Military Review

Seoul may delay the decommissioning of the Russian T-80U

109
Seoul may review plans to decommission Russian tanks T-80U, despite problems with their compatibility with other equipment in the South Korean arsenal, reports RIA News Post South Korean parliamentarian Lee Jong Hol.


Seoul may delay the decommissioning of the Russian T-80U


T-80U tanks and BMP-3 armored vehicles were delivered to the Republic of Korea in 1995 and 2002 in payment of the USSR government debt. Previously it was assumed that the South Korean army would gradually abandon the use of this technology in the period from 2018 to 2022 year.

However, the implementation of this plan may be postponed indefinitely due to the lack of an alternative to date.

The fact that the T-80U tanks or the BMP-3 armored vehicles confirmed their outstanding abilities in battle is a fact; but if we take into account the difficulties arising from the use due to the lack of spare parts, it is necessary to urgently prepare a plan that will determine whether the purchase of spare parts for military complexes is necessary on the terms of a military agreement with Russia or the position on the prompt replacement of weapons should be supported,
said Lee Jong Gol.

In addition to problems with the compatibility of Russian cars with other equipment, which is in service, Lee Jong-Gol noted the difficulties in repairing T-80U by Korean specialists and the lack of components for replacement in case of malfunctions. In addition, he said, “the stock of shells for the T-80U may not be sufficient in the event of an emergency.”

Earlier it was reported that at the beginning of 2017, in the South Korean army there were about 35-t tanks T-80U and about 70-ti BMP-3.
Photos used:
reddit.com
109 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Pirogov
    Pirogov 22 October 2017 16: 33 New
    13
    The South Koreans stirred, apparently comrade Eun is respected.
    1. pjastolov
      pjastolov 22 October 2017 16: 36 New
      15
      Quote: Pirogov
      The South Koreans stirred, apparently comrade Eun is respected.

      and if respected, then they are afraid laughing
      1. NIKNN
        NIKNN 22 October 2017 16: 49 New
        13
        Quote: pjastolov
        and if respected, then they are afraid

        No, it’s just that their “black panther” has slowed down ..., BMP-3 They will change when the states replace Bradley with weapons ....
        So I think ... hi
        1. pjastolov
          pjastolov 22 October 2017 16: 51 New
          +7
          Quote: NIKNN
          So I think ...

          well, wait and see when they brake lol
          1. NIKNN
            NIKNN 22 October 2017 16: 57 New
            +2
            Quote: pjastolov
            well, wait and see when they brake

            Like at least a year, and there ... request And to replace the ravings, so generally until 2030 ...
            1. pjastolov
              pjastolov 22 October 2017 17: 21 New
              +7
              Quote: NIKNN
              And to replace the ravings, so generally until 2030 ...

              so the time for disinhibition is a kilometer, then you can catch it and brake again laughing
              1. NIKNN
                NIKNN 22 October 2017 17: 27 New
                +2
                Quote: pjastolov
                so the time for disinhibition is a kilometer, then you can catch it and brake again

                smile
                1. Graz
                  Graz 23 October 2017 05: 46 New
                  +1
                  South Korea has had its own BMP for a long time, it was developed by the k-21, but apparently it went out like a black panther, they got some kind of serious cant in the construction of the suspension hydraulics got out after several years of operation, somewhere I read about it and it seems like these tanks are easier let in metal than redo
                  1. NIKNN
                    NIKNN 23 October 2017 10: 44 New
                    +1
                    Quote: Graz
                    a serious jamb in the construction of the suspension hydraulics got out after several years of operation,

                    Almost one to one and in the panther the same crap ...
        2. alexmach
          alexmach 22 October 2017 17: 21 New
          0
          What does it mean slowed down? it seems to have been adopted for a long time already. Unless they can’t buy them in sufficient quantities, it was like the most expensive in the world.
          1. Alex777
            Alex777 22 October 2017 18: 19 New
            +2
            So on the first batch there were German transmissions, and on the second it was supposed to be Korean, but it failed. Refining ...
            In general, 35 tanks are a strange topic for discussion. hi
            1. Kent0001
              Kent0001 22 October 2017 19: 08 New
              +1
              For South Korea, this is quite a significant amount.
              1. alexmach
                alexmach 22 October 2017 19: 42 New
                +3
                Yes, how to say. I've climbed K1 tanks on Wikipedia, they have one and a half thousand, K1m - four hundred.
            2. 113262a
              113262a 23 October 2017 01: 27 New
              0
              A full-fledged battalion and a motorized rifle battalion of a tank regiment (its tank part) They promised to redeem!
          2. NIKNN
            NIKNN 22 October 2017 20: 47 New
            +2
            Quote: alexmach
            What does it mean slowed down? it seems to have been adopted for a long time already. Unless they can’t buy them in sufficient quantities, it was like the most expensive in the world.

            They accepted, but, something with the running ..., the release was suspended ... Recently, somewhere it was ...
        3. IL-18
          IL-18 22 October 2017 20: 11 New
          +2
          I remember when a news appeared on the site about the possibility of redeeming these tanks, they immediately, who is to the North, who has already deployed a battalion somewhere ... But they lack shells and spare parts due to the alleged resale of the RF back. Now, perhaps something will be paid to Rosoboronexport. Such is their neighbor.
          Maybe they wave the T-90? In my opinion, it's time to offer.
      2. The_lancet
        The_lancet 22 October 2017 16: 50 New
        +1
        Why leave them armed further? Or South. Korea produces 125 mm tank shells? Does it make sense to turn some tanks into targets for firing and testing their weapons
        1. pjastolov
          pjastolov 22 October 2017 16: 52 New
          +9
          Quote: The_Lancet
          Why leave them armed further? Or South. Korea produces 125 mm tank shells; It makes sense to turn tanks into targets for firing

          has, and with what will remain?
          1. The_lancet
            The_lancet 22 October 2017 16: 54 New
            +1
            Quote: pjastolov
            Quote: The_Lancet
            Why leave them armed further? Or South. Korea produces 125 mm tank shells; It makes sense to turn tanks into targets for firing

            has, and with what will remain?

            They will remain with the K1 and K2 tanks which began to be produced in 2013.
            Why not store Russian metal without spare parts?
            Part on landfills as targets. The rest on museums
            1. Zibelew
              Zibelew 22 October 2017 17: 18 New
              +5
              Quote: The_Lancet
              Why not store Russian metal without spare parts?
              Part on landfills as targets. The rest on museums

              Well, like Russia wanted to return the T-80.
              “The decision to return the T-80 and BMP-3 tanks was made back in 2015. An assessment of the condition of these machines has now been completed and a document with our proposal has been prepared. It was transferred to one of the working groups as part of the visit of the President of South Korea to Russia on September 3. Russia does not count on a purchase, but on a mutually beneficial barter exchange for both countries, ”a source in military-diplomatic circles told the Izvestia newspaper.
              1. pjastolov
                pjastolov 22 October 2017 17: 24 New
                +7
                or maybe let them practice shooting lol and money is looking for abrams
                1. The_lancet
                  The_lancet 22 October 2017 17: 34 New
                  +1
                  and money is looking for abrams

                  I think now there are no problems with money for defense in South Korea due to a clear crisis in relations with North Korea
                  1. pjastolov
                    pjastolov 22 October 2017 17: 36 New
                    15
                    Quote: The_Lancet
                    I think there is no money problem right now

                    money is always a problem if it's not america - which can just print it hi
                  2. Svarog51
                    Svarog51 22 October 2017 18: 05 New
                    13
                    I think there are no problems with defense money in South Korea right now.

                    I completely agree. That's just the South Koreans liked the T-80, we will supply spare parts and will continue to use it. But here politics breaks in, and adieu.
                    1. pjastolov
                      pjastolov 22 October 2017 18: 12 New
                      +5
                      hello, Sergey hi politics - she is harmful laughing
                      1. Svarog51
                        Svarog51 22 October 2017 18: 45 New
                        +8
                        Great, Volodya hi About Ivanovo, even in the USSR, legends went in terms of women. But we didn’t have “politics”, we had love. Without sex, don’t think of what. wink
                      2. pjastolov
                        pjastolov 22 October 2017 18: 50 New
                        +6
                        we had love. Without sex, don’t think of what.
                  3. abc_alex
                    abc_alex 22 October 2017 22: 16 New
                    +1
                    With money, then they may not have problems. They have problems with tanks. As I understand it, K1 has been discontinued, and there is not much Korean there. And K2 turned out to be the most expensive tank in the world at a price of over $ 9 million apiece in the domestic market. Korea cannot produce them in hundreds; the last contract involved the production of 55 cars from 2014 to 2017. At this rate of production, in the conditions of a “crisis in relations with North Korea,” one must not withdraw suitable vehicles from the army, but look for where to buy more. And certainly "to landfills as targets. The rest to museums" - this, I'm sorry, is complete idiocy. Not all gaps in defense can be plugged with decommissioned Shtatov scrap metal.
        2. Rurikovich
          Rurikovich 22 October 2017 17: 19 New
          +3
          Quote: The_Lancet
          It makes sense to turn some tanks into targets for firing and testing their weapons

          We would have driven a dozen of our Abrams and Bradley with the Strikers to us ... For firing at them and checking the quality of our weapons ... wink Weak? repeat
          Al exclusivity does not allow? wink
          1. The_lancet
            The_lancet 22 October 2017 17: 36 New
            +1
            Quote: Rurikovich
            Quote: The_Lancet
            It makes sense to turn some tanks into targets for firing and testing their weapons

            We would have driven a dozen of our Abrams and Bradley with the Strikers to us ... For firing at them and checking the quality of our weapons ... wink Weak? repeat
            Al exclusivity does not allow? wink

            And what country are you from? To "Us"?
            1. Rurikovich
              Rurikovich 22 October 2017 17: 40 New
              +5
              Quote: The_Lancet
              What country are you from?

              the USSR soldier We, the Slavs, are one country fellow Despite the borders hi
          2. svp67
            svp67 22 October 2017 18: 06 New
            +3
            Quote: Rurikovich
            Would drive with a dozen of their "Abrams"

            Now a little podshamanit and send ....
        3. Captain Pushkin
          Captain Pushkin 22 October 2017 20: 28 New
          0
          Quote: The_Lancet

          1
          The_Lancet Today, 16:50 ↑ New
          Why leave them armed further? Or South. Korea produces 125 mm tank shells? Does it make sense to turn some tanks into targets for firing and testing their weapons

          Egypt also does not produce 120mm shells for tank guns. Maybe he should use Abrams as targets? For these purposes, the Russian Federation can sell it for cheap Metisov-Kornetov and something else.
    2. RASKAT
      RASKAT 22 October 2017 16: 53 New
      +2
      Yes, there is no hope of abrams? And we can also upgrade the T-80 to them up to the modern version, let them turn hi .
      1. Mavrikiy
        Mavrikiy 22 October 2017 17: 15 New
        +1
        Quote: RASKAT
        there were about 35 T-80U tanks in the South Korean army

        there were about 35 T-80U tanks in the South Korean army
        Just a tank armada. However, they wanted to accept 100 Black Panthers.
        35 T80 = 100K2. Arithmetic ..... Of course you need to change the T80, otherwise the military-industrial complex will be bent repeat
    3. Vadim237
      Vadim237 22 October 2017 16: 59 New
      +1
      These tanks and infantry fighting vehicles will go on the assault on the 38th parallel.
      1. Grandfather
        Grandfather 22 October 2017 17: 10 New
        +5
        Quote: Vadim237
        These tanks and infantry fighting vehicles will go on the assault on the 38th parallel.

        yah??? if anyone remains alive ... that is unlikely ...
        1. Vadim237
          Vadim237 22 October 2017 23: 18 New
          0
          What will happen to them?
      2. Settlement Oparyshev
        Settlement Oparyshev 22 October 2017 19: 32 New
        0
        These tanks will go to Russia. Have you not heard of Eastern treachery?
  2. Livonetc
    Livonetc 22 October 2017 16: 34 New
    +5
    Well, so easy to solve.
    New contract with Russia and spare parts and ammunition.
    1. demiurg
      demiurg 22 October 2017 16: 38 New
      0
      Quote: Livonetc
      Well, so easy to solve.
      New contract with Russia and spare parts and ammunition.

      If everything is so simple. It's time to change the MSA, to modernize the remote sensing. Expensive however.
      1. verner1967
        verner1967 22 October 2017 16: 42 New
        +3
        Quote: demiurg
        Expensive however.

        Who cares? You do not confuse our skinny budget with the budget of the UK. They will buy a new set of tanks with behi, if necessary.
        1. shans2
          shans2 22 October 2017 16: 58 New
          +5
          Russia does not have a skinny military budget) more than South Korean)
          1. verner1967
            verner1967 22 October 2017 17: 19 New
            0
            Quote: shans2
            Russia does not have a skinny military budget) more than South Korean)

            Firstly, I had in mind the budget in general, and secondly, which armed forces are in the South Caucasus and which are ours, in terms of the ratio they have a larger military budget.
            1. igorj 51
              igorj 51 22 October 2017 21: 37 New
              0
              Firstly, I had in mind the budget in general, and secondly, what kind of aircraft do the SC have and what do we have

              Incidentally, South Korea’s armed forces are not much smaller than the Russian ones. But their military budget is still less than the Russian one and significantly.
              1. verner1967
                verner1967 22 October 2017 22: 03 New
                +1
                Quote: igorj 51
                Firstly, I had in mind the budget in general, and secondly, what kind of aircraft do the SC have and what do we have

                Incidentally, South Korea’s armed forces are not much smaller than the Russian ones. But their military budget is still less than the Russian one and significantly.

                Where did you get the data from? As of 2012 (the largest military expenditures of the Russian Federation in absolute terms) $ 31 billion for 650 million people in the South Caucasus and $ 15 billion for 940 million people in the Russian Federation, feel the difference. Koreans can change the entire tank fleet of the country, and we can hardly upgrade part.
                1. Astoria
                  Astoria 22 October 2017 22: 55 New
                  0
                  $ 31 billion for 650 million people in the UK and $ 15 billion for 940 million people in the Russian Federation
                  what do you mean by hundreds of millions of people.
                  The budget of the South Caucasus defense in 17 is about 35 bln $.
                2. Setrac
                  Setrac 23 October 2017 01: 10 New
                  0
                  Quote: verner1967
                  As of 2012 (the largest military expenditures of the Russian Federation in absolute terms) $ 31 billion for 650 million people in the South Caucasus and $ 15 billion for 940 million people in the Russian Federation, feel the difference.

                  And you compare the purchased equipment. It is not necessary to consider everything "in parrots".
                  1. verner1967
                    verner1967 23 October 2017 05: 49 New
                    0
                    Quote: Setrac
                    And you compare the purchased equipment.

                    and you compare the potential and size of countries, as well as the size of the aircraft.
                    Quote: Setrac
                    It is not necessary to consider everything "in parrots".

                    that's it, I compare in relative terms.
                    1. Setrac
                      Setrac 23 October 2017 10: 00 New
                      0
                      Quote: verner1967
                      and you compare the potential and size of countries, as well as the size of the aircraft.

                      If they are so miserable - why did you even start this comparison?
                      Quote: verner1967
                      that's it, I compare in relative terms.

                      And it is necessary in absolute - in tanks, guns, planes, helicopters, ships, submarines, in GLONAS in the end.
                      Compared to the Russian armed forces, the Korean army is just a baby in the sandbox.
                      1. verner1967
                        verner1967 23 October 2017 17: 20 New
                        0
                        Quote: Setrac
                        If they are so miserable

                        For their country and region, they are quite a
                        Quote: Setrac
                        why did you even start this comparison?

                        Quote: shans2
                        Russia does not have a skinny military budget) more than South Korean)

                        not I started
                        Quote: Setrac
                        And it is necessary in absolute

                        who needs? If you are assigned a budget of $ 3 per day for feeding an elephant and a mouse, then it will be a lot for a mouse, and a little for an elephant, so that's about it. Try to think again.
                3. igorj 51
                  igorj 51 23 October 2017 04: 06 New
                  0
                  Where did you get the data from?

                  Where are you from...?
                  As of 2012 year

                  You would have taken the data for 2002 and compared with 2017 ....
                  Koreans can change the entire tank fleet of the country, and we can hardly upgrade part.

                  So they can’t. Could have changed.
                  1. verner1967
                    verner1967 23 October 2017 05: 48 New
                    0
                    Quote: igorj 51
                    Could have changed.

                    Have you read the article carefully?
                    However, the implementation of this plan may be postponed indefinitely due to the lack of an alternative to date.
                    They can. The only delay is that they cannot find alternatives to the T-80.
                    Quote: igorj 51
                    You would have taken the data for 2002 and compared with 2017 ....

                    I compared the data for the year in which our military budget reached a peak, in the 17th the discrepancies were even greater and not in our favor.
                    1. igorj 51
                      igorj 51 23 October 2017 06: 16 New
                      0
                      The only delay is that they cannot find alternatives to the T-80.

                      Never mind a delay .. There is no alternative ..! Do you sometimes turn on your head .. (c) Uh
                      it just confirms my words that they can’t. Since there is no alternative
                      .
                      in the 17th discrepancy is even greater and not in our favor.

                      Those. In your opinion, in 2017 the military budget of Russia is less than in 2012 ..? You wanted to say that ..?
                      1. verner1967
                        verner1967 23 October 2017 17: 31 New
                        0
                        Quote: igorj 51
                        Never mind a delay .. There is no alternative ..! Do you sometimes turn on your head.

                        read the article
                        Quote: igorj 51
                        just confirms my words that they can’t

                        what are the smart words lol and you did not ask the Koreans there is no alternative in cost or in combat effectiveness? Worthless these words.
                        Quote: igorj 51
                        Those. In your opinion, in 2017 the military budget of Russia is less than in 2012 ..?

                        it’s not in my opinion, but in the state budget. Firstly, you can see it directly, and secondly, if you read VO, then you would have guessed it yourself if the deadlines are always shifted to the right, some programs are reduced, or even simply minimized.
                        Quote: igorj 51
                        Do you sometimes turn on your head ..
      2. Kent0001
        Kent0001 22 October 2017 19: 11 New
        0
        What for. Against what Eun now has, these T-80s are finally fire.
      3. Captain Pushkin
        Captain Pushkin 22 October 2017 20: 32 New
        0
        Quote: demiurg
        demiurg Today, 16:38 ↑ New
        Quote: Livonetc
        Well, so easy to solve.
        New contract with Russia and spare parts and ammunition.

        If everything is so simple. It's time to change the MSA, to modernize the remote sensing. Expensive however.

        Well, ordering from the Russian Federation the development of a new air defense system is not expensive (we did it for the Koreans, but took a closer look, it came in handy for us. They called the S-350), and is it expensive to upgrade three dozen tanks? Nude ...
    2. alexmach
      alexmach 22 October 2017 17: 23 New
      +1
      Yeah, and then these same tanks with whom will go to fight then?
  3. izya top
    izya top 22 October 2017 16: 39 New
    +1
    due to the lack of alternatives to date.
    the Yankees will show you the lack of an alternative angryexplain that there is no beast better than abrams
    1. pjastolov
      pjastolov 22 October 2017 16: 54 New
      13
      Quote: iza top
      due to the lack of alternatives to date.
      the Yankees will show you the lack of an alternative angryexplain that there is no beast better than abrams

      1. Mavrikiy
        Mavrikiy 22 October 2017 17: 16 New
        +2
        On the last frame the inscription: "I can!"
        1. pjastolov
          pjastolov 22 October 2017 17: 25 New
          +7
          Quote: Mavrikiy
          On the last frame the inscription: "I can!"

          Nope, I can’t laughing
          1. Svarog51
            Svarog51 22 October 2017 18: 27 New
            +7
            Volodya, welcome hi Yes, Abrams can fly, only for a short time and not far. The problem with overfeeding, who will raise such a carcass? And the result of a landing in the photo. And if "set aside laughter", then at an exhibition in Abu Dhabi, Abrams "demonstrated" how they can "take off their shoes" repeating the program of the Russian tank. In YouTube, this incident was removed, so as not to disgrace America. So from the Russian spoke T-90. The engine is different there.
            1. pjastolov
              pjastolov 22 October 2017 18: 32 New
              +5
              Sergei hi so the T-80s are now being upgraded quite well and the new engines
              1. Svarog51
                Svarog51 22 October 2017 20: 02 New
                +7
                Volodya, only the silhouette changed, we didn’t forget the instructions. good drinks
              2. Vadim237
                Vadim237 22 October 2017 23: 19 New
                0
                This tank already has a dynamic defense appeared and KAZ Trophy.
            2. Mih1974
              Mih1974 23 October 2017 03: 26 New
              +1
              Abrams "flies" usually "in parts" repeat


              laughing first minute - the flight is normal good
    2. family
      family tree 22 October 2017 16: 57 New
      +3
      Quote: iza top
      what is better than the abrams of the beast no

      Yes they burn, and the Kurds are burning these self-propelled guns
      1. pjastolov
        pjastolov 22 October 2017 17: 31 New
        +6
        Quote: perepilka
        Yes they burn, and the Kurds are burning these self-propelled guns

        but they also say that tanks are not afraid of dirt lol
        1. Doliva63
          Doliva63 22 October 2017 17: 55 New
          +5
          Well, at the school, I remember 64 in the fall so they managed to drown in a swamp that she cooked there until spring. So - anything can happen!
          1. Svarog51
            Svarog51 22 October 2017 18: 32 New
            +8
            Vlentin, welcome hi I will lose it. In our swamp a multi-wheeled conveyor stuck in the 90s, wintered and left. I don’t know the details, but I saw it with my own eyes.
            1. Doliva63
              Doliva63 22 October 2017 22: 23 New
              +4
              Salute, Sergey! hi Well, not enough time for everything repeat As a young man, I somehow decided to go fishing - to jump onto the BTR river. And what? My shore is high, the one is 3-4 meters lower, the river is 8 meters wide, I guess. If you accelerate properly, it would seem, what is the problem? And the problem was that that shore was a swamp, which was not on the map and was not visible visually. And the APC sat down tight. Yes, even with such overclocking! laughing The idiocy of the situation was that after 100 meters there was a normal exit and a pontoon lay, but there was a turn to it - a reconnaissance company on infantry fighting vehicles and armored personnel carriers, I just did not want to wait. As a result, having crossed the river, these BMPs pulled me out for almost an hour laughing drinks And so he could stay for the winter laughing
              1. Svarog51
                Svarog51 23 October 2017 08: 50 New
                +7
                Valentine hi I look at Kulchytsky’s laurels. They didn’t let anyone sleep. lol
                As a young man, I somehow decided to go for a swim - to jump onto an APC river. And what?
                He waved, so am I worse? wink
                good drinks
      2. izya top
        izya top 22 October 2017 17: 34 New
        +1
        Quote: perepilka
        Yes they burn, and the Kurds are burning these self-propelled guns

        so, what is that? are you against the most democratic democracy? angry the most exceptional cannot be request Yes, for that price fellow or can? what
        py.sy.health hi
        1. family
          family tree 22 October 2017 18: 28 New
          +2
          Quote: iza top
          are you against the most democratic democracy?

          Yes, man! I remember, one general, well, I rephrase.
          Democratic officer, it's like a Jewish reindeer herder laughing
          1. izya top
            izya top 22 October 2017 18: 32 New
            +1
            Quote: perepilka
            I remember one general

            Well, if we recall the generals ...
            -Comrade officers, I ask you not to call Pindos Pindos-they are offended laughing
  4. family
    family tree 22 October 2017 16: 43 New
    +5
    Is that black panther not taking off? what
    A stone flower does not come out, nefiga is not Danila the master?
  5. andrewkor
    andrewkor 22 October 2017 16: 50 New
    0
    But Chinese shells are not easier to buy, but in Russia you sleep .. are you?
    1. Sharansky
      Sharansky 22 October 2017 23: 38 New
      0
      it’s probably easier not to breed zoo technology
      1. Mih1974
        Mih1974 23 October 2017 03: 40 New
        0
        And when they agreed to accept them - what did they think?
        1. Sharansky
          Sharansky 23 October 2017 12: 30 New
          0
          They thought it was better to pick up tanks than to write off debt, like Africa and other Venezuelans with North Korea.
  6. Hurricane70
    Hurricane70 22 October 2017 16: 52 New
    0
    Quote: verner1967
    Quote: demiurg
    Expensive however.

    Who cares? You do not confuse our skinny budget with the budget of the UK. They will buy a new set of tanks with behi, if necessary.

    How skinny is our budget? Is it likely they are the best rockets and the best rocket engines produce? A tenth of the sanctions imposed on us (I mean not children’s, but real ones, for example by technology) should be assigned to the South Caucasus and their bold budget will be blown away in six months !!! And we are going forward! So that...
    1. igorj 51
      igorj 51 23 October 2017 04: 11 New
      0
      A tenth of the sanctions imposed on us (I mean not children’s, but real

      And it’s better a tenth of the sanctions not imposed on you but on their northern neighbors .. Then I would see what will become of their budget ..
  7. Fedorov
    Fedorov 22 October 2017 16: 55 New
    +3
    Damn the problem, they lack spare parts, by Korean standards a penny cost. Send a couple of Russian techies with quays, they will fix everything in a month, they will also teach Koreans-technicians to swear ... And Katyusha will sing.
    No, Well, they would have bought their Black Panther - the problems will increase tenfold.
    1. karabas-barabas
      karabas-barabas 22 October 2017 21: 36 New
      0
      There are already 100 of them in the army.
  8. Mavrikiy
    Mavrikiy 22 October 2017 17: 05 New
    +2
    Seoul may delay the decommissioning of the Russian T-80U
    No, no, nafig, nafig, died so died (from a joke) repeat
    Lee Jung Gol noted difficulties in repairing the T-80U by Korean specialists
    It turned out that Korean specialists had a "round nose", they disappointed. sad
  9. sabakina
    sabakina 22 October 2017 17: 28 New
    +3
    Seoul may delay the decommissioning of the Russian T-80U

    People, translate into Russian obscene, but about nifiga is not clear!
    1. izya top
      izya top 22 October 2017 17: 37 New
      +1
      Quote: sabakina
      Seoul may delay the decommissioning of the Russian T-80U

      People, translate into Russian obscene, but about nifiga is not clear!

      tongue
    2. Fedorov
      Fedorov 22 October 2017 17: 42 New
      +2
      Smirnov Oleg or Roma Skomorokhov will be banned immediately, I think it’s not worth translating into Russian obscene.
      1. Rurikovich
        Rurikovich 22 October 2017 17: 47 New
        +2
        Quote: Fedorov
        Smirnov Oleg or Roma Skomorokhov will be banned immediately, I think it’s not worth translating into Russian obscene.

        I confirm fellow The great and mighty is so great and powerful that it can be interpreted in different ways ...
        1. izya top
          izya top 22 October 2017 18: 02 New
          +4
          Quote: Rurikovich
          Quote: Fedorov
          Smirnov Oleg or Roma Skomorokhov will be banned immediately, I think it’s not worth translating into Russian obscene.

          I confirm fellow The great and mighty is so great and powerful that it can be interpreted in different ways ...

          1. IL-18
            IL-18 22 October 2017 20: 22 New
            +2
            There Anastasia (Tuman) is still fussing, I even announced a Pancake week round product with dots instead of beech ... In short, I killed forever. love
        2. Svarog51
          Svarog51 22 October 2017 18: 38 New
          +9
          The great and mighty is so great and powerful that it can be interpreted in different ways ...
          Because he is powerful, which is not interpreted differently. Where he sent the adversary, even in this direction, and moves. In the alternative, only the conductor is Ivan Susanin. wink
    3. family
      family tree 22 October 2017 20: 22 New
      +1
      Quote: sabakina
      People, translate into Russian obscene,

      Finally, the Russian military field, well, or the Russian command, not on this site
    4. Svarog51
      Svarog51 23 October 2017 08: 59 New
      +7
      Glory, welcome hi
      People, translate into Russian obscene, but about nifiga is not clear!

      I'll try: Pee-pee ... sold ... wee-pee-pee ... it would be necessary to return ... pee-pee-pee ... don't want to, like ... pee-pee-pee .. What are we going to do? Pi-and-and-and-and-and!
  10. Doliva63
    Doliva63 22 October 2017 17: 58 New
    +4
    Thinking of comparing 80s with their counterparts in the course of a database with the DPRK? Tricky, however! bully
  11. nivander
    nivander 22 October 2017 18: 20 New
    0
    But you can sell it back to the Russian Federation, ours have already offered twice. We have their turn. Uganda has 50 similar panzers (in a shaggy kit), but wants the same. The available ones are all painted by the piece. By the way, the Koreans came up with an offer to our Moscow Region with an offer to buy ZH and B \ L - the Ukrainians responded, but they were immediately sent to Eun
  12. cat hippopotamus
    cat hippopotamus 22 October 2017 18: 46 New
    0
    So what, after all, it is possible to upgrade cars.
  13. IQ12NHJ21az
    IQ12NHJ21az 22 October 2017 19: 29 New
    +1
    Choto is there with a "very black panther," South Koreans are darkening. If rearmament, then some part of the 80s can be used for spare parts, but they want spare parts - it’s not a matter of rearmament, but what? Apparently the "black panther" still can not jump over the T-80, and something or somewhere stalled with them. Probably the problems with the Black Panther are quite serious if there was an idea to buy spare parts for the T-80 - there is nothing to replace even a small amount of T-80, and the Panther is losing the T-80 at this stage. I think so.
  14. 16112014nk
    16112014nk 22 October 2017 20: 49 New
    0
    Seoul may postpone withdrawal
    And he will do it very right!
  15. Ilja2016
    Ilja2016 22 October 2017 21: 25 New
    0
    Where did they get our T-80s? I don’t understand
    1. corporal
      corporal 22 October 2017 22: 57 New
      0
      Quote: Ilja2016
      Where did they get our T-80s?

      The article generally states:
      T-80U tanks and BMP-3 armored vehicles were delivered to the Republic of Korea in 1995 and 2002 as a payment of the USSR state debt.
      1. Mordvin 3
        Mordvin 3 22 October 2017 23: 31 New
        +4
        We owe them half a billion more. And this despite the fact that the USSR recognized Korea in 1990. for a bribe in 200 thousand. Gorbachev hang a little.
  16. The leader of the Redskins
    The leader of the Redskins 22 October 2017 21: 25 New
    0
    In an extreme case, you can always bury and create a fortification like a bunker ...
  17. Dargavs
    Dargavs 22 October 2017 22: 33 New
    0
    Most likely they received a persistent offer to acquire a North American service, and with that, and they only have enough money for one thing, so they are trying to get out. Here we have to make such an advantageous offer (at least for maintenance) that they would refuse very difficult. wink
  18. kunstkammer
    kunstkammer 22 October 2017 22: 35 New
    0
    on account of payment of the state debt of the USSR

    All countries of the world are paid for the happy prosperity of the Soviet people. And we living at that time did not even guess ...
    Here is an ungrateful Soviet man on a simple sausage Possessed? Have you exchanged millions of dollars from different countries for chaff?
    The last question: Where are Grinu Delhi?
  19. LeonidL
    LeonidL 23 October 2017 02: 09 New
    0
    Difficulties in repairing Russian equipment for Koreans are overcome by verbal mastery of Russian linguistics!
  20. Wolka
    Wolka 23 October 2017 14: 14 New
    0
    they did it first of all for themselves, darlings, which means they did well, whoever tried it knows that ...
  21. Setrac
    Setrac 23 October 2017 21: 35 New
    0
    Quote: verner1967
    who needs? If you are assigned a budget of $ 3 per day for feeding an elephant and a mouse, then it will be a lot for a mouse, and a little for an elephant, so that's about it. Try to think again.

    You know, if bananas will cost a cent per ton, for three dollars I will feed a whole herd of elephants, this is your relative comparison. Aren't you embarrassed that a Korean tank "for its own" costs three times more than a Russian tank on the foreign market? And Korea simply does not have many important components of the military component.