Federation more ...


                      More movies only news;)
                      1. +3
                        26 October 2017 18: 40
                        Sorry, but when the news is supported by a documentary video, they don’t lie, and the lies of the former republics of the scoop and people from them are really tired
                    2. +8
                      26 October 2017 20: 10
                      Quote: Nemesis
                      The Vesti program deals with a specific decree of Lukashenko and I trust the federal channels of the Russian Federation more ...

                      i mean special? I didn’t notice it, but look at the zombie man, young man, but how did you pass it to EGE, do not share it?
                      1. +1
                        26 October 2017 23: 31
                        A video was shown in Vesti, EG didn’t give up, not at that age for a long time, and I believe my eyes more than any soviet separatists separated from Russia
                    3. +3
                      27 October 2017 06: 31

                      You can’t believe the TV indiscriminately, especially if it's easy to check.
                      1. +1
                        27 October 2017 06: 38
                        But soviet sepores cannot be trusted at all
                2. +6
                  26 October 2017 21: 24
                  Bullshit is complete, traffic cops and those with St. George’s ribbon ride, watch less Kiseleva on Sundays — a better dream!
                  1. +4
                    26 October 2017 23: 32
                    That's something in Vesti on the video I didn’t see this, but I saw something different and I saw your Lukashenko and not with the St. George ribbon and around him nobody ... And your tales are not interesting to me
            2. 0
              28 October 2017 15: 43
              St. George's tape is prohibited for use by officials, civil servants and state employees. Private individuals continue to use St. George's ribbons on the respective holidays.
              1. +2
                28 October 2017 15: 53
                Who cares? I'm not talking about your red-and-white, who are frank Bandera and Russophobes ... The vector of your authorities is not pro-Russian at all, but they love to get free money and military equipment from Russia in Minsk ... Every time they remember shouting about their independence .. . Independent countries should live on their money, and not on handouts from the Russian Federation. As a citizen of the Russian Federation, I am not very pleased to see that Russian money is spent on foreign countries
          2. +3
            26 October 2017 19: 27
            Quote: Partyzan
            Quote: Nemesis
            banned the St. George ribbon on its territory,

            they told you in the mattress regional committee? I for example hear it for the first time

            They were told the face to the Old Man, they are working out, so there is no particular need to pay attention .. soldier
            1. +1
              27 October 2017 06: 38
              For whom dad, and for whom one of the many soviet separs ...
        2. +11
          26 October 2017 16: 15
          Well, who is driving such a heresy into your head. It’s hard to find St. George’s ribbon in a typical day, yes. BUT on May 9, they distribute without problems, go, carry. Soon it’s Victory Day, and many cars still hang from the last holiday. Well, majorists love their cars for the holiday to embellish the St. George ribbon + on Berlin on the entire facade.
          Follow the language, dear
          1. +2
            26 October 2017 16: 17
            I trust the Russian Vesti program more than the tales of any independent and separated from Russia ... Moreover, the video is confirmed by these facts
            1. +6
              26 October 2017 17: 26
              Quote: Nemesis
              I trust the Russian program more
              Exactly the Russian program ????? belay the first time I hear this .... I'm in shock ..... laughing
              1. +2
                26 October 2017 17: 31
                Look at the YouTube News of the Russian Federation program on YouTube ...
                1. +9
                  26 October 2017 18: 13
                  News, but you need to listen and understand with your head. We have enough of our own.
                  Partisan, and the news is your Belsatovskaya, (made in Poland).
                  1. +3
                    26 October 2017 18: 42
                    Oh, don’t ... Lukashenko doesn’t even want to show the film Crimea in Belarus, which speaks very well of his attitude to Bandera and his relations with Kiev ... And after Belarus began to supply the Bandera anti-terrorist operation with fuel and lubricants of the Russian Federation, all trade should be transferred from Belarus at global prices
                  2. +5
                    26 October 2017 20: 23
                    Quote: japs
                    Partisan, and the news is your Belsatovskaya, (made in Poland).

                    I do not argue - there is no data anywhere, so I brought two versions, but I think our manufacturer - according to their patterns, and so - time will tell hi
          2. +1
            28 October 2017 15: 46
            Circulars banning St. George's ribbons were sent to public organizations. Not so long ago, a minibus driver was fined, on which some zmagar complained that in his cabin the St. George ribbon was tied.
        3. +2
          26 October 2017 17: 35
          Well, Russia sells coal to Ukraine ... hi
          1. +2
            26 October 2017 18: 44
            Tanks on coal do not drive
            1. +3
              26 October 2017 20: 41
              So Russia supplies fuel
              In January-March 2017, Ukraine also imported $ 869,8 million worth of oil products, which is 62,9% more than in the same period last year. According to the agency, the import of petroleum products from Belarus in monetary terms amounted to $ 458,5 million (52,7% of the cost of importing petroleum products), from Russia - $ 209,4 million (24%)
              1. +2
                26 October 2017 23: 35
                Here are just sales of tank diesel in Minsk to Ukraine ahead of the rest
                1. sq
                  +1
                  27 October 2017 08: 11
                  But what kind of special diesel fuel is needed for tanks?
                  1. +1
                    27 October 2017 17: 59
                    No, the most common
        4. +3
          26 October 2017 18: 29
          By the way, as I understand it, Russian companies operating in Ukraine apparently only run combines and Zhiguli cars? And in offices strictly probably only in kokoshniks and kosovorotki go that would be in full compliance ...? Well, again, it’s flattering to read about our greatness in Belarus, on which the recognition of the Russian Crimea actually depends ..
          1. +2
            26 October 2017 18: 45
            Nothing depends on you, but your attitude itself says a lot ... It's me about your power
            1. +5
              26 October 2017 18: 58
              And what do you dislike about our power? Look at your own one. Sobchak is jumping around the country, and you’ve rightly divorced him into sabers ...
              1. 0
                26 October 2017 22: 56
                good
                Quote: XXXIII
                Quote: Old26
                This is really a joint development of Belarusians. But with the Chinese

                The chain could be longer for this story, RB ordered their idea of ​​developing a missile project in the Russian Federation, and assembled in China, as a result they received a high-quality and not expensive MLRS, for the arms market it was just a gold mine ..... just a version .... fellow

                And where does the Russian Federation if China has its own developments?
              2. +4
                26 October 2017 23: 37
                Sobchak is no one in the Russian Federation, and your red-and-white ones are cooler than the Communist Party and the Liberal Democratic Party in the Russian Federation combined ... But your government is Yanukovych ... you want to serve everyone, but he loves to live on the money of the Russian Federation, shouting about his independence ... Independent states should not live at the expense of the Russian Federation if they are so independent
        5. +2
          26 October 2017 18: 50
          Quote: Nemesis
          Belarus already supplies fuel and lubricants to Bandera Ukraine, does not recognize Crimea as part of the Russian Federation, has banned the St. George ribbon on its territory, has banned the screening of the film Crimea, and those who go to Belarus under red and white flags are outright Nazis, such as The Right Sector ... I do not consider them allies of Russia ... they will betray at any moment .... yes they already betray ...

          I read these manuals .. Everything is corny and standard Nemesis!
          The whole problem of the Old Man is that he does not let thieves and scammers into the country, who are torn to Belarus by a rampart from Russia, including (a tidbit very)
          Belarus is truly independent! But Russia, in which case, will not betray (judging by recent recent joint exercises ..) This is the main point!
          1. +4
            26 October 2017 18: 52
            The problem with your dad is that he repeats the policy of Yanukovych - one ass in two chairs ... He wants to live with the money of the Russian Federation and at the same time in his independent kingdom ... I’m here how to feed and arm a citizen of the Russian Federation at the expense and detriment of Russia I don’t want the country at all
            1. sq
              +1
              27 October 2017 08: 13
              Yes, Nemesis is a real Orel, well, the one that the tree pecks.
              1. +1
                27 October 2017 18: 01
                Well, it’s clear that in any republic, the scoop believes that Russia owes them, but we don’t think so ...
    3. +2
      26 October 2017 14: 28
      Well done Belarusians! 300 km is just enough to Warsaw. Will they be "hello to Aginsky," if that.lol
      1. +3
        26 October 2017 17: 28
        Quote: siberalt
        Well done Belarusians!
        Yes, in general, hard workers, bending steel cold ..... drinks
    4. +3
      26 October 2017 17: 47
      Everything is fine, now fraternal Belarus can easily naughty, from any part of the country, in the NATO Baltic and Poland, there is nothing to say about Ukraine.
      1. +1
        26 October 2017 19: 30
        Quote: Stolz
        Everything is fine, now fraternal Belarus can easily naughty, from any part of the country, in the NATO Baltic and Poland, there is nothing to say about Ukraine.

        Yes, there’s something more serious, I’m sure .. It’s not for nothing that such a howl rose in the West after joint exercises ..
    5. 0
      26 October 2017 22: 09
      1
      Nemesis Today, 13:58
      The bad news is that Red and White can use this weapon against the Russian Federation.
      They are just going to deliver to Azerbaijan, but the red-and-white ones are not in power; Lukashenka is cunning but not crazy to sow panic.
    6. +1
      28 October 2017 15: 38
      They can’t. A Chinese rocket. RB does not produce its missiles.
  2. +7
    26 October 2017 13: 59
    On October 26, in the Gomel region, as part of the shooting tests, combat launches of the upgraded version of the Polonaise MLRS were successfully carried out, the Ministry of Defense of the Republic of Belarus reports.
    something rumbles nearby good
    1. +1
      26 October 2017 14: 19
      Where are the rockets themselves designed and manufactured? And how does aiming at the target occur at such distances?
      1. +5
        26 October 2017 14: 44
        Chinese missiles (A 200). Inertial guidance and GPS.
        1. +7
          26 October 2017 14: 54
          Quote: Bronevick
          Chinese Acts (A 200). Inertial guidance and GPS.

          who thinks
          What almost all the experts were united in was that the prototype of this powerful ammunition is the rocket of the Chinese M20 complex. True, some believe that the Belarusians simply borrowed it from their Chinese partners. Others believe that on the basis of the original design created their own product.
          and another opinion
          in Belarus, work is underway to localize the production of A200 rockets at the Minsk RPUP “Precision Electromechanics Plant”.
          Already a year and a half ago, the share of Belarusian components in Polonaise was approaching 70%, and this figure was supposed to be brought to nearly 95%.
          1. The comment was deleted.
            1. +10
              26 October 2017 16: 10
              Quote: Toliant34
              Man, your crooked hands, you can’t kill a tractor ... ... there are those. Missiles .... ketay

              it's from which place they grow, do not judge everyone by yourself hi
            2. +3
              26 October 2017 17: 36
              Quote: Toliant34
              Man, your crooked hands, you can’t kill a tractor ... ... there are those. Missiles .... ketay
              The assumption of joint development of the Polonaise system has not yet been confirmed by official sources. The Belarusian side claims that the draft new MLRS was developed only by domestic enterprises, without the involvement of foreign specialists.
        2. +4
          27 October 2017 17: 06
          Dear BRONEVICK, if this makes it easier for you, then consider the missiles Chinese or Indian, this does not affect their real origin ... I understand the urapptriotic-mad average Russian citizen who was convinced by the media of the superiority of Russian weapons and Russian weapons design thoughts ... it's generally even helpful. Cannon meat must believe in its weapons ... But the reality is somewhat different from the picture in the media. If you do not turn on the brain for a long time, then you can understand that the creative heritage inherited by Russia from the Soviet Union is now lost through the efforts of "effective managers" .. This is evidenced by the twenty-year-old gimp with the Bulava rocket, which is still unknown or not flying, 10 the summer saga with a 5th generation airplane which even has no engine to run up to, the Armata tank was not able to be mass-produced due to the lack of an element base ... well, and that’s far ... Therefore, even the microscopic success of the Belarusians who created rude talk I primitive by today's weapons vyzyvat such a zealous response from the average Russian. Here you can advise only one INCLUDE THE FREQUENTLY ANALYTICAL DEPARTMENT OF YOUR BRAIN.
          1. +1
            27 October 2017 18: 32
            Why did you write all this to me? The man asked whose rockets I answered. It is you turn on your brain. Belarusians didn’t make a single weapon themselves, so your urapatriotism is not appropriate, and we’ll deal with our weapons ourselves. Good?
  3. +4
    26 October 2017 15: 56
    but how did they "correct" the trajectory? ... maybe they monitored? .. or did they manage to make the control system manageable?
    1. +5
      26 October 2017 16: 11
      Quote: assa67
      but how did they "correct" the trajectory? ... maybe they monitored? .. or did they manage to make the control system manageable?

      yes, can change the flight path
  4. 0
    26 October 2017 16: 13
    And we have? We need it too! Such MLRS. 300 km onwards. soldier
  5. +3
    26 October 2017 16: 23
    Quote: hrych
    So this is a joint development with Belarusians, on the contrary, they can send to the other side according to the accumulation of NATO members, they are still places in the CSTO wassat

    This is really a joint development of Belarusians. But with the Chinese
    1. +2
      26 October 2017 17: 45
      Quote: Old26
      This is really a joint development of Belarusians. But with the Chinese

      The chain could be longer for this story, RB ordered their idea of ​​developing a missile project in the Russian Federation, and assembled in China, as a result they received a high-quality and not expensive MLRS, for the arms market it was just a gold mine ..... just a version .... fellow
  6. 0
    26 October 2017 16: 38
    It’s interesting what long-range warhead missiles are, and whether it’s sufficient for a 30-meter span, it turns out that neither a tank nor a shielded bunker can be hit by a single missile, while the sense of homing each missile separately is tyrannical because efficiency will be low, I think we’ll successfully fill this niche with an expander, and accuracy higher than bch more
    1. +3
      26 October 2017 22: 05
      For example, in a chemical plant, an oil refinery, in a power plant, you can also fly into the headquarters too. Who is going to shoot at the tank with such missiles at military airports on airplanes is also good
  7. 0
    26 October 2017 17: 49
    Sad The Chinese were ahead of us with missiles for the MLRS.
    1. +1
      26 October 2017 19: 32
      Quote: gromoboj
      Sad The Chinese were ahead of us with missiles for the MLRS.

      Do not be sad, comrade, this is all outwardly only.
  8. +6
    26 October 2017 19: 28
    But Belarus can develop and put into service rocket weapons with any range of destruction, because it is not officially included in the INF Treaty ... It remains to announce to the world the test of a multiple launch rocket system with a range of 1-3 thousand kilometers ...
    1. +2
      26 October 2017 21: 38
      Quote: zulusuluz
      It remains to announce to the world about testing a multiple launch rocket system with a range of 1-3 thousand kilometers ...
      It is necessary for the Russian Federation to think about the second red button for an ally ..... Yes
    2. +1
      26 October 2017 22: 06
      Included in a place with Russia and Kazakhstan
      1. 0
        27 October 2017 10: 00
        The INF Treaty was concluded between the USSR and the USA. Belarus is not officially the successor of the USSR, i.e. and does not participate in this contract.
  9. 0
    26 October 2017 23: 02
    Quote: zulusuluz
    But Belarus can develop and put into service rocket weapons with any range of destruction, because it is not officially included in the INF Treaty ... It remains to announce to the world the test of a multiple launch rocket system with a range of 1-3 thousand kilometers ...

    As far as you know is included.
    1. 0
      27 October 2017 09: 58
      The INF Treaty was concluded between 2 countries - the USSR and the USA. Belarus, as far as I know, is not a successor to the USSR. Otherwise, why do not we pay the USSR debts on an equal footing with Russia?
  10. 0
    26 October 2017 23: 21
    Quote: WAGNER-M
    Quote: gromoboj
    Sad The Chinese were ahead of us with missiles for the MLRS.

    Do not be sad, comrade, this is all outwardly only.

    Do we have something similar?
  11. +4
    27 October 2017 01: 14
    Nemesis
    A video was shown in Vesti, EG didn’t give up, not at that age for a long time, and I believe my eyes more than any soviet separatists separated from Russia

    You don’t know the history of Russia. At the time of the collapse of the USSR, Belarus was not part of Russia and accordingly could not separate from it. Russia proclaimed sovereignty earlier (June 12, 1990) of Belarus (July 27, 1990). So who is the separatist?
    Learn, study and study again, as one intelligent man bequeathed.
    1. +1
      27 October 2017 18: 03
      Well, let's not let the dust go ... Sovereignty is not a piece of paper, it is considered from the day the flag was raised and state institutions seized by local nationalists .... For example, Ukraine raised its yellow-black block much earlier than signed papers
  12. +5
    27 October 2017 11: 39
    Nemesis Yesterday, 16:30 ↑
    And why should I listen to your fairy tales if I see something completely different on the video in the Vesti program.

    The VESTI program also showed how Belarusian Nazis shouted against Lukashenko, but at the same time, they cut scenes where the same Nazis urinate on the Russian flag and trample it underfoot, your VESTI is silent about this, because the KREMLYA ideology is to wet Lukashenko. And also VESTI, do not show that in Russia policemen are more frostbite than those that were in the 40s of the last century, that in Russia they brothel at every corner, that authoritative roosters and watching roosters rule everywhere. And without a bribe, you can only sneeze. And having brought the largest and richest country to such a state, you still dare yelp in someone's direction. Do you even wash yourself miserable !?
  13. 0
    27 October 2017 12: 36
    Of course, I don’t know if the missile is not military, but the damage from it in this video is like a piece of shit from an airplane.
    1. 0
      27 October 2017 13: 44
      The video clearly shows that the missile without a warhead. A kinetic blow lifted a column of peat into the air.
      1. +1
        28 October 2017 10: 53
        Specially looked at the storyboard the lack of (visually) warhead did not notice. "Clearly visible" is this this frame ???
        1. 0
          28 October 2017 11: 51
          If there was a warhead, the flag would not stand after hitting the ground. A shock wave would blow him, and he didn’t even move. It follows that there is no warhead. The usual kinetic hit of the rocket’s head against the ground. The absence of warheads is a common test practice.
          1. 0
            28 October 2017 15: 31
            And if my grandmother would have been ..... she was a grandfather, I understand that too. The point is not that — your words (in the video you can clearly see that the rocket is without warheads) I threw off the photo on you and you can’t see anything. the fact that there was no explosion, I myself saw and in my commentary on the video it was suggested that the missile is possible without warheads, so you didn’t exclude the possibility of correcting me, you didn’t understand why if you yourself didn’t see anything but guessed like me. So that's what I that’s all, you don’t need to be clever without need.
  14. +1
    27 October 2017 16: 18
    For this “Polonaise”, yes, it would be about five kilotons of heels ... he wouldn’t have a price at all ... And who said that it was not for this purpose?

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"