NATO sees no evidence that Russia supplies weapons to the Taliban

The North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) does not have data that would confirm the accuracy of the recent assumptions about the transfer of Russia weapons radical movement "Taliban" (prohibited in the Russian Federation). This was admitted on Wednesday in an interview with a group of journalists, including the TASS correspondent, the head of the NATO Military Committee, Czech General Peter Pavel.

Regarding the first part of your question, about the (allegedly taking place) Russian supply of weapons to the [Taliban] movement. I do not see and have not seen any solid evidence of Russia delivering weapons to the [Taliban] movement

- said the commander of the North Atlantic alliance.

We remind you that earlier, US Secretary of State Rex Tillerson accused Moscow of supplying weapons to the Afghan Taliban banned in Russia.

Russia does supply weapons to the Taliban, and this violates international norms and norms of the UN Security Council. We certainly object to this. If someone is going to deliver weapons to this country, then it should go through the Afghan government.

- Said the head of American diplomacy.

Comments

[Observer2014]

NATO sees no evidence that Russia supplies weapons to the Taliban

Well, fine. Just who is it or what is NATO compared to the US Secretary of State?

[Andrey K]

Observer2014
NATA is the fifth point on duty for any of Sasha’s functionaries
They sometimes do not communicate with each other, they live on their own

[Observer2014]

Andrey K E.

They sometimes do not communicate with each other, they live on their own

Yeah. And they pretend that they decide on an equal footing with the United States. So to say, a friendly family In general, let them think.

[Shurik70]

Quote: Observer2014

What is NATO compared to the US Secretary of State?

The US government is mysterious. Especially Secretary of State

October 22:
Russia supplies weapons to the Taliban-a violation of international norms and norms of the UN Security Council
https://russian.rt.com/inotv/2017-08-23/PBS-gosse
kretar-SSHA-obvinil-Russia

October 23:
Taliban may be allowed to rule Afghanistan
http://rossaprimavera.ru/news/0a57773f

[Orionvit]

Quote: Shurik70

The US government is mysterious. Especially Secretary of State

On the contrary. The US government is very predictable, especially the Secretary of State. You know in advance what they will say on this or that issue.

[210ox]

If you don’t even see it, then still .. you can think of it. And people pick it up ..

Quote: Observer2014

NATO sees no evidence that Russia supplies weapons to the Taliban

Well, fine. Just who is it or what is NATO compared to the US Secretary of State?

[Reserve officer]

"I do not see and did not see any solid evidence of Russia's delivery of arms to the Taliban"

And who cares in the US? He sees or does not see. A couple of kicks - and the Czech general will instantly see clearly. And it will be even louder than all that Russia is to blame.

[Orionvit]

Quote: Reserve officer

And who cares in the US? He sees or does not see.

That's for sure. When are these states, if they are blaming someone for something, bothering with evidence? The main thing is to blame, and the job is done, there already the corrupt press is circulating, the "right" point of view. Although I’m lying, I remember one “proof”, a commemorative test tube, with washing powder.

[Kent0001]

they have everything there hawala people. soon their own bowel movements from anger at Russia will begin to eat.

[LSA57]

Quote: Observer2014

Just who or what is NATO compared to the US Secretary of State?

who has at hand a whole Phashington regional committee. and this is not Khuhra Mukhra.

Head of the NATO Military Committee Czech General Peter Pavel.

do they Czech general authority?

[79807420129]

I do not see or saw any hard evidence

I didn’t see soft evidence, you dunce. your NATO with the USA, every plug in the hole.

[Andrey K]

... NATO does not see evidence that Russia supplies weapons to the Taliban ...

Some kind of NATA fickle, windy
She composed a mule about deliveries to the Taliban, buzzed, slew, now she doesn’t believe herself
The horror is simple, the fork of NAT

[Partyzan]

Quote: Andrey K

The horror is simple, the fork of NAT

Nata and does not see what supplies weapons to the barmaley

[Herculesic]

And then this pavel, which is also a pedr, added that undoubtedly, the Taliban’s weapons are received from Russia, for without Russia the earth will begin to turn in the opposite direction! !!

[Ace Tambourine]

but simply ... only when changing directions, in flight, don’t start yelling ...

[Ace Tambourine]

That Russia is again to blame for everything ...

[poquello]

If someone is going to supply weapons to this country, then it must go through the Afghan government

comfortably, the telesonchik, Karzai was afraid or what?

[izya top]

The North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) does not have data that would confirm the reliability of recent assumptions about Russia's transfer of arms to the Taliban radical movement (banned in Russia)

and when the lack of data prevented the West from blaming us?

[Pete mitchell]

Quote: iza top

..and when the lack of data prevented the West from blaming us?

Yes, never: at first they came up with a horror story, then they drove it into the brain of the public, then they together managed it and drove the charges to stamp. Americans have long learned that gentlemen believe “word for word,” and they hit the map. It’s time for Russia to learn that they’re sitting at a table with cheaters, it’s often necessary to hit in the face ...

[izya top]

Quote: Pete Mitchell

here you often have to hit in the face ..

candelabrum

[Pete mitchell]

Quote: iza top

candelabrum

You are so intelligent-candelabra. They didn’t read the classics, I think it’s going to be “anyhow”

[Orionvit]

Quote: Pete Mitchell

It’s time for Russia to learn that they’re sitting at a table with cheaters, it’s often necessary to hit in the face ...

"And if someone cheats, we will hit in the face, in the impudent, red face."
An old joke.

[Vasyan1971]

"NATO sees no evidence that Russia is delivering Taliban weapons."
Strange ...
“I don’t see and did not see any solid evidence of Russia's delivery of arms to the [Taliban] Taliban.”
Well, at least there were some soft ones? And then somehow embarrassing. They can also dismiss for part-time job.

[APASUS]

[quoteNATO does not see evidence that Russia supplies weapons to the Taliban] [/ quote]
Now some kind of hell from the “Laboratory of Conscience” from London (this is a fictitious name) will tell the whole world that he has evidence of the delivery of arms to the Taliban by the Russians and the US Congress will boldly accept the next package of sanctions against Russia.

How easy is it to calculate?

[svp67]

Czech general Peter Pavel.

Well, nothing, now a 70-year-old bitch will appear, in the form of the US representative to NATO, and she will quickly correct his vision and teach him how to speak ...

[KVashentcev]

Although NATO does not see it, it’s basically discerned and there’s nothing whatsoever ...

[aszzz888]

US Secretary of State Rex Tillerson accused Moscow of supplying weapons to the Afghan Taliban, which was banned in Russia.

... this official representative, the whole secretary of state, allows himself the tricks of a sharpie and huckster ... it’s time to accustom this rex to the “At the foot!” team ... to give the media that we’ll give another order, the mericatos themselves will expel him .. .

[Mavrikiy]

Head of the NATO Military Committee Czech General Peter Pavel I do not see and did not see any solid evidence of Russia's delivery of arms to the [Taliban] Taliban
Our person.
US Secretary of State Rex Tillerson Russia really supplies weapons to the Taliban,
Not our man.
Tear up, and it pleases.

[Sergey53]

But we see NATO weapons from the TERRORISTS in Syria.