The authorities of Iraqi Kurdistan decided to abandon the idea of ​​independence

27
The authorities of Iraqi Kurdistan have decided to come into direct contact with official Baghdad regarding the recent events. From Erbil, there are reports that the Kurdish government is proposing to colleagues from Baghdad to stop conducting a military operation, to cease fire and sit down at the negotiating table. In exchange, the Iraqi Kurds proposed to suspend the results of the referendum held in the region.

RIA News quotes a statement from the Kurdish authorities:
To fulfill our obligations towards the people of Kurdistan and Iraq, we suggest the following Iraqi government, Iraqi and world public opinion: 1) immediate cease-fire and suspension of all military operations in Kurdistan, 2) freeze the results of the referendum held in Iraqi Kurdistan, 3) open dialogue between the Kurdistan Regional Government and the federal government of Iraq on the basis of the constitution.




The statement noted that the evolving situation could lead to a further major war, which would not reveal the winner and again plunge Iraq into endless chaos.

The authorities of Iraqi Kurdistan decided to abandon the idea of ​​independence


The judgment is sound, but it’s completely incomprehensible why they didn’t come to such conclusions in Erbil even before they called people to participate in the referendum? Now it turns out the next “Catalan” option, when the authorities of autonomy first gave people a chance to express their opinion, after which they declared the actual trade in this opinion and signed that the final result depends on the political situation and the “mood” of the elites.
27 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +11
    25 October 2017 05: 59
    In my opinion, someone stepped on Faberge .. And he came very much laughingSo it would also be with the Syrian Kurds .. But that's another story ..
    1. +1
      25 October 2017 06: 09
      So it would also be with the Syrian Kurds

      Yes ... they still have to deal with them ... the main thing is not to get involved in a war with them ... the Americans will be extremely happy about this war.
      1. +2
        25 October 2017 07: 37
        Americans are happy about any war if it is possible to make money on it and if they drown a competitor.
        The Americans are happy about the war with the Kurds if Turkey or Iran get involved in the war. Americans do not need war in Iraq right now. Iraq is completely under their control, and oil is pumping from there. But who has heard about Iraqi oil after the Gulf War? So, everything goes to the black market, and there the madmen arrived. So they held Iraqi Kurds. It was the Americans who “fabered” them.
        1. 0
          25 October 2017 07: 53
          Now we get another “Catalan” version, when the autonomy authorities first gave people a chance to express their opinion, after which they announced the actual sale of this opinion and signed that the final result depends on the political situation and the “mood” of the elites.
          the author’s absolutely stupid conclusion, having no expressed opinion of the people, there would be nothing to trade
        2. 0
          25 October 2017 09: 45
          finally, Iraq and Iraqi Kurdistan quite officially exported oil all the years after the war in the Gulf.
          Iraq is now much more controlled by Iran than by the states, which was facilitated, to put it mildly, by the stupid American policy in the region.
    2. +7
      25 October 2017 06: 41
      Quote: 210ox
      In my opinion, someone stepped on Faberge .. And he came very much laughingSo it would also be with the Syrian Kurds .. But that's another story ..

      T / e. You do not see that the second week, Iraqi troops attack the Kurds? Already more than 120 thousand people fled from the war. Yes, even the betrayal of the Talabani clan. Erbil hoped for US help, but so did evade. And the Kurds are not ready for a big war.
    3. +3
      25 October 2017 07: 58
      Half of the Kurdish army is now sitting in Sulaymaniyah and watching a movie, as the Shiites endure the Barzanists. There are few Barzanists themselves and they have problems with motivation after fleeing. More or less normally only the communists howl — but there are very few of them. Therefore, Shiites come at a brisk pace. And almost without flying, which is surprising for them. They lost only one forward column, which slipped through the designated line and rolled into the Kurds brazenly, and without support. Well, Abrashka with T-72 from Milan was burned. And the Kurdish successes have ended so far.
    4. +2
      25 October 2017 09: 26
      The Kurds have been fighting for this independence for 300 years, and if they suddenly get it, their life will lose its meaning. And so for many years you can fool the whole world.
      1. +1
        25 October 2017 09: 46
        Well, not 300, but rather 100 years.
    5. +1
      25 October 2017 11: 21
      Quote: 210ox
      In my opinion, someone stepped on Faberge ..


      The authorities of Iraqi Kurdistan decided to abandon the idea of ​​independence
      They clearly explained ...
  2. +1
    25 October 2017 06: 00
    As long as Americans dominate the BV, Kurdish separatism will harm everyone except the “hegemons”. The same applies to Syrian Kurds.
  3. +2
    25 October 2017 06: 02
    Very "flexable"!
  4. +9
    25 October 2017 06: 19
    The authorities of Iraqi Kurdistan decided to get in direct contact with official Baghdad about recent events. From Erbil, reports come that the Kurdish government is inviting colleagues from Baghdad to stop conducting a military operation, cease fire and sit down at the negotiating table. In exchange for this, Iraqi Kurds proposed to suspend the results of the referendum held in the region

    Oh, "first swallow" wink
    IMHO does not shine Kurds any "independent state".
    Yes, and it is not necessary.
    1. +4
      25 October 2017 06: 43
      Quote: Golovan Jack

      Oh, "first swallow" wink
      IMHO does not shine Kurds any "independent state".
      Yes, and it is not necessary.

      Why not? Why, for example, are Turkmens necessary and possible, but not Kurds?
      1. +9
        25 October 2017 07: 11
        Quote: Aron Zaavi
        Why, for example, are Turkmens necessary and possible, but not Kurds?

        What kind of turkmen?
        I don’t know, I don’t know ... translate into common, plz ...
        1. +5
          25 October 2017 08: 00
          and read carefully? did he indicate “Turkmen” and not “Turkmen”, or do you not know Turkmenistan? then to school))
          1. +11
            25 October 2017 09: 40
            Quote: dik-nsk
            and read carefully? he indicated "Turkmen" and not "Turkmen"

            I did not call you, and I can read. The question was to Aaron Zawi.
            Quote: dik-nsk
            or do you know Turkmenistan?

            I know. Only Turkmenistan, the glory of the Creator, has been for many, many years, it was ... yes, almost always.
            Especially in comparison with the hypothetical Kurdistan, which has never been and still is not.
            Like this ...
      2. +5
        25 October 2017 09: 31
        Why do Kurds need and can, and Palestinians, for example, cannot?

        Domestic and foreign policy environment. Even within the framework of one region, they cannot agree with 6 million people, and you say "independent state". Theoretically, they all want an “independent state,” but in practice, everyone sees in the new state as the main thing for themselves and their clan.
      3. +1
        25 October 2017 09: 48
        and Kurds can, let them fight for independence. win - get their state, and lose - then woe to the vanquished.
  5. +1
    25 October 2017 06: 44
    Oriental bazaar one word
    1. +3
      25 October 2017 06: 57
      This is not a bazaar, but a flea market lol there are different old things imposed under the guise of something new !!
  6. +2
    25 October 2017 06: 56
    The Kurdistan project has died since it was initially unviable! negative
  7. +2
    25 October 2017 07: 22
    In this particular case, bargaining is very appropriate, which means - never to be in Kurdistan, the drain began!
    1. 0
      25 October 2017 08: 16
      There is one BUT, this is Syria where there is SDF. And they grabbed quite a bit of land. They will agree with them, or how in Iraq they will take time to show weakly.
      1. +1
        25 October 2017 09: 50
        as soon as they clean the territory from the igils, they will take on the birthright. and the states will also wash their hands, they say, we did not promise anything, we only needed to defeat the caliphate.
  8. 0
    25 October 2017 10: 11
    It can be seen that the Kurds made it clear that it would be better for them.
  9. 0
    25 October 2017 11: 06
    My suspicion has developed: Psaki lurks on spare positions. As he says that he saw the coast of Kurdistan, so the Kurds will trade in shrimp, just like from Belarus. The sixth fleet of the hegemonic regime across the coast of Israel, moving Turkey, there are such options! Uh ... What? Artistic whistle, too .... Cohort of artists .... Pavlensky in a mental hospital, however. No! We must go the other way! Yes! Someone already said that .... Read the classics again.