Military Review

The Times: Russia funds the Taliban in a war against NATO forces

51
British newspaper The Times It comes out with material stating that Russia is allegedly funding the Taliban terrorist group (* banned in Russia). The material of the British reporter Anthony Loyd is called "Russia finances the Taliban in the war against NATO forces."


The most interesting thing is that the British journalist, as he himself declares, bases his material on direct contact with the “treasurer” of the terrorist structure. Given the fact that the Times does not act without the guardianship of the British special services, we can make a simple conclusion: the British special services themselves have direct contact with the Taliban, in fact suggesting that they give out disinformation in the interests of London.

It is this fact that makes it possible to “appreciate” the publication of Loyd from Kabul. Here are some quotes from a British newspaper giving an interview site for one of the Taliban leaders:
Russia sponsors Taliban military operations (*) against NATO in Afghanistan. This is done through a secret program for the sale of fuel. Russian intelligence is directing oil tankers across the border with Uzbekistan to Hairaton. From there, fuel goes to dummy firms affiliated with the Taliban (*). This is worth about 2,5 million dollars per month. They go directly to the Taliban treasury (*). Russia is stepping up its support for the movement, while also trying to counteract ISIS (*) in Afghanistan.


The Times: Russia funds the Taliban in a war against NATO forces


Taliban Treasurer:
We resell this fuel and distribute the money directly among the commanders.


Further, there is a “wonderful” sentence from an interview with a terrorist:
We accept help from the Russians without hunting, but to continue the struggle we have to use it.


I wonder why earlier British journalists did not interview the Taliban terrorists - for example, when they carried out attacks on NATO military bases, and this has been going on in Afghanistan for about 15 years ... And one more question: does this mean that the controlled British intelligence intelligence journalists have direct access to any of the field or financial commanders of the Taliban? ..

And for some reason, the Times has overlooked such an interesting topic as the emergence of the Taliban. Was it not because of the actions of the American and British intelligence services that this terrorist structure in Afghanistan appeared?
Photos used:
http://www.globallookpress.com
51 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Wild_grey_wolf
    Wild_grey_wolf 17 October 2017 12: 57 New
    10
    We also have Borsch and Buckwheat, and it’s very cold in winter.
    1. 79807420129
      79807420129 17 October 2017 13: 09 New
      14
      We accept help from the Russians without hunting, but to continue the struggle we have to use it.

      Go to the bazaar, maybe they will sell you: wink
      1. iConst
        iConst 17 October 2017 13: 25 New
        +4
        Quote: 79807420129
        Go to the bazaar, maybe they will sell you:

        laughing
        The Times: "Russia finances the Taliban in the war against NATO forces"
        Ha-ha-roshaya thought!
        1. Nashensky city
          Nashensky city 17 October 2017 13: 30 New
          +7
          It remains a mystery - how Russia has time everywhere ... laughing
          And on the other hand, if striped, then why should we not?
          1. cniza
            cniza 17 October 2017 13: 47 New
            +2
            Quote: Wild_Grey_Wolf
            We also have Borsch and Buckwheat, and it’s very cold in winter.


            How do they want to shift their "tricks" to Russia.
      2. Jedi
        Jedi 17 October 2017 13: 28 New
        +8
        Another verbal miscarriage from the Western press. "Bored, girls." (with)
        1. 34 region
          34 region 17 October 2017 14: 45 New
          +2
          13.28. Jedi! Well don't tell! To the question why, the question follows, why? So they answer why. Another question is why Russia does not oppose the United States supporting anti-American movements? Here we love to cry and express concern. And why do not we give them in the face? Weak?
          1. Jedi
            Jedi 17 October 2017 14: 50 New
            +5
            Yesterday I wrote, albeit on a different occasion: to achieve a certain date, a lot can change - both the rhetoric of politicians, and the actions of the Defense Ministry in general and the VKS and the MTR in particular.
            1. Strategy
              Strategy 18 October 2017 20: 22 New
              0
              Correct - upon reaching
      3. Olfred
        Olfred 18 October 2017 08: 39 New
        +1
        and honor and conscience why ??? laughing hi
        1. Strategy
          Strategy 18 October 2017 20: 23 New
          0
          how much is written in solid!
    2. Vlad.by
      Vlad.by 17 October 2017 13: 27 New
      +3
      "Yes, the Russians also delivered ISIS weapons to Aleppo and to Deir ez-Zor! I will not see a century of will, I personally drove it!"
      1. oldzek
        oldzek 17 October 2017 21: 03 New
        0
        and the Times also wrote that Inspector Lestrade is Scotland's best inspector .....
        1. Strategy
          Strategy 18 October 2017 20: 24 New
          0
          Right - Scotland Yard!
  2. Holoy
    Holoy 17 October 2017 12: 57 New
    +2
    It’s time for the Taliban to support! We must send them more weapons!
    1. aszzz888
      aszzz888 17 October 2017 13: 03 New
      0
      Holyday Today, 12:57 am New
      It’s time for the Taliban to support! We must send them more weapons!

      ... in Afghanistan, they are already in a hickey with the Ishilovites (banned in the Russian Federation) ... here let them ...
      1. Holoy
        Holoy 17 October 2017 13: 10 New
        +2
        No, they have different goals with Ishil. The Taliban are beneficial for us, for the USA’s response ...
        1. Incvizitor
          Incvizitor 17 October 2017 13: 35 New
          +1
          Well, if only pi.dos will be killed, then of course it makes sense, only these Taliban are very unpredictable ...
        2. Strategy
          Strategy 18 October 2017 20: 27 New
          0
          That's right - ISIS. This is an abbreviation (the abbreviation of the first letters of the words of the name is “The Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant”)!
    2. Finches
      Finches 17 October 2017 13: 06 New
      +7
      NATO intelligence and EW battalion working in Ukraine against militias, almost openly so what? Why not write about it better! And then the Taliban ... We and the Martians advise on planning the operation "Invasion" c landing on the roof of the White House ... laughing
  3. Dezinto
    Dezinto 17 October 2017 12: 58 New
    +8
    From Russians we accept help without hunting


    Oh, what is that phrase ??? Outstanding writing all !!!

    The Taliban take money with pleasure anywhere, but from the Russians they say “these Russians are direct, well, well, we’ll take what you are. Even the Taliban are not like you are Russian.”

    What a bastard !!!! What does he carry?

    AND! Well, that’s what it bears, such a double feed from d ... ma, in the first place, Russians like type, and secondly, even the type of Taliban treat us like that.

    Well, what the western dibilchik from Los Angeles grasps for a sweet soul. And form a look for yourself.
    1. Anarchist
      Anarchist 17 October 2017 13: 05 New
      17
      It is necessary to show how in England they disdain Russia ...
      `` It seems to me that Brother Fox is not a gentleman! ''
  4. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 17 October 2017 13: 00 New
    0
    Goebels' training manual "in the service of the British has already proven itself more than once. Not surprising. Now the American media will pick up and it will no longer be known in what circle. Kohl raised once again a debilitated topic, then things are bad in the coalition.
    1. Strategy
      Strategy 18 October 2017 20: 30 New
      0
      That's right - Goebbels (from the name Goebbels - a German politician, one of the closest associates and loyal followers of Adolf Hitler)!
  5. Bronevick
    Bronevick 17 October 2017 13: 01 New
    +2
    And who in Afghanistan supported the Taliban in the 80s?
    1. Kerensky
      Kerensky 17 October 2017 13: 15 New
      0
      Well, the Stingers and Blowpipes still ride in the mountains on donkeys ....
      1. Vlad.by
        Vlad.by 17 October 2017 13: 31 New
        +1
        This is you in vain! Arrow and Eagle ride there no less.
        But - not caught - not a thief. Although, Anglo-Saxon caught stealing is also not a thief. He simply defends democracy.
        1. Kerensky
          Kerensky 17 October 2017 15: 41 New
          0
          This is you in vain! Arrow and Eagle ride there no less.

          I agree that no less. And why in vain? Arrows with Needles are at least “participants”, but who blocked Blipepipes ?!
          1. Vlad.by
            Vlad.by 17 October 2017 21: 56 New
            0
            So those who are also Arrows with Needles. And this is not at all the Union or the Russian Federation.
  6. aszzz888
    aszzz888 17 October 2017 13: 01 New
    0
    British newspaper The Times ... "Russia is financing the Taliban in the war against NATO forces"

    ... and also tumbles into Pokemon ... bully bully
  7. Same lech
    Same lech 17 October 2017 13: 02 New
    +5
    The British special services themselves have direct contacts with the Taliban, in fact, offering those to issue misinformation in the interests of London.
    Misinformation in general is the hobby of the British intelligence ...
    I recall GESS's visit to London and then Hitler’s sudden decision to change the direction of the Wehrmacht’s strike from England to the USSR ... undoubtedly these two events are connected with the misinformation of the British pushing it to Hitler.
    And now the Anglo-Saxons, as always, are true to themselves and are probably preparing a disu in relation to RUSSIA (dirty tricks ... whatever you want) ... the only goal is to weaken our country as much as possible.
    1. tol100v
      tol100v 17 October 2017 13: 19 New
      +3
      Quote: The same Lech
      And now the Anglo-Saxons, as always, are true to themselves and are probably preparing a disu in relation to RUSSIA (dirty tricks ... whatever you want) ... the only goal is to weaken our country as much as possible.

      They are not dirty day, not just a day, and hours can not live! And lies and hypocrisy are their trump card!
      1. 34 region
        34 region 17 October 2017 14: 50 New
        +1
        13.19. Tolstov! And the trump card of Russia is naivety and credulity !? wassat Why are we constantly bred like rabbits? winked laughing
  8. d ^ Amir
    d ^ Amir 17 October 2017 13: 06 New
    +3
    The magical power of Afghan hashish !!!!!! Bashka, the second and now without leaving the office in London, an interview with the Taliban .... epic !!!!!!!
    1. Vlad.by
      Vlad.by 17 October 2017 13: 36 New
      +2
      So London is the financial center! These evil Russians are compelled to come to London, take the cash from their accounts and hand them over to such white and fluffy, but also evil Taliban treasurers.
      But Mi-6 is not asleep, and all the transmission facts are strictly recorded.
      1. Svarog51
        Svarog51 17 October 2017 14: 31 New
        +7
        But Mi-6 is not asleep, and all the transmission facts are strictly recorded.

        The British Mi-6 noticed how the Russian Mi-8 delivered something somewhere and strictly fixed it. good
  9. Egorovich
    Egorovich 17 October 2017 13: 27 New
    +5
    The thief shouts: "Hold the thief." British foolishness on the face.
  10. The comment was deleted.
  11. bogart047
    bogart047 17 October 2017 13: 58 New
    +1
    oh, we supplied the Taliban with weapons in the 70-80s against the USSR, and now they are supplied against us. And what for us ???
  12. Strashila
    Strashila 17 October 2017 14: 02 New
    +2
    That the sale of drugs has become unprofitable ??? “This is about $ 2,5 million per month.” ... that this amount is for billions of dollars in turnover ... just buyers from the post-Soviet space in Central Asia pay for drugs not with dollars, but with gas ... this fact outraged the Times. .. we don’t see video reports of the valiant US Air Force about the destroyed “Russian” tankers .... or they don’t have enough fuel for sorties ... they sold it to the Taliban, and the Uzbeks competed with them ... ???
  13. NEXUS
    NEXUS 17 October 2017 14: 05 New
    +3
    The feeling is that the State Department is tightly hooked on watching REN-TV.
  14. arane
    arane 17 October 2017 14: 06 New
    0
    If it were so the treasurer would have already separated his head from the body
  15. Disorder
    Disorder 17 October 2017 14: 32 New
    0
    Yeah. And the treasurer is a neighbor from the room nearby. Flashed and fucked up the report.
  16. Vard
    Vard 17 October 2017 14: 42 New
    0
    The Times was once, and now it has turned yellow ... this is how worldly glory passes ...
  17. Sektant
    Sektant 17 October 2017 16: 05 New
    0
    Why not ? Indians fighters cover Daesh against Russia, why don't we have a dog too?
  18. Turgon
    Turgon 17 October 2017 16: 24 New
    0
    And that makes sense
  19. Dreiko11
    Dreiko11 17 October 2017 16: 54 New
    0
    As usual, without evidence, the charges are rained
  20. midshipman
    midshipman 17 October 2017 17: 55 New
    +1
    Have you forgotten how the USA and England armed the Dushmans in the 80s? And now get it in full. Not a single American will leave alive. I have the honor
  21. APASUS
    APASUS 17 October 2017 19: 33 New
    +1
    I remember our defeat in Afghanistan and the position of the sworn “partners” in this matter. Now and the time is right, the end justifies the means, if the Taliban kick the Yankees back, then the Taliban must be supported.
  22. Andryukha G
    Andryukha G 17 October 2017 19: 59 New
    +1
    If the Taliban rule in Afghanistan, then drug trafficking will stop in the direction of Russia, that's why the Americans (who make money on this) and others like it, are henchmen from NATO.
  23. rocket757
    rocket757 17 October 2017 20: 08 New
    +3
    Yes, sho we cheat, make excuses ... we are about the so-called. "allies" must take care ... Schaub was not bored by them, Schaub they could perform their heroic exploits !!!
    Let them fight!
  24. David D. Dillinger
    David D. Dillinger 22 October 2017 22: 35 New
    0
    NATO is fighting the TALIBAN ??? And as success, where is the result ???