Military Review

NATO sees no evidence that Russia supplies weapons to the Taliban

31
The North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) does not have data that would confirm the accuracy of the recent assumptions about the transfer of Russia weapons radical movement "Taliban" (prohibited in the Russian Federation). This was admitted on Wednesday in an interview with a group of journalists, including the TASS correspondent, the head of the NATO Military Committee, Czech General Peter Pavel.


NATO sees no evidence that Russia supplies weapons to the Taliban


Regarding the first part of your question, about the (allegedly taking place) Russian supply of weapons to the [Taliban] movement. I do not see and have not seen any solid evidence of Russia delivering weapons to the [Taliban] movement
- said the commander of the North Atlantic alliance.

We remind you that earlier, US Secretary of State Rex Tillerson accused Moscow of supplying weapons to the Afghan Taliban banned in Russia.

Russia does supply weapons to the Taliban, and this violates international norms and norms of the UN Security Council. We certainly object to this. If someone is going to deliver weapons to this country, then it should go through the Afghan government.
- Said the head of American diplomacy.
Photos used:
TASS
31 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Observer2014
    Observer2014 25 October 2017 19: 58 New
    +4
    NATO sees no evidence that Russia supplies weapons to the Taliban
    Well, fine. Just who is it or what is NATO compared to the US Secretary of State?
    1. Andrey K
      Andrey K 25 October 2017 20: 04 New
      +5
      Observer2014 hi
      NATA is the fifth point on duty for any of Sasha’s functionaries laughing
      They sometimes do not communicate with each other, they live on their own lol
      1. Observer2014
        Observer2014 25 October 2017 20: 17 New
        +3
        Andrey K E. hi soldier
        They sometimes do not communicate with each other, they live on their own
        Yeah. And they pretend that they decide on an equal footing with the United States. So to say, a friendly family laughing In general, let them think.
        1. Shurik70
          Shurik70 25 October 2017 22: 23 New
          0
          Quote: Observer2014
          What is NATO compared to the US Secretary of State?

          The US government is mysterious. Especially Secretary of State wassat

          October 22:
          Russia supplies weapons to the Taliban-a violation of international norms and norms of the UN Security Council
          https://russian.rt.com/inotv/2017-08-23/PBS-gosse
          kretar-SSHA-obvinil-Rossiyu


          October 23:
          Taliban may be allowed to rule Afghanistan
          http://rossaprimavera.ru/news/0a57773f
          1. Orionvit
            Orionvit 26 October 2017 09: 22 New
            0
            Quote: Shurik70
            The US government is mysterious. Especially Secretary of State

            On the contrary. The US government is very predictable, especially the Secretary of State. You know in advance what they will say on this or that issue.
    2. 210ox
      210ox 25 October 2017 20: 07 New
      +4
      If you don’t even see it, then still .. you can think of it. And people pick it up ..
      Quote: Observer2014
      NATO sees no evidence that Russia supplies weapons to the Taliban
      Well, fine. Just who is it or what is NATO compared to the US Secretary of State?
      1. Reserve officer
        Reserve officer 25 October 2017 21: 20 New
        +3
        "I do not see and did not see any solid evidence of Russia's delivery of arms to the Taliban"

        And who cares in the US? He sees or does not see. A couple of kicks - and the Czech general will instantly see clearly. And it will be even louder than all that Russia is to blame.
        1. Orionvit
          Orionvit 26 October 2017 09: 27 New
          +1
          Quote: Stock Officer
          And who cares in the US? He sees or does not see.

          That's for sure. When are these states, if they are blaming someone for something, bothering with evidence? The main thing is to blame, and the job is done, there already the corrupt press is circulating, the "right" point of view. Although I’m lying, I remember one “proof”, a commemorative test tube, with washing powder.
      2. Kent0001
        Kent0001 25 October 2017 22: 20 New
        0
        they have everything there hawala people. soon their own bowel movements from anger at Russia will begin to eat.
    3. LSA57
      LSA57 25 October 2017 20: 18 New
      +7
      Quote: Observer2014
      Just who or what is NATO compared to the US Secretary of State?

      who has at hand a whole Phashington regional committee. and this is not Khuhra Mukhra.
      Head of the NATO Military Committee Czech General Peter Pavel.

      do they Czech general authority?
    4. Starper-m
      Starper-m 25 October 2017 20: 21 New
      +2
      Russia does supply weapons to the Taliban, and this violates international norms and those of the UN Security Council.

      You are the United States, Ukraine supplying cookies, we are the Taliban .. Everything is fair (almost)
      Here’s Hezbollah, we’ll deliver something (like your “javelins”, etc.) to Iran, North Korea, etc.
      Until you gentlemen leave Our Ukraine! Normal alignment? soldier
      1. Partyzan
        Partyzan 25 October 2017 20: 35 New
        +8
        Quote: Starper-M
        You are the United States, Ukraine supplying cookies, we are the Taliban .. Everything is fair (almost)

    5. 79807420129
      79807420129 25 October 2017 20: 21 New
      12
      I do not see or saw any hard evidence

      I didn’t see soft evidence, you dunce. laughing your NATO with the USA, every plug in the hole.
  2. Andrey K
    Andrey K 25 October 2017 19: 58 New
    +6
    ... NATO does not see evidence that Russia supplies weapons to the Taliban ...

    Some kind of NATA fickle, windy laughing
    She composed a mule about deliveries to the Taliban, buzzed, slew, now she doesn’t believe herself wassat
    The horror is simple, the fork of NAT lol
    1. Partyzan
      Partyzan 25 October 2017 20: 10 New
      +7
      Quote: Andrey K
      The horror is simple, the fork of NAT

      Nata and does not see what supplies weapons to the barmaley
  3. Herculesic
    Herculesic 25 October 2017 20: 01 New
    0
    And then this pavel, which is also a pedr, added that undoubtedly, the Taliban’s weapons are received from Russia, for without Russia the earth will begin to turn in the opposite direction! !! lol
    1. Ace Tambourine
      Ace Tambourine 26 October 2017 11: 16 New
      0
      but simply ... only when changing directions, in flight, don’t start yelling ...
      1. Ace Tambourine
        Ace Tambourine 26 October 2017 11: 32 New
        0
        That Russia is again to blame for everything ...
  4. poquello
    poquello 25 October 2017 20: 15 New
    +1
    If someone is going to supply weapons to this country, then it must go through the Afghan government

    comfortably, the telesonchik, Karzai was afraid or what?
  5. izya top
    izya top 25 October 2017 20: 19 New
    +2
    The North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) does not have data that would confirm the reliability of recent assumptions about Russia's transfer of arms to the Taliban radical movement (banned in Russia)
    and when the lack of data prevented the West from blaming us? request what
    1. Pete mitchell
      Pete mitchell 26 October 2017 04: 10 New
      +6
      Quote: iza top
      ..and when the lack of data prevented the West from blaming us? request what

      Yes, never: at first they came up with a horror story, then they drove it into the brain of the public, then they together managed it and drove the charges to stamp. Americans have long learned that gentlemen believe “word for word,” and they hit the map. It’s time for Russia to learn that they’re sitting at a table with cheaters, it’s often necessary to hit in the face ...
      1. izya top
        izya top 26 October 2017 04: 32 New
        +1
        Quote: Pete Mitchell
        here you often have to hit in the face ..

        candelabrum yes
        1. Pete mitchell
          Pete mitchell 26 October 2017 06: 17 New
          +5
          Quote: iza top
          candelabrum yes

          You are so intelligent-candelabra. They didn’t read the classics, I think it’s going to be “anyhow” angry
      2. Orionvit
        Orionvit 26 October 2017 09: 31 New
        +1
        Quote: Pete Mitchell
        It’s time for Russia to learn that they’re sitting at a table with cheaters, it’s often necessary to hit in the face ...

        "And if someone cheats, we will hit in the face, in the impudent, red face."
        An old joke.
  6. Vasyan1971
    Vasyan1971 25 October 2017 20: 29 New
    0
    "NATO sees no evidence that Russia is delivering Taliban weapons."
    Strange ...
    “I don’t see and did not see any solid evidence of Russia's delivery of arms to the [Taliban] Taliban.”
    Well, at least there were some soft ones? And then somehow embarrassing. They can also dismiss for part-time job.
  7. APASUS
    APASUS 25 October 2017 20: 33 New
    +1
    [quoteNATO does not see evidence that Russia supplies weapons to the Taliban] [/ quote]
    Now some kind of hell from the “Laboratory of Conscience” from London (this is a fictitious name) will tell the whole world that he has evidence of the delivery of arms to the Taliban by the Russians and the US Congress will boldly accept the next package of sanctions against Russia.

    How easy is it to calculate?
  8. svp67
    svp67 25 October 2017 20: 37 New
    +3
    Czech general Peter Pavel.
    Well, nothing, now a 70-year-old bitch will appear, in the form of the US representative to NATO, and she will quickly correct his vision and teach him how to speak ...
  9. KVashentcev
    KVashentcev 25 October 2017 22: 25 New
    0
    Although NATO does not see it, it’s basically discerned and there’s nothing whatsoever ...
  10. aszzz888
    aszzz888 26 October 2017 00: 29 New
    0
    US Secretary of State Rex Tillerson accused Moscow of supplying weapons to the Afghan Taliban, which was banned in Russia.

    ... this official representative, the whole secretary of state, allows himself the tricks of a sharpie and huckster ... it’s time to accustom this rex to the “At the foot!” team ... to give the media that we’ll give another order, the mericatos themselves will expel him .. . bully
  11. Mavrikiy
    Mavrikiy 26 October 2017 05: 12 New
    0
    Head of the NATO Military Committee Czech General Peter Pavel I do not see and did not see any solid evidence of Russia's delivery of arms to the [Taliban] Taliban
    Our person.
    US Secretary of State Rex Tillerson Russia really supplies weapons to the Taliban,
    Not our man.
    Tear up, and it pleases.
  12. Sergey53
    Sergey53 26 October 2017 14: 18 New
    0
    But we see NATO weapons from the TERRORISTS in Syria.