The Ministry of Defense received the second this year, the regiment of ZRS C-400

44
As part of the commitments on the state defense order, the Almaz-Antey concern prematurely handed over to the Russian Defense Ministry another regiment of the Triumph C-400 anti-aircraft missile system, the concern’s press service reported on Monday.

The Ministry of Defense received the second this year, the regiment of ZRS C-400




Concern VKO "Almaz - Antey" handed over to the Ministry of Defense of Russia the second in 2017 year regimental set ZRS C-400 "Triumph". The ceremony took place on the territory of the Kapustin Yar test site in the Astrakhan region. Acceptance tests were successful
- the report says.

SAM S-400 "Triumph" is designed to protect against shock aviationstrategic, cruise, tactical, and operational-tactical ballistic missiles, as well as medium-range ballistic missiles in combat and electronic countermeasures.

We remind you that in the past, 2016, the Almaz-Antey concern, delivered five C-400 ZRS regiments.
44 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +9
    23 October 2017 11: 20
    Another plus in the air defense of our state.
    1. +6
      23 October 2017 11: 22
      By 2020, they planned to have 56 divisions.
      1. +4
        23 October 2017 11: 25
        Considering that at the beginning of the year there were 38 + 2 regiments of 2 each - this is 42. I don’t remember any plans, but probably 4-5 regiments will be transferred this year.
        1. +3
          23 October 2017 12: 29
          One of the regiments in Kamchatka has three divisions. So the total number of divisions is 43
      2. +3
        23 October 2017 14: 13
        Any doubts? Already 42 divisions are deployed.
        1. +1
          23 October 2017 17: 08
          And how much does it take? I have less distance to the Kim Jong All-Korea training ground than to Vladivostok. But:
          “The most modern weapons of Russia are now located in the Golden Valley,” General Strizhak emphasizes. “This is the S-400 air defense system with a full regiment. By the way, the same regiments cover only the Moscow Region and Kamchatka, and deploy one more on the Kola Peninsula.”
          http://vladnews.ru/3650/sluzhu-otechestvu/vladivo
          stok-prikryt-nadezhno-kak-moskva.html
          This is calming smile
    2. +3
      23 October 2017 11: 36
      There is a plus sign .. Only here are how many holes after the 90s .. And how many plus signs are needed ...
      Quote: Alexey-74
      Another plus in the air defense of our state.
      1. +1
        23 October 2017 13: 29
        Quote: 210ox
        There is a plus sign .. Only here are how many holes after the 90s .. And how many plus signs are needed ...


        They will do as much as necessary - the main thing is to catch it!
  2. +2
    23 October 2017 11: 23
    We remind you that in 2016 Almaz-Antey Concern will supply five regiments of C-400 air defense systems.

    I didn’t understand anything ... what article from 2015 or what? what
    1. +4
      23 October 2017 11: 25
      Quote: The same LYOKHA
      I didn’t understand anything ...

      Second in the calendar year
    2. +3
      23 October 2017 11: 26
      Pies bake very quickly laughing seems to be a typo.
  3. Ren
    +1
    23 October 2017 11: 25
    Is that news from the past? Outside is the end of 2017.
    We remind you that 2016 Almaz-Antey Concern will supply five regiments of C-400 air defense systems.
  4. +2
    23 October 2017 11: 27
    It seems that they turned on the machine for copying "Triumphs" - a 3D printer ...
    1. +5
      23 October 2017 11: 28
      Just opened last year add. production in the Lower.
    2. +4
      23 October 2017 11: 28
      Antey built a new plant just under them

      General Director of Almaz-Anteya: 74 billion invested in the construction of new plants


      more than $ 1 good amount
      1. +3
        23 October 2017 11: 36
        Quote: s-t Petrov
        Antey built a new plant just under them

        Quote: s-t Petrov
        more than $ 1 good amount

        they opened it in Nizhny Novgorod, and the average salary at the plant is 25 ..... somehow hard workers do not indulge denyushki ..... they seem to work for the good of the Motherland .....
      2. +4
        23 October 2017 12: 32
        One S-400 division is sold abroad at a price of $ 500 million. So count how the investments paid off. S-400 purchases China, India, Vietnam. Egypt, Turkey and Saudi Arabia are gathering.
        1. 0
          23 October 2017 14: 19
          to calculate how it paid off - you need to know its cost, plus a billion investments and see what's on the exhaust

          and the average salary at the plant is 25


          the lab scientist gets a little more. This is sad yes. But I think the program will be adopted sooner or later - and there will be the same increase as the military

  5. +7
    23 October 2017 11: 35
    Something turns out rubbish. If they delivered the 2nd S-400 complex this year, and in 2016 (there may be a typo, and this is for 2017), five complexes should be delivered. For the remaining two months, they will definitely not receive anything. Nonsense is complete.
  6. +2
    23 October 2017 11: 36
    I would like to have such an umbrella around the perimeter of the country, because Americans can bullet their axes from the Black Sea, for example, through Astrakhan along the Volga through the petrochemical and chemical industries of the Urals and the Volga region or from the terra. Georgia’s waters have a maximum distance of 2100 km, as far as I remember, this underbelly of our homeland is not covered. In Udmurtia, for example, it is full of defense industry enterprises and they are also under the gun. Of course it’s foolish to assume that all 70 berks will enter the Black Sea, but 100 axes from two destroyers can do a lot of trouble ... the most long-range ax hits 2500. Of course, we have air defense systems and aviation in the Crimea, but still I would like to know am i protected
    1. +2
      23 October 2017 12: 06
      Quote: Maratyurist
      Still, I would like to know I'm protected?

      Here, on the site, there is a good analysis "The current state of the Russian air defense system", though two years ago:
      https://topwar.ru/70364-sovremennoe-sostoya...pvo
      -rossii.html
    2. 0
      23 October 2017 12: 08
      I would like to have such an umbrella around the perimeter of the country, because Americans can bullet their axes from the Black Sea, for example, through Astrakhan along the Volga through the petrochemical and chemical industries of the Urals and the Volga region or from the terra. waters of Georgia, the distance 2100 km maximum, as far as I remember, this underbelly of our homeland is not covered.

      apparently you are not familiar ....
      S-400 air defense systems are air defense industrial areas
      and Axes will initially run into:
      1. VKS fighter aircraft
      2. SAM S-300В4, SAM Buk, SAM Tor, SAM Osa, Tunguska SAM
      in sea directions:
      3. Navy fighter aircraft
      4. ship air defense: SAM (Fort), Hurricane, Calm-1, Dagger, Wasp, Dagger
      and only then:
      5. interceptors MIG-31
      6. SAM S-300 PMU-1, SAM S-400, ZRPK Shell
      1. 0
        23 October 2017 14: 10
        As far as I remember, air defense is only in the south, the Volga region are motorized rifles in Samara and the airborne forces in Ulyanovsk, they have zonal air defense, but is there a strategic cover for this complex with 400 or c300? I mean the situation when several axes broke through the Caucasus and flies along the Volga between the hills, then there is nothing to cover the campaign. Since aviation is only in Saratov, these are helicopter pilots and strategists, and then only MiG-31 in Perm ... and this is for the whole huge Urals and Volga ...
    3. +2
      23 October 2017 12: 26
      It is impossible to defend oneself completely against axes from amers with their thousands and only one destroyer carries a hundred.

      And when the same destroyer shoots back, the axes will not fly in a heap, but each will choose its own route and disperse.

      The only thing that can help is a counterattack in advance on the suspicious movements of their equipment.

      But as we remember from the beginning of the Second World War, Stalin did not do this and Putin I think will not do either ...
      1. +2
        23 October 2017 12: 43
        Quote: Krabik
        It is impossible to defend oneself completely against axes from amers with their thousands and only one destroyer carries a hundred.

        Yes, there are more than 100 launchers, but there are no separate launchers for anti-aircraft or anti-ship missiles, so one destroyer will not launch 100 strike missiles. Enough already to suffer this complex is not our full frigates 22350 can also carry ~ 100 missiles of different classes in specialized launchers. And on a modernized Orlan, the total number of missiles can reach up to 300.
        Quote: Krabik
        the axes will not fly in heaps, but each one will choose his own route and disperse.

        And they flew into Shairat in two heaps. How so?
        Quote: Krabik
        But as we remember from the beginning of the Second World War, Stalin did not do this and Putin I think will not do either ...

        Well, yes, where is Stalin or Putin up to you, because only the operational situation is clear to you)))
        1. 0
          23 October 2017 13: 11
          You do not mind the annoying fact that the 22350 frigates are not in service with the Navy ?!

          Or do you not care at all about such an insignificant nuance?

          Or the fact that the frigate and the destroyer are slightly different ships according to their capabilities?

          But nothing that at Burke launchers can be loaded with different missiles, and our non-existent frigate has specialized cells and shock missiles with a maximum of only 16 pieces ?!

          And of course, it doesn’t bother you that the states in the ranks of the Berks have 64 pieces apart from another armada.

          To roughly imagine the state of our air defense, imagine that 100 healthy men with chains and armatures attacked you in a park while jogging, and you only have a pepper spray behind your belt%)
          1. +1
            23 October 2017 14: 44
            You do not mind the annoying fact that the 22350 frigates are not in service with the Navy ?!

            But the trial operation of the 2's TFR of the 22350 project in the Russian Navy, is that what?
            "night at the museum"
            ships are operated by the fleet. and point.
            1. +1
              23 October 2017 15: 04
              Well, the United States in this case is using Zumvolt and laser guns from Star Wars%)

              We will have pi-piu from us in the laser, and we piu-piu from a frigate without missiles and other weapons.
              We will throw sausage in them%)

              Well, how can dogs not bite ...
          2. 0
            23 October 2017 22: 40
            Quote: Krabik
            Imagine that 100 healthy men with chains and fittings attacked you in a park while jogging, and you only have a pepper spray behind your belt

            You have behind you a satchel with explosives, from the explosion of which both the men and the park and the adjacent buildings will blow to the core of Matryona fellow
          3. +1
            24 October 2017 10: 30
            Quote: Krabik
            You do not mind the annoying fact that the 22350 frigates are not in service with the Navy ?!

            Quote: Krabik
            and our non-existing frigate

            By the end of the year will be. Tell us, why are you running into amers and broadcasting about a non-existent frigate?

            Quote: Krabik
            he has a maximum of only 16 pieces ?!

            Is this not enough for a frigate ?! You’ll probably tell us now that Americans are much MUCH better, right?
            Quote: Krabik
            Or the fact that the frigate and the destroyer are slightly different ships according to their capabilities?

            Quote: Krabik
            the states in the ranks of the berks have 64 pieces, not counting another armada.

            Russia has neither ambitions nor an opportunity to own the oceans, so there is no need to compete with the United States at sea. I pointed out that you are "exaggerating" ..
            Quote: Krabik
            only one destroyer carries a hundred.

            .
            Quote: Krabik
            To roughly imagine the state of our air defense, imagine that 100 healthy men with chains and armatures attacked you in a park while jogging, and you only have a pepper spray behind your belt%)

            Hmm .. tell this nonsense to the air defense officers.
            1. 0
              24 October 2017 10: 55
              You try to read the comments of my opponents and notice that they often compare prototypes in single copies that didn’t even arrive in the aircraft with those already delivered to the conveyor in the US Armed Forces.

              In our case, a couple of frigates that are being tested are compared with destroyers in a quantity of 64 pieces. Well, it's somehow ridiculous%)

              Or for example, compare the T-50 plane with the F-35.
              Here's how to compare weapons that exist with those that don't exist and beat yourself in a vest, that we’ll tear amers like a hot-water bottle ?!

              And as for the air defense officers, they have already shown themselves in Syria by observing how even the comments are redundant in the urine of the ally.

              Why am I harnessing for amers ?!
              I like to swim against the current%)

              PS
              Here's an interesting video where Musk shows how they print parts for rockets from titanium and a little bit about Merlin’s engines.
              This is to understand the abyss between our production and production in the USA:
              1. 0
                24 October 2017 11: 55
                Quote: Krabik
                what is the abyss between our production and production in the USA:

                What would you understand something about the GREAT Mask))
                https://pikabu.ru/story/kak_ustroen_akkumulyator_
                yelektromobilya_tesla_model_s_4220360
                Do not be offended, but it seems you are far from both air defense, the Navy, and production ..
                Quote: Krabik
                which is with that which does not exist

                Do not you think that the adverb "does not exist" is not appropriate?
                Quote: Krabik
                And about air defense officers, they have already shown themselves in Syria

                Rather, the REB officers showed that the air defenders did not fire at the tomahawks and this is a political decision
                http://www.interfax.ru/world/557830

                Quote: Krabik
                to beat ourselves in a vest that we will tear amers, as an ace a hot-water bottle ?!

                Your opponents do not say this, you are raising a panic here ..
                Quote: Krabik
                To roughly imagine the state of our air defense, imagine that 100 healthy men with chains and armatures attacked you in a park while jogging, and you only have a pepper spray behind your belt%)


                1. 0
                  24 October 2017 12: 19
                  Musk speaks and does.

                  Battery try to do better for your factory producing their cars;)

                  Then you will also become great, like Ford or Musk or Korolev.


                  If you substitute the word in the troops, then "does not exist" is quite appropriate.
                  1. 0
                    24 October 2017 12: 27
                    Quote: Krabik
                    If you substitute the word in the troops, then "does not exist" is quite appropriate.

                    Do not take it for a gramophage, but then it was necessary to write "still not put into service", you would understand. Between this and simply "does not exist" an abyss of differences.
                    Quote: Krabik
                    Battery try to do better

                    Don't you think that such a device of batteries is especially comical against the background of the news that the great Musk built the world's largest factory for the production of batteries and claims about super technologies.
                    In this case, surpass - Stalin or Putin, then we'll talk, as an industrialist with the Secretary General / President))
                    1. 0
                      24 October 2017 12: 31
                      That is, I’m talking to a Ford-level industrialist now and in order to continue communication I need to reach Stalin’s level ?!

                      You are even more arrogant than I shake my hand ...
                      1. 0
                        24 October 2017 12: 35
                        Quote: Krabik
                        That is, I’m talking to a Ford-level industrialist now and in order to continue communication I need to reach Stalin’s level ?!

                        I kind of transparently hint that since I need to become a Ford in order to express my own opinion, then you need to become a figure of no less importance than Stalin or Putin, taking into account your previous statement:
                        Quote: Krabik
                        The only thing that can help is a counterattack in advance on suspicious movements. theirs techniques.
                        But as we remember from the beginning of the Second World War, Stalin did not do this and Putin I think will not do either ...

                        By the way, not theirs, but theirs, General Sec.
                    2. 0
                      24 October 2017 12: 56
                      You tried to pin me up with Mask and batteries, but this year I studied this issue when I needed to make my own assembly of batteries for a screwdriver.

                      And I will tell you that laptops also use 18650 batteries.

                      They are standard and distributed. The Philips company established their release and they have good quality.

                      If you think that something is wrong there, can you tell me what's wrong and how to do it ?!

                      Purely, as an engineer to engineer%)
                      1. 0
                        24 October 2017 12: 59
                        Quote: Krabik
                        Purely, as an engineer to engineer%)

                        I'm not an engineer, and you're kind of a programmer, no? I believe that the batteries should be their own utilitarian design at least to justify the loud statements of the Mask, the high demands of the automotive industry and the hopes of its fans. For comparing HandMade and products of mega corporation 5+
  7. +2
    23 October 2017 12: 19
    I don’t understand one thing, why do modern complexes deliver in a towed version? It seems that the S-300 self-propelled chassis was a step forward in terms of mobility in comparison with the towed option.
    1. 0
      23 October 2017 14: 12
      Self-propelled is army defense, the remaining non-self-propelled cover strategic areas ...
      1. 0
        23 October 2017 15: 53
        Army air defense just do it on a tracked track. Objective air defense in Soviet times was also on self-propelled wheeled units, only the very first S-300 models were towed.

        Is it really so quarreled with Grigorovich that they sacrificed the mobility of air defense?
  8. +1
    23 October 2017 13: 25
    I love such articles. Made and reported. I do not like empty promises.
  9. +1
    23 October 2017 18: 57
    But tell the old man: are C-400 launchers for the C-2500 generally provided? Well, the type of "Antei-XNUMX"? Who is in the know? thanks in advance. hi
  10. 0
    23 October 2017 20: 39
    Quote: VohaAhov
    One S-400 division is sold abroad at a price of $ 500 million. So count how the investments paid off. S-400 purchases China, India, Vietnam. Egypt, Turkey and Saudi Arabia are gathering.

    A division is a combat set, but without a rear it is not a part. It’s like a company without foreman, sergeants and capters — it's just that people with pieces of iron in the parade drive through, not serve for a year. The regiment must have and develop its younger cadres and its rear, otherwise there will be no service, no working equipment.