And if Putin leaves? Operation "Successor" is likely, logical, possible!

243


Today in Russian political circles there are few who doubt that Vladimir Putin will be nominated by the party "United Russia" for the fourth presidential term. Or he will nominate himself and become the president of Russia for the fourth time. And I propose to speculate: what if the protracted pause with the nomination of a candidate from the party of power is nothing but an attempt to play another “game”? Putin is leaving to come back again. By the way, in this version of the logic even more than in the fourth presidential term in 2018 ...



As we remember, during the last presidential campaign, intrigue left very early. Already at the end of September 2011, the congress of United Russia put forward at the time Prime Minister Vladimir Putin for a third presidential term.

Today is the end of October, and the Kremlin’s decision is gone. Vladimir Putin’s speeches on the margins of the Valdai Discussion Club were awaited for many reasons. Many expected that it was here that the current president of Russia would remove the intrigue about nominating him for a new presidential term, which would immediately become the beginning and the actual end of the election race.



But Vladimir Putin with a smile left the answer and did not even give any hint of what decision he made for himself and the country.

Elections are to be held 18 March 2018 of the year. The Federation Council must decide on the appointment of the presidential election of the Russian Federation no earlier than 100 days and no later than 90 days before that date, after which only 20 days will remain for the official nomination of candidates. It turns out that the decision of the Federation Council will follow between 8 and 18 December 2017 of the year, and the congress of United Russia is tentatively announced for the second decade of December, which pushes the intrigue of the pro-government nomination to the deadline.

Why did the Kremlin decide to keep the intrigue to the last? I would venture to suggest that today the “Successor” scenario is being considered at the top, which allows solving a lot of future problems for the country and for President Putin personally.

Life after Putin

As we understand, Vladimir Putin cannot rule the country forever. Sooner or later he will have to leave, and in Russia the question will arise: what to do next? It is clear that to live, but how? Over the past almost 20 years, everyone has become accustomed to, that Russia has a pivot that can do everything, knows everything, has 20 tricky plans for all occasions, etc.

So easy to live, but until such time as this rod is. And when does it disappear? If the country is ready for this and the mechanism for the actual transfer of power (with the name of the successor) is already developed within the elites, then this change will take place without serious consequences and will not cause the country major problems. This is exactly what every permanent leader of the country who is well aware of the complexity of this transitional moment should be concerned about.

It was then that his many years of work are most at risk, and the duty of any leader is to provide his country with controllability and stability at this crucial moment.

Of course, Vladimir Putin cannot help but attend to this issue. And a very convenient time to begin preparing Russia for this event (albeit remote) may be the presidential election of 2018 of the year.

Little arithmetic

And if Putin leaves? Operation "Successor" is likely, logical, possible!


The other day, Vladimir Putin turned 65 years. If you go for another term, then in 71 he will leave the presidency, and everyone will understand that this is forever. So, the maximum in 2023 year in the country inside the elite can begin a real palace war, in which the victor may not be. After all, the enemy does not sleep and will try to use any reason to shake Russia from the inside. And just this option today seems the most promising for them.

If Vladimir Putin is leaving now (again as prime minister), firstly, you can run into the successor, and secondly, in which case there will be a possibility of return, during which the error can be corrected, or, on the contrary, approved the successor will begin to get ready to take matters really.

Thus, theoretically, Vladimir Putin has remained at the helm of Russia for years on 12, which allows him without haste and maximally eliminating the possibility of an error to solve the problem of the successor of his business.

Transitional Problem Solving

This option also makes it possible to quite elegantly and beautifully solve another problem of the Russian authorities. Recent years have clearly shown that Dmitry Medvedev is no good for the role of successor (perhaps never considered). But it is also clear that he is a figure who represents a part of the current Russian elites and is part of some intra-elite agreements. Just to remove him from the post of prime minister means to violate these agreements, which threatens the country with problems.



If the post of prime minister needs to be released under Vladimir Putin, no one will have any questions, and thus it will be possible to try to solve another “problem” of Russia: what to do with the country's third president, who, not being the successor, can then be used to creating lines of division within the Russian elite. And as events of the last decades show, such splits are the most dangerous for the state.

There is a readiness

If you take a closer look, then the Kremlin is ready for Operation Successor. The opposition is marginalized, the state machine is adjusted and every year it works more and more clearly, allowing the “successor” to work in the first years in the mode of maximum comfort. And if any problems arise, Vladimir Putin will be there and be able to solve them.

By the way, considering the option "Successor", you can answer the question asked at the beginning of the article: why Putin is so slow? That's why: the less time left after the nomination, the less the enemy will have time to destroy the applicant's original positive image. By this time, all the programs of the candidates and their struggle tactics will be developed, and there will be no time to rebuild it at the end of December under the new and so far unknown enemy. This will allow the successor to enter into power with a minimal initial negative image and thereby reduce his problems in the future.

In general, while events and logic say that the operation “Successor” in Russia in 2018, is by no means excluded, but on the contrary, is more likely than ever.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

243 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +27
    24 October 2017 05: 51
    But do we not tell fortunes on coffee grounds, who has nothing to do?
    1. +6
      24 October 2017 06: 15
      By the stars, by the palm, by the insides of the sacrificial animals!
      1. +6
        24 October 2017 08: 16
        Let Putin be! To finish the unfinished, to raise Russia!
        And not some secret receiver. The receiver will be mistaken, and Putin will correct. But you can do it so hard that you can’t fix it!
        1. +71
          24 October 2017 08: 35
          Quote: Reptiloid
          Let Putin be! To finish the unfinished, to raise Russia!

          Maybe enough to finish building already? And, after all, for 18 years everything has been completed - it cannot be completed. Instead of the expected improvement in the life of the people, they want to make new taxes, raise excise taxes, increase pension experience ... And three years ago, that’s how a people’s robbery happened! Halved salaries with savings twice, and even for this no one was held responsible! Is this civilized growth?
          1. +24
            24 October 2017 09: 01
            Well, yes, yes ... one more Yeltsin-Medvedev is needed. Democrat. This one will definitely raise the standard of living. One wave of the hand. And salaries will increase and civilized growth will provide. Of course, our overseas friends will immediately lift the sanctions, fill up all the budgets of the Russian Federation with investments - read, they will destroy again what has been “restored” in 20 years, and again, the gold reserves will be transferred to American bins “for storage”.
            Urya! The triumph of democracy will come
            1. +41
              24 October 2017 09: 43
              Quote: Vlad.by
              Well, yes, yes ... one more Yeltsin-Medvedev is needed. Democrat.

              So you yourself answered the question! We don’t need a democrat like Yeltsin and Medvedev! And Putin is just from this visual range. Pure liberal! Therefore, we need another president, socially oriented, against disorder and oligarchs, one that will make Russia strong. And the money will be withdrawn from America, and the ruble will be untied from the dollar. It will cease to drive all raw materials to the west, and the proceeds of money - offshore. ... The list goes on for a very long time!
              Yes, I would even agree to the collective farmer Lukashenko! He is more honest with the people. There is no such rampant oligarchs! Economic...
              1. +22
                24 October 2017 10: 02
                ... and then Ostap suffered ...
                Quote: Stas157
                ... we need another president, socially oriented, against the mess and the oligarchs, one that will make Russia strong. And the money will be withdrawn from America, and the ruble will be untied from the dollar. It will cease to drive all raw materials to the west, and the proceeds of money - offshore.

                1. +25
                  24 October 2017 10: 06
                  Quote: Golovan Jack
                  ... and then Ostap suffered ...

                  You, as always, have unsurpassed argumentation!
                  1. +15
                    24 October 2017 10: 59
                    Quote: Stas157
                    You, as always, have unsurpassed argumentation!

                    You don’t have it as a class.
                    What I, in fact, pointed out.
              2. +23
                24 October 2017 10: 51
                A socially oriented president? what is it like? Do you understand that raising salaries by increasing the salaries themselves is a way to nowhere ?! Incomes of the population grow from the growth of the economy, the economy grows with the growth of industry, the development of technology, stable trade, and this all grows when you have established relations with the whole world, when there are clear agreements and each side is responsible. And how do you ask from the side that violates the contract? Call to common sense or send a note of protest from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs? Nonsense is complete, they wipe the ass with such notes. Need a powerful "fist". the "lamp" of democracy does not just have the most powerful armed forces in the world. But it’s not only tanks and planes, ships and submarines, it’s also a network of “threads”, for which you must pull at the right time. And this is called "big politics." And being a master in it, while not having huge military budgets, is an extremely difficult matter.
                But father spins around in his sandbox, plays his own way, but he can always rely on the support of the Kremlin: do you need a couple of loans with a lard (which will then be written off)? - that receive on health. Need gas at cost? pffff .... easy.
                The main thing is not chudy and do not flirt with the West.
                I am amazed by people like you, Stas, who see the world so simple. Such a type came to the Kremlin, sat on the "throne" and bam .... all RFP immediately raised 2 times. and inflation is such a bang and has grown 5 times, because everything is interconnected: I got a cork from a hole, plugged another hole, and flowed in its original place. and oh God .... 17 years already ... already 17 fucking years and nothing happens. The whole world advises us the best way, they "invest" in the evolution (revolution) of the state, and we all do not draw conclusions in any way uncouth. 17 years ... oh my god .... how long .... and the country is just a little more than Luxembourg ... but for 17 years it can’t be lifted from its knees, especially with the support of the WHOLE fucking world and all the “partners” . I would put Stas157 as president !!!!!
                1. +2
                  24 October 2017 12: 30
                  But father spins around in his sandbox, plays his own way, but he can always rely on the support of the Kremlin: do you need a couple of loans with a lard (which will then be written off)? - that receive on health. Need gas at cost? pffff .... easy.
                  The main thing is not chudy and do not flirt with the West.


                  And how many of us, “a country a little more than Luxembourg” were written off? Gas "at cost", and how much is it today and when was it?

                  We are talking about “equally profitable prices” today (explain what is this?) And my aunt in the Samara province complains every year that the gas with which she heats her tomato greenhouse is getting more expensive and more expensive .. Miller and they want to plant all of Russia at world prices, what here, then, at cost?

                  Remember, any fervor that we received for less than 30 years of “non-independence” under preferential terms was tied either to the specific interests of specific individuals in the Russian fuel and energy complex or (at first) to finance individuals in the Russian Government or individual parties in the Russian Duma. yes at customs offshore
                  For many years Belarus was a kind of exhibition picture for the Russians - “you guys will tolerate, and we will have the same nourishing, colored, trimmed, seeded and clean, without democracy and breakthrough development”

                  Well, there is still a certain price for a very convenient military bridgehead that covers the whole of northern Europe .. This is what the LAS says: “We’ll lay our bones here but don’t miss the NATO tanks in Moscow.” But judging by its public “multi-vector structure” - we pay this fee loyalty. no longer hapae! hi
                  1. +1
                    26 October 2017 14: 58
                    Oleg Tolstoy October 24, 2017
                    I still did not understand what they wanted to say?
                    What does Russia follow its own interests in preferential deliveries? Or, again, about the fact that in Russia everyone is stealing?
                    Incidentally, from the point of view of the "bridgehead covering Northern Europe" - so it is more like a bone in the throat, not a bridgehead. Don’t place a base, don’t put Iskanders with Russian crews ... But there is no faith in the fact that someone from Lukashenko’s team in dugouts will lie under NATO tanks - sorry.
                    National Belarusian idea - give more money, but for free!
                2. +23
                  24 October 2017 12: 37
                  Quote: silver_roman
                  Socially oriented president? what is it like? Do you understand that raising salaries by increasing the salaries themselves is a way to nowhere ?! Household income grows from economic growth

                  No salary money?
                  There is simply no money: Russian billionaires got rich at $ 104 billion per year.
                  According to Forbes, 96 Russians included in the list of dollar billionaires got rich in $ 2016 billion in 104, and their combined fortune reached $ 386 billion and for the first time exceeded the Central Bank's foreign exchange reserves ($ 377,7 billion as of January 1). ... At the same time, the rest of the population was impoverished by almost the same amount.
                  Arkady Rotenberg more than doubled his fortune - from $ 1 to $ 2,6 billion. More than two! Let me remind you that Rotenberg makes money on government orders!
                  So is there really no money in Russia? Or is it just for the people?
                  By the way, all three of Putin’s friends, the billionaires - Timchenko, Rotenberg and Kovalchuk - were subject to EU and US sanctions, and therefore the State Duma decided to exempt them from paying taxes in Russia.
                  1. +8
                    24 October 2017 16: 39
                    Quote: Stas157
                    Arkady Rotenberg more than doubled his fortune - from $ 1 to $ 2,6 billion. More than two! Let me remind you that Rotenberg makes money on government orders!
                    By the way, all three of Putin’s friends, the millionaires Timchenko, Rotenberg and Kovalchuk

                    And again, we see Mr. Stas157's subtle lie. After all, he advocates here only for changing the president to "honest and fair," and not at all for changing the system. As if not understanding that all these Rotenbergs are a direct result of the existing system, and a change of president will only change some Rotenbergs at the trough for others, which, by the way, the same Maidan perfectly demonstrated. But it’s only the smart ones who learn from the mistakes of others, and Mr. Stas157 doesn’t consider us to be such, so he urges us to jump on the rake. Have fun, damn it.
                    So is there really no money in Russia? Or is it just for the people?
                    And you want to say that in the case of the election of a "different" president, Rotenberg and Co. will immediately distribute everything to the people? laughing
                  2. +2
                    24 October 2017 16: 56
                    Quote: Stas157
                    Arkady Rotenberg more than doubled his fortune - from $ 1 to $ 2,6 billion. More than two! Let me remind you that Rotenberg makes money on government orders!
                    So is there really no money in Russia? Or is it just for the people?
                    By the way, all three of Putin’s friends, the billionaires - Timchenko, Rotenberg and Kovalchuk - were subject to EU and US sanctions, and therefore the State Duma decided to exempt them from paying taxes in Russia.

                    Take and share?
                    Correctly!!! And then there is some kind of congress, Germans, economy, inflation ...
                  3. 0
                    25 October 2017 07: 17
                    Why are you talking nonsense about friends. But it's stupid. And another will come. Then you and his friends will find.
                3. 0
                  24 October 2017 16: 43
                  Quote: silver_roman
                  Such a type came to the Kremlin, sat on the "throne" and bam ..

                  The film is, "Servant of the people" is called. I recommend to see. wink
                4. +12
                  24 October 2017 16: 51
                  Quote: silver_roman
                  I am amazed by people like you, Stas, who see the world so simple. Such a type came to the Kremlin, sat on the "throne" and bam .... all RFP immediately raised 2 times.

                  Well, this is the first problem in Russia described by the classic - Fools! And there’s no escape from them. They all dream that the good Tsar will come and decide everything))) The kindergarten that has not passed for centuries ...
                  Quote: silver_roman
                  17 years already ... already 17 fucking years and nothing happens.

                  Apparently the patient is young and does not remember the first half of the 90s ...
                  Quote: silver_roman
                  and the country is just a little more than Luxembourg ... but for 17 years it hasn’t been lifted from its knees, especially with the support of the WHOLE fucking world and all the “partners”. I would put Stas157 as president !!!!!

                  Well, for the sake of justice, you can remember what for such a period, under similar external conditions and for many worse starting points, Joseph Vissarionovich reached ...
                  April 3, 1922 - A country in ruin after a civil war and foreign intervention, surrounded by enemies, agrarian, illiterate, hungry, impoverished, on the verge of destruction ...
                  +17 years old
                  1939 year. An industrial power, with a completely literate population, free education, having a private economic sector (industrial cooperation, artels, etc.), showing global ambitions, guaranteeing internal stability (Trotskyists (white-winged dogs) cut down the forest, and conditional "Serdyukovs" are periodically shot )
                  And as a result, when the next redistribution of the World began (just in 1939), the Country emerged from it as one of two centers of power! And this alignment lasted until our time !!!
                  So much can be done in 17 years.
                  1. +2
                    24 October 2017 19: 48
                    Quote: AllXVahhaB
                    So much can be done in 17 years.

                    Can. But did Stalin die and? Fast is not always good - the problem is that you need to create a country-oriented elite, without which everything else is useless.
                    1. +7
                      24 October 2017 20: 09
                      Quote: Dart2027
                      Can. But did Stalin die and? Fast is not always good - the problem is that you need to create a country-oriented elite, without which everything else is useless.

                      I agree. Problems of a strong personality ... It was worth the death of Ivan IV and ... Peter I and ... Alexander III and ...
                      And the "nationally oriented elite" is not a panacea today. There was such an elite in the USA, so what? Today they are cosmopolitan, citizens of the world. They do not care what happens in Detroit and how the average American lives. More profitable to transfer production to Asia? They will also transfer FSUs to unemployment in the country. Is it more profitable to conduct cash flows through offshore? Spend! The Fed only by the name "federal", in fact it is a private shop! This is the world purebred!!! Capital has no homeland, no its country. They stick to the USA only because they created the largest club there. There will be benefits and opportunities - they will transfer everything to another place. And FSUs on the territory and population ...
                      So the country-oriented elite is a chimera! Under capitalism, this does not exist in nature!
                      1. 0
                        24 October 2017 21: 13
                        Quote: AllXVahhaB
                        Under capitalism, this does not exist in nature!

                        And where does it exist? People are people. As for the United States, I doubt that all the rich there are elite.
                      2. 0
                        25 October 2017 08: 37
                        I am well aware that it’s painful and difficult to think about such more important things, but only in passing will I try to “push everything in this direction”:
                        And how many more millennia according to your people should bite over shreds of territories, swear at the fact that “he is an Arab, not Russian” or “Negroes, I hate them more than Latinos”? Why should one cling to such atavisms as the "uniqueness of an ethnos"? But why the heck is this necessary? We have, by the way, the whole solar system idle! But with this, if we don’t erase all the boundaries to hell, there will be problems - in the not so distant future, we, developers of advanced systems (modern engineers), will achieve that after all someone will be able to rush and "capture the moon" / " Mars". They will take and declare their territory (what they will do there is another question ... stupidly staked out). Will it benefit us, the inhabitants of the Earth? Does this add friction?
                        We must move away from the concept of "my state." It’s time to stop being a child and still consider the whole Earth to be your home - then the attitude will change to the planet as a whole (otherwise I already saw the wildest nonsense about the same Grand Canyon that it’s crap ... and only because that he is in the USA. This is the brightest "pan-head"). And yes, the fate of all mankind is more important than those who could not adapt (I'm talking about Detroit) - there have always been / will be those who have to crawl to the bottom / cemetery at all times. First of all, you have to be honest with yourself. This is the natural selection and evolution of society.

                        In short, all this (similar to your calls) looks like the desire to “not change anything” / “to preserve the current state of affairs forever and ever”. Just one-on-one, like the United States you hate. They also dream of a "end of story."
                    2. +1
                      27 October 2017 09: 50
                      Quote: Dart2027
                      Quote: AllXVahhaB
                      So much can be done in 17 years.

                      Can. But did Stalin die and? Fast is not always good - the problem is that you need to create a country-oriented elite, without which everything else is useless.

                      And what happened after the death of Stalin? Well, they cried and continued to build the Great Country. Cities are still 50% "Khrushchev" built up, especially outside the Moscow Ring Road. A little later, the Americans did the atomic bomb than frustrated the plans for bombing Soviet cities. The first satellite, the first astronaut, the first orbital station is all the USSR. And they didn’t forget about the people "there was a time and prices were reduced" was sung in the song.
                      It’s just that Stalin was not afraid to surround himself, albeit not with geniuses, but not with gray mice as now.
                      1. The comment was deleted.
                      2. +1
                        27 October 2017 18: 31
                        Quote: E_V_N
                        And what happened after the death of Stalin? Well, they cried and continued to build the Great Country.

                        At the head of which stood the top aimed at the collapse of this country in order to warm hands on it. And so all the achievements in science and technology no longer mattered.
              3. +3
                24 October 2017 14: 19
                Quote: Stas157
                I’d even agree to the collective farmer Lukashenko!

                Such as Lukashenko are not quite optimal for working in the international arena. Even if he is a good business executive. Like Lukash, his counterpart will look west in the absence of his opinion and development vector. Alas.

                Quote: Stas157
                Putin is just from this visual range.

                The visual row is one thing, but the fact that it is not one of them “for business” is quite another.

                Here you have the Medvedev, Kudrinsky and Grefovsky vectors:
                Medvedev announced the continuation of privatization -
                https://lenta.ru/news/2017/02/28/medvedev/
                http://static.government.ru/media/files/fdupS1yex
                AVoMGfevOqCs4QzAEeMjYtE.pdf (signed by Medvedev)
                Kudrin said the need to privatize the oil sector -
                http://www.rbc.ru/economics/01/06/2017/592fb86b9a
                794723b7dff1d6
                Gref called privatization a national security issue for Russia -
                http://www.ntv.ru/novosti/1792238/
                ------------
                And here is the Putin vector -
                http://jourdom.ru/news/11464
                (Putin spoke out against the privatization of state-owned television channels)
                https://www.ridus.ru/news/211314.html
                (With possible privatization - transparency, controlling stakes, buyer under the jurisdiction of the Russian Federation)
                https://iz.ru/613571/2017-07-01/putin-podpisal-za
                kon-o-zaprete-ofshoram-privatizirovat-gosimushche
                stvo
                (Suppression of the participation of clearly criminal structures)

                PS: That is, flies should be distinguished from cutlets, grains from chaffs, Gaidar unfortunate reformers from cautious, but aboutstate functionaries.
              4. +4
                24 October 2017 16: 28
                Quote: Stas157
                we need a different president, socially oriented, against disorder and oligarchs, one that will make Russia strong. And the money will be withdrawn from America, and the ruble will be untied from the dollar. It will cease to drive all raw materials to the west, and the proceeds of money - offshore. ... The list goes on for a very long time!

                No need to continue, just give a specific surname and everything will immediately become clear to everyone what motive you sing. To criticize and get off with beautiful but general phrases is all great, and you specifically poke a finger and say - this person will do better for this reason and that. However, this is not your task, right? Your task is to groan and criticize.
                1. 0
                  27 October 2017 10: 50
                  Quote: Abracadabrus
                  just give a specific surname and everything will immediately become clear to everyone what motive you sing. To criticize and get off with beautiful but general phrases is all great, and you specifically poke a finger

                  I like Shoigu, no matter what section they put on, good results are everywhere, that in the Ministry of Emergencies, that in the Sun
              5. +5
                24 October 2017 16: 32
                Quote: Stas157
                and the ruble will be untied from the dollar.

                How? Iron curtain?
                Quote: Stas157
                Will cease to drive all raw materials to the west

                And where to drive them? To the East? Or how does King Kashchei wither over gold? There is no domestic consumption ...
                Quote: Stas157
                and the proceeds are offshore.

                Is it the President who is driving?
                Quote: Stas157
                Yes, I would even agree to the collective farmer Lukashenko! He is more honest with the people. There is no such rampant oligarchs! Economic...

                We already had such an economic collective farmer. Gorbachev is his last name. Remember how it ended? Belarus and Lukashenko exist only thanks to Russia.
              6. +3
                25 October 2017 01: 38
                Quote: Stas157
                Quote: Vlad.by
                Well, yes, yes ... one more Yeltsin-Medvedev is needed. Democrat.

                So you yourself answered the question! We don’t need a democrat like Yeltsin and Medvedev! And Putin is just from this visual range. Pure liberal! Therefore, we need another president, socially oriented, against disorder and oligarchs, one that will make Russia strong. And the money will be withdrawn from America, and the ruble will be untied from the dollar. It will cease to drive all raw materials to the west, and the proceeds of money - offshore. ... The list goes on for a very long time!
                Yes, I would even agree to the collective farmer Lukashenko! He is more honest with the people. There is no such rampant oligarchs! Economic...

                1) how to untie the ruble from the dollar? Technically
                2) what do oligarchs personally bother you with?
                3) why, besides oil and gas, will Russia currently receive money for social programs?

                Set of populist chants.
                1. 0
                  27 October 2017 11: 03
                  Quote: Krasnodar
                  1) how to untie the ruble from the dollar? Technically
                  2) what do oligarchs personally bother you with?
                  3) why, besides oil and gas, will Russia currently receive money for social programs?
                  Set of populist chants.


                  1. In order to untie the ruble from the dollar, it is necessary to produce consumer goods and means of production within the country, and not to buy everything over the hill. In the USSR, no one was interested in the dollar exchange rate and the price of oil, how do you think why?
                  2. I personally get in the way, they charge me taxes, and the oligarchs drag this money out of the budget through offshore in their pockets. Money earned in the Russian Federation is not spent on economic recovery, but on the purchase of sports clubs, yachts and estates over the hill.
                  3. Do you really think that money from oil and gas goes to social programs? do you get a salary or a pension in dollars? Indeed, dollars are received for oil and gas.

                  IMHO, but the chatter and distortion in your questions.
              7. +2
                25 October 2017 07: 14
                It is easy to lead the country here on the site sitting at the computer. And who is better. Who?. For whom you can vouch. Who will come and be honest and will lead new oligarchs of his own. You think it's so simple to take and withdraw all the money .. and stop driving the raw materials. And in offshore, everyone has money from both ours and Western businessmen.
                1. +1
                  25 October 2017 21: 57
                  How could Russia live without Putin ?! I’m ready to vouch for Grudinin P., Boldyrev Yu., Strelkova I., Artamonov, enough Savchenko?
                  1. +1
                    26 October 2017 14: 36
                    For P. Grudinin, Yu. Boldyrev, I. Strelkov, Artamonov, Savchenko

                    Excuse me, what are these personalities famous for? Do they have experience in removing from the devastation of the 90s at least a n / a such as the village of Gadiukino in New Vasyuki?
                    Only not in paper criticism, but in real Russian open spaces.
                    1. +1
                      26 October 2017 20: 09
                      Grudinin is known as the chairman of the famous collective farm named after Lenin, Artamonov and Savchenko, the governors, if you do not know them, this does not mean that there is no one except Putin.
                      1. +1
                        26 October 2017 21: 36
                        I do not advise you. Personally to you. And also - I am Russian, and the fact that I do not live in Russia does not cancel my love for the Motherland. So relax. Your opinion does not interest me and does not even bother me
              8. +2
                26 October 2017 11: 14
                Yes, I would even agree to the collective farmer Lukashenko! He is more honest with the people. There is no such rampant oligarchs! Economic...

                And would you, dear, come to Belarus at least for a couple of months to evaluate the "economy" not from the pictures on TV, you would quickly correct your comment. It is dangerous to confuse real life with commercials.
              9. +1
                26 October 2017 14: 31
                Would you agree to Lukashenko ??? Sure, not a problem! Let's change passports ...
                Only then do not whine that he has a socially oriented economy of another system!
            2. +6
              24 October 2017 10: 20
              Witnesses sect 90 pulled itself up, they are more afraid of them than the Antichrist and wake up with a cold sweat every morning)
              1. +5
                24 October 2017 14: 58
                Quote: spirit
                Witnesses sect 90 pulled itself up, they are more afraid of them than the Antichrist and wake up with a cold sweat every morning)

                Yes, actually nothing good happened at that time, nothing at all.
                The second time we’ll not survive this.
                1. +3
                  24 October 2017 15: 58
                  Yes, actually nothing good happened at that time, nothing at all
                  At that time, they shared the country. Now divided, but suddenly the sanctions and began to sell the country. And if Putin suddenly really wants to sit still, he will regret such a decision. because all these years the country has been living off oil, and now Putin’s hysteria has begun to hate that electric cars are unprofitable. Only the world will soon switch to new technology and the Sechins-Zubkovs will remain at their trough.
                  1. +3
                    24 October 2017 16: 11
                    Quote: Gardamir
                    At that time, they shared the country. Now divided, but suddenly the sanctions and began to sell the country.

                    Everything was already sold in the 90s, mainly in the form of scrap metal, in order to sell what was left, another 90s were needed.
                    And if Putin suddenly really wants to sit still

                    Yes, I think I’ll sit a couple of terms in the presidential chair, age is not an obstacle - Trump won the president at 71.
                    he will regret such a decision.

                    Well, if not him, then someone else will regret it - I see no difference.
                    that electric cars are disadvantageous

                    Of course unprofitable. Burning fuel, getting electricity through it, passing this electricity to the consumer with losses is much more expensive than just burning fuel.
                    In addition, the charging issue raises sharply, it is that in Europe the towns are poked already there is nowhere to spit, something is more complicated with us, and you can’t pour electricity into the canister.
                    1. +4
                      24 October 2017 17: 32
                      to sell what is left
                      We heard about the sale of part of Rosneft's shares to Qatar. Yes, and I repeat why they are driving dollars to America. But money is needed for the development of the country.
                      What does age have to do with it? Circumstances change.
                      Burning fuel, getting electricity through it, passing this electricity to the consumer with losses is much more expensive than just burning fuel.
                      And what is so difficult? Even in Russia there are solar-powered lights. If you do not go into details, then you need to develop science and production of the future, which is about to come today. But Putin is not given to see this; he thinks in terms of kudrinomiki.
                      1. +3
                        24 October 2017 17: 48
                        Quote: Gardamir
                        on the sale of part of Rosneft's shares to Qatar

                        They bought shares from one of the holders, and not all. From a controlling stake in the state-owned, they did not buy a single one.
                        At the same time, Rosneft buys the second largest refinery in India - HINDERS SOLD OUT THEIR COUNTRY FOR FOREIGNERS !!! wassat

                        Quote: Gardamir
                        And what is so difficult? Even in Russia there are solar-powered lights. If

                        To solar panels, in winter, a specially trained person with a shovel should be attached and someone else needs to disperse the clouds.
                        And that batteries, that windmills, cannot provide stable generation.
                      2. +3
                        25 October 2017 05: 28
                        Just one “BUT” - for the use of solar panels in transport there will not be enough sunny days; we are still not a very southern country.
                      3. +1
                        28 October 2017 13: 16
                        Gardamir October 24, 2017 21:32 Even in Russia there are solar-powered lights.

                        They put it where it is not profitable to draw a line. Solar electricity costs 3-4 times more expensive than usual.
                  2. +1
                    24 October 2017 16: 16
                    Well, the gardamir knows what the Russian woman needs. And most importantly, who is not needed.
                    Run over here, detractors ...
                    Where have you been before?
                    1. The comment was deleted.
                  3. 0
                    24 October 2017 17: 03
                    Quote: Gardamir
                    all these years the country lived off oil, and now Putin’s hysteria has begun to hate that electric cars are not profitable, only the world will soon move to new technology

                    So what? Oil without cars and thermal power plants will remain the most liquid commodity! Remember what Mendeleev said about the use of oil as fuel. And since then, technology has stepped far ahead in terms of oil use!
                    1. +1
                      24 October 2017 17: 36
                      Oil without cars and thermal power plants will remain the most liquid commodity!
                      Once salt was equal to gold, once aluminum was equal to jewelry ...
                2. 0
                  24 October 2017 16: 54
                  I agree. I didn’t know how they survived. Finally the pipe was.
              2. 0
                24 October 2017 19: 49
                Quote: spirit
                Sect of witnesses 90 pulled up

                And then you lay in the cradle?
          2. +21
            24 October 2017 09: 46
            Well, yes, now another President will come .... and everything will be settled right away, pensions will become European, global salaries, health care at the level of .... only GDP does not allow all of this to rise, so do you think ??? Enough of this nonsense, have passed.
            1. +25
              24 October 2017 09: 59
              Quote: Alexey-74
              ... and everything will work out right away, pensions will become European, global salaries, healthcare at the level of ....

              You throw these Maidan chants! Justice is primarily needed in society. A fair trial! Governors and ministers are not corrupt, nor are thieves. Truly free education and medicine. Social elevators, not nepotism! Fair redistribution of the final product - labor.
              Or do you think that all this is not necessary? Will we put up with this just to keep the illusion of stability?
              1. +18
                24 October 2017 10: 18
                As the saying goes - in the bullseye! The weakest link, or rather not the link, but almost traitors, the so-called "elite". These are "managers", "officials", and other, other, other, that have lost their shores. They are at ANY moment, for dollars or simply for the inviolability of "their" money in Western accounts, they will surrender their homeland. They, as usual, will still be deceived, but it will be too late. All these #navalny Hitler, just whipping boys, and the main traitors are precisely the "elite".
                1. +6
                  24 October 2017 12: 27
                  And the elite, governors, officials, are they Martians? They are from our own people and where can they come from, some honest ones are not very good, and the third thieves are the same people, the people are different people. So here you don’t need to talk about the elite, now the children of the 70s rampant bureaucracy and corruption are becoming the elite, let's see what heap up. The overlook should be tough and adequate, and the dictatorship of the law, then you look in an easier way everything will work.
                2. The comment was deleted.
                  1. +3
                    24 October 2017 17: 41
                    In their hearts they dream of getting out of the "fucking ... rushka" even more than liberalists !!!
                    Well, you really got it. The point is not ideology, but the ability to eat, even if the crack is cracked.
              2. +7
                24 October 2017 10: 56
                You are right indeed, it is necessary to change. But to remove one and put another judge is not an option. It is necessary to change the institutions of power. But try to carry out the reform now, the articles immediately go: “democracy is in danger, the dictator has infringed on the rights of the people”, etc. It’s not going to cut off the shoulder. If we were one country on the planet, then please. I would have started to shoot for embezzlement in especially large ones, but what will happen, you understand yourself !!!!
                1. +8
                  24 October 2017 12: 20
                  Quote: silver_roman
                  You are right indeed, it is necessary to change. But to remove one and put another judge is not an option.
                  The Kremlin can always make a knight's move. For the presidency - Shoigu (for example), for the premieres - of Putin, with the transfer of certain functions to the prime minister. And you think someone will blather? So, jokes will poison. Maximum. Liberals are crying, of course, but who will worry about them?
                2. +2
                  24 October 2017 17: 18
                  Quote: silver_roman
                  but what will happen, you understand yourself !!!!

                  What will happen? In China, they shoot every year, and somehow nothing ...
              3. The comment was deleted.
              4. +1
                24 October 2017 16: 21
                You throw these Maidan chants!
                said Stas157 and immediately put forward precisely those slogans that chanted pan-and-panheads on the Maidan:
                A fair trial! Governors and ministers are not corrupt, nor are thieves. Truly free education and medicine. Social elevators, not nepotism!
                One would like to ask this Mr.: are you inadequate yourself or do you keep readers for fools?
                1. +9
                  24 October 2017 18: 09
                  Quote: Abracadabrus
                  One would like to ask this Mr.: are you inadequate yourself or do you keep readers for fools?

                  Only you!
                  Quote: Abracadabrus
                  said Stas157 and immediately put forward precisely those slogans that chanted pan-and-panheads on the Maidan:

                  I did not understand the meaning of your accusation. If something coincides with what was required on the Maidan, does it immediately become wrong? Hey cuckoo! Are we now every word that shouted on the Maidan will be verified ?? Can you object to anything intelligible?
                  1. 0
                    24 October 2017 19: 51
                    Quote: Stas157
                    so it immediately becomes wrong

                    Well, suggest how to implement this. Practically, not in the form of slogans.
              5. 0
                24 October 2017 16: 55
                What you wrote is cool, but not about our country.
              6. +2
                24 October 2017 17: 07
                Quote: Stas157
                You throw these Maidan chants! Justice is primarily needed in society. A fair trial! Governors and ministers are not corrupt, nor are thieves. Truly free education and medicine. Social elevators, not nepotism! Fair redistribution of the final product - labor.

                I-gru: Stalin is in need !!! Thief first secretaries of the regional committee of all shot! No corruption! Truly free medicine and education! Social elevators already flew: today you are flying, and after half a year - a divisor! And no nepotism - all the godparents in Magadan)))
              7. 0
                25 October 2017 07: 23
                You personally, you are ready to prove that there are thieves. You have facts and evidence, or we will plant only on the basis of your words. Why write nonsense. That the roar of the three will revive. Just for starters, you yourself honest. Or do not know about the presumption of innocence.
            2. +1
              24 October 2017 10: 23
              And you are not alone in Russia, and some people with complicated brains have a different opinion
            3. 0
              24 October 2017 15: 59
              passed already.
              when in the 70s?
            4. 0
              26 October 2017 13: 05
              Alexey-74 October 24, 2017 09:46 ↑
              Well, yes, now another President will come .... and everything will be settled right away, pensions will become European, global salaries, health care at the level of .... only GDP does not allow all of this to rise, so do you think ??? Enough of this nonsense, have passed.

              As I understand it, Serdyukov and Vasiliev were nonsense? Medvedev - “no money”, Nanotolik and “heroic academician” - a mirage? Here's a fresher:
              Russian Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev instructed the Ministry of Finance to nominate the former head of the FCS Andrei Belyaninov to be appointed chairman of the board of the Eurasian Development Bank (EDB). The order is published on the legal information portal.
              A spokesman for the Russian president Dmitry Peskov said that the scandals associated with the name of Belyaninov did not discredit his old and new position, a RBC correspondent reports. “What is shown on television is bad, the president himself expressed a negative attitude. He said that investigative actions should not be turned into a show. But Mr. Belyaninov never was accused of anything and therefore I consider such a question inappropriate, ”said Peskov.
              In July 2016, Belyaninov resigned from his post as head of the FCS - after investigators involved in the case of alcohol smuggling found 9,5 million rubles, $ 390 thousand and € 350 thousand at his home. Belyaninov himself said then that the money he found is private savings. On July 28, Medvedev signed an order to dismiss Belyaninov from the post of head of the FCS and to appoint Vladimir Bulavin to this post.
              As RNS wrote in August 2016, citing its sources, Belyaninov was already considered as a candidate for the post of head of the EDB.
              After resigning, the ex-head of the FCS said he hopes to continue working in the civil service. In February 2017, he confirmed his intentions. “I will work where the president puts, I can do everything - I can wash the toilets, I can be the governor. I’m a servant, I’ve been serving the state all my life and, as you understood from the newspapers, I’m not very poor, everything is fine with me, ”Belyaninov claimed
              During the “big press conference” in December 2016, Russian President Vladimir Putin said that there were no complaints against Belyaninov, since no case had been brought against him. “All sorts of pre-investigative actions, including searches and something similar, were thrown into the media, I consider unacceptable. They damage the business and simply personal reputation of any person, ”the head of state said.
              On the same day, it became known that the Investigative Committee returned to Belyaninov the money and valuables seized during the search in the amount of about 100 million rubles.
              Read more at RBC:
              http://www.rbc.ru/society/25/10/2017/59f04e329a79
              47056985a22a? from = main

              Is it not enough to rearrange beds in this brothel?
            5. 0
              27 October 2017 11: 20
              Quote: Alexey-74
              Well, yes, now another President will come .... and everything will be settled right away, pensions will become European, global salaries, health care at the level of .... only GDP does not allow all of this to rise, so do you think ??? Enough of this nonsense, have passed.

              Another will come and it will not be immediately settled, it may take a third and fourth until the new Peter I, Catherine II, and Stalin finally arrive. But the fact that GDP in the economy is not ice is unambiguous. To create an agglomeration from Moscow where 1/5 of the total population lives while eliminating all production there, but at the same time, salaries and pensions are 3 times higher than the national average, that is, in Moscow they receive times as much for the same labor as in Muhosk, while shouting labor productivity in the Russian Federation is low. With a flick of the finger, the salaries of certain categories of workers (military, security forces, accountants, doctors) are raised several times, and pay attention to all these categories that do not produce material values.
              All this has brought such an imbalance into the economy that no sanctions are necessary and so everything will be bent.
          3. +4
            24 October 2017 10: 19

            Who would have thought then that GDP will sit 20 years on the throne drinks
          4. +15
            24 October 2017 10: 29
            Quote: Stas157
            Maybe enough to finish building already? And, after all, for 18 years everything has been completed - it cannot be completed.

            Well, after what Yeltsin and Chubaisyat with the Gaydaryas reformed from 1991 to 1998, 30 years is not enough to eliminate the damage done to Russia. In 1998, if you remember, Russia went into default and was in a state of bankruptcy, with multibillion-dollar debts.
            Quote: Stas157
            Instead of the expected improvement in the life of the people, they want to make new taxes, raise excise taxes, and increase the length of their pension ..

            Yes, FIG knows - at the time of adoption of the country's GDP under their control, people in lines fought for matches and salt, and lately, more and more jewelry, household appliances and cars are in conflict. And yet, yes, at your leisure, read the Constitution, regarding the distribution of powers of the president and government. So, for taxes, excise taxes and other crap, the government is responsible, not the president.
            Quote: Stas157
            And three years ago, so generally a robbery of the people happened! Halved salaries with savings twice, and even for this no one was held responsible! Is this civilized growth?

            Well Duc and oil from $ 140 per barrel to $ 40 fell. Force Majeure however))) Throw information about what country in the world during this crisis period there was a rapid increase in the well-being of the people. A loaf of bread, as it cost around 30 rubles, is worth it, and the people saving the savings took three plasmas and four refrigerators each, increasing the sales of retail chains three times. I don’t argue, business activity decreased, salaries are not so hot, but on the whole the situation is even and with a drop in foreign exchange earnings we build such projects as the Crimean bridge, railway bypassing Urkaina, the North and South Stream, the Power of Siberia and other buns, whom our "partners" in impotent rage come from bloody diarrhea.
            1. +4
              24 October 2017 10: 58
              Quote: Nyrobsky
              Well, after what Yeltsin and Chubaisyat with the Gaidary people reformed from 1991 to 1998, 30 years is not enough to eliminate the damage done to Russia

              Here in this material, it is specifically redistributed specifically. Who arranged for us all a very "attractive" life in the criminal oligarchic capitalism that exists today in Russia.
              http://modernlib.ru/books/ergey_ara-urza/rah_/rea
              d/
              And it honestly lists the names of people who are exactly what the people have always briefly called Judas, not in the sense of nationality and religion, but in the sense of their activity in the destruction, deception of non-settlement and the collapse of the state. And these, now, in the country, including among managers. where there are so many, this is the trouble of society. For example, T. I. Zaslavskaya is an academician .. professor at Moscow State University AB Buzgalin, but you will not list everyone .. the result of their activities is more than obvious.
              1. +7
                24 October 2017 11: 49
                Quote: Pancir026
                in criminal oligrachic capitalism that exists today in Russia.

                According to grandfather Lenin, in all respects, Russia is entering the phase of imperialism following the formation of the MMC (state-monopoly capitalism). Those. after the bourgeois co-revolution of 1991, Russia rather quickly, to the surprise of our Western "partners", moved to the above phase of capitalism - imperialism, and became the US-EU global competitor for narrowing markets, along with China.
                Putin is a very good statesman, but represents the interests of the MMC.
                Putin does not create new elites, like Ivan the Terrible or Peter the Great, he is trying to reformat the Yeltsin elites inherited from the flesh and blood under the new era. Rather, Putin, similar to Alexander the 4rd, is a kind of conservative, besieging liberals. But! Alexander the 1rd, despite impressive foreign policy successes and some economic successes, as a result could not solve the main thing - the lack of rights and poverty of the main part of the people. But the nobles and the new bourgeois were very pleased. This inheritance went to the incompetent Nikolai the 3nd ... Well, everyone knows the result.
                I really would not want a repetition ...
                1. +7
                  24 October 2017 16: 02
                  a kind of conservative
                  Calling himself a liberal. By the way, I could attach Crimea, but Gref didn’t.
                2. 0
                  24 October 2017 19: 21
                  Quote: saruman
                  inherited from the flesh and blood of the Yeltsin elites under the new time.

                  Which, in turn, is, in fact, the late Soviet party-Komsomol nomenclature ...
            2. +13
              24 October 2017 12: 45
              and 30 years is not enough to eliminate the damage done to Russia

              A hundred years will pass and the followers will continue "and hundreds of years are not enough to eliminate the damage! Tighten the brothers' belts." Countries for such a period rose from the ashes without excess oil revenues.
              1. +4
                24 October 2017 14: 25
                Interestingly, the creation of one of the best poets in Russia, will they be removed or not?
                But she definitely determined what was going on in society.
                UNNA MORITS
                TWELVE QUESTIONS
                Why in the TV box around the clock
                Russia shit watered ki?
                And who chose these nasty faces?
                And the money for which they are paid, and who?
                Who and in which rooms were asked
                To voice hatred of the people of Russia?

                And is there another country where ki
                They sit in the TV box around the clock.
                And this country is insulted by words,
                Which we endure shamefully with you?
                Why and in which offices of Russia
                Were such abusers invited to us?

                Which of the ministers needs these scum,
                What are we being poured by streams of dirt?
                In the face ku crashing fast,
                Didn't he hit the minister on the face?
                And aren’t we the Man of Russia,
                What crashed in the face, was this requested?

                Salary is not a joke, but isn't it terrible
                For money, endure insults
                Whose muzzle proudly stars in the TV box
                And firmly confident in our patience?
                But we are not able to embed in the face?
                And aren’t we - the People of Russia?
                2017 year
              2. +2
                24 October 2017 19: 23
                Quote: Black5Raven
                Countries for such a period rose from the ashes without excess oil revenues.

                I repeat: 1922-1939. just 17 years old ...
                1. +3
                  25 October 2017 16: 23
                  Quote: AllXVahhaB
                  I repeat: 1922-1939. just 17 years old ...

                  And not only about the USSR as you indicated. Germany, Korea, Japan, part of the Arab countries and Israel where in 30 years huge cities grew up on the site of a bare desert. Singapore from a fishing village into what it turned.
                  1. 0
                    25 October 2017 22: 22
                    Quote: Black5Raven
                    Germany, Korea, Japan, part of the Arab countries and Israel where in 30 years huge cities grew up on the site of a bare desert. Singapore from a fishing village into what it turned.

                    Are they all under sanctions? Or are they like after the collapse of the USSR they split pieces from their territories on which plants with industries and entire industries were located, which were part of a single economic space, breaking all production ties? We switched from a plan to a market, changed the system from socialist to capitalist with the opening of its market to Western consumer goods, which ditched the remnants of Soviet production? No, my friend, it’s not so simple, and the example you cited in the situation with Russia does not roll. Chubais said - "Every closed factory is a nail in the lid of the tomb of communism," that is, the destruction of Russia's industrial potential was planned. Was it like that in the countries you listed?
                    1. 0
                      26 October 2017 01: 00
                      Quote: Nyrobsky
                      the destruction of Russia's industrial potential was planned

                      Quote: Nyrobsky
                      Are they all under sanctions? Or are they like after the collapse of the USSR they split pieces from their territories on which plants with industries and entire industries were located, which were part of a single economic space, breaking all production ties? We switched from a plan to a market, changed the system from socialist to capitalist with the opening of our market to Western consumer goods

                      Yes, can you imagine? The Germans were bombed in the Stone Age, huge casualties, huge territories fell off / divided into parts and other joys. There are many other examples as well, but there’s no point in bringing them up. And so it’s clear that you are an adherent of "round-the-clock dreams of mother Rus, we are the only ones, and all around insidious heaps send damage and do not give development, but we don’t give up."


                      You will always find an excuse.
                      1. 0
                        26 October 2017 01: 44
                        Quote: Black5Raven
                        The Germans were bombed in the Stone Age, huge casualties, huge territories fell off / divided into parts and other joys. There are many other examples as well, but there’s no point in bringing them up. And so it’s clear that you are an adherent of "round-the-clock dreams of mother Rus, we alone are lights, and around insidious raids send all damage and do not give development, but we do not give up." You will always find an excuse.

                        And do you think it means Fascist Germany entered the USSR in 1941 to distribute sweets? And 20 million dead citizens of the USSR from 1941 to 1945. very insignificant losses? Half of the country was in ruin. Only now from 1945 to 1975, over the same 30 years, the country was restored and a nuclear bomb was made and flew into space, not counting everything else. And where is the excuse? It is your tribe that seeks out abomination, and if it is not there, it does not disdain that it invents itself.
            3. +4
              24 October 2017 17: 13
              Energy superpower? lol Wealth from the bowels to take the same and skill and labor are needed. I do not argue. But Without a Project of life, without a Mission. without understanding what this hydrocarbon money is needed for, it would be better if it lay there and on again .. It’s there, of course, do you understand it? Yes, even if it were endless, leaving giant empty cavities in the earth is not reasonable behavior What is it Is this hour now? For patching holes, for maintaining the life of the colonial Bretton Woods system, for Chinese shmathy, large-assembly Western cars and for replacing a smartphone every 2 years, which will be silent immediately after the destruction of electromagnetic ammunition, for mansions in which soon you will have to set up orphanages again , to the Millerovsky “Peterhof” near Moscow and travels for ordinary employees of Gazprom, to the Olympics and the fashionable World Cup for football .. You already have all the orphans in family orphanages, you have work in every small town. your cancer is driven below the bar of global statistics; you have Russian moths the most expensive in the world, because no one wants this shameful profession ?! laughing Railway bypassing Ukraine and gas pipelines? The same achievement for me .. It would be better if they didn’t allow such Ukraine!
            4. 0
              26 October 2017 13: 16
              Nyrobsky October 24, 2017 10:29 ↑
              Well, after what Yeltsin and Chubaisyat with the Gaydaryas reformed from 1991 to 1998, 30 years is not enough to eliminate the damage done to Russia. In 1998, if you remember, Russia went into default and was in a state of bankruptcy, with multibillion-dollar debts.

              Twice the Communists achieved a much better result with much worse starting conditions. And without oil revenues.
          5. +3
            24 October 2017 16: 16
            ABOUT! Stas157 came and again cry Yaroslavna floats over the fields. Just cry through something lying, suggestive that the speaker is either engaged or hopeless ... um - shortsighted. For example:
            it’s been building everything for 18 years - it can’t finish it. Instead of the expected improvement in people's lives

            Yeah, there are absolutely no improvements after the 90s, and if there are, then it is so insignificant that you will not notice. I’m stupid, I thought, I began to live better, thanks to Mr. Stas157, I explained that it all seems to me. Or here is another pearl from the same Mr.:
            And three years ago, so generally a robbery of the people happened! Halved salaries with savings in half

            You can write such nonsense only by suffering from memory lapses or “turning on a fool”, because any sane person remembers that three years ago three economic sabotages were committed against Russia, firstly, they artificially dropped the price of oil, and secondly, they introduced rather severe sanctions and thirdly, they dropped the ruble exchange rate. Any of these actions is not a gift in itself, and all three at the same time ... But this is for those who think, and for Mr. Stas157 the main slogan is the same as in the whole "civilized" world - Putin is to blame.
            1. +10
              24 October 2017 17: 49
              Write such nonsense .. sane person.
              Do not insult, you will not be insulted.
              firstly artificially dropped the price of oil
              Who are you?
              secondly, they introduced rather strict sanctions and thirdly, they dropped the ruble exchange rate
              Who are the sanctions against? is your surname Rotenberg? and who dropped the course?
              Putin is already to blame for the fact that, as head of state, he should and must be responsible for everything that relates to the state. And then he deftly succeeds in blaming Lenin and Stalin and the entire Soviet period, but what did he do? Paid medicine, life on credit? ..
          6. 0
            24 October 2017 16: 26
            Quote: Stas157
            Halved salaries with savings twice, and even for this no one was held responsible!

            In dollars or what? And who should answer? US Fed?
            1. +10
              24 October 2017 18: 17
              Quote: AllXVahhaB
              In dollars or what? And who should answer? US Fed?

              Do not like dollars, count in gold or euros ... As you wish! In fact, 2 times it turns out. For the fall of the national currency should be responsible for the Central Bank and the cabinet. If no one is punished, then responsibility goes one step higher. That is, the president.
          7. +1
            24 October 2017 20: 32
            Quote: Stas157
            it’s been building everything for 18 years - it can’t finish it. Instead of the expected improvement in the life of the people, they want to make new taxes, raise excise taxes, increase pension experience ... And three years ago, that’s how a people’s robbery happened! Halved salaries with savings twice, and even for this no one was held responsible!

            All-wee plants need to be set up first, for self-sufficiency! Import substitution.
            To create jobs in the end ... It's at least a few years!
            And then think about retirement ...
        2. +9
          24 October 2017 08: 47
          And if Putin leaves? Operation "Successor" is likely, logical, possible!

          Putin will not turn halfway! Not for that he did castling with Medvedev and not for that increased the term of the presidency! Putin’s goal is to make Russia one of the leading countries and make it great again. And knowing the nature of the president, you can be sure that Vladimir Vladimirovich will achieve his goal. Ahead of him remains only one term and he needs to use it 100%. And to shift the plan to someone else-this is not in the style of Putin. I think there will be no successor yet! It will appear only at the end of the next term of the presidency. And he will most likely come out of a cohort of young managers whom Putin is now “running through” in mayoral posts.
          1. +14
            24 October 2017 10: 28
            Tell this to the victims of fire in Rostov, where the administrator burned down the houses and now they are taking the earth away. What suspicious series of arson were you don’t think?
            1. +9
              24 October 2017 11: 01
              Quote: spirit
              suspicious series of arson was not consider

              What is suspicious? Drop it ... everything within the framework of the current model-needs of the population, nobody cares, the main thing is profit at all costs.
              And how, through arson, murder is not important, profit is more important than ever, in practice, the dictum is remembered - for 100% they will go to offense. For 200% for any, for 300% the mother will be killed.
            2. +3
              24 October 2017 17: 16
              The same thing has been tested in Arkhangelsk for the past 10 years. Not so massive. but regularly and steadily!
            3. +3
              24 October 2017 19: 26
              Quote: spirit
              Tell this to the victims of fire in Rostov, where the administrator burned down the houses and now they are taking the earth away. What suspicious series of arson were you don’t think?

              Outside the window, rain and hail. This is Putin's fault!
              The cat left the kittens - Putin is to blame,
              Mistress threw a hare - Guilty, guess!
              Here comes the board The unfortunate goby,
              Our Tanya cries loudly - Nearby Putin, not otherwise!
              The light went out, the fence fell, The car stalled motor,
              Healthy tooth removed Ile climbed into the apartment thief,
              I didn’t like the movie. You’ve come to shit ...
              Any cataclysm has one explanation ...
              Every democrat knows - Putin is to blame!
              Who yesterday in my porch Lift to the ceiling?
              Believe me, comrades, this is Putin’s hand!
              I caught drunk "squirrel" - This is Putin's tricks!
              A pile of shit under the table. This is Putin's fault!
              The toilet is clogged - This is Putin’s order,
              I threw bull-calves there, Merged water - and was such!
              At night, the clothes are stolen, Glasses are breaking in our house.
              Dancing drunk in the yard. This is Putin - a riffraff!
              There is no escape from the villain! Matom writes on the walls
              Broke the bushes in the alley. This is Putin - oh and oh!
              Liberala is wetting the rain - Putin laughs merrily.
              Flooded your cottage? - This is Putin, not otherwise!
              Did you find a thunderstorm along the way? - That hand got the Kremlin.
              Cold, wind, snow - Putin is again to blame.
              Blowing down a hurricane? - This is Putin taking revenge on the rams.
              Storm, tsunami, flood? - This is Putin, no doubt!
              Rainstorm, landslide, cyclone - Of course he is to blame
              Sel, avalanche, rockfall? - Clear: Putin is to blame!
              Tornado, typhoon, earthquake - There is no escape from Putin!
              A crow pecked at the crown? - This is a young friend of the riot police.
              Bees, wasps sting you? - This is Putin's SpetsNaz.
              See this bumblebee? - He is in the service of the Kremlin!
              If you believe in it - It's just paranoia!
          2. +20
            24 October 2017 11: 33
            Dear, SRC P-15. “... Putin’s goal is to make Russia one of the leading countries and make it great again ...” - You wrote a beautiful slogan. He is already embodied in life. You just do not know. Russia is an advanced country. "... According to Credit Suisse, 10% of the richest Russians own 89% of the total wealth of all Russian households, over the year this share has grown by 2 percentage points. It is significantly more than in other large economies, the authors of the survey compare: in the US 10% of the wealthiest account for 78% of the country's wealth, 73% in China. A high concentration of wealth is reflected in the fact that Russia is second only to China and the USA in the number of billionaires, Credit Suisse notes. ... "
            Your phrase: "... He has only one term left ahead and he needs to use it 100% ..." - it simply causes admiration. That is, it must be assumed that in the next term of the presidency of V. Putin it should be so that 10% of the most wealthy Russians own 100% of the total well-being of all Russian households ???
            1. +6
              24 October 2017 14: 16
              Dear "AA17", I know about our poverty even without your calculations from the Internet. What exactly do you offer? All share? It was already that. My opinion is this: now that the whole west is against us, the president cannot be changed! Let Putin complete his plan, and only then will we criticize his rule. I don’t know about you, but I don’t want to go back to the 90s! And dreaming of the return of the USSR is too late. It was necessary to fight at that time, and not now. Look how you spit quotes in your comments. And where were you during the collapse of the USSR? Your knowledge would then be very useful. I, a pensioner who does not live richly, give my vote for Putin. Because I feel: this person will lead our country to prosperity. And to sit at a computer and spread it out how everything is bad with us, this is the lot of the weak. To do what?
              1. +9
                24 October 2017 14: 44
                Quote: СРЦ П-15
                What exactly do you offer? All share? It was already that.

                Whether you are free or not, to echo the liberals repeat the most shameful breed ... why?
                Quote: СРЦ П-15
                Let Putin complete his plan, and only then will we criticize his rule.

                Okay. What is “conceived” if no one can understand. What ideology is in our country? Which everyone is looking for cannot find, but they understand from their necks and belts that something is wrong in the conservatory, and many others. We will not take Ksyukha and her like Chichvarkin-Khodorkovsky’s moans into account, they have already shown themselves in 90. It’s not possible to listen to adepts who “glorify” 90 with the money of SOROS ...
                Quote: СРЦ П-15
                And dreaming of the return of the USSR is too late.

                Who says that we must certainly return to that USSR?
                A lesson has been learned on how to keep in check all kinds of intellectuals, crime and nomenclature, so maybe we should not talk about returning, but taking into account errors in the new ..SSSR2, or something else to say, it doesn’t matter, under what conditions and how will it feel not 0,2%, but the majority? Didn’t think or something is bothering? Who is bothering clearly .. there are many of them, all liberal mantras learned back in the damned 90 out loud ..
                Quote: СРЦ П-15
                . It was necessary to fight at that time, and not now.

                Oh how ... and now there will be a nose in a rag and a slave to Abramovich. Potanin, Weskelberg and the like of a smaller caliber?
                Quote: СРЦ П-15
                I, a pensioner who does not live richly, give my vote for Putin.

                For you and reckoning, they threw you 300 r well, and that's enough, you are satisfied beyond measure, and then in the queue sniff, everything is bad, the pension is small. Not enough .. but stubbornly reproduce all the same that the last reason of reason bother you ..
                Quote: СРЦ П-15
                Because I feel: this person will lead our country to prosperity

                I feel ... yeah. What did you feel when you were 90? How will you live in a penny, colorful and entertaining, voting for Yeltsin and his ilk? And didn’t you think now, and even more so since you brought the destroyers to power? the picture of successes outside, as it is not very encouraging in relation to the state within the country.
                Quote: СРЦ П-15
                And to sit at a computer and spread it out how everything is bad with us, this is the lot of the weak.

                And to glorify, therefore, the lot of the "strong" .. strange logic.
                Putin is criticized not because he is Putin, but because Putin is few, since he can’t throw off the misconceptions of the past and stubbornly clings to those forces and those from which the country is not good enough.
                Criticism and criticism are two different things, don’t you understand?
                Quote: СРЦ П-15
                To do what?

                Question .. Do what the country and its people need to do. And not 0,2% of the people who imagine themselves and spit on 99% of the people living in Russia. Is there little power or blinders from Sobchak and other smart-hearted intellectuals get in the way?
                Read ... you will be useful.
                The destruction of the USSR was carried out in the form of an "anti-Soviet revolution" of the late 80s - early 90s of the XX century. Its preliminary, “cold” phase was the restructuring of Gorbachev, during which the superstructure of the Soviet life arrangement was destroyed, after which the Yeltsin brigade was able to dismantle its basis. Of course, neither the superstructure, nor the basis of the Soviet system has been completely destroyed, for more than 20 years a viscous “positional war” has been going on, but the great historical period ended with the collapse of the USSR.
                http://detectivebooks.ru/book/29151430/?page=49
              2. +9
                24 October 2017 15: 16
                Dear, SRC P-15. Pancir026 explained everything to you well. I’ll add on my own. You repeat the liberal nonsense "share everything." If you wanted to throw a stone in the Bolshevik garden, then this is by. They took and MADE ALL PUBLIC. But the liberals in the 90s, all social wealth that was created by the work of several generations, including yours and my labor, and many more citizens of the USSR, TAKE AND SHARE BETWEEN 10% of the “prosperous” population of Russia. Is it really not obvious to you. Nobody is going to build the USSR. But all the best that should have been used. And a pensioner can be different (a former deputy, a former official, a former employee of the oil and gas industry, etc.). They will probably support GDP. And I'm 2 years old until retirement. I assume that upon retirement, my life will deteriorate sharply. I will work while my health allows. And I’ll tell you frankly - I’m really ashamed that I “pissed off” such a Great Country that my ancestors left me.
                1. +3
                  24 October 2017 19: 02
                  Quote: AA17
                  And a pensioner can be different (a former deputy, a former official, a former employee of the oil and gas industry, etc.). They will probably support GDP.

                  But what about simple hard workers like me? I have been retired for the third year, but I work as an electrician and not in the oil and gas industry, but in agriculture. Yes, I work, but I do not whine, although I have reasons for this. I do what I can for my homeland - I work where my strength allows me. And nothing more is required of us: try to honestly work each in his place. Yes, and I am ashamed that they did not save such a state, but even now I try not to pour water on the mill of the West, shouting how bad everything is with us. It's normal with us, though not as we would like, but fine! Compared to the 90s, heaven and earth. And it will be better, I'm sure of it. I’ll tell you more: at first I didn’t trust Putin, but I was smart enough to compare all the facts and turn my opinion 180 degrees. And now for me, Putin is the man who puts all his strength into the revival of the country. And for such a person I am ready for fire and water! No matter how pathetic it sounded.
                  1. +1
                    25 October 2017 13: 51
                    Quote: СРЦ П-15
                    Compared to the 90s, heaven and earth.

                    Right?
                    Well, let's say.
                    But as you explain. While you,
                    Quote: СРЦ П-15
                    Yes, and I am ashamed that they did not save such a state, but even now I try not to pour water on the mill of the West, shouting how bad everything is with us

                    take the position of an ostrich,
                    Quote: СРЦ П-15
                    I do what I can for my homeland - I work where my strength allows me.

                    Convincing yourself that you are supposedly working for your homeland, in fact, you are plowing on a part, which is worthless. Assigns the lion's share, paying you a salary from your earned pension and your current job?
                    You read the link, read it, read it carefully. And do not make excuses for those who, since 90, have misled and frankly deceived you. Forcing you to believe in the good of grabbing and other "good" that fed you so generously in 90.
              3. +8
                24 October 2017 15: 20
                against us all west
                If you think so, why are billions being transferred to the West?
                Take everything away and share it enchantingly! But hasn't the present power taken everything from the Soviet people? You are more for the liberal president, then you yourself are a liberal.
                What has Putin recently said about co-financing medicine? That is, we pay taxes, but medicine will be completely paid, and if there is no money, then die.
                How will he lead to prosperity if he does everything for the good of the oligarchs?
                1. +1
                  24 October 2017 16: 32
                  СРЦ - colleague "physicist",
                  spirit, AA17 - "lyricists" political scientists, idealists. Here, sit in a soft chair, bend your fingers, think about the aspirations of the people who are doing business to criticize ... They say everyone does not!
                  Empty, not even worth controversy.
                  You are not interesting to me, empty chimes.
                  Interestingly, do you even know what place to plant potatoes in the ground? Or is it growing on a tree?
                  1. +4
                    24 October 2017 17: 52
                    Or is it growing on a tree?
                    It’s a good idea to choose a president for potato planting skills. recourse
              4. 0
                28 October 2017 00: 19
                Quote: SRC P-15
                My opinion is this: now that the whole west is against us, the president cannot be changed! Let Putin complete his plan, and only then will we criticize his rule.

                And do not share what the GDP is up to and what he wants to bring to the end? The first two terms of the media were worried by the question "Who is Putin," he has been in power for 17 years, but I still do not understand that he wants the GDP, what he is building?
          3. +5
            24 October 2017 23: 47
            Quote: СРЦ П-15
            there will be no successor yet! It will appear only at the end of the next term of the presidency. And he will most likely come out of a cohort of young managers whom Putin is now “running through” in mayoral posts.

            Who said that what Putin is doing is good for the country ?! You? Putin himself? Your tv? Can you name at least one action by Putin that would be good for the country? Not even that. Good for the country's population?
        3. +1
          24 October 2017 13: 12
          If Putin leaves, then he will come .. and life will become easier and more fun ..
        4. 0
          24 October 2017 19: 36
          truly. KS2000
      2. +1
        24 October 2017 11: 56
        Quote: Uncle Lee
        By the stars, by the palm, by the insides of the sacrificial animals!

        ... Tarot cards, the technique of the girl Lenormand, the Wangi method, Chinese fortunetelling sticks, bones with runes, hex nuts ... You can also on coffee grounds ... from the mocha coffee of the 1926 crop ...
    2. +2
      24 October 2017 09: 48
      Author: Yuri Podolyaka ,,,
      GDP will not go away. At the crossing of horses do not change. Programs of action are announced at the Valdai Forum both in the external arena and on the internal stage.
      GDP: "So I don’t think they will miss me for so long." "
      1. +7
        24 October 2017 11: 14
        Quote: To be or not to be
        At the crossing of horses do not change

        Well, they’re shooting horses :-)
    3. +3
      24 October 2017 12: 02
      Not to me. I do not guess, but reflect on the basis of known facts ..
    4. +1
      24 October 2017 14: 43
      One can guess, but on the other hand the message is correct, like: let the receiver practice, under the close watch of the sensei.
    5. 0
      24 October 2017 16: 46
      Some kind of nonsense.
  2. +1
    24 October 2017 06: 22
    In the current situation, the successor may simply not remain in power, even if his uncle Vova will support, it is another matter if this successor appears after the elections in the arena, in the economic bloc, for example, and after some time will replace Medvedev.
    1. +4
      24 October 2017 09: 03
      Well, a person like Shoigu, and even with the help of GDP, will not only hold on, but also some, such as an echo in a sheep’s horn, will be erased by purely economic methods
      1. 0
        25 October 2017 07: 28
        Dear, you think that everything is so simple. Palace games have not been canceled. What Shoigu. The king is made by the retinue. environment advisers.
    2. 0
      24 October 2017 09: 47
      I think Medvedev will leave sooner ....
  3. +10
    24 October 2017 07: 17
    Guessing that, Putin knows that the hay they give is nothing to chew on. And it’s better to calmly leave than wait until somewhere in 2019, under the rubble, everything will die.
    1. +11
      24 October 2017 07: 23
      Quote: Gardamir
      ... it’s better to calmly leave than to wait until rsomeday in 2019, under the rubble, everything will die

      Dreamy: but, I remember, in October 2017 they promised hevoly-ju-juziya ... feel
      Prophets, damn it ... Cassandra, (censorship) negative
      1. +21
        24 October 2017 07: 32
        promised
        I did not promise. But the fact that Ms. Nabiullina again transferred billions of dollars to America in August is a fact.
        1. +7
          24 October 2017 07: 48
          It's funny to talk with you:
          Quote: Golovan Jack
          but, I remember, in October 2017 they promised gevolu-ju-juziya ...

          Quote: Gardamir
          I did not promise. But the fact that Ms. Nabiullina again transferred billions of dollars to America in August is a fact

          About what you did not promise - there will be time - I will look. All moves are written, you are in the know wink
          And so - your answer reminded me of a very anecdote, about the lieutenant of the immortal Rzhevsky:
          By the way, about the hare ... yesterday we had a pop from the bell tower ... I got it, I didn’t even tweet

          Keep laughing Yes
          1. +20
            24 October 2017 07: 51
            make laugh
            I do not see anything funny. There is no money for the development of the state because we are sending to America.
            1. +8
              24 October 2017 08: 25
              The money was sent to the states because the Russian Federation lacks sovereignty. So are the assigned debts for the USSR, to countries that were not then ----- the Russian Federation paid recently.
              Then he was drunk !! He had no mistakes! And the crime!
              What country went to Yeltsin? And what kind of Putin?
            2. +10
              24 October 2017 09: 54
              Quote: Gardamir
              There is no money for the development of the state because we are sending to America ..

              Compare the amount (in money) of the budget of the Russian Federation and the amount spent on the purchase of treasure (by the way, this money will then be returned, it will not go anywhere). How to compare - please, write off ... about your impressions wink
              Quote: Krylov "Crow and the Fox"
              How many times have they repeated to the world ...

              Quote: Gardamir
              ... again transferred billions of dollars to America ...

              This is not that money. And she didn’t “list” it, but bought it with paper. Valuable, m / y other Yes

              And your main mistake is that you confuse the money for travel and current expenses with money for apartment renovation, if we speak in common terms.
              Quote: Reptiloid
              The money was sent to the states because, the Russian Federation lacks sovereignty ...

              Well, ReptiloidWell, excusable ... he is a reptiloid .. but you are positioning yourself as an adult, intelligent person ... it’s time to sort out where the flies are, and where are the cutlets request
              1. +1
                24 October 2017 15: 23
                Are you being paid for stupid things or is it a calling?
              2. +7
                24 October 2017 17: 33
                Quote: Golovan Jack
                Quote: Gardamir
                There is no money for the development of the state because we are sending to America ..


                ... And your main mistake is that you confuse the money for travel and current expenses with money for apartment renovation, if we speak in common terms.

                Well, ReptiloidWell, excusable ... he is a reptiloid .. but you are positioning yourself as an adult, intelligent person ... it’s time to sort out where the flies are, and where are the cutlets request


                Well, now you will explain to me, financially competent ours, why in order to save money for “apartment renovation” I have to bring their old lady interest-bearing woman to the river, which will give them out there at 1,5% per annum to financially wealthy blacks, and not to your own village loan office? .. Do you have so much money that blows away, do you have absolutely nowhere to use it in development projects in your country? Until now, there are no civilian aircraft in mass production, in Boeing’s bondage which is stifling both Ukrainian and Russian aircraft production, there are still no small aircraft for the hinterland. and in the USSR there was- everywhere .. YOU have already paved the autobahns to every small city, have all the pits paved? Damn, the entire Kola Peninsula lives on money and handouts of norgs, losing 15-20 thousand people annually, and they send yasak to Washington and still make smart faces in the photo! negative
              3. +3
                25 October 2017 00: 04
                Hello, Golovan Jack. Some time ago there was one very smart character and his name was KOTManul. Was yes swam. Your style reminded me of it. It is you?
            3. 0
              25 October 2017 07: 30
              Money is not sent to the United States but invested in US securities. So many countries do.
      2. +2
        24 October 2017 11: 15
        Quote: Golovan Jack
        Dreamy: but, I remember, in October 2017 they promised hevoly-ju-juziya ...

        the bourgeoisie began the revolution and in February, we are waiting for February 2, 2018, here will be an interesting picture
    2. +4
      24 October 2017 10: 40
      Quote: Gardamir
      Guessing that, Putin knows that the hay they give is nothing to chew on. And it’s better to calmly leave than wait until somewhere in 2019, under the rubble, everything will die.

      If you look at the situation of GDP and Merkel, then, with equal cases of “changeability” of power, Merkel has more chances to die under the rubble in 2019 than Putin. For some reason, Angela’s constancy as German Chancellor doesn’t bother anyone, and in the case of GDP, in certain liberal pro-Western circles, it causes violent indignation and the demand for the transfer of power. Vegetable them in vegetable oil, because 80% of Russia's population per GDP.
      1. 0
        24 October 2017 13: 30
        Quote: sa-ag
        there will be an interesting picture

        And I look forward to a debate between the candidates.
        Sobchak-Zyuganov or Putin-Sobchak. wassat
      2. +5
        24 October 2017 14: 45
        GDP and Merkel
        My country is Russia and I do not care about all the presidents of the world. But the question for Putin is whether he will be the president of the inhabitants of Russia or a partner of the oligarchs. If the first case, then let him sit forever, if the second, then did he stay there.
        1. 0
          24 October 2017 23: 29
          Quote: Gardamir
          My country is Russia and I do not care about all the presidents of the world. But the question for Putin is whether he will be the president of the inhabitants of Russia or a partner of the oligarchs. If the first case, then let him sit forever, if the second, then did he stay there.

          In the popular sense, the "president" of the inhabitants was Stalin, but for you Stalin is like a red rag for a bull. All other countries of the world today have a president who in one way or another depends on big business, i.e. taking into account the interests of the oligarchy. The United States generally lies with the interests of corporations, and the oligarch Trump is in power.
  4. +9
    24 October 2017 07: 26
    2018 will be a difficult year, many “unpopular” changes, including NK and so forth is postponed for this year, so as not to lose political.ochki. Even if Putin leaves, then sobsno nothing will change, the new course will also primarily be aimed at maintaining the stability of the position of the oligarchic elite, but for the rest on the basis of the remainder.
  5. +8
    24 October 2017 07: 38
    The author has an interesting version, but quite logical. We will see.
    1. +2
      24 October 2017 11: 17
      Quote: Corporal
      The author has an interesting version, but quite logical. We will see.

      I like it too. T.O. Putin will "kill" 3 "hares" at once. laughing
      1. AUL
        0
        24 October 2017 19: 17
        Dreaming ...
  6. 0
    24 October 2017 08: 19
    As well as the choice of possible candidates for this role .....
    Already whom they just did not woo in "receivers", but the GDP keeps secrets well laughing
  7. +2
    24 October 2017 08: 49
    Why change the manager, if he copes with his duties? So you will expel a good employee from work and in his place you don’t take anyone? Say stupid? So why should we change the one on whom the well-being of each of us depends on who knows whom?
    We can not judge the adoption of a decision on a specific issue because we don’t even have a part of the information that falls on the president’s table. Its activities can be judged by the welfare of the country and each of us, taking into account external factors. If the dynamics are positive, then let him rule for at least a thousand years.
    Over in Germany, Merkel has been shaking for a long time, and their GDP is only growing, and I generally suspect that this leapfrog with the elections was specially invented to prevent countries from developing normally. Consider that half a year, a year before the election, you should not think about the country, but about how to win and another half a year, a year after winning, enter the management process - and consider that out of five years, two are empty (and who is driving at this time?), and if the "well-wishers" give the iPhone, then there is no time to think about the state at all ...
  8. 0
    24 October 2017 08: 50
    And there will be an iPhone.
  9. +2
    24 October 2017 08: 51
    After the election for the first time as a resident of Russia, the GDP spoke at the "party farm" in the FSB and joked in gbesh style: "The operation to introduce the agent to the highest echelons of power in Russia was successful!" The joke went to “Hurray!” I saw it myself on the box. I give a tooth that something like operation “President” is being prepared in the bowels of the Office and now!
  10. +4
    24 October 2017 08: 51
    Putin cannot rule the country forever. Sooner or later he will have to leave

    Better late. So far, everything is going fine if you do not take into account the howls of the "liberals" about the poor and worthless compared to the United States Russia. If we need a country, not an American appendage, then it is better to wake up the GDP.
    1. +16
      24 October 2017 09: 07
      Fine?! Well, if we consider the status of a raw comprador semicolony a la China of the mid-19th century, sorry to translate into modern newspeak, a great energy superpower, normal, then of course yes, everything is fine. Yes, it’s not just normal, everyone just got hurt, especially if you rely on a barrel for 100 bucks, as it was during the “heyday” of the mid-zero. About "minor" troubles like the Washington ultimatum, Syria, Donbass, the systemic economic crisis, which easily turns into a political one, etc. you can even keep silent. By the way, didn’t you read the draft budget? There are a lot of interesting things, for example, increasing excise taxes on fuel ...
    2. +6
      24 October 2017 10: 08
      Data from the world's largest Numbeo user content database. She compiled a rating of the countries of the world in terms of living standards as of mid-2016
      The quality of life index was determined by several criteria using online research, without the use of official government reports.
      The quality of life is a fairly broad concept.

      The quality of life index (the higher the better) is an assessment of the quality of life in general.
      1 Denmark
      2 Switzerland
      3 Australia
      4 New Zealand
      5 Germany
      ...
      10 United States
      .....

      54 Egypt
      55 Russia
      56 Ukraine
      57 Indonesia
      1. +3
        24 October 2017 11: 56
        Why spread this nonsense? Is Ukraine next to Russia in terms of living? Funny!)) It's as funny as saying that millions of Swiss guest workers go to Denmark to earn money (Denmark is higher in the ranking).
        1. +9
          24 October 2017 12: 50
          And you watch less often in the evening with Shapiro, who has had Ukraine for three years now and will no longer be funny. Life in Ukraine does not differ strikingly from ours. Everything is the same: loans, mortgages, a communal apartment, dependence on the dollar-euro exchange rate, gasoline and food prices and other achievements of the civilized world. That is, everything is the same as ours, with the only difference being that we have nowhere to go to work as migrant workers.
        2. +6
          24 October 2017 13: 56
          I do not like this source, let’s take another: Legatum Prosperity Index agency. When calculating the data, it focuses not only on national indicators, but also on the quality of life of the population itself, taking into account salary levels, the educational system, the ratio of prices in the state and the real financial situation of the average citizen.

          In 2016-2017, in fact, according to the agency, Russia in the world list takes 61 places with a total of 142 points, located between Sri Lanka and Vietnam.
          The following indicators characterize the concept of quality of life: Health of residents. It takes into account life expectancy, disease (their severity and duration), well-being and ability of people, mortality rates. Quality, balance and regularity of food, environmental safety of products. Educational level - the duration of training, the depth and degree of scientific knowledge, the availability of educational literature. The conditions and nature of employment, labor efficiency and tension, compliance with inclinations, the possibility of professional choice. As well as criteria such as unemployment, employment, working hours and holidays, the degree of automation of work, and even the atmosphere in the team. Living conditions - the size and degree of improvement of housing, convenience in everyday life. The system of social benefits and security. These are guarantees for the payment of pensions, benefits and sick leave, care for families with children. The possibility and accessibility of the choice of types of recreation, its duration and the satisfaction received from it. Finally, the realization of universal human rights is safe, protected from terrorist attacks and epidemics, and the loyalty of legal bodies.
          In terms of such indicators as the effectiveness of public administration and the level of corruption, our country occupies an honorable 115th place (for comparison: last and the year before last, there were 119th and 96th respectively).
          Under the item "quality of education" our positions are not so bad - 26th place (against 27th last year). For every teacher in the country, there are 18 students. At the same time, 53% of the country's population are satisfied with Russian education. The health of Russians allows us to take only 44th place in the ranking (as in previous years). Such an important indicator as the average life expectancy, we have only 60 years (in Europe - 70-75 years). According to this most important criterion, the standard of living in Russia clearly does not reach the world level. Russia's security rating is getting lower, now it is 98th place (97th and 82nd respectively in the past and the year before last). Only about 43,8% of Russians do not feel a sense of danger, especially on the night streets of their native cities. Apparently, such a concept as freedom of citizens is not held in high esteem - we are only in 114th place (142 in total). At the same time, 60,9% of Russians believe that they have the possibility of free choice, including in the expression of their own thoughts. The rest do not agree with them.
          1. +1
            24 October 2017 23: 12
            3 Overlock ↑
            Today, 13: 56
            I don’t like this source, let’s take another one: the Legatum Prosperity Index agency. Here I see all this Liberty Corporation, I immediately understand that they definitely won’t lie about Russia)))) why should they?
            1. +2
              26 October 2017 15: 16
              do not like imported ones; see domestic ones: Golodets, Accounts Chamber or the nearest store. ZhEK. The essence of this does not change
        3. +5
          24 October 2017 14: 02
          I have the opportunity to communicate with the Russians who enter Ukraine and return home. Their assessment of the state of affairs in Ukraine, from the point of view of the layman, does not coincide with the assessment of our television box and especially Kiselev
          1. 0
            25 October 2017 07: 33
            Everyone sees war from his trench. Moreover, the opinion of those who traveled and arrived. And then the TV box and Kisilev. He calculates that everyone is stupid except you and can only receive information from TV. So you are mistaken
            1. +1
              25 October 2017 11: 00
              in your opinion there is only your opinion. and the rest are stupid?
            2. +1
              25 October 2017 11: 19
              what a strange way to speak on behalf of everyone? While the muzzle on the table can not be driven, it does not reach. Your snobbery is not a sign of mind. The truth is usually. always in the middle. Even in Ukraine!
      2. +5
        24 October 2017 17: 44
        So in Ukraine, it’s kind of like losing 1/4 of the territory and kind of like a war, against themselves? and all the same on the same level with Russia .. "Padded jackets" attacked Ukraine. And who is Russia? wassat
        1. +3
          24 October 2017 17: 47
          attacked themselves.
  11. +16
    24 October 2017 08: 58
    All in longing recall the USSR, they only vote for the party in power, as if it were not worse. For twenty years, we are not moving forward, at best, marking time. The state is pushing off its commitments in medicine, education, pensions, housing and communal services, all this is slowly hanging on citizens. The USSR, at a lower oil price, contained all this plus military expenses, where does the difference go? And what stability is again, it is necessary to vote for the Communists, they will not make mistakes by scientific experience, only Zyuganov has become familiar, he has become manual.
    1. +3
      24 October 2017 12: 22
      Vote for the Communists, just because they are Communists? How do they differ from the same EdRo? Nothing. They just hide behind old slogans and supposedly ideology. The Communists ended when in the 90s Zyuganov was afraid to take power. Now this is another manual batch.
      1. +5
        24 October 2017 12: 31
        Yes, I will vote for the Communists only because they are Communists, but how else to show my attitude to the current government? Do not go to the polls, vote for the liberals of the Democrats, knowing what they did in the 90s. Tell me, when you talk with people who they vote for, they speak for the Communists, only wins edro. And why should I vote for others if I consider it right to vote for the Communists.
        1. +1
          24 October 2017 15: 10
          Your business, of course. And about the fact that everyone allegedly votes for the Communists - it is doubtful. People either do not vote at all, or vote for EdRo. They just don’t say it out loud. Out of caution. Just in case.
          1. +2
            25 October 2017 07: 36
            You're right . These are the people. they say one thing and do another. He himself worked in the election commission. No fraud. Honestly defeated EP.
        2. 0
          25 October 2017 07: 35
          And after how many years again, the arrival of Yeltsin and Gorbachev and the collapse of the country.
  12. +14
    24 October 2017 09: 00
    . which pushes back the intrigue of nominating a pro-government candidate for the deadline.
    Why did the Kremlin decide to maintain the intrigue until the very end? I’ll venture to suggest that the successor scenario is being considered today
    I spoke about this half a year ago. The fact that Putin will run for office as soon as possible! What is this for? It is for intrigue. In order to generate hidden fear in some part of our population, and the uncertainty that Putin may suddenly not become president! That the cry of despair is born: "Putin! Do not leave us !!! Let’s get lost! Orphaned!" ... And then, our chosen one will condescend to the people, will royally declare that he agrees to accept such a heavy burden, once again.
    1. +3
      24 October 2017 09: 21
      Quote: Stas157
      "Putin! Do not leave us !!! Lost! Orphaned!" ... And then, our chosen one will condescend to the people, will royally declare that he agrees to accept such a heavy burden, once again.

      We had few senile people in power, one more serve!
    2. +4
      24 October 2017 11: 51
      Quote: Stas157
      . which pushes back the intrigue of nominating a pro-government candidate for the deadline.
      Why did the Kremlin decide to maintain the intrigue until the very end? I’ll venture to suggest that the successor scenario is being considered today
      I spoke about this half a year ago. The fact that Putin will run for office as soon as possible! What is this for? It is for intrigue. In order to generate hidden fear in some part of our population, and the uncertainty that Putin may suddenly not become president! That the cry of despair is born: "Putin! Do not leave us !!! Let’s get lost! Orphaned!" ... And then, our chosen one will condescend to the people, will royally declare that he agrees to accept such a heavy burden, once again.

      No, it's easier. It is quite obvious that not only Russia is preparing for the elections in Russia, but also a huge herd of countries of "friends and partners" and their grant-eaters sitting in NGOs like cockroaches in the crevices. Who else but you should know that they never, under any circumstances, "interfered" in the elections of all countries, including Russia. And here, freshly printed American rubles in bags are becoming moldy, non-Russian cockroaches are starving, they don’t know which candidate to "stop" and stagger the boat))) Do you still remember that Russia has the right to cut the number of representatives of American "diplomacy" by 155 goals, as a mirror measure for their pranks regarding Russian diplomacy in the United States. It seems that literally a week before the announcement of the candidate, and maybe a week after, just 155 will fly out that are too diligently preparing for the elections and through which money will go to all kinds of funds working with PARNAS, Yabloko, Civic Platform, Nemtsov Foundation etc. etc. They are already fully registered on sites like "hh" under the pretext of searching and posting vacancies, to obtain databases of legal entities. The preparation of the fifth column is in full swing, but at the same time there is some nervousness due to the fact that the main person against whom they are being prepared does not decide on a decision. So there’s no hurry for us. The bummer must be sensitive.
  13. +1
    24 October 2017 09: 04
    If Putin is not on the lists, I won’t go to the polls. And no "move by the horse" such as self-nomination Sobchak will not make me do it.
    1. +19
      24 October 2017 10: 09
      Quote: Lumumba
      If Putin is not on the lists, I won’t go to the polls.

      And if Putin is on the lists, then there is no need to go! In any case, he will win.
  14. +19
    24 October 2017 09: 05
    And if Putin leaves

    Sepuk then do everything
    Well, or mourn to death
    Nitsche - the Sobchak group will push someone else. Ksenia is on the way wassat
  15. 0
    24 October 2017 09: 05
    Putin must leave. Putin has no right to leave. Both statements are true.
  16. +3
    24 October 2017 09: 17
    only one hitch, age. In the year 24, he will already be under 75 .......... God grant that everything would be fine with his brains. And I think he needs to make such a vertical of power so that under any president the country will be monolithic.
  17. FID
    +14
    24 October 2017 09: 22
    I really, well, ABSOLUTELY dislike the words "elite", "elite" showdowns, etc. .... Translated, "elite" means the best ... Is this who we have - the best? These new billionaires? These new partnomenklatura? Even Rodnina, Tretyak and others like them - THIS IS NOT THE ELITE! It is adherent! They were once the best, and now they are ADDED!
    1. +2
      24 October 2017 12: 37
      Tretyak has a home in the USA. He was the "best" when he was a hockey player. Now look at what he, as an FHR functionary, does with the once-best Russian ice hockey in the world!
  18. 0
    24 October 2017 10: 16
    Quote: siberalt
    But do we not tell fortunes on coffee grounds, who has nothing to do?

    My laptop fell in the process. The morning is. Everyone knows that fortune telling is used in the search for truth. And who has nothing to do? To throw! The method is classified on my part, but there is a red teapot in it. For one and a half seconds of rituals (24 forms of Tai Chi Xuan rest), the conclusions are memorable today. So what to do? The political component is present. Here the cunning plan is clear: money should work! Nuances? Who seeks will always find! Oh, someone will come! Operation!
    1. +3
      24 October 2017 10: 42
      Quote: grandfather Mih
      Quote: siberalt
      But do we not tell fortunes on coffee grounds, who has nothing to do?

      My laptop fell in the process. The morning is. Everyone knows that fortune telling is used in the search for truth. And who has nothing to do? To throw! The method is classified on my part, but there is a red teapot in it. For one and a half seconds of rituals (24 forms of Tai Chi Xuan rest), the conclusions are memorable today. So what to do? The political component is present. Here the cunning plan is clear: money should work! Nuances? Who seeks will always find! Oh, someone will come! Operation!

      Grandfather was smoked ...
  19. +1
    24 October 2017 10: 50
    How many autocrats are here who are ready to vote at the behest of the Kremlin) We don’t need any Kremlin successors, the name and year of my election as president are in my nickname, the new generation is choosing him, Pyyn retired!
    1. 0
      29 October 2017 02: 55
      Quote: Navalny2018
      new generation chooses him

      And what about the “new generation” of which years of birth?
  20. +5
    24 October 2017 10: 51
    My nephew, a young man, lives and works in Moscow, he said, now all of Moscow is against Putin, rallies are held against him every day. That Putin supports the theft of officials and spread rot to his people. It is worth removing it and an idyll will come. This is not the first time I've heard such arguments from young people. When I ask who is your alternative, silence. There is a powerful subversive work on the collapse of Russia and the bringing to power of American vassals, as in the days of the USSR. Young people turn the dirty linen of the Russian elite inside out, give examples of history that are also turned out conveniently and some young people are ready to buzz. There are still many people out of habit looking with delight at the west and America. And they methodically do their job. Protected by the democratic values ​​of American patrons.
    1. +4
      24 October 2017 12: 13
      Quote: russian ivan
      My nephew, a young man, lives and works in Moscow, he said, now all of Moscow is against Putin, rallies are held against him every day. That Putin supports the theft of officials and spread rot to his people. It is worth removing it and an idyll will come. This is not the first time I've heard such arguments from young people. When I ask who is your alternative, silence. There is a powerful subversive work on the collapse of Russia and the bringing to power of American vassals, as in the days of the USSR. Young people turn the dirty linen of the Russian elite inside out, give examples of history that are also turned out conveniently and some young people are ready to buzz. There are still many people out of habit looking with delight at the west and America. And they methodically do their job. Protected by the democratic values ​​of American patrons.

      What a mess in your head. Or are you a provocateur? In your opinion, it turns out the return of Crimea to Russia and the preservation of the Black Sea Fleet in Sevastopol, and not the entry of the American there is the collapse of Russia? But it is precisely the return of Crimea with Sevastopol that is not supported by those who dream that Putin will not become president. And who is working for the collapse of Russia here? Is it not those who are under the protection of American patrons and who have littered the heads of young people who grew up in prosperous Putin times and hopes to seize power on their shoulders and continue this very collapse that Putin prevented the field of the 90s.
      1. +3
        24 October 2017 12: 30
        I am a Muscovite, but who doesn’t ask everyone FOR PUTIN!
      2. The comment was deleted.
    2. +3
      24 October 2017 12: 28
      Do not confuse Moscow with Russia.
    3. +6
      24 October 2017 14: 16
      I will answer you with the words of the ruling elite, deputy Edra, whose “intellectual” ladies criticized her rule regarding the CIA’s hand for all “dissenters” in Russia laughing ) But about the alternative? Do you think that at 20 years of power in Russia did not appear watered by heavyweights is this by chance? The king himself fenced himself with clowns in order not to let a truly strong-willed politician enter the circle of Ur patriots (Not Navalny and other high-ranking)
  21. +1
    24 October 2017 11: 18
    Quote: Stas157
    Quote: Vlad.by
    Well, yes, yes ... one more Yeltsin-Medvedev is needed. Democrat.

    So you yourself answered the question! We don’t need a democrat like Yeltsin and Medvedev! And Putin is just from this visual range. Pure liberal! Therefore, we need another president, socially oriented, against disorder and oligarchs, one that will make Russia strong. And the money will be withdrawn from America, and the ruble will be untied from the dollar. It will cease to drive all raw materials to the west, and the proceeds of money - offshore. ... The list goes on for a very long time!
    Yes, I would even agree to the collective farmer Lukashenko! He is more honest with the people. There is no such rampant oligarchs! Economic...

    or maybe Navalny, this one will “ruin everything” in a moment and return to where we started, by the 90s, but keep in mind that our overseas “friends” will not give us a second chance and the Iraq-Libya-Syria-Ukraine scenario and earlier “plays” 99,9% will be provided with confidence
    1. +8
      24 October 2017 13: 00
      Quote: agel26r
      or maybe Navalny, this one will instantly "ruin" everything and return to where we started, by the 90th

      And why didn’t they immediately offer Ksyusha Sobchak? Then we’ll definitely return to the 90s. Why are you offering liberals? Enough with us and liberal Putin.
      I would suggest the Communists, or from left-wing parties. Glazyev, Boldyrev, Rogozin ...
      1. +1
        25 October 2017 09: 11
        I do not propose Navalny as an option, I want to say that a bird in the hands in the face of the GDP is better than a duck under the bed in the face of a sabote-horse or the persons you proposed. But the Communists had a chance in the 90s, and Zyuganov fumbled, casting his votes to EBN., So that was all over with the Communists. IMHO.
  22. 0
    24 October 2017 12: 00
    There is still a wagon and a small cart before the nomination of the presidential candidate, more than a month, and everyone is already alarmed why Putin is not nominating his candidacy? Yes, because the time has not yet come according to the law. This Yavlinsky, who had been forgotten by everyone, had already reminded himself of himself a year before the election, and Putin should be reminded of himself if the voters see him every day in business on television.
  23. 0
    24 October 2017 12: 09
    I’ll venture to suggest that today the top is considering the scenario "Successor”, Which allows solving a lot of future problems for the country and for President Putin personally.

    ... this person will be with a surname in the first letter "Д".... Yes
    1. +1
      24 October 2017 17: 56
      this person will be with a surname on the first letter "D"
      Give me? Doigou? Sofas? Grandfather?
      1. The comment was deleted.
  24. +1
    24 October 2017 12: 12
    Quote: Stas157
    Quote: Golovan Jack
    ... and then Ostap suffered ...

    You, as always, have unsurpassed argumentation!

    All his argument is not worth a penny, it is not worth paying attention. Adept - he is an adept! wassat
  25. +1
    24 October 2017 12: 22
    Yes, tryndet then in vain ??? ))) Netuti so far places alternatives to okromya Svetlyashchego .... good
    It is enough to look at government meetings - the gray and homogeneous mass that the Maltz’s GDP is fiddling with, and without it, the “Brezhnev stagnation” would have long begun .... laughing
    1. +2
      24 October 2017 17: 58
      stagnation Brezhnevsky
      That is, you prefer not to notice the "Putin stagnation"?
  26. 0
    24 October 2017 12: 29
    If he leaves, then this is a betrayal!
  27. +2
    24 October 2017 12: 29
    Quote: AA17
    According to Credit Suisse estimates, 10% of the richest Russians own 89% of the total wealth of all Russian households, over the year this share increased by 2 percentage points. It is significantly larger than in other large economies, the authors of the review compare: in the USA, 10% of the wealthiest account for 78% of the country's wealth, in China - 73%.

    I am sure that Putin, the GDP, did not strive for such insanity - and he knows that an explosion is really ripening in this delirium. He knows that the Medvedevites-Shuvalovites will bring this explosion. He knows that any explosion in multinational and multiconfessional Russia will surely be damned by the very shaky "EdRo", in which there is no unity in REAL, did not exist and never will be, but there is a temporary alliance of regionally and vertically sucking money and power of the ORGANIZED clans. And not by the rank of sucking! And this insanity by itself does not resolve, it can be somehow ordered ONLY from above and with a STRONG HAND, otherwise a squabble (it’s a revolution) is inevitable. About external "strong greedy hands" you can not even interpret - we all see them. Conclusion - right now, Putin can’t leave. Until he CONSTITUTIONALLY creates at least a collegial replacement for himself. Like the Chinese, for example, where stability is seen, however.
    1. +2
      24 October 2017 14: 58
      Quote: Mikhail Zubkov
      Like the Chinese, for example,

      Thourow Leicester, an American economist and economic adviser to President Johnson, published The Future of Capitalism: How Today's Economic Forces Shape Tomorrow's World in 1996. In one of his chapters, he predicts a bright future for China when the book was written ( 1992-94), this country was still a backward country with uncertain prospects, and not everyone would undertake to make such optimistic prophecies. In describing China, Leicester compares it with the countries of the former USSR (and especially Russia). The American economist shows why Russia and the post-Soviet Socialist Republic as a whole will not succeed in becoming a developed power in the near future, while China, on the contrary, will.

      17 years after the release of Leicester's book, we can make sure that the conclusions of the American economist were correct in this time period. Looking even further, Turrow Leicester was confident that Russia would never succeed in overcoming the role of a global supplier of natural resources. The only thing Russia can hope for and which has not yet happened is its revival as a “grain power”.
      Four main reasons for this Chinese success compared to Eastern Europe.
      First, the Chinese have proven that their still very poor society is able to voluntarily save and, therefore, invest a high percentage of its GDP - about 40%. This means that foreign investment is important, but not inevitable.
      Secondly, China has an effective government that can plan strategies and, having decided on these strategies, can impose them. The transition from communism to capitalism is difficult and cannot be accomplished without an effective government.
      China's third advantage is overseas Chinese. The functions of management are very different under communism and under capitalism. Under communism, managers were essentially quasi-economic economic officials.
      The fourth important advantage of China comes from the fact that only 18% of Chinese people worked in large state enterprises, while in Russia 93% of the population worked in state enterprises. At the same time, 72% of the population in China worked on collective farms, while in the USSR only 6% It is much easier to move the economy of small enterprises towards the market than the economy of large ones.
      Why does China's management system work?
      The system in the PRC is multi-party, and has remained so since 1949 (the date the state was formed). And now, on the eve of the congress, the opinions of other parties on whatever matters were taken into account.

      So, political and ideological atherosclerosis with complete petrification of blood vessels arose in the USSR — this is not the case in China. From what follows a curious conclusion or assumption: if the USSR did not achieve false unanimity and vote in favor, the system could smoothly transform, as happened in China. And even bring the country to the enviable state in which China is now located.
      Further. The congress - like the presidential or parliamentary elections in other countries - is an occasion for a nationwide discussion on key issues, but also he (following the results of discussions) elects the top leadership. Without any constitutions, an explicit system developed: a political bureau changes every 10 years, a top leader also, but with a shift of five years. That is, at the current congress, they will change a considerable part of the political bureau, which took shape under Hu Jiitao, but Xi Jinping will remain and even be able to influence the composition of "his" political bureau. At the same time, it will include an heir, a man who, after a five-year test, will become the head of the party and state in five years. His name is not kept secret. Although, if he does not cope with the probationary period, he will not be elected.
      1. 0
        24 October 2017 15: 14
        Quote: Overlock
        The transition from communism to capitalism is difficult and cannot be accomplished without an effective government.

        Are you sure that in China you’ve lost your mind and are going to switch to the cisystem? You don’t have to repeat the dogma of absolutely mossy Marxists. There isn’t such an aspiration in China and will not be in the foreseeable future, Xi definitely said this.
        Quote: Overlock
        Under communism, managers were essentially quasi-economic economic officials.

        There was no communism anywhere, the 90 phrases that you repeat do not convince you of anything. Then, in 90, we got all our ears, they say officials are evil, and in Russia there are five times more than in the RSFSR and is revered for good .. The question is not the officials of the nomenclature themselves, but the way of controlling it. In China they have such a method. In the Russian Federation. Yes, and in the late USSR, with worse and later, there was no control as such. Especially at the highest level.
        Quote: Overlock
        Why does China's management system work?
        The system in the PRC is multi-party, and has remained so since 1949 (the date the state was formed). And now, on the eve of the congress, the opinions of other parties on whatever matters were taken into account.

        Because the decisions of the CPC are MANDATORY for implementation. The lesson of the USSR by the Chinese is learned correctly.
        Quote: Overlock
        So, political and ideological atherosclerosis with complete petrification of blood vessels arose in the USSR — this is not the case in China. From what follows a curious conclusion or assumption: if the USSR did not achieve false unanimity and vote in favor, the system could smoothly transform, as happened in China.

        A half-truthful conclusion .. "say atherosclerosis2 .. no, not sclerosis. And the cancer of the body that hit the USSR in the form of the highest party nomenclature, intelligentsia and crime, the country that sold it.
        Quote: Overlock
        The congress - like the presidential or parliamentary elections in other countries - is an occasion for a nationwide discussion on key issues, but also he (following the results of discussions) elects the top leadership. Without any constitutions, an explicit system developed: a political bureau changes every 10 years, a top leader also, but with a shift of five years. That is, at the current congress, they will change a considerable part of the political bureau, which took shape under Hu Jiitao, but Xi Jinping will remain and even be able to influence the composition of "his" political bureau. At the same time, it will include an heir, a man who, after a five-year test, will become the head of the party and state in five years. His name is not kept secret. Although, if he does not cope with the probationary period, he will not be elected.

        Here is the lesson of the USSR learned in full, therefore, the dream of supposedly a transition from socialism with Chinese characteristics. In capitalism, there are dreams of mossy dogmatic Marxists who are poorly versed in issues.
        1. +3
          24 October 2017 17: 42
          Quote: Pancir026
          Are you sure that in China you’ve lost your mind and are going to switch to the cisystem? You don’t have to repeat the dogma of absolutely mossy Marxists. There isn’t such an aspiration in China and will not be in the foreseeable future, Xi definitely said this.

          It doesn’t matter what they say, it matters what they do. I am not Xi Jinping, therefore to the original source.
          Xi Jinping, theses:
          1. The course of the Communist Party for the next 5 years will be called "Socialism with Chinese Characteristics for a New Era."

          2. Economic development is the key to solving all the problems of China.
          3. Xiaokan society will be achieved in 2020, China will become a modernized innovative in 2035, a rich and powerful socialist power by 2050.

          4. The realization of the Chinese dream is impossible without peace and development among the neighbors of China. To this end, China is building a “community of shared destiny” and helps neighbors through the Belt and the Way.

          Xi has been speaking for 100 minutes and has never drank water. Iron man, a real communist.

          5. Xi declared the need to internationalize the renminbi, facilitate work for the business, and equal conditions for all market participants.

          6. The liberalization of the economy will continue; rollback, as some feared, does not seem to be

          7. Chinese socialist democracy is the most advanced democratic system in the world, Xi Jinping is convinced.

          8. We need to “be afraid of any attempts to introduce Western-style democracy,” to develop intra-party democracy and grassroots political participation.

          9. China will create “research centers of a new type with Chinese characteristics” that will not seek to replicate Western methods.

          10. The army will be modernized in 2035 and will become the strongest in the world by 2050.

          11. The current military reform is a planned rather than emergency preparation for war.

          12. Since the advent of socialism with Chinese characteristics in the new era, the contradiction between the ever-growing needs of the people for a beautiful life and uneven and incomplete development has already become the main contradiction of Chinese society
          1. 0
            1 February 2018 19: 04
            Thank you for the political information. My old man began to go blind, and so that I do not completely kill my eyes with a tablet, I collect and print newsletter political digests for him in a week

            But Passaran! stop
    2. +7
      24 October 2017 18: 00
      Medvedevts-Shuvalovtsy
      Where are you coming from? Medvedev and Shuvalov are worthy adherents of Putinism. And then he first put them on his own, and now he allegedly cannot deal with them? Kindergarten. Those to whom he was imposed, he removed in the second term.
  28. +2
    24 October 2017 12: 32
    Quote: russian ivan
    My nephew, a young man, lives and works in Moscow, he said, now all of Moscow is against Putin, rallies are held against him every day. That Putin supports the theft of officials and spread rot to his people. It is worth removing it and an idyll will come. This is not the first time I've heard such arguments from young people. When I ask who is your alternative, silence. There is a powerful subversive work on the collapse of Russia and the bringing to power of American vassals, as in the days of the USSR. Young people turn the dirty linen of the Russian elite inside out, give examples of history that are also turned out conveniently and some young people are ready to buzz. There are still many people out of habit looking with delight at the west and America. And they methodically do their job. Protected by the democratic values ​​of American patrons.


    Your nephew is probably sitting on the spice ...)))

    URGENTLY pick it up from Moscow !!!!
    1. +6
      24 October 2017 14: 49
      in vain you are so. There are no rallies against, but among many of my friends there are such moods. One retirement hopes that in the new term, GDP will restore order. I ask, who prevented him from doing this at that time, when after Crimea he had an undeniable mandate from the whole country? The answer is silence.
      1. +2
        24 October 2017 16: 00
        Quote: Overlock
        I ask, who prevented him from doing this at that time, when after Crimea he had an undeniable mandate from the whole country? The answer is silence.

        Studying the materials of the XIX Congress, I saw there (among other things) a very clear signal that it would be necessary to tie up with all kinds of ideas about Western democracy in China.
        But immediately the question arises: what in our country? And in our country, as we know, at the same time as the XIX Party Congress, the famous Valdai Club took place. You need to understand that since the main "programmer" of the Valdai Club, that is, the organization that determines the topics and participants, was the Higher School of Economics, there is no reason to expect that something unexpectedly interesting could have arisen in the discussion process. The only thing that could be fundamentally important there was Putin’s speech.
        https://cont.ws/@cg/749355
  29. 0
    24 October 2017 12: 34
    Quote: three-track
    If he leaves, then this is a betrayal!



    And that’s true .... if you blame it, then in the bold 00s, but now it’s impossible .... hi
  30. +1
    24 October 2017 12: 37
    Quote: Gardamir
    I did not promise. But the fact that Ms. Nabiullina again transferred billions of dollars to America in August is a fact.

    In your opinion, China, which poured a trillion into the USA, is also fools? That is, China, getting profit from investments, is this normal, but we just feed America? Logic however ...
  31. 0
    24 October 2017 12: 43
    Yes, Ksyusha is his successor. To the decks.
  32. +4
    24 October 2017 12: 51
    As children honestly) do not you already think that they will ever give up power to the people)))
  33. +1
    24 October 2017 12: 54
    Quote: staviator
    Quote: Gardamir
    I did not promise. But the fact that Ms. Nabiullina again transferred billions of dollars to America in August is a fact.

    In your opinion, China, which poured a trillion into the USA, is also fools? That is, China, getting profit from investments, is this normal, but we just feed America? Logic however ...


    China repays debts, since it was poured much more, creating industrial potential and endowing it with technology ...)))

    And we yes - just stupidly sponsor the enemy ...)))

    If you do not understand this - do not write heresy ...)))
  34. +7
    24 October 2017 12: 59
    It is possible to raise the standard of living even with the current incomes of the country, it is only necessary to reduce the RFP to people who are pushing the "people's" heritage. In all areas. At the salary of several 10 people from the top management of the oil and gas industry, pensions can already be raised. And how many forests are being pushed illegally? If you cut a Christmas tree for yourself for the New Year, they will surely find it and they will come for a fine (I’m not a supporter of living cuts, but for example), so can they really see the disappearance of hectares? Everyone sees. It turns out that with tacit consent everything is done.

    You look at the thieves to snuggle up and would heal humanly, when the "popular" quotes would be lost.

    Since the “review” here is still “military,” I will also go through the military-industrial complex.

    To draw "concerns". They organized feeders for the close ones, and the factories in the regions were engaged in the production as well as in the production. Only now, most of the profits are given higher. And then we are surprised that young people are not striving for factories. Especially in the engineer.
    Engineers used to get fewer locksmiths, but now it’s much easier for a technician to earn 35-40 after a techie, without thinking about what and why you are turning it, than trying to do it for 5 years, so that for 20-25 an engineer thinks how to mold candy with limited resources and development timelines at time supply of domestic pci in half a year and sky-high prices. And this is a FACT, and not fabrications, for he himself from the provinces and the settlement sheets of his acquaintances saw ...

    According to bulk and co (last name with a little intentionally) - this offended man, who was simply not allowed to go to the common feeding trough, has so many logical holes in his own program that he is either stupid himself, which is unlikely, or the potential electorate is not so respected that keeps idiots. What is the worst, whether in money or otherwise, but he is promoting among young people a course towards essentially a revolution from below. DO NOT SUCH US. Because as a result of it, at the moment, other faces will just crawl out, but with the same goals - to warm your hands. Moreover, they will justify the deterioration of life "well, so the revolution is, we are raking after the old thieves, there is no money, but you are holding on."

    The problem is that in order for the existing government to move, we need a normal opposition, with real support from a substantial part of the population. If they had not won, but the existing government would have thought, would have begun to work.

    So far, the authorities in general have NO anyone socially oriented to vote for him. Pocket Opposition? Give up. Bulk? He is focused on himself. There was Prokhorov. It seems that there is already money, maybe it would work out, but the people did not believe it, although of course the vote count is also a good question ...

    If this socially oriented candidate had appeared, he would have become akin to Che, only without shooting. The people from above could support the revolution from above. Make this candidate? AS? I have no answer yet.

    ps Can the whole pocket opposition take up their hands, unite, choose a relatively young candidate and try to combine their interest in a more substantial "amount"? But no one will take such a step. Do not agree.
  35. The comment was deleted.
  36. +1
    24 October 2017 13: 08
    This party has already sufficiently discredited itself, as well as the entire indoor opposition and other parishioners of the alcohol center, which I do not consider to be patriots of the Russian Federation.
  37. 0
    24 October 2017 13: 14
    Quote: 100502
    As children honestly) do not you already think that they will ever give up power to the people)))


    Do not ... well, someday, purely hypothetically .... they will give way .... when everyone will fall apart and pull it apart, then say: "Now, take it, pick yourself ..." laughing
  38. +1
    24 October 2017 13: 48
    When, at last, truly democratic elections will be held here, without any “receivers”. People should choose, not be sheep .... Give Putin a break !!!
    1. +5
      24 October 2017 14: 36
      And who should you choose if the elective field has long been cleared and more than one bastard already has a bright face that cannot overshadow?
  39. +7
    24 October 2017 14: 21
    Quote: russian ivan
    That Putin supports the theft of officials and spread rot to his people.

    what is wrong? in Serdyukov and Vasilyeva? In a state of health?
  40. 0
    24 October 2017 14: 48
    A successor (and preferably not one) should be ready at any time, and this is one of the main state institutions. A successor is one who ensures the continuity of the survival course.
  41. +1
    24 October 2017 14: 58
    After all, we have Ksyusha Sobchak !!! wassat lol
  42. 0
    24 October 2017 16: 23
    Quote: Alexsin
    What nonsense did you write? Read carefully. It is about the need for patriotic education of youth. Those who are under the protection of American patrons are working on the collapse of Russia. Work is ongoing on our youth in terms of educating anti-Russian rhetoric to overthrow the existing government. I personally know a lot of young people who consider the return of Crimea and Sevastopol illegal. This is unacceptable.
  43. +3
    24 October 2017 17: 13
    The "successor" is Kudrin. Putin hinted at him.
    In short, the awl changes to soap. The people need to read "The Adventures of Cipollino" in order to know the development of the situation in the country after the election.
  44. +3
    24 October 2017 17: 49
    Quote: Alexsin
    But it is precisely the return of Crimea with Sevastopol that is not supported by those who dream that Putin will not become president

    Are you sure about that? Is one contrary to the second? For example, I say: "Thank you, Vladimir Vladimirovich, for the Crimea! But for domestic politics, it’s not good!"
  45. +4
    24 October 2017 18: 05
    Putin will come, Putin will leave! What's the difference! Neoliberals rule the country, coupled with the oligarchy! We need a person who can rebuild the socio-political formation that exists in Russia on a more acceptable for the people. And will it be Putin or Pupkin, question forty-fifth.
    1. +1
      24 October 2017 19: 27
      Such a person is - this is Navalny. Yes I know Pts not a popular character here
      1. +1
        25 October 2017 09: 45
        :-) Bulk-personality! Do not make me laugh. This is just a Kremlin doll.
  46. +4
    24 October 2017 19: 28
    Analytics, however ... wink .... Especially amused the "reason" of the "slowdown" of the nomination ...
    The machine for transferring the national wealth of Russia to the accounts of "world shareholders" works without failures. When political strategists finish the “project”, .. the “electorate” will be declared a “non-monarch” will. Putin-Neputin ...- only the set of letters in the news will really change
  47. +9
    24 October 2017 20: 54
    He won’t leave anywhere ... And apart from rearranging “furniture”, he won’t change anything. Because it would mean to recognize oneself as a poor builder. There were years with fat oil prices - he reigned lying on his side, sometimes flying with cranes or diving under the water for amphorae ... Of course. Something and the population got from the money rivers, the rest was simply plundered by elites and elites. I didn’t bother with either the defense industry or import substitution ... Paid Kremlin chambers in the TV box explained that it’s so good - we have everything and what’s not - it’s more profitable to buy on the side than to do it ourselves. It then started to fuss when the "staring" from the World puppeteers got tired and demanded to vacate their place ... By this time the world prices for raw materials had fallen, and it turned out that there was no money either ... Throwing and vanity started here, I recalled the slogan about patriotism and the hostile environment, and for the defense industry I had to grab for import substitution ... And of course, they began to inspire the population with a tale of a good king and bad boyars. Yes, even frighten by returning to the days of the Alkash of All Russia, which does not prevent the very top to open this Alkasha - "Yeltsin centers" with speeches and tears. In general, the tsar will not go anywhere ... And the script for the next term has already been written, we will watch, they will not announce it to the audience in advance ...
  48. 0
    24 October 2017 21: 23
    The other day, Vladimir Putin turned 65 years old.

    Captain obvious laughing
    If we go for the next term, then at 71 he will leave the presidency, and everyone will understand that this is forever.

    And what, Putin will disappear, dissolve?
    It is naive. Nothing prevents him from becoming prime minister (see Berlusconi), and then honorary president and mentor.
    And no one will mind.
    1. 0
      24 October 2017 21: 34
      Putin is likely to take over the prime minister’s chair again. And there on the side who will be the president.
  49. +3
    24 October 2017 21: 30
    And no one will tell where in general the members of such a party work? Probably only within the MKAD. But in Soviet times, I myself was a candidate for the Communist Party, my grandfather and uncles with aunts. In short, a representative of this party could be found in any family. And these, who, with the bear on the flag, seized power and are now milking all of Russia. Yes, and scoff at breadwinners. Either one ghoul will say that “there are 35 million superfluous in the country”, then the “little” one will say that they keep and continue to pay taxes, wishing good luck in this matter. And before the heap, the main one said that "teachers can go into business if their salary doesn’t get tired" ..
  50. +5
    24 October 2017 23: 34
    What is all this to us? With a calculated / democratic transfer of power, nothing but portraits in other rooms will change. Even if (suddenly!) A certain other team comes to power, the main thing will remain - capitalism, the "golden calf", profit.
    1. +2
      25 October 2017 00: 29
      In fact, we never had capitalism and, most likely, will not. Strange as it may seem, it must also be built, like socialism for centuries. To accustom people to saving, entrepreneurship, high productivity (in cap countries it is above all a fact). To innovations and technologies (cap of the country and this is ahead). Yes, money is the main thing, but they know how to count and never ward off the Olympics without any subsequent benefits. So, our system (the gangster oligarchy) has not yet been called capitalism. Yes, maybe we don’t need this ...
  51. +4
    25 October 2017 00: 20
    The main question is how to avoid The Hague and, in fact, subsequent trials in Mother Russia itself. And not only to him, but to the entire gang of thieves. And they broke a lot of wood...
  52. +1
    25 October 2017 01: 22
    Quote: To be or not to be
    At the crossing of horses do not change

    This is what Mikhail Ulyanov said at the Congress of USSR Deputies in defense of Gorbaty. What did this villain do then?
  53. 0
    25 October 2017 03: 28
    Quote: nadezhiva
    Quote: silver_roman
    You are right indeed, it is necessary to change. But to remove one and put another judge is not an option.
    The Kremlin can always make a knight's move. For the presidency - Shoigu (for example), for the premieres - of Putin, with the transfer of certain functions to the prime minister. And you think someone will blather? So, jokes will poison. Maximum. Liberals are crying, of course, but who will worry about them?


    A good option, by the way, is with Shoigu. There are a lot of comments, but not on the topic of the article.
  54. +1
    25 October 2017 03: 37
    If Putin makes a cunning move and pushes Medvedev into the presidency again, then I will agree with the communists that the Americans bought Putin!
  55. 0
    25 October 2017 04: 06
    Quote: russian ivan
    Now all of Moscow is against Putin,

    Interesting figures from the past - “Elections in Moscow on March 4, 2012.”
    For the first time in post-Soviet times, a candidate from the ruling party did not receive more than half of the votes participating in the elections in the capital. Vladimir Putin, who won the 2012 Russian presidential election in the first round, also received fewer votes than Dmitry Medvedev in 2008 and Putin himself in 2004. On March 4, 2012, 1,99 million ballots for Putin were found in the ballot boxes in Moscow; on March 2, 2008, 3,28 million votes for Medvedev, i.e. 1,29 million votes or 40% less than Medvedev. In Moscow, 2004% of the capital's residents voted for Putin in 68,6, 2008% of Muscovites voted for Medvedev in 71,5, and in 2012 only 46,95% of votes were cast for Putin. Muscovites voted for the second round of elections. Since V.V. Putin announced his intention to run for a third term, his victory was facilitated by:

    - secret filtering of nominated candidates for President of the Russian Federation at the stage of their registration;

    - 10-fold leadership on air (television and radio) and avoidance of personal participation in pre-election debates;

    - distancing himself from the United Russia party, in which he is the leader, and leaving the All-Russian Popular Front (ONF). Adopting as the main idea of ​​the campaign the fight against the “Orange Revolution” and the enemies of the people, among whom are all those who are for fair and just elections;

    - inaction of election commissions, courts, prosecutors and investigators in their response to violations of electoral legislation reported by citizens and parties;

    - influence of the executive power through budget-dependent enterprises, incl. non-state, on voters and election organizers, the use of administrative resources. According to official data, in all constituent entities of the Russian Federation, candidate for President of Russia Vladimir Putin took first place in the voting results. At the same time, in five subjects (the Chechen Republic, the Republic of Dagestan, the Republic of Tyva, the Republic of Ingushetia, the Karachay-Cherkess Republic) Putin collected over 90% of the votes.
    Only in Moscow did Putin fail to overcome the 50% barrier and gained 46,95% of the votes
  56. +2
    25 October 2017 12: 15
    Quote: silver_roman
    Population incomes grow due to economic growth

    Then, from what hangover do the incomes of millionaires in Russia constantly grow? The economy is growing - the economy is not growing, the population is impoverished - and the faces of the fat cats are so swollen that they no longer fit into the budget bowl...
  57. +2
    25 October 2017 12: 21
    Quote: Overlock
    At the same time, in five subjects (the Chechen Republic, the Republic of Dagestan, the Republic of Tyva, the Republic of Ingushetia, the Karachay-Cherkess Republic) Putin collected over 90% of the votes.

    Now it’s clear why 90% of the Russian budget money goes to such entities!
    The “thank you” government tells its loyal vassals... “not to be confused with the residents of these regions”...
  58. +1
    25 October 2017 16: 06
    Quote: S-Kerrigan
    And how many more millennia do you think people should squabble over scraps of territory, swear because “he is an Arab, not a Russian” or “blacks, I hate them more than Latinos”? Why do we need to cling to such atavisms as “the uniqueness of an ethnic group”? Why the hell is this necessary?

    As long as civilization will exist. The number of available resources is always fixed. And you can increase your own well-being only by reducing someone else’s. An alternative is leveling using the Pol Pot method.
    Quote: S-Kerrigan
    By the way, we have an entire solar system idle there! But with this, if we don’t erase all boundaries to hell, problems will arise - in the not so distant future, we, the developers of advanced systems (modern engineers), will achieve the point that someone will still be able to break in and “capture the moon”/" Mars". They will take it and declare it their territory (what they will do there is another question... they will stupidly stake it out). Will this benefit us, the inhabitants of the Earth? Won't this add friction?

    I thought such space fantasies were a thing of the last century. For the next couple of hundred years, exploration of the solar system is technically impossible. And then... What will you do with radiation? Only the Earth has a magnetic field. So manned astronautics will be limited to the Earth-Moon system. Robots may be able to mine the asteroid belt when it becomes cost-effective to do so, and explore distant planets. All! The rest is fantastic!
    Quote: S-Kerrigan
    We need to move away from the concept of “my state”. It’s time to stop being a child and still consider the whole Earth your home - then your attitude towards the planet as a whole will change (otherwise I’ve already seen the wildest nonsense about the same Grand Canyon a thousand times, that it’s crap... and only because that he is in the USA. This is the brightest "pan head").

    A natural question arises: who is the boss in the house? I take it Katz is offering to surrender?
    Quote: S-Kerrigan
    And yes, the fate of all humanity is more important than those who could not adapt (I’m talking about Detroit) - always and at all times there have been/will be those for whom it’s time to crawl to the bottom/cemetery. First of all, you must be honest with yourself. This is natural selection and the evolution of society.

    Oh, how it smelled like Nazism. Yes, my friend, you contradict yourself)))
    Quote: S-Kerrigan
    In short, all this (similar to your calls) looks like the desire to “not change anything” / “to preserve the current state of affairs forever and ever”. Just one-on-one, like the United States you hate. They also dream of a "end of story."

    Hmmm... You have absolutely no understanding of the issue. The “end of history” is precisely the cessation of the existence of national states and a “one world” under the leadership of an international (conditionally) oligarchy...
  59. +1
    26 October 2017 11: 06
    Shalomov can be replaced, but not by David Mendel and others similar in origin.
  60. 0
    26 October 2017 11: 34
    The author did not consider the most likely scenario, I will call it “Yeltsin’s”. Those. Putin goes to the polls, wins them, and a year or two later announces his resignation and appointment as acting. President and Prime Minister followed by the election of him as President. Therefore, I propose to carefully monitor the personality of the future prime minister - then it will be clear whether Putin is using this scenario.
  61. 0
    26 October 2017 21: 47
    Somehow it seems to me that Shoigu will be made president, and VVP will be the chairman of the government. And this will be an ironclad option.
  62. 0
    27 October 2017 09: 52
    As we understand, Vladimir Putin cannot rule the country forever. Sooner or later he will have to leave, and in Russia the question will arise: what to do next? It is clear that to live, but how? Over the past almost 20 years, everyone has become accustomed to, that Russia has a pivot that can do everything, knows everything, has 20 tricky plans for all occasions, etc.


    Of course, very strong words are said about the core that can do everything, knows everything. At least in the economy and industry, “20 cunning plans” are not visible, and there are big problems with demographics; there are “no bright stars in the team surrounding the president,” hence the problems of the “successor.”
    And regarding the “successor” operation, why offer such difficulties? Well, VVP will serve one more presidential term, and then work, steer, handle the Prime Minister until they reach the Kremlin wall, what’s the problem?
  63. 0
    27 October 2017 17: 26
    Well, if a currency prostitute nominates herself for president, then the choice is rich... drinks
  64. 0
    27 October 2017 18: 38
    Quote: S-Kerrigan
    And how many more millennia do you think people should squabble over scraps of territory, swear because “he is an Arab, not a Russian” or “blacks, I hate them more than Latinos”?
    ...
    In short, all this (similar to your calls) looks like the desire to “not change anything” / “to preserve the current state of affairs forever and ever”. Just one-on-one, like the United States you hate. They also dream of a "end of story."

    There is such a boring science as biology. And everything listed is a consequence of the fact that humanity is a biological species, which contains certain instincts of behavior. And no intelligence has any influence on this, just like the level of scientific and technological revolution, that is, with all our airplanes and computers, in essence, we are no different from those people who lived in ancient Egypt or Rome.
    It's cynical, unpleasant, rude, but that's life.
    Do you want to change the world? Then take the clay (monkey) and mold (evolve) a new person. If you can. If not, then there is no need for loud slogans that lead nowhere. The example of the USSR is before our eyes.
  65. 0
    28 October 2017 00: 26
    Gransasso,
    Seriously?...don’t remind me what happened to the “gray mice” from Stalin’s entourage?...Trotsky, Bukharin, Zinoviev, Kamenev...

    The listed comrades were not Stalin’s entourage, but Lenin’s entourage; for Stalin they were rivals
  66. 0
    28 October 2017 11: 37
    Quote: Alexander S
    The main question is how to avoid The Hague and, in fact, subsequent trials in Mother Russia itself. And not only to him, but to the entire gang of thieves. And they broke a lot of wood...

    As Woland said: This is the main question!
    Now in the Kremlin, and in other secluded places in Russia, “effectively round-the-clock managers” are sitting in the Radon pose and only one question torments them: How can I change everything without changing anything???
    Putin hasn’t done anything for a long time. And he just makes small, crooked remarks!...Are you being rude to us all over our faces? And we respond - Yaroslavna’s cry, how the West bitterly deceived us... what a sad thing! And then they deceived us and then too... but when we get together, it’s like an instant mirror... but not suddenly... not suddenly!
    All this looks like the lamentations of the Bad Boy: I’m your... bourgeoisie - where are you going???
  67. 0
    29 October 2017 22: 19
    Vlad.by,
    I am also not interested in your opinion.
  68. 0
    31 January 2018 17: 35
    Quote: Vlad.by
    Oleg Tolstoy October 24, 2017
    I still did not understand what they wanted to say?
    What does Russia follow its own interests in preferential deliveries? Or, again, about the fact that in Russia everyone is stealing?
    Incidentally, from the point of view of the "bridgehead covering Northern Europe" - so it is more like a bone in the throat, not a bridgehead. Don’t place a base, don’t put Iskanders with Russian crews ... But there is no faith in the fact that someone from Lukashenko’s team in dugouts will lie under NATO tanks - sorry.
    National Belarusian idea - give more money, but for free!


    So read it again.. I am many years old and in the 90s I worked at a company where many of the then political heavyweights of the Russian Federation visited.. They received money from the Republic of Belarus for political lobbying for “friendship” between our countries, a union state and the absence of a customs border. "Prodexpo" is the grandfather of all current Belarusian mussels, citrus fruits and grapes on Russian shelves..

    Belarus has been receiving money all this time, but not for free, but for the creeping privatization of Belarusian “chips”, compliance with the status quo of Russian shareholders in the Belarusian oil industry, potassium and nitrogen, and the necessary vote in the UN.. In addition, all this time we have been fulfilling the role of an offshore for secret transit operations to the West and third countries..

    And as for the “military bridgehead”, the absence of NATO tanks and American aircraft at the exit from the Suwalki corridor in Baranovichi and Lida is also worth something.. The whole LDPR and Crimean upheaval arose not only because of the Surgut pipe and shale gas in Slavyansk but also in order to prevent organized military contingents of a potential enemy from getting within 10 minutes of flight time from the southern underbelly of Russia
  69. 0
    1 February 2018 18: 52
    Quote: panzerfaust
    When, at last, truly democratic elections will be held here, without any “receivers”. People should choose, not be sheep .... Give Putin a break !!!


    Can you trust such a thing to these people? How will he prove that he is the PEOPLE, and not the population? laughing

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"