Satanovsky spoke about the complete failure of the United States in Syria

7
President of the Middle East Institute Yevgeny Satanovsky about the failed US policy in Syria.



7 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Some kind of compote Rank
    Some kind of compote
    +16
    13 October 2017 11: 18
    New TV star?
    "complete" failure or not yet?
    We must all wait for real results - legal and organizational
  2. Orel
    Orel
    0
    13 October 2017 11: 18
    Like we won a lot. There is only one winner - Assad. Everything is done for him there, they’ll breed, feathers fly, and he is on a horse. He needs weapons - please, supplies - take it. To fight instead of it - PMCs, our troops, the IRGC, Hezbollah. And he gave us the "base". We will have to drag them for a long time, and even restore it. But he is certainly well done, such a Middle Eastern "dad". Skillfully furnished everything.
    1. pepel79 Rank
      pepel79
      +2
      13 October 2017 12: 35
      You’re wrong, we’ll lose Syria, we’ll lose the country's budget ... Qatar will carry out a gas pipeline to Europe and sail ... A gas needle is not much less than an oil one, and Assad, without giving Qatar consent to carry out a gas pipeline (and having lost a lot of money from transit) , saved our needle, for which he is now paying the war. So whose war is this ??? His or ours ???
      By the way, we must not forget that after running in our armament and customers, it increased by ... we got combat experience with a base in addition and more ...
      1. Orel
        Orel
        0
        13 October 2017 13: 51
        Quote: pepel79
        You are wrong, we’ll lose Syria, we’ll lose the country's budget ... Qatar will draw a gas pipeline to Europe and sail ...


        Well, of course, gouging the whole country, creating chaos for decades - this is the way to build a gas pipeline to Europe))))))))))))))))) Do you really believe that ???
        1. pepel79 Rank
          pepel79
          +1
          13 October 2017 14: 22
          Gorbachev, too, believed in friendship ... But the collapse of the cost of a barrel, the destruction of vineyards (alcohol 3 in the budget of the USSR), the refusal of Germany to supply pipes for the same gas pipeline and other tricks, did their job ... Now they want to repeat the same ... history not only needs to be known but also remembered ...
          1. pepel79 Rank
            pepel79
            0
            13 October 2017 14: 26
            this is the way to build a gas pipeline to Europe)))))))))))))))))). But why do you think the Kurds ... didn’t succeed through Syria, we need to create a different path, and then we agreed with Turkey and it wedged between the so-called Kurdistan ... again ripping off all the plans of the mattresses
      2. Alekseev Rank
        Alekseev
        +1
        13 October 2017 15: 22
        Quote: pepel79
        Qatar will hold a gas pipeline to Europe and have sailed ...

        And what, past Syria can not Qatar to Europe? wink Via S. Arabia, Jordan and Israel? Or Qatar borders with Syria?
        Quote: pepel79
        lose Syria, and lose the country's budget ...

        And that's for sure. The war in Syria for us war for influence in the middle east.
        If the U.S. is ruled over there, they can force local sheikhs, kings, etc. bay to sell oil not for 50 or even for 30, but for 5 dollars, and even kiss the pen for that ...
        1. pepel79 Rank
          pepel79
          0
          13 October 2017 16: 50
          And you are funny ... Israel Tse Europe ... they will be pulling the pipe across the Mediterranean Sea ... Qatar, S. Arabia, Jordan, Syria, Turkey (the waterway is not a larger stretch of the strait, which I cannot say, most likely the bottleneck) and ole Bulgaria, here you have Europe ...
          If the United States will rule completely, then they can force local sheikhs, kings, etc. bay to sell oil not for 50 or even for 30, but for 5 dollars, and even kiss the pens for it ... They still rule, but you miss some facts: independence was bought at a high price. For example, the UAE, half of the income from the sale of oil (before 2025) is given to Britain, Qatar, also called a huge English company (not for nothing, probably), etc. Anglo-Saxons know how to count money, and they don’t intend to lose it, and the first persons of the USA feed at the expense of the same sheikhs (the children of politicians are sitting on the board of oil and gas companies) and recently the relations between the sheikhs and mattresses have become somehow under cool down. And oil is not unlimited (according to estimates, special reserves from the same UAE, at such rates of production, will begin to dry up after about 20 years)