Military Review

Japanese media: the United States will not stand in the war against China

56
The US is not in a hurry to recognize China’s military and economic superiority; nevertheless, Americans need to come to terms with the idea that they will not stand in the war against China, the Japanese newspaper The Japan Times believes.




The economic potential of China does not raise any doubts. The economy of China will continue to grow and will achieve even greater success in the near future. But what about military power?

“It seems that the US continues to dominate the military sphere. Washington spends gigantic sums on its armed forces and has a huge nuclear arsenal. It is worth considering the impressive combat experience of the American army, which it was able to accumulate due to participation in military conflicts in the territory of the Middle East. But this does not mean that the Pentagon will win the war ", - leads the article PolitRussia.

If a protracted military conflict happens (without the use of nuclear weapons), then China has more chances to come out of this confrontation as a winner. As an example, the author pointed to the confrontation between the United States and Japan in the Second World War.

“At the beginning of the war, the Japanese outnumbered the American fleet by the number of their aircraft carriers. Tokyo possessed an experienced army that had previously participated in hostilities in China. But in the end, the United States significantly outstripped its adversary, ”the newspaper notes.

China’s advances in stealth technology, directed energy weapons, as well as hypersonic rockets, demonstrate that its military technology is not all that far from the United States. According to the author, “in a protracted war, as soon as the mighty Chinese rink reaches the peak of its power, it will be impossible to stop it”.

In other words, today China is in a position similar to that of the USA at the beginning of the 20 of the 20th century - “a formidable superpower that has not yet found a reason to demonstrate its dominance,” the newspaper concludes.
Photos used:
http://www.globallookpress.com
56 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. himRa
    himRa 20 October 2017 14: 40 New
    +3
    And you are doing it right! What bzd ... are afraid but you are mistaken!
    1. pjastolov
      pjastolov 20 October 2017 14: 48 New
      +7
      Quote: himRa
      And you are doing it right! What bzd ... are afraid but you are mistaken!

      Rahim hi and maybe they’re not mistaken, even in a nuclear collision it is not known who will win - China does not report how much nuclear weapons it has request
      1. oldseaman1957
        oldseaman1957 20 October 2017 14: 50 New
        0
        Japanese media: the United States will not stand in the war against China
        - The Japanese are closer, they know better!
        1. hrych
          hrych 20 October 2017 17: 12 New
          0
          Quote: oldseaman1957
          The Japanese are closer, they know better!
          Japanese newspaper in English. You understand that in a Japanese-speaking country it has a dead circulation and a sluggish authority wassat
          Not the Japanese, but the Japanese newspaper The Japan Times believes. laughing
          China's advances in stealth technology, energy weapons, and hypersonic missiles demonstrate that its military technology is not that far from the United States.
          Ha ha ha China has nothing at all laughing In the United States, it is only stealth technology, and hypersound is not given to them, it is rather a topic for Russians. And the energy weapon is a fairy tale, it is lasers, masers, etc. Nothing shines at all for the Chinese there. Okay, there the USSR and the USA did laser planes and so forth. And these are where. And the destruction of the nuclear centers in Sichuan and the Japanese themselves in Fukushima is the work of either the United States or the same Russians. Here, after all, like, perhaps, an accident, an earthquake always takes place to be, but when a disarming blow is delivered and right on target, even skeptics should think
      2. himRa
        himRa 20 October 2017 14: 58 New
        +4
        Colleague hi
        As soon as the staff members feel the real danger immediately, they will “strangle” the Chinese, for example, India. They will not betray with someone themselves because they owe a lot to China ... more than anyone ... from potential opponents.
        Films, fiction, revised yap ... drinks
        1. pjastolov
          pjastolov 20 October 2017 15: 01 New
          +5
          Quote: himRa
          for example india

          so they already have disputed territories, but so far they won’t
          1. Orionvit
            Orionvit 20 October 2017 16: 47 New
            0
            Quote: pjastolov
            so they already have disputed territories, but so far they won’t

            States are used to raking in heat with the wrong hands. They will not fight with China, but play off with Russia, this is their cherished dream. Russia and China seem to have no disputed territories, but China, by its "simplicity of mind," looks at Siberia. So this option, the states will develop in full.
            1. Lelek
              Lelek 20 October 2017 17: 25 New
              +1
              Quote: Orionvit
              They will not fight with China


              Hey. Certainly, they’ll forget ** yat, but they will "lower" them, make them dirty and threaten every day.
              1. Orionvit
                Orionvit 20 October 2017 17: 43 New
                0
                Quote: Lelek
                Hey. Certainly, they’ll forget ** yat, but they will "lower" them, make them dirty and threaten every day.

                Yes, who would doubt it. If the states stop doing their usual business, as you described, then everything’s probably going to take a break in the forest. lol
                1. Lelek
                  Lelek 20 October 2017 17: 51 New
                  0
                  Quote: Orionvit
                  Orionvit


                  Well, while the tiger and the crocodile are cursing and showing each other teeth, we will calmly sit on our baobab and do our own thing, of which we have a carriage with a trailer. yes
                  1. Orionvit
                    Orionvit 20 October 2017 18: 11 New
                    0
                    All this is understandable, but so far the tiger with a crocodile is Russia and the USA, and China is so-so, just the largest economy in the world .. But let's see what happens next.
                    1. Lelek
                      Lelek 20 October 2017 18: 18 New
                      +1
                      Quote: Orionvit
                      China is so-so, just the largest economy in the world.


                      Add the largest army and the largest mono-ethnic population of the planet.
                      1. Orionvit
                        Orionvit 20 October 2017 18: 44 New
                        0
                        Quote: Lelek
                        the largest mono-ethnic population of the planet.

                        Here I do not agree with you. China, it is like the former USSR, there are many nationalities there, as well as languages. But all the Chinese, just like during the Cold War, all the citizens of the Soviet Union for the west were Russians.
                      2. Orionvit
                        Orionvit 20 October 2017 20: 14 New
                        0
                        Quote: Lelek
                        large mono-ethnic population of the planet.

                        Sorry, I will add. Check out Wikipedia for Chinese dialects. And immediately it becomes clear where there is "mono-ethnicity." This is not Russian with Ukrainian.
                      3. Boa kaa
                        Boa kaa 20 October 2017 21: 20 New
                        +3
                        Quote: Lelek
                        the largest mono-ethnic population of the planet.

                        Are you serious? Or is your humor so ... original?
                        Officially, there are 56 nationalities in China. And during the census of 1964, 183 national minorities were registered, of which the government recognized only 54. Of the remaining 129 peoples, 74 were included in the recognized 54, ..
                        laughing
      3. Dead duck
        Dead duck 20 October 2017 15: 04 New
        +8
        Quote: pjastolov
        in a nuclear collision it is not known who will win

        Hello, honest company hi
        from what is not known - no one request
        1. pjastolov
          pjastolov 20 October 2017 15: 05 New
          +7
          Quote: Deadush
          from what is not known - no one

          by and large - yes in the modern form, and so the Papuans
        2. himRa
          himRa 20 October 2017 16: 20 New
          +2
          Quote: Deadush
          Hello, honest company

          Have a nice one you too! hi
          Quote: Deadush
          from what is not known - no one

          The argument is convincing laughing
          PMSM as they did not throw vigorous bonbs, the earth will survive, people are weak better .... people will survive, more horror stories but ... it's so lyrical, a retreat ... hi
          1. Dead duck
            Dead duck 20 October 2017 18: 34 New
            +7
            Quote: himRa
            people will survive

            Duc, yaspenpen .... tenacious people.
            The bulk will die out after (in the first six months to a year) ... from the lack of iPhones and TV shows laughing
        3. zoolu350
          zoolu350 20 October 2017 19: 47 New
          +1
          In a nuclear confrontation, Russia, thanks to the vast territory without the power of the Russian oligarchy in a nuclear war, could have turned any opponent, even NATO, at least the PRC, but since the Russian oligarchy is in power in the Russian Federation, we have no chance against the PLA, however, like in the SCM, because the PLA the strongest army in the world in terms of basic combat readiness indicators (1-strength, 2-mobilization reserve, 3-provision of modern equipment, 4-economic power to supply the army and make up for losses in equipment, 5-battle training, 6-moral and psychological state ary composition 7- SBCH number and delivery vehicles).
    2. Anarchist
      Anarchist 20 October 2017 14: 50 New
      19
      USA is a country of scoundrels and cowards! In a global conflict, they will not give up the use of nuclear weapons! On the contrary, apply it first !!!
      In this case, the United States wins due to the territory. Provided that the war is one on one.
      1. zoolu350
        zoolu350 20 October 2017 19: 49 New
        0
        SCHM will not use nuclear weapons if the enemy has it, because the owners of the Fed cannot afford a nuclear war, because this is the end of their PARADISE life and ABSOLUTE POWER over the world.
    3. NIKNN
      NIKNN 20 October 2017 14: 53 New
      +7
      Quote: himRa
      And you are doing it right! What bzd ... are afraid but you are mistaken!

      1. dzvero
        dzvero 20 October 2017 16: 18 New
        +1
        Hehe, for three with the Chinese did not see. Even funnier smile
      2. himRa
        himRa 20 October 2017 16: 29 New
        +3
        Quote: NIKNN
        Quote: himRa
        And you are doing it right! What bzd ... are afraid but you are mistaken!


        good our nature is harsh, and therefore had to strain to survive! drinks
      3. Greenwood
        Greenwood 20 October 2017 17: 10 New
        0
        Quote: NIKNN
        Umm, what about Schwartz? angry
        1. NIKNN
          NIKNN 20 October 2017 17: 20 New
          +2
          Quote: Greenwood
          Umm, what about Schwartz?

          He trained in Russia ...
        2. himRa
          himRa 20 October 2017 19: 35 New
          +1
          Quote: Greenwood
          Umm, what about Schwartz?

          It’s very simple ... like Vladimir Ilyich Lenin he had a log on a cleanup as it was known foam was! lol
        3. Victor-M
          Victor-M 20 October 2017 22: 26 New
          +1
          Quote: Greenwood
          Quote: NIKNN
          Umm, what about Schwartz? angry

          Schwartz is not considered, he is a terminator. wink laughing
        4. albert
          albert 20 October 2017 23: 40 New
          0
          The log that he drags, by the way, is cardboard.
  2. andre
    andre 20 October 2017 14: 47 New
    0
    Japanese media: the US will not stand in the war against China.
    Zhirinovsky: I will break my mouth.
    Poroshenko: Russia is an achressor country.
    In short, Agitprop \))
  3. Andrea
    Andrea 20 October 2017 14: 47 New
    +3
    Why, what? Is the USA at the beginning of the 20th century a superpower?
    1. dzvero
      dzvero 20 October 2017 16: 29 New
      0
      Economically, yes. The teeth erupted at the end of the XNUMXth century. As a result of the WWI, they went to the dams, overtaking the metropolis. True, military power left much to be desired, but by developing technology and production at home, they created the basis for a modern army. Around like China today.
      As a result of the WWII, the United States crushed all the western colonies. Britain is still called Great only by inertia. By analogy, for China, the question is among the countries where the current hegemon will replace it.
  4. rruvim
    rruvim 20 October 2017 14: 55 New
    +3
    And who knows how many China has nuclear warheads and carriers? It’s us who have been negotiating with the Americans for 30 years to reduce both of them, this was not the case with the Chinese. I won’t be surprised that his “ardent” arsenal is several times more than experts think. Moreover, in China there are sufficient deposits of Uranus. The question is whether the Chinese need a war with the United States. Their "creeping" population will already capture Indo-China and half of Africa ...
    1. Boa kaa
      Boa kaa 20 October 2017 22: 06 New
      +2
      Quote: rruvim
      And who knows how many nuclear warheads and carriers China has

      According to estimates of the Stockholm Institute of Strategic Studies, at the beginning of 2017 there were 240 nuclear weapons.
      Quote: rruvim
      this did not concern the Chinese. I won’t be surprised that he’s "vigorous" arsenal is several times more than experts think.

      At present, China’s nuclear potential is not as great as that of Russia and the United States. It consists of 60 land-mobile solid-fuel complexes DF-21 (an analogue of the Soviet RSD-10 Pioneer system) and 20-30 ICBMs DF-31 / 31A (an analogue of the Russian Topol RS-12 system). It is expected that after the successful testing of the DF-31B by 2015, the total strength of the Chinese mobile missile systems group will reach 130-140 units. In the near future, another DF-41 complex can replenish it - this modification of the missile will be able to fly at 14 thousand kilometers and carry a multiple warhead from 6-10 nuclear warheads. As a result, China’s nuclear arsenal will be approximately 200 – 240 warheads ... (https://tvzvezda.ru/news/forces/content/20150311
      0
      817-75hy.htm)
      1. rruvim
        rruvim 22 October 2017 20: 08 New
        0
        Data from Khramchikhin? The latest issue of the military-industrial complex?
  5. RUMA-A
    RUMA-A 20 October 2017 15: 15 New
    +1
    Hmm, China ... Forcibly put "Orion", the crew to hell and the airplane left themselves stuffed with the latest technology. And what about adversaries ??? And nothing .. The Chinese quietly and without unnecessary pathos dryuchut the strongest ...........
    1. Uryukc
      Uryukc 20 October 2017 15: 34 New
      0
      Something passed me, but you can link.
    2. Boa kaa
      Boa kaa 20 October 2017 22: 11 New
      +3
      Quote: RUMA-A
      Forcibly put "Orion", the crew to hell and the airplane left themselves stuffed with the latest technology.

      So they also attached the marine uninhabited apparatus ... dismantled, copied, then gave ...
      And the hegemon just wiped himself off ... and pretended to be "expressing serious concern."
  6. NEXUS
    NEXUS 20 October 2017 15: 36 New
    +3
    The economic potential of China is not in doubt.

    The United States has "smeared" its military forces with a thin layer around the world ... in fact, in the event of a conflict, mattresses will not be able to quickly concentrate large forces in one place. And China is increasing its military power, while it does not contain 700 bases around the world and does not participate in all military conflicts in the world.
  7. radiootdel4
    radiootdel4 20 October 2017 15: 44 New
    +3
    "The impressive military experience of the American army, which it was able to accumulate through participation in military conflicts in the Middle East," bombed three weddings, ten hospitals, six excavators and two funerals.
    I even got tired while bombing. Phew ...
    And now, the U.S. instructors along with the Romanians will prepare the special forces of Moldova and strike across China from two sides.
  8. Clueless
    Clueless 20 October 2017 16: 17 New
    0
    Now they forget to say that China hasn’t especially fought normally in the last century, and experience is very important
    1. zoolu350
      zoolu350 20 October 2017 19: 55 New
      0
      You are mistaken: the Korean War of 1950-1953, the Indo-Chinese conflict of 1959, Damansky Island and Lake Zhalanashkol in 1968, the Vietnam War of 1965-1973, the Sino-Vietnamese War of 1979.
  9. Settlement Oparyshev
    Settlement Oparyshev 20 October 2017 16: 52 New
    +1
    What do you write about what kind of war the USA has with the PRC? They are Nanai boys and have been kissing the gums for about 200 years. Every Chinese man worships America and strives to get there. For the sake of the view, the CCP is in conflict with the United States, but it is not Buddhism that decides the PRC. Are the Americans with a fool or something transferred production to the PRC? Transfer only to their own.
  10. Elevator
    Elevator in the building 20 October 2017 17: 11 New
    +1
    Of course, China is now a powerful power, but I do not think that in a protracted conflict, even without the use of nuclear weapons, they will stand, not the states. In my understanding, it is the territory that gives Amers an advantage, as we do. And the states will be able to transfer the economy to military tracks and put the country under arms. Not yet "pindosiy" is invincible in the battle once and for all, and at the same time not to death. But they can grab it not weakly, yes. However, there will be no war between them, this is economically one mega corporation. Rather, together they quietly strangle us.
  11. Dedall
    Dedall 20 October 2017 19: 15 New
    +3
    Judging by the constantly breaking Chinese phones and the disgusting quality of metal in drills, which we sell everywhere, the superiority of China is a strong exaggeration. But the saddest thing is that in Russia even drills are not produced, not to mention phones.
  12. Warrior-80
    Warrior-80 20 October 2017 20: 43 New
    0
    I think that without Russia, China has nothing to catch, America will pull them, at least another 10 years, and by the way why do they all talk about testing poplars, yars, minuten even the Koreans launch something, but something about the Chinese, if they are actively developing rocket especially in mbr, why can’t you hear anything about throwing test launches
  13. Moskovit
    Moskovit 21 October 2017 02: 11 New
    0
    China is not the same. On the one hand, the army pulled itself up, there is modern armament, on the other, a generation has grown up here that loves to eat well and sleep sweetly, and will not die with such dedication as in the Korean or Vietnamese war. And how much money is invested in assets in the West?
    It will methodically push the interests of China throughout Asia, not war. By the way, it’s funny that the Japanese placed a bunch of industries in China, they buy rice here and are immediately worried about the growth of the power of the Middle Kingdom))).
    1. zoolu350
      zoolu350 21 October 2017 04: 16 New
      0
      You're not right. The moral and psychological state of the personnel of the PLA is in second place after the DPRK army, because the competition for service in the PLA in the PRC is quite tough.
      1. Moskovit
        Moskovit 21 October 2017 07: 56 New
        +1
        You never know what ratings are invented by countries. I’m just now in China and I see how people live
        1. zoolu350
          zoolu350 21 October 2017 08: 11 New
          0
          They probably work, study and play sports.
          1. Moskovit
            Moskovit 21 October 2017 10: 25 New
            0
            And they work and study, but few are involved in sports. They smoke a lot. Everyone thinks only about money and entertainment. China has departed from communism even further than we are.
            1. zoolu350
              zoolu350 21 October 2017 12: 42 New
              0
              And why then does China take 1st place at the Olympics?
              1. Moskovit
                Moskovit 21 October 2017 19: 58 New
                0
                Firstly, they took first place at the 2008 Home Olympics. Then, especially in connection with the tightening of doping control, at the 2016 games they are already the third. Coincidence? )))
                Secondly, it is a sport of the highest achievements, it is an elite, and ordinary people are far from a sporting and healthy lifestyle. Now there is the 19th congress of the pda. He is actively promoted on TV. And right after the news there is an advertisement for different phones and underpants. This is all of China. Purely capitalist ...
  14. shinobi
    shinobi 21 October 2017 10: 01 New
    0
    Obviously a custom article. Samurai are sleeping and see how to get out of the ban on their own army. Legally. In fact, it is, but less than you want.
  15. Yak28
    Yak28 21 October 2017 14: 05 New
    0
    China has no chance against the United States. The number and quality of American missiles and planes are much better. Plus the most powerful fleet in the world. And what China has is not the most powerful nuclear weapons in small quantities on outdated carriers, plus huge human resources. Even without weapons of mass destruction, China has no chance of victory.
    But the main trouble of China is that they do not know how and never knew how to fight. China will sit and not twitch