Aviation of the Black Sea Fleet repelled the attack of "mosquito fleet"

Airplanes aviation Black Sea fleet Within the framework of the exercises, they liquidated a detachment of conditional enemy ships, said Vyacheslav Trukhachev, head of the information support department of the Black Sea Fleet.

In the course of the exercise, the crews of Su-24MR aircraft conducted reconnaissance and found a detachment of ships in the sea that imitated small rocket boats

- he said.

After the enemy was discovered, two Su-30CM multi-purpose fighters carried out actual bombing of the target ship. Defeat goals confirmed means of objective control, reports Kryminform.

TV channel "Star" published a video, which captured the output of the Su-30CM on the target, as well as the execution of anti-aircraft maneuver and destruction of the target by fighters.

Recall, on Monday, the leadership of the Ukrainian Navy reported that it had developed a tactic of attacking Russian ships: this is the “Wolf Pack” or “Mosquito Fleet” - when combat boats attack from several sides.

Now, as part of the exercises, the Russian Air Force demonstrated to the Ukrainian military the groundlessness of their opinion that it is more difficult to reach a small target, Vzglyad reports.

Comments

[_Ugene_]

What is the target immobile? The mosquito fleet involves many fast boats.

[210ox]

Oars to give? What would move? Do not forget that in the arsenal of our aircraft. And they move on the moving.

Quote: _Ugene_

What is the target immobile? The mosquito fleet involves many fast boats.

[_Ugene_]

So for that, and exercises to teach drugs to act in conditions as close as possible. And here it’s a very simple task, so statements like “Now, in the framework of the exercises, the Russian Air Force demonstrated to the Ukrainian military their groundless opinions” look far-fetched.

[Slovak]

Do not make me laugh. And pulled and pulled. I forgot how Georgian high-speed boats, after the first missile launch and direct hit in an advanced boat, rushed to their native harbor? They also flapped their wings and considered themselves brave warriors

[NEXUS]

Quote: 210ox

Do not forget that in the arsenal of our aircraft

I am interested in what exactly they “sipped” to sow the vessel and at what range ...

[_Jack_]

In my opinion, the video clearly shows that with ordinary bombs and from an extremely low altitude, this is a fighter, paragraph, why did they post this video so that they would all laugh at us?

[gromoboj]

what are you planning to shoot down a fighter going at low altitude?

[_Jack_]

banal MANPADS and hello SU-30, and for what? to get into a cheap trough (and not get into a mobile one with such bombing)?

[Mimoprohodil]

Any air defense systems. For example RIM-116: range of 10 km, minimum interception height: 4 meters

[Hagalaz]

As an assumption. If the computer controls the dropping of free-falling bombs, then movement can be considered. And the active maneuvering of boats does not contribute to the fulfillment of the main task.

[_Ugene_]

Well, if only "As an assumption." But real bombs are ordinary, free-falling. Hephaestus will help to calculate the discharge point for a stationary object from a great height. And here is a completely different task. The target should maneuver at high speed, resetting the video from extremely low altitude.

[Lord of the Sith]

Well done handsome!

[BAI]

What is the target immobile?

The keyword is "target." Who will give the real warship to destruction? Can the crew put him on it?

[Nikolai Grek]

Quote: BAI

What is the target immobile?

The keyword is "target." Who will give the real warship to destruction? Can the crew put him on it?

[_Ugene_]

And how do you think, for example, air defense is training? On real planes with a crew they beat? There are special moving targets for this. And here they want to demonstrate how they will destroy small-sized high-speed targets, and they themselves throw a bomb into a motionless trough. And what did they "demonstrate to the Ukrainian military"? That our Black Sea Fleet aviation does not have modern means of hitting ships? This is some kind of glum - to throw a bomb as during WWII and even from a fighter. Are they also going to attack the mosquito fleet? So it will be laughed at us and not at them.

[Slovak]

You know better from the couch ... Offer your services as the captain of a Ukrainian high-speed boat, because Russian suckers will not get anyway, and you will become a hero of ukroflot!

[_Ugene_]

And you, apparently, do not write from the couch, but from the general’s chair?
In general, your answer from the series when there is nothing to object to the essence of the question, but insulting, so you need to throw poop.

[ARES623]

Quote: BAI

Can the crew put him on it?

In-in, from the composition of the center of combat training of the Ukrainian Navy, t.s. to gain practical experience.

[Dim86a]

Recently, they announced the acquisition by the Ministry of Defense of air targets equipped with a remote control and an electronic warfare complex to maximize the approximation of live firing conditions.
Is a remote-controlled boat weak to do?

[Livonetc]

Naval battle off the coast of Georgia 10.08.08/XNUMX/XNUMX
The defeat of the amer-fed Georgian mosquitoes.

[Vlad5307]

Quote: _Ugene_

What is the target immobile? The mosquito fleet involves many fast boats.

So in this case, the size of the target is important, not its speed - not a single one, not even a super fast one, will leave the missile. Well, practicing the maneuver is avoiding the mosquito fire. Turn on at least a little logic of thinking and analyze the news from all sides, and not just from the outside.

[_Ugene_]

Hedgehog it’s clear that it’s easier to get into a motionless target, “turn on at least a little logic of thinking”.

in this case, the size of the target matters, not its speed

And it depends on what to attack, if a missile with an seeker, then yes, but here

two multifunctional Su-30SM fighters performed actual bombing

feel the difference? But bombing a moving target is much more difficult to successfully complete. The video also clearly shows that this is precisely the bombing.
You first "Turn on at least a little logic of thinking and analyze the news from all sides" and then advise others.

[Fitter65]

Quote: _Ugene_

feel the difference? But bombing a moving target is much more difficult to successfully complete. The video also clearly shows that this is precisely the bombing.

Why is it more complicated? The locator found that the target, data and characteristics of the target were entered into the computer (it is a computer, the on-board computer), when approaching with the target it passes the corresponding signals, press the button "write to the target." Free-fall type FAB-500m62, or CABs, or maybe planned? Again, the approach speed with the captured radar, illuminated by a laser beam, recorded by the KOLS target, is slightly different from the speeds with which the bombing took place during the times of IL-4 and Pe-2, but the speed of the target did not increase much. Yes and again the capabilities of these moving armored vehicles type "Gyurza-M" did not grow much compared to the same armored vehicles of the Great Patriotic War ... Su-24M with Hephaestus five-armed in moving targets lays down like a cook beats an egg in a frying pan ...

[_Ugene_]

target data and characteristics are entered into the digital computer (aka computer, on-board computer)

moreover, here is the on-board computer, this is bombing, and the SU-30 is a fighter, it does not have an SVP-24, there is nothing to work on the ground. Theoretically, it is possible to suspend a container with sighting equipment for working on the ground under an airplane, but in practice they are not. This is the usual bombing and thus getting into the fast-moving maneuverable target is very difficult, and it's stupid, here you need missiles with GOS.

[Fitter65]

Quote: _Ugene_

and the SU-30 fighter,

True, it’s not a very clean fighter, but a multi-functional one, and this is not a much different song. Multifunctionality implies a certain ability to strike at ground and moving targets ...

[Timx]

Aerial bombs (unlike missiles) do not have their own engine, and at the same time they are many times more mass (moment of inertia) with extremely limited aerodynamic control surfaces.

[Timx]

Therefore, the commanders who give orders to destroy high-speed small-sized targets with bombs have long gone to drive them from the Russian army (I say this having experience in the development and production of aviation weapons and familiar with the tactics of their use (both calculated and real - in the army))!

[mashinist]

I’ve agreed with you, but it’s worth considering that the news presented by VO blows on the Ukrainian statement about the mosquito fleet, and is the purpose of these bombings the Ukrainian fleet? It seems to me that one is not related, at least directly, to another

[_Ugene_]

Even so, using an expensive fighter-bomber as a ground attack aircraft without sighting equipment on the ground is, at least, stupid. He must attack this boat from high altitude with a GOS missile. But it can’t. What is this attack? At this altitude, the aircraft is substituted not just for MANPADS, but for conventional small arms, and it is not armored. For what? In order to get the maximum into the motionless trough, it most likely will not fall into the motionable. In short, complete nonsense. This is again to the question of the presence of precision weapons in the troops. Continue to hammer nails with microscopes.

[Fitter65]

The aircraft of the Black Sea Fleet naval aviation within the framework of the exercises eliminated a detachment of ships of the conditional enemy,

Well, what kind of people are you, huh! Boys with such joy and pride just dreamed how they were with their "mosquito fleet", with all SIX boats they will destroy the Black Sea Fleet of RUSSIA from cannons and machine guns in the "wolf pack", as they were immediately shown how to destroy all naval forces with two airplanes. It’s true that after watching the video of the flight of two Russian airplanes against the “wolf pack” there is an assumption that soon we will see what our “specialists” will do with these wolves omitted ( which are not related to wolves gray)

Award I degree (Vozhak) - for personal successful performance of combat missions in the enemy's rear and direct participation in the destroyed manpower and equipment of the enemy.
The award of the II degree (VURDALAK) - direct participation in the conduct of special actions and conducting special intelligence.
Third Degree Award (WOLF) - for high performance in the service, initiative and courage during the performance of service (combat) tasks, personal contribution to the success of special operations of the Armed Forces of Ukraine.

[Opanas abramych]

A poor flock of jackals ...

[Severomor]

And what's the point of "throwing pearls before pigs"? Silent teachings cannot be held

[Scum]

Quote: _Ugene_

What is the target immobile? The mosquito fleet involves many fast boats.

Is it easy to get from a fighter to a small boat? And for mobile purposes, other means are available.

[_Ugene_]

What am I talking about?

On Monday, the leadership of the Ukrainian Navy announced that it had developed a tactic for attacking Russian ships: the Wolf Pack or the Mosquito Fleet - when combat boats attack from several sides.
Now, as part of the exercises, the Russian Air Force has demonstrated to the Ukrainian military their groundless opinions

And we are shown how a fighter throws a bomb into a motionless trough. And what did they "demonstrate to the Ukrainian military"? That our Black Sea Fleet aviation does not have modern means of hitting ships? This is some kind of glum - to throw a bomb as during WWII and even from a fighter. Are they also going to attack the mosquito fleet? So it will be laughed at us and not at them.

[Ryabtsev Grigory Evgenievich]

Have you already sent this video to Tank Admiral? Will come down instead of the lip-grinding device.

[evil partisan]

A disc with the recording of these exercises should be sent to the ruins of the Moscow Region. May they enjoy.

[shans2]

in order to scare off the guns, the Su-25 attack aircraft are enough, they are ideal with their armaments with conventional NARs against small targets and the distance just below them in the area of ​​the mining towers near the Crimea.

[Manul]

I’ll bring my five cents last (I used to want to be marked by the third or fourth so that they would not think that I want glory. Now I don’t want anything at all, after the new rules)
A cast iron is good, but only with a given course, height and speed. Together with the created obstacles and obstacles of electronic warfare, air defense and other conditions, no one will calmly discard discs. First, false rockets are needed, then real rockets from different carriers, and then such finishing. They will not let you get closer, or at least go on such a comfortable course.

[IQ12NHJ21az]

I read the comments and was surprised by the heated discussion of the ordinary school day for pilots. I hope the commentators do not think that the MO started training bombing specifically as a response to the squeak of ukrosmi about the attack on our towers by ukrokateri. Pilots learn to destroy targets with free-falling bombs, as in Syria. And from small heights the same, that's all. Well, they could not resist and showed the video in response to arrogant statements. The watchman who guards the towers is quite enough to destroy the entire "mosquito fleet" of the outskirts.