Military Review

National Interest: The US has nothing to oppose the Russian C-400

98
Russian anti-missile systems C-400 "Triumph" change the rules of the game in the Middle East, writes The National Interest.


The reason is that this complex can launch interceptor missiles of various types, notes the author of the article, Stephen Brayen. We are talking about four types of missiles: 40Н6Е (range - 400 km), 48Н6 (250 km), 9М96Е2 (120 km) and 9М96Е (40 km). American Patriot systems, for example, can launch only one anti-aircraft missile at a distance of 96 kilometers, the author compares.

He calls the 9М96Е2 rocket one of the main advantages of the Russian systems. It develops speeds up to 15 M (about five thousand meters per second) and can shoot down targets flying very low above the surface of the Earth (about five meters).

National Interest: The US has nothing to oppose the Russian C-400


Brayen refers to Dr. Carlo Kopp, an aerospace research expert, who noted that C-400 can be equipped with detection and capture radars designed to destroy such modern stealth aircraft as the F-22 and F-35.

The development of stealth technologies is associated with low visibility for the frequency range X, which are most often used for both military and civilian purposes. Over time, the entire missile defense system of the United States and its allies, based primarily on the X-band, will become obsolete, because Russia and China are actively developing invisibility technologies for their missiles and aircraft.
- emphasizes Brayen.

In turn, the advantage of long-range missiles C-400 is their ability to hit targets located outside the air defense zone, including Boeing E-3 Sentry long-range radar detection aircraft.

According to Bayen, the decision of Saudi Arabia - the "loyal US satellite" - to acquire Russian systems was a serious blow to Washington and its European allies.

Before this, a deal for 2,5 billion dollars about the purchase of C-400 with Moscow was concluded by Turkey. Another country that may acquire Russian air defense system will be Egypt. At the same time, many countries, including Greece, China and India, already have C-300 systems, RIA News.
Photos used:
Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation
98 comments
Ad

Our projects are looking for authors in the news and analytical departments. Requirements for applicants: literacy, responsibility, efficiency, inexhaustible creative energy, experience in copywriting or journalism, the ability to quickly analyze text and check facts, write concisely and interestingly on political and economic topics. The work is paid. Contact: [email protected]

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Komsomol
    Komsomol 19 October 2017 18: 34 New
    +5
    Damn, you can, I'll be the first to spit !!! laughing laughing laughing Danka, she’s let go ... They can’t beg for money again from their frightened man in the street, they’ve been hit ... repeat
    1. Pirogov
      Pirogov 19 October 2017 18: 38 New
      +3
      Quote: Komsomol
      Damn, you can, I'll be the first to spit !!! laughing laughing laughing Danke, let go ... They can’t, they beg money again from their frightened man in the street, they are cunning.

      I would say they do not beg, but simply bred the average man. There, democracy, even if these same inhabitants are devouring.
    2. DEPARTMENT
      DEPARTMENT 19 October 2017 18: 45 New
      +6
      In the 41st we ran hares from the German attack aircraft ... What terrible losses were!
      And the S-400, this is an outdated system .. No wonder they sell it!
      In air defense, missile defense I think there will be something else inherently, I smell genes
      1. 32363
        32363 19 October 2017 18: 50 New
        +4
        Quote: DEPARTMENT

        And the S-400, this is an outdated system .. No wonder they sell it!
        In air defense, missile defense I think there will be something else inherently, I smell genes

        Today in the program "Time will show" there was an interesting recognition of the new super missiles of the Russian Armed Forces, ahead of usa by 50 years.
        1. tol100v
          tol100v 19 October 2017 19: 23 New
          +4
          Quote: 32363
          Today in the program "Time will show" there was an interesting recognition of the new super missiles of the Russian Armed Forces, ahead of usa by 50 years.

          Information in the media is what is supposed to be. But what is put in the troops, I unconditionally believe more! When the nth number (preferably in the required amount) of calibers, zircons, etc., etc., is put into service, then the soul is calm!
          1. zivXP
            zivXP 19 October 2017 19: 40 New
            +1
            The information war, all kinds of stuffing, can also bring benefits when used correctly.
          2. 32363
            32363 19 October 2017 19: 58 New
            +1
            Quote: Tol100v
            Quote: 32363
            Today in the program "Time will show" there was an interesting recognition of the new super missiles of the Russian Armed Forces, ahead of usa by 50 years.

            Information in the media is what is supposed to be. But what is put in the troops, I unconditionally believe more! When the nth number (preferably in the required amount) of calibers, zircons, etc., etc., is put into service, then the soul is calm!

            found the video, in the 31st minute, there’s something else belay , very informative
            https://www.1tv.ru/shows/vremya-pokazhet/vypuski/
            bolshaya-politika-mir-budushego-vremya-pokazhet-v
            ypusk-ot-19-10-2017
      2. dvina71
        dvina71 19 October 2017 19: 08 New
        +8
        Where did Departments run at 41? Can I have a detailed ..? Routes? In some places, the Red Army went on the offensive and went beyond the border of the USSR, in some places the border did not move at all until the 44th year. Are you in the department where you ran from the attack aircraft?
        And the Wehrmacht suffered terrible losses ... it was not in vain that the "Eastern Front" became a household word after a couple of months of fighting.
      3. Partyzan
        Partyzan 19 October 2017 19: 49 New
        +7
        Vital hi you are wrong yugoslavia
        1. smart ass
          smart ass 20 October 2017 02: 10 New
          +3
          A bad example with Yugoslavia, 1 stealth was shot down, but they lost the war, is there anything to be proud of?
      4. smart ass
        smart ass 20 October 2017 02: 13 New
        +2
        And here is the 41st? And which attack aircraft did you run from? U87 thing? Or hitler shirts?
      5. Alexey-74
        Alexey-74 20 October 2017 14: 07 New
        0
        S-500 "Prometheus" will be ....
      6. pilot306
        pilot306 21 October 2017 13: 11 New
        0
        The department, as always, is special in all areas. You can ask what kind of German attack aircraft we ran from. It is advisable to indicate the model and quantity eastward in the 41st year.
    3. Monos
      Monos 19 October 2017 18: 51 New
      +8
      Old Native American wisdom says: "For every cunning (stealth) * opu, there is a bolt with a screw."
      1. Solomon Kane
        Solomon Kane 19 October 2017 19: 06 New
        +9
        Hi victor In the context of the article, I liked the speech of our president in Sochi at a meeting of the Valdai Club .....
        Literally, I don’t remember, somehow: “You all saw what our Caliber can do, from air, water from under the water, etc. ... I want to say that Russia has high-precision air-based weapons with a range of more than 4500 km ... Our the answer, in which case, will be instant and mirror ... "
        1. sabakina
          sabakina 19 October 2017 19: 13 New
          10
          Kostya! I don’t understand what ... With reference to this system, I will quote from the movie:
          - Some say that God exists, others that do not. Both are unprovable.
          Until we see C-400, the people will be divided into "believers" and "atheists." I am personally a "believer."
          1. Solomon Kane
            Solomon Kane 19 October 2017 19: 40 New
            +6
            Glory, good evening!
            73 years without a war, does it mean something?
            So this is what "there" also believe, wait and believe ..... wink
          2. Monos
            Monos 19 October 2017 19: 44 New
            +8
            Glory, hello! hi
            Quote: sabakina
            Until we see C-400, the people will be divided into "believers" and "atheists." I am personally a "believer."

            It would be better not to see. smile
          3. Partyzan
            Partyzan 19 October 2017 19: 52 New
            +6
            Quote: sabakina
            Until we see C-400, the people will be divided into "believers" and "atheists." I am personally a "believer."

            Glory hi picture below laughing I am a believer too drinks
        2. tol100v
          tol100v 19 October 2017 19: 35 New
          +1
          Quote: Solomon Kane
          .Our answer, in which case, will be instant and mirror ... "

          Mirrored, probably suggests twice as much!
          1. Solomon Kane
            Solomon Kane 19 October 2017 19: 50 New
            +5
            I think it’s much more painful, I recalled a “furry joke:
            Challenged D "Artagnan Ilya of Murom to a duel ....
            D "Artagnan:" Athos, put a cross on the chest of this man with chalk and give, my sir, my sword .... "
            Ilyusha: "Dobrynya sprinkle this drischa with chalk and give me my mace" .....
        3. Monos
          Monos 19 October 2017 19: 36 New
          +5
          Greetings, Constantine! hi
          Quote: Solomon Kane
          .Our answer, in which case, will be instant and mirror ..

          Here, here it is - proof of Putin’s aggressive policies! A peace-loving country does not have the right to answer all sorts of things "if something happens ...". These "if something happens" who needs "if something happens." laughing
          1. Solomon Kane
            Solomon Kane 19 October 2017 19: 53 New
            +5
            No, Vit, stop already nipping from this world-striped hegemon ....
      2. Partyzan
        Partyzan 19 October 2017 19: 51 New
        10
        Quote: Monos
        Old Native American wisdom says

      3. Oberon_13
        Oberon_13 20 October 2017 16: 29 New
        0
        On the bolt with the left screw, there is * opa with millstones))) .... and so on
    4. 210ox
      210ox 19 October 2017 19: 16 New
      +4
      There is nothing worse than the praise of the enemy and the alleged admission of bankruptcy. All this from the evil one.
      Quote: Komsomol
      Damn, you can, I'll be the first to spit !!! laughing laughing laughing Danka, she’s let go ... They can’t beg for money again from their frightened man in the street, they’ve been hit ... repeat
    5. Maz
      Maz 19 October 2017 20: 59 New
      +1
      Ah, what a grief, well, they don’t buy the Hezi, slings, arrows, lightnings, thunders, bales of iron, etc. They are peace-loving Jews, they will sell, help, protect, they will not hit in the back, they will not be torn to pieces. Buy from Israel and you will have a reliable defense against Muslims, Arabs, Egyptians, and other non-Jews. And quality !, and advancement! What about the price! No product is better! Where is the world heading? Russians, they are so Russian!
    6. Okolotochny
      Okolotochny 19 October 2017 23: 01 New
      +7
      Do you, Cossack, are you naval or air defense? I look at all hands ..... master. Tie a plump. Db.
  2. bogart047
    bogart047 19 October 2017 18: 37 New
    +2
    China, Turkey, CA ... we live in interesting times ...
    1. Alex777
      Alex777 19 October 2017 20: 07 New
      +4
      Here is just that:
      One of the main advantages of Russian systems, he calls the 9M96E2 rocket. She has a speed of up to 15 M (about five thousand meters per second)

      complete nonsense, unfortunately. Not a single missile of the S-400, and even more so 9M96E2, flies with such speed. If it flies at least 1500 m / s - it will be just a holiday. And so they write everywhere: average speed = 1000 m / s. hi
      1. SSN
        SSN 19 October 2017 20: 16 New
        0
        The same was greatly surprised by the figure at 15M.
        1. Vadim237
          Vadim237 19 October 2017 23: 38 New
          +1
          At this speed, only 53T6 missile defense missiles in Moscow fly.
  3. starogil
    starogil 19 October 2017 18: 40 New
    +7
    Zadolbali praising the S-400, maybe all the same, at least in Syria the S-400 would show WHAT THEY ARE
    are able?
    1. Kurare
      Kurare 19 October 2017 19: 03 New
      10
      Quote: starogil
      Zadolbali praising the S-400, maybe all the same, at least in Syria, the S-400 would show what they are capable of?

      The most effective weapon is one whose presence simply discourages contact with it. So, the S-400 in a peculiar way showed what they are capable of. In addition, we don’t know all the details of how often they took “sworn friends” to accompany them and thus completed their task.
      1. Shahno
        Shahno 19 October 2017 19: 20 New
        +4
        Let's be objective with -300,400 have problems. In mountainous areas they lack reaction time. How many times f-16 showed it.
        1. Kurare
          Kurare 19 October 2017 19: 28 New
          11
          Quote: Shahno
          Let's be objective with -300,400 have problems. In mountainous areas they lack reaction time.

          Smiled! And you show me the air defense system, which has no problems in the highlands? Not for fun, EVERYONE is trying to fly low and around the terrain.
          Quote: Shahno
          How many times f-16 showed it.

          And, how many times did the F-16 show this in the area of ​​responsibility of the S-400, i.e. where the F-16 could pose a threat to the Russian group of forces?
          1. Shahno
            Shahno 19 October 2017 19: 50 New
            +4
            But wait. Who said that with 400 an advanced complex and covers the entire territory of Syria.
            1. Kurare
              Kurare 19 October 2017 19: 53 New
              +9
              Quote: Shahno
              Who said that with 400 an advanced complex and covers the entire territory of Syria.

              That's who said let it justify. Looking at the map of Syria, and so it becomes clear that those S-400 installations that Russia sent to Syria are not able to block its entire territory. But this task was not posed for her!
            2. Solomon Kane
              Solomon Kane 19 October 2017 19: 57 New
              +7
              Create the perfect, do not buy from the Amers Patriots - create your own ....
              Taki in the wrong hands always horseradish (plant) is thicker .....
              1. Shahno
                Shahno 19 October 2017 20: 13 New
                +2
                Yes Kane. Do not just create doubt. The loaf will be the foundation.
            3. Yeah
              Yeah 19 October 2017 20: 03 New
              +2
              but wait, who received the guarantees that the s-300 and s-400 are intended ONLY to cover the Khmeimim base? among the first crap ...
          2. Shahno
            Shahno 19 October 2017 19: 53 New
            +1
            Masyaf ... suburbs of Damascus not once. The only thing that can justify you is a real agreement with our commander in chief.
            1. Kurare
              Kurare 19 October 2017 19: 57 New
              +7
              And what, in the suburbs of Damascus are S-400? Or the suburbs of Damascus in the area of ​​responsibility of Russian air defense?

              As already mentioned, the S-400 is there for other purposes, and not to close the sky over the entire Syrian territory.
              1. Shahno
                Shahno 19 October 2017 20: 08 New
                +1
                This is all clear. But while in these conditions, aviation performs tasks, but not air defense. And all this is nothing. What is the point of seeing if you cannot act.
                1. Kurare
                  Kurare 19 October 2017 20: 17 New
                  +7
                  And again I repeat, the S-400 is fulfilling its task, not a single incident was in the area of ​​responsibility.
                  1. Sharansky
                    Sharansky 19 October 2017 21: 09 New
                    +2
                    and the area of ​​responsibility is where they didn’t receive the Lyuli
                    1. japs
                      japs 19 October 2017 21: 54 New
                      +5
                      Does your nickname remind me of something related to some kind of betrayal or exchange? I'm not wrong?
                      1. Sharansky
                        Sharansky 19 October 2017 22: 57 New
                        +2
                        Forgetfulness is one of the earliest symptoms of Alzheimer's. I'm not wrong?
                    2. Kurare
                      Kurare 19 October 2017 21: 57 New
                      +6
                      The great designer of rocket and firearms, Arkady Georgievich Shipunov, once said: "Air defense is where aliens do not fly."

                      Since no one got the Lyuli, it means that they completed their air defense missions.
                      1. Sharansky
                        Sharansky 19 October 2017 22: 51 New
                        +1
                        Only strangers fly like at home. Strange, huh?
                2. Muvka
                  Muvka 19 October 2017 20: 17 New
                  +4
                  In what place does the air defense not perform? Our base has never been bombed by aviation. And those missiles that are with MLRS and cylinders - perfectly shoots down the Shell. Show at least one photo with damage to something on the basis of Hmeimim.
                  1. Sharansky
                    Sharansky 19 October 2017 21: 10 New
                    +1
                    and from Shairat there, by chance, not the Russian military escaped a couple of hours before being hit with axes?
                    1. YUG64
                      YUG64 19 October 2017 21: 58 New
                      +5
                      Quote: Sharansky
                      and from Shairat there, by chance, not the Russian military escaped a couple of hours before being hit with axes?

                      Do you consciously put the policies and air defense capabilities in one heap? Do you pour the tea into the borscht too? I've already met this “argument” about five hundred times at different “analytes”. ..I just can’t believe how many bright minds we have ... One of the other is brighter!))
                      1. Sharansky
                        Sharansky 19 October 2017 23: 00 New
                        +2
                        Quote: YUG64
                        You deliberately put the air defense policy and capabilities in one pile?

                        And where does the politics. If the issue was in politics, then no one would be embarrassed by saying that the Earth suddenly turned round. The question was in what place the air defense does not fulfill its tasks. I named at least one place.
                    2. The comment was deleted.
              2. voyaka uh
                voyaka uh 19 October 2017 23: 13 New
                +5
                S-400 covers the Russian air base Khmeinim. S-300 covers the Russian naval base in Tartus. They have narrow tasks that they perform.
        2. Alexey-74
          Alexey-74 20 October 2017 14: 11 New
          0
          It’s interesting that they themselves came up with the problems ... if the S-300, S-400 (all the more) didn’t shoot down the F-16, then there was a reason, not a technical problem ............ but about mountainous terrain, so for the rest of the American and European air defense systems, I generally keep quiet .... well, will the Israeli air defense / missile defense be probably the most effective in the world right?
      2. starogil
        starogil 20 October 2017 06: 30 New
        0
        You still say that: - the nobility of power in its non-use. Took to fight - fight,
        and do not plague behind the back of an ally.
    2. dvina71
      dvina71 19 October 2017 19: 11 New
      +5
      Well, probably the Turks didn’t just want the S-400 ..., they sat under it .. they wanted it. After all, the main thing is not to bring down .. for now, it is enough to hold it on the sight .., they say that Turkish F-16s already had an alarm on the air defense system on the takeoff. Maybe they breshet ... what for then is he him?
      1. tol100v
        tol100v 19 October 2017 19: 42 New
        +1
        Quote: dvina71
        Maybe they breshet ... what for then is he him?

        For "self-satisfaction", we copied, we do not take off!
        1. Solomon Kane
          Solomon Kane 19 October 2017 20: 01 New
          10
          Igor, Duc, among the Jews the most authoritative opinion is their own ...... laughing
    3. NKT
      NKT 19 October 2017 19: 20 New
      +6
      Do you think the buyers of S-300 and S-400 in the catalogs only look at them and feel them only in the window? When the Indians bought, so with them 14 missiles were fired for different purposes, and on the 12th the Indians themselves said enough. All targets were hit.
      1. MadCat
        MadCat 20 October 2017 07: 30 New
        +1
        Quote: NKT
        The Indians when they bought, so with them 14 rockets fired

        But where is such information, a link from?
        1. NKT
          NKT 20 October 2017 23: 32 New
          0
          The Star showed the transmission. Try on YouTube to search
  4. Herculesic
    Herculesic 19 October 2017 18: 51 New
    +2
    But what about the much-praised SM6? belay Or, most importantly, portray yourself as such a poor sheep, which the terrible Russians will kill without a knife tomorrow? ?? sad
  5. Livonetc
    Livonetc 19 October 2017 18: 56 New
    +4
    Quote: starogil
    Zadolbali praising the S-400, maybe all the same, at least in Syria the S-400 would show WHAT THEY ARE
    are able?

    I’ll quote a phrase from a comedy.
    "Wail.
    Just like a groan!
    The whole world is in ruin!
    .....
    But then."
    Can't wait to kill and die?
  6. Egorovich
    Egorovich 19 October 2017 19: 05 New
    +7
    Good product, good advertising - these are money buyers and are lining up. And at the approach is a very good product - S-500. Everything is correct and logical.
  7. NEXUS
    NEXUS 19 October 2017 19: 07 New
    +5
    Based on the analogy of the S-350 Vityaz, which should replace the 300th, there are vague suspicions that in five years the S-450 may appear. I think that they are already working on such a complex, otherwise the Triumphs would not have been sold to everyone, including NATO members and allies of this bloc.
    1. NKT
      NKT 19 October 2017 19: 24 New
      +1
      But 350 unless to replace 300, this is not an addition - a kind of doublet like ml-20 and a-19 at one time?
      1. NEXUS
        NEXUS 19 October 2017 20: 29 New
        +3
        Quote: NKT
        And 350 unless to replace 300

        Vityaz S-350 is a new generation medium-range Russian anti-aircraft missile system undergoing state tests. It is planned that Vityaz will replace the S-300PS and Buk-M1-2. At the end of 2016, the Almaz-Antey concern announced that it had begun development of a new medium-range air defense system, which “will replace the Buk and S-350 Vityaz air defense systems.”
        1. jonht
          jonht 20 October 2017 08: 26 New
          +2
          According to Buk, the zhurnalyugi made a mistake, this is a complex of military air defense and S-350 it will not replace, since it is a complex of object air defense. It is possible that on a common base with the S-350 make and military complex ....
      2. Kasym
        Kasym 19 October 2017 20: 51 New
        +3
        The S-300 is no longer being produced, and the S-350 is being replaced. Now it is a medium-range air defense system, but with a large ammunition. Development starts from a joint Russian-Korean air defense system. hi
    2. tol100v
      tol100v 19 October 2017 19: 49 New
      +2
      Quote: NEXUS
      there are vague suspicions

      He also noted that if there is open talk about the S-500, then on the approach could be -600 and -700, and N! (Factorial)! Science does not stand still, and technology runs forward!
  8. shans2
    shans2 19 October 2017 19: 11 New
    +1
    Our Middle East, everyone else on the way out, Iran steers !! 11))
  9. 1536
    1536 19 October 2017 19: 18 New
    +1
    So is it time for a negotiating table? Or do Americans hope for Gorbachev-2.0? It seems so.
  10. Old26
    Old26 19 October 2017 19: 20 New
    +3
    An author from NI begins to compare systems built on different ideologies. . We are trying to deploy several missiles at once on our systems. Our opponent is one, less often two. Here is just an interesting detail. Everyone is talking about missiles such as 40N6E and 9M96E2 / 9M96E. Questions about backfill.
    1. Whether the 40N6 missile has been adopted, that this author writes so confidently about it. as far as I remember, in the spring, Shoigu spoke of her as completing the test, but not standing in service
    2. Someone other than at the exhibitions saw the S-400 system with containers from 9M96 series missiles? I'm afraid not. In none of the stories that regularly flash on TV screens did I observe launchers with such containers
    3. And then, what makes the S-400 fundamentally different from the S-300, if these types of missiles are not found in the troops? Maybe nothing, and the S-400 system is just the same S-300 with a slightly increased range and possibly other radars?

    Quote: Pirogov
    I would say they do not beg, but simply bred the average man. There, democracy, even if these same inhabitants are devouring.

    You're right. Another horror story for the western man in the street. “Give me the money, otherwise the Russians have it, but we don’t.” The lag in the bombers had already passed, when billions were knocked out by the US lawmakers to deploy a fleet of strategic bombers, motivating that the USSR had a lot of them (here we outwitted ourselves), we can recall the missile lag, when the lag was motivated by showing missiles on Krasnaya areas of which some did not go into series at all, and some were mock-ups
    1. Tusv
      Tusv 19 October 2017 19: 57 New
      0
      Quote: Old26
      But what then essentially differs the S-400 from the S-300, if these types of missiles are not found in the troops? Maybe nothing, and the S-400 system is just the same S-300 with a slightly increased range and possibly other radars?

      So the S-400 is the S-300PM3. What is the difference? Highly integrated. Well, for example, you can integrate which rubella. In S-300 it is possible to drown itself IMHO
    2. Kasym
      Kasym 19 October 2017 20: 46 New
      +3
      In the spring, they stated that the long-range missile on the S-400 was adopted (without indicating which numbering), the rocket on the S-350 and Polyment - Redoubt would be ready in the fall (i.e. it is currently being tested). hi
    3. voyaka uh
      voyaka uh 19 October 2017 23: 17 New
      +1
      "And then what fundamentally differs the S-400 from the S-300," ///

      The S-400 radar is more modern.
  11. Dzafdet
    Dzafdet 19 October 2017 19: 28 New
    +1
    Quote: starogil
    Zadolbali praising the S-400, maybe all the same, at least in Syria the S-400 would show WHAT THEY ARE
    are able?

    Already. F-35 knocked down ... Aircraft to the scrap. Total: - 142 million dollars from the treasury of the defense of Israel .. laughing tongue wassat
    1. Kurare
      Kurare 19 October 2017 19: 56 New
      +2
      Quote: Dzafdet
      Already. F-35 knocked down ... Aircraft to the scrap. Total: - 142 million dollars from the treasury of the defense of Israel ..

      This is where such infa ??? belay
      1. dvina71
        dvina71 19 October 2017 20: 37 New
        0
        The Israelis themselves say. That the bird .. As a result of the collision, the plane cannot be restored .. I'm interested .. what kind of bird flies there? It won’t work out like a seagull or a goose ... At least a cow with wings ...
        1. Kurare
          Kurare 19 October 2017 20: 56 New
          +2
          Quote: dvina71
          As a result of the collision, the aircraft cannot be restored ..

          The plane landed, did not crash. Why on earth cannot it be restored? Or did you break everything you could when landing? Where does this infa come from?
          1. voyaka uh
            voyaka uh 19 October 2017 23: 19 New
            +2
            Damage was noticed only during routine visual inspection after landing.
        2. aiden
          aiden 20 October 2017 03: 37 New
          +1
          It was a cormorant, which in St. Petersburg damaged the roof of the stadium. They have a powerful beak. And f-35 plating rakryaghrenil his beak. They are cormorants
  12. Dzafdet
    Dzafdet 19 October 2017 19: 31 New
    +1
    Quote: Shahno
    Let's be objective with -300,400 have problems. In mountainous areas they lack reaction time. How many times f-16 showed it.

    And it will show more than once until they give the Start command! wassat
  13. huntsman650
    huntsman650 19 October 2017 19: 56 New
    0
    Clogged with interference and prs along with cr massoo.
  14. Vasyan1971
    Vasyan1971 19 October 2017 20: 00 New
    +1
    Well. And local Jews, sorry, the Israelis chant in chorus that the S-400 bullshit, because nothing has been shot down yet. And whom to believe? Israxpertam or Braien and Kopp? Perhaps I will believe our anti-aircraft gunners. These tough guys themselves do not fly and do not give others.
    1. Tusv
      Tusv 19 October 2017 20: 12 New
      0
      Quote: Vasyan1971
      Perhaps I will believe our anti-aircraft gunners. These tough guys themselves do not fly and do not give others.

      What are we harsh? Paramilitary. And we give flying and even protect "from noise, from din, from all sorts of evil," but only ours.
    2. voyaka uh
      voyaka uh 19 October 2017 23: 22 New
      +1
      Why bullshit? 4th-generation aircraft, she knocks down well.
  15. SSN
    SSN 19 October 2017 20: 01 New
    +1
    What?
    What are the 15Ms of the 9M96E2?
    1. lesabotage
      lesabotage 19 October 2017 20: 54 New
      +1
      Quote: SSN
      What?
      What are the 15Ms of the 9M96E2?

      That's right, there is 24M. To immediately pierce through 5 abrams.
    2. japs
      japs 19 October 2017 22: 09 New
      +4
      SNN ...
      Please read all comments, it says ...
  16. The comment was deleted.
  17. YUG64
    YUG64 19 October 2017 23: 18 New
    0
    Sharansky,
    That is, the military set their own tasks, and decide for themselves with whom they should fight and with whom to wait ... I understand!
  18. aszzz888
    aszzz888 20 October 2017 01: 59 New
    0
    National Interest: The US has nothing to oppose the Russian C-400

    ... so sit there, behind your puddle, and don’t rock the boat, but you’ll rake it ... angry law of physics... bully
  19. tolmachiev51
    tolmachiev51 20 October 2017 04: 41 New
    0
    Aircraft carriers send to China for "nails".
  20. ROM1077
    ROM1077 20 October 2017 09: 06 New
    +2
    The ss400 can be suppressed as easily as any other air defense. even a volley and 20 -30 tomahawks will not leave her no chance. and there are more technological methods
  21. iouris
    iouris 20 October 2017 11: 47 New
    0
    I don’t understand, are they worried that they cannot shoot down the S-400?
  22. rocket757
    rocket757 20 October 2017 13: 48 New
    +3
    The obvious bred ... the poor they are preoccupied.
    It should be clear to everyone that no money pity for security.