Military Review

Russian global project: how to subordinate the world to your will

70



What should Russia be: a national state for Russians or the home of many nations? Today this question is vigorously debated in Russian society. Strangely enough, but exactly the same controversy arose during the first Romanovs, in front of whom there was, in fact, the same question.

This article is a development issue raised in the previous article.

The split of Russian society in the XVII century

Having recovered from the time of troubles and partially regaining its strength, Russia in the middle of the seventeenth century faced a dilemma. What to do next? Either close off from the outside world in ourselves and take for the principle “why do we need“ nemchura ”, if we have our traditions and“ faith of ancestors ”, or transform the internal life of the country so that it becomes convenient for all the peoples living in it , and those whose accession was planned in the foreseeable future.

It was at this time that the sovereigns of the house of the Romanovs conceived a plan for building an Orthodox empire instead of the fallen Byzantine empire. The idea of ​​Moscow as the Third Rome, around which all Orthodox peoples should gather, became state-forming, and all the reforms of the internal life and the foreign policy of the country were subordinated to it. In order to facilitate the accession of new lands, it was decided to completely rebuild the foundations of the state.

Russian global project: how to subordinate the world to your will


The reforms began and mainly conducted by Tsar Alexei Mikhailovich. His son, Peter Alekseevich, the future first Russian emperor Peter I, had only to finish what he had begun and finish off the inner fronde of the "zealots of antiquity".



The capture of Constantinople and the unification of all Orthodox lands became the main ultimate goal of all Russian politics of the XVII-XIX centuries. And I must admit, Russia was very close to the realization of this dream. In fact, the path that the kings-reformers led the country was the road that allowed Russia not only to gain a foothold on the shores of the Baltic and the Black Sea, but also to occupy the territory of Catholic Poland, Lithuania and the Protestant Baltic. The Transcaucasus and the peoples of Central Asia were included in the empire.

Russia's withdrawal from the "troubled time”

Today, in the second decade of the XXI century, Russia was able to partially recover from the time between the 1990's troubled times. The country is gradually adjusting the economy and building new powerful armed forces. But it faces the same question as the Russian tsars of the 17th century: what to do next? Without an answer to it, one can neither build an ideological basis of a new state, nor outline a plan for its development for the coming decades.

So: either close within internal borders and build a national state and forget about fallen outskirts, or reform your ideology and inner world to a new imperial or, in modern terminology, a global Russian project. As we understand, in the first and second cases, a completely different foundation must be laid under the new state.

If the path of development of Russia in the form of a national state is chosen, then it will have to concentrate its efforts on creating conditions so that the slogan “Russia for Russians” is not just a slogan, but become a national idea. The outcome is not difficult to predict. Our opponents will be happy to help Russia build this new state matrix, and at the same time prepare him a lot of worthy rivals. The same nationalists.

As the West can play the national card, we could be convinced twice during the twentieth century. The countries of the former USSR have been pumping the last such experiment in blood over the course of 25 years, and there is no end in sight. At least in the paradigm of nationalism.

The second way of the country's development to supporters of building “Russia for Russians” seems to be a betrayal. Just as three and a half centuries ago, their ideological ancestors thought that the reforms would kill the people and their soul.

And we hear again the talk of "devotees of the Russians", of an unreal king and bad boyars and "Germans" who knock the king off the right path.

The second path is the path that will allow the destruction of most of the barriers between Russia and its surrounding nations. This is the road on which each of these nations will find what will make it go further along with the peoples of Russia-Eurasia.

Chechnya, considered in the previous material as a model, was one of the first stones laid in the foundation of the future state. Yes, at the same time mistakes were made, and there will be many more. But the main thing still happened: the people of Russia could understand that only moving forward together would lead them to success and victory, all the peoples of the country together.

New tests and a new level of reforming the consciousness of Russian society are in line. It was the turn to realize that the people of Russia, Ukraine, Belarus, the Caucasus, Central Asia have much more in common than differences. They have common interests, goals and objectives, and without each other they will be very difficult to achieve, if at all possible. And then there will definitely be a new stage in the understanding of the common interests of the peoples of Eurasia, and there will not be far from the common interests of the peoples of the world.



Global peace is inevitable. The development of technology and means of communication does not leave humanity a different path of development. So let it be better if we lay down its foundation, having invested our mentality and soul, and become the basis of a new global project, than “national Russia” will become the object of encroachments of its more reasonable neighbors.
Author:
70 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Eurodav
    Eurodav 19 October 2017 15: 45 New
    +7
    “That people serves the best of world civilization, which brings its national to the highest limits of development”
    I really don’t remember who said ...
    1. Vladimir16
      Vladimir16 19 October 2017 17: 55 New
      16
      Global peace is inevitable. The development of technologies and means of communication does not leave humanity a different development path.

      The nonsense repeated recently in every media. The author probably loves Italian pizza, or Japanese sushi, Georgian cuisine and other NATIONAL cuisines. The proposal to grind everything in the millstone of multiculture failed both in mattress and in Europe. The author apparently slept for a long time or young. Is the milk on your lips dry?
      how "national Russia" will become an object of assault her more reasonable neighbors.

      The neighbors are, of course, reasonable, but there are no Russians .... It’s time for the author to dump the reasonable neighbors over a hill, otherwise he will fly by chance from an unreasonable Russian stairwell. For us, barbarians unreasonable, we need to answer periodically.
      1. horhe48
        horhe48 20 October 2017 09: 40 New
        0
        It’s absolutely useless to subjugate the world of your will to Russia. This is utopia. We already pushed one utopia-communism and it didn’t bring us anything good. Another thing is the territory of the former USSR, and maybe even the Russian empire. It is quite possible to replace confrontation with mutually beneficial cooperation But not by the old methods, when both in the Empire and in the USSR, the national suburbs lived freer and richer than central Russia. It seems that the national elites who are united in the Eurasian Economic Community or think to join there again want to milk Russia to the fullest. (Byalorus, Armenians, Kazakh-Kyrgyz, etc.) For some reason, it seems to their elites that the Russians owe everything to them and owe everything to them. And their standard of living should be immediately at the level of the Russian and even much higher. (Otherwise, they say why the garden ? And if it is added in one place, then it will decrease in another. Such parasitic tendencies must be stopped in the bud. Here it is necessary to immediately and on the shore agree to introduce the principle of each according to ability, each according to work.
      2. Antianglosax
        Antianglosax 20 October 2017 10: 14 New
        +1
        Quote: Vladimir16
        Delirium

        If only because the author does not know our history or deliberately opportunistically presents it and, accordingly, draws erroneous conclusions.
      3. Andyixixx
        Andyixixx 21 October 2017 00: 34 New
        0
        Really the same. As the means of communication develop, they will become more and more perfect and in the future they will reflect the real picture of the world. Balkanization of the Internet. It’s hard to imagine so far. In the near future, Russia will have its own information space, separated from information from the outside for natural and artificial reasons. And most importantly, it will not seem inferior without the same information from the outside.
    2. Raindragon
      Raindragon 19 October 2017 18: 01 New
      +2
      It is believed that nationalists are the best servants of the world master)
      1. Vladimir16
        Vladimir16 19 October 2017 18: 08 New
        10
        It is believed that a cat with a cat, and a dog with a dog. And multicultural somehow all slide into pederasty. First, they abhor the culture of their ancestors, and then they and the woman are not the topic hi
        1. Raindragon
          Raindragon 19 October 2017 18: 13 New
          +1
          And what is better in your opinion - to live according to the concepts and culture of ancestors or to cook in a modern brew?
          1. Maki Avellevich
            Maki Avellevich 20 October 2017 08: 38 New
            0
            Quote: RainDragon
            And what is better in your opinion - to live according to the concepts and culture of ancestors or to cook in a modern brew?

            ancestors lived in their time that is, cooked in their modern brew each time has its own "brew"

            traditions cannot be abandoned as they accumulate the useful experience of generations, but one cannot resist any progress. we also have to add something useful to the good traditions. raised the bar higher than it was before us.
      2. Orionvit
        Orionvit 19 October 2017 22: 57 New
        +3
        Quote: RainDragon
        It is believed that nationalists are the best servants of the world master)

        A nationalist, by definition, is a person who loves his people and his culture. What you are now investing in this concept and you are personally investing is definitely a problem. The very definition of "nationalist", today completely lost its original meaning.
        1. Raindragon
          Raindragon 20 October 2017 01: 54 New
          +1
          Now, due to the increase in population density, cultural spheres overlap and conflict. Now the nationalist loves his people and culture, but ONLY his people and culture. The previously unified array is crushed, and according to Caesar, fragmented human masses are easier to manage)
          1. Orionvit
            Orionvit 20 October 2017 03: 37 New
            +3
            Quote: RainDragon
            but ONLY YOUR people and culture

            This is bad? Why, for example, should I love a foreign people and a foreign culture? Someone else’s culture may or may not like it, but love, sorry, needs your own. Some simply hate everything else, but this is called a different word, specifically Nazism.
            1. north
              north 20 October 2017 08: 24 New
              +1
              Hatred and hostility towards other nationalities is called chauvinism.
              1. Berber
                Berber 20 October 2017 08: 45 New
                +1
                Chauvinism is an exceptional attitude to your nation. Hostility is present, but secondarily. Primarily here is a neglect of other nations.
              2. Orionvit
                Orionvit 20 October 2017 11: 30 New
                0
                Hatred and hostility towards other nationalities is called chauvinism.
                Or so.
        2. Berber
          Berber 20 October 2017 08: 40 New
          +1
          I will add. Nationalism does not have a clear definition. Blurred concepts ranging from Nazism to multiculturalism. Therefore, everyone interprets as he wants. We have a multinational state, so Russian Nazism is the path to collapse and degradation. I like the approach of Peter I. Everyone who benefits Russia can be Russian. For example, Stalin in the questionnaire wrote in the column nationality: Russian - by origin of Georgians. There are many examples when representatives of small bunks brought great benefits to Russia.
          1. Orionvit
            Orionvit 20 October 2017 11: 35 New
            +2
            I will add. In the west, all from Russia (and earlier from the USSR) are considered Russian. Probably some nations that were not noted in the historical process can be proud of, but no. Some, small, but “proud” peoples, you see, do not agree with this. And they themselves are like a Latvian. Well, you get the point. But ambition, more than enough.
            1. Berber
              Berber 20 October 2017 13: 58 New
              +1
              I agree. But if you look carefully, we are not so different from each other.
    3. stas
      stas 19 October 2017 22: 32 New
      +6
      With words that nobody knows who said and when the world cannot be changed.
      It is necessary to build a fair social state in Russia, and not to conquer the world.
      There is nothing to conquer in such an economy.
      But the king is afraid to offend fascist economists and oligarchs.
      While the governors are nightmare, but we must take up the construction of a social state.
  2. Mik13
    Mik13 19 October 2017 15: 59 New
    +5
    ABOUT...
    Good article. The correct one.

    That is why now representatives of the Russian version of pan-jumpers will come to comment and how they will say it ...
    Went for popcorn ...
    1. Serhiodjan
      Serhiodjan 19 October 2017 16: 35 New
      12
      I’m not a pan, but I’m sure that the Russian people should and will be the basis of the development of Russia. Yes, I’m Russian, but in the West we are all Russian for them, it doesn’t matter whether you are a Chechen or a Kazakh, but in Russia everyone should have a clear and clear understanding that no thought about oppressing the titular nation should arise in any of the other peoples or the authorities haves, for the Russian people are patient, kind but strong and unstoppable in anger. So let them introduce a law on the backbone role of Russians for the country of Russia. Yes, I’m actually sure that it will be so. It doesn’t mean to expel or assimilate everyone, but it does mean to remember whose country it really is, it is not a Udmurt or Bashkir country, it is strange to a Russian, and it is better for a Udmurt and Bashkir to simply accept it as it is and not show off, and live in peace and friendliness remembering both their history and the fact that now they are part of the great people of the Russian Federation.
      1. Raindragon
        Raindragon 19 October 2017 17: 58 New
        +4
        Bullshit idea. Yes, Russians are the main nation of the Russian Federation, but offending the Udmurts and Bashkirs is like death. The fact that we need a basic language, basic cultural "attachment points", and the Russian language and Russian traditional foundations are also an axiom. But no more. Russian in Russia is far from 100%. Russia is a country of Udmurts, Siberians, their home. On fair rights with the Russians.
      2. You Vlad
        You Vlad 19 October 2017 18: 13 New
        +5
        Quote: Serhiodjan
        It doesn’t mean to kick everyone out or to assimilate, but it does mean to remember whose country it really is, it’s not a country of Udmurt or Bashkir, it’s strange to Russian, and it’s better for the Udmurt and Bashkir to just accept it as it is and not show off,

        This is the country of Udmurt and Bashkir and Altai and all the nationalities of its constituents! It is common to all, this is ours general home! And you better not show off!
        1. You Vlad
          You Vlad 19 October 2017 19: 36 New
          +4
          Hello from Altai wink
          1. ellada
            ellada 19 October 2017 22: 49 New
            +2
            Perfectly!!! Each Russian nationality has its own culture, traditions and nobody takes it away !! And they are all RUSSIANS. And in America the same thing. There are also many nationalities, but they are all Americans.
          2. privateer2000
            privateer2000 19 October 2017 23: 04 New
            +1
            well done.our army fighter.real well done.patz.respekt. Great Country. KS2000
        2. Evgeny Tseprunov
          Evgeny Tseprunov 20 October 2017 16: 14 New
          +1
          Absolutely right! It is the national cultures of all our peoples that are the source of Russia's strength. By encouraging and developing national cultures, enriching ourselves with them, and eating from their roots, we will be able to strengthen the ties between our peoples and the state as a whole. But, I emphasize, it’s national, in other words, primordial cultures, and not foreign mono-teachings. For all the "only true teachings" by definition do not recognize the others as they are, and only some "strong ruler" can keep them from a collision. The presence of such a ruler at the same time also means slowing down or even suppressing the country's development in every sense, since he will not be able to always make the right decisions in everything. So the rejection of all mono-teachings and the appeal to one’s own culture, respect for the cultures of neighboring peoples is the only way out and normal, all-Russian nationalism. And it is possible to do this only to people brought up in their culture among the many gods and therefore they will always find a common language with other peoples brought up in the same way. This is the basis of democracy. Here's an example: Hellas and Veliky Novgorod.
        3. already a Muscovite
          already a Muscovite 20 October 2017 20: 23 New
          0
          Quote: you Vlad
          This is the country of Udmurt and Bashkir and Altai and all the nationalities of its constituents! It is common to all, it is our common home! And you better not show off!

          "To you" is this to whom? ... huh ... Is it common to all, but not to "you"? So ?
          1. You Vlad
            You Vlad 20 October 2017 20: 27 New
            0
            Quote: already a Muscovite
            "To you" is this to whom? ... huh ... Is it common to all, but not to "you"? So ?

            You in this case, this is a person with the nickname Serhiodjan
  3. turbris
    turbris 19 October 2017 16: 16 New
    +6
    I just didn’t understand the title of the article “how to subordinate the world to your will”, what is Russia’s destiny in this? We had a lot of "subordinate" friends - they all fled and what, again, step on the same rake?
    1. Yurasumy
      19 October 2017 16: 35 New
      +3
      Submission to the will, not always violence. Not always.
  4. Curious
    Curious 19 October 2017 16: 32 New
    +1
    Now any project needs money. In the third part, the author should give sources of funding. Given that the project is global, the estimate will be decent. Peter the First even sentenced the tax on bast shoes in due time. It will be interesting to see the author's suggestions. Now besides bast shoes a lot of things have appeared.
    1. Yurasumy
      19 October 2017 16: 36 New
      +3
      The third part will examine a historical example (even two) of what happens to Russia when it begins to follow the path of nationalism.
      1. Curious
        Curious 19 October 2017 17: 35 New
        0
        Maybe you should start with this?
        1. Yurasumy
          19 October 2017 19: 32 New
          +3
          Not. Here it is just important that the supporters of nationalism in Russia speak out, and then with their slipper ...
    2. Catherine II
      Catherine II 19 October 2017 21: 51 New
      +1
      Quote: Curious
      Peter the First even tax on bastard sentenced in due time.

      Like when Sophia Alexeevna (however, Peter and Ivan were also). Under Peter, the most memorable of a beard ..
      Global resources are needed for a global project. And then without any idea what it is and what it is eaten with.
      Moreover, global projects do not require old methods of unification on the basis of the traditional (of the same religion or culture).
    3. privateer2000
      privateer2000 19 October 2017 23: 05 New
      0
      okay. the bast shoes are not bast shoes. and the ancestors of the country raised. Great Country raised. Weak. and. KS2000
  5. zoolu350
    zoolu350 19 October 2017 16: 53 New
    +1
    The author just did not say what kind of "global Idea" should be offered to Humanity? I think imperial socialism is a worthy idea that will pave the way for the Russian people to the Fourth Kingdom - the Eurasian Empire!
    1. Raindragon
      Raindragon 19 October 2017 18: 03 New
      +2
      And I want to fly to Mars on weekends - also a worthy idea))
      1. zoolu350
        zoolu350 20 October 2017 00: 04 New
        0
        Decent, no one argues, but under the power of the oligarchy of the Russian Federation, Mars does not shine for us, and with the path of development indicated by me, it is quite.
        1. Raindragon
          Raindragon 20 October 2017 01: 57 New
          0
          So this is a national idea - all that prevents is to destroy, what helps is to strengthen. Communism, too, was not built in a year.
          1. Maki Avellevich
            Maki Avellevich 20 October 2017 08: 44 New
            0
            Quote: RainDragon
            So this is a national idea - all that prevents is to destroy, what helps is to strengthen. Communism, too, was not built in a year.


            communism was not built. but I remember very much he was waiting for him after the school explained about him and said that soon. I thought I’ll go to the store and eat a bunch of ice cream.
            did not make it.
  6. NIKNN
    NIKNN 19 October 2017 17: 10 New
    +3
    What should be Russia: a national state for Russians or the home of many nations? Today this question heatedly discussed in Russian society.
    In what society? Who gave the right to speak for everyone? How many people are discussing? and who is discussing, and how heated are the passions? ...
    1. Yurasumy
      19 October 2017 17: 14 New
      +2
      I have been boiling this for the fourth year now and I will tell you the discussion is so heated. that the author has already received so many threats that even somehow "at ease".))) In general, there are a lot of passions.
      1. Curious
        Curious 19 October 2017 17: 39 New
        +3
        What you described is very similar to the everyday life of a party of couch globalist theorists.
        1. privateer2000
          privateer2000 19 October 2017 23: 08 New
          0
          not couch couchs. theoreticians are not theorists. The Great Country needs to be raised. Wrapped up dofiga. That’s the height of growth. figures. KS2000
  7. Raindragon
    Raindragon 19 October 2017 18: 22 New
    +4
    The article is about everything and nothing ... The fact that the Russian world is multinational is understandable and so, that you need to do something about it, and that the path of Nazism is a dead end too. A general concrete idea is needed, and the more specific the better - we still remember the rake of socialism. The main words of the article, with at least some sense, are that reforms in the national sphere are needed, without this in any way. But why is it at the end of the article, and not even highlighted as a consequence or conclusion - it is not clear
  8. Andrei from Chelyabinsk
    Andrei from Chelyabinsk 19 October 2017 18: 38 New
    +9
    Russian global project: how to subordinate the world to your will

    No offense to the author, but I just want to add: "... without attracting the attention of orderlies"
    1. Catherine II
      Catherine II 19 October 2017 21: 55 New
      +3
      Quote: Andrey from Chelyabinsk
      Russian global project: how to subordinate the world to your will

      No offense to the author, but I just want to add: "... without attracting the attention of orderlies"

      you reminded me of a joke that has ceased to be a joke and has become a reality

      Book, 262 pages, year of publication: 2016, binding: hot melt, format: 123x192, code ISBN: 9 785990 818781 (now it is a share laughing even)
      So readers read and praise the author.
      1. privateer2000
        privateer2000 19 October 2017 23: 10 New
        0
        good hehe haha. Better advised how to fix the situation. vis sho is done. grandchildren grow wiser-not easy. KS2000
  9. Jodina
    Jodina 19 October 2017 19: 16 New
    +2
    I would, in the place of the author, with Chechnya, as with a written bag, would not rush. And I would carefully study the issue of coming to power of its retention by Comrade Kadyrov. There are very interesting turns. And far from the fact that tomorrow everything will not unfold in Grozny in the other direction. God forbid, of course.
    1. Yurasumy
      19 October 2017 19: 33 New
      +1
      Do not wrap up. And the question here is not in Kadyrov
      1. Jodina
        Jodina 19 October 2017 21: 08 New
        0
        Yeah? Very interesting. But in whom, or in what, let me ask? The system there is built noble, to say nothing. However, this is a separate topic for a separate conversation. Not as part of the comments on the article.
  10. Arkady Gaidar
    Arkady Gaidar 19 October 2017 21: 33 New
    +3
    What are the primitive conclusions about more reasonable neighbors ?! Global peace, of course, will one day become inevitable. But this does not cancel the national priorities and the Russian world as a national state! By the Russian world, of course, we mean the community of peoples when united around Russia.
    What is the author driving at? What place does he offer us to take in the "global world"?
    Maybe such ideas should be disassembled in more depth and detail? And what about this kind of globalization:
    https://publizist.ru/blogs/110700/20577/-
  11. Flexsus
    Flexsus 19 October 2017 22: 19 New
    +3
    the essence and content of the article reminds Carnegie, "how to make friends and influence them." Russia has never sought to subordinate the world to its will. It is necessary to do and show different thinking, different from submission, for submission always causes opposition.
  12. gladcu2
    gladcu2 19 October 2017 22: 29 New
    +2
    I put the article plus for the efforts.

    The title of the article .... however ...

    Does anyone need it?
  13. demo
    demo 19 October 2017 22: 40 New
    +2
    Such global issues cannot be addressed in such a small article.
    Invented - ches about unkempt.
    About nothing.
    Consideration of these issues requires significantly more text and knowledge.
  14. Mikhail Zubkov
    Mikhail Zubkov 19 October 2017 22: 54 New
    +1
    Three letters to send such clever wukrov! Are there moderators on the resource?
    1. Yurasumy
      20 October 2017 00: 15 New
      +3
      And what to moderate? Or are you, as in Kiev, ready to chop heads for dissent? Then what is your difference from those who ride with pots on their heads in Kiev?
  15. Primoos
    Primoos 19 October 2017 23: 03 New
    +2
    Byzantine infection destroyed the Byzantine Empire, it also destroyed the Russian Empire. Maybe it's time to stop walking on the rake?
  16. brr1
    brr1 19 October 2017 23: 18 New
    +4
    And what can Russia offer as a global idea to the world at this stage? Orthodoxy? Powerful economic development? Great standard of living? Military assistance? But nothing substantial can.
    1. Raindragon
      Raindragon 20 October 2017 02: 00 New
      0
      Can offer a goal, and a global idea to achieve it
      1. brr1
        brr1 20 October 2017 07: 45 New
        +1
        So there is no common goal even within the country
    2. Oleg Tolstoy
      Oleg Tolstoy 20 October 2017 09: 21 New
      0
      And you would have looked around and figured out your own intellectual property.

      There is Russia what to offer, there is!
  17. aybolyt678
    aybolyt678 20 October 2017 05: 41 New
    +2
    In Russian imperial traditions, to make the son of a khan a prince, with a place at court, to educate him, and to a resident of a conquered country - citizenship, with the right to submit a petition to the tsar.
    In American imperial traditions, in their own country: to the Indians - genocide, and in a distant country: to plant a “democratic government”, give it loans for many years, which will unleash wars with neighbors, sell weapons to them and neighbors, and pump oil from all territories.
  18. Oleg Tolstoy
    Oleg Tolstoy 20 October 2017 09: 18 New
    0
    Global peace is inevitable. The development of technology and means of communication does not leave humanity a different path of development. So let it be better if we lay down its foundation, having invested our mentality and soul, and become the basis of a new global project, than “national Russia” will become the object of encroachments of its more reasonable neighbors.
    The author, and you were not late with the "laying the foundation"? What are you going to bring to the world?

  19. andrew xnumx
    andrew xnumx 20 October 2017 10: 00 New
    +2
    Of course we must choose the second way. and not only! We are doomed to recreate, to one degree or another, the outlines of the Soviet Union, we are obliged to revive the imperial project. We have no other way but to build a superpower, one of the centers of power. Otherwise, not only our country will face decay and death, but there will never be peace on earth. We must conduct a wise and at the same time tough policy, we must develop industry and finally revive the State Plan. It is necessary to strengthen the role of the state in the economy. And we must not only stubbornly develop our army, but put all our efforts into the development of science.
    1. ruff
      ruff 22 October 2017 15: 21 New
      +1
      An imperial project, a superpower, a center of power .... It is unrealistic from the word at all. The Russian economy is now 1.8% of the world, the population is 1.5% of the world. And the peoples of the former USSR the idea of ​​a neo-Russian empire, they need a fifth leg like a cow. If Russia had created a socially just, socialist state, taking into account the mistakes of the USSR, which would flourish in all respects, then the former brothers in the USSR would look at us differently, and it would be interesting for them to integrate with us. And the oppressors and neocolonialists, far more powerful and advanced than the Russian Federation, are already lacking in the world.
  20. Dmitry Kuzhilney
    Dmitry Kuzhilney 20 October 2017 10: 34 New
    +1
    he will have to concentrate on creating the conditions so that the slogan “Russia for Russians” is not just a slogan, but becomes a national idea.
    Dear Yurasumy, Russia is a multinational state. And, however pathetic it may sound, this is his strength.
  21. ruff
    ruff 22 October 2017 15: 12 New
    0
    The author is absolutely right when he alludes to the lack of prospects in the variant “Russia for Russians”. With such a slogan, after 50 years, only Non-Chernozemye will remain from us ... Maybe even the north-west. Only to invent a new idea does not make sense or time. The revival of Russia can only be realized in its movement towards socialism, but rather even towards the most radical version of communism. Otherwise, historical death by the end of the 21st century.