Military Review

Klintsevich spoke about the new “invisible” rocket for the Iskander

65
The Russian Defense Ministry has completed testing of a new missile for the Iskander-M complex, leads Parliamentary newspaper Statement by the Deputy Chairman of the Federation Council Committee on Defense and Security Franz Klintsevich.




According to the senator, "the tactical and technical characteristics of this development do not violate the treaty on medium and shorter missiles, its range does not exceed 500 kilometers."

However, the rocket is interesting because it is almost invisible. In addition, the rocket is very accurate
said Klintsevich.

He added that during the last test, the rocket traveled 480 kilometers.

Earlier, the head of the state central interspecific Kapustin Yar test site, Major General Oleg Kislov, announced the completion of tests of the new missile for the Iskander-M missile system.

Of the most significant events held recently, we can note the completion of interdepartmental tests of the new missile for the Iskander missile system,
said Kislov.
Photos used:
http://www.globallookpress.com
65 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Herculesic
    Herculesic 19 October 2017 16: 10 New
    +7
    It is as if they are now writing that the rocket flew exactly 700 kilometers in tests! fool
    1. Alex777
      Alex777 19 October 2017 16: 20 New
      13
      This will not write. Because there were no such tests. But deep in the soul of designers, the confidence that will fly is there. bully
      1. alex-s
        alex-s 19 October 2017 16: 22 New
        16
        He added that during the last test, the rocket traveled 480 kilometers.

        I would write: 499 kilometers. Let the "partners" pukany tear!
        1. Kasym
          Kasym 19 October 2017 16: 29 New
          +2
          It’s so hard to intercept. Flight time at such a distance is minutes. Let them even try to intercept along a ballistic trajectory.
          1. voyaka uh
            voyaka uh 19 October 2017 22: 47 New
            +1
            It's right. Very little reaction time. Almost immediately, seconds after the launch of Iskander, it is necessary to launch a missile defense, and already in flight to send to the calculated point of the meeting. Otherwise, no time.
          2. Orionvit
            Orionvit 19 October 2017 23: 28 New
            +1
            Quote: Kasym
            Flight time at such a distance minutes

            Minutes for modern air defense, where the response rate is measured at a maximum of ten seconds, is almost an eternity. True, I do not know what the speed of the warhead in the final section of the flight is and whether modern Western anti-aircraft missiles are capable of shooting it down.
        2. okko077
          okko077 19 October 2017 16: 33 New
          0
          They will not tear anything, they have containers supposedly loaded with missile defense systems, at once, loaded with tomahawks .... And they are so white and fluffy to democratic blue ....
        3. Alex777
          Alex777 19 October 2017 16: 44 New
          +2
          Do not write anything. What and how far it flew is immediately measured from space. Easy. hi
          Therefore, the true range is known deep in the soul. wink
          1. dubovitskiy.1947
            dubovitskiy.1947 19 October 2017 17: 12 New
            +4
            Quote: Alex777
            Do not write anything. What and how far it flew is immediately measured from space. Easy. hi
            Therefore, the true range is known deep in the soul. wink

            To test, for example, the flight of a rocket with one propulsion block, and separately another block with slightly different characteristics. And make sure that docking with one another is possible.
            It would be nice to experience it realistically, without conventions, but there is no need to rush it. Wait for pindocs to exit first.
        4. evil partisan
          evil partisan 19 October 2017 16: 48 New
          +7
          Quote: alex-s
          I would write: 499 kilometers. Let the "partners" pukany tear!

          Aha yes . 499 and 9 in the period smile . Anything less than 500 ... repeat
          1. grandson of Perun
            grandson of Perun 19 October 2017 18: 34 New
            +7
            Or maybe she was still around the 480th kilometer for about 10 minutes? wink repeat
          2. Tersky
            Tersky 19 October 2017 19: 58 New
            +4
            Quote: wicked partisan
            Yeah. 499 and 9 in the period
            winked Is it easier to write, 499, (9), not fate? no Hi hello drinks !
            1. evil partisan
              evil partisan 19 October 2017 20: 12 New
              +4
              Quote: Tersky
              Is it easier to write, 499, (9), not fate?

              Clever, huh? sad
              Hello thunderstorm wild boar and pike lover! drinks
              1. Tersky
                Tersky 19 October 2017 20: 42 New
                +4
                Quote: wicked partisan
                Clever, huh?

                Ernicha, smart not accustomed to laughing How is the weather in the north? Does fishing give?
                1. Inok10
                  Inok10 19 October 2017 21: 23 New
                  +3
                  ... hmm, I looked here at the Iskander pedigree ... good heredity ... mother of the Oka ... http://militaryrussia.ru/blog/topic-183.html

                  P.S. from the same source ...
                  Complex "Oka-U" - radar seeker on warhead and aerodynamic rudders on warhead for guidance on the final section of the trajectory. It is possible to use as part of reconnaissance and strike systems with obtaining target designation from a remote information source with adjustment and re-targeting warheads in the middle part of the trajectory (from an reconnaissance aircraft or AWACS).
                  ... 25 years ago ... wink
      2. demo
        demo 19 October 2017 17: 22 New
        +1
        Those. if the designer’s depth of soul is sufficient, it will fly by.
        And if not?
      3. sir_obs
        sir_obs 19 October 2017 17: 30 New
        +7
        It is written that the rocket is invisible, so no one saw how much it flew there
      4. opus
        opus 19 October 2017 17: 53 New
        +4
        Quote: Alex777
        Because there were no such tests. But deep in the soul of designers, the certainty that it will fly by is

        It is not.
        Till...
        until they implement a 2-stage scheme and (or) a detachable BB (with remote control for a single-stage)
        wrong mass (starting)
      5. edge
        edge 20 October 2017 05: 50 New
        0
        Quote: Alex777
        This will not write. Because there were no such tests. But deep in the soul of designers, the confidence that will fly is there.

        just given our tendency to build modular structures, nothing prevents us from predicting the appearance of a moving block that will significantly increase the approach range
      6. Alexey-74
        Alexey-74 20 October 2017 14: 16 New
        0
        I think in it (the rocket) are embedded and other characteristics ..... only this is a military secret .....
    2. DEPARTMENT
      DEPARTMENT 19 October 2017 18: 38 New
      +1
      However, the rocket is interesting because it is almost invisible. In addition, the rocket is very accurate

      And still men, as we say in Russia, "there is no smoke without fire ..!" ..
      Putin is very confident in foreign policy (he knows how to bluff, of course ..), but he knows that our Kulibins work and there are still many surprises in their “trump cards” ..
      Not everyone sold out to the west, from ours in the 90s!
      Developments are leaps and bounds and not all of us know .. And so it is, we can keep Russian secrets ..!
  2. Deniska
    Deniska 19 October 2017 16: 11 New
    +2
    and maybe more than 500 km)))) but it's secret laughing
    1. Solomon Kane
      Solomon Kane 19 October 2017 16: 14 New
      10
      Koli Klintsevich said that there is a rocket, then there is a rocket .... wink winked lol
      But seriously:
      “Now Iskander-M OTRK can be equipped with five types of aeroballistic missiles and one cruise wing”
      This was announced to TASS by the General Designer of the Scientific and Production Corporation Engineering Design Bureau of Engineering (part of the holding High Precision Complexes of the Rostec State Corporation) Valery Kashin
    2. NIKNN
      NIKNN 19 October 2017 16: 55 New
      +2
      Quote: Deniska
      and maybe more than 500 km)))) but it's secret laughing

      Oh, and if there’s more there is a little, a little and then the wind was fair ... wink
  3. Stas Snezhin
    Stas Snezhin 19 October 2017 16: 32 New
    +6
    "The tactical and technical characteristics of this development do not violate the agreement on intermediate and shorter-range missiles, and its flight range does not exceed 500 kilometers."

    Well, then so:
  4. etrofimov
    etrofimov 19 October 2017 16: 32 New
    0
    Interestingly, will Iskander have a version for the Navy’s BRAV?
  5. Romario_Argo
    Romario_Argo 19 October 2017 16: 32 New
    +4
    Of the most significant events held recently, we can note the completion of interdepartmental tests of the new missile for the Iskander missile system,

    OTRK Iskander-M is equipped with an 9M723 missile but (!) With different warheads
    These are finished factory products, bch no one rearranges
    Therefore, they say that they tested a new missile, but in fact 9М723 only with a different warhead
    1. edge
      edge 20 October 2017 05: 53 New
      0
      Quote: Romario_Argo
      OTRK Iskander-M is equipped with an 9M723 missile but (!) With different warheads

      yes but everyone starts from the same installation
  6. evil partisan
    evil partisan 19 October 2017 16: 46 New
    +1
    Baranets recently wrote that for the Iskander they’re finishing off a missile with a range of about 2000 km. I don’t quite understand: how to shove a rocket with a range of 4 times that of the standard one in the available dimensions of the launcher, but nevertheless he wrote about it.
    Here, I found:
    https://news-front.info/2017/10/18/viktor-baranet
    s-na-zapade-schitayut-iskandery-samym-opasnym-oru
    zhiem-rf-i-ne-zrya /
    1. Zaurbek
      Zaurbek 19 October 2017 16: 54 New
      +1
      There were claims to Iskander that he had a missile diameter large for 500 km range and there was a reserve along the length of the missile ...
      1. hrych
        hrych 19 October 2017 16: 58 New
        +9
        We have no complaints laughing
        1. Zaurbek
          Zaurbek 19 October 2017 17: 02 New
          +1
          Claims were from the Americans. They wanted to bring a contract ...
          1. NKT
            NKT 19 October 2017 19: 14 New
            0
            What contract? Iskander of the mid-90s. Under the contract, we ourselves brought the predecessor - Oka.
            1. Zaurbek
              Zaurbek 19 October 2017 21: 56 New
              0
              Iskander- almost doubled OKA rocket shorter and there are two
    2. Romario_Argo
      Romario_Argo 20 October 2017 08: 10 New
      0
      Baranets recently wrote that for Iskander they’re finishing off a rocket with a range of about 2000 km

      2000 km., This is the nominal range for the 9М723 missile, and the declared 500 km.
  7. jovanni
    jovanni 19 October 2017 16: 54 New
    0
    How is it "virtually invisible"? Does she have no engine? Wonders...
    1. hrych
      hrych 19 October 2017 17: 01 New
      +3
      Quote: Jovanni
      Does she have no engine?

      He TTRD, work out, accelerate the rocket to the desired acceleration and all. A quasi-ballistic trajectory also reduces the ability to capture it. As you can see, the lack of massive stabilizers also reduces the EPR, well, and the tricky coating ...
      1. jovanni
        jovanni 19 October 2017 17: 12 New
        +1
        Ah, got it. Thank.
  8. Bronevick
    Bronevick 19 October 2017 16: 59 New
    0
    What is even newer than the R-500?
    1. Solomon Kane
      Solomon Kane 19 October 2017 18: 56 New
      +4
      She is. Read below ....
      1. Bronevick
        Bronevick 19 October 2017 19: 28 New
        0
        where is below that? there is no mention in the article
        1. Solomon Kane
          Solomon Kane 19 October 2017 19: 29 New
          +4
          Comments, dear, comments .....
          1. Bronevick
            Bronevick 19 October 2017 19: 30 New
            0
            Oh yeah mommy experts
            1. Solomon Kane
              Solomon Kane 19 October 2017 19: 35 New
              +5
              Well, if the general designer of the Scientific and Production Corporation Engineering Design Bureau of Engineering (part of the holding company High-Precision Complexes of the Rostec state corporation) Valery Kashin is an expert, then .... let me leave ... hi
  9. voyaka uh
    voyaka uh 19 October 2017 17: 06 New
    0
    Is she winged or ballistic?
    1. Herculesic
      Herculesic 19 October 2017 17: 21 New
      +9
      Which in the column "delivery" indicate, that will arrive! lol
    2. Solomon Kane
      Solomon Kane 19 October 2017 18: 51 New
      +5
      Aeroballistic ...
      9M723 aeroballistic missiles (possess various types of military equipment, as well as various homing correlation heads) are controlled throughout the flight, which makes their trajectory unpredictable and makes it difficult to intercept tactical missile defense systems. The complex can also use high-precision 9M728 cruise missiles (R-500).
      The missile is single-stage, has an engine with one nozzle, is non-ballistic and is controlled along the entire flight path with the help of aerodynamic and gas-dynamic rudders. Most of the flight path of a rocket manufactured using the Stealth technology and having a small scattering surface passes at an altitude of 50 km, which significantly reduces the likelihood of its destruction by the enemy. The effect of "invisibility" is achieved due to a combination of design features, in particular, processing the rocket with special coatings, dropping protruding parts after launch, etc.
      The design of the rocket is single-stage with an inseparable warhead. Much attention is paid to reducing the EPR - there are no protruding parts, holes or visible joints, cable gargrot is minimized as much as possible on the first rocket variants and is made in the form of a thin loop on the surface of the rocket body on more modern series, aerodynamic steering wheels are replaced by arrow-shaped ones instead of lattice ones. A special heat-protective coating of the housing is used, which, probably, can play the role of a coating that reduces EPR.
      The trajectory of Iskander is not only non-ballistic, but also difficult to predict. Immediately after the launch and immediately upon approaching the target, the rocket performs intensive maneuvering. Depending on the trajectory, overloads range from 20 to 30 units. Accordingly, the interceptor missile must withstand an overload of at least 2-3 times higher, which creates additional difficulties for the developers of anti-Iskander systems.

      1. voyaka uh
        voyaka uh 19 October 2017 21: 09 New
        0
        "Immediately after launch and immediately upon approaching the target, the rocket performs intensive maneuvering" ////
        -----
        Thanks for the link.
        And on the entire middle section — almost the entire route — it flies along a ballistic trajectory.
        Which is miscalculated, and where can interception take place from the opposite direction.
        This is a difficult goal because of the very short reaction time, but nothing is impossible.
  10. Loginoff
    Loginoff 19 October 2017 17: 06 New
    +1
    Quote: Jovanni
    How is it "virtually invisible"? Does she have no engine? Wonders...

    This is when if you still saw the rocket, but you won’t tell anyone wink
  11. Thunderbolt
    Thunderbolt 19 October 2017 17: 15 New
    +2
    There are no invisible missiles. It is clear that no one knows the real capabilities of Iskander missiles and therefore no one is forbidden to train in their knowledge.
  12. Timur Nigamov
    Timur Nigamov 19 October 2017 17: 35 New
    +1
    Programmatically limiting the range of the rocket is not difficult, it seems to me. And if that, and in which case, pulled out a check, turned off the plug and flew darling, where necessary, and as much as necessary.
  13. Old26
    Old26 19 October 2017 17: 38 New
    +4
    Quote: wicked partisan
    Baranets recently wrote that for the Iskander they’re finishing off a missile with a range of about 2000 km. I don’t quite understand: how to shove a rocket with a range of 4 times that of the standard one in the available dimensions of the launcher, but nevertheless he wrote about it.
    Here, I found:
    https://news-front.info/2017/10/18/viktor-baranet
    s-na-zapade-schitayut-iskandery-samym-opasnym-oru

    zhiem-rf-i-ne-zrya /

    Well what can we say to the writings of Baranets- "This, unfortunately, is not cured." I would like to ask the great connoisseur of Barents how, with the same mass and dimensions and the same or close fuel with the same payload, you can get a range of 4 times more. I think that from the pantheon of scientists of the 20th century it is necessary to immediately throw Konstantin Eduardovich Tsiolkovsky with his stupid formula into impossibility and place Viktor Barents. What else can be said about him. Except for Lavrov’s words - nothing suits, namely DB BLD !!!!!

    Quote: Romario_Argo
    Of the most significant events held recently, we can note the completion of interdepartmental tests of the new missile for the Iskander missile system,

    OTRK Iskander-M is equipped with a 9M723 missile but (!) With different warheads. These are finished factory products, bch no one rearranges. Therefore, they say that they tested a new missile, and in fact 9M723 only with a different warhead

    Absolutely right
    1. dubovitskiy.1947
      dubovitskiy.1947 20 October 2017 02: 00 New
      0
      Quote: Old26
      Quote: wicked partisan
      Baranets recently wrote that for the Iskander they’re finishing off a missile with a range of about 2000 km. I don’t quite understand: how to shove a rocket with a range of 4 times that of the standard one in the available dimensions of the launcher, but nevertheless he wrote about it.
      Here, I found:
      https://news-front.info/2017/10/18/viktor-baranet
      s-na-zapade-schitayut-iskandery-samym-opasnym-oru

      zhiem-rf-i-ne-zrya /

      Well what can we say to the writings of Baranets- "This, unfortunately, is not cured." I would like to ask the great connoisseur of Barents how, with the same mass and dimensions and the same or close fuel with the same payload, you can get a range of 4 times more. I think that from the pantheon of scientists of the 20th century it is necessary to immediately throw Konstantin Eduardovich Tsiolkovsky with his stupid formula into impossibility and place Viktor Barents. What else can be said about him. Except for Lavrov’s words - nothing suits, namely DB BLD !!!!!

      Quote: Romario_Argo
      Of the most significant events held recently, we can note the completion of interdepartmental tests of the new missile for the Iskander missile system,

      OTRK Iskander-M is equipped with a 9M723 missile but (!) With different warheads. These are finished factory products, bch no one rearranges. Therefore, they say that they tested a new missile, and in fact 9M723 only with a different warhead

      Absolutely right

      Your dolbo ..... is not appropriate. You were not allowed to enter the design bureau for testing, and you do not know, in fact, the radius of the Iskander. Initially, and how it was pushed into the type of missiles, not subject to reduction.
      Therefore, it is better to be silent, because then you will seem smart.
  14. milling machine
    milling machine 19 October 2017 17: 45 New
    0
    I’m in a state of confusion, ours on "every corner" say that the gyu "stele is a bluff and drank" and then all of a sudden ... Or are our stealth different?
  15. Proton
    Proton 19 October 2017 18: 12 New
    0
    laughing Well, if they are invisible, then you need to put them closer to Europe, for example, more in Kaliningrad.
  16. zulusuluz
    zulusuluz 19 October 2017 18: 52 New
    +1
    Is there a ship option? ..
    1. Herculesic
      Herculesic 19 October 2017 19: 18 New
      0
      No, only there is an option as MANPADS - it starts from the shoulder! wassat
  17. fzr1000
    fzr1000 19 October 2017 20: 04 New
    0
    This is the first channel of the year 2013
    Why is such a range depicted?
    1. SSeT
      SSeT 19 October 2017 20: 50 New
      0
      Because there is also a cruise missile in the R-500 complex, it’s just for 2000 and can fly. but she is NOT BALLISTIC, classic KR
      1. voyaka uh
        voyaka uh 19 October 2017 22: 39 New
        0
        Is it a "Basalt" launched from an Iskander machine?
  18. 3vs
    3vs 19 October 2017 20: 51 New
    0
    Pshekam note ...
    Yes, even with vigorous stuffing to convince ...
  19. Radikal
    Radikal 19 October 2017 23: 02 New
    +1
    Quote: DEPARTMENT
    However, the rocket is interesting because it is almost invisible. In addition, the rocket is very accurate

    And still men, as we say in Russia, "there is no smoke without fire ..!" ..
    Putin is very confident in foreign policy (he knows how to bluff, of course ..), but he knows that our Kulibins work and there are still many surprises in their “trump cards” ..
    Not everyone sold out to the west, from ours in the 90s!
    Developments are leaps and bounds and not all of us know .. And so it is, we can keep Russian secrets ..!

    Uhhhhhh ...! wassat
  20. vetlan19
    vetlan19 20 October 2017 02: 24 New
    0
    Quote: DEPARTMENT
    (he knows how to bluff of course ..)


    Shaw vi say bluff!
    Did you find an idiot !?
    In everything, absolutely in everything (!) The most accurate calculation, steps and actions verified to the smallest detail!
    You have to say this - bluff!
    He is not a card player and the country is not a grated deck.
    And what Putin is doing really affects the global state.
    So how can one compare a world leader with a card player?
    Not at all ...
  21. Old26
    Old26 20 October 2017 09: 30 New
    +2
    Quote: dubovitskiy.1947
    Your dolbo ..... is not appropriate. You were not allowed to enter the design bureau for testing, and you do not know, in fact, the radius of the Iskander. Initially, and how it was pushed into the type of missiles not subject to reduction

    Are you convinced?
  22. rocket757
    rocket757 20 October 2017 13: 53 New
    +3
    Quote: voyaka uh
    It's right. Very little reaction time. Almost immediately, seconds after the launch of Iskander, it is necessary to launch a missile defense, and already in flight to send to the calculated point of the meeting. Otherwise, no time.

    I would like to know? What is the calculated meeting point with a maneuvering missile ... for a ballistic trajectory. as if I remember .... if the rocket maneuvers !!! only active guidance / homing.
    Something like that it was ...