The Chinese army will become the strongest in the world

21
At the congress of the Communist Party of China, international issues do not occupy a large place, but already on the first day, Xi Jinping’s report made two important statements: about world hegemony and the Chinese army. One of them can even be called sensational, if you follow not the letter, but the spirit of what has been said. And it directly concerns the fact that in a few years it will be the Chinese army.

The Chinese army will become the strongest in the world




The report of the General Secretary of the Central Committee at the XIX Party Congress lasted three and a half hours - and the key figures in it were 2035 and 2050. These years are stages on the way to the "great rebirth of the Chinese nation."

The first date is the time for the completion of socialist modernization, and the second is the time for turning China "into a rich, powerful, democratic, harmonious, civilized, modernized socialist state." That is, by the centenary of the proclamation of the People’s Republic of China, the Chinese dream must come true and the country must “become great again”, in the words of Trump.

At the same time, China’s ambitions are not only real, but also completely natural - most of their stories China was the biggest power of the world in every sense. It is only in our Eurocentric view that seems surprising. But an objective analysis suggests that over 4 thousands of years of its history (this is a proven minimum), China has experienced many neighboring and distant civilizations, including those who claimed to be on a global scale, and retained their independence and self-sufficiency.

Not only its population, but also the economy were the largest in the world, even two centuries ago making up a third of the global volume. Just in the XVIII century, the country started having problems, aggravated by the fact that in the XIX century it was forcibly opened the world. The West, which came to the coast of China fully armed, took advantage of internal crises, aggravated and provoked them, put the Chinese on opium and eventually made the great country their semi-colony.

For nearly a century, Chinese distemper continued from the middle of the nineteenth to the middle of the twentieth centuries, and over the last 40 years the actual disintegration of the country occurred. With the creation of the People's Republic of China, the country began to revive, but in the middle of the 1960-s again fell into the small confusion of the "cultural revolution" - and only at the end of the 1970-s did it enter a sustainable growth trajectory.

Over the past 40 years, China has made a huge leap - but, on the other hand, it just returned to its rightful place in the world. I restored the lost, becoming before our eyes the main power of the world. It already has the largest economy in the world and the highest growth rates in the world, the world's largest population and the most ambitious plans. In a good way, ambitious. China does not claim to world dominance, the fact to replace America as a global hegemon. More precisely, it will inevitably replace - and is already replacing it as the strongest - but all the time emphasizes that it will not become the new global hegemon.

So at the XIX Congress, Xi Jinping said that China would never pursue an expansion policy and would not sacrifice the interests of other countries for its own benefit:

"Whatever level of development China has attained, it will never claim to be a hegemon."

Well, of course, they say kitafeboby, this is all a lulling Chinese melody. And as soon as they become the strongest in everything, they will immediately turn into new Americans, dictate their conditions, seize territories and impose their customs.

It is clear that Russia, which has a wealth of experience in relations with Europe and the West as a whole, is used to measuring everything in the Western manner, but the Chinese geopolitical strategy is just as different from the Western one as the Chinese civilization is from the European one. The Chinese do not impose their values ​​on anyone. Including because they consider all nations different and, to put it mildly, inferior to the Chinese in development, they do not seek to control the whole world through military force, diplomacy and covert operations.

The Chinese seek to gain control over trade and various businesses in foreign countries, but it all depends on the strength of the rival partner, and not on the strength of Beijing’s pressure. Russia, for example, has nothing to fear of any form of "Chinese expansion," if we in each joint business with the Chinese clearly and intelligently defend our national interests. Our countries do not have unrecoverable contradictions - and there are many truly mutually beneficial and strategically important common affairs.

The fact that the rise of China is objective and inevitable is already understood by the Anglo-Saxons for a long time, but they have a completely different relationship with the Middle Kingdom. And the problem here is not in the Chinese. For almost 40 years, competent American analysts have been talking about the inevitability of the American-Chinese clash in the struggle for global dominance - and this is only partly true.

Yes, China is challenging America - but only because it does not just lay claim to world hegemony, but also tries to act as if we live in an “American-style world.” The US has been holding back China since the proclamation of the PRC, and although in the post-war period they were much more engaged in confrontation with the USSR, already at the end of 1980, after reconciliation with Moscow, the “Chinese question” again became the key issue for the USA.

A mere glance at a map to understand how the United States in a military sense, literally besieged China. Especially in the east and southeast direction, from Japan and Korea to the South China Sea. In a great country, whose economy also depends on the import of energy resources and the export of goods, such a “blockade” naturally causes nothing but irritation. And the desire to break the shackles - which, undoubtedly, will be done. And in an informal alliance with Russia, which, as well as China, is interested in changing the existing world order.

But if Russia traditionally holds an active foreign policy, China has also traditionally been publicly adheres extremely cautious tactics. This is due to a number of reasons. Now we can single out the one that China does not want to reveal its plans until the moment when it will be useless to hide them. Such tactics are quite arbitrary - after all, Atlantic geopolitics see what is happening in reality.

And it is not only an active Russian-Chinese rapprochement, but also a major program of modernization of the Chinese army. Xi Jinping also spoke about it at the congress.

“We have reached a new historical key point in strengthening national defense and the armed forces ... We must fully implement the party’s ideas on strengthening the army to enter the new era and adapt the military strategy to the new conditions. Build a strong and modern army, navy, air force, ground forces, as well as strategic support forces ...

We'll do it our mission to 2035 year to modernize our national defense and the armed forces has been basically completed. And by the middle of this century, it is necessary to turn the People’s Army of China into armed forces of the advanced world level. ”

These words have already caused a bit of a stir - the fact is that some media have translated the "advanced world level" as "the strongest in the world." If Xi really said that by 2050, the Chinese army would be the strongest in the world, it would be a sensation. Not because it is surprising or outrageous, but because the Chinese never say anything that could be used to accuse them of their claims to world domination. They do not want him - but who doubts that the United States would immediately have seized upon such a statement and would have declared it a threat to American and international interests.

At the same time, the United States not only constantly emphasizes that they have the strongest army in the world (which corresponds to reality since 1991), but they constantly state that they will not allow anyone to become stronger than them. Well, in general, what is allowed to Jupiter ... Naturally, neither China nor Russia disagree with this - but Russia does not need to arrange an arms race with the United States. We have nuclear weapon, ground forces are being modernized, updated aviation and the fleet - for now, that's enough for us. But China, which needs to print its own borders, straighten its shoulders at least in the zone of its own national interests, simply cannot do this without squeezing the United States out of it. Therefore, accelerated military construction is for Beijing the only possible option to achieve the "Chinese dream".

So Xi Jinping, speaking of the achievement of the “advanced world level” by the Chinese army in 2050, really meant that it would become the strongest in the world. And there is no doubt that it will. The strength of the Chinese economy, the funds allocated to the army (and the official military budget shows only a fraction of the costs), and, most importantly, the weapons issue program for the coming decades leaves no doubt about it. By 2050, China will have the world's largest fleet (including more than a dozen aircraft carriers) and the largest air force in the world. This is what is needed to extrude the United States from the Pacific. At the same time, the United States itself all these years will gradually lose ground not only in this region (which, by the way, becomes the most important), but also in the world as a whole. So it is likely that the case of the Sino-American war will not come.

Well, what about the option of provoking a “war ahead of time” that Great Britain applied to Germany in 1914 (in London it was understood that the German construction program fleet will inevitably lead to the empire losing control of the oceans), the United States will not work for China.

Only the internal crisis and the new unrest in China can prevent the Chinese army from taking the first position in the world. But the CCP is doing everything to prevent this from happening. Including carefully studying the Soviet experience: from the October Revolution to the collapse of the USSR. And the construction of the Soviet Red Army - the most powerful army in the world in the second half of the XX century.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

21 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. 0
    21 October 2017 16: 39
    not otherwise the Yankees war with the Chinese is provided, but this is the end ...
    1. +5
      21 October 2017 17: 14
      Quote: Volka
      not otherwise the Yankees war with the Chinese is provided, but this is the end ...

      I don’t think ... The Chinese will not get to the Yankees, they are not needed for nothing .. they already squeezed them with their debts (I don’t know how the interest will be removed from the counter), but for the Yankees death will be raging for China ... or selling into slavery ... Even 50-60 years ago, the options for nuclear weapons with the Yankees were calculated ... practically with a loss of potential of 30%, the Yankees will never rise, but other countries (well then the USSR thought I think China also approaches this calculation) even with a loss of potential 50% will crawl out. And the reason is the loss of the printing press, which in any serious conflict the United States will lose forever ...
      1. 0
        22 October 2017 15: 51
        Quote: Peter Akopov
        The Chinese army will become the strongest in the world

        In the near future no, will not. Because the strength of the army is based on the wealth of the country. There are no strong armies in poor countries, for this they lack resources. Although the rich countries do not have strong armies.
        And the rating of countries by absolute wealth, he is famous:
    2. +5
      22 October 2017 00: 03
      Volka, well, are you in a cartoon?
      The United States will never get into a fight against a strong enemy, they are specialists in small countries.
      And for 17 years we have been marking the economy, the tsar will not dare to close the thieves flea market in Russia, and he keeps DAM for this - a masterpiece of economic thought.
      All oligarchs are afraid to offend, but people can be torn in three skins. Prices are rising, taxes are rising and new taxes are appearing, salaries are losing weight - and oligarchs are getting richer.
      Does the tsar really not see this, or do not want to see it, until the people rise, it’s already impossible to live in a half-poverty state!
    3. 0
      22 October 2017 13: 44
      The planning horizon for the Chinese, as a rule, is 10 thousand years, for us - 3 years. So the information is not very relevant.
  2. +1
    21 October 2017 16: 50
    They make Russia strong (on whose money is the construction of the Russian armed forces?) So that the Russian War with the PRC would weaken China as much as possible.
    I modestly recall that no one has yet canceled the genetic weapon.
    1. 0
      21 October 2017 20: 46
      Quote: pp to Oparyshev
      They make Russia strong (on whose money is the construction of the Russian armed forces?) So that the Russian War with the PRC would weaken China as much as possible.

      The hint that the US money has re-equipped us now, as in 1930-1938? Not funny.
      And the fact that the war between the Russian Federation and China is the dream of the United States is unambiguous.
      1. Say
        0
        22 October 2017 14: 47
        No funnier.
        China will decide that it will not have enough airborne assets to attack the United States and will attack Russia, and the United States will again supply arms to both.
  3. +2
    21 October 2017 18: 11
    You can talk about China’s army and armament, as well as the enormous human resources that China has, but China does not know how to fight and win. In any case, China will suck from Russia or the United States to the fullest. Even North Korea may not break China easily. Even on the world stage, China sits and does not jerk when adult uncles are talking. It is simply due to cheap labor that China has risen economically.
    1. +1
      21 October 2017 19: 07
      There is a bearded anecdote about the military power of China: for China to win, it is enough to declare war and immediately surrender.
      1. +1
        21 October 2017 19: 46
        Caucasians with Uzbeks will repulse them, trade and crime in Russia their sphere of influence
        1. +1
          21 October 2017 21: 26
          Quote: Yak28
          Caucasians with Uzbeks will repulse them, trade and crime in Russia their sphere of influence

          Bent over. And who will not be bent - will be outbid.
    2. +2
      22 October 2017 07: 53
      If China did not know how to fight and win, its territory would not be one of the largest in the world. In the scenario for today, both the Russian army and the school army, even with joint actions during the war with the PLA, will be completely cut off, because the PLA is ALREADY the strongest army in the world in terms of basic combat readiness indicators.
      1. +1
        23 October 2017 23: 26
        Quote: zoolu350
        If China did not know how to fight and win, its territory would not be one of the largest in the world. In the scenario for today, both the Russian army and the school army, even with joint actions during the war with the PLA, will be completely cut off, because the PLA is ALREADY the strongest army in the world in terms of basic combat readiness indicators.
        - And how many in this "one of the largest" areas suitable for cultivation and settlement? And how is it with water, for example? The quality and supply of equipment and components, well, there’s nothing to discuss here. And it’s hard to believe in “great military potential”. And with the "joint action" from the PLA, all the fluff and feathers will fly. I do not belittle their capabilities, this is both stupid and dangerous, but to claim that they are capable of long-term successful military operations against the United States or Russia, without an alliance with one of these countries against the other is from an “alternative history”.
  4. +2
    21 October 2017 18: 43
    "Only the internal crisis and a new turmoil in China can prevent the Chinese army from gaining the first position in the world. But the CCP is doing everything to prevent this from happening. Including carefully studying the Soviet experience: from the October Revolution to the collapse of the USSR. And the construction of the Soviet "The Red Army - the most powerful army in the world in the second half of the XX century."
    Well, let's see. laughing
  5. +3
    21 October 2017 21: 26
    Xi Jinping’s report made two important statements: on world hegemony and the Chinese army

    Greetings, the new hegemon. And if Meehan hopes that Chinese hegemony will be better than the state or some other, then he is very mistaken.
  6. +1
    22 October 2017 05: 59
    A strong economy is a strong army.
    What can I say ... But nothing ...
  7. 0
    22 October 2017 11: 43
    ... excerpts of speech at the congress of the Communist Party of China, Comrade Si ... are constantly going on in the Chinese radio ... excerpts for an hour or more ... the Chinese seriously approach this issue - they believe in the party, they believe in Comrade Si ...
  8. 0
    22 October 2017 15: 11
    Now the main thing is to be able to direct Chinese power in a positive direction ...
  9. +2
    22 October 2017 15: 44
    It’s not bad to dream and it’s not painful to puff out cheeks. Besides the civil war and the help of North Korea, the PLA has nothing behind it (I don’t even remember the funny war with Vietnam). Their mentality is bloated and everyone in China has trampled China laziness from the Mongols to the Japanese (insert those who haven’t visited there except perhaps the Finns). So the morale of the Chinese is forced through the Cinema and the media on one postulate (which reminds me of the Red Dogs ’speech from Mowgli) - We are many, Us more, We will trample you. Yeah
  10. 0
    25 October 2017 13: 47
    At the same time, China's ambitions are not only real, but also completely natural - for most of its history, China was the largest power in the world in all senses.


    The ambitions of the Chinese leadership over the past 70 years have led to military solutions to conflicts.
    The Sino-Vietnamese War (1979) The Pre-emptive Defensive War against Vietnam »The invasion of Chinese troops into Vietnam.
    1969 Territorial conflict with the USSR. Soviet-Chinese border conflict on Damansky Island - armed clashes between the USSR and China on March 2 and 15, 1969 in the area of ​​Damansky Island.
    1950 Chamdo operation (Chinese 昌都 战役, October 1950) - PLA operation to defeat the Tibetan army in eastern Tibet and create conditions for the "peaceful liberation of Tibet."
    What rhetoric will be when China becomes the first power in the world is not very difficult to predict.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"