Military Review

“Deadly trick” for Moscow: new details of the “Fast Global Strike”. How not to step on the same rake?

77



The end of the previous week was remembered by the impressive turmoil among the Russian mass media, who were greatly impressed by the data on the launch of the US Department of Defense’s program for developing complexes that are in line with the concept of the Fast Global Impact (BSU). Despite the fact that the active phase of the design and development of supersonic and hypersonic means of delivery of high-precision weaponsAccording to the representative of the Ministry of Defense of Russia Alexander Emelyanov, it began only recently, individual projects have been carried out by the American defense giants for more than 8 years. These include intercontinental ballistic missiles with monoblock and multiblock non-nuclear "equipment", which are individual-purpose maneuvering BBs with advanced missile defense systems (strategic types of BSU), as well as tactical supersonic or hypersonic anti-ship / multipurpose long-range anti-ship missiles.

The latter, in turn, can be divided into 2 subtypes: the X-51 “X-174“ Waverider ”, etc., as well as the long-range RIM-6 ERAM attack missile long-range missiles (as is well known, Raytheon "Is actively working on high-speed anti-ship modification SM-72). A separate class is the concept of a hypersonic reconnaissance-strike high-altitude aircraft from Lockheed Martin SR-40, which, according to the idea of ​​the developer and representatives of the Air Force, in addition to intelligence from 45 - 6 km, can strike at targets with high-precision XNUMX-flywheel elements of high-precision weapons with ultra low reflective surface.

If we argue objectively, there is nothing supernatural for a knowledgeable in military technology and geostrategic redistribution of man in this information. Nevertheless, all signs of panic appeared in the information resources and forums caused by a loud publication titled “Global strike: the United States will destroy Russia in 60 minutes”. For a person who is ignorant and suspicious, such material can result in real stress. Apparently, this name was caused by a statement by Alexander Emelyanov, made on the margins of the 1 Committee of the UN General Assembly, where a high-ranking representative of the Defense Ministry noted the fact that the Pentagon intentionally accelerated the rate of output of BSU funds to the level of operational alertness regional missile defense as soon as possible. After all, the alleged retaliatory strike of the Russian and Chinese Strategic Missile Forces after the “star raid” of the BSU state facilities should be much weaker than the pre-emptive one. Theoretically, the opinion of the Russian military representative quite correctly reflects the whole essence of the actions of the Americans; but the hysteria of the press, some representatives of which have very little understanding of the current deployment of air defense systems of the VKS at the European theater of operations, knows no limits and sometimes borders on marasmus.

First, it should be noted that even today, the US Naval and Air Forces are technically absolutely incapable of delivering a “disarming” strike on all strategically important military facilities of the Russian Armed Forces, especially with the use of non-nuclear ICBM or SLBM warheads . It is impossible for such reasons as:

- excellent mobility and stealth movable ground strategic missile systems type PT 2PM "Poplar» (36 units with 36 warheads.) PT 2PM2 "Topol-M» (18 units with 18BB.), MS-24 "Yars" (82 PU with multiunit 15IX55M ICBMs equipped with 336 self-guided combat units), which does not allow the American BSU hypersonic elements to provide adequate accuracy of the circular deflection, because for detecting and “capturing” a mobile ground unit, the combat stage must have active radar an on-line homing head that cannot work effectively in the low stratosphere and troposphere because of the resulting plasma “cocoon” at a speed near 12-15М;

- the impossibility of radar direction finding of ground PGRK through strategic high-altitude reconnaissance RQ-4A / B and promising SR-72 due to the presence of the most powerful anti-aircraft / anti-missile zones of access and maneuver of A2 / AD in the aerospace space above the central Russia, The Urals and the southern part of Siberia (in previous works, we considered that the SR-72 has the ability to pass over the upper lines of interception only the C-300PS / PM1 and С-300В ЗРК; similar “fad” with С-XN UMXB300 will not work thanks to the promising ZUR 4M9MB);

- the highest speed limits on intercepted targets, both for C-300B4 and C-400 anti-aircraft missile systems (16500 - 17300 km / h), and for C-300ПМ1 (11000 km / h), which do not allow to operate with such sound systems that do not allow such sound systems, which do not allow to operate with such hypers and X-NUMX (51 km / h), which do not allow to operate with such sound systems, which do not allow to operate with such sound systems, which do not allow to operate with such hypers and X-NUMX (2 km / h), which do not allow to operate with such sound systems that do not allow to operate with such hypers and X-NUMX 55 (6 km / h), which do not allow to operate with such sound systems that do not allow to operate with such hypers and X-NUMX 500 (2 km / h). as X-19 "Waverider", and in the future similar to the HTV-25 "Falcon" (the new anti-aircraft missile system 30Р77М / С-6 "Triumphator-M" will finally nullify any opportunities to break into our air sectors A7 / AD XNUMX- XNUMX-flywheel hypersonic elements that are combat equipment ICBM LGM-XNUMXG "Mibuteman-III", these abilities will provide super-distance A new exoatmospheric interceptor with the index XNUMXНXNUMX capable of hitting a target at a speed of more than XNUMX km / s;

- the regular arrival in service of the Radiotechnical Forces of the HKS of Russia unique in the world practice of interspecific multiband radar complexes “Nebo-M”, represented by three radar modules of meter, decimeter and centimeter ranges (RLM-M, RLM-D and RLM-CE, respectively); the detection range of a target with 0,1 m2 EPR in the sector mode is for the 200 complex km (under interference conditions) and around 300 - 320 km (without intensive radioactivity); instrumental range for large objects reaches 1800 km; the height of detection for large targets of the type BR can reach 1200 km, for small targets it depends on the EPR and elevation position.


In fact, we have a powerful RLC capable of quickly transferring to the most missile-dangerous operational directions as a missile attack warning system (EWS) and transmit target designation to the automated control systems of anti-aircraft missile brigades such as Polyana-D4M1 or Baikal. . Stationary high-potential radars of the intermediate-purpose missile systems of the Voronezh-M / DM / SM type have a significant drawback in terms of work on the means of the Fast Global Impact based on hypersonic direct-flow aerials. The trajectory of the latter passes at an altitude of 45-50 km, which is why the radio horizon limit is about 950 km, and therefore even the existing number of Voronezh is not able to cover all the “blind” aerospace parts of the Russian Federation in Siberia and Chukotka. The four-element mobile complex 55Ж6М “Sky-M”, which can turn around in a quarter of an hour, successfully compensates for this drawback.


The automated control system of the 9C52М1 mixed anti-aircraft brigade "Polyana-D4M1" is a unique product of network-centric opposition in an aerospace theater. High-performance A-50 computers, as well as automated workstations of operators with wide-format MFIs built on the basis of modern components, make it possible to obtain and analyze a vast amount of tactical information about the air situation from several sources simultaneously (from AWACS A-50U and the Nebo-M RCL to low-altitude “Plyot-K” LLW and “Opponnik-G” surveillance radars). Information is received via secure multi-frequency radio communication channels with frequency hopping mode. The processed information (with the priority distribution of 250 targets) is transmitted to the PBUs of various types of air defense systems of the ground forces and video conferencing


From the above it becomes clear that forcing a situation with the help of the headlines “about the destruction of Russia in 1 hour” is pure panic, having little in common with the actual situation. Pay attention should be completely on another detail. Announcing a large-scale program for the development of BSU complexes by several American aerospace leaders, the Pentagon again openly pushes the Russian Federation into an arms race of unprecedented scale, which is quite capable of creating very, very much trouble for our economy. It is for this reason that in no case can we miscalculate with the countermeasures being taken. In particular, the allocation of colossal funds for the development of many similar means of air attack will automatically lead to a reduction in funding for programs such as PAK FA, PAK DA and PAK DP. And here with us, and so it was all written in the water with a pitchfork!

While the Americans put more than 170 F-22A, 105 F-35A, 50 F-35B and 25 F-35C on the wing, we only carry out 9 1 and 2 samples of the 41-th stages and continue to test with the old TRDDF AL1F117 (“50 product”). Moreover, as noted earlier, for the T-57 (Su-35) and Su-9C, a promising ultra-long-range air attack missile RVV-AE-PD with an integrated rocket-ramjet engine with high power in the final segment of the trajectory and due maneuverability (after all, a low-maneuverable heavy RVV-BD is not able to cope with modern "helicopter" aircraft and fighters maneuvering with 120-multiple overloads). In the American and European Air Forces, the long-awaited AIM-XNUMXD URVB units and the Meteor MBDA have successfully coped with such tasks.

Focusing on the development and introduction of precisely these types of weapons, there remains a chance of establishing domination over NATO’s long-term military capabilities. As for the fight against air attack of the Belarusian State University, there is nothing better for this task than developing and bringing to mind the project of the Advanced Airborne Interception Complex (MiG-41). Even today's modernized offspring of the RAC "MiG" - the MiG-31BM interceptor has an immense potential to destroy enemy high-altitude hypersonic objects operating at speeds up to 6400 km / h, which the machine owes to the P-37 ultra-long-range missiles and the onboard radar system " Zaslon-AM ”on the basis of PPAR, transmitting radar data to the higher-performance core“ Baguette-55 ”.

The project of the PAK DP, which is planned to be transferred to the VKS by 2026, should become the embodiment of high-altitude interceptors of the 21st century. The estimated speed of the MiG-41 closely approaches the lower boundary of the hypersonic (about 4,3М) with a practical ceiling of about 32 - 38 km. The new interceptor missiles for the advanced MiG are currently unknown, but it can be said with certainty that their flight speed will be at the level of “fresh” 9М82МВ SAM for C-300B4 (2600 m / s) ammunition The controls will present the gas-dynamic "belts" of the transverse control engines in the center of mass of the rocket and its tail for maneuvering in the upper stratosphere and mesosphere. This will allow the PAK DA project to fully comply with the capabilities of the enemy’s high-precision weapons at the beginning of the new millennium. As for the promising hypersonic types of weapons, there is absolutely no point in trying to merge tens of billions of rubles into them, trying to keep pace with the tricky American plan, because we will get all the chances to lose the weapons necessary for superiority in high-intensity conflicts. local value.

Information sources:
https://svpressa.ru/war21/article/183498/
http://bastion-karpenko.ru/S-300v4/
http://www.arms-expo.ru/armament/samples/1091/59254/
https://tvzvezda.ru/news/forces/content/201601220803-pcva.htm
http://www.airwar.ru/enc/fighter/mig31bm.html
Author:
77 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Esoteric
    Esoteric 16 October 2017 07: 00 New
    +6
    How not to step on the same rake?

    You have to look where you put your legs. Open your eyes so that you can see who you are against. Books to read about the memories of all sorts of who tried to go to Russia ...
    1. NIKNN
      NIKNN 16 October 2017 12: 35 New
      12
      Quote: Esoteric
      You have to look where you put your legs. Eyes open

      I have an opinion that it is necessary to send information to the press about the successful test of America’s weapon that selectively destroys the "elite" and parliamentarians in the Duma ... Ido they are like parasites and they don’t need the word at all (they have enough of their own), but the population is not normal touches, sort of useful ... winked
      1. Navigator Basov
        Navigator Basov 16 October 2017 18: 28 New
        +3
        Oh, Colonel ... History doesn’t teach you anything. In 1941, too, the higher race “selectively” destroyed commissars and Jews, and people like you were registered with the police and waited: oh, now with their help, we will selectively drive out the elite from the normal population, and let us live like in enlightened Europe! A shame on your gray hair!
        1. NIKNN
          NIKNN 16 October 2017 19: 14 New
          +2
          Quote: Bass Navigator
          let us live as in enlightened Europe!

          Even better ... :)))
          1. Navigator Basov
            Navigator Basov 17 October 2017 21: 05 New
            +3
            Quote: NIKNN
            Even better ... :)))
            It is necessary to write: more better. And then you’ll live as 95% of the population.
    2. 34 region
      34 region 16 October 2017 14: 29 New
      11
      07.00. Esoteric! Oh well! Again the same rake about a sword !? And when did you come with jeans, cola and chewing gum !? Who died from such a sword? No need to prepare for past wars. We must prepare for the wars of today and tomorrow! And when they came with the color revolutions, who died from them? And who died from ISIS?
      1. Armata
        Armata 16 October 2017 17: 09 New
        +4
        Quote: 34 region
        07.00. Esoteric! Oh well! Again the same rake about a sword !? And when did you come with jeans, cola and chewing gum !? Who died from such a sword? No need to prepare for past wars. We must prepare for the wars of today and tomorrow! And when they came with the color revolutions, who died from them? And who died from ISIS?

        It was necessary and how it was to be prepared, a simple example, a male toolmaker with more than 30 experience brought his grandson’s spiner today and says: “Damn, reanimate the bearing. He went swimming with him yesterday in the bathtub”. And how is this different from chewing gum and cola? Brains are at the same level.
  2. Uncle lee
    Uncle lee 16 October 2017 07: 10 New
    16
    If tomorrow is war, if the enemy attacks,
    If the dark force comes, -
    As one person, the whole Soviet people
    He will stand up for a free Motherland.

    Chorus:

    On earth, in the heavens and the sea
    Our refrain is both powerful and severe:
    If tomorrow is war
    If the hike is tomorrow, -
    Be ready for the trip today!

    If tomorrow is war, the country will stir
    From Kronstadt to Vladivostok.
    The country will be stirred up, great and strong,
    And we will cruelly break the enemy.
    1. aszzz888
      aszzz888 16 October 2017 07: 20 New
      +8
      ... in the last century, almost the whole country sang this song ...
    2. tracer
      tracer 16 October 2017 13: 20 New
      +2
      Have you been to a doctor for a long time? Psychiatrist mean ?.
      Do you sing karaoke in the text? There are other sites for this.
      1. Uncle lee
        Uncle lee 16 October 2017 13: 28 New
        13
        Quote: tracer
        Have you been to a doctor for a long time?

        We live in Kanatchikova’s cottage, the doctor is always with us. And we sing in chorus three times a day! And when we leave, I recommend you hide away, otherwise we are violent people and we have help!
    3. Sverdlov
      Sverdlov 17 October 2017 02: 02 New
      0
      Not those times and the country is not that ...
  3. aszzz888
    aszzz888 16 October 2017 07: 19 New
    10
    The Pentagon is again openly pushing the Russian Federation to an arms race of unprecedented proportions, which is quite capable of creating very, very many troubles for our economy.

    ... a campaign this is one of the main goals of the mericatos - to draw us into the next "race" ... angry
    1. Alaskatzegavan
      Alaskatzegavan 16 October 2017 18: 04 New
      0
      Do not go to a fortuneteller
    2. Awak
      Awak 16 October 2017 19: 30 New
      0
      SOI 2.0 and rubbing your vassals, another portion of sedative. Like - buy our money, they are provided with our bang-bang.
  4. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 16 October 2017 07: 23 New
    +6
    Last week, the United States discussed the topic of the “Global Impact” at least a couple of times. Therefore, no comment on the article.
  5. ADmA_RUS
    ADmA_RUS 16 October 2017 08: 05 New
    +6
    In the article. We started for health, but finished for peace. Author, please show unmanned aerial vehicles or a pilot (and at the same time a fighter) who can perform a maneuver of evading two or more missiles with overloads of 9 or more G.
    1. Vadim237
      Vadim237 16 October 2017 09: 33 New
      +1
      By 2030, such UAVs will appear, the United States already has the X 37 spaceship, which can easily be launched into the series as an orbital bomber, against which the C 300 and C 400 are useless.
      1. Rus2012
        Rus2012 16 October 2017 10: 32 New
        +3
        Quote: Vadim237
        With 300 and With 400 are useless.

        ... from which member of your armada of spaceships?
        2018 will go into service with the 500, which takes the spacecraft from the heights of 200km
        And there will be A-235 ...
        1. 34 region
          34 region 16 October 2017 14: 36 New
          +1
          10.32. Rus! Judging by how the Israelis calmly bomb the Syrians, all sorts of S-hundredths are just a bluff. And all of our S-hundredths turns out to be absolutely powerless against Israeli aviation. Here is the alignment obtained by real events. From our S-hundredths, not a single enemy aircraft was injured, and nowhere is our advertised S-hundredth used. And the question is. And our XNUMXth myth or reality? Judging by the events, the myth.
          1. badens1111
            badens1111 16 October 2017 14: 40 New
            +4
            Quote: 34 region
            And all of our S-hundredths turns out to be absolutely powerless against Israeli aviation. Here is the alignment obtained by real events. From our S-hundredths, not a single enemy aircraft was injured, and nowhere is our advertised S-hundredth used. And the question is. And our XNUMXth myth or reality?

            What is your cry?
            Is Russia in a state of war with the same Israel, the USA? No? Well, when we do, then we'll see what's what, but for now, yelling that our facilities are bad is silly.
            1. 34 region
              34 region 16 October 2017 14: 50 New
              +2
              14.40. Baden Syrians are kind of like our allies (or Russia is their ally). Why then are we not able to protect our ally? Or are we in share with Israel? Or is Israel our ally? What is going on in the Oblonsky house? Do we defend or substitute the Syrians? Judging by the Israeli raids, we surrender. It turns out that Assad was fooled literally. They put him inflatable C-hundredths. In reality, our S-XNUMXth virtual product of our virtual defense industry? So is our virtual support policy? So we play for the US team?
              1. badens1111
                badens1111 16 October 2017 14: 52 New
                0
                Quote: 34 region
                So we play for the US team?

                No
                Come here, read ..
                badens1111 6 Today, 14:42 PM | Israeli aviation destroyed the Syrian S-200 air defense system
                1. 34 region
                  34 region 16 October 2017 14: 55 New
                  +1
                  14.52. Baden So I write for this news too! We somehow have all the news against our S-hundredths. They do not show themselves in battle.
                  1. Kachesgm
                    Kachesgm 16 October 2017 17: 05 New
                    +2
                    The whole problem is that the Israelis did not launch rockets from Syria. Accordingly, a plane cannot be shot down in advance without declaring war, but why nothing intercepts missiles is already a question for air defense personnel.
                  2. Cynic
                    Cynic 16 October 2017 17: 14 New
                    +1
                    Quote: 34 region
                    They do not show themselves in battle.

                    Please name the case when the S-300th did not work?
              2. Gennady Fyodorov
                Gennady Fyodorov 16 October 2017 17: 11 New
                +4
                This is the most interesting question, who is an ally to whom ?! For Vova with Dimon, Israel is the homeland of their ancestors, and in no case can it be an enemy. They will surrender Assad, like Saddam, as soon as possible, and Israel will not only regularly indicate its presence in the theater of war, but at the right time for it, it will occupy not only the Golan Heights, but also as many oil fields as it wants. For this, the whole Syrian scam was started. Russia, as always, will not receive anything. He will fight and leave home, both from Germany, Poland and Afghanistan.
              3. Alikos
                Alikos 16 October 2017 17: 40 New
                +3
                Quote: 34 region
                Why then are we not able to protect our ally? Or are we in share with Israel? Or is Israel our ally? H

                Well, you are like a little Volgograd ...
                Why does Moscow not protect Syria from Israel? Yes, because Moscow is the 2nd Israel, and in the government the vast majority of Jews ...
                What are you talking about?
            2. Boa kaa
              Boa kaa 16 October 2017 19: 53 New
              +4
              Quote: badens1111
              Well, when we are, then we'll see what's what, but for now

              The states put the wrong horse ... If they start with conventional weapons, even high-precision ones, they will not be able to achieve their goals in 60 minutes.
              But the answer will definitely fly vigorous ... Even if they transmit all the ICBM ICBMs, they will never succeed with the boats ... Well, the "Perimeter" doesn’t sleep at night ...
              So, little by little no one will succeed. UK will also receive for the company ... The rest * selected * and * exclusive * will die from radiation sickness, after meeting with "Status-6", or from Yollustone's lava ...
              So, amam needs to think hard about his "dance floor" with a rake.
              IMHO.
              1. badens1111
                badens1111 16 October 2017 20: 08 New
                0
                Quote: BoA KAA
                So, amam needs to think hard about his "dance floor" with a rake.

                I totally agree.
          2. Cynic
            Cynic 16 October 2017 17: 11 New
            0
            In such cases, they say, learn the Svidomo materiel.
        2. a.sirin
          a.sirin 16 October 2017 14: 49 New
          +3
          "... Hooray! Hooray! Everyone shouted swabs here
          Hooray! Hooray! ... And they fell.
          Tuba -riba-se ...
          ... But none of them died - they all escaped
          All of them suddenly won and climbed up ... "
          L. Cassille. Swamp
      2. ADmA_RUS
        ADmA_RUS 16 October 2017 11: 26 New
        +3
        The author is already panicking. Although there are no models of such devices yet.
        About. x-37. This hope was banter? He flew several times, with an unknown target and result. And it has, at best, a miserable 900 kg of payload and a sunroof with TOP. How many bomb-bombers from above do you know?
        1. Arikkhab
          Arikkhab 16 October 2017 13: 33 New
          +1
          Well, in zero gravity, it seems like it doesn’t matter which side the hatch is ... another question is how much the orbiting and how often you can launch
          1. ADmA_RUS
            ADmA_RUS 16 October 2017 14: 52 New
            +3
            If released in zero gravity, then by definition it is not a bomber, but a missile carrier. But these are trifles. From space, it is faster and much cheaper to withdraw warheads with a conventional rocket.
        2. 34 region
          34 region 16 October 2017 14: 38 New
          +1
          11.26. And if you twist the device? Or is it not spinning? But on the ground it is probably convenient to load from above.
          1. ADmA_RUS
            ADmA_RUS 16 October 2017 14: 53 New
            0
            From zero gravity a bomb cannot be dropped. And in the atmosphere at hypersonic speeds, if it rolls over it will burn to hell. He has basic thermal protection on the face and bottom.
            1. 34 region
              34 region 16 October 2017 14: 58 New
              0
              14.53. Sensible answer. And if you roll over and give acceleration with a squib? Are stupid people sitting there and designing?
              1. ADmA_RUS
                ADmA_RUS 16 October 2017 17: 57 New
                +4
                1. So u on hyper sound. It is necessary that the bomb would fly out of the bomb-gate and not heap the tail of the x-37. The question is, what acceleration must be given so that the bomb can fly out so far that turbulence from the carrier does not destroy it and does not disrupt its orientation? And will the body withstand such an effort?
                2. At high altitudes and speeds, serious thermal protection will have to be hung on the bomb, which will increase its weight, dimensions, visibility and complicate control in the atmosphere. That is, we get a conventional warhead for ICBMs. But then why the heck to fence a garden with x-37?
                1. Vadim237
                  Vadim237 16 October 2017 21: 24 New
                  0
                  Why create something new, warheads are already there - three of these in the cargo compartment will fit perfectly.
                  1. ADmA_RUS
                    ADmA_RUS 17 October 2017 07: 20 New
                    0
                    And why the x-37 if it is already the Minutemen?
                    1. Vadim237
                      Vadim237 17 October 2017 09: 20 New
                      +1
                      For a quick global nuclear strike - ICBMs still need to take off, and these devices will be in orbit for several years.
                      1. ADmA_RUS
                        ADmA_RUS 25 October 2017 06: 53 New
                        0
                        And who is stopping the satellite into orbit from the farm in which to place warheads?
                2. Vadim237
                  Vadim237 16 October 2017 21: 40 New
                  0
                  The bomb on top of the apparatus is a vacuum at an altitude of 200 kilometers, then the flight of warheads by inertia.
      3. andj61
        andj61 16 October 2017 13: 11 New
        +3
        Quote: Vadim237
        By 2030, such UAVs will appear, the United States already has the X 37 spaceship, which can easily be launched into the series as an orbital bomber, against which the C 300 and C 400 are useless.

        Easy to launch as a very light bomber with a payload weight of just 900 kg. And what can he launch serious? Given the cost of putting the device itself into orbit, the game is not worth the candle - it's easier to launch a rocket right away. Moreover, the use of such an apparatus is possible only AFTER the outbreak of war. And then there’s the question - will he be allowed to take off after the outbreak of war ... If, by your principle, it’s easier to immediately launch the orbital platform with nuclear missiles on the principle of the Almaz station (Salyut), but in the original version, that is, with nuclear rockets. However, at present, the deployment of nuclear weapons in space is prohibited ...
        1. Vadim237
          Vadim237 16 October 2017 21: 34 New
          +1
          Given the cost of launching the device itself - Mask to help them, ten such vehicles in orbit will be enough, with 30 warheads the reaction time is several minutes - the SPRN will not have time to warn, the last record for the duration of the flight is 718 days - the combat duty of such vehicles in the future to make 5 years in a high-energy orbit - a team will arrive, they will go down to the NOU and drop their warheads. And for the United States, the word "forbidden" is conditional.
          1. ADmA_RUS
            ADmA_RUS 17 October 2017 07: 22 New
            +1
            Mdya To school. Learn arithmetic.
            1. Vadim237
              Vadim237 17 October 2017 09: 23 New
              0
              Learn for yourself. And the United States if they want to build and launch into orbit, and no matter how much it will cost.
        2. Vadim237
          Vadim237 16 October 2017 21: 45 New
          +1
          Given the state of our cosmonautics, we will not have to talk about any orbital stations in the next ten years.
          1. ADmA_RUS
            ADmA_RUS 17 October 2017 07: 23 New
            0
            What is wrong with her?
      4. Arikkhab
        Arikkhab 16 October 2017 13: 31 New
        +1
        One problem is how to launch these “orbital bombers” into orbit in such numbers? and surely we have an "asymmetric answer"
  6. Olgovich
    Olgovich 16 October 2017 08: 41 New
    +6
    The author did not mention another important detail: the possibility of creating many cheap FALSE targets for hypersonic missiles in the vast territory of Russia.
    In addition, there are Russian means of electronic warfare, recognized by the amers themselves as very good.
    1. ZVO
      ZVO 16 October 2017 10: 15 New
      +2
      Quote: Olgovich
      The author did not mention another important detail: the possibility of creating many cheap FALSE targets for hypersonic missiles in the vast territory of Russia.
      In addition, there are Russian means of electronic warfare, recognized by the amers themselves as very good.


      What is a false goal in your understanding?
      In modern conditions?
      We are not talking about an inflatable tank, we are talking about strategic nuclear forces.

      An imitation of the activity of a regiment of the Strategic Missile Forces or SSBNs with SLBMs?
      Will we build submarine bases and mines?
      Will we build false SSBNs and hundreds of false PUs?
      We will imitate their full service? Otherwise they will not believe.

      And in general - this is unlikely to succeed - because under the agreements - all bases and launchers - are fixed in general documents and declassified.
      1. the same doctor
        the same doctor 16 October 2017 14: 24 New
        +4
        I will try to answer for the author of the comment. First of all, in order to have false goals, it is necessary to stop inspections under the SALT agreements. After that, we will be able to build the ICBM mines discreetly and have a dozen empty imitations of headbands on one mine with a missile.
        .
        Secondly, for BZHRK false targets are all similar trains.
        .
        Thirdly, if you hide gauges and other missiles in containers, which again prohibits the INF Treaty, all trucks on our roads will become false targets.
        .
        If a promising interceptor starts with a monoblock ICBM under the belly, then all interceptors and all their airfields will be false targets.
        .
        And so on.
  7. rruvim
    rruvim 16 October 2017 10: 23 New
    +2
    SAM 9M82MV, as far as is known. did not pass the test cycle due to design flaws. And this is 50% of the argumentation of this article. And whatever you call the 300th: at least the 400th, at least the “Five-hundredth Triumph”, without this SAM, it will still remain 300th, albeit with LCD displays and a “digit”. Regarding the A-50U AWACS planes: how many are in service? Three pieces? How much time do they need to take off from under Ivanovo? I think this airdrome is one of the first targets for GBU. And something around no C300-B4 complexes was found. In any case, the guys from the forum of East Kazakhstan region.
  8. rruvim
    rruvim 16 October 2017 10: 42 New
    +3
    In the foreseeable future, the United States will be able to implement BSU. At first, of course, they will be trained in some kind of country - “Outcast”. The question is: if this blow is dealt to us, will our political leadership be able to decide on the use of nuclear munitions remaining after the GBU against the United States? Hardly. Losing military facilities is one thing, and the source of profit (the "answer" will be disastrous) is another.
  9. zzdimk
    zzdimk 16 October 2017 13: 26 New
    0
    It's okay: someday this deadly machine (rake) will miss.
  10. the same doctor
    the same doctor 16 October 2017 14: 17 New
    +4
    they again try to separate us into military expenses, as in the days of Reagan. I must admit that we can NEVER! even defend against forty-year-old minuten, not to mention the means of BSU. You can make hundreds of thousands of missile defense missiles, ruin the country, but there will be no sense. And you can withdraw from the SALT agreements and place a couple of thousand ICBMs on disguised sites and mobile carriers surrounded by tens of thousands of false targets. And you don’t have to cover Kamchatka, you don’t need a continuous radar field ... And missile defense and air defense systems should be developed only in volumes sufficient for local conflicts.
    1. Kachesgm
      Kachesgm 16 October 2017 17: 10 New
      +2
      I always thought, and if you place an underground nuclear charge of sufficient power for tectonic shifts of a planetary scale. And to declare - there will be us, there will not be this planet ....
      1. Elevator
        Elevator in the building 16 October 2017 22: 43 New
        +1
        probably even blows to the coal basins are included in the plan of the return to aliens and striped. After all, there are enough points of application for nuclear weapons, as well as other "biochemical surprises," the question is simple and complex - will such a guide go ..
    2. rruvim
      rruvim 16 October 2017 17: 15 New
      +2
      Therefore, it is necessary to prepare the Army for a conventional war. And so that there wouldn’t be a war - to finance Russia Today. A very good tool, sobering white farmers in the outback of America, and they are all there with machine guns ...
  11. lady.endzhi
    lady.endzhi 16 October 2017 17: 14 New
    0
    Thank. Everything is very clear and intelligibly written.
    1. rruvim
      rruvim 16 October 2017 17: 19 New
      0
      What is intelligible? HALF OF THE LISTED MEANS OF REFLECTION OF GBU in this article is not even in the form of drawings either on paper or in CAD ...
  12. Mikhail Zubkov
    Mikhail Zubkov 16 October 2017 17: 19 New
    +1
    Quote: tracer
    Have you been to a doctor for a long time?

    We will return our Alaska and continue to slaughter the Americans through Canada - it will also be useful to us as still a colony of British hare! We have 40 icebreakers in the Arctic, and these atlant framers have not one in fact! Only half a hundred anti-ballistic missiles were scraped over the entire "North Atlantic" adder, three times behind our missile defense system, and against our 300 attacking strategic missiles - in general, one symbolism and a bluff!
    1. ZVO
      ZVO 17 October 2017 15: 46 New
      0
      Quote: Mikhail Zubkov
      Quote: tracer
      Have you been to a doctor for a long time?

      We will return our Alaska and continue to slaughter the Americans through Canada - it will also be useful to us as still a colony of British hare! We have 40 icebreakers in the Arctic, and these atlant framers have not one in fact! Only half a hundred anti-ballistic missiles were scraped over the entire "North Atlantic" adder, three times behind our missile defense system, and against our 300 attacking strategic missiles - in general, one symbolism and a bluff!


      Ola la, what room do you live in?
  13. rruvim
    rruvim 16 October 2017 17: 29 New
    +2
    The article again about the R-37. But it doesn’t hit the target without its “highlight” (it is necessary that the MIG-31 hangs for 20 km until it captures the target from its “semi-active GOS, and 200-300 km. Of its flight, how long does the MIG have to to drag her behind with her Radar Barrier? They will knock down several times ... ". And her" active "modification has not yet passed the State Test.
    1. Viktor Petrov
      Viktor Petrov 16 October 2017 19: 45 New
      +1
      The KS-172 super-long range air-to-air missile, a two-stage missile capable of developing hypersonic speed, uses an active radar seeker, a range of 400 km is probably a sufficient range so that the AWACS and REP aircraft, flying command posts and strategic bombers stay away. -31 is often used as an AWACS aircraft, so others, such as the SU-35, will probably drag along.
      1. ZVO
        ZVO 18 October 2017 18: 35 New
        0
        Quote: Victor Petrov
        Super-long range air-to-air missile KS-172.


        such a missile in the form of real combat models in service - does not exist.
        And will not be.
        1. Viktor Petrov
          Viktor Petrov 18 October 2017 21: 37 New
          0
          For the MiG-31 two missiles were created, new with the K-37 370 km GVS and RVV-BD with 200 km taken into service in 2014, you provide data on the rocket (R-37), which has already been discontinued a hundred years ago)
          1. ZVO
            ZVO 19 October 2017 07: 42 New
            0
            Quote: Victor Petrov
            RVV-DB

            I wrote about the K-172 that you specified. And no other way.

            About K-37 - it was not put into service. Generally. She did not pass further tests.
            RVV-DB - not adopted in 2014.

            In August 2015 - they only “finished it” .. Accordingly, they could not produce it.

            August 26, 2015. New missiles will be manufactured entirely from domestic components, and in the coming years will appear in combat units of the Russian Air Force.

            “We have already delivered a medium-range missile, RVV-SD, to the series,” said Boris Obnosov, head of the KTRV. “This year, a short-range missile is launched into the series, on which it was necessary to solve more issues of import substitution, as well as the RVV-DB, long-range missile.”

            These are the words of the end of 2015. accordingly, about any RVV-DB in combat formation in 2014. as you wrote - there can be no question.
            1. Viktor Petrov
              Viktor Petrov 19 October 2017 12: 55 New
              0
              Yes, events in Ukraine were discarded in terms of the production of a certain range of weapons, now there seems to be no problem with this.
  14. nikvic46
    nikvic46 16 October 2017 17: 37 New
    0
    All the technique indicated by the author inspires hope that there will be no war. Both American equipment and ours have crashes.
    Therefore, the task of Russia is to bring all of its military equipment into such a state that it works like a watch under any conditions. To do this, conduct exercises without an announcement. The commander opened the package and launched a missile for a given target.
    the "enemy" coordinates must eliminate it. All this is theory. The enemy must know what to prepare an attack, what is fraught with
    heavy losses, although I am convinced that in a big war there will be no winners.
  15. Forest
    Forest 16 October 2017 19: 24 New
    0
    Does anyone know that at least in the project we have any missiles that can compare with the NATO 70's?
    1. myobius59
      myobius59 16 October 2017 20: 47 New
      0
      Of course there is. Type Rocket for each shket.
  16. myobius59
    myobius59 16 October 2017 20: 40 New
    +1
    Quote: Bass Navigator
    Oh, Colonel ... History doesn’t teach you anything. In 1941, too, the higher race “selectively” destroyed commissars and Jews, and people like you were registered with the police and waited: oh, now with their help, we will selectively drive out the elite from the normal population, and let us live like in enlightened Europe! A shame on your gray hair!

    And what did you work as a clerk there, where did you write to the police?
  17. myobius59
    myobius59 16 October 2017 20: 46 New
    +1
    Quote: Alikos
    Quote: 34 region
    Why then are we not able to protect our ally? Or are we in share with Israel? Or is Israel our ally? H

    Well, you are like a little Volgograd ...
    Why does Moscow not protect Syria from Israel? Yes, because Moscow is the 2nd Israel, and in the government the vast majority of Jews ...
    What are you talking about?

    Finally, at least one smart person explained, “Why?” And then basically everyone says that Russia is not obligated to protect Syria (its war ally) from Israel. Like, this is a personal matter of Syria.
  18. bratchanin3
    bratchanin3 17 October 2017 09: 59 New
    0
    It is necessary to consider all these ratios; for this, people came up with computers, but for what purpose it is necessary to hammer brains, a shaking layman, I don’t understand with specific bookkeeping? Moreover, the Americans are bluffing again, in my opinion, as was the case with Reagan with SDI. Well, Americans will not risk their assets, even with a guarantee to win 100%, so that they would be left with nothing and, at best, deep in underground mines, without a sunny sandy beach and fresh sea air aboard snow-white yachts. If the Yankees were so cool, they would have gouged North Korea for a long time, but no, they are bargaining and doing it right - the Koreans are Joohe Hye, these are far from Vietnamese. You can’t hide from the Koreans behind a concrete fence.