Lawmakers proposed to limit the activities of five US media in the Russian Federation

53
The Commission of the Council of the Federation for the Protection of State Sovereignty has proposed the Ministry of Communications to impose restrictions on 5-ti American media operating in the territory of the Russian Federation, reports RIA News.

Lawmakers proposed to limit the activities of five US media in the Russian Federation




The list includes five American media whose activities in Russia can be considered propaganda, not journalistic,
said a source in the Federation Council.

According to him, “Voice of America, Radio Liberty and CNN are on the list.”

The interlocutor said that the final decision is planned to be taken at the October 23 commission meeting, “then the proposal will be sent to the Ministry of Communications and Mass Media”.

Recall that last week the Ministry of Justice notified Radio Liberty’s media corporation and two more American media outlets about “possible restrictions under the law on mass media.”

Thus, Moscow intends to respond to the oppression of the Russian media in the United States.

The US authorities ordered the leadership of RT to register as a foreign agent before October 17, and also began proceedings in the congress about the possible influence of the Russian media through social networks on electoral processes in the country. Glavred RT Margarita Simonyan called the actions of the United States illegal and accused them of violating freedom of speech.
  • http://getonair.ru
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

53 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +14
    October 18 2017
    It's time to ban!
    1. +7
      October 18 2017
      Now liberals are cackling about freedom of speech and the fundamentals of shit democracy ...
      1. +7
        October 18 2017
        Twist their beaks Yes
      2. +8
        October 18 2017
        Quote: bagr69
        Now liberals are cackling about freedom of speech and the fundamentals of shit democracy ...

        Liberasts cannot but cluck. They cackle without reason. When was the owner who wanted the chicken broth excited about the chicken clucking?
      3. +9
        October 18 2017
        Quote: bagr69
        Now liberals are cackling about freedom of speech and the fundamentals of shit democracy.

        Let them cluck; the chickens cluck before they get into the soup.
        1. +1
          October 18 2017
          such a broth ... poisoning will be, before death.
          it’s better like in Kalmykia - a cattle cemetery, a warning fence and inscriptions - “anthrax”
        2. +6
          October 18 2017
          Vlad, welcome! hi
          Quote: 79807420129
          hens cluck before getting into the soup.

          Especially male hens. wink
        3. +8
          October 18 2017
          In this case, it’s rather not hens .. Roosters ... In the most unsightly sense of the word.
        4. +6
          October 18 2017
          Let them cluck; the chickens cluck before they get into the soup.
          Well, at least there will be a broth laughing
        5. +1
          October 18 2017
          “Now liberals are coddling about freedom of speech and the fundamentals of shit democracy

          Let the cluck, the hens cluck before they get into the soup.

          When liberal chickens cackle - they have increased adrenaline and they spoil the broth.
          Shut up their mouths at all, and not give unlimited access to the air ...
      4. +6
        October 18 2017
        How many channels do we have in FSA? One is correct, if it is closed, then 100% is closed, which means we must close 100% of the FS channels.
        1. GRF
          +1
          October 18 2017
          Ilt create rt2,3,4 ...
        2. +7
          October 18 2017
          Quote: figvam
          that means we must close 100% of the FSA channels.

          interesting thought, and most importantly - the right one good
    2. +4
      October 18 2017
      To be honest - I would not do that ...! Any ban in this area, except for outright terrorist, separatist, etc., is a certain indicator of the weakness of power! Let them broadcast - I’m not watching them. I like reading A&F, although this office has made many times more for sale of the Motherland than some CNN, but this is the beauty of a rational person - to compare, analyze and draw conclusions, and for this you need as many different points of view as possible!
      1. +3
        October 18 2017
        Finches

        There are still many different countries and channels in the world, let them broadcast. But to listen, watch, compare and analyze the stupid Washington propaganda, you don’t have much mind, we will not lose anything.
      2. +5
        October 18 2017
        Zyablitsev "To be honest ...."
        You are partially correct, but not everyone knows how to logically evaluate the content of the material.
        Unfortunately, those who can read between the lines are few.
    3. 0
      October 18 2017
      Quote: Alexander War
      It's time to ban!

      They are not afraid. Since the Cold War, there have been powerful radio stations in Western Europe. They will put repeaters in the countries of our former allies and everything will return.
      You need to hang satellites and broadcast transmissions through space to the United States!
      1. The comment was deleted.
        1. 0
          October 18 2017
          I wonder who generally listens recently in the medium and long ranges
          Forgot about the Internet?
    4. +2
      October 18 2017
      Quote: Alexander War
      It's time to ban!

      Allow, but ... Having supported the legislative level, break crazy money (in rubles!) For permitting work in limited mode!
      1. +1
        October 18 2017
        Quote: Starover_Z
        Allow, but ... Having supported the legislative level, break crazy money (in rubles!) For permitting work in limited mode!

        At the legislative level, enormous fines for fabricating and distributing fake news and even greater fines for distorting reality in the information space must be overcome. For the most heinous lie is half-truth. And to do this for all media, including Russian.
  2. +12
    October 18 2017
    limit the activities of five American media in the Russian Federation

    It is high time. I am amazed that so far this has not been done.
    1. +7
      October 18 2017
      Lawmakers proposed to limit the activities of five US media in the Russian Federation
      Do not restrict, but DO NOT!
      1. +4
        October 18 2017
        Quote: Black
        Do not restrict, but DO NOT!

        I support. Only this response was supposed to be instantaneous immediately after the sanctions against Russia Today in the United States. Somehow we breed cultural cultures. The fight is won not by one who has more mass, but who is more sophisticated.
        1. +7
          October 18 2017
          a bit too much we cultivate cultures

          Absolutely agree. It is sharper necessary, sharper .. So that would scream from otvetki. It is necessary not to let yourself come to your senses!
  3. +4
    October 18 2017
    Better late than never, but still somehow it’s all timid and not decisive, and for a long time it was necessary to cover these enemy voices.
  4. +2
    October 18 2017
    And who is watching or listening to this guano? It would be better NTV yes the first with TNT covered ...
    1. +6
      October 18 2017
      Quote: Fight
      And who is watching or listening to this guano? It would be better NTV yes the first with TNT covered ...

      NTV does not need to be closed, but TNT, TV3 and others with ugly children's cartoons and films of promoters and murders, definitely close. Rain, Ehomats also have no place on the air. In general, TV needs more educational channels.
  5. +2
    October 18 2017
    For arms and legs. Some programs of "Freedom" on the verge of such a foul-mom do not worry.
  6. +6
    October 18 2017
    Now, if you still catch the Americans to exchange for stolen citizens of RUSSIA. But, most likely, the government of RUSSIA will not dare to such a radical response. But in vain, flirted with the United States about diplomats, received the closure of diplomatic missions and other * plop *.
    1. +8
      October 18 2017
      catch Americans for exchange for stolen citizens of RUSSIA
      common sense! Highly. Question: when will the authorities deal with this issue?
      Though you come up with a ministry of "retaliatory measures" ....
  7. +2
    October 18 2017
    I did not even think that we have such. I would close TNT, Echo of Moscow ...
    1. +1
      October 18 2017
      Echo of Moscow is not necessary, because this radio very clearly shows all the hidden and open villains and scoundrels.
  8. +4
    October 18 2017
    Beautiful and smart woman.
  9. +8
    October 18 2017
    I would not forbid them, but introduced a system of fines for certain coverage of certain events and a free interpretation of history. And this is the constant mention of Russia in a negative way, the denial of the results of the Yalta conference, the contestation of the USSR Victory in the battle against Nazism, the defamation of the rulers of Russia and the USSR. I think that there will be enough fines. And by the way, apply the same practice to Russian TV channels.
    1. +6
      October 18 2017
      Quote: Altona
      I would not forbid them, but introduced a system of fines.

      ... three fines - ban for a week, 5 - ban for a month, 10 - perpetual ban am
  10. +1
    October 18 2017
    Faster, faster and in all matters !!! Everything goes with such attempts. Hmm, well, they certainly know the steering wheels.
  11. 0
    October 18 2017
    And things are still there. How much can you listen to the howl of Sirens, and even warmed on their chest. Only decide on the instances. It seems profitable to someone here - in Russia - so we have to figure out who got the snake warmed up.
  12. +1
    October 18 2017
    ... "accept", send, consider, sign ... bureaucrats were and are ... bully
  13. 0
    October 18 2017
    Quote: bagr69
    Now liberals are cackling about freedom of speech and the fundamentals of shit democracy ...

    ..they are anyone: liberals, liberoids, but never liberals ...
  14. 0
    October 18 2017
    Time to close missed. You need to pay close attention to them, make their activities transparent and ... and no closure is required
  15. 0
    October 18 2017
    I think Legislators were very shy and forgot about “This is Moscow” and others, obviously pro-Western media in Russia.
  16. 0
    October 18 2017
    it's time to limit for us it's painful
  17. 0
    October 18 2017
    From the beach !!! We pay with the same coin.
  18. +3
    October 18 2017
    The more bans, the more interest in these media and the belief in their veracity. We already went through this during the times of the USSR, when many believed in foreign voices unconditionally.
    An intelligent person can make his own opinion only on the basis of various sources.
    Look at the conflict with Ukraine, on our TV channels all points of view on Ukrainian are presented, only one and who is more trusted?
  19. 0
    October 18 2017
    Quote: Balu

    NTV does not need to be closed, but TNT, TV3 and others with ugly children's cartoons and films of promoters and murders, definitely close. Rain, Ehomats also have no place on the air. In general, TV needs more educational channels.

    And this is someone who likes it: someone pop, some pop, and some pop daughter.
  20. +1
    October 18 2017
    All their media must be formalized as propaganda. There will be no error.
  21. +1
    October 18 2017
    With the American media it’s clear. What about the Russians who are actively engaged in anti-Russian propaganda? Is it impossible because of the principle of "freedom of speech", which one so wants to show to the West? The West will not understand this, but underneath it a hole pit a warmer on the chest of a snake.
  22. +6
    October 18 2017
    RT and SATELLITE are broadcasting from our companies in the mattress, and we have two dozen striped companies. That's all and you need to limit their broadcasting, and some can be prohibited at all, especially Russophobic. There will be less stench.
  23. +1
    October 18 2017
    Well, why, like that, in European. Thinner is necessary. Editorial staff work on ter. Russia, next should work within the framework of our legislation. Here you are, gentlemen, our Criminal Code, here is the most humane court in the world. And for every inaccuracy, feel free to shave, pay a fine. And the amounts are such that the "village budget" depended on them. But when they refuse to pay, Toda "Well, you are such unlawful gentlemen, the Europeans and the Amerikans?" bully
    1. 0
      October 18 2017
      ??? And the adversary doesn’t bother much ... drinks
  24. 0
    October 18 2017
    Quote: KOT BYUN
    . I am amazed that so far this has not been done.

    Anglophiles, Russophobes and compradors in power against! And if they also get their hands gilded, they will close their media outlets, as in October 1993.
    Any whim for the money of the overseas hosts.
  25. 0
    October 19 2017
    Representations of NATO and the EU must be closed, and ALL US Consulate General.
  26. 0
    October 20 2017
    Can immediately cover the load yet another "Echo of Moscow" and "Rain"? Recognize them as Foreign Agents ...

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"