Military Review

Putin is being prepared "devaluation" of the presidential election?

54
Putin is being prepared "devaluation" of the presidential election?



The nomination of TV presenter Ksenia Sobchak for the presidency, as she announced on October 18, was initially perceived by many with irony. However, over time, it became clear that the unexpected move was made consciously and with all seriousness, and made primarily by the Kremlin. Obviously, the curator of the election, Sergei Kiriyenko, decided to attract additional electorate to the polling stations so that the victory of the main candidate would be supported by a good turnout. However, the plan has a number of flaws, and it may turn out to be a failure at all if another woman comes forward together with Sobchak - the wife of Alexei Navalny. Details - in the material on the eve.RU.

Sobchak does not hide that he didn’t think much about the political program, it’s not her job as a candidate to talk about the aspirations and desires of the people, it’s enough just to announce the nomination and speak for all the good and all the bad things with female immediacy. On the NTV channel, which was recently so hated by the entire opposition, a big and generally complimentary film about candidate Ksyusha Sobchak was released. while working in the St. Petersburg City Hall Anatolia Sobchak.

And today, Sobchak said that her main task is to break the existing election system, which she called the "high-budget show."

“I understand perfectly well that what is happening now is not an election, it’s like an election,” Sobchak said. “What we see now is rather a kind of high-budget show, and I, as a professional, can say quite low quality. " According to the “candidate candidate”, her task is “to turn this show over and establish its own rules of the game.”

In addition, Sobchak introduced the chief of her election headquarters to reporters. They became a journalist and political scientist Igor Malashenko, who was one of the leaders of NTV, when the owner of the channel was the oligarch Vladimir Gusinsky. Malashenko is the husband of another secular diva - Bozhena Rynski. Needless to say, that one, considering her attitude to the nomination of Sobchak, was pretty surprised by this.



Malashenko, in turn, explained that "there will be many voices in the campaign, we may disagree with each other." And he gave an example of disagreement: Malashenko does not believe that Sobchak should withdraw his candidacy if opposition politician Alexei Navalny is registered.

Journalist, political consultant Anatoly Wasserman, in an interview with Nakanune.RU, stressed that the current voyage to power for Ksenia Sobchak did not become her own decision. The expert connects the promotion of "teledives" with the low turnout predicted by Kremlin analysts in the next year’s presidential elections. Therefore, it was necessary to find "behind the scenes" a certain character who would have warmed up the agenda by virtue of his own image.

“It was decided that such a woman should be a woman, they even discussed the Federation Council speaker Valentina Matvienko, but she refused,” said Wasserman. “In the end, they agreed on Ksenia Sobchak’s candidacy — Putin knows her, she’s an oppositionist, she’s young. So may attract attention. "

Political analyst, representative of the Civil Society Development Fund (FORGO), Anatoly Gagarin, recommends to treat the nomination of a blonde to power calmly, writing off this action to check public opinion.

“In medical terms, Sobchak as a“ homeopathic remedy ”is good, she can voice any topics she sees,” Gagarin said. “Moreover, she has a certain relationship to oppositionist Alexei Navalny and other protest characters. And the same Navalny will have to admit the significance of Ksenia Anatolyevna, thereby partly losing the protest theme, the protest electorate. "

According to him, Sobchak is perfectly aware of his role as a stimulus to public opinion. Moreover, as an “irritant,” it takes votes from political heavyweights — Communist Party leaders Gennady Zyuganov and the Liberal Democratic Party of Vladimir Zhirinovsky.

“At the same time, Sobchak on this topic also earns very good money,” said Gagarin. And he said that such an interesting “buzzing” in the political pre-election cauldron we will be able to observe until the new year. And then real candidates will be designated, including from the opposition.

Political analyst Maxim Zharov believes that for now the current president of the Russian Federation, Vladimir Putin, will not let him know whether he will go to the polls or not, it’s premature to draw conclusions about the architecture of the presidential campaign, including from the point of view of the appearance of Mrs. Sobchak.

“In fact, Ksenia Sobchak has the same task as Alexei Navalny,” Zarov said on the eve, “to unite around him those who vote with their feet, that is, the passive electorate. As is known, graphs” against all "in the electoral law is not, and Sobchak is going to occupy this niche, as she immediately stated."

As for the questions, why and why Ksenia appeared on the political arena right now, the political scientist noted quite close contacts between the “socialite” and Vladimir Putin, when he still served as chairman of the foreign relations committee at the first mayor of St. Petersburg, Anatolia Sobchak.

“These ties allow Ksenia Sobchak to conduct a public and non-public dialogue with the president about what people will be in power when the current president goes to the polls,” Zharov said. “Sobchak has this function, don't forget about this and discard this fact from the accounts ".

Interestingly, after the marked "devaluation" of the governor's status in Russia, opinions are already emerging about the upcoming "devaluation" of the presidential elections under the new curator of domestic politics in AP Sergei Kiriyenko. An attempt to attract an additional electorate, potentially an audience of “House-2”, is understandable, at the same time, it also promises dangers. Turning elections into a show, or even a circus, can adversely affect the legitimacy of the Kremlin’s main candidate’s campaign.

So, the nomination of Sobchak is already compared with the "introduction of the horse to the Senate." And in general, jokes about the “horse move” and “the horse go, the age of will cannot be seen” become commonplace. But in every joke there is some truth.

“The chances that after the departure of clowns the chosen institute of power can remain a circus, incommensurably more. Let's not forget that even the fall of Rome began with the introduction of the horse to the Senate,” notes the author of Agitation and Propaganda, journalist Konstantin Semin.



However, according to political analyst Maxim Zharov, with regard to the “devaluation” of the 2018 presidential election with the entry of Sobchak, a TV star on the electoral agenda, the topic should be postponed until the end of the year, until Putin himself says whether he will go to the presidential election or not.

“I’m interested to follow Sobchak’s rhetoric, now she’s not speaking at all about the current president,” the political analyst said. “I think she’s not going to speak against Putin, but under certain circumstances her evaluative judgments may appear. Her potential electorate is average class and, relatively speaking, “House-2.” There is nothing funny in that, for a good political consultant it is interesting enough to hold a “link” between these audiences in order to get a good result. "

Director General of the Agency for Political and Economic Communications (APEC) Dmitry Orlov believes that the presence in the election agenda of Ms. Sobchak will not reduce the status of the presidential election.

“Yes, she has a somewhat scandalous reputation, but for [the LDPR leader] Zhirinovsky she’s also scandalous, and many other [potential] presidential campaigners faced reputational problems. As for the consequences of [Sobchak ]’s participation in the presidential election, there will be greater mobility on the liberal flank, depriving Navalny of a monopoly on holding events with the involvement of a protest electorate, which he believed he has. There will be some revival in the election campaign. tviy, both positive and negative. Of course, some "carnivalization" can be traced, giving the campaign a raid on the show - it is. But in modern politics it is not dangerous. Elements of show business, playing elections have been around for several decades, with the advent of Zhirinovsky " - he says.

According to him, the revival will clearly be: a woman, relatively young, focused on protest groups, on the youth subculture, on the part of women who are not satisfied with the gender imbalance. From it you can expect a stylistically aggressive campaign. “I don’t see anything terrible in this case, on the contrary, for some part of the population it will contribute to the perception of the political process as legitimate,” the head of the APEC believes.

It is characteristic that after the bright nomination of Ksenia Sobchak, some observers recalled another potential female policy that still remained in the shadows. The wife of the opposition leader Navalny, Julia Navalnaya, may well come forward after Sobchak.

“Sobchak gave Navalny the opportunity to nominate Yulia Navalnoy as a presidential candidate,” said Konstantin Remchukov, editor-in-chief of the Nezavisimaya Gazeta, on Ekho Moskvy. According to him, this decision has its own logic, and above all, it is that in this way, Alexei Navalny, as a representative of the presidential candidate, will have access to federal television channels.

“If I were his political technologist, I would advise you to take this step, because it’s a win-win situation anyway. If the authorities want, assuming that Xenia is an agent of the authorities, if they want to turn the presidential election into a farce, then please , let Navalny be present in this farce, and the extra promotion during the election campaign will not hurt, because Navalny’s awareness in the regions has increased dramatically (more than 50%), but did not reach the level of 90% there, which is very important for such a country like ours, huh? " - says Remchukov.

Julia Navalnaya is the same age as her husband and she already has 35 years, which meets the formal requirements for nomination. Also, according to some sources, she is a member of the Yabloko party. However, Navalny himself still declares that his wife is not going to nominate her candidacy.

However, if this happens, he will put Vladimir Putin in an extremely inconvenient position - participation in the elections against two ladies and victory over them at perhaps a low turnout will be perceived as a serious decrease in the status of the politician in the last term.

Sociologist Boris Kagarlitsky is sure that Navalny is not cunning when he talks about his wife. According to him, the nomination of Ksenia Sobchak finally turned the situation with the presidential elections, as is beneficial to the liberal opposition and Alexei Navalny.

“If Navalny nominates his wife, he recognizes the legitimacy of these elections. But if he declares a boycott, which he has already reported, by the way, we see a hopeless and stalemate situation for the authorities. No one will vote in any scenario. Xenia Sobchak’s nomination will bring down the turnout is final, and the fact that it is almost openly supported by the government will alienate the elections and the loyal voter. A low turnout will be presented as the people’s refusal to recognize these elections. Navalny has reason to demand a revision of the elections. oh, give him this revision or not, especially since it will be a factual basis for a civil war, but at the political level - all clear "for him - says Kagarlitskiy.

According to journalist Maxim Shevchenko, the situation with the nomination of Ksenia Sobchak may well get out of control, and it is urgent to consolidate the left-patriotic flank in order to resist.

“The response to the liberal-fascist consolidation of Sobchak, which we see at its headquarters, where Tymoshenko’s advisors, represented by her political consultant Sitnikov, where Malashenko is and others, should be the consolidation of the left-conservative movement represented by the Left Front, the CPRF and all the people -Patriotic organizations. And Navalny’s wife or some Navalny’s mistresses, you know, I’m not interested in. Otherwise we will have, like in Ukraine, when the Communist Party was, like, in the Verkhovna Rada, and when the fascist insurgency began, the Communist Party was simply annihilated If we do not want p but either later, now or in the 2024 year, “this is all” came to power, which gathered in Ksenia Sobchak’s headquarters, you need to create a broad popular patriotic front, which is in the position of restoring the situation of the 1993 year and the Supreme Council, .RU journalist Maxim Shevchenko.
Author:
Originator:
https://www.nakanune.ru/articles/113394/
54 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. afrikanez
    afrikanez 27 October 2017 15: 11 New
    +3
    I wonder how much more you can write about this "miracle of nature"? A lot of honor to this "fabulous" character! am
    1. iouris
      iouris 27 October 2017 15: 35 New
      +4
      Elections do not need to be devalued. I think the point is not in this "character", but in the fact that both the authorities and the oligarchs are pressed from Washington. At a minimum, a response is required. As for the "headquarters", the guys were lucky: they will earn well.
      1. stas
        stas 27 October 2017 16: 36 New
        34
        Putin himself creates a devaluation.
        For 17 years, he never developed the state idea of ​​Russia.
        He wants to be both a liberal and a defender of the oligarchs and a patriot of the people who are impoverished due to his economic policy.
        You cannot sit on 3 chairs. Putin is not God, he is just the successor of EBN, whom he awarded the order.
        Putin needs to decide on the people, and he is for the people who work for the oligarchs for a penny.
        Putin decide otherwise the end will be worse than that of Khrushchev, look at China.
        1. Ulan
          Ulan 27 October 2017 19: 51 New
          10
          Yes, here I agree with you. It’s high time for Putin to decide, he is the president of the people who chose him or the president of officials and wealthy Pinocchio.
          Politics, both ours and yours, may suit him, but only for the country is disastrous.
          1. Dmitry Konoplev
            Dmitry Konoplev 27 October 2017 21: 30 New
            +4
            I think we are all wrong, because politics is like a big and fast river. A little stumble and you're already in heaven. It is important to maintain balance. Which, in principle, is trying to do GDP
            1. Golovan Jack
              Golovan Jack 27 October 2017 22: 13 New
              10
              Quote: Dmitry Konoplev
              It’s important to balance

              You're right. But - not feed the horse (damn, and here the horse ... where to go from them).
              The local horse Tingent is used to waving his checkers and, apart from black and white, does not distinguish other colors. Usually.
            2. Arseny_2
              Arseny_2 23 November 2017 13: 50 New
              0
              : All 17 years. Like in a joke: you brake no I'm slow gas,
        2. Orionvit
          Orionvit 28 October 2017 00: 32 New
          +5
          Quote: stas
          Putin is not God

          And write about him as about God. Judging by your comment, everything is in his power, whatever he wants. that will do. Answer me one question. How many decrees of the president have been executed, and how many have lowered by brakes, corrupt and thieving officials?
          he is just a receiver of EBN
          In that case, compare the 90s and 10s, or don’t you remember?
          look at China.
          And what, paradise in China, are all millionaires there and bathe in gold? If you plowed like in China, then you would not say that. And in general, your level of “analytics” seems to have been written off from Navalny rallies, the rhetoric is the same, the meaning is almost the same .. Putin must leave, Assad must leave, and in general, everyone should leave who are not pleasing to overseas curators.
          1. PSih2097
            PSih2097 28 October 2017 15: 44 New
            +2
            Quote: Orionvit
            How many decrees of the president have been executed, and how many have lowered by brakes, corrupt and thieving officials?

            yeah, the "boyars are evil, but the king is good", if you think that Putin knows nothing, then he is worthless as a politician, well, he didn’t start with the government and his sidekick lollipop and then downward, he was required to only the Fas team, but it’s not there and will be?
          2. Med_Dog
            Med_Dog 28 October 2017 21: 07 New
            0
            Hmm, but Putin does not put on corrupt and thieving officials, including his friends? We now blame the officials, but not the king.
    2. Vend
      Vend 27 October 2017 15: 39 New
      0
      Quote: afrikanez
      I wonder how much more you can write about this "miracle of nature"? A lot of honor to this "fabulous" character! am

      This is a miracle of nature character sensibly planned provocation. This is the work of the West, do not go to a fortuneteller. Memorized theses as a record.
      1. stas
        stas 27 October 2017 16: 42 New
        18
        This is a stupid Kremlin idea, but you don’t understand it.
        And there is a trickle for the Tsar, and he is obliged to Sobchak, and here he is fulfilling his debts.
        We will watch the Putin performance - the presidential election. The tandem no longer works.
        1. Vend
          Vend 27 October 2017 16: 47 New
          +3
          Quote: stas
          This is a stupid Kremlin idea, but you don’t understand it.
          And there is a trickle for the Tsar, and he is obliged to Sobchak, and here he is fulfilling his debts.
          We will watch the Putin performance - the presidential election. The tandem no longer works.

          My dear, you not only rave, but also rude. You don’t have enough culture, where can you see simple moves.
          1. stas
            stas 27 October 2017 19: 03 New
            0
            The international anthem of the proletariat has not yet been forgotten.
            1. Golovan Jack
              Golovan Jack 27 October 2017 22: 16 New
              +8
              Quote: stas
              The international anthem of the proletariat has not yet been forgotten.

              The doctor said - to the morgue, then to the morgue (s) laughing
              Quote: Wend
              My dear, you not only rave, but also rude. You don’t have enough culture, where can you see simple moves

              stas, Stas157 are you a relative by any chance? Very much you seem to be speaking wink
              1. Vend
                Vend 30 October 2017 09: 05 New
                0
                Quote: Golovan Jack

                stas, Stas157 are you a relative by any chance? Very much you seem to be speaking wink

                What fright are such conclusions?
      2. Med_Dog
        Med_Dog 28 October 2017 21: 09 New
        0
        This is a miracle of nature character sensibly planned provocation. This is the work of the West, do not go to a fortuneteller. Memorized theses as a record.


        Yeah, Navalny is a project of the State Department.
    3. NIKNN
      NIKNN 27 October 2017 17: 40 New
      +1
      Quote: afrikanez
      I wonder how much more you can write about this "miracle of nature"? A lot of honor to this "fabulous" character!

      smile Laughter is laughter, but now it’s not a parody of history, but almost a copy of historical fact
      Let's not forget that even the fall of Rome began with the introduction of the horse to the Senate
      here you will involuntarily think about it .. lol
  2. alex-cn
    alex-cn 27 October 2017 15: 30 New
    +3
    "Yes, she has a somewhat scandalous reputation, but [LDPR leader] Zhirinovsky’s is also scandalous, and many other [potential] presidential campaigners faced reputational problems."
    But for all that, Zhirinovsky is an intelligent man. It may be a buffoon, but one of those who are advisers to kings, unlike some.
    1. Sergey-svs
      Sergey-svs 27 October 2017 15: 51 New
      +5
      Quote: alex-cn
      But for all that, Zhirinovsky is an intelligent man. It may be a buffoon, but one of those who are advisers to kings, unlike some.

      Regarding his brilliant intellect, everyone here has his own opinion, but the fact that he is a charismatic self-PR man with a well-hung tongue is undoubtedly, in the old days they were called - "scumbag"! It is not for nothing that he has been rubbing himself at the well-fed political feeding trough for over 25 years! yes
      He remembered how they were laughing while looking at his election posters in 1991: - "Well, that’s it. I defended it. Now take your hand out of your pants!" laughing
    2. bnm.99
      bnm.99 27 October 2017 16: 17 New
      +3
      Ksyusha is also not a fool and no less wise than Volfovich and at the same time twice as young
  3. Antianglosax
    Antianglosax 27 October 2017 15: 44 New
    +9
    As I understand it, they are trying to clearly show us that in power we have a bunch of mentally disabled people? Unless, of course, pissing is the Kremlin’s idea ... And if so, the complete degeneration of the Russian establishment is obvious. And how can you respect such profaning DB? Why not Buzov? She's a little prettier ...
  4. Tired
    Tired 27 October 2017 15: 51 New
    0
    "left-conservative movement" ... Against such a paradoxical, postmodern chimera, Ksyushad is not even visible. "left-conservative movement" against the "liberal fascists" ... Both are worse.
  5. Irbenwolf
    Irbenwolf 27 October 2017 15: 53 New
    +3
    Who in their right mind can vote for a pony? The electorate over 40 knows what it is for business, and the electorate under 30 knows what it is for "houses" ... Although juniors can "for fun" ...

    In general, these “nominations of wives” and “equine livestock” look like outright mockery of the law ... of people and the regime.

    1. Patriot_s_Urala
      Patriot_s_Urala 27 October 2017 16: 05 New
      +6
      Bullying of people in the first place and the law just comes from the regime, when he decides to arrange such a circus with horses.
      1. SERGUS
        SERGUS 27 October 2017 17: 19 New
        +3
        Quote: Patriot_s_Urala
        come from the regime when he decides to arrange such a circus with horses.

        I’ve never looked at Dom-2, I think maybe I don’t watch these elections either ... well, in the sense of not attending winked
  6. Wolka
    Wolka 27 October 2017 15: 59 New
    0
    Well, someone should play the role of a technical candidate and Ksenia is doing it with great enthusiasm, especially for good money ...
  7. Gamer
    Gamer 27 October 2017 16: 26 New
    +9
    the so-called presidential elections in the Russian Federation have long been turned into a laughing stock both in the eyes of the entire civilized, democratic world and in the opinion of the few remaining intellectuals in Russia itself. K. Sobchak is a diamond in the pile of what the pro-government media call elections. A shame! GANBA!
  8. bandabas
    bandabas 27 October 2017 16: 28 New
    0
    Oh, Ksenia, Ksenia. Plush skirt, light brown braid. Oh, Ksenia, Ksenia. Do not listen to anyone, and do not go out with anyone today!
  9. Eurodav
    Eurodav 27 October 2017 16: 46 New
    +2
    Quote: stas
    Putin himself creates a devaluation.
    For 17 years, he never developed the state idea of ​​Russia.
    He wants to be both a liberal and a defender of the oligarchs and a patriot of the people who are impoverished due to his economic policy.
    You cannot sit on 3 chairs. Putin is not God, he is just the successor of EBN, whom he awarded the order.
    Putin needs to decide on the people, and he is for the people who work for the oligarchs for a penny.
    Putin decide otherwise the end will be worse than that of Khrushchev, look at China.

    Quote: afrikanez
    I wonder how much more you can write about this "miracle of nature"? A lot of honor to this "fabulous" character! am

    Well, K. Semin can be seen at VO, not everyone was watching, where he said that to discuss this clowning degradation ... You can’t say better ... But ... They are discussing ....
  10. Overlock
    Overlock 27 October 2017 17: 13 New
    0
    Quote: Evrodav
    But ... Discuss ....

    the closer to March, the more and more often
  11. Eurodav
    Eurodav 27 October 2017 17: 23 New
    +2
    Quote: stas
    This is a stupid Kremlin idea, but you don’t understand it.
    And there is a trickle for the Tsar, and he is obliged to Sobchak, and here he is fulfilling his debts.
    We will watch the Putin performance - the presidential election. The tandem no longer works.

    I do not like it, there are many ways out, what is the problem?
  12. Eurodav
    Eurodav 27 October 2017 17: 23 New
    +1
    Quote: Overlock
    Quote: Evrodav
    But ... Discuss ....

    the closer to March, the more and more often

    That's it ...
  13. Eurodav
    Eurodav 27 October 2017 17: 25 New
    +2
    Quote: dsk
    Soros allocates money for the revolution in Russia 18 billion.
    Financier George Soros is allocating $ 18 billion to the Open Society Foundation, which is banned in Russia, to support democracy. One of the world's most famous billionaire philanthropists, George Soros transfers most of his capital to the Open Society Foundation.
    A “sweet couple” will be something to “master”.

    Something strange translates most ... Is this after the recent raids or what? Preparing to throw hooves?
  14. Eurodav
    Eurodav 27 October 2017 17: 29 New
    +1
    Quote: alex-cn
    "Yes, she has a somewhat scandalous reputation, but [LDPR leader] Zhirinovsky’s is also scandalous, and many other [potential] presidential campaigners faced reputational problems."
    But for all that, Zhirinovsky is an intelligent man. It may be a buffoon, but one of those who are advisers to kings, unlike some.

    Scandalous, but not Russophobic, like a horse!
    I emphasize !!!!!!!!!!
  15. 16112014nk
    16112014nk 27 October 2017 17: 32 New
    +5
    Quote: Antianglosaks
    the complete degeneration of the Russian establishment is obvious.

    The degradation of the authorities of the Russian Federation and the debilitation of the population is the result of the activities of the EP and GDP. But this, apparently, is their goal - the collapse of all that is possible and impossible.
  16. Eurodav
    Eurodav 27 October 2017 17: 41 New
    +5
    Quote: Antianglosaks
    As I understand it, they are trying to clearly show us that in power we have a bunch of mentally disabled people? Unless, of course, pissing is the Kremlin’s idea ... And if so, the complete degeneration of the Russian establishment is obvious. And how can you respect such profaning DB? Why not Buzov? She's a little prettier ...

    But why did you deduce that it looks like this: "... they are trying to clearly show us that we have a bunch of mentally defective people in power ..."
    This is us, the people, consider this a bunch! What, after the horse’s declaration of intent, a wave of protests swept across Russia demanding to save the Russians from this candidate as insulting honor, dignity, etc., etc., even by way of a referendum on amendments to the Election Law? Posters may have seen- "Russophobia has no place in power!" etc? This we have allowed so to us, ourselves ... Where is the Party "Great Fatherland" Starikov? Where are she like? Why don't they raise the people to a peaceful, of course, protest against this moral mockery? Silent, damn it ...
    1. Gamer
      Gamer 27 October 2017 18: 19 New
      +6
      Duc Starikov’s party wasn’t allowed elections yet ... years ago. Who! State Department or Right Sector?
      The only way to ignore the election or spoil the ballots. But, as the famous writer and publicist Yuri Ignatievich Mukhin said, 99% of the population * & $% # * which means they will “elect” to go to the polls. In our country, a country with a victorious democracy is no better, in the last elections in my village 60% voted for Yanukovych, in 15, the same 60% for Poroshenko. Those. for the party in power, adjusted for the geographical position of the region.
    2. Mestny
      Mestny 28 October 2017 02: 03 New
      +1
      And this is democracy. There is no reason to refuse registration. But there are Russophobes, for a minute - citizens of the Russian Federation concurrently. So we'll see how many of them actually are.
      What if there are more of them?
  17. andrej-shironov
    andrej-shironov 27 October 2017 17: 58 New
    +4
    Putin and the Government have already devalued the idea of ​​elections with his domestic policy, or rather, its absence. Sobchak here on the side of the bake!
  18. Oleko
    Oleko 27 October 2017 19: 24 New
    +1
    [/ quote] However, if this happens, it will put Vladimir Putin in an extremely uncomfortable position - participation in the elections against two ladies and victory over them, with possibly low turnout, will be perceived as a serious decrease in the status of a politician in the last term. [quote]

    And when the "rafters from Courchevel" took away the votes from the Communist Party and the Liberal Democratic Party, was there also a decline in status? Moreover, on each site there were webcams and it was possible to observe the vote count. But the situation was as follows: 60% of the votes - Putin, 24% - Prokhorov, 8% - Zyuganov, 8% - Zhirinovsky. Duma "elders" sat stunned. They did not expect such numbers. Then they also said that Prokhorov was a protege of the Kremlin. I do not believe that Ksenia is a protege. I do not believe.
  19. Fedya2017
    Fedya2017 27 October 2017 21: 45 New
    +6
    Do not panic and do not be indignant, citizens ... This power will not go anywhere voluntarily. It is they who make fun so over lochtorat.
  20. APASUS
    APASUS 27 October 2017 22: 03 New
    0
    Rats got into a fight in the bank?
    Lehi Navalny has a wife, I would have been doing this for 20 hours a day .................. Lech once?
  21. 1536
    1536 27 October 2017 22: 33 New
    +2
    It will not be possible to activate the “left” for one simple reason: the main party of the Communist Party’s left flank is incapable of reform, just as the CPSU was incapable of this, unable to nominate an acceptable leader to replace the incomprehensible and unpopular person who is now at the head of this organization. Paraphrasing V.I. Lenin: “There is no such party!” Which would be ready to take power in the country and prevent marginals, puppets and other dolls of a certain “Karabas-Barabas” from governing the country (read “the collapse of the country”).
  22. ZAV69
    ZAV69 27 October 2017 23: 54 New
    +1
    Deviation, legitimacy ..... What are they talking about? They live in their virtual world. In reality, whoever holds the state press and the nuclear suitcase in their hands, to whom the security forces are subordinate. Everything will go as written in the election law. And all these “experts” can even discuss networks before shredding.
  23. Dedall
    Dedall 28 October 2017 00: 05 New
    +3
    Now it remains to wait for the nomination of Kadyrov. And then, according to the logic of this article, the national republics will vote for it and further reduce the percentage of GDP. And if at all, then I always felt like a fool when I went to all these elections - those who were elected in the State Department will still win.
  24. Mestny
    Mestny 28 October 2017 01: 57 New
    +2
    Quote: stas
    Putin needs to decide on the people, and he is for the people who work for the oligarchs for a penny.

    Wake up! What kind of people? In the courtyard of capitalism! Where did you get this socialist rhetoric from the times of the USSR?
    Under capitalism, for a minute, "the people" always "work for the oligarchs for a penny."
    1. tasha
      tasha 28 October 2017 05: 24 New
      +1
      We have oligarchs. We do not have capitalism. The great paradox ... however wink
  25. Med_Dog
    Med_Dog 28 October 2017 21: 18 New
    0
    Oh, if Navalny is allowed to the polls, then I’ll look at 89% of Putin’s approval rating.
  26. Stepan Kudinov
    Stepan Kudinov 29 October 2017 15: 30 New
    +1
    A. Wasserman said in a box that she was nothing and there was NO NEED to talk about her.
  27. Gormenghast
    Gormenghast 30 October 2017 13: 44 New
    0
    the severity of everyday life of a strong and independent woman


    Straight to tear, poor; collects food in the trash. laughing

    What we see now is, rather, a kind of high-budget show, and as a professional I can say that it’s of rather low quality


    All "Dom-2" does not give rest; there quality is on top! laughing
  28. Vicon
    Vicon 30 October 2017 22: 34 New
    0
    Dear Sirs / Comrades! Again, talk about bad, good master / sovereign. The problem is not sucker / good, the problem is in the system. One was destroyed - it is bad, the other - good, not only not built, but no one knows what it should be. In the meantime, “smart” guys offer new ideas, masterpieces, cunning officials and oligarchs take away the country, calling themselves successful and able to work. And the third of all arrange the show, again making money.
    1. Golovan Jack
      Golovan Jack 30 October 2017 23: 14 New
      +8
      Quote: Vicon
      another - good, not only not built, but also no who doesn't know what it should be

      There should have been "none".
      Here is a cable for you to tighten the paper, I would look at you, and would believe ...
      And so - you write a fierce triviality, to the need of local pique vests.
      Well, too ... entertainment of its kind request
  29. Galan
    Galan 31 October 2017 20: 12 New
    0
    Does it make sense to further discuss the nonsense of Western elites? They act on the principle that if you can’t influence the outcome of an event, turn it into a farce.