Military Review

The US Navy received new guided bombs

41
The US Navy has adopted a new high-precision bombs. According to the portal navaltoday.com, US military assigned JSOW C-1 guided bombs full operational readiness status.


The US Navy received new guided bombs


JSOW C-1 bombs were first tested in April 2015, and a year later they received the status of initial operational readiness. Today it became known that the command of the US Navy confirmed all the capabilities of ammunition declared by the manufacturer. In addition, the Defense Ministry indicates that all US Navy airborne squadrons are already armed with new bombs.

Joint Standoff Weapon (JSOW) C-1 is a medium-range managed aerial bomb. It can be equipped with various types of warheads, while the guidance system supports “command” re-targeting (dropping from one aircraft, directing the other). A smart bomb can hit both stationary and mobile targets. In addition, for the US Army has developed a modified JSOW with extended range (JSOW-ER), using a Pratt & Whitney TJ-150 turbojet engine to increase the flight range, "Warspot".
Photos used:
http://navaltoday.com/
41 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. iliitchitch
    iliitchitch 13 October 2017 09: 48 New
    0
    Already with a turbojet engine, about how. Oversight will now be even easier. You can also fast-boost-reverse-UVT add. Yes, here modernization for decades.
  2. oldseaman1957
    oldseaman1957 13 October 2017 09: 49 New
    +4
    If you bomb with such bombs, you will remain without pants!
    1. bouncyhunter
      bouncyhunter 13 October 2017 09: 50 New
      +2
      They have a magical printing press. wink
      1. Maki Avellevich
        Maki Avellevich 13 October 2017 09: 53 New
        +4
        Quote: bouncyhunter
        They have a magic printing press.


        only with them?
        why then everyone does not print candy wrappers until they lose consciousness if it is so simple?
        1. bouncyhunter
          bouncyhunter 13 October 2017 09: 56 New
          +3
          Remember what is the global currency - that’s the answer to your question.
          1. Maki Avellevich
            Maki Avellevich 13 October 2017 18: 19 New
            +1
            Quote: bouncyhunter
            Remember what is the global currency - that’s the answer to your question.


            You’ve got a vicious circle.
            The dollar is the world currency because it prints a lot and it prints a lot because the world currency.

            why America and not Spain or Britain is now steering?
            1. LAWNER
              LAWNER 14 October 2017 17: 48 New
              +1
              Mark Avellyevich !!! Why don’t you get the shekels in exchange for the dollars. Iron exchange !!!!
        2. avdkrd
          avdkrd 13 October 2017 10: 14 New
          +3
          Quote: Maki Avellevich
          why then everyone does not print candy wrappers until they lose consciousness if it is so simple?

          for this it is necessary that the world financial centers bend as it was under the Bretton Woods agreements. Formally, this gives some advantages and simplifies international payments, but control of the machine by one country will inevitably lead to abuse. Given that the dollar is not formally owned by the United States, but is a derivative of a private Fed company, it is natural that the abuse turned into outright fraud.
        3. Kurare
          Kurare 13 October 2017 13: 29 New
          +2
          Quote: Maki Avellevich
          why then everyone does not print candy wrappers until they lose consciousness if it is so simple?

          Because there will be a depreciation of the currency. And what the Americans are doing is inflating an “evergreen” bubble under an oil film. Moreover, if someone begins to oppose this (Hussein, Gaddafi), he is declared the persona non-grata and sent to the scrap.
          1. Maki Avellevich
            Maki Avellevich 14 October 2017 09: 03 New
            0
            Quote: Kurare
            Because there will be a depreciation of the currency. And what the Americans are doing is inflating an “evergreen” bubble under an oil film.


            for those sitting in a tank - what prevents in this case each country producing oil from printing "under the oil film"?
            1. Zefr
              Zefr 14 October 2017 09: 13 New
              0
              Gaddafi's memories
            2. Kurare
              Kurare 14 October 2017 13: 56 New
              +2
              Quote: Maki Avellevich
              ... to every oil producing country ...

              Producing oil does not mean controlling its sale. The dollar just for a very long time was the ONLY means (currency) for the purchase and sale of oil. This is a breakdown of the entire purchase and sale system. In addition, and this must be paid tribute to the creators of such a system, due to its stability, when switching to an excellent system from the dollar one, sellers / buyers have additional risks.

              Never look at a currency called USD only as a currency, in its classical sense. For a long time there is no DOLLAR, there is only NEFTEDOLLAR.
      2. oldseaman1957
        oldseaman1957 13 October 2017 09: 56 New
        +1
        Quote: bouncyhunter
        They have a magical printing press.
        - This machine prevents them from thinking. And Lafa ends ...
        1. bouncyhunter
          bouncyhunter 13 October 2017 09: 58 New
          +1
          And they again raise the level of public debt. yes
    2. askort154
      askort154 13 October 2017 09: 54 New
      0
      oldseaman1957 .......If you bomb with such bombs, you will be left without pants!

      They sew pants on the same machine that prints their tugriks.
    3. Vadim237
      Vadim237 13 October 2017 22: 39 New
      +1
      Already more than 30000 have made such bombs - an excellent tool for the destruction of air defense systems.
  3. Aaron Zawi
    Aaron Zawi 13 October 2017 09: 51 New
    +4
    Judging by the size, it is created taking into account the capabilities of the F-35.
    1. Soho
      Soho 13 October 2017 10: 41 New
      0
      Aron Zawi Today, 09:51 New
      Judging by the size, it is created taking into account the capabilities of the F-35.

      it is doubtful that she will enter the inner compartment of light.
      1. Aaron Zawi
        Aaron Zawi 13 October 2017 11: 05 New
        0
        Quote: Soho

        it is doubtful that she will enter the inner compartment of light.

        With folded wings should go in.
      2. voyaka uh
        voyaka uh 13 October 2017 11: 36 New
        +3
        All aircraft ammunition (except the largest) are now “sharpened" under the internal compartment of the F-35.
      3. voyaka uh
        voyaka uh 13 October 2017 12: 54 New
        +5
        Here is the F-35, dropping JSOW (there is a video)
  4. Tusv
    Tusv 13 October 2017 09: 51 New
    +5
    Poor weddings, tractors and transformer booths. They definitely cannot escape American retaliation
  5. seregatara1969
    seregatara1969 13 October 2017 09: 51 New
    0
    What is the price of this flying bomb? Is this price commensurate with the price of the target hit? and will there be any economic sense from its application? because there are just small rockets
    1. Chestnut
      Chestnut 13 October 2017 11: 13 New
      +3
      Quote: seregatara1969
      What is the price of this flying bomb? Is this price commensurate with the price of the target hit? and will there be any economic sense from its application? because there are just small rockets

      A quick victory over the enemy will justify any price.
      At this rate of US development, we will soon be like natives, we have almost all Soviet-style weapons.
      1. Gray brother
        Gray brother 13 October 2017 12: 02 New
        +1
        Quote: Chestnut
        we have almost all Soviet-style weapons.

        And what should it be? NATO tunnels? laughing
  6. svp67
    svp67 13 October 2017 09: 59 New
    +5
    A smart bomb can
    Well, what is she "smart", if it resolves itself out of the plane, but to throw it without a parachute? Fool, fool ...
  7. rudolff
    rudolff 13 October 2017 10: 37 New
    10
    What an amazing concern about the US budget. A guided bomb, it's expensive, it's stupid, it's not necessary. And when we utilize bundles of almost gold KR 3M14, coupled with the X-101 in sheds and garages, this is normal, this is combat training.
    1. Tektor
      Tektor 13 October 2017 11: 32 New
      +1
      We also have a similar device - called Thunder-2, caliber 250 kg. It can also be equipped with an engine, then it is Thunder-1 with a warhead mass of 130 kg and a range of 280 km. They say a very accurate thing, and can fly into the window.
    2. Gray brother
      Gray brother 13 October 2017 12: 08 New
      0
      Quote: rudolff
      And when we utilize bundles of almost gold KR 3M14, coupled with the X-101 in sheds and garages, this is normal, this is combat training.

      Our main adversary is NATO, not the Papuans. Devices involving the use of enemy air defense in the zone of operation are not particularly needed. Therefore, the emphasis on missiles that need to be able to be used, so yes - combat training.
      1. rudolff
        rudolff 13 October 2017 13: 06 New
        +5
        Reinforced concrete logic! And now we are fighting with Syria, with NATO? And for NATO, which state is the main military adversary? Papuania?
        Or maybe the Americans are simply trying to protect expensive weapons, replacing them with less expensive UABs if possible? Not combat training with us, but window dressing. Very expensive window dressing.
        1. Gray brother
          Gray brother 13 October 2017 13: 16 New
          +1
          Quote: rudolff
          And for NATO, which state is the main military adversary? Papuania?

          Anyone unable to give a fitting rebuff.
          Quote: rudolff
          And now we are fighting with Syria, with NATO?

          No, but this is not a reason to refuse to improve weapons intended for war with a technologically advanced enemy. And also no reason to spend money on organizing the production of anti-gun weapons.
          We already have capable bombs, but it’s great for Papuans and cast-iron.
        2. Gray brother
          Gray brother 13 October 2017 13: 21 New
          0
          Quote: rudolff
          Not combat training with us, but window dressing. Very expensive window dressing

          The advance of the Syrian army suggests otherwise.
          1. rudolff
            rudolff 13 October 2017 14: 04 New
            +4
            In the advancement of the Syrian army, Caliber, as well as the X-101, did not play exactly any role. But the budget for the repair of Kuznetsov or the modernization of the submarine may have been cut. Specifically, in Syria, free-falling bombs are quite enough, in special cases - UAB / KAB. Using CD is just throwing money away.
        3. just exp
          just exp 14 October 2017 07: 01 New
          0
          in Syria there is a running-in of personnel and armaments, everything has already been rolled around a lot of times, so for them the MA is redundant, since the flyers can all and targets without air defense.
  8. pvv113
    pvv113 13 October 2017 10: 39 New
    +2
    US Navy adopts new precision bombs

    They boast of their high-precision weapons, but they constantly bomb civilians
    Or maybe so conceived?
    1. Vadim851
      Vadim851 13 October 2017 11: 13 New
      +2
      The building density is too high in the Arab countries, streets are generally barely able to separate. Unfortunately, civilian casualties are inevitable, it would be better if the B-52 would cover areas like in Vietnam. In addition, where is the guarantee that from the moment the target designation is issued and even during the flight of the means of destruction, no one will be there by chance. And again, speaking about the WTO, it is not intended to exclude the tact of losses, but to reduce them.
      He can’t do without the WTO now.
    2. voyaka uh
      voyaka uh 13 October 2017 12: 16 New
      +3
      Statistically, the ratio of Americans killed during the bombing of militants to civilians is 1: 2 - 1: 3. This is very good. Israel had the best ratio of 1: 1,5
      In Russia during the bombing of the provinces of Idlib and Aleppo 1: 4 - 1: 5
      1. pvv113
        pvv113 13 October 2017 14: 14 New
        +4
        Thanks for the information, but can I have a link?
  9. Will
    Will 13 October 2017 10: 59 New
    0
    Managed? winked "Hackers" forward!))
  10. san4es
    san4es 13 October 2017 12: 04 New
    +3
    It can be equipped with various types of warheads.

    ... this one with a cassette warhead
  11. Music
    Music 13 October 2017 19: 08 New
    0
    And a cruise missile is a smart bomb with an engine. You can reset without an engine.
    1. Vadim237
      Vadim237 13 October 2017 22: 41 New
      +1
      They have a tactical cruise missile with a range of 1000 kilometers AGM 158
  12. Nasty
    Nasty 14 October 2017 09: 15 New
    0
    Cool stuff.