Military Review

Arsenal Su-35 replenished with missiles X-35

80
The new high-precision cruise missile X-35U will allow Su-35 fighters to destroy almost the entire spectrum of targets, ranging from ships and ending with fortifications and enemy armored vehicles, according to News.


Arsenal Su-35 replenished with missiles X-35


After testing, the rocket officially became part of the Su-35 armament.

The Kh-35U was created by the Tactical Missile Armament Corporation (KTRV). This is the first fully unified rocket, the use of which is possible both from surface and submarine ships, coastal missile systems, and aviation carriers, ”the article says.

According to the newspaper, the X-35U rocket has a mass of 550 kg, of which 145 kg is in the warhead. Flight speed - 300 m / s, range of application - 260 km. “At present, several series of surface ships of the class rocket boat / corvette, Su-35, Su-24, MiG-30K / KUBR, Su-29С, T-35 and anti-submarine Tu-50, as well as helicopters have become the carriers of the X-142U. Ka-27, Ka-28 and Ka-52K. The rocket is used as part of the Bal coastal missile system, ”the publication said.

The creation of unified types of weapons allows you to optimize costs by making one rocket for different types of carriers. The missile is already being used on deck fighters MiG-29K / KUBR, attack helicopters Ka-52. At the beginning of this year, it was tested as part of the onboard armament of a promising 5 fighter of the Su-57 generation,
said the chief designer of the missile complex Nikolai Vasiliev.

Professor of the Academy of Military Sciences Vadim Kozyulin:

With the advent of a unified cruise missile Su-35С in the armament, it will be able to hit practically the whole range of targets with equal efficiency, ranging from ships and ending with enemy fortifications and armored vehicles. The main advantage of the X-35U missile in a passive homing head. Unlike conventional active, it does not scan the space, but catches the radiation of the attacked object. This allows the rocket, without revealing itself, to bypass the air defense system and accurately hit a given target.
Photos used:
http://www.vitalykuzmin.net
80 comments
Ad

Our projects are looking for authors in the news and analytical departments. Requirements for applicants: literacy, responsibility, efficiency, inexhaustible creative energy, experience in copywriting or journalism, the ability to quickly analyze text and check facts, write concisely and interestingly on political and economic topics. The work is paid. Contact: [email protected]

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. NEXUS
    NEXUS 23 October 2017 09: 38 New
    +8
    According to the newspaper, the Kh-35U missile has a mass of 550 kg, of which 145 kg falls on the warhead. Flight speed - 300 m / s, range of use - 260 km

    A good rocket, only a range of 260 km against the ships is not enough ... you need a range at which the aircraft will not enter the air defense of the ships.
    1. novel66
      novel66 23 October 2017 09: 42 New
      +6
      Yes, and the warhead is too small, for a ship it would be more
      1. Burbon
        Burbon 23 October 2017 09: 54 New
        +8
        Quote: novel xnumx
        Yes, and the warhead is too small, for a ship it would be more

        it’s strange that you didn’t write about it before .... the coastal ball complexes are armed with this missile, and some of the corvettes are the same .... before they shouted cheers - now it’s not enough negative
        1. novel66
          novel66 23 October 2017 10: 18 New
          +8
          I did not scream cheers - I just did not know request but for a serious ship - indeed not enough, maybe a dog can survive!
          1. Zhenya
            Zhenya 23 October 2017 18: 54 New
            0
            The X-35 missile is designed to destroy ships with a displacement of up to 5000 tons and it will cope with this task perfectly, and against serious ships there are serious Bastion complexes with the Yakhont missile, after which no dog can be saved
          2. asr55
            asr55 1 November 2019 11: 28 New
            0
            You as a pharmacist from the "elusive" about "not enough." Each ship has its own purpose and, accordingly, armament. Or do you think that if you didn’t like it, then immediately put the yars on the corvette !? On YouTube there is a video of the launch of x-35u missiles on a decommissioned destroyer. I advise you to see a good example of one hit x-35.
        2. alexmach
          alexmach 23 October 2017 10: 27 New
          +2
          Normally, a small rocket is also needed for small purposes, it is a pity that there are none on ships with UKKS.
      2. hrych
        hrych 23 October 2017 10: 04 New
        +5
        A ship, a ship of discord and a Su-35 are not a giant, although Onyx-Bramos is already an aircraft and can do it, but a trifle must also be felled wassat And do not forget that the enemy’s air defense range is in direct line of sight, and drying can sneak up over the horizon, and in this sense, this range allows you not to enter the enemy’s air defense zone. Well, you can slap a couple into the side and in the aggregate already 300 kg of explosives laughing
        1. novel66
          novel66 23 October 2017 10: 22 New
          12
          somehow it seems to me that two to fifty are worse than three hundred at once. tested on experience drinks
          1. NIKNN
            NIKNN 23 October 2017 11: 02 New
            11
            Quote: novel xnumx
            somehow it seems to me that two to fifty are worse than three hundred at once. tested on experience

            On Monday in the morning and 2x150 is not worse than 300 ... drinks
            1. novel66
              novel66 23 October 2017 12: 14 New
              11
              yes, the question is, of course, situational, requires further experiments drinks
              1. NIKNN
                NIKNN 23 October 2017 12: 15 New
                +3
                Quote: novel xnumx
                yes, the question is, of course, situational, requires further experiments drinks

                The main thing is not to overdo the charge ... smile drinks
                1. novel66
                  novel66 23 October 2017 12: 45 New
                  +5
                  yeah, rip fuck, sweep ...
                  1. NIKNN
                    NIKNN 23 October 2017 12: 46 New
                    +1
                    Quote: novel xnumx
                    yeah, rip fuck, sweep ...

                    smile
                  2. Svarog51
                    Svarog51 23 October 2017 12: 55 New
                    +8
                    yeah, rip fuck, sweep ...

                    "Everything needs skill, training, training ..." laughing drinks
          2. hrych
            hrych 23 October 2017 11: 06 New
            +4
            Three hundredths are much nicer and custom again ... drinks
            1. Svarog51
              Svarog51 23 October 2017 12: 12 New
              13
              My wife will allow me, each one hundred
              A total of three hundred grams is something
              But when "on the eyebrows" I come home
              I have a scandal with every wife.
              A verse that was not included in the song of the movie "Prisoner of the Caucasus", but was shown in one of the "Blue Lights". good
              Will it fit for a toast? drinks
              1. novel66
                novel66 23 October 2017 12: 47 New
                +4
                and then! Hello hi , and also very good - 100 is not enough, 200 is a lot, how much is needed? - two each 150 (again this figure)
                1. Svarog51
                  Svarog51 23 October 2017 12: 53 New
                  +9
                  Hi hi Remember the priest from the "Queen of the gas station": - Two hundred in one dish! I’m not used to half measures! good drinks
                  1. novel66
                    novel66 23 October 2017 12: 55 New
                    +3
                    and this is a joke: "Father deacon, why should you pour vodka or wine?" - "..and beer !!"
                    1. Svarog51
                      Svarog51 23 October 2017 13: 04 New
                      +8
                      "Oh, they will catch the person of my spiritual rank!"
                      1. novel66
                        novel66 23 October 2017 13: 09 New
                        +4
                        birds, repent of your sins in public !!
                    2. Svarog51
                      Svarog51 23 October 2017 13: 14 New
                      +8
                      We went to the landing, otherwise they would drag some sort of air defense system and bring down both of them. drinks
          3. Dead duck
            Dead duck 23 October 2017 12: 31 New
            +7
            Quote: novel xnumx
            somehow it seems to me that two to fifty are worse than three hundred at once. tested on experience

            "We don’t need 900, two on 200 and 500!" laughing drinks
        2. Captain Pushkin
          Captain Pushkin 24 October 2017 16: 38 New
          0
          Quote: hrych
          Well, you can slap a couple into the board and, together, already 300 kg of laughing explosives

          145 kg - warhead mass, and the explosives in it by a force of 50 kg.
          But this is not a gift to the frigate destroyer. If it stays afloat and on the go, it will have to rake in for repairs.
      3. hrych
        hrych 23 October 2017 10: 19 New
        +2
        I also have the seditious idea of ​​a tactical nuclear charge spinning, so that the aircraft carrier, and the connection, if desired, our engineers will probably cope wassat
        1. novel66
          novel66 23 October 2017 12: 15 New
          +5
          Well, Chegozh no, if in a howitzer shell stuffed
        2. mat-vey
          mat-vey 23 October 2017 12: 31 New
          0
          Quote: hrych
          our engineers can handle it

          And they still remained, these engineers?
          1. volodimer
            volodimer 23 October 2017 17: 18 New
            0
            Remained!!!!! After communicating with them ... in the morning .. I want something: drinks
            Quote: NIKNN
            Quote: novel xnumx
            somehow it seems to me that two to fifty are worse than three hundred at once. tested on experience

            On Monday in the morning and 2x150 is not worse than 300 ... drinks
            1. mat-vey
              mat-vey 23 October 2017 17: 26 New
              +1
              Well, these two or two and before that all nuclear fuel was distilled for alcohol, and how did they retire ...
              1. novel66
                novel66 23 October 2017 18: 27 New
                +3
                we, in aviation, did not need such complex actions
                if you want - do not deny yourself, my friend! drinks
                1. mat-vey
                  mat-vey 23 October 2017 18: 34 New
                  +1
                  Well, then in aviation ... but what about poor physical engineers? True, they say there were some reactors with alcohol, but not everyone was lucky ....
        3. Captain Pushkin
          Captain Pushkin 24 October 2017 16: 40 New
          +1
          Quote: hrych

          2
          grunt Yesterday, 10:19 ↑
          I also have the seditious idea of ​​a tactical nuclear charge spinning, so that the aircraft carrier, and the connection, if desired, our engineers will probably cope

          Forty-fifty years ago, the Americans had a tactical nuclear charge in the caliber of 120mm for recoilless guns.
    2. Andrei from Chelyabinsk
      Andrei from Chelyabinsk 23 October 2017 09: 53 New
      +8
      Normal range, this missile against medium-sized ships, corvette or boat, well, a frigate maximum. In principle, for the BF and the Black Sea Fleet it’s the most, there the aircraft carriers do not expect
      1. NEXUS
        NEXUS 23 October 2017 09: 56 New
        +5
        Quote: Andrey from Chelyabinsk
        Normal range, this missile against medium-sized ships, corvette or boat, well, a frigate maximum

        And the frigates have a kapets, what a small air defense range ... much less than 260 km.
        1. Andrei from Chelyabinsk
          Andrei from Chelyabinsk 23 October 2017 10: 02 New
          +2
          Sorry, I did not understand. Do you offer a frigate to shoot at 260 km? How do you understand the air defense range?
          1. NEXUS
            NEXUS 23 October 2017 10: 04 New
            +4
            Quote: Andrey from Chelyabinsk
            Sorry, I did not understand. Do you offer a frigate to shoot at 260 km? How do you understand the air defense range?

            First, answer me a question: Do NATO frigates go as part of an attack group or alone? And then we'll talk about air defense.
            1. Andrei from Chelyabinsk
              Andrei from Chelyabinsk 23 October 2017 12: 02 New
              +1
              I do not think that they go as part of shock groups. Who should beat the German frigates in the Baltic or the Turkish at the World Cup? Rather, they fulfill their inherent tasks, such as protecting their own waters, caboters, and performing the functions of submarines. IBM is possible in principle, but why? In principle, they carry out their tasks within the radius of our and their aviators
              1. NEXUS
                NEXUS 23 October 2017 12: 05 New
                +2
                Quote: Andrey from Chelyabinsk
                Who should beat the German frigates in the Baltic or the Turkish at the World Cup?

                And where does the Baltic and the Russian Sea come from? Are NATO frigates only German and only in the waters of the Russian and Baltic seas?
                1. Andrei from Chelyabinsk
                  Andrei from Chelyabinsk 23 October 2017 13: 14 New
                  +1
                  Despite the fact that we will fight in the Baltic and at the World Cup, if something happens. If they climb into Barentsovo, then only submarines, AB will work from the coast of Norway, but on the furthest with such missiles, you can pinch the Japanese plane well until the ABs are drawn.
      2. d ^ Amir
        d ^ Amir 23 October 2017 10: 29 New
        +8
        Good day!!!!! In the conflict with the Britons, the Argentines managed to put Sheffield out of action for one of the ecosets ... yes, so they couldn’t save him ... sank ... and there the mass of the warhead was 165 kg., Of which explosives of only 50 kg ..... so a very, very comparable weapon ...
    3. Lord of the Sith
      Lord of the Sith 23 October 2017 09: 58 New
      +2
      Is there really a NATO air defense range of 260 km?
      1. NEXUS
        NEXUS 23 October 2017 10: 00 New
        +4
        Quote: Lord of the Sith
        Is there really a NATO air defense range of 260 km?

        Do you think that NATO frigates walk the seas in splendid isolation?
        1. Lord of the Sith
          Lord of the Sith 23 October 2017 10: 11 New
          11
          They go both in the warrant and in solitude. An example of two damaged frigates that collided with dry cargo ships was walking alone.

          But I asked without any subtexts about air defense, and not about fighter aircraft from an aircraft carrier.
          1. NEXUS
            NEXUS 23 October 2017 10: 12 New
            +3
            Quote: Lord of the Sith
            They go both in the warrant and in solitude.

            During the fighting, just, excuse me, the captain who is ill with a head will go on a frigate alone at sea. And with regards to the order ... what is the air defense radius of the order?
            1. Lord of the Sith
              Lord of the Sith 23 October 2017 10: 21 New
              +7
              There are several radii, since there are different weapons, for example volcanoes and air defense missiles of various ranges, ending with fighter aircraft.
              But I asked you if the air defense of frigates is fired at 260 km. If I knew, why would I ask? And you began to answer a question with a question.
              1. NEXUS
                NEXUS 23 October 2017 10: 24 New
                +3
                Quote: Lord of the Sith
                But I asked you if the air defense of frigates is fired at 260 km.

                I gently pointed out to you that the warrant contains air defense of a group, which includes air defense of frigates too ... and so the radius of an air defense order is much larger than the radius of one frigate. Therefore, I wrote that the X-35 range is not sufficient, as our planes will have to enter the air defense zone of the ORDER.
                1. Lord of the Sith
                  Lord of the Sith 23 October 2017 10: 29 New
                  +4
                  So we returned to the first question, what air defense warrants?
                2. Alexey RA
                  Alexey RA 23 October 2017 11: 19 New
                  +3
                  Quote: NEXUS
                  I gently pointed out to you that the warrant contains air defense of a group, which includes air defense of frigates too ... and so the radius of an air defense order is much larger than the radius of one frigate.

                  The radius of the air defense group in the absence of AB is limited to the radio horizon. Actually, this is precisely why our Navy so wanted to get an AB: for even targets “Fort” could fire no further than 30-35 km on targets going to the MV and PMV.
                  In addition, as the experience of the Falklands shows, in the absence of AWACS aircraft, the strike force can distinguish from its composition radar patrols of 1-2 ships that are deployed in the most dangerous directions (and operating outside the "umbrella" of the air defense group). So even in an attack group there can be single targets.
                3. Setrac
                  Setrac 23 October 2017 22: 50 New
                  +1
                  Quote: NEXUS
                  Therefore, I wrote that the X-35 range is not sufficient, as our planes will have to enter the air defense zone of the ORDER.

                  Against the ORDER, Russia has “onyxes” and “calibers” - which are the main caliber of our fleet, and the X-35 is definitely the second caliber (sorry for taftology) of our armed forces. Well, do not shoot onyxes at each trough!
              2. Captain Pushkin
                Captain Pushkin 24 October 2017 16: 52 New
                0
                On American cruisers and destroyers, the RIM-156A SM-2ER Block IV missiles have a long-range 370 km engagement line.
                On frigates, everything is much more modest than 260 km.
            2. mac789
              mac789 23 October 2017 10: 50 New
              +2
              That's just during the fighting, and frigates will hang around alone, and even aircraft carriers. So to speak in case of operational necessity and in accordance with the available capabilities. Remember at least the 41st year and our TB - 3 on the attack and without fighter cover.
              1. Nasrat
                Nasrat 23 October 2017 10: 59 New
                +2
                Another question is - who will send the lone SU-35 against the AUG ??? wassat What nonsense guys?
            3. Svarog51
              Svarog51 23 October 2017 12: 28 New
              +7
              During the fighting, only, I'm sorry, the captain who is sick with a head will go on a frigate alone at sea

              Andrey, my respect hi And for some reason I remembered Indianapolis, though they drowned it with torpedoes, but the essence of the matter does not change. Another "Single swimming", where ours fought back, with all regular weapons. In war, anything can happen.
        2. Dorren
          Dorren 23 October 2017 10: 13 New
          +5
          Do you think that the Su-35 will fly to attack the NATO frigates in splendid isolation?

          In addition, we are talking about UNIFICATIONS - that is, it can be used AND ALSO - depending on the tasks, which is certainly good.
          1. NEXUS
            NEXUS 23 October 2017 10: 14 New
            +3
            Quote: Dorren
            Do you think that the Su-35 will fly to attack the NATO frigates in splendid isolation?

            Do you think that the warrant has one rocket for the whole group?
            1. Muvka
              Muvka 23 October 2017 10: 16 New
              +2
              And I believe that the Su-35 has electronic warfare.
              1. NEXUS
                NEXUS 23 October 2017 10: 17 New
                +3
                Quote: Muvka
                And I believe that the Su-35 has electronic warfare.

                Which are not a panacea and one hundred percent protection.
                1. alexmach
                  alexmach 23 October 2017 10: 30 New
                  +2
                  To attack an order, you still need 1. mass 2. rockets more serious.
              2. arkadiyssk
                arkadiyssk 23 October 2017 21: 35 New
                0
                So the destroyer frigates have electronic warfare. What can this rocket with its passive head do against Nulka or similar systems? Somehow the author of the article bypasses this unpleasant question.
            2. Dorren
              Dorren 23 October 2017 10: 24 New
              +7
              Do you think that the command will attack a serious group of NATO ships only the Su-35 and only, say, a link or two? Analyze and allocate the appropriate forces and means.

              In principle, there’s nothing to argue about here - it’s just strange that you got caught in these 260 km. For me, the news is still good for the reasons mentioned above.
    4. Berkut24
      Berkut24 23 October 2017 10: 41 New
      +3
      A good rocket, only a range of 260 km against the ships is not enough ... you need a range at which the aircraft will not enter the air defense of the ships.

      Only SM-2 Block IV and SM-3 can shoot down an aircraft at such a range, but only large ships with powerful radar are armed with it. In addition, a range of 260 km for the Kh-35U is most likely indicated for use as part of the Ball, where a lot of energy is spent on ground launch. It is possible that with an air launch, the range will be noticeably greater.
    5. Savignon
      Savignon 23 October 2017 19: 01 New
      0
      Heh, that’s how they took us and immediately told us everything about the new missile, so that the CIA would react to the new Russian weapons as quickly as possible. This is all “according to the newspaper,” but no one will give real data laughing
  2. Doliva63
    Doliva63 23 October 2017 09: 43 New
    +8
    "Unlike ordinary active ones, it does not scan the space, but catches the radiation of the attacked object."
    And the attacked object, as I understand it, will radiate with fright? belay
    1. Muvka
      Muvka 23 October 2017 09: 47 New
      +2
      Well, ships are constantly scanning. They have a lot of radars.
    2. Andrei from Chelyabinsk
      Andrei from Chelyabinsk 23 October 2017 09: 51 New
      +5
      Yes, this is nonsense, the x-35u has an active-passive GOS. That is, she searches for herself, and if something comes up from the radiation
  3. Romario_Argo
    Romario_Argo 23 October 2017 09: 50 New
    +4
    interesting, but what should be the speed of the carrier i.e. Su-35at startup RCC X-35U
    the rocket is subsonic, there must be some sort of accelerator
    accordingly, the range will no longer be 260 km.
    besides, it also matters dump height
    example: if the altitude is 10 km and there is an accelerator, and the speed of the Su-35 2100 km / h (to quickly leave the air defense zone), then we can talk about the RCC range from 350 km to 500 km.
    1. Mimoprohodil
      Mimoprohodil 23 October 2017 10: 17 New
      +1
      Start-up conditions:
      - from an airplane: altitude ranges, km / speeds (M) - 0,2 - 10 / 0,35 - 0,9
      Subsonic carrier speed should be
      Quote: Romario_Argo
      then we can talk about a range of 350 km to 500 km.
      Then western similar missiles would have the same range
  4. Alexey-74
    Alexey-74 23 October 2017 10: 01 New
    +1
    It’s great, given the maneuverability of the SU-35 and its own speed, the ability to instantly leave the enemy’s air defense zone, such a rocket will accurately open any object like a scalpel !!!
  5. tlauicol
    tlauicol 23 October 2017 10: 06 New
    +1
    the most interesting thing is that the Supreme, showing the newest corvette a month ago, was reported about 130 km in range. What's on the Pacific Fleet, what on the BF
    1. tlauicol
      tlauicol 23 October 2017 11: 32 New
      +1
      Putin on the Perfect finds out about the RCC range, the age of the ship and sees a drawn hearth (i.e. the Package)
    2. novel66
      novel66 23 October 2017 15: 14 New
      +3
      260 - this is if with a return
  6. _Jack_
    _Jack_ 23 October 2017 10: 23 New
    0
    The main advantage of the Kh-35U missile in the passive homing head.

    The X-35 had an active seeker ARGS-35. Who knows what the GOS is here?
  7. voyaka uh
    voyaka uh 23 October 2017 10: 25 New
    +2
    The missile is quite reasonable in terms of warhead and radius of action.
    To destroy important objects without exposing the aircraft to danger.
    1. novel66
      novel66 23 October 2017 15: 17 New
      +3
      yeah, touched the "opportunity to work on armored vehicles", such a shit and a tank, 150 kg!
  8. Old military officer
    Old military officer 23 October 2017 11: 23 New
    +1
    Nice car! A ball, organized with its help, is real fun for understanding people, especially those who asked for this ball. At least, as I understand it.
  9. askort154
    askort154 23 October 2017 11: 38 New
    +2
    "..... The missile is already used on carrier-based fighters ..."

    This news caresses the ear! And then we have already been accustomed to future times. Type - "soon", "by the end of the year", "by 2020" , "allocated money for the project", etc.
  10. Alexander Abdrakhmanov
    Alexander Abdrakhmanov 23 October 2017 13: 38 New
    0
    Who said that this rocket flies up to 260 km. For our foreign media, they wrote that “The caliber flies up to 350 km, and they flew around Syria several times further, and NATO took their heads. Now they are launching and forgetting to make rockets so as not to enter the enemy’s zone. Who wakes up to write accurate characteristics for these missiles. They were and will remain secrets, only the military who control these weapons know about it. The enemy will know when the object wakes up, and then if Russia writes about it. And they will show on video.
    1. Andrei from Chelyabinsk
      Andrei from Chelyabinsk 23 October 2017 18: 22 New
      +1
      Quote: Alexander Abdrakhmanov
      We wrote for foreign media that "The caliber flies up to 350 km, and they flew around Syria several times further

      Listen, well, you can’t. Are you too lazy to spend two seconds on Google? About 350 (more precisely - 375 km) they spoke only about the anti-ship Caliber, and about the Caliber for hitting ground targets, they initially gave a range of 2500 km
    2. Alexey RA
      Alexey RA 23 October 2017 19: 27 New
      0
      Quote: Alexander Abdrakhmanov
      We wrote for foreign media that “The caliber flies up to 350 km, and they flew around Syria several times further, and all of NATO took over.

      C'mon - the real range of cruise and anti-ship missiles of the Caliber system was explicitly said twice in 2012, when the Caspian Flotilla received the first naval surface calibrator Dagestan in the entire Navy (pr. 11661K).
      I will say that the best ship is not in quotation marks, but in the fact that it is the first submarine in history to be armed with the latest Caliber missile system. Which is not on one Navy missile ship. In principle, not one surface ship now has such a long-range firing as our ship. He shoots more than two thousand kilometers on a coastal target. And 350 kilometers by sea.

      © from a speech by the Commander of the Caspian Flotilla S. Alekminsky in the program "Military Council"
      The ship is not bad, with a modern filling. This is currently the most powerful ship in the arsenal of the Russian fleet. It has a missile system, the firing range of which on surface targets is 375 km, and on a coastal target - up to 2 km. There are no more such complexes with powerful missile weapons in Russia, only in submarines.

      © from an interview with the commander of the Caspian flotilla S. Alekminsky

      PS about the "submarine ship" commander clearly made a reservation. smile