Military Review

ZVV troops receive upgraded PSNR-8М ground reconnaissance stations

16
The units of military intelligence of the Western Military District (ZVO), stationed in the Smolensk region, received modernized ground reconnaissance stations PSNR-8М, the press service of the ZVO reports.


This station allows you to detect various objects and targets at a distance of over 32 km in all weather conditions, including in the absence of optical visibility, the enemy setting up aerosol curtains, dusting or atmospheric smoke.

ZVV troops receive upgraded PSNR-8М ground reconnaissance stations


With the help of a modern portable reconnaissance station, military personnel in field conditions can detect and determine the coordinates of airborne and ground targets, including those moving, both in daytime and at night.

For the first time, intelligence officers will apply new technical means of intelligence during the delivery of a control test for the 2017 school year. These stations will help to carry out tasks of arranging ambushes, actions behind enemy lines, organizing observation posts, masking personnel and military equipment, as well as in the fight against sabotage and reconnaissance groups of a conditional enemy, faster and more efficiently.
- told the commander of the combined arms army ZVO Major General Alexander Peryazev.

Using the PSNR-8M resource, on the electronic map, the intelligence officers also work out questions of orientation to the terrain and assessment of the radar situation.
Photos used:
Russian Defense Ministry
16 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Corsair0304
    Corsair0304 17 October 2017 14: 28 New
    0
    And still - this is just an application (albeit a high-tech) to the eyes and ears of a reconnaissance soldier.
    1. okko077
      okko077 17 October 2017 16: 53 New
      +2
      A reconnaissance soldier is your poor backwardness .. Modern information technologies not only expand the range and capabilities of reconnaissance, but also allow you not to jeopardize the lives of soldiers, allow you to receive information without direct contact with the enemy, without the death of the most trained soldiers .... For reconnaissance use UAVs for example, and these radars are used more for monitoring position areas, for observation .... The misunderstanding and wretchedness of our theoreticians of modern warfare simply got ...
    2. Yarhann
      Yarhann 17 October 2017 18: 51 New
      +1
      you are fucked with eyes and ears which you will see in rain and wind at night and in fog)))
  2. Doliva63
    Doliva63 17 October 2017 14: 51 New
    +4
    So from the 15th year onwards, newer stations — 1L277 Sobolyatnik — were supposed to enter the troops (and even started already). So they said - to replace the outdated PSNR 8 and 8M. What the hell? belay
    1. Inok10
      Inok10 17 October 2017 20: 39 New
      +2
      Quote: okko077
      A reconnaissance soldier is your poor backwardness .. Modern information technologies not only expand the range and capabilities of reconnaissance, but also allow you not to jeopardize the lives of soldiers, allow you to receive information without direct contact with the enemy, without the death of the most trained soldiers .... For reconnaissance use UAVs for example, and these radars are used more for monitoring position areas, for observation .... The misunderstanding and wretchedness of our theoreticians of modern warfare simply got ...

      ... you just showed your own profoning by your own post ... for people like you, the article says:
      in all weather conditions, including in the absence of optical visibilitystaged by the adversary aerosol curtains, dusting or smoke the atmosphere
      ... there’s no one to talk to ... and, where are the weather conditions? ... The UAV has weather restrictions ... no one is home ... laughing
      Quote: Doliva63
      So from the 15th year onwards, newer stations — 1L277 Sobolyatnik — were supposed to enter the troops (and even started already).

      ... and do ...
      Quote: Doliva63
      So they said - to replace the outdated PSNR 8 and 8M. What the hell?

      ... no, not a substitute ... You messed up God's gift with Fried Eggs ... 1L277 "Sobolyatnik" is designed for completely different purposes, this is reconnaissance motorized infantry ... unlike PSNR-8M "Credo M1" which is a specialized station for KSA / ACS reconnaissance equipment art / RSZO batteries or the division "Kapustnik" ... the maximum range of the "Sobolyatnik" is less than 12 km., Compared to the "Credo M1", ... hi
      1. okko077
        okko077 17 October 2017 21: 08 New
        0
        Inok10, and your miserable backwardness! But what information systems, except for UAVs, do not enter anything else? Do you even know what combat information systems are? ... And UAVs are different ... But where will you put forward your PSNR-8M? Preliminary reconnaissance is needed in order to drag these suitcases with batteries that will quickly sit down ... what if there is an ambush or ... And what does your MLRS do not shoot beyond 40 km? This is all yesterday! ... They, BIS, provide reconnaissance and additional reconnaissance and coordinate determination and correction, if necessary ... and all in real time ... And the choice of weapons and their binding ... And yours " Kapushnik "even with an UAV cannot work in real time, your reaction time is calculated in minutes !!! Until they find out, until they determine the coordinates, until they transmit it to the radio station, until they take it, while they analyze and make a decision, until they again transfer it to the artillery system, while they lay down .... and the bearded left a long time ....
        1. Inok10
          Inok10 17 October 2017 23: 15 New
          +2
          Quote: okko077
          Inok10, and your miserable backwardness!

          ... A naive Child, with the illusions of pitama ... from playmaking kopmuternye ... laughing
          ... for all normal people-people, about the capabilities of PSNR-8M "Credo M1"
          formation of the track of a moving target on the screen, control of artillery firing at breaks with the issue of the coordinates of the shell rupture point and the deviation from the aiming point in the polar и rectangular coordinate system, built-in automatic health monitoring with displaying the health status of the blocks on the display screen, displaying the target situation on the background of the map of reflections from the terrain, storing a radar image, displaying the coordinates of targets on the display, entering and displaying an electronic map of the terrain, real time transmission of information about discovered goals to the consumer via digital communication channels.
          ... and all this at the level of the primary processing unit ПСНР-8М ... at KSA / ACS the calculation in real time is already arriving ... hi
          1. okko077
            okko077 18 October 2017 00: 16 New
            +1
            I haven’t been called like that for 50 years already ... A normal person, and your opponents do not have such systems as far as the illumination of this miracle is visible ... Moved off the topic, I can read your performance characteristics myself, only in a real battle you’ll count the losses yourself . Turned on a fool about gambling, wise guy ...
  3. reservist
    reservist 17 October 2017 14: 54 New
    +1


    You won’t see much with binoculars.
  4. Svateev
    Svateev 17 October 2017 15: 39 New
    +2
    tasks of setting up ambushes, operations behind enemy lines, organizing observation posts, camouflaging personnel and military equipment, as well as in the fight against sabotage and reconnaissance groups of a conditional enemy

    And our opponent is stupid, RTR does not have and cannot detect this source of electromagnetic radiation? We in Donbas can:
    "Harris radios supplied by the Americans to the Ukrainian army with their encryption device gave a special" handwriting "to the signal that stood out against the general background, which made it possible to calculate the coordinates of their owners and strike. What worked in Afghanistan or Iraq does not work in the case of an enemy armed with electronic warfare."
    https://vpk.name/news/192117_boennyie_uroki_donba
    ssa_s_tochki_zreniya_amerikancev.html
    And our enemy there in the Donbas is also detecting cell phones of militias and delivering mortar strikes.
    1. Yarhann
      Yarhann 17 October 2017 18: 58 New
      +2
      the point is not the stupidity of the enemy, but the fact that such a technique should be in service. For example, at the same border guards it is successfully used.
      In general, the use of any technique requires working out its tactics and not as stupidly as they did, they turned on radars and lights on the whole district and then they met a mini from heaven at positions.
      1. Svateev
        Svateev 18 October 2017 02: 01 New
        +1
        Quote: Yarhann
        Not so stupidly as they did, they turned on the radars and lights on the whole district and then they met the mini from heaven at the positions.

        But how else can you use ground-based radar? How can you not fonit the whole district. if this is the way the station works ?!
        Quote: Yarhann
        For example, it is successfully used by the same border guards ..

        For police purposes - yes, you can. When a blow from the adjacent side is not expected, then such a contraption is a great help.
        But the article is about the sun.
        1. Yarhann
          Yarhann 18 October 2017 20: 43 New
          +1
          as well as air defense radars in combat conditions - passive mode only receiving and from time to time switching on for all-round visibility. Here it’s the same thing - if it’s in combat conditions, then of course the inclusion is only short-term for determining the enemy’s location. If this is work on the border - that is, when our position is known (work on the outpost or along the border) - then you can sound constantly.
          I wrote above that for any weapon it is necessary to develop tactics for its use in certain conditions.
          For example, if you are located at positions to protect approaches to them - that is, your position is already known to the enemy, but we use technical means so that the enemy could not go unnoticed. It’s just that with the help of technical means it’s much easier to control much larger areas - that is, we use fewer soldiers for this and have time to take adequate countermeasures.
          But I don’t imagine how to redeem such funds during the offensive and during the maneuver - there will most likely be UAVs with various reconnaissance systems, including radar ones, to the place.
          That is, for example, I see the use of such equipment on a march in combat conditions when it is necessary to camp - that is, intelligence goes forward and is positioned along the column and also at the point of the expected parking lot - and controls the approach paths. That is, in what conditions you can apply, you can put on a lot - I'm just not a military strategist and tactician - not Suvorov in a word and I can’t say exactly under what conditions such equipment will be effective - but I can assume)
          1. Svateev
            Svateev 20 October 2017 23: 17 New
            0
            Quote: Yarhann
            as well as air defense radars in combat conditions - passive mode only receiving and from time to time switching on for all-round visibility

            Firstly, what does an air defense radar take in passive mode? If you mean standby mode, then this is not a passive mode, this is a radar that does not work.
            Passive - this is the mode of operation of the RTR, when it, without radiating anything, itself receives signals emitted by the target: its radar, radio communications, etc.
            Secondly, what is the passive regime of PSRD? Can she carry out RTR? Where is this indicated?
            Quote: Yarhann
            if this is in combat conditions, then of course the inclusion is only short-term to determine the location of the enemy

            Briefly ... Well, let's figure out how much.
            So, the enemy has RTR in passive mode, that is, it does not emit anything and therefore we do not see it. And therefore RTR works constantly, it is not afraid of our blow. And therefore, as soon as we turned on the PSRD, the RTR detected it right away. Immediately - this is 5-10 seconds. PSNR work. That is, in 1,5-3 minutes the position of the PSRP is covered by the artillery strike.
            PSNR managed to escape? Well, let’s say that the PSRD was put on the “Bobby” and therefore can run away without turning off the station.
            There is no even close talk about constant radar observation.
            And what will the minute of the PSRD work? In the best case, we find metal objects disguised that are not seen in the optical range. Everything.
            Quote: Yarhann
            your position is already known to the enemy

            In this case, there’s nothing to talk about, I’m finished, artillery, mortars, planning bombs, etc. enemy means mixed me with the ground.
            It’s better to suppose that my positions are not known to the enemy and I set PSNR aside from my positions and .... The enemy destroyed a couple of shells or mines with PSNR because he wants to come to me unnoticed. And the location of the PSRD - here it is, is shining ...
            Understand a simple thing: the active system unmasks both the fact of its work (reconnaissance, ranging, etc.) and its location. Not to destroy it is simply a sin for any adversary.
            1. Yarhann
              Yarhann 21 October 2017 02: 04 New
              +1
              I’m not a pancake system developer. You’ve thrown work options and its characteristics here - these are all fantasies - the point is that. I just estimate the reality of its application - and I pointed out that if it’s stationary (border guards reconnaissance on patrol accompanied by convoys, etc.), but in attacking orders I don’t have much idea of ​​using such a technique - just any detection system that is bolted to a vehicle or plane is much better - if only because it’s mobile in real time.
              I didn’t say that like we’re phoning and no one is touching us like suckers are lit up and no one will throw a chumadan with SAU and so on - it goes without saying that the means of detection and reconnaissance and the fight against them are a priority. But damn there are cases as I described - an outpost - convoy wiring etc. and so on - that is, ensuring perimeter security - there’s nowhere to go without technology - people are ineffective and very expensive (as a resource - the equipment was blown up and to hell with it and look for these pack home send in zinc - in short is troublesome). In general, I believe that the coming conflicts of 10-20 years will be exclusively local and all built on a comprehensive intelligence tool from human intelligence by humans to smy advanced robotic systems. Now there is no problem of destroying the target - it has already been solved 20-30 years ago for all developed countries - the problem is in obtaining operational information from the battlefield not from attacking advanced units, namely from various robotic systems.
              Therefore, such systems are firstly the intelligence system as I pointed out above, but if warned, it means armed. After all, we are competing in how much anyone knows how to accurately determine the enemy’s position through various technical means — I pointed out the experience of the air defense war in Yugoslavia — the guys worked very well there. Similar tactics of using technical means were in both Vietnam and Korea - here I am talking purely about air simply because even then there were no miniaturized infantry radar reconnaissance equipment.
              I will repeat the tactics of application - its development and training of operators is a success - well, damn it like in any weapon - and the specific characteristics of the system, its vulnerabilities and strengths are no longer for me, but for those who deploy systems in the troops - but mine point of view that the technical means of reconnaissance in any modern army is, if not the most important thing, the second after the main thing - information about the battlefield is a victory - it’s with intelligence that we always defeated the enemies because we hit the right place at the right time - the quantity was not ours and will not be .
  5. Vasya Vassin
    Vasya Vassin 17 October 2017 22: 09 New
    0
    Wow! I do not know what it is, but cool, on three legs, and with a telescope!