In Rostov, create a replacement for heavy-duty helicopter Mi-26

56
In Rostov-on-Don, work on the development of a prototype model of the new Mi-26Т2В helicopter for the Russian HQs entered the final stage. After that, the machine will begin to perform flight tests. This was reported in the press service of the holding "Helicopters of Russia", reports WG-Force.

The new helicopter with a payload of 20 tons should be all-weather and able to fly at any time of the day, in the conditions of fire and electronic countermeasures of the enemy. The number of crew members of the upgraded helicopter remained the same - five people.



In Rostov, create a replacement for heavy-duty helicopter Mi-26


The new helicopter will embody the latest technical solutions, taking into account the use in hostilities. I want to note that we are talking about the modernization of the military version of the Mi-26, and not the Mi-26Т2 helicopter, which is exported
- said Andrei Boginsky, Director General of the Russian Helicopters holding.

The new helicopter will be equipped with a modern integrated complex of on-board electronic equipment NPC 90-2, which provides piloting of the helicopter with automatic flight en-route. In addition, the autopilot will be able to perform pre-landing maneuvering and return to the main or alternate aerodrome.

The helicopter airborne defense complex will be protected against the destruction of the missile complexes by countering the attacking means with radio and optical-electronic guidance.
56 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +6
    20 October 2017 14: 40
    This is good, but you need your own engine, and as soon as possible.
    MI-26 T2 2015 at MAX
    1. +1
      20 October 2017 14: 59
      Quote: maxim947
      This is good, but you need your own engine, and as soon as possible.
      MI-26 T2 2015 at MAX

      And there’s a problem with that,
      1. +1
        20 October 2017 15: 16
        What's up with that? If you are talking about the engine, then there is a problem and will not be resolved soon. If you are talking about the board, then the photo is an export version, and the article about the same beautiful, only with other electronic equipment - for the aircraft
        1. 0
          20 October 2017 15: 48
          And what is the problem with the engine?
          1. +2
            20 October 2017 15: 52
            its not, in the plans PD-12V based on PD-14 which, in turn, plans for 18 years
            1. +1
              20 October 2017 18: 09
              he flies well on Sichevsky motor, everything has its time, there will be an engine and a PTV
              no sanctions will close the supply of motor-sichevsk engines in Russia
              1. +1
                20 October 2017 18: 11
                Those. for our industry this is a problem, and a priority, but not for you, well, that means you know better.)
                1. +1
                  20 October 2017 18: 15
                  That is, there is a temporary solution to the problem while there is no permanent solution to your problem?
                  1. +2
                    20 October 2017 18: 28
                    That's right, because it is not known what suppliers will throw out the next day.
  2. +4
    20 October 2017 14: 41
    Disappointment ... With all due respect to the Mi-26, it is time for him to find (create) a modern replacement.
    1. +3
      20 October 2017 14: 44
      Quote: Leader of the Redskins
      Disappointment ... With all due respect to the Mi-26, it is time for him to find (create) a modern replacement

      To do this, you must first find an engine for him in Russia, but this is a BIG problem.
    2. +12
      20 October 2017 15: 02
      Quote: Leader of the Redskins
      With all due respect to the Mi-26, it is time for him to find (create) a modern replacement.

      How is everything easy and not forced for you! Mi-26 is the most load-lifting helicopter in the world ...
      1. +1
        21 October 2017 19: 04
        Comrade is far from aviation. He has no idea what a cow is. wink
        1. 0
          21 October 2017 19: 22
          https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vvihWSlMPg8
    3. +10
      20 October 2017 15: 04
      Quote: Leader of the Redskins
      Disappointment ... With all due respect to the Mi-26, it is time for him to find (create) a modern replacement.

      And tell me, dear man, who and what has surpassed the Mi-26? Facts to the studio!
      1. +3
        20 October 2017 15: 55
        time ... which is known to spare no one
      2. 0
        21 October 2017 07: 58
        Quote: ydjin
        Tell me, dear man, who and what has surpassed the Mi-26

        And to look for laziness yourself?
        The largest mass-produced helicopter, set 14 world records.
        http://rostec.ru/news/4513109
    4. +4
      20 October 2017 16: 53
      Quote: Leader of the Redskins
      With all due respect to the Mi-26, it’s time for him to find (create) a modern replacement

      And why is the MI-26 obsolete to you? They put a new avionics, what's next? What do you think modern replacement means? Your suggestions? I dare to note that in the world there are no analogues, and you there, create a "modern" replacement.
      1. +1
        21 October 2017 05: 00
        Engines should be updated for him for a long time - they require too frequent maintenance. Yes, and hope for Ukraine today is impossible. For the rest, I think the manufacturer keeps a pulse on the pulse - and if necessary, updates avionics, and the rest that is required. According to the characteristics of the Mi-26 is still out of competition - for now, anyway.
    5. +2
      21 October 2017 01: 39
      Quote: Leader of the Redskins
      Disappointment ... With all due respect to the Mi-26, it is time for him to find (create) a modern replacement.

      “Oh my God.” Why can't a people like such a troll like you immediately appreciate it? Just look at the track record. The number of messages for the time period of all the old people and you, it becomes clear. what are you at work. So much of your plowing during the year - and all in the name of something “against”
      1. 0
        21 October 2017 09: 32
        Against? .... Yes. Against a lie. Against the "one-sided" presentation of information. Against highly raised slogans that change at the direction. Example? Turkey is an enemy, Turkey is a friend ... Ukraine is a brother, Ukraine is a Bandera.
        In general, I like the section "weapons" the most. It is the history of weapons, technology. Because modern designs are too often overgrown with prefixes "the most ..."
        Well, if it’s on “Trolls”, then I don’t throw such labels, but I also noticed that there was (was) a participant called “Department”. So he “took off” to “general” not in a year, but in a couple of months it turned out and he had a plug in every barrel.
        1. The comment was deleted.
        2. 0
          22 October 2017 14: 24
          Quote: Leader of the Redskins
          Against? .... Yes. Against a lie. Against the "one-sided" presentation of information. Against highly raised slogans that change at the direction. Example? Turkey is an enemy, Turkey is a friend ... Ukraine is a brother, Ukraine is a Bandera.
          In general, I like the section "weapons" the most. It is the history of weapons, technology. Because modern designs are too often overgrown with prefixes "the most ..."
          Well, if it’s on “Trolls”, then I don’t throw such labels, but I also noticed that there was (was) a participant called “Department”. So he “took off” to “general” not in a year, but in a couple of months it turned out and he had a plug in every barrel.

          This is not the “Department”, but “Mikhan” according to his first “nickname”, he didn’t count ups, the main thing is blowing up all kinds of nonsense, and people who don’t know him plus, if you annoy him, just don’t read him, your psyche is healthier will be, I personally do so, there is always a lot of it!
    6. +1
      21 October 2017 18: 07
      Quote: Leader of the Redskins
      Disappointment ... With all due respect to the Mi-26, it is time for him to find (create) a modern replacement.

      The B-52, S-130 and Tu-95 are still in demand to this day, and they may celebrate the centenary, which means that the designers were able to create outstanding aircraft in terms of their characteristics, the same with the Mi-26, the main thing is modernization, as they say, the case when they don’t look for good from good
  3. +2
    20 October 2017 14: 44
    Time does not stand still, modernization is always present and this is only welcome
  4. +5
    20 October 2017 14: 58
    And where does the new helicopter, if it is a deep modernization? request
    1. +5
      20 October 2017 15: 10
      It is strange that they did not give a new name. And because they love. T-72BU - T-90, S-300PM3 - S-400, Mig29M2 - Mig35, Su-27BM - Su-35S
      And all the "brand new", which is characteristic
      1. +2
        20 October 2017 15: 20
        Do not worry, they will. Everything has its time.
      2. +8
        20 October 2017 15: 39
        Yeah .. iPhone both released and have been releasing the same thing for 10 years, only the number is being changed. A rectangle with rounded edges will be released in the decaying west ... laughing
      3. +1
        20 October 2017 22: 21
        Quote: Sharansky
        It is strange that they did not give a new name. And because they love. T-72BU - T-90, S-300PM3 - S-400, Mig29M2 - Mig35, Su-27BM - Su-35S
        And all the "brand new", which is characteristic

        I wonder where they got it from?
        1. 0
          21 October 2017 12: 13
          what did you scratch?
      4. 0
        21 October 2017 18: 13
        But isn’t it in the USA? for example, the same Boeing 737 has evolved from 50-737 to 100-737 in 900 years, and now the 737-MAX is being produced, and what bothers you?
        1. 0
          22 October 2017 03: 11
          What does the USA have to do with it? Do you think that the United States needs to copy their most moronic things? Who are they, owners?
    2. +1
      20 October 2017 15: 17
      Quote: Proton
      And where does the new helicopter, if it is a deep modernization? request

      And how does deep modernization not correspond to the fact that it wasn’t even close by? In this segment, our so-called partners have nothing equal.
      1. 0
        22 October 2017 03: 12
        They are partners only for Putin. For everyone else, they are enemies.
    3. +2
      20 October 2017 15: 23
      New, because it will be made from scratch from almost new parts from warehouses, but according to the old drawings.
  5. +3
    20 October 2017 15: 19
    why people see the old car body and immediately start screaming how everything is out of date, how bad everything is, and they don’t think that despite the old case, the filling is completely new.
    1. +1
      21 October 2017 05: 13
      This is a question ... Boeing continues to make modifications of the same 737, and no one screams loudly that this is ancient rubbish, what a shame and the like. A successful model can be exploited for many decades. Upgrading naturally.
      1. 0
        22 October 2017 03: 24
        However, they do not call the next modification of the 737th “a completely new aircraft” and do not assign a new name to it. And here Mlyn replaced the switches on the LCD and sailed.
  6. +1
    20 October 2017 15: 28
    Comrades, tell me the crew. It is unclear why 5 people.
    1. +2
      20 October 2017 15: 42
      ChSH, civilian crew of the Mi-26T2 consists of 2 + 1 people.
    2. +2
      20 October 2017 16: 59
      After modernization, that is, with new avionics and equipment, the Mi-26 crew has long been reduced to 2 people who can successfully cope with the entire range of work on this helicopter. Well, maybe the flight engineer can still be turned on.
      The number of crew members of the modernized helicopter remained the same - five people.
      This was written by a person who is clearly not in the know about the latest developments in the world of aviation.
      1. +1
        21 October 2017 05: 20
        Well, how would a military modification, no? For instance. In the tractor, one person is enough, and in the tank 3-4 people ride. Mess...
    3. 0
      21 October 2017 11: 08
      Gregory_78, Orionvit, Soran,
      Thank you for your answers, it is a pity that the question has not been resolved.
  7. +1
    20 October 2017 15: 28
    New 20 Ton Helicopter

    And if the case is "blinded" from composites, how much will it be?
    It is certainly more expensive, because it will increase the range, carrying capacity, altitude.
    The machine will be even “tastier”.
    1. 0
      21 October 2017 05: 29
      At Discovery, I watched a movie about helicopters. Mi-26 Americans could not put in the first place, as you yourself understand. But he took a place in the top five. The phrase from the movie that struck me - "the number of composites used in the production of this helicopter is amazing for that time and will allow it to remain competitive for a long time." And the weak point is called engines, which by modern standards require very frequent and time-consuming maintenance by highly qualified specialists, as a result of which the cost of flight hours increases significantly.
  8. 0
    20 October 2017 15: 36
    The Mi-26 was already a great replacement for the Mi-12. But Putin’s Russia has decided to steal money and therefore will not create anything surprising. The money allocated for development will be stolen and will modernize the same Mi-26, passing it off as a brand new helicopter.
    1. +3
      20 October 2017 15: 59
      All of these “excellent replacements” for old proven technology require a very careful, close examination. For the old samples were created by full-fledged design bureaus with wholesale and continuity. They destroyed the design bureau, and even before your unloved "Putin Russia." A new generation of designers can often only create beautiful concepts on a monitor screen ....
    2. KCA
      0
      20 October 2017 19: 53
      And what kind of helicopter MI-12? I have never heard of this, there was an experimental V-12, but it had so many flaws that he was not destined to become MI-12 even in the USSR, or even in Putin's Russia, where it was accepted to count money
    3. 0
      21 October 2017 05: 36
      Mi-12 is not a replacement for Mi-26. Just like the An-225 is not a replacement for the An-124. An-225 - like hot cakes? With the Mi-12 it would be even worse. But the An-225 was needed, and therefore went into operation. And the Mi-12, despite two finished copies, did not go into operation. The need for such a helicopter was gone, it was not needed.
  9. +3
    20 October 2017 15: 54
    I wonder how many decades we will upgrade the Soviet models? When will such masterpieces appear in free democratic Russia? Something democracy is not very creative
    1. +5
      20 October 2017 16: 04
      How many decades will we upgrade Soviet models?

      Touched the Soviet Union for a long time to draw. Well done, the Communists nevertheless managed to organize work, so that they would not talk about them.
      1. +2
        20 October 2017 17: 01
        I would say they had nowhere to go! Since the 17th year they have lived under sanctions. Had a good time however! We are only three years old ....
        1. +1
          20 October 2017 17: 14
          [quote] [Got it however! / quote]
          Smiled

          I agree on 1000%. We can no worse.
        2. +1
          21 October 2017 05: 52
          Russia is always under sanctions, no matter how they are called - the Jason-Venik law, the Magnitsky law, the sale of machine tools only for grain - and so on.

          Only increases in sanction pressure cause disturbances that remain in history. Russia later gets used and lives under sanctions for decades. The lifting of sanctions is taken almost for granted, so it leaves no noticeable trace in history.
        3. 0
          21 October 2017 11: 15
          Quote: SpaceCom
          I would say they had nowhere to go! Since the 17th year they have lived under sanctions. Had a good time however! We are only three years old ....

          Moreover, the current sanctions are babble compared to those.
  10. The comment was deleted.
  11. 0
    20 October 2017 23: 39
    Quote: NKVD
    There was already a wonderful replacement for the Mi-26 is the Mi-12.

    Actually, two inaccuracies. MI-12 has never been. He remained the B-12. But the perfect replacement for the MI-26 is how? "12" was created in the late 60s, "26" - in the late 70s. MI-26 was created as a replacement for MI-6 and, in principle, because the B-12 did not go ...

    If only the Rostov helicopter would have been taken out of the city somewhere, it would have been very good (as they are doing with the airport)
  12. 0
    22 October 2017 07: 35
    In addition to the Soviet helicopters ... their modifications and options that were still in the USSR ... in the current ..you have been over 25 years - NOTHING! not created.
    Only beautiful pictures - Wishlist and modernization of the "communist heritage"
    ... Eeeeeh are not able, only to trade the natural resources of this country, what was created by the Soviet people ... and capable of ... hmm ... descendants.
  13. The comment was deleted.