Military Review

US ready to invade. Preposition: “Terrorist Act Similar to 9 / 11”

80
US ready to invade. Preposition: “Terrorist Act Similar to 9 / 11”



Today it became known that the Acting Secretary of Homeland Security, Elaine Duke, announced an attack against the United States, similar to the one that took place on 11 on September 2001 of the year (New attacks in the US 11 September, version 2.0).

"Terrorist organizations - Islamic State * or others - want to carry out an explosion similar to the one that they carried out on September 11. They want to shoot down an airplane, intelligence information clearly speaks about this," said the USMB minister at the US embassy in London. This is the most essential part of her performance. Carrying a few not too hidden meanings.

First of all, it should be remembered that the MVB (it was named in 2003) was created after the September 11 attacks. In October, 2001 was created by the Office of Internal Security plus the Homeland Security Council under the President of the United States. These include: the president, the state secretary, the vice president and the heads of more than a dozen different security agencies. In addition to the US security itself, the task of the WBM is to modify and complement the national security strategy, in accordance with the challenges and threats of the US The number of MVB employees is equal to the number of armed forces of the Kiev regime - about a quarter of a million people (!), And the organization's budget is equal to two annual budgets of Ukraine - more than 44 billion dollars!

This is the most powerful structure subordinate to the head of the White House. And Mrs. Duke directs her daily activities. And just like that, an official of such a rank does not make reports on upcoming terrorist attacks. Especially - public.

Information about upcoming terrorist attacks at the embassy could and should have been transmitted by traditional channels through ASM communications. The purpose of the Minister’s speech was precisely publicity. Bringing to the "information of the world community" that all current terrorist acts are a trifle, and most importantly - to fill up at least a plane - it is aimed and is already preparing precisely against the USA

It is not by chance that the head of the IMB also mentioned September 11. This is not only an analogy with the scale of the terrorist attack, but also a reference to meme. Sign event, which in the minds of the ordinary American (and European) justifies everything. September 11 is a carte blanche for anything. Total bombing, seizure of the state, sanctions without presenting evidence ... Yes, just a license to kill.

Suffice it to recall Afghanistan, the victim of a direct invasion of the US Army and NATO allies. A victim that is being destroyed to this day. Although there is not a single proof in the past 16 years that this state and the Taliban are at least somehow involved in the terrorist attacks.

And no evidence against Saudi Arabia, starting with the “Commission Report 9 / 11” and ending with criminal cases going on in the US today, in which the Saudis appear as financiers and organizers of the terrorist attacks, do not interfere with or hinder the occupation of Afghanistan while selling Riyadh weapons tens of billions of dollars.

Before us is the classic scenario justifying the invasion of any country. If you remember, the same Gaddafi and Libya began to destroy, recalling the long-standing terrorist attack and intensifying its accusations of suppressing the rights and freedoms of Libyans. As a result, today Libya does not exist not only as the most prosperous and rich state of Africa - it simply does not exist.

Who will be appointed extreme? - This is the main question after the statement of the Minister of Homeland Security.

From the list of the main possible targets of the United States - North Korea, Venezuela, Iran - none are suitable for a successful victorious offensive. North Koreans did not differ at all in terrorism, Venezuela is also extremely inconvenient for such accusations. The most convenient is Iran. Moreover, honestly, he sponsors no less terrorists than Qatar, Saudi Arabia, and others like them.

Another thing is that direct aggression against Iran does not seem to be either easy or necessary. Tehran can be used precisely as a state involved in the terrorist act and "threatening the surrounding countries", "terrorizing the population of the neighboring states", "creating the threat of a humanitarian catastrophe."

This is the perfect accusation. Perfectly suited to prevent the final defeat of the United States in the Middle East. Who is in charge today on behalf of the United States? That's right, the Kurds. Which are completely blocked by land and air by everyone, including the allies of the United States - Turkey and Iraq.

The terrorist act with the subsequent accusation of Iran of involvement in its organization (financing) solves a lot of problems for the United States. Under the pretext of fighting terrorist financing, unilateral and international sanctions are being imposed against Iran. You can forget about any sale of oil and gas pipelines to Europe. "To ensure the security of Iraq and the Kurdish population of the country, additional contingents of the" international coalition led by the United States are being introduced into Iraq. "

Deliveries of unlocked Kurds to weapons are automatically provided, their control over oil fields is restored, and the grouping of Kurds in Syria repeatedly increases, guaranteeing them to retain control over the occupied territories. At the same time, the purge is also carried out inside the Kurdish formations, from which the left, the opponents of capitalism and other ideological ones are driven out.

The first step towards the realization of such a scenario (in addition to the statement in London) was a noisy propaganda campaign aimed at defending the Kurdish population of Iraq, "subjected to genocide by pro-Iranian armed formations." The UN representative simultaneously with the statement of the head of the IMB reported on a humanitarian catastrophe in Kirkuk and the surrounding area, of which 48 people were running for 61200 hours.



As we see, so far everything is developing according to the traditional American training manual. Immaculately working more than once or twice, which allowed to destroy and / or capture not two and not three countries.

It seems that the only obstacle on this path for the United States today may be the forces that have formed in the Middle East to the situational coalition around Russia. In the end, no "america" ​​we have not opened. And the implementation of the US plans in the region directly hits the interests of all - Turkey, Syria, Russia, Iran and even Iraq.

Whether adequate measures of prevention and prevention will be found ... the battle will show.
Author:
Photos used:
tribune.com.pk
80 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. timgan777
    timgan777 20 October 2017 06: 35 New
    +9
    yes it was, is and will be ,,, the war is like a mother to them ,,,
    1. Grandfather
      Grandfather 20 October 2017 08: 31 New
      10
      It seems to me that Iran will fly in before it shows the vigorous club like Eun, the Yankees hurry ...
      1. Dashout
        Dashout 20 October 2017 10: 52 New
        10
        On provocation, striped highs ..
        For this purpose, they will not regret it ..
        1. Akuzenka
          Akuzenka 20 October 2017 11: 59 New
          +6
          It is unlikely that Iran, most likely Russia will be blamed. Why? Iran is too obvious to the majority and it is clear that its Iran does not care sanctions, accusations .. how many were against Iran. And the "blow" should be unpredictable and not obvious. And the reason is needed for escalation on the borders of Russia, the reason for the clash in Syria, etc.
        2. timgan777
          timgan777 20 October 2017 20: 51 New
          +2
          they do not have their own, there is only an exceptional nation wassat
          1. fedor toporov
            fedor toporov 22 October 2017 08: 03 New
            0
            The conclusion is: Without ,, Status '' - the quo of Russia can not do.
        3. atakan
          atakan 21 October 2017 02: 39 New
          +3
          We won’t take it anymore.
          If earlier I was happy about the "terrorist attack" in the USA, now it’s clear to everyone that it was a provocation and drank money.
        4. Michael HORNET
          Michael HORNET 21 October 2017 21: 19 New
          +5
          Go and bring down / blow up Board Number 1 with D. Trump on board))))
          At one stroke two birds with one stone)
          1. Dashout
            Dashout 22 October 2017 10: 08 New
            +3
            you can expect everything from them ...
      2. Karaul73
        Karaul73 20 October 2017 18: 02 New
        +8
        If it flies to Iran, then the Koreans will eat land from starvation, and their nuclear program will be advanced forward as soon as possible and in a short time. This is the only thing that can save them a country.
  2. aszzz888
    aszzz888 20 October 2017 07: 35 New
    +2
    Who will be appointed as the last? - This is the main question after the statement of the Minister of Internal Security

    ... completely "extreme" ... mericatos without war can no longer ... the loot must be washed in troubled water ... and it’s muddy when they are at war with someone ... angry
    1. RUStepan
      RUStepan 20 October 2017 09: 20 New
      +2
      Quote: aszzz888
      Who will be appointed as the last? - This is the main question after the statement of the Minister of Internal Security

      ... completely "extreme" ...

      Will Russia be extreme. Well, classic
      1. 79807420129
        79807420129 20 October 2017 10: 27 New
        +8
        Quote: RUStepan
        Will Russia be extreme. Well, classic

        They only unfasten a bakery to Russia, as well as to China.
  3. cedar
    cedar 20 October 2017 07: 44 New
    11
    "... And the implementation of US plans in the region directly affects the interests of everyone - Turkey, Syria, Russia, Iran and even Iraq ..."

    See the root. There is a United SHA, and there is a Zionist SHA. The second after September 11th finally took power over the first, but at the same time they are hiding behind them.
    One must always clarify, otherwise one does not understand who, where strikes for whose interests, and most importantly, in whose interests.
    1. japs
      japs 20 October 2017 15: 10 New
      +8
      The goal is Iran, Iraq, Syria. The defeat, redivision and creation of a separate state of Kurdistan. Which will bring upon itself all the troubles.
      The beneficiary of all this is “miserable Israel.” A side effect is a decrease, due to this entire military redistribution, of the state debt of Matrassia.
      Everything is logical, everything is in the interests of the world "shankar-money changer" Yankel. It’s clear who rules the ball ...
      To organize a terrorist attack under this business, like two fingers on ... asphalt.
  4. 1536
    1536 20 October 2017 08: 01 New
    +6
    If we compare the information that the Americans took the leaders of the terrorists from Syria with this information, we can only ask the US government in which city of America it is planned to hold the new "September 11 2.0"?
  5. bald
    bald 20 October 2017 08: 11 New
    17
    In general, the American people, first of all, should be afraid of their government and special services. They, to you, without any pity, in their favor, can only throw a terrorist.
  6. The leader of the Redskins
    The leader of the Redskins 20 October 2017 08: 20 New
    0
    Before us is a classic scenario for justifying an invasion of a country I agree with the author. The same thing could be observed before the Soviet troops entered Afghanistan, the Chinese into Tibet, and what a sin - three years ago in Crimea ...
    1. The comment was deleted.
      1. The leader of the Redskins
        The leader of the Redskins 20 October 2017 10: 43 New
        0
        You pay? Or does Nuland send me cookies? Or maybe a lot easier? True eyes prick?
        1. Setrac
          Setrac 20 October 2017 13: 40 New
          16
          You see, the non-respectable Tibetans are still ethnic to the Chinese, just as Crimeans are mostly ethnic Russians. At the same time, neither in Yugoslavia, nor in Libya, in Iraq, Syria, Afghanistan - there were no ethnic Americans from the very beginning.
          The USSR did not invade Afghanistan at all, but was there at the request of the government of that state.
          1. saigon
            saigon 20 October 2017 15: 52 New
            +2
            Well, in general, the population of Tibet is not in any way related to the Han Chinese.
            Quite different nations.
            1. Setrac
              Setrac 20 October 2017 20: 23 New
              0
              Quote: saigon
              Quite different nations.

              Different but close
    2. mcqway
      mcqway 20 October 2017 12: 44 New
      27
      Oh, these Russian invaders in Afghanistan, Vietnam, Korea and the Crimea! How to invade - so right away let's build factories, bridges and other schools. Yes, they throw money. That's the beast! Not that the bright striped elves))))
      1. The leader of the Redskins
        The leader of the Redskins 20 October 2017 13: 25 New
        +1
        About the elves, not a word ... About money - unfortunately at the moment their mattress rolls off more ... But most importantly, who asked someone to invade their territory? Hitler won a campaign against communism too ...
        1. Efrosinya Nosova
          Efrosinya Nosova 20 October 2017 13: 34 New
          +7
          You really, what the fuck do not distinguish from a finger, or just provoke?
          1. The leader of the Redskins
            The leader of the Redskins 20 October 2017 13: 40 New
            0
            But with the facts, please, if possible. Who called whom?
            1. andre
              andre 20 October 2017 15: 41 New
              +6
              Well, you are a respected lover of tanks and Indians, as if no one had called anywhere !!! So to say, move the figures, models or mice? Why are you playing war games there?
            2. bk316
              bk316 21 October 2017 15: 50 New
              +5
              But with the facts, please, if possible. Who called whom?

              But didn’t the governments of Syria and Afghanistan call us there?
              Or the governments of Vietnam and Korea did not ask for help?
              Che is silent, is it true that his eyes are shut?
              Or did Bandera roots appear? I saw such Kievites, even served in the SA, and then sharply remembered how their USSR spread rot and how their grandfathers rummaged through the forests. We looked at the cookies and immediately saw the light: immediately the COOKIES in the Russian Federation will not give such ....

              1. Sharansky
                Sharansky 22 October 2017 14: 27 New
                +1
                In Afghanistan they were called so much that President Amin had to be killed. Good people are solid
                1. andrew42
                  andrew42 24 October 2017 09: 29 New
                  +1
                  Amin began to go under the States, eliminating his former associates. It was on his conscience that the assassination of Taraki, which was regarded by the Soviet leadership (like any other de facto state), is absolutely clear and sober. And the answer, in the form of eliminating the “eliminator”, was 100% adequate. In fact, Amin was ready to carry out a reactionary coup in Afghanistan, with the consequences of creating an aggressive Islamic bloc Afghanistan-Pakistan on the leash of the United States on the southern borders of the USSR. The project "type ISIS" it was not developed 10 years ago in fact, but about 40 years ago. And the States are busy with it with varying success, not washing it like that, but they will not give up and will not give up until they themselves stamp greenery as much as they want.
        2. Lyuba1965_01
          Lyuba1965_01 20 October 2017 16: 02 New
          +7
          The USSR came to Afghanistan at the official request of Hafizullah Amin to provide military assistance to the country to combat anti-government forces. The USSR did not invade Vietnam, but helped its military advisers. At the same time, the Vietnamese army fought with the Americans, and not with the USSR army. About Korea .. Kim Il Sung formally asked Stalin for help in a full-scale invasion of South Korea. When the war between North and South Korea began, each side at first had only advisers, each had its own. And, unlike States, the USSR intervened in the war quite specifically: the USSR limited itself to air support, and the Soviet MiG-15s were not supposed to fly closer than 100 km to the front line. And do not forget that China also took part in this war, moreover, precisely with its army, five, unlike the USSR. The Korean war is still called in China "The war against America to support the Korean people." Now about Crimea. The whole world is already beginning to recognize that Crimea was neither captured nor occupied. Although everyone knew from the very beginning, it was not without reason that the sanctions imposed on a number of Russian senators are wording “publicly supported the deployment of Russian forces in Ukrain. ”And if, in your opinion, there was a military seizure of Crimea, then why are there so lenient sanctions for it?
          1. Nikolay Fedorov
            Nikolay Fedorov 20 October 2017 18: 37 New
            +2
            Quote: Lyuba1965_01
            The USSR came to Afghanistan at the official request of Hafizullah Amin to provide the country with military assistance to combat anti-government forces.

            Actually, we were already present in Afghanistan when Amin came to power. And then, when Amin began to drift menacingly toward the Americans, then we overthrew him to help normal pro-Soviet Afghans come to power.
            Quote: Lyuba1965_01
            The USSR did not invade Vietnam, but helped with its military advisers. At the same time, the Vietnamese army fought with the Americans, and not with the USSR army.
            We helped not only with military advisers, but also with weapons, ammunition, drugs, food, etc. When the first S-75 air defense systems began to arrive in Vietnam, our specialists were assigned to control panels. The first downed American planes were on our account. Then, as they prepared for the systems, they began to install the Vietnamese.
            Quote: Lyuba1965_01
            Regarding Korea ... Kim Il Sung formally asked Stalin for help in a full-scale invasion of South Korea. When the war between North and South Korea began, each side at first had only advisers, each had its own. unlike the States, the USSR intervened in the war quite specifically: the USSR limited itself to air support, and the Soviet MiG-15s were not supposed to fly closer to the front line closer than 100 km. And do not forget that China also took part in this war, moreover, precisely with its army, five, unlike the USSR ...

            Your information from the Soviet newspapers of that time? In fact, our pilots successfully participated in air battles with the Americans in the Korean sky. Our troops directly provided air defense to Korean cities, fortified areas, and railway junctions. Our ground forces did not participate in the battles. But the Chinese participated in the battles, but not with their PLA, but with volunteers. Over a million Chinese volunteers fought selflessly and successfully against American divisions.
            Quote: Lyuba1965_01
            Now about the Crimea. The whole world is already beginning to recognize that Crimea was neither captured nor occupied. Although everyone knew from the very beginning, it was not without reason that the sanctions imposed on a number of Russian senators are wording “publicly supported the deployment of Russian forces in Ukrain.” And , if, in your opinion, there was a military seizure of Crimea, then why are there so lenient sanctions for it?

            Who cares what the western world thinks about Crimea ?! Whether captured, occupied ... Let them think anything. We took back ours. The confused son returned to the family, well, well. Spit what the neighbors say. It’s completely worthless to think about what the neighbors (near, far and very far) will say or do about the return of our son to our family. And for the sanctions and other slander they will still apologize to the queue ...
        3. Cossack 471
          Cossack 471 20 October 2017 20: 27 New
          +2
          The leader of the redskins Of course, the mattresses throw more money. Popandopulo, too, did not regret it. Take it I'll draw myself
    3. Nikolay Fedorov
      Nikolay Fedorov 20 October 2017 16: 10 New
      +6
      Quote: Leader of the Redskins
      Before us is a classic scenario for justifying an invasion of a country I agree with the author. The same thing could be observed before the Soviet troops entered Afghanistan, the Chinese into Tibet, and what a sin - three years ago in Crimea ...

      If you hate the USSR and Russia and shove before the West, why use the red flag? Go under the flag that you respect.
      1. The leader of the Redskins
        The leader of the Redskins 20 October 2017 18: 00 New
        0
        I just don’t quote those nonsense that I have believed in for so long from school ...
        1. CT-55_11-9009
          CT-55_11-9009 21 October 2017 12: 07 New
          +3
          Yeah, you just quote other nonsense. From another regional committee.
    4. CT-55_11-9009
      CT-55_11-9009 21 October 2017 12: 04 New
      +2
      Quote: Leader of the Redskins
      The same thing could be observed before the Soviet troops entered Afghanistan, the Chinese into Tibet, and what a sin - three years ago in Crimea ...

      Hmmm ... And before us are examples of US opponents only. And what, in Iraq, the second time in Afghanistan, in Libya, too, Russia and China invaded? By the way, the passage about Crimea is never a topic.
  7. Enoch
    Enoch 20 October 2017 09: 14 New
    +4
    The Yankees are running a new scenario to force democracy.
    1. CT-55_11-9009
      CT-55_11-9009 21 October 2017 12: 07 New
      +1
      The old script. Already shabby.
  8. Antianglosax
    Antianglosax 20 October 2017 09: 36 New
    +6
    Hands and on the head should be beaten more often by the Yankers, then they will not be so impudent. And then they themselves first dismissed, and now we are surprised at their unprecedented rudeness and greyhound.
  9. Maratyurist
    Maratyurist 20 October 2017 10: 30 New
    12
    Americans always start wars with provocations against themselves and do not even hide it: the demolition of their battleship Maine, the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor, provoked by Amer’s fuel sanctions, the incident in the Gulf of Tonkin when a peaceful Amer destroyer was fired upon when it was hanging around in the territorial waters of a foreign country, towers in new york ... I understand that they can say about us, well, let them argue ...
    1. RUMA-A
      RUMA-A 20 October 2017 15: 01 New
      +2
      "Americans always start wars with provocations against themselves and do not even hide it: undermining their battleship Men." .. These will not rust. They concoct provocation at a time.
  10. pavelty
    pavelty 20 October 2017 11: 39 New
    +2
    Yes, everything is described quite plausibly, the author clearly laid out everything on the shelves ...
  11. Sergey Rudov
    Sergey Rudov 20 October 2017 14: 33 New
    +6
    Stubbornly do not want to admit that they themselves blew up these skyscrapers on September 11th.
  12. rruvim
    rruvim 20 October 2017 15: 23 New
    +1
    All this is fiction. Americans will not “seriously” attack anyone. Certainly not in Trump’s first term. Another thing is that in Syria they will squeeze out everything that is possible. And arrange wars with the wrong hands. To list (only in the Middle East): another Arab-Israeli conflict (Lebanon, Gaza), "disassembly" with Jordan, conflicts: Kurdish-Turkish, Kurdish-Syrian, Kurdish-Iranian, Kurdo-Iraqi, Pakistan-Indian. The continuation of the war in Yemen (the other day the Americans bombed the Hussites, although the Saud seems to have aviation like dirt), Egyptian-Ethiopian. There is nothing to talk about Africa at all. And everywhere there will be Amer advisers and special forces. For the Planet, the main thing is that they do not muddle the Indian-Chinese conflict. But they won’t stir up the unification of Koreas ... Then they will remember everything "poor Japan" ... Both Chinese and Koreans ...
    1. bk316
      bk316 21 October 2017 15: 58 New
      +2
      certainly not in Trump’s first term.

      And I think this will work, if it’s calm, then yes. And if it’s bad, then trump can go completely.
      1. Michael HORNET
        Michael HORNET 21 October 2017 21: 22 New
        +1
        So after all, the same downed plane may be Board number 1 with Trump))
        They are already so tired of him, but here is such a convenient excuse)
  13. Coconut
    Coconut 20 October 2017 15: 24 New
    0
    All their invasions are scarecrows ... unlike the east, Russia is ready for their ... hmm suicide .. well)
  14. iouris
    iouris 20 October 2017 15: 55 New
    +2
    In all such cases, the US Army had to invade its own territory in order to punish the organizers. In general, Trump promised to publicize who stood behind 9-1-1.
    1. Michael HORNET
      Michael HORNET 21 October 2017 21: 26 New
      +1
      He will be definitely killed then)) and he understands this if he opens his mouth on 9/11. Because it is silent, I managed to understand the essence. It’s another matter that, in any case, without the Sacrifice, the USA cannot, under an agreement with the Dark One, start a new business. (Since the 19th century, they ALWAYS made a sacrifice before the start of all wars, without exception) Therefore, indeed, a terrorist attack will be one hundred percent if they decide to intervene. By the way, they just called for 1000 pilots from the reserve - it’s so simple it’s unlikely .... And it seems they did a little workout with Stephen Paddock, so, to disperse
  15. Малый
    Малый 20 October 2017 16: 00 New
    +1
    Invade .... intruder they need to singe ....
  16. Molot1979
    Molot1979 20 October 2017 16: 26 New
    0
    DPRK can be deleted from the list. They will not contact the nuclear power.
    1. Glory1974
      Glory1974 20 October 2017 16: 55 New
      +1
      They will not contact the nuclear power.

      Correction: using nuclear weapons. If there are other options, then completely.
    2. iouris
      iouris 20 October 2017 22: 33 New
      0
      With three nuclear powers.
  17. andrew42
    andrew42 20 October 2017 17: 23 New
    +4
    Well, yes, Iran, Korea - this is stupid, even for a genetically degraded near-State Department cohort. Against Russia? - Well, here the “American retaliation” for the terrorist attack attributed to Russia can get a real Act, and the final one for civilization as a whole. And for deep. bullying and economic sanctions ogranization of a large-scale “9/11” type of self-fire is incomparable efforts. In the place of the State Department’s creators, I would blame the new terrorist attack ... Ukraine! Or rather the Bandera people who are now too zealously shaking Petunchik like a pear. Here Americans would be “all in white”: 1) open their eyes to “fascism” 2) defend Ukrainian democracy 3) satisfy the Poles / reassure the EU 4) deliver lethal weapons to Ukraine 5) send NATO troops to Ukraine. That would be fresh. You can buy Bandera’s corny, they will not be opposed. Well, a couple of odious figures are under the knife of “democratic justice”, and the rest, as translated by Goblin, “wash from shit, change clothes, and - into the squad.” For us, this option is very serious threat.
    1. bk316
      bk316 21 October 2017 16: 01 New
      +3
      This is too difficult for them, all specialists capable of such a long time in retirement or died. Now they are in fashion odnodomovki (generally do not think how they will be answered))
  18. CooL_SnipeR
    CooL_SnipeR 20 October 2017 17: 46 New
    +1
    We stock up on popcorn ... while reading the encryption on September 11, I did the same thing ... everyone knew perfectly well that there was no alkaida. Alkaida is generally a list of individuals, not an organization, who knows in the know
  19. Nikolay Fedorov
    Nikolay Fedorov 20 October 2017 18: 01 New
    +5
    The author fixed his gaze on the Middle East, and it seems to him that the Americans are fucking in Iran. Very unlikely in my opinion. Jews will not allow them to do this. They will not repay Iran instantly. Iran will certainly resist and snap back. And Iran will certainly snap back strikes against Israel. There is something to hit him with, so the Jews would have to be very ill.
    I think that a provocation with an airplane near the DPRK, like a Boeing 777 over Donbas, is much more likely. They already had training, mistakes were taken into account, goals will be achieved (unlike the Ukrainian version). Somewhere over South Korea near the border with the DPRK, a civilian airliner jammed with South Koreans will be shot down. And an hour later, after loud statements about how unbearably hard it is for Americans to look at deaths, they can use their entire military arsenal accumulated near the DPRK. And this is a lot.
    The argument that they will not dare that they are not crazy to attack a nuclear country, that they will not dare, is absolutely unsuitable. Whoever thinks they will not dare, let them look into history. 1962 year. USA, Washington, White House, meeting with the President with the participation of security forces. Almost all generals with foam at the mouth proved to Kennedy that it was necessary to immediately launch a nuclear strike against Cuba, and also to destroy all Soviet ships and submarines breaking through to Cuba. Only Kennedy's mind and caution did not allow the generals to start a nuclear war. Although one of our submarines, the Americans still bombarded with depth charges. One can imagine what was going on in the head of the submarine commander: there is no connection, the boat is being bombed, and he has nuclear missiles on board, maybe the war has already begun, is it time to crap around Washington? Thank God that the Americans bombed badly, no one was hurt, and the submarine commander did not give a command to launch missiles. So, summarizing the story, we can conclude that the Americans, unfortunately, are the same idiots who can commit the irreparable. They have already proven that they are capable of anything, and an attack on North Korea is a very likely event to be prepared. Otherwise, why would they have driven such an armada to the Korean and Japanese shores?
    1. Magorkiy
      Magorkiy 20 October 2017 19: 22 New
      +1
      There is certainly real logic. But I would not attack the NUCLEAR country bordering the two strongest armies in the world / RUSSIA and CHINA /. Really fraught with an answer. God forbid, the DPRK begins to throw even vigorous bombs, then, you understand that, South Korea and Japan simply will not.
      1. wax
        wax 20 October 2017 22: 25 New
        0
        Well, provocation is needed to deter China and Russia. China clearly stated that if they attack the DPRK, they will stand up for the DPRK, and if the DPRK dodges thoughtlessly, then China will not fight for its neighbor. It’s not easy with Russia either. Americans, therefore, will give Russia a chance to save face with a sluggish reaction to US aggression. Everything is thought out as if by notes. It is unclear whether China will voluntarily or unwittingly follow such a scenario: after all, intelligence can calculate the fulfillment of a provocation, or maybe not. As for the capabilities of the DPRK in an instant attack on nuclear facilities and command posts, they, I think, are greatly exaggerated.
    2. Michael HORNET
      Michael HORNET 21 October 2017 21: 28 New
      +1
      Iran is not at all as strong as it seems from the outside and its entire military and economic infrastructure is gathered in one place and is very vulnerable
      It may or may not win, but it’s easy to break it
  20. kriten
    kriten 20 October 2017 18: 48 New
    +5
    Russia needs to say aloud about the preparation of the United States for the outbreak of war. And that Russia will help Iran in the event of an attack. The question will be closed.
    1. Dashout
      Dashout 22 October 2017 10: 16 New
      +3
      Silent (unfortunately), as with the DPRK, when they voted for the sanctions ...
  21. RUMA-A
    RUMA-A 20 October 2017 18: 55 New
    0
    [quote = iouris] In all such cases, the US Army had to invade its own territory in order to punish the organizers. In general, Trump promised to make public who stood behind 9-1-1. [/
    From him like from Kennedy's shit ...
  22. Abel
    Abel 20 October 2017 19: 09 New
    +1
    Can supply S-400 to Iran? Or something else? To wash. Apparently the CIA has already picked up another skyscraper for demolition along with residents
  23. Magorkiy
    Magorkiy 20 October 2017 19: 11 New
    +4
    We need to attack and not react and respond to the moves of our “partners”. Vaughn with Georgia \ barely managed to answer, another day \ two would have heard out and that's it. But they knew in advance. With Ukraine, they also reached the Maidan, all with Yanukovych pissed. In Syria, again, at the very end appeared, no one expected such impudence from us after the Crimean operation. But the answer we are doing is effective, this cannot be taken away. I like the idea of ​​an invitation to Syria to control the Kurds, and indeed for military operations, one \ two \ three, etc. Special Forces Brigades from North Korea. We need independent military forces on earth there. That they / North Koreans / showed everyone their skill. Why is it thought that for NATO it will be over.
    1. CT-55_11-9009
      CT-55_11-9009 21 October 2017 12: 12 New
      0
      I did not know that the Philippines fought with Georgia, intervened in history with Ukraine, are at war in Syria, had an operation in the Crimea (this is generally super stealth !!!). Strong...
  24. polkovnik manuch
    polkovnik manuch 20 October 2017 20: 11 New
    +1
    The Nazis attacked their own radio station to declare war on Poland - all these tricks are as old as the world. The mattress covers of the Iranian bomb are afraid, so they are in a hurry! It is more difficult with the DPRK, a smaller country, but with nuclear missiles, there are two nuclear giants and South Korea, which will get in the first place, and Japan, which still remembers what nuclear is
  25. The comment was deleted.
  26. misti1973
    misti1973 20 October 2017 22: 39 New
    0
    No no! If you talk about it, it’s sure that nothing will happen :) The old truth: "Do not be afraid of what politicians scare you of. Be afraid of what they are silent about."
  27. Evgenii Xolod
    Evgenii Xolod 20 October 2017 22: 52 New
    +1
    What can they think of anything else except an airplane ????? Straight mania is somehow.
  28. Radikal
    Radikal 21 October 2017 00: 25 New
    0
    Whether adequate measures of prevention and prevention will be found ... the battle will show.
    And who is capable of getting involved (as I understand it with the USA) in this fight? request
  29. Radikal
    Radikal 21 October 2017 00: 34 New
    +3
    Quote: Leader of the Redskins
    I just don’t quote those nonsense that I have believed in for so long from school ...

    That is, all my life I’ve been a jerk, but then I saw the light - the third “eye” opened ... wassat
  30. karabuka
    karabuka 21 October 2017 06: 05 New
    +3
    Looks like they have ripened in the IMB - the international situation is changing in an unnecessary direction, anti-American motives are intensifying, especially after the visit of the emirate king to Russia. You need to flip the whip and cheer up a bunch of schemers from the EU! Only “you can’t beat a whip” - the newly revived center of mass with Russia and the Arabs, China and Iraq who are ready to cooperate with it, are doing their weather and it is slowly but changing. And in the wind, as is usually understood, writing is not accepted!
  31. vvv-73
    vvv-73 21 October 2017 15: 47 New
    0
    Now is not 2001, and the UN states will directly say that they themselves did this. There is no chance to push through the UN the resolutions they need. And with one-sided actions they will not easily win.
  32. Vanych
    Vanych 21 October 2017 19: 15 New
    +1
    again, the Americans want to get into somewhere, on the 11th they organized a terrorist attack to get into Iraq, and now where? .. to Syria?
    1. Michael HORNET
      Michael HORNET 21 October 2017 21: 29 New
      0
      Bomb Iran most likely, everything else is unlikely for them
  33. Meshchersky
    Meshchersky 21 October 2017 19: 17 New
    0
    Looks like it's time for me to go home.
  34. Domestic cat
    Domestic cat 22 October 2017 01: 52 New
    +2
    Quote: kriten
    Russia needs to say aloud about the preparation of the United States for the outbreak of war. And that Russia will help Iran in the event of an attack. The question will be closed.

    If Russia made a similar statement to the UN, wow! After perhaps the Yankees "brake" a little and maybe start to think with something.
  35. AFHENOGEN
    AFHENOGEN 22 October 2017 08: 46 New
    +1
    Quote: Home Cat
    Quote: kriten
    Russia needs to say aloud about the preparation of the United States for the outbreak of war. And that Russia will help Iran in the event of an attack. The question will be closed.

    If Russia made a similar statement to the UN, wow! After perhaps the Yankees "brake" a little and maybe start to think with something.

    Yes, mattresses sneezed at the UN, their thinker broke.
  36. A.
    A. 22 October 2017 12: 54 New
    +1
    Quote: timgan777
    they do not have their own, there is only an exceptional nation wassat

    Yes, what a nation is there, the Anglo-Zionists smelly. Like Brzezinski or etoy poisonous toad Kissinger.