Military Review

Xi Jinping re-elected General Secretary of the Communist Party Central Committee

38
Chinese President Xi Jinping re-elected Secretary General of the Chinese Communist Party Central Committee, with five of the seven members of the standing committee of the Politburo of the CPC Central Committee changing, the correspondent reports. RIA News from Beijing.




In addition to Jinping, Premier Li Keqiang also retained a place in the Central Committee.

“Vice-Premier of the State Council Wang Yang, head of the Shanghai Party Committee Han Zhang, head of the office of the CPC Central Committee Li Zhanshu, head of the Organizational Department of the CPC Central Committee Zhao Leji and head of the Center for Political Studies under the CPC Central Committee Wang Juning,“ are included in the new PCPB, ”the report said.

At the first plenum of the Chinese Communist Party's Central Committee 19, the new Political Bureau of the Central Committee was elected, and 25 people, including only one woman, were elected to it.

The agency recalls that earlier delegates to the 19 CPC Congress approved amendments to the statutes, the most important of which was the introduction of the name of Xi Jinping into the text of the main party document. This circumstance put the current Secretary General on par with Mao Zedong and Deng Xiaoping. At the same time, Xi Jinping became the second Chinese leader after the donkey Mao Zedong, whose name was added to the statute of the CCP during his lifetime.
Photos used:
http://www.globallookpress.com
38 comments
Ad

The editorial board of Voenniy Obozreniye urgently needs a proofreader. Requirements: impeccable knowledge of the Russian language, diligence, discipline. Contact: [email protected]

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. SERGE ANT
    SERGE ANT 25 October 2017 08: 15 New
    +9
    Well done Chinese ... For the past quarter century, where are we and where are they ... am
    1. dauria
      dauria 25 October 2017 08: 55 New
      +4
      Well done Chinese.


      And it is worth noting - neither "popular" elections, nor presidential candidates. The political bureau gathered, sat, talked and chose.
  2. Same lech
    Same lech 25 October 2017 08: 16 New
    +3
    In Chinese ... the Jinping dynasty ... the communist is true ... but the essence of this does not change. smile
    1. 210ox
      210ox 25 October 2017 08: 21 New
      +8
      Smart people .. They see who is worth it. It's only with us .. "... to the ground we will destroy ..."
      Quote: The same Lech
      In Chinese ... the Jinping dynasty ... the communist is true ... but the essence of this does not change. smile
    2. SERGE ANT
      SERGE ANT 25 October 2017 08: 29 New
      +8
      By the way, they don’t have dynasties, like in the DPRK, and they don’t have a cabal, like ours, and elevators work career for youth, who’s ruling the court in no way (not only in skyscrapers) ... That’s why, where is China, and where are we with the Koreans ...
    3. Solomon Kane
      Solomon Kane 25 October 2017 08: 55 New
      +8
      Well, if I need the Party .... If the comrades have trusted me ...... I agree - I stay .....

      Painfully familiar ......
      1. dauria
        dauria 25 October 2017 09: 08 New
        +8
        Well, if I need the Party .... If the comrades have trusted me.


        Vain irony. Even towards the end, people saw just an old, sick, albeit a funny but RESPECTED person. He also had two worries - a country and a dumb daughter.
        1. Solomon Kane
          Solomon Kane 25 October 2017 09: 20 New
          +8
          "See the root ...", said Kuzma Prutkov ....
          This is not about Leonid Ilyich, as a person, but about elected traditions in the Communist Party, Wh. and Chinese ....
        2. Hagalaz
          Hagalaz 25 October 2017 09: 21 New
          0
          I allow myself to disagree with your statement. I remember very well that RESPECT this man evoked little. Yes, they did not vilify as it is now possible, but before that, people used to have other organs ....
          1. Iskander Sh
            Iskander Sh 25 October 2017 09: 31 New
            +3
            Quote: Hagalaz
            I remember very well that RESPECT this man evoked little.



            This is in the end, when he really fell into insanity. People were insulted that their country was represented by such a "vegetable" and they were angry, first of all, at the Politburo, which could not choose a new state secretary because of its own internal squabbles.
            1. Hagalaz
              Hagalaz 25 October 2017 09: 58 New
              0
              Well, that's about it. About the last periud.
            2. weksha50
              weksha50 25 October 2017 10: 36 New
              +1
              Quote: Iskander Sh
              and they were primarily angry at the Politburo, which could not choose a new secretary of state because of its own internal squabbles.


              All of them could ... But they even put Chernenko - a disabled person in general, who could not move without help ...
              And when Andropov was put on - didn’t they know that he was seriously ill?
              And then they put a young one ... They thought, probably, that they would be able to control it ... Well, maybe they could have ...
              Yes, they didn’t manage to manage Raisa Maximovna, they didn’t have enough strength ... laughing
          2. weksha50
            weksha50 25 October 2017 10: 33 New
            +4
            Quote: Hagalaz
            I remember very well that RESPECT this man evoked little. Yes, they did not vilify as it is now possible, but before that, people used to have other organs ....



            Hmm ... Indiscreet question: How old are you?
            I remember very well how, after Khrushchev, the time of Brezhnev came ... And the first thing I remembered was that my father stopped waking me at 4-5 in the morning so that I would take a turn for bread from chaff ...
            It was later, after many years, they began to whine about some kind of "stagnation" ...
            Before condemning politicians, one must live in their own time ... And not read the yellow pages, which now include a lot of political and historical literature ...
            1. Hagalaz
              Hagalaz 25 October 2017 11: 25 New
              0
              Quote: weksha50
              Quote: Hagalaz
              I remember very well that RESPECT this man evoked little. Yes, they did not vilify as it is now possible, but before that, people used to have other organs ....



              Hmm ... Indiscreet question: How old are you?
              I remember very well how, after Khrushchev, the time of Brezhnev came ... And the first thing I remembered was that my father stopped waking me at 4-5 in the morning so that I would take a turn for bread from chaff ...
              It was later, after many years, they began to whine about some kind of "stagnation" ...
              Before condemning politicians, one must live in their own time ... And not read the yellow pages, which now include a lot of political and historical literature ...

              The last years of the Brezhnev era, he studied at school. I perfectly remember the giggles of adults in relation to the general secretary. With the concept of respect, in my understanding, this, let's say, does not really correlate.
              What makes you think that I condemn someone, I am stating a fact. The fact of the last period of the reign, about which, by the way. Any person MUST know a sense of proportion. Otherwise, there is a risk of becoming, for example, a laughing stock. Despite past merits.
            2. Hagalaz
              Hagalaz 25 October 2017 11: 32 New
              0
              You yourself are not very lived in Khrushchev, I see. And judging by the nickname used, they didn’t really respect him.
              1. weksha50
                weksha50 25 October 2017 15: 59 New
                +2
                Quote: Hagalaz
                You yourself are not very lived in Khrushchev, I see. And judging by the nickname used, they didn’t really respect him.



                Um ... I didn’t understand what my review about Khrushchev (nickname) and Brezhnev, about which you so disrespectfully spoke about ... What happened during Khrushchev’s reign ... And yes, after a while I didn’t respected ... If you say about space, nuclear power - these are not his achievements ... They were laid by Stalin, Beria, their associates and the Soviet people ...
                And I said that under Khrushchev it was not easy for people to live ...
                And you again about Brezhnev: "Any person must know a sense of proportion" ...
                Yes, I did explain, and you would need to know that: this person (LIB) wrote statements to the Politburo three times with a request to relieve him of the position of General Secretary ... Three times !!! And MI (Suslov, in particular) was convenient to keep Parsley on the platform and manage it because of the screen ...
                Yes, I myself mocked his Stars and awards, spit on the awarding of the Order of Victory, his "chelomania" ... But it was already insanity ... THERE was already an old, sick man ...
                To mock, but better to judge, it is necessary for those who allowed it before ... That a powerful puppet was at the head of a powerful state ... Now we say that the Brokeback ruined the Union ... But aren't the legs of the collapse from those times growing? Brezhnev, like a clown, was recently kept ... Andropov, who practically controlled the country from bed and (!!!) still tried to restore at least some order ... Chernenko ... Even no words ...
                That's where the betrayal grew ... But - not from an old, sick person ... Yeah ... Tits, pussy ... However, for the country, he did much more than the same Khrushchev, or those who were after him ...
      2. Lord of the Sith
        Lord of the Sith 25 October 2017 09: 36 New
        +1
        By the way, the movie is cool!
      3. weksha50
        weksha50 25 October 2017 10: 29 New
        +2
        Quote: Solomon Kane
        Well, if I need the Party .... If the comrades have trusted me ...... I agree - I stay .....


        Um ... Solomon ... It seems that he always made the impression of a sober man ... After all, you yourself know that LIB wrote a statement to the Politburo three times with a request to relieve him of the post of General Secretary for old age and lack of health ... But IT was beneficial to him THIS keep in mind, in fact, managing not so much LI as the state behind him ... And all the bumps and fakes went to the old, sick senile ...
        Not solid ... hi
      4. Pancir026
        Pancir026 27 October 2017 11: 54 New
        0
        Quote: Solomon Kane
        Painfully familiar ...

        It is foolish to interpret the essence of the decision in China.
  3. Mountain shooter
    Mountain shooter 25 October 2017 08: 19 New
    +2
    And what, there were doubts? The mortal battle of the USA and China for world leadership is yet to come ...
    No luck striatum. Bad dessert served Comrade C in Florida (Tomahawks hit Syria)
    1. Same lech
      Same lech 25 October 2017 08: 21 New
      +4
      Bad dessert served Comrade C in Florida (Tomahawks hit Syria)

      Yes, here TRUMP was heavily screwed up, puzzling Comrade SI with this surprise ... the Chinese have not decided to spoil their appetite during meals. smile
  4. zivXP
    zivXP 25 October 2017 08: 23 New
    +3
    after donkey Mao Zedong,

    Who is a donkey?
  5. Mar.Tirah
    Mar.Tirah 25 October 2017 08: 33 New
    +5
    Quote: SERGE ANT
    Well done Chinese ... For the past quarter century, where are we and where are they ... am

    China is building socialism with a human face, and is trying to adapt it to the realities of modern life. Here and now they are restructuring their line in such a way as to move away from the ideas of Marxism .. But not as we rushing from edge to edge. CPSU nomenclature, closely began to live within the framework of the party’s program. And let’s go over to capitalism. And into the wild. Let’s heal Well, the people ...... and what the people? Somehow they will survive. Here we live like that. And no one was held responsible.
  6. Shurale
    Shurale 25 October 2017 08: 40 New
    +1
    Where are the democratic forces looking? It's a damn cult personality almost !!!

    Pysy Vadim Smirnov it was irony and not trolling, train a sense of humor. Seven warnings due to his absence are not funny. You are not in that position that would not understand this.
  7. Masya masya
    Masya masya 25 October 2017 08: 49 New
    +6
    Constancy is a sign of stability.
    Stability is the foundation of prosperity.
    1. cniza
      cniza 25 October 2017 08: 52 New
      +4
      Yes, and they have a saying - "God forbid you live in an era of change."
      1. Solomon Kane
        Solomon Kane 25 October 2017 09: 32 New
        +8
        five out of seven members of the Standing Committee of the Politburo left their posts.
        And what about us, the committee of “common flukes”, as it sat in the warmth, sits ...
        We won’t live well until such garbage happens in the country - ministers are being planted,
        and the prime minister smiles - everything is purple to him ...
        In China, the prime minister would be shot along with bribe takers, in Japan he would have made a seppuku, and we have on skis ...... posing wassat
        Vit, hello dear !!! hi
        1. cniza
          cniza 25 October 2017 09: 43 New
          +2
          Hi Kostya! hi , and we have a merry-go-round, everything in a circle and do not clean anyone.
  8. weksha50
    weksha50 25 October 2017 10: 26 New
    0
    "In addition to Jinping, Premier of the State Council Li Keqiang also retained a place in the Central Committee".

    Well ... For us, for Russia this is good news ... Although the East is a delicate matter, however, Xi and Pu seem to have some kind of mutual understanding ...
    But he powerfully struck a dictatorship and approved: "approved amendments to the charter, the most important of which was the inclusion of the name of Xi Jinping in the text of the main party document. This fact put the current Secretary General on a par with Mao Zedong and Deng Xiaoping."... good
    1. Pancir026
      Pancir026 27 October 2017 12: 05 New
      +1
      Quote: weksha50
      But he powerfully struck a dictatorship and approved

      "We will try to build a new model of relations with the United States and a comprehensive strategic partnership with Russia - a partnership for peace, growth, reform among different European civilizations. Partnership of unity and cooperation of the BRICS countries," Xi Jinping agency, speaking at the UN in Geneva, quotes.
      The figures of the other five members also say a lot, all of which are newly elected. Looking at them, it becomes clear that Xi Jinping, who is betting on the development of strategic cooperation relations with Russia, has powerfully strengthened his positions in the PC and the Politburo of the CPC Central Committee.
      Absolutely loyal Xi man entered the PC - Li Zhangshu, the main ideologist of the strategic union with Russia in China
      State Council Vice Premier Wang Yang, recently awarded the Russian Order of Friendship "for his great contribution to strengthening relations between Russia and China," became another member of this powerful structure.
      And as a result of what is happening in the PRC, the most important task is not to ensure non-sky-high economic growth rates through export, but to increase production efficiency and gradually reorient its significant part to its own needs.
      Why do you have to implement painful reforms in industry and the public sector, millions of people and dismiss, and re-teach. And, most importantly, to continue to fight decisively against corruption so that it - following the example of the USSR - does not destroy the country, corrupting and decomposing its elite first.
      All these imperiously put on the agenda tasks and put the party congress ended. They are obvious: an even more determined fight against corruption, iron discipline in the party, balanced development, reduction of inequality become more important than the economic growth rate.
      Xi Jinping has publicly stated that Russia is an important partner of China in the development of “One Belt, One Way”. Sino-Russian cooperation has excellent and broad potential prospects. At the end of the meeting on July 4, Putin said that they had a reliable working relationship with Xi Jinping, as well as strong friendships. In addition, cooperation was achieved in such areas as investment, energy, cultural exchange.
      http://voprosik.net/zachem-si-czinpin-vstrechalsy
      as-putinym /
      1. weksha50
        weksha50 27 October 2017 12: 21 New
        0
        Quote: Pancir026
        And as a result of what is happening in the PRC, the most important task is not to ensure non-sky-high economic growth rates through export, but to increase production efficiency and gradually reorient its significant part to its own needs.


        Honestly, I envy the good ...
        After all, a hunchbacked bastard could go that way ...
  9. Slon_on
    Slon_on 25 October 2017 13: 31 New
    +2
    It turns out that it was not for nothing that they called the leadership of the CPSU the revisionists who had departed from the teachings of Marx, Lenin, and Stalin. History has shown that they are right. There is neither the USSR (unfortunately), nor the CPSU (in the form in which it was in recent years - it is not a pity), and China - the second, if not the first economy in the world.
    1. Sergej1972
      Sergej1972 25 October 2017 13: 52 New
      0
      They called the leadership of the USSR revisionists in the days of Mao. At the time of Dan, these charges against the USSR were dropped.))
      1. weksha50
        weksha50 25 October 2017 16: 02 New
        0
        Quote: Sergej1972
        They called the leadership of the USSR revisionists in the days of Mao. At the time of Dan, these charges against the USSR were dropped.))


        You put a little in the wrong place and not so much emphasis ... Not at the time of Mao, but at the time of Khrushchev (!!!) .... That's who spoiled all relations between the USSR and the Chinese ...

        PS Mao was then, but under Stalin he considered him a teacher, but Khrushchev considered him a revisionist ...
        Actually, Khrushchev played into the hands of Mao, because he was still weighed down by pressure from the USSR and Stalin ... He wanted the Union to help him as much as possible, BUT (!!!) did not dictate any of his conditions ... Khrushch his actions to denigrate Stalin helped Mao to get out of the custody and influence of the USSR ... At least he gave him the allegedly serious reason for the break ...
        1. Sergej1972
          Sergej1972 27 October 2017 11: 51 New
          0
          In one form or another, but the cult of personality would still be criticized in the USSR. Malenkov already a few days after the death of Stalin at meetings spoke about the destructiveness of the personality cult. And he instructed reporters not to be too zealous in praising the deceased leader. An adventurous "big leap" would be condemned under Stalin, and under Malenkov, and under Molotov.)) The same can be said about the "cultural revolution" that began in 1966. By the way, Leonid Ilyich spoke about Mao and Maoism no less sharply than Nikita Sergeevich.))
          Judging by Soviet newspapers and magazines, people began to be informed about disagreements with the PRC sometime since 1961.
          On the other hand, at the end of 1956-1957. Mao publicly spoke out several times in support of the decisions of the 20th Congress of the CPSU. Both under Khrushchev and Brezhnev, the Chinese were quite critical of Stalin. It was simply that the scale of criticism was smaller than in the USSR, and was often criticized for other aspects of its actions. For the policy of the Comintern with regard to China, for the policy with regard to Xinjiang, etc. In general, according to Mao, Stalin was 70% right, and 30% wrong.))
          1. Sergej1972
            Sergej1972 27 October 2017 12: 01 New
            +1
            Objectively speaking, in the PRC at the turn of the 50-60s. a lot of ill-conceived decisions were made in the field of domestic and foreign policy, economics, and culture. And sometimes just stupid, idiotic. And how was the Soviet leadership to react? Plus, condemning the leadership of the USSR for revisionism, the leaders of China at the turn of the 60s and 70s. constantly shied from extreme to extreme in foreign policy. After all, one must also take into account the fact of the ongoing factional struggle in the leadership of the CCP of that time, as well as the fact of the struggle for influence on the old and sick Mao.
          2. weksha50
            weksha50 27 October 2017 12: 23 New
            0
            Quote: Sergej1972
            In one form or another, but the cult of personality would still be criticized in the USSR.


            I just drew attention to the emphasis, WHO - WHEN - WHY called the USSR and the CPSU revisionists ... It was not Mao’s personality ... although it was also about her ...
  10. rruvim
    rruvim 25 October 2017 22: 21 New
    0
    No comments:
    https://yandex.ru/video/search?text=%D0%B3%D0%B8%
    D0%BC%D0%BD%20%D0%9A%D0%9D%D0%A0&path=wizard&
    amp; noreask = 1 & filmId = 7493149850001817671 &
    reqid = 1508959247292600-1442115228961280785670832-
    man1-1191-V