US hopes for success of talks on NATO transit hub in Ulyanovsk

RIA News. The United States hopes for a successful discussion on the establishment of a NATO transit point in Ulyanovsk, said Victoria Nuland, a spokeswoman for the US State Department.

Earlier, the media reported that the Russian Federation is ready to sign with the North Atlantic Alliance an agreement on multimodal return transit of goods from Afghanistan, which will combine air and land transport of goods. According to this scheme, cargoes should be delivered by air from Afghanistan to the Russian Federation, bypassing Uzbekistan, while trains should be formed in Russia for further shipment of cargoes to NATO countries. The airfield in Ulyanovsk was considered as a transit point.

Last week, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said in the State Duma that the draft agreement on the establishment of a transit point in the Ulyanovsk region has not yet entered into force. And the Foreign Ministry said that the ministry, together with the competent Russian departments, had prepared proposals for creating the necessary regulatory framework for the possible launch of a combined transit scheme, and this issue is under consideration by the Russian government.

“Of course, it would be very good if we could conclude an agreement on the use of the hub (hub) in Ulyanovsk by member countries of the ISAF coalition. This would support our efforts to develop a network of routes for the supply of goods for use by ISAF and the Afghans to Afghanistan and back” - said Nuland at a briefing on Friday.

She refused to give any details about the progress of the negotiations and the details of creating a transit point.

"I can not talk about any details of the agreement, let's leave this discussion until the moment it appears. But I am sure it (the agreement) is being discussed," the state department official said.

Earlier, on March 21, Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov said in an interview with RIA Newsthat Russia will receive material compensation in exchange for the establishment of a NATO transit point in the Ulyanovsk region. According to the deputy minister, compensation payments for tariffs charged for transportation by rail are made constantly.

“The issue of creating a transshipment point in Ulyanovsk is not a matter of forming a base. The point is to open a logistics center there,” Ryabkov added. “The issue has been worked out, but is far from being resolved. That is, further discussions will take place here, including in government, on the establishment of a transit point. "

The Deputy Foreign Minister of the Russian Federation recalled that the cooperation of the Russian Federation with NATO on the transit of non-lethal goods through Russian territory from Afghanistan and into Afghanistan is carried out because Moscow considers important the tasks that the international forces are undertaking there to promote security.

Earlier, the governor of the Ulyanovsk region Sergey Morozov said in an interview with the media that he supported the idea of ​​creating a NATO transit point in Ulyanovsk, since this would lead to the creation of new jobs and the loading of the transport system.

Comments

[domokl]

That's because they rested .. The people are against, and the leadership is selling the country's prestige for a penny ... I don’t even want to discuss such a topic ..

[esaul]

Hi Sasha. I am surprised by such categorical statements on your part.

Quote: domokl

and leadership for a penny sells the prestige of the country

The majority gave Putin a credit of confidence and, saying this, we are thereby denying him confidence and denying him the ability to soberly assess all the pros and cons when considering this issue and make the best decision. You will not deny that this question will not pass unnoticed by him ...

[domokl]

Hi Valera! .. You wonder in vain ... A credit of trust does not mean permissiveness ... When such a decision is made, a smart ruler must take into account not only material benefits, but also moral ones ... I do not mean this site, but generally the opinion of the people. Is it really so difficult to calculate the reaction of people?
To shut up a mouth like me, it’s enough to hold a referendum at least in the Ulyanovsk Region .. And that’s all. After this referendum, we will jump with happiness and joy, because the people decided so ... And now it’s stupid to use a trust resource for such trifles as this transshipment point ..

[esaul]

Sasha, once again I want to draw your attention to the words ---------- Last week, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said in the State Duma that the draft agreement on the creation of a transshipment point in the Ulyanovsk region had not yet entered into force. And the Foreign Ministry reported that the ministry, together with the competent Russian departments, prepared proposals for creating the necessary regulatory framework for the possible launch of a combined transit scheme, and this issue is under consideration by the Russian government. ----------- and on mine

Quote: esaul

we thereby already deny him confidence and deny him the ability to soberly assess all the pros and cons when CONSIDERING this issue and make the best decision

[101]

These are not trifles. They are ready to blame others for betrayal. But they themselves are ready to get dirty. How then we will make excuses We will call ourselves weathercocks and laugh

[rate 60]

esaul you probably have the icon of Putin hanging in the corner and you pray for it from morning to evening. What else should pass Putin to open your eyes.

[esaul]

Quote: rait 60

esaul you probably have the icon of Putin hanging in the corner and you pray for it from morning to evening. What else should pass Putin to open your eyes.

"Don't make yourself an idol" is one of my principles. I am not going to explain to you about my support for Putin - I have done this more than once for the less spiteful and able to read. And the fact that you "... feel such a personal dislike ... that you can’t bite" is a problem for you, colleague

[Sniper 1968]

rait 60,

Quote: rait 60

. What else should Putin pass?

You are ahead of the events. Lavrov said clearly: the issue has not been resolved. On May 7, 2012, there will be a new Supreme Command in Russia. He will think about how to make it difficult for a well-known gop-company to escape from Afgan. We will wait for the inauguration. And what kind of "icon" hangs near secret? By all accounts, Marilyn Manson.

[starshina78]

Putin has a phenomenal gift - he does not see the obvious! Also, he will not see that the majority of the country's inhabitants are against this base. Somewhere, sometime at some briefing or press conference after the signing of an agreement on this base, when asked about the indignation of the people against this base, he will once again make a surprised face and say: "I did not know! I will tell my assistants, so that they check! "Really all those who chose Putin do not see the obvious, he talks a lot and promises, but he fulfills practically nothing. To show off in front of a TV camera, to reprimand an official in public, kiss a dog (tiger, whale, etc.), fly to SS - 27, go to sea on the nuclear submarine, or some other PR event, then it is easy for him, but concrete deeds are not his strong point. We argue a lot and say that buying foreign weapons is not good and we blame Serdyukov and Makarov for this, and that Putin is not aware of what his minister and chief of staff are doing, but this is not his initiative. "Mistrals" - to support a friend of the President of France, so that he would not be torn apart by shipbuilders because of unemployment, and armored cars "Iveco" are a gift to Berlusconi's friend and companion, because they are not bought anywhere else after they got fucked up in Afghanistan. So, do not expect from Putin what he will never do!

[askort154]

I just do not understand the motives of the opponents of the hub port in Ulyanovsk. Type - an honor
countries, NATO base, betrayal, etc. If you follow this logic, then
it is necessary to ban the countries - members of NATO (their20) to use in Russia:
- airways
- international airports,
- sea and river ports,
- railway transportation,
- buy gas and oil,
- build assembly plants,
- tourism
- Russian compartment on the ISS, etc.
Long live North Korea!
I am a patriot to the bone marrow, but I don’t see any “betrayal” in Ulyanovsk. On the contrary, in addition to money and jobs, we will throw a good collar on NATO (especially the United States).

[Igarr]

Oshinichek ... Russia will cast upon itself.

If a person sits down to play cards with cheaters ... he makes only one mistake - sits down to play.

Russia has no reason to play with international cheaters.

For these Usafovtsev ... the path through Pakistan is open. Use it.
Do not go to hell with Russia.

And, on the other hand, I already see that the issue has been resolved. The base will be. We, once again - were fooled.
Ok, I see. To me.

[bob]

definitely against. Well this is a shame for the country. climbed into Afghanistan let them themselves and get out.

[vladim.gorbunow]

And where is Afghanistan? Case in Iran. North direction.

[Ruslan]

Quote: domokl

leadership for a penny the country's prestige sells.

<I'm afraid not only prestige, but most likely we are talking about the building of the whole country

[YARY]

On this they hope to cause apathy. fatigue from disputes, and then you can get into the country!

[domokl]

There is no apathy ... There is another anger ... and this is much worse ...

[Churchill]

This is a split! And you won’t spread the split with any money! ..

[Tiberium]

Maybe our politicians will wake up common sense, and they will still say no to the amers.

[Tatanka Yotanka]

Quote: domokl

That's because they rested .. The people are against, and the leadership is selling the country's prestige for a penny

and who is in our leadership, such matters are decided neither by Morozov, nor Serdyukov, nor even Medvedev, it's like in a song from a fairy tale, "even a chicken rushes at your command"
but in general it seems that by inserting information they carry out some kind of analysis of public opinion

[vezunchik]

That’s why the hero was given!

[Sarus]

Most likely they will say yes ...
And this transshipment point will stand oh how long ...
It will be used for operations in Syria and Iran ...
And who knows, maybe Azerbaijan and Georgia will support in case of conflict

[Prorox]

Can share information on the timing, on Iran and Syria, the support of Azerbaijan and Georgia as far as I can judge from koment, against Russia, and what just can’t tell the blow for example to Moscow. If you express insanity duck already in full.

[GSH-18]

And what kind of hysteria about the provision of a transshipment point ??! There is nothing terrible and criminal in this! This is just providing a service to a partner who fulfills, to a certain extent, a mission to us in Afghanistan. At the same time, our specialists will have the opportunity to spy on NATO members (they will certainly be spying along the way) - on-line exercises, exchange of experience
But seriously, Russia today cannot afford to communicate in the "shoe on the table" style. Therefore, diplomatic curtsy can and should be an instrument of deterring the predatory intentions of the states, provided that it does not harm the country. The provision of a transshipment point to NATO members is an excellent demonstration of Russia's goodwill to the entire world community - they will then have nothing to cover. Do not forget, dear ones, that the main issue for Russia today is reaching an agreement with amers on their European pro! Everything that is done is done in the context of this.

[101]

And then tell others that they are not good, they are ready to cooperate with NATO. And they, in response, are you yourself.

[sahha]

An excellent demonstration of goodwill, say, how many Gorbachev and Yeltsin demonstrated this goodwill, and what happened?

[sergskak]

I absolutely agree! Material benefits are far from the main thing that can be taken from this event. Yes, and those who are discussing this issue from our side are far from stupid people. And you can roll up this sharashka overnight.

[Churchill]

Ukraine we would not forgive this! ..

[magadanets]

In the pursuit of money, we forget the word honor.

[these]

let them open it will be possible to throw a grenade at and not leaving the country

cool word pendos cut out of koment

[esaul]

etah,
It’s necessary ... Soulful ...

[sergo0000]

I didn’t doubt it! Monitoring of public opinion is, of course, done! But on reflection, I will agree with Yesaul. I really hope that he knows his own tight!

[Kyrgyz]

on the one hand, I am opposed to NATO as such in general, but it must be taken into account, it is necessary to integrate as much as possible into this structure in order to obtain levers of paralysis of its activity and bring discord into their ranks, in Ulyanovsk you need to look at what we have in return, judging all over syria

[nnnnnnnnn]

And the most sophisticated of our high-ranking practitioners of Afghan politics once philosophically explained to me how incredibly Russia won and was highly ascended from the fact that the Americans settled in Afghanistan: “Remember how Mao Zedong taught? The most optimal position in politics is a monkey on a high mountain, with which she looks at the fighting between themselves in the deadly battle of a tiger and a crocodile. So, today, Russia in relation to the torment of Americans in Afghanistan is just that wise monkey ... ”

Yeah. Right

Here you and the monkey, and even the whole Kama Sutra. Moreover, the monkey is very giggling - about half a million Russians killed by heroin and 20 minutes of flying time. http://nnm.ru/blogs/midved1983/o-baze-nato-v-ulyanovske/#cut

[Churchill]

There is no reason for the Americans with such a knot to launch missiles, now they can deliver the warheads like that by trains! ..

[grizzlir]

I am interested in one question. What could be the reaction of our leadership if, say, Ukraine or Belarus agreed with NATO on the transit of goods through their territory?

[abeluk]

Before the election, Putin wondered: how can the Russians be united ?? - and he himself answered: by patriotism! and a banker, an effective manager for the sale of Russia.

[mr. Bender]

There is probably an economic benefit from the location of this center, perhaps there were some agreements with the West on this score. But there are definitely certain things, for example, sovereignty, national pride, etc., the search for a monetary equivalent that cannot just not be found, but the very possibility of such a search seems sacrilegious (both in relation to the people and in relation to the country's history). I think the case with the center in Ulyanovsk is just that. In general, it is difficult to get rid of the vague feeling that under pseudo-patriotic rhetoric, dear friends are selling and renting us with quiet glanders. For economic benefit.

[Alexmos]

Amer lose up to 10 million dollars a month for the war in Afghanistan

last week, Rep. Walter Jones of North Carolina raised the bill by saying, “We're spending $ 10 billion a month that we don’t have.”

It is beneficial for Russia to "keep" and "not to let go." VVP understands this well. All these "jumping with a tambourine" around the staging post in Ulyanovsk pursue, in my opinion, only one goal - to make it difficult for amers to escape from Afgan.

Regarding calls for an early withdrawal of troops from Afghanistan in the United States, Sergei Lavrov, the Russian foreign minister, gave a long interview on Sunday to a reporter from ToloNews, an Afghan television network. “I don’t think that the tasks have been solved,” Lavrov said in straightforward English. Grasping on the legal side of the issue, he cited the argument that US troops can leave Afghanistan only if they can report to the UN, that they have completed their mandate tasks, that is, they have established law and order in Afghanistan.

“It’s clear that the problems in Afghanistan persist, and the attacks do not stop,” he continued. “We are particularly concerned that terrorists are showing themselves in the north of Afghanistan, where the situation was relatively calm three years ago.” The terrorists, in fact, are driven out to the north of the IRA, from where they penetrate the territory of the Central Asian states neighboring the Russian Federation. ”

About the money:

Moscow greatly inflated the importance of allowing the transport of goods and NATO personnel through Russia. She does not indicate what is said in small print: Russian transport companies earn about $ 1 billion a year on these contracts.

All quotes from: articles: Afghanistan: Pass the $ 1 billion a week baton to Russia?

from amerovskoy newspaper

[sleepy]

And where does this billion dollars go?
In the department of Anatoly Eduardovich Serdyukov?

[sleepy]

The Americans launched a new printing press.
American Dream
http://video.yandex.ru/users/arni-raj/view/2119/?cauthor=arni-raj&cid=7#

And only General de Gaulle was able to exchange paper dollars for gold.
http://kolohost.ru/?p=5878

[sleepy]

The error came out, I beg your pardon.
Americans make not only dollars, but also learned print make gold from tungsten.
http://alex-serdyuk.livejournal.com/6782311.html
http://magov.net/blog/zagovor/3035.html
It looks like Americans are obsessed with money.

[Airparen109]

That's bullshit. It will not be this. We can let Europeans go, but Americans for nothing!

[Evgeny Petrovich]

Very often in the comments of an article about Libya and their life after Gaddafi, many wrote "What they fought with, they ran into it." In Russia, 63,3% voted for Putin, and 58,18% in Ulyanovsk.

[Kyrgyz]

If we want to recruit people into NATO and keep abreast of their plans, then we need to keep them close, it is through joint projects that it is easiest to do, we need to move away from confrontation with NATO, while at the same time leaving tension with the USA, including showing the members of the alliance that NATO is not only the United States, as we do with the EU ignoring the union and building relations with its individual sane members, showing that they are not the EU and the EU without them is bullshit, here it is necessary to do the opposite, but without close contact and a smile on your face we can’t break them

[savelij]

Let NATO allow transit! We have not yet forgotten how to let down the trains!

[UAZ Patriot]

I also thought about it;)

[APASUS]

So I did not get a clear answer from more than one article! What will Russia receive in exchange for the transit of goods, except for some mythical beliefs in friendship and cooperation.

[Kyrgyz]

APASUS,
We need a dialogue with them and a handshake, so cooperation and the ability to hang out in the maximum number of their offices is what we need, we must penetrate into their structure at an informal level at the everyday level if we want to dissolve their capabilities without "the last war for the current civilization."

[PatriotizTAT]

Thank you Putin ... well done, take a lollipop from the shelf ........ traitors !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[sleepy]

In my opinion, the president is not Putin right now, before the inauguration.
Perhaps the question of Ulyanovsk will be resolved before the inauguration.

[esaul]

Quote: sleepy

Perhaps the question of Ulyanovsk will be resolved before the inauguration.

And here I really doubt, colleague! Medvedev has an instinct for self-preservation, and he, realizing that he has done quite a few things that have not been thought through to the end, having resonance unfavorable for his reputation, will not aggravate an already spoiled image. But he still has to work in power ... So, this issue will finally have to be decided by the GDP.

[Prophet Alyosha]

Americans love symbolism. Blank Ulyanov-Lenin hails from Simbirsk-Ulyanovsk. He destroyed the Russian Empire and began the genocide of the people. Now the occupation of Russia is coming to an end, and again in Ulyanovsk ...

[Sniper 1968]

prophet Alyosha,

Quote: Prophet Alyosha

the occupation of Russia is completed, and again in Ulyanovsk ...

Ulyanovsk will be renamed Serdyukovsk ...

[Basil 2]

Yes, apparently they paid a lot where, but it’s all too expensive to buy, not a profitable business, and the managers calculated to pay politicians, journalists, public opinion centers and Internet PR, hello GSH-18, esaul, and other PR specialists. .

[sleepy]

In connection with the proposed NATO base in Ulyanovsk, rallies of pickets were held
http://svpressa.ru/society/article/53729/
You can still read the law N 99-FZ “On ratification of the Agreement between the states parties to the North Atlantic Treaty and other states participating in the program "Partnership for Peace" on the status of their Forces of June 19, 1995 and its Additional Protocol. ” Adopted by the State Duma on May 23, 2007, approved by the Federation Council on May 25, 2007.
http://ru-an.info/news_content.php?id=1323
By agreement of 1995 It is envisaged that the very same NATO troops will be located throughout Russia for a long time with weapons, rear and equipment, including aviation, ships, heavy and strategic weapons, as well as their civilian personnel and family members in Russia. According to law N 99-FZ they can do with us practically everything that the enemy’s armed forces can do on the territory of a captured country, but they will never bear any responsibility to Russia. This means that in the event of an attack on NATO personnel in Russia, as well as on their weapons, property, or even in the event of provocation, NATO members can take any action legally.
"The Russian Federation in accordance with paragraph 4 of Article VII
The agreement proceeds from the fact that the authorities of the sending state [USA] have the right to exercise their jurisdiction in the event that unidentified persons [read - units of the Russian army, the Ministry of Internal Affairs, partisans] commit crimes against this state, its military personnel at the locations of the forces of the sending state [USA] Forces, individuals from the civilian component or members of their families. ”In practice, this would mean the complete permissiveness of NATO troops in Russia.
This law is not easy to find, since in May 2011. a law was passed N 99-FZ "On Licensing", which appeared when they heard assessments of the treacherous nature of the first law N 99-FZratifying the agreement with NATO.
http://www.rg.ru/2007/06/16/partnesrstvo-doc.html
It should be recalled that the Ulyanovsk-Vostochny Airport has one of the longest runways in the world. He is able to receive aircraft of any class. This airfield is the base for the Aviastar-SP Ulyanovsk plant and for the 31st Guards Airborne Brigade. And at this strategically important airdrome, it is planned to place a “transshipment base” of NATO, which will have its own infrastructure and personnel.
http://kprf.ru/dep/104215.html
http://ru-an.info/news_content.php?id=846

[Cynic]

You are all evil, not fair!
Well, why deprive them of hope!

Seriously, with this base / item ... he knows!
On the one hand on .... we need them here in Ulyanovsk!
And on the other?
It is painfully amicable (on command?) Everyone, even tea lovers (hmm. In my opinion even especially loudly), in a friendly patriotic frenzy, are fighting in hysteria.
As Winnie the Pooh says: This is MF.
After all, think about it. They brought all this to Afghanistan and they did not need any base in Ulyanovsk! But how to eat .... then she suddenly (!!!) needed. Like, they suddenly carried out a logistic analysis and SAW that the piece of iron is cheaper !!!
Aren't you funny?
And here I am bitter for our blindness in this matter.
After all, this PROVOCATION in its purest form! And the majority was led!

[sleepy]

Indeed, emotions spill over the edge and statements by executives, coupled with articles in the media, heat a fire in a firebox.
It would be better if there was such a passion for joining the WTO.
Ukraine has already entered and does not know how to exit.

[CC-18a]

Mdee ... cool provocateurs kie deceive you) already funny)
And most importantly, everything was bought))) well, almost everything.

1.
The question is about pindos to trolls ... here you are trying to incite hatred of the possibility of transit through Ulyanovsk ... well, will you succeed, the Russian Federation will prohibit this project and, to completeness, will also block all transit to Afghanistan, will your hosts in the State Department stop you by the neck? But the State Department is not Putin, they will not forgive you, you will suddenly disappear from the face of the earth in guantanomo;) Is it with you that you are working against yourself?

2.
Who has read the draft agreement on transit through Ulyanovsk? alas, no, but much condemnation. To blame something you don’t know is very stupid! Let’s say the field of miracles)) 2 boxes, you refuse one of them, and yet it may have a million rubles. lie down, you just don’t know! and out of ignorance refuse the winning option. So first study what it is about and then let’s judge only SPECIFICLY! what why and how.
2.1 Those who talk about the Nato bases in Ulyanovsk are obviously delirious because there isn’t such a thing even in the project! The base is the base, and there is no nickel drop about the speech base!

3.
Here sleepy writes about some NATO troops on the territory of the Russian Federation, it is supposedly allowed by N 99-FZ "Partnership for Peace".
It’s strange either he deceives everyone and gets a grandmother for it, or he’s just stupid, knowing the mat. the base where you can read the topic still did not bother to get acquainted with it.
3.1 In fact, the law adopted in 2007 only creates legal prerequisites and laws for the transit of goods / shipping goods over NATO territory of the Russian Federation, stupidly created customs declarations for this type of cargo. That is, in those days, the Russian Federation helped reduce the NATO rear support, thereby having seized the lever of pressure on the United States.
Now, regarding the law itself, I’ve read it, and I’ve read it alone among the campaigns among you. In the law, both in our version and in the NATO version it is written clearly! loads of troops and stuff cross the border ONLY WITH PERMISSION OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION. That is, for the most stubborn, I repeat, they clearly write that they do not violate the sovereignty of the country (or as they write there they already forgot ... there is a more comprehensive word).
3.2 In addition, the Russian Federation constantly conducts different exercises with the United States and other countries, this law is absolutely from there and regulates everything exactly the same as any kind of teachings. What do you think? by conducting exercises from the United States, are we thereby allowing them to be located in our country? no! so it is with Ulyanovsk. REPEAT! amers enter the territory of the Russian Federation quite often and everything is based on the partnership for peace agreement and this is not a reason to run into the bunker with the words "we were occupied". The transshipment point in Ulyanovsk, if it is, will be on the same basis as any cruiser that entered our territorial waters.
3.3 And more ... based on the signed agreement, as far as the United States can import its goods and troops into the Russian Federation, so much the Russian Federation can into the United States, a bilateral agreement if what! But no one will tell you about this because reading the law and understanding its essence is more difficult than trolling and re-staging someone else’s opinion.

4.
Anyone who believes that in Russia we will have a NATO base with the same attributes and legal grounds as in Germany, Japan, etc. that one is simple DI FROM, especially if he believes that an ardent hater of the United States will allow it - Putin, this is not for you 90s!

[Magadan]

Everything would be fine with this base, but that topic regarding NATO’s admission to our territory under the 2007 law of the year is not as simple as in the post above. This law freely allows their troops access to Russia and, moreover, it can be interpreted in such a way that with in any scenario, our army does not even have the right to resist. Does anyone know anything about this? Maybe the moderators will write an article?
If there is such a law, then the transit is clearly under it, and this is beneficial to our enemies, who want to sell Russia to the West (remember, we own 40% of the world's resources and "they" will stop at nothing) And most importantly, this is already was in history - in 1612 the Poles, at the invitation of our traitorous rulers, sat in the Kremlin.

[vladim.gorbunow]

To talk about the Amer base in Ulyanovsk and to keep silent about the use of aviation and artillery in Dagestan, about sending troops from Chechnya there is slightly false. The northern direction is being deployed against Iran, the rear lines and advanced bridgeheads. Everything else is informational cover.

[CC-18a]

What law gives free access? show me a quote from this law with reference to it? if not, then do not deceive me and everyone else. I read the law, what you write is not there, then you are lying, WHY are you lying?

By law, without the permission of the government, nobody will let in NATO goods or the military, first of all it is customs! The customs officers are simple, there is a law where it is allowed ok, no such a law will not be allowed! there is a law by which it is necessary to skip there it will be written that this cargo must either be inspected or at least declared. If you live in your little world and do not see beyond your nose, this is not a reason to talk about what you are talking about at all!

Um .. but in general, as far as you are right, I have the right under the law to shoot you))))))) is absurd, but no more than your statements.

Hmm .. I thought people here are smart ... well, at least not 18-year-old and not stupid trolls ... so far I’m convinced of the opposite (

[woman]

with a base of incomprehensibility why, if transit through us ZhDR goes, maybe drugs with prisoners or something else. and so guys go to jo ... our guys in the Kremlin know better than your business to interfere with a pig snout in their affairs. kaposhite

[earthling]

How it did not sound. But the United States Saudi Arabia spread like rabbits. Obama is now krantets in the elections. And most importantly, in a possible future war against radical Islam, only the United States can help us.