South Korean opposition intends to persuade US to return tactical nuclear weapons to country

21
The leader of the opposition Korean Freedom Party Hon Yong Pye went to the USA on Monday, where he will try to convince the country's leadership to deploy tactical nuclear weapons in South Korea weapon. About this he wrote on his page on the social network Facebook before flying to Washington.

Today I am going to the United States. During my stay in Washington, I will inform the US representatives about what the South Koreans are thinking about the North Korean nuclear problem, of which 50 million citizens of our country remain hostages
- it is said in the publication Hong Yong Pye. He noted that during the visit he will "seek to deploy American nuclear weapons in South Korea."

South Korean opposition intends to persuade US to return tactical nuclear weapons to country


During the five-day trip, the opposition leader will hold meetings with senior US government officials, members of Congress, and reputable experts. His performances at universities and interviews with American media are planned.

The United States exported tactical nuclear weapons from the Republic of Korea in the early 1990s. Recently, however, in the country more and more calls have been made for his return to the country to deter the DPRK, which is successfully developing its nuclear missile program. Nevertheless, the governments of the United States and South Korea have so far opposed this move.

According to the latest polls, about 60% of South Koreans support the idea of ​​deploying American nuclear weapons in the country, reports TASS.

  • http://imhotour.ru/
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

21 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +6
    23 October 2017 12: 50
    Thus causing the fire of the northern neighbor on itself.
    A wonderful way to resolve the "Korean Question" is to put the peninsula under destruction and there is no problem ...
    1. +9
      23 October 2017 12: 57
      Libera, it is in Korea - Libera ... And strives to move the country to death .....
      1. +2
        23 October 2017 13: 02
        Quote: Solomon Kane
        Libera, it is in Korea - Libera ... And strives to move the country to death .....

        Yes, here the fault of liberalism is that they yap according to the written. Well, very deeply I doubt that personally Cree needs it ... what
        1. +13
          23 October 2017 13: 07
          Worse than a liberal - narrow-eyed liberal!
          Baltic States reminds. There the whole country is dancing to the striped tune ...
          1. +4
            23 October 2017 13: 16
            Yeah, and the self-preservation instinct is strewn with a thick bundle of green candy wrappers.
          2. +2
            23 October 2017 13: 17
            Quote: Logall
            Worse than a liberal - narrow-eyed liberal!
            Baltic States reminds. There the whole country is dancing to the striped tune ...

            So am I about the same ...
        2. +1
          23 October 2017 13: 20
          Quote: NIKNN
          Well, very deeply I doubt that personally Cree needs it ...


          Mattresses will be happy to give them nuclear weapons.

          War and Matrassia have nothing to do with it!
    2. +1
      23 October 2017 13: 00
      Even if they have a suicide and activates at least one charge will go to everyone. Including us. The more weapons, the less predictable the future.
    3. +4
      23 October 2017 13: 06
      "Lying, lying and will lick from the USA!" - It turns out in Korea, this is the main slogan of the opposition ... laughing
      But to be serious, GDP was correctly noted at the Valdai Forum - does hell know what the DPRK has there? And the first, in the case of the return of the TNW, the southern brothers will die, they will die in large numbers ... But the opposition apparently thinks to sit out overseas ... "Good" position!
    4. 0
      23 October 2017 13: 33
      And so they do not cause it? In any mess, a blow will come in South Korea. A logical desire to balance the odds. But I think the US is easier to strike with strategists than to place China there as a tease.
      1. +1
        23 October 2017 14: 28
        Quote: spirit
        But I think the US is easier to strike with strategists

        Or from strategists, or from the same aircraft carriers, or from other American warships, which in that region are already like dirt, not to mention American military bases, which are not the same there .. In a word, the US nuclear weapons there enough. It is not at all clear why asking for a nuclear bomb in your “apartment”. Indeed, the task of any liberal opposition is to do everything to destroy his country.
        1. +1
          23 October 2017 20: 48
          It is not at all clear why asking for a nuclear bomb in your “apartment”.

          “Magomed, is a nuclear bomb expensive?”
          "Very expensive! Many millions of dollars!"
          - Oh! I wish I fell into the garden! laughing
  2. +5
    23 October 2017 12: 56
    will try to convince the country's leadership to deploy tactical nuclear weapons in South Korea

    The South Korean "opposition" is very similar to ours - all in the interests of the United States and to the detriment of its country. Obviously the same "intellectuals" and "builders" of the new society.
    1. +5
      23 October 2017 13: 16
      Quote: rotmistr60
      Obviously the same "intellectuals" and "builders" of the new society.

      Or pathological lovers of voiced coin.
  3. +4
    23 October 2017 13: 02
    probably we won’t see the Korean peninsula on the map soon, for some reason sorry Samsung
    1. 0
      23 October 2017 14: 31
      All Samsung, has long been manufactured in China, in the sense of electronics. But here are the world's largest shipyards in Samsung, and may "suffer."
  4. 0
    23 October 2017 13: 30
    Such is the opposition. Feeding.
  5. 0
    23 October 2017 14: 29
    The United States exported tactical nuclear weapons from the Republic of Korea in the early 1990s.

    1. So all the same, tactical nuclear weapons beat in the South Caucasus, when it did not hit the DPRK.
    2. US nuclear weapons could always be located on the borders of the DPRK outside the territory of the South Caucasus. So the threat to the DPRK remained the same.
    3. The goals for the tactical nuclear weapons of the DPRK are much larger and better.
  6. 0
    23 October 2017 15: 13
    In each country, the Americans have bred their "bitch children," ready to sell their mother for the interests of American corporations.
  7. 0
    23 October 2017 20: 49
    You can ask not only the United States, but the DPRK. After all, a market economy. Who will be able to deliver faster? Eun or Trump?
  8. +1
    24 October 2017 20: 10
    What, decided to shoot yourself?

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"