FSB Border Service received a new guard ship "Devotee"

The patrol ship of the second rank "Devotee" (project 22460) arrived from St. Petersburg to the permanently-stationed location - the port of Murmansk, reports RIA News report of the press service of the Government of the Murmansk region.

Patrol ship project 22460 "Hunter"

Deputy Governor Alexei Tyukavin congratulated the border department of the Federal Security Service of the Russian Federation on receiving a new ship.

In the era of global warming, when more and more new areas of bioresource production appear, when hydrocarbon production is actively developing, the new capabilities of the ship will be useful to ensure Russia's interests in protecting our industrial activity in the Arctic,

he said.

The report notes that the “Devotee”, designed by the Central Maritime Design Bureau “Almaz” in St. Petersburg, is a modern patrol ship that embodies the most modern achievements of national science and technology. ”

It is designed "to perform a wide range of tasks assigned to the coast guard - patrolling the territorial waters of near and distant maritime zones, protecting the state border and the continental shelf, conducting rescue operations, as well as carrying out rescue operations and eliminating the consequences of natural disasters" .

Along with the protection of the border, the ship can be used to combat terrorism and maritime piracy.

Comments

[Scoun]

Hmm ... the name is such that afraid of love ..
roofing felts betrayed by someone, roofing felts betrayed by someone .... amateurs need to be afraid of such as the "flower" Hyacinth or Acacia, or Chrysanthemum are afraid

[Zibelew]

Devotee of Russia. The new PSKR inherited the name PSKR of project 1124P, decommissioned in 2002.

[79807420129]

Quote: Scoun

is a modern patrol ship, which embodies the most modern achievements of domestic science and technology ”

Here is some performance characteristics

[Jedi]

Vlad, thanks for the video - there’s no need to search for it yourself.

[Grandfather]

Quote: Scoun

felts loyal to someone, felts loyal to someone ..

In Russian, was it a troek?

[Per se.]

Quote: Dead Day

In Russian, was it a troek?

Whoever had a troika would hardly have noticed this nuance of the Russian language at all. ScounAll right caught.

But the question still arises. How could it happen that “devotee” can mean both loyalty and treachery? Is it the same word or not? Here in English, for example, these are two different words: devotee (faithful) - devoted, devotee by someone - betrayed. And in Russian, they came together in the same sound and graphic form: the adjective "devotee" (loyal friend), the sacrament "devotee" (daughter, loyal to the mother) and the participle from the verb "betray" (betrayed by someone). And we can also bring something to the fire, for example, and this object will also be a “devotee” (devotee to the fire).

The ship is beautiful, the name does not cause the same unequivocal assessment.

[Nevsky_ZU]

Whoever had a troika would hardly have noticed this nuance of the Russian language at all. Scoun, I got it right

Always interested in the question, as a person who knows very badly English. Whose language and world, richer - English or Russian?
On the one hand, it seems to be Russian, which has many words and definitions, and even contradictions for some event, etc. But on the other hand, as Americans, or rather their English progenitors, can intuitively distinguish words from the mouth, like: "you are a bad boy," "you are a bad guy," "you are a bad baby," if one word sounds at the end: you are bad. " bou ", for example. Mimicry and pantomime, and intonation? Are they really so scarce? As for me, this is a talent of consciousness, so to define what he had in mind.

[Per se.]

Dear Vyacheslav! I will say right away that I am not a fan of the English language, and I hardly know it better than you. Nevertheless, on the basis of his acquaintance with English from school and the university, he drew conclusions that are also close to what is indicated in your commentary. You compare the translation of the "bad boy", the translation of "Fuck" looks even more vivid, where even the Russian language has a much broader meaning. Earlier, in the comments I spoke about my admiration for the uniqueness of the Russian language, its flexibility, the ability to quickly adapt to the meaning. In combat, a Russian can become very brief, because of the possibility and clarity of abbreviations, in lyrics, on the contrary, can be filled with the whole palette of shades. In the English dictionary, it is not possible to correctly read a word without transcription, in Russian the alphabet itself is based on sounds, so that you can write any foreign word in Russian letters, read it, and they will understand you. In English this is not possible. In the animal world there are no words, and, for example, by the barking of a dog, you can determine what it can mean. If the language does not have an exact match of words, then the "bad boy" in a different translation is essentially the same "barking". If the vocal apparatus is strongly strained, the words are badly spoken, there are difficult to distinguish sounds that are close to the sounds of animals, it is unlikely that such a language can be considered well developed, far removed from the animal world. Russian here compares favorably with many world languages, including English, I would even say that Russian is the language of God. A nation having such a language, by definition, cannot be ordinary and must fulfill its great mission on our planet, on the bright side of goodness and justice, human humanism.

[Mar.Tirah]

A good ship. In my time one could dream of such a thing. And comfort, and weapons, and seaworthiness, correspond to the task.

[aszzz888]

... what can I say - handsome! ... I hope it will serve the Fatherland !!! ... like his crew - faithfully !!!

[K-50]

All the same, in my opinion, in vain on the "border guard" is the AK-630, better than the AU-220 57-mm caliber. For point fire, warning is more convenient, the firing range is higher, and even for UAVs it is more convenient to shoot from it.

[rocket757]

It would be nice if the Almaz-Antey concern participated in the project.
Hide a couple of CALIBERS in it ... here would be a surprise for the aggressor !!!
Like there he was, the aggressor - bah-hh and his netuti !!!

[Serg65]

Quote: K-50

even for UAVs it is more convenient to shoot from it.

Have you shot with AK-630?

[K-50]

Quote: Serg65

Have you shot with AK-630?

What for? Few videos on the internet?
And the goat understands that at a distance close to the limit there will be a large dispersion.
Now imagine. A poacher or other intruder leaves for the water border, in order to prevent him from doing this, it is necessary to open fire. With such dispersal, the crew can be multiplied by zero, which is not a “buzz” in the eyes of the “world community”. And AU-220 or AK-716 (726) can easily solve this "problem", since they have an aiming range many times greater, allowing targeted fire to prevent the intruder from leaving.
What am I wrong?

[Serg65]

Quote: K-50

And the goat understands that at a distance close to the limit there will be a large dispersion.

630 AK creates a range of 0,3-0,6 m, dispersion 1m at 1 km, effective distance 4 km. Those. dispersion is perfectly acceptable.

Quote: K-50

With this dispersion, the crew can be multiplied by zero

You can multiply by zero from any gun mount if you shoot directly at the intruder, especially at a great distance.

Quote: K-50

And AU-220 or AK-716 (726) can easily solve this "problem"

About the AU-220 in the marine version, I have not heard, maybe A-220M? If A-220M, then the patroller in 630 tone is too big. AK -716 ??? For the first time, I honestly hear about this! Well, the AK-726 is somehow not too big in size either, and it’s outdated a long time ago.

Quote: K-50

The poacher or other intruder leaves for the water border

A pillar of water raised by the 160 AK-630 shells, at 10 meters in the nose of the intruder, beat off any desire to escape the chase

[K-50]

Quote: Serg65

AK-716 ??

There is a single-barrel 76 mm caliber, too lazy to look for its designation exactly.

effective distance of 4 km. Those. dispersion is perfectly acceptable.

For me, it will not be enough.

About the AU-220 in the marine version, I have not heard, maybe the A-220M?

It is quite possible that it was too lazy to clarify the modification of the 57-mm gun, as if they wanted to put it on the icebreaking frigate.
How many AK-630 has a minimum queue? Its cost? And what is the cost of one or two shells 57 mm?

[Serg65]

Quote: K-50

For me, it will not be enough.

Who are you going to shoot at, my friend?

Quote: K-50

a modification of the 57-mm guns, like they wanted to put it on the icebreaking frigate as well.

It is only supposed to be put into service, but the Navy somehow does not burn with desire, let's say it is more promoted by the military-industrial complex than the Navy is burning with the desire to adopt.

Quote: K-50

How many AK-630 has a minimum queue? Its cost? And what is the cost of one or two shells 57 mm?

Well, if this is the case, then it’s cheaper to give the slingshot to the crew!
Let's go the other way! AK-630 has established production, i.e. It will be definitely cheaper than launching in the A-220M series. AK-630 weighs 3800 kg, which is 2200 kg less than A-220M. AK-630 is a barbette installation, but for A-220M we need, let’s say, a hole in the deck with a diameter of 3 m (installation complexity). Well and the last, the 57 projectile is equipped with a radio fuse, which greatly increases its cost.
For AK-360, the minimum queue of 60 shells, for A-220M 10 shells, in total costs, the price will not depend on the number of shells

[K-50]

Quote: Serg65

The AK-360 has a minimum burst of 60 shells, the A-220M has 10 shells

And what about the A-220M there is no single fire?

Its only supposed to put into service

How difficult it is to adapt the AU-220 and should fit in weight, if it can be installed on light armored vehicles in an uninhabited version. Plus, there are no obstacles in terms of ammunition, a high-explosive high-explosive shell is our everything!

[Serg65]

Quote: K-50

How difficult is it to adapt the AU-220 and by weight it should fit

here is the au-xnumx

And here is A-220M

Do you feel the difference?

[K-50]

Quote: Serg65

If the A-220M, then it’s too big for a 630 tone patrol officer.

On the "Buyanah-M" in general, "weaving" stands with a slightly larger displacement.

[Serg65]

Quote: K-50

On the "Buyanah-M" in general, "weaving" stands with a slightly larger displacement.

MRK Buyan-M at 300 tone heavier.

[Nemesis]

On the one hand, it’s good, but if you think about it, it’s not so ... Too weak armament of this ship precludes its combat use during, even not a large, regional conflict, and new warships, this is exactly what the Russian Navy lacks now .

[1vlad19]

Do border guards need new ships? They have a security function, not warfare.

[Nemesis]

In the event of a military conflict, the border guards will have to take the first blow on themselves and in order to have a chance of survival they need better armed ships than this yacht, on which you can only ride girls and shoot a raven from it, from CORD

[1vlad19]

First strike, etc. etc. Who told you that? The Navy does not have radars, they do not know the situation? They will immediately give out the classification of ships suitable for the state border and the border guard will not climb on them headlong. But the poachers to delay the very thing.

[Nemesis]

Border ships of the type Nereus were built in the USSR and they had relatively decent armament: 100 and 30 mm guns, 533 mm torpedo tubes, RBUs ​​and air defense systems of the near zone ... The USSR also had radars, but they knew how to think, because hooliganism cost dearly in 1941 ... And it’s not a sin for you to do this, otherwise dubious cost savings can seriously hurt ...

[1vlad19]

In the USSR, they did a lot of things, just did not use it in reality, and training firing is combat training. The Pacific Fleet also handed over to the MAKs to us, that there was no sense in this, there were a lot of weapons, but they stood forever in the raid, patrols were carried out by the Aist boats

[Nemesis]

So you do not confuse boats and relatively large ships that go relatively far from the coast. For boats, then just a machine gun is enough, and for ships larger you need to put something more serious. Let not RCC, but at least SAM, with a small number of missiles, for example, 12 units. For a serious fight, it’s not enough, but for the first time you look and stop fighting.

[rocket757]

In-in, a brand new boat, such a ka-a-aroshiy!
and a couple of torpedo tubes !!!
The border vessel ... to make a coast guard battleship out of it ??? what for?
Smugglers, poachers to drive ... not the cruisers, they swim.

[Altona]

Quote: Mar. Tira

A good ship. In my time one could dream of such a thing. And comfort, and weapons, and seaworthiness, correspond to the task.

----------------------------
Warships are not inferior to cruise yachts in terms of comfort and design, and this ship is a good example, it seems to be built with increased comfort. One thing I did not understand, does he have an ice class or not?

[rocket757]

Yes, not for comfort it can be loved by sailors / border guards, for a good move, the reliability of systems and weapons !!!
For comfort, they will say thanks. but if the rest is missing .... you know

[den.perfiljew]

A beautiful device, anyway! more to such!

[Radical]

Quote: 79807420129

Quote: Scoun

is a modern patrol ship, which embodies the most modern achievements of domestic science and technology ”

Here is some performance characteristics

A ship of rank 2, and the armament is like that of a boat, except perhaps a helicopter, and then it will either be or not.